قیصر احمد راجا کو میں سال ڈیڑھ سال سے سن رہا ہوں ان کے جوابات ہمیشہ مد مقابل کو لاجواب کر دیتے ہیں لیکن کل کے ڈیبیٹ میں جو انہوں اس معاملے پر جواب دیا قسم سے دل ہی خوش ہو گیا, زبردست یار ❤😊😂
I saw already full debate and I was wondering yahan is nay jab baat ko ghumaya or isay khud bhi nahi pata tha kay mein kiya bol raha hun ...Well needed clip
Qaiser bhai aap jis raftaar se awam aur molvi tabqay ka dil jeet rahe hain to mujhe apse dar sa lagne laga hai... khudara apni hifazat karain aur apna khayal rakhen.. hum ap jese heeray pehle bhi kho chuke hain.. Allah apka hami o nasir ho... apko, mufti yasir, amir haq, asim iftikhar, saheeh muslim, in logon ko dekh kar dil khush hojata hai...
Secularism is a bhola bacha jiska practicality se koi waasta nhi hai. I've watched whole debate video and his arguments were only aqeeda aqeeda and baseless arguments.
Itna extreme mat hoja bhai... Secularism 100% bakwaas nahi. Iskii kuch kuch khubi bhi hai. Nuksaan sirf yeh Culture aur religion ko deta hai. Aur khaas karke Majority religion ko pareshan kar deta hai. Isiliye pakistanis are opposing this, because secularism, Feminism, liberalism all leads Public to Atheism. This is the main problem. Warna Secularism seh Pakistaniyo ko koi problem nahi. Secular pakistan meh bhi Muslims Survive kar lenge....Thori dikkat hogi new Government policies ki wajah seh...lekin utna bardast ho jaayega, Imaan mazboot hona chahiye bas.
@@MR.FlyingMonkey mola ko je he hind me sajde ki ijazat , nadan ye samajhta he islam he azad. Secularism se apko kisne kaha koi masla nai, islam ke ilawa har nizam se masla he or is baat ka inkar karne wala kafir he, is baat me ksi ko koi shak he to vo bhi kafir. he
@@MR.FlyingMonkey bhai secular ki baate achi hai but practical nhi hai Secularism me Aap apne qanoon banate ho isski wajah se quran ke rules nullify hojate hai aur usski ahemiyat kam hojati hai phir Aap kiu hi amal kroge usspe isski aur secularism insaan ko collectivism se nikaal ke personal interest me leke jaata hai jaha pe bas interest priority hoti hai aur hum dekh rhe hai duniya me 2. Secularism me rules set humans krte hai aur har human ke paas complete knowledge nahi hai aur tamam humans ke paas nhi hai hum ghatiya krte hai toh seeekhte hai. Aur maan lo ki tamam knowledge wale ikattha hogye toh insaan apne aur apne group ke interest ko hi dhyan me rakh ke policy banayega aur apne Mann mutabiq legal illegal Jo hum dekh rhe hai aajkal Jo personal interest pe policy making hoti hai and kaise kuch log crores logo ki policy banate hai aur unki zindagi ko mutassir krte hai. Aajka nizam Jo hai woh humare former aaqao ka banaya hua hai unke rules har kisi me taleem se leke maashiayat tak unki kheechi hui lakeero pe humari taqdeer ki lakeere tika rakhi hai kyu maane hum unko Humara apna nizam hai humara apna mashiyati siyasiyati nizam hai. Aur ironically Europe apne nizam ko badal rha hai samajhdar woh hai Jo ghalti krke seekh ta hai aur hoshiyar woh hai Jo dusro ki ghalti se seekhta hai. Hume ghalti se seekhne ki bajaye dusro ki ghalti se seekhni chahiye humare paas case studies maujood hai warna yeh ghatiyo ki bhugtan barso tak generations ko krna padegi jaise waha horha.
