Self Destructive Thoughts - by Marie Louise von Franz

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มิ.ย. 2024
  • 0:00 Self-Destructive Thoughts
    1:15 Women's Double Play
    2:16 Princess Syndrome
    3:44 Father Complex
    4:52 Authoritarian Animus
    6:35 Repressing Anger
    7:48 Destructive Animus
    8:47 Rejecting Her Own Feeling
    10:05 Animus Thoughts
    11:22 Marriage
    12:52 Pregnancy
    14:29 Education & Career
    15:31 Animus Possession
    17:24 Animus Reaction
    21:04 Secret Demon Lover
    MY SOCIAL MEDIA & WEBSITE:
    ➜ / studentsguildx
    ➜ studentsguild.webflow.io
    These clips are made from the interview of Marie-Louise von Franz (The Way of the Dream, 1988) with Fraser Boa.
    My name is Baris Kilic. I'm an English Teacher and an Interior Designer. I'm based in Vietnam.

ความคิดเห็น • 10

  • @yusaaziz3214
    @yusaaziz3214 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ohh this is brilliant, thank you so much for doing this

  • @TrinityTheoryTypology-nx5ms
    @TrinityTheoryTypology-nx5ms หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If you can find more MLVF please post!

  • @cwwsheepy94
    @cwwsheepy94 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Is there a version for men ?

    • @studentsguildx
      @studentsguildx  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Check out my channel. Below, these videos have some information for men. Look for words like "mother complex" in the videos' descriptions:
      th-cam.com/video/koGLV-cTFqs/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/GrZmzKJotJk/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/DncB6hVkvUo/w-d-xo.html

    • @gerardochavez-vh2bw
      @gerardochavez-vh2bw 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The anima

    • @fiber04
      @fiber04 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Simply reverse the roles in this story with "man" and that should work too. It works both ways quite neatly ;)

  • @user-yo9pv1ni6t
    @user-yo9pv1ni6t 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    I woulkd say it is more important that women develope their masculine side than for men their anima side. At this super duper duper critical stage in man's journey on plaet earth. The New Orleans Jung club metts 6 months of the year, The meetings are like 70% women, Women are drawn to Jung's ideas But the club is not growing Its the same 30 women that show up every meeting past 20 yrs. THese meetings do nothing for these women, THe speaker is so far off Jung's ideas, making up things as he/she goes. Jung predicted his ideas would die. and so has come true. It is not what he wanted, but he sensed after his death his ideas would go through a weird morphosis, leading into all sorts of crazy ideas. And so it has come to pass. Jung could see the future very clearly.
    The New York branch has nothing to offer, The California club is even worse. I've looked at many YT vids of Jungian groups and its all bunk. The european schools also offer nothing of Jung's ideas in developement.
    and to run from this reality is what we call The Shadow. = Jung is traped in Shadow ,,,Jung would laugh, Jung had a great sense of humor, but I am sure some tears of sadness would be mixed in w tears of being so funny at the thought of it all.

    • @1kenneth1985
      @1kenneth1985 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes - you describe s.t.h. Important and yet rarely acknowledged (by all those who have a stake in it financially , or status, or whatever rings their chimes)
      Hence i stay well clear of all those courses, clubs & groups.
      Many years ago i invested in the Collective Works, Vol 1 - 20, his letters Vol I and II (can’t find Vol III), the redbook ( in german and some translations) and read CGJ straight and not relying on others for interpretations. I do like MLvF, Robert A Johnson and some others who have actually met and/or worked w/ CGJ.
      Or the book compilation “ C.G.Jung speaking - Interviews & Encounters”
      You might be familiar with an important book on that subject, by Peter Kingsley “Catafalque”. Not for the faint of heart and might be an acquired taste - though i am very grateful that he had the courage to write it. Published 2018 as i recall. He describes just that what you addressed above. If you haven’t read it, there is a good review on the book by MGemelli (if i remember her name correctly). Or just plunge right into reading those 2 volumes.

    • @user-yo9pv1ni6t
      @user-yo9pv1ni6t 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@1kenneth1985 Hi Yes I started collecting hard copies and soft copies, have Jung's 2 vol sets on Nietzsche and 1 other seminar 2 vol set. THe Nietz seminar 2 vol goes for like $350++ a set, I paid like $200 some 16 yrs ago, Note Jung's Psycholgical Types soft copy , last printing was 1974, Every single copy falls aprt, crappy glue down, = One of THE most important books EVER EVER written Psych Types, and Princton had to use very veryyy poor binding glue. The hard copy's are pricing up and up now, Have mine arriving ina few weeks $45.
      Funnay thing, Jung now is my active imagination teacher, its crazy, I am having dialogues w Jung. Jung and I would be the greatest friends and yet the greatest enemies, I am now reading Jung via super critical mind, There is soem of Jung I take issue with. Can not stand **the Jungians*** Robert Johnson, and the whole lot.
      I like Barbara Hannah's bio on Jung, all of MLVon Franz, but again via a critical reading. After 40 yrs doodling around with Jung I can FINALLY read, undersatnd and critque. There is alot lotttt of Jungian stiuff that is not faithful to Jung's genius. Edwin Edinger, no thanks. Etc etc ETC. ONly Jung and Von Franz stays on my shelf.
      Nice Day
      Paul
      New Orleans

  • @wieslaw111
    @wieslaw111 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    she is mocking the victims in old and long analytical tradition, CG Jung did this too.