Why do I imagine that what we're seeing here is the point of view of a bunch of Jawas salivating at all that sweet salvage they're going to collect later? 😆
@@fadillah6014 Kinda. This only happens outside the map boundaries beyond what you can reach in a ship. You can see it up in the sky while you're playing as a soldier on the map but you can't get close to the ships or participate in it. I believe whichever side wins the background cutscene is determined by which team is winning.
@@fadillah6014 Pretty much describes all of 2015 lol, missed opportunity: the game. Some of them may have been players but I think there's a max of 2-3 ships per team on that map and they can't fly close to that battle (I've tried, you run out of time before you can get close). You can't play as a Y-Wing or Tie Bomber in 2015 as well, only fighters and interceptors.
Looks like a lot of TIE pilots survived. Must’ve been a flight of aces. Damn tho as much as I like the Rebellion, it’s nice to see them take a few losses for a change.
@@geraldcheaves4222 oh you're using the bs rules of Force Awakens. That's really breaking the ACTUAL rules of hyperspace, that involve gravity wells around a planet. It's the entire concept around things like interdictor star destroyers.
...realistically, something that large crashing, unless its from really really low, would kill anyone standing as close as our POV person is, especially when the reactors cook off from damage.
@@J.A.S kinetic energy release upon impact would be the main reason. Unless that ships falling from only a few miles up, it'll be carrying enough kinetic energy that combined with its weight, isn't going to just shake people like we see,it'll be acting as a rather powerful earthquake easily strong enough to throw people off their feet. If that ship was shot down in low orbit, then she should be reproducing what happened to the Super Star Destroyer Executor in Return of the Jedi ("intensify forward firepower!") After she lost her bridge and for some reason pulled a hard left turn straight into the death star (i have a long standing "how the shit is this possible when the ship has a crew of over 300k who could have taken control again...?" About that scene)... she'd make a explosion large enough to be seen from thousands of miles away. Even if she wasn't that low/fast enough for that, the cruisers a warship carrying power stores, stupid powerful fusion drives, and muntions; a impact that heavy would kill the crew, throw previously bolted down pieces of equipment free, and made neatly stored warheads and stuff suddenly ram into the ceilings, and bombs and fully running fusion reactors generally respond to damage like that by exploding. What we should have seen is the cruiser belly flop, her engines flare a few times, then either a chain reaction of explosions over a few seconds or minutes that builds to a giant, nuclear bomb scale explosion that throws pieces of the ship everywhere and flash fries everyone within a few miles (this is a "less apocalyptic" scenario) or just belly flop in and instantly explode in the "more likely, more apocalyptic" scenario when one highly explosive system cooks off powerfully enough to instantly set off every other system onboard that can explode, in which case the players on the ground get to see a white flash, wall of fire, then nothing. If a starship is firing energy weapons with the yields of small nuclear bombs, she has the power systems and capacitor storage capabilities to also BE a giant flying bomb in her own right. Hell, even unarmed, a ship with a fusion reactors a rather large bomb waiting to go off... for a example of this, look at the Aurora in Subnautica and how she burns for awhile in the distance, then Rips herself apart as her reactor(s) cook off....
@@Shinzon23 a very interesting take. I for one think that should not necessarily be the case tho. :) First, energy weapons in there are not necessarily like dynamite or nitroglycerin that will explode upon impact or because of fire. Think of a stored atomic bomb, turned off, that would be in a hangar that catches fire. You don't get a nuclear explosion. What you do get is normal explosions, but with radioactivity if the atomic bomb shell is cracked... Also, I recently came across the incredible account of a Gulf War veteran whose buddy was in a tank that was hit by an rpg. Unlike russian tanks, the ammo is in a specially designed compartment with blowout panels to deflect the explosion away from the crew. I couldn't believe it but these guysnot only survived, but they were not even wounded and didn't even get a day off! Of course in Star Wars stuff explodes all the time so there's a good chance eye candy wins.