@@readmydescription5533 maja aa gaya kafir wala point sunke.. agar koi secularism ko support karega toh Kafir hi hoga.. Kafir kya hota h ... I hope Kafir hona koi galat baat toh nahi h
Konse dalaail ke aage?? Farnood claims over claims(dawaa barae dawaa) kar raha tha... claim ke lie evidence hota hei. Par farnood claim(daawa) ke lie ek aur claim kar raha tha🤣. Kabhi wo naya nukta utha raha tha. Apna ek bhi nukta us ne complete nhi kiya. Aur haan... Farnood nei especially Quran ki different versions ke baare mei jo daawa kiya us par daleel ab bhi farnood par Qarz hei🙏. Jab kissi baat ka reference nhi to us par claim kar ke phir chalang 🏃💨 lagana aapke poore muqadmei ko ek joker 🤡 banata hei.
اچھا مطلب خود ہی اک در پہ میں نے دستک دی خود ہی لڑکا سا میں نکل آیا۔ کہیں کی اینٹ اور کہیں کا روڑا جمع کر کے جو بھائی صاحب بان متی کا کنبہ جوڑ رہے ہیں، اس کی ترتیب تو ایک آدھ دن میں سیدھی ہو ہی جائے گی، مگر فی الحال ایک خیال ذہن میں آرہا ہے 'یوٹیوب کو کمائی کا بنیادی ذریعہ نہیں بنانا چاہیے' 🥳 (فرنود عالم کے فیسبک وال سے)
Yahi hota hai jab aap exam seh pehle revision nahi karte. Ya jab Aap sirf Rot learning karte ho😂. Jab Sawal thora Out of syllabus ho jaata hai toh Takleef Face par dikhti hai😂😂
The provision that allows a handful of people to control every law is : "The principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance, and social justice, AS ENUNCIATED BY ISLAM, shall be fully observed." This inocuous looking provision is very dangerous. Who decides that whether some law is "AS ENUNCIATED BY ISLAM" or not? The Federal Shariat Court is the outcome of such this sordid provision. If any law is not found according to their liking they can strike it down.
similarly if it is written the principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice shall be fully observed, then the question may be asked which principles whose principles ??? and if you write the principles of UN Charter or basic human rights widely accepted then the UN and other agencies which are head of those organizations formulating those rights some of which support Israeli genocide and some support Palestine. freedom then which freedom ? (one which allows you to criticize any other religion nomatter whichever it is but doesn't allow you to criticize the president or PM )? Apply your critique in one way or another you are giving your decision to humans then what's the difference (Note: I don't think principles by humans = principles by Islam (Allah))
@@muhammadaquib9974 There are two differences : 1. When you base your principles on a dogma (which all religions are) they are incapable of evolution. For example the inheritance rule of Quran is fundamentally misogynistic (and please don't give the argument that a woman also get share from her husband, which is ridiculous in todays age). You can't even argue for a change in the laws because it is suppose to have been sent from the heavens. You don't realise the insidious nature of adopting a dogma like this because we have been brainwashed into thinking that everything is perfect in Islam. 2. When you bring religion into the context the membership of the group that is allowed to interprets those principles becomes limited and exclusive. Would people in Pakistan allow someone like Justice Cornelius to interpret laws related to islam? You are inevitably going to end up with a clique of Mullahs who will directly or indirectly control the interpretation. This is what has happened in the case of UN. The UN cannot function because it has its own set of Mullahs (US, UK, Russia, etc). If that group was not present the UN would function fine. You should always question authority. The moment you stop doing that you will go the way Pakistan has.