@@luketimewalker nuclear bombs ultimately are not actively storing a electrical charge in them, whilst the power cell for a energy weapon is; a nuke cooks off, even if it detonates fully, it's just stored chemical energy on steroids. Remember that the energy cell is DESIGNED to store and release energy, and if it can't do that unidirectionally, it'll do it omnidirectionally, and at the very least, everything in the compartment is going to get electrocuted, and possibly vaporized.
@@RicardoPerez-rz8pu because the Moncalamari capital ships such as the mc80 liberties And all other moncala ships and cruisers/dreadnaughts even home 1 had redundant and repeating shield generators making them very hard to take down and far superior to star destroyers
Gunshipping mostly, so they can provide support to ground forces, orbital bombardment only works with Turbolasers, missiles and strong enough blaster cannons. Something rebel ships do not have in number or at all as they use Laser type weapons so the atmosphere would vastly weaken or stop the laser from doing the damage it needs to do, forcing them lower.
Guess there is no such thing as an AA screen in Star Wars...might want to take a hard look at the Galactica reboot for more accurate ship to ship combat.
Star Wars is fantasy not science fiction, I mean come on, they have wizards. *spoiler* space nazis get defeated by space teddy bears. Let's see a BSG episode like that.
Gods these games stunk, EA really does make the worst games. The MC-80 line as a whole had the best Mon Calamari shielding available at that time. I counted 9 shots, with a big gap between 7 and 8. The ISD II Star destroyer can not only completely destroy the shielding of a MC-80 and do enough damage to make it fall from low orbit in 9 rounds. Not to mention the fact that the ISD II is above the MC-80, preventing its largest cannons from firing on the target. All in all EA sucks at making games.
This feels so much more realistic, form the slower lasers, the accurate falling, the raw power of a star destroyer,. The rebellion not having plot armour and losing lol
Everyone here whining about this match up yes it was 3 star destroyers vs one liberty MC80 and small corvettes and frigates not fair. Yes Mon Calamari ships have super powerful shields and armour, Yes star destroyers have superior firepower your all right now shut up it’s a EA battlefront background battle 😅
felt ralistic exept for MC-80 being destroyed so fast 1 could stand(not destroy them but survive) those 3 star destroyers for a fair amount of time if something the nebulon-B and the CR-90 would have been taken down pretty fast
I don't get it. Thses are powerful capital ships with heavy weapons. Why aren't they maneuvering, coordinating fire? They're just sitting there!? Clearly I am not a member of the target audience.🤨
the Empire is doing what their ships are made to do, point all firepower forwards, the rebels are just a mixed bag, and many are not militarily adept. Thus, I think they tried to brute force it but ignored the fact the Star Destroyer is built for front on engagements.
Not possible; the hyperspace safeties would kick in when it was far outside the atmosphere, otherwise it would ram into the planet its meant to conquer at a damn fast pace and kill everything on its surface.
The audio and vid don't match. They keep mentioning AT-ATs and Walkers but you're showing ships. It would sound better if we heard chatter between the ships, even if in the background.
![[🔴LIVE] งานประกาศรางวัล MAYA TV AWARDS 2024 : มายามหาชน](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nwmWYXXVwBY/mqdefault.jpg)
"So this is how liberty dies..."
With a thunderous bonk
Literally
Why do I imagine that what we're seeing here is the point of view of a bunch of Jawas salivating at all that sweet salvage they're going to collect later? 😆
😂😂😂😂😂
3:20 EA: No one will notice the graphic hiccup, they'll be too busy shooting lasers and buying lootboxes to look up...
this is actually Battlefront from 2015
@@NM-wd4ug that’s EA too. The original Battlefront 1 & 2 from the early 2000’s are the ones that EA had nothing to do with.
@@ivar637 he meant that as in Battlefront 2015 didn’t have lootboxes.
That’s probably it switching to the falling animation
Its a shame on how the background battles for 2015 always looked far more interesting than the current map you played on.
So this is only cinematic background not player gameplay?
@@fadillah6014 Kinda. This only happens outside the map boundaries beyond what you can reach in a ship. You can see it up in the sky while you're playing as a soldier on the map but you can't get close to the ships or participate in it. I believe whichever side wins the background cutscene is determined by which team is winning.
@@alexmauney9705 well that kinda misopportunity that kind game, but that fighter and bombers was players right?
@@fadillah6014 Pretty much describes all of 2015 lol, missed opportunity: the game. Some of them may have been players but I think there's a max of 2-3 ships per team on that map and they can't fly close to that battle (I've tried, you run out of time before you can get close). You can't play as a Y-Wing or Tie Bomber in 2015 as well, only fighters and interceptors.
Looks like a lot of TIE pilots survived. Must’ve been a flight of aces.
Damn tho as much as I like the Rebellion, it’s nice to see them take a few losses for a change.
Yeah, not as one sided as Disney likes to make it.
This
Looks awesome how 3 Star Destroyers came out from hyperspace!!! Long live the Empire!!!
They weren't coming out of hyperspace, especially that close to a planet. They were simply entering the atmosphere at a high speed.
@@bobmcham5192 Destroyers have hyperjumped directly into an atmosphere before.
@@sylquinn4075 When? It breaks the rules of hyperspace travel.
@@bobmcham5192 You can hyperjump into atmospheres, its just risky due the massive damage a hyperspace impact can cause to a planet
@@geraldcheaves4222 oh you're using the bs rules of Force Awakens. That's really breaking the ACTUAL rules of hyperspace, that involve gravity wells around a planet. It's the entire concept around things like interdictor star destroyers.
...realistically, something that large crashing, unless its from really really low, would kill anyone standing as close as our POV person is, especially when the reactors cook off from damage.
Can you explain why please?
@@J.A.S kinetic energy release upon impact would be the main reason. Unless that ships falling from only a few miles up, it'll be carrying enough kinetic energy that combined with its weight, isn't going to just shake people like we see,it'll be acting as a rather powerful earthquake easily strong enough to throw people off their feet.
If that ship was shot down in low orbit, then she should be reproducing what happened to the Super Star Destroyer Executor in Return of the Jedi ("intensify forward firepower!") After she lost her bridge and for some reason pulled a hard left turn straight into the death star (i have a long standing "how the shit is this possible when the ship has a crew of over 300k who could have taken control again...?" About that scene)... she'd make a explosion large enough to be seen from thousands of miles away.
Even if she wasn't that low/fast enough for that, the cruisers a warship carrying power stores, stupid powerful fusion drives, and muntions; a impact that heavy would kill the crew, throw previously bolted down pieces of equipment free, and made neatly stored warheads and stuff suddenly ram into the ceilings, and bombs and fully running fusion reactors generally respond to damage like that by exploding.
What we should have seen is the cruiser belly flop, her engines flare a few times, then either a chain reaction of explosions over a few seconds or minutes that builds to a giant, nuclear bomb scale explosion that throws pieces of the ship everywhere and flash fries everyone within a few miles (this is a "less apocalyptic" scenario) or just belly flop in and instantly explode in the "more likely, more apocalyptic" scenario when one highly explosive system cooks off powerfully enough to instantly set off every other system onboard that can explode, in which case the players on the ground get to see a white flash, wall of fire, then nothing.
If a starship is firing energy weapons with the yields of small nuclear bombs, she has the power systems and capacitor storage capabilities to also BE a giant flying bomb in her own right.
Hell, even unarmed, a ship with a fusion reactors a rather large bomb waiting to go off... for a example of this, look at the Aurora in Subnautica and how she burns for awhile in the distance, then Rips herself apart as her reactor(s) cook off....