@@omarkhan3256 brother firstly the misogynistic part is not in the Quran (yeah but men =more authority=more responsibility ) for eg if you are responsible for your car for fines and penalties if it parks in a place of no parking then atleast you must have the authority to control your car similarly cheerypicking one aspect of one's role will always lead to chaos secondly you are contradicting yourself my brother Bcz the countries you mention as Mullas are itself the most secular countries in the world I would say one of the most advanced secular countries then what I was saying?? You are proving my point . If you give your rights to any other human being then you are giving him absolute power and absolute power corrupts absolutely . Moreover, you can't let yourself control yourself fully otherwise you would not do things which are necessary for eg basic basic thing would I eat a zinger buuger and snacks always or a perfect diet comprising of vegetables, beef,mutton,chicken? that's when the argument comes into place and I am saying that no one has forbade me or you to learn the religion .What are they calling themselves "followers of Quran and Sunnah" ? we ourselves can read from the most authentic narrations and explanations from the earliest most reliable people of Islam (i,e the companions and the first few generations after it ) when we have quran and sunnah atleast a base objective which you can't deny either then those "mullahs" would have to prove us wrong or they themselves would be humiliated. Read history of the so called secularism the same argument that Mullahs are representatives and they do evil so Islam is evil( bcz they mold Quran and Sunnah to benefit them ) Be a skeptic then if a secular does something evil invades countries and justifies it using the word terrorism (supposedly international law defined) then secularism is evil . Moreover, not a couple of centuries ago read the history of secular govts you will se where the problem comes into play...
@@muhammadaquib9974 yes it is in the Quran, for example the inheritance law is against women (and please don't try to tell me that the wife gets share from the husband because that is so lame, a women has to wait till her husbands death to get equal share and what if the father is super rich and the husband is poor). Responsiblity for your car? really that is the argument you came up with? Now you are equating women with property? Plus who decides that men should have more responsibility? There is no cherypicking you have just been brought up in a rigid patriarchal society and you can't get the bias out of your head. The islamic laws could be considered revolutionary for their time but now they are just anachronistic dogmas that need to be changed. There are no "most authentic narrations" from the earliest period of Islam. You don't know your history yet. Try to find sources for early Islamic history (that is history recorded from that period by historians) and you will find that they are none. Two hundred years after Iranians (who had their own agenda of revenge from the arabs) gathered these so called hadees and narrations. That is why Iqbal said: Haqiqat Khurafat Mein Kho Gyi Ye Ummat Rawayat Mein Kho Gyi You don't have the "moral courage" to think for yourself yet, when you do that you will see that you require a 'reconstruction' of your beliefs. Let me tell you what Iqbal says about how you should think and behave: The question which confronts him today, and which is likely to confront other Muslim countries in the near future is whether the Law of Islam is capable of evolution - a question which will require great intellectual effort, and is sure to be answered in the affirmative, provided the world of Islam approaches it in the spirit of ‘Umar - the first critical and independent mind in Islam who, at the last moments of the Prophet, had the moral courage to utter these remarkable words: ‘The Book of God is sufficient for us'. Quran does provide basic principles, which are the same every where so nothing new there. The important point is that you need to evolve. Your grasp of world affairs and various historic movements is also very weak. You are confusing secularism, with modern capitalist societies that are controlled by large coorporations. I have read the history and there is not problem with secularism, socialism, anarchism, marxism etc They are just ways of thinking that have come about through evolution and progress in human thought and are still evolving unlike your static way of thinking. Also no one is giving my rights to any other human being, I don't know where you got that ridiculous idea from along with the "absolute power" cliche and eating zinger burger? really? that is your example of not being able to control yourself? (actually that was funny in a monty pyhonesque way :) )
Pakistan ka first law minister maayus ho kar yahan se chala jata hai aur tareekh ne saabit kia k uska faisla thik tha Aur aap ko aap k sawal ka exact jawab na milne par kisi fataahyaani ka ehsaas ho rha hai Qaiser sahab?
fawad alam sahab yahi karty ja rahy thy k ic qanoon ke waja sy ya ho gaya wo ho gaya..or ya k pakistan ma minorities ke haqooq kam hain kam hain or jb pucha k kon sy haqooq kam hain to koi jawab nhi..
The question was out of syllabus😂
farnood shock, hats off you Qaiser sahab❤🇮🇳
Wahh re gddarr kaumm 😮
@@prashant-cg9mk नियोगी पुत्र😂
@@mdsami85 😂😂
@@mdsami85gah dayum bro, you grilled him with that 😂
قیصر احمد راجا کو میں سال ڈیڑھ سال سے سن رہا ہوں ان کے جوابات ہمیشہ مد مقابل کو لاجواب کر دیتے ہیں لیکن کل کے ڈیبیٹ میں جو انہوں اس معاملے پر جواب دیا قسم سے دل ہی خوش ہو گیا, زبردست یار ❤😊😂
راجستھان بھارت سے بے حد پیار قبول فرمائیں❤
Interview may jab out of course question ajai to asi hee halat hoti hay😂😂😂😂😂
Yeh Ghar jaake roye ga toh nahi ?
Mujhe Farnood bhai ki Boht fikar ho rahi hai 😢
Tension meh kahi kuch galat na bolde 😢
@@MR.FlyingMonkey 😜😜
Farnood Hanood ho geya
آئیں بائیں شائیں ۔ مگر سوال کا جواب نہیں آیا ۔ اگر آپ کو سوال کا جواب اس میں سے ملا ہو تو ذرا مجھے سمجھادیں ۔ 😅
@@anasser748 😜😜😜😜
The intellect level of liberal way of talking without evidence😂
Qasier ahmed raja love you sir.May Allah bless you and protect you!Ameen
جمعیت کو اس ڈبیٹ پر سلام ۔
قیصر راجہ صاحب لبرلز کو بہت عمدگی سے ٹریٹ اور ٹوٹ کلین بولڈ کرتے ہین۔
Allah apko apni deen ki sarbulandi k lye u hee sar buland rakhay ameen.
YOU SHOULD THINK TWICE BEFORE SITTING IN FRONT OF MR. QAISER RAJA
Knowledge of qaisar raja sahab is on another level
This is just Allah's Taufeeq😊
صدقے جاواں قیصر صاحب
I saw already full debate and I was wondering yahan is nay jab baat ko ghumaya or isay khud bhi nahi pata tha kay mein kiya bol raha hun ...Well needed clip
Qaiser bhai Rocked🎉🎯
Farnood Alam Shocked😢🤣
Amazing work Raja sahab. Keep it up ❤
You are role model when you deal with secular thoughts
Only when he deals with seculars?
Qaisar ahmad raja sir Love you❤
جزاک اللہ خیرا و احسن الجزاء ❤️
बहुत जबरदस्त धुलाई माशा अल्लाह
Qaiser bhai aap jis raftaar se awam aur molvi tabqay ka dil jeet rahe hain to mujhe apse dar sa lagne laga hai... khudara apni hifazat karain aur apna khayal rakhen.. hum ap jese heeray pehle bhi kho chuke hain.. Allah apka hami o nasir ho... apko, mufti yasir, amir haq, asim iftikhar, saheeh muslim, in logon ko dekh kar dil khush hojata hai...
بہترین قیصر صاحب
اللہ آپکی حفاظت فرمائے قیصر صاحب آمین
May Allah bless you
Qaiser Sb
Ameen
دل ہی خوش ہو گیا, زبردست یار
Bht khoob qaiser sahab 👍
Haq ki jeet hogi InshaAllah.
Confused seculars....all over...always....running away...😂
Brilliant Job Qaisar sb
Amazing response sir ❤
MashaAllah Qaiser Ahmed Raja Sahab, brilliant rebuttals
لاجواب تو قیصر راجہ نظر آتے ہیں۔
Qaiser Bhai zindabad zindabad zindabad ❤❤❤❤❤
Love you sir. Allah apko lambi umar ata farmaye.
i am speechless at the victory of Raja sb?
Allah SBWT apko salamat rakhe Ameen
Amazing Qaiser sahab 👍💪
قیصر بھائی! آپ نے اچھا خاصا اس کو لا جواب کر دیا تھا لیکن ماڈریٹر نے بیچ میں ٹانگ اڑا کے سارا ردھم ہی توڑ دیا۔ یہ بہت بری طرح پھنس گیا تھا۔
Kisi na to ass bachani hote ha
First view
Raja sab thanks for coming to IIUI
Hope you'll return soon❤❤
ماشااللہ
سیکولرز کو اس سے زیادہ مدلل علمی جواب پاکستان میں شائد ھی کوئی دے سکتا
اللہ آپ کی حفاظت فرمائے
Sahi bat hy mai ne Sari debate suni hy farnood sahib kisi bat ka bhi jawab nahi De sakay
Qaiser bhai as usual rocks.. Request him not to skip weekly streams
Good job Qaiser Ahmed Raja sahab
Jzak Allah o Khairan ❤
I am sure Farnood doesn't know the negative impacts of the 18th amendment.