@@Shinzon23 a very interesting take. I for one think that should not necessarily be the case tho. :)
First, energy weapons in there are not necessarily like dynamite or nitroglycerin that will explode upon impact or because of fire. Think of a stored atomic bomb, turned off, that would be in a hangar that catches fire. You don't get a nuclear explosion. What you do get is normal explosions, but with radioactivity if the atomic bomb shell is cracked...
Also, I recently came across the incredible account of a Gulf War veteran whose buddy was in a tank that was hit by an rpg. Unlike russian tanks, the ammo is in a specially designed compartment with blowout panels to deflect the explosion away from the crew. I couldn't believe it but these guysnot only survived, but they were not even wounded and didn't even get a day off!
Of course in Star Wars stuff explodes all the time so there's a good chance eye candy wins.
@@luketimewalker nuclear bombs ultimately are not actively storing a electrical charge in them, whilst the power cell for a energy weapon is; a nuke cooks off, even if it detonates fully, it's just stored chemical energy on steroids.
Remember that the energy cell is DESIGNED to store and release energy, and if it can't do that unidirectionally, it'll do it omnidirectionally, and at the very least, everything in the compartment is going to get electrocuted, and possibly vaporized.
It crashed from literally maybe 1-2 miles up.
Nebulon B just chilling in the corner
What are the star destroyers waiting for after the crashing?
Making sure it stays down
@@LTButtstrong lol
@@LTButtstrong imagine it just reverses and fly's back up 😂
@@datt7398 "ROUND 2 BITCHES!" 🤣
@@LTButtstrong 💀💀💀
That hits so different
Death to the rebellion. Long live the empire.
Watch Star Wars episode IX
@TheCrazyGopnik sorry I don't watch trash. Besides didn't they retcon it?
@Peregrine ? Who is this we. If it's the rebellion then my emperor had a plan. In just months he took back the galaxy.
Haha indeed
Death to the Empire. It died as it lived quickly and incompetently.
Damn that's cool looking. Just to be an observer and witness a fight between these giants... It's breathtaking.
Jawas gonna loot!
It's no wonder why the Rebellion has weakened ships in their fleets not even the cruisers can't stand up a chance against a Star Destroyer.
it was one cruiser vs 3 star destroyers are you blind?
@@skehans0l049 no cause every time those cruisers goes up against those destroyers they get knocked down easily even though they are cruisers
@@RicardoPerez-rz8pu because the Moncalamari capital ships such as the mc80 liberties And all other moncala ships and cruisers/dreadnaughts even home 1 had redundant and repeating shield generators making them very hard to take down and far superior to star destroyers
@@__Nordic I'd still don't get it how does three destroyers are able to take down three Criusers if the cruisers have hardened shields and thick armor
If I recall Mon Calamari cruisers had very strong shielding
For the Empire!!
Dude that was nasty!
Why would starships fight in an atmosphere? As soon as your engines fail it's all over.
Gunshipping mostly, so they can provide support to ground forces, orbital bombardment only works with Turbolasers, missiles and strong enough blaster cannons. Something rebel ships do not have in number or at all as they use Laser type weapons so the atmosphere would vastly weaken or stop the laser from doing the damage it needs to do, forcing them lower.
Star destroyers have 40 turbolaser batteries....ONLY fires one at a time...
HOw in God's name are they missing those shots? Is the barn not big enough?
Only Imperial stormtroopers are so precise.
Honestly the crew might have survived that at least some
nice work
Oh
more scrap for ppl from Jakku to pick up... LMAO!!!
Trus knp? Ada masalah apalagi?
3:43
Aku disuruh stop apa? Ga ngerti
What game
Kok marah marah?
Aku stupid?
Oh?
Guess there is no such thing as an AA screen in Star Wars...might want to take a hard look at the Galactica reboot for more accurate ship to ship combat.
there is but for some reason nobody ever uses it. Like these things have a lot of point defense but they hurr durr a lot.
Star Wars is fantasy not science fiction, I mean come on, they have wizards.