Ma Sha Allah
Well done brother Qaiser 👏
ALLAH HU AKBAR
Well done Qaiser bhai
Qaiser Sahab ❤
Intellectual sawal keh raha tha puchne ko....qaiser bhai ne pooch lia to survey yaad agya
Love you ho gaya qasir bahi❤
Zabardast Qasier bhahi 👍
Qaiser raja❤❤
Masha Allah bohat khub
دیسی لبرلز کے جوڑوں میں بیٹھ گئے ہیں جناب ❤❤
MashAllah
Qaiser Bhai❤️
But I am not understand your writing due to urdu.
🇧🇩❤️🇵🇰
The title is 'Farnood Alam clueless on objectives resolution (Qarardad e Maqasid).
Gud job 👌🏻Quasir Sb
پروگرام تو ور گیا
👍
i think farnood alam gave his answer at the end.
Hats off sirr❤❤❤❤❤
🤣🤣🤣 thats there intellectual level 🤔
A lot of qaiser Ahmad raja sahb ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Best response
Secularism is a bhola bacha jiska practicality se koi waasta nhi hai.
I've watched whole debate video and his arguments were only aqeeda aqeeda and baseless arguments.
True secularism is satanism
Itna extreme mat hoja bhai... Secularism 100% bakwaas nahi. Iskii kuch kuch khubi bhi hai.
Nuksaan sirf yeh Culture aur religion ko deta hai.
Aur khaas karke Majority religion ko pareshan kar deta hai.
Isiliye pakistanis are opposing this, because secularism, Feminism, liberalism all leads Public to Atheism.
This is the main problem.
Warna Secularism seh Pakistaniyo ko koi problem nahi. Secular pakistan meh bhi Muslims Survive kar lenge....Thori dikkat hogi new Government policies ki wajah seh...lekin utna bardast ho jaayega, Imaan mazboot hona chahiye bas.
@@MR.FlyingMonkey mola ko je he hind me sajde ki ijazat , nadan ye samajhta he islam he azad.
Secularism se apko kisne kaha koi masla nai, islam ke ilawa har nizam se masla he or is baat ka inkar karne wala kafir he, is baat me ksi ko koi shak he to vo bhi kafir. he
@@MR.FlyingMonkey bhai secular ki baate achi hai but practical nhi hai
Secularism me Aap apne qanoon banate ho isski wajah se quran ke rules nullify hojate hai aur usski ahemiyat kam hojati hai phir Aap kiu hi amal kroge usspe isski aur secularism insaan ko collectivism se nikaal ke personal interest me leke jaata hai jaha pe bas interest priority hoti hai aur hum dekh rhe hai duniya me
2. Secularism me rules set humans krte hai aur har human ke paas complete knowledge nahi hai aur tamam humans ke paas nhi hai hum ghatiya krte hai toh seeekhte hai. Aur maan lo ki tamam knowledge wale ikattha hogye toh insaan apne aur apne group ke interest ko hi dhyan me rakh ke policy banayega aur apne Mann mutabiq legal illegal Jo hum dekh rhe hai aajkal Jo personal interest pe policy making hoti hai and kaise kuch log crores logo ki policy banate hai aur unki zindagi ko mutassir krte hai.
Aajka nizam Jo hai woh humare former aaqao ka banaya hua hai unke rules har kisi me taleem se leke maashiayat tak unki kheechi hui lakeero pe humari taqdeer ki lakeere tika rakhi hai kyu maane hum unko
Humara apna nizam hai humara apna mashiyati siyasiyati nizam hai. Aur ironically Europe apne nizam ko badal rha hai samajhdar woh hai Jo ghalti krke seekh ta hai aur hoshiyar woh hai Jo dusro ki ghalti se seekhta hai. Hume ghalti se seekhne ki bajaye dusro ki ghalti se seekhni chahiye humare paas case studies maujood hai warna yeh ghatiyo ki bhugtan barso tak generations ko krna padegi jaise waha horha.
@@readmydescription5533 maja aa gaya kafir wala point sunke.. agar koi secularism ko support karega toh Kafir hi hoga.. Kafir kya hota h ... I hope Kafir hona koi galat baat toh nahi h
Sir kabi Peshawar ana howa to Insha Allah💮 zaroor mulaqat hogi.
The question was out of syllabus 😂😂😂😂😂😅😅😅😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😅😂😅😂
❤
Love u qaiser sahab❤️❤️
ماشاء اللہ
Farnood sb ko na islamic laws ka mukamal ilam hy or na hi secularism ka
Qaiser Bhai 😂🔥 My Man 😂😂😂😂
yes the person is right
Love you❤ farnood alam
Raja Shb ✌️
Level!
Sir u r ❤
Epistematic rupture. Yeh actually yhi nahi chahta k Allah ki hakmiat e aala ho simple. Agr is baat ko accept kr lein to itna wqt hi zaya na ho.
فرنود صاحب کو باربار ٹوک کر تمام سیشن کا مزہ کرکرا کر دیا
Qaiser bhai k concentration check kren zra
MASHALLAH
aik dum focusss
haqmiyat sirf Allah ki ho gi..is sy kya sabit ho rha k muslman jo Allah ko manty vohi haqim hon gy... bki koi haqim nhi ho skta zahir ha
Qaiser bhai kya mori faad rhy ho wah sher ho bhai kasam se. 😂
“Koi hawala nahin”, Ustadh Qaiser Ahmad Raja (حَفِظَهُ اللّٰهَ تعاٰليٰ) checkmates Mr. Farnood Alam.
Kaun hein yeh loag! Kahan se aate hein yeh loag!
Lajawab tau aap rahy hain Farnood sahab k dalaail k aagy.
Konse dalaail ke aage?? Farnood claims over claims(dawaa barae dawaa) kar raha tha... claim ke lie evidence hota hei. Par farnood claim(daawa) ke lie ek aur claim kar raha tha🤣. Kabhi wo naya nukta utha raha tha. Apna ek bhi nukta us ne complete nhi kiya.
Aur haan... Farnood nei especially Quran ki different versions ke baare mei jo daawa kiya us par daleel ab bhi farnood par Qarz hei🙏.
Jab kissi baat ka reference nhi to us par claim kar ke phir chalang 🏃💨 lagana aapke poore muqadmei ko ek joker 🤡 banata hei.
O yaar itne jaldi comment nhi karta
liberal ka pas koi dalil nhi bus tan tan
Bhai Maine iss seculer ( mulhid) ki pura debeat dekha hai. Yah mulhid shirf acchi urdu Bolne ki taiyari kar ke aaya tha aur kuch bhi nahi. 😊
A ganty 50 minutes ki debate main raja ko sirf qarar dade Pakistan waly clip main hi point nzr aya 😂😂😂😂😂
Gulli beta raja g k sath masti nai😂
اچھا مطلب
خود ہی اک در پہ میں نے دستک دی
خود ہی لڑکا سا میں نکل آیا۔
کہیں کی اینٹ اور کہیں کا روڑا جمع کر کے جو بھائی صاحب بان متی کا کنبہ جوڑ رہے ہیں، اس کی ترتیب تو ایک آدھ دن میں سیدھی ہو ہی جائے گی، مگر فی الحال ایک خیال ذہن میں آرہا ہے
'یوٹیوب کو کمائی کا بنیادی ذریعہ نہیں بنانا چاہیے' 🥳
(فرنود عالم کے فیسبک وال سے)
جب امتحان میں کوئی جواب نہیں آتا تو فرنود صاحب جیسی لمبی کرنی پڑتی ہے۔
Bara bay sharam