*spoiler* space nazis get defeated by space teddy bears. Let's see a BSG episode like that.
@-@...not Ay-tea, Ay-tea, ya millennial twits.
Gods these games stunk, EA really does make the worst games. The MC-80 line as a whole had the best Mon Calamari shielding available at that time. I counted 9 shots, with a big gap between 7 and 8. The ISD II Star destroyer can not only completely destroy the shielding of a MC-80 and do enough damage to make it fall from low orbit in 9 rounds. Not to mention the fact that the ISD II is above the MC-80, preventing its largest cannons from firing on the target. All in all EA sucks at making games.
Bro this is a background event to enhance ambience who cares
Silence nerd who cares about the background scenery of a fucking multi-player game
Jesus its just a background ambience like bro get some bitches
you also forget that it also had Ties more than likely peppering it and bombarding it with torpedoes
This feels so much more realistic, form the slower lasers, the accurate falling, the raw power of a star destroyer,. The rebellion not having plot armour and losing lol
@Mister Majestic plot Armour
@Mister Majestic they do tho
@Mister Majestic tell me I forgot
@@aidencepil8604 you forgor 💀
@@aidencepil8604 when forgor
And now that crashed ship will be used as a command center for the ground battle
About as effective as “sinking” the Tirpitz in the fjord. “Oops! The water’s too shallow, guess we’ll just use this as a large AA platform, now!”
Might as well use it for something
@@hazmatt3250 Tirpitz capsized soooo yeah cant use it for anything period
Actually, she'd be unusable due to raging internal fires, or be in a billion pieces as her munitions stores and reactors cook off....
One question, do you think it is possible to repair that MC80 and revive it?
Everyone here whining about this match up yes it was 3 star destroyers vs one liberty MC80 and small corvettes and frigates not fair. Yes Mon Calamari ships have super powerful shields and armour, Yes star destroyers have superior firepower your all right now shut up it’s a EA battlefront background battle 😅
People on the ground get seafood tonight
calamari
rip my fish brothers
If there’s one thing this game got right it was the attention to background details
felt ralistic exept for MC-80 being destroyed so fast 1 could stand(not destroy them but survive) those 3 star destroyers for a fair amount of time if something the nebulon-B and the CR-90 would have been taken down pretty fast
I don't get it. Thses are powerful capital ships with heavy weapons. Why aren't they maneuvering, coordinating fire? They're just sitting there!? Clearly I am not a member of the target audience.🤨
the Empire is doing what their ships are made to do, point all firepower forwards, the rebels are just a mixed bag, and many are not militarily adept. Thus, I think they tried to brute force it but ignored the fact the Star Destroyer is built for front on engagements.
Semua udah bergerak dilapangan kok pada marah sih?
Loh kan mereka yg mau kebumi. Siapa suruh kesini?
How was this done?
It would have been cooler if the star destroyer came In instantly with the light speed sound
Not possible; the hyperspace safeties would kick in when it was far outside the atmosphere, otherwise it would ram into the planet its meant to conquer at a damn fast pace and kill everything on its surface.
@@Shinzon23 when I say that I mean come out if hyperspace in space. And everything does not have to pay attention to lore
@@Shinzon23 i mean that one way to conquer a planet.
Stop apaan?
Knp lagi?
Laser not traveling at the speed of light, hmmm.
It's plasma
It was day time so there was more light to travel through, like a traffic jam.
@@LTButtstrong lmao
stop calling them lasers
@@Raooka Can't spell Blaster without laser. And they're called lasers in-universe.
So very, very cool!!
What Battlefront is this?
Battlefront 1 2015, battlefront 2 doesn't have these kind of scenes, only ground battles in the distance
1
Bf1 or 2 ?
Bf1
@@jonessa011yt7 yeah
The audio and vid don't match. They keep mentioning AT-ATs and Walkers but you're showing ships. It would sound better if we heard chatter between the ships, even if in the background.
That's because this is from a walker assault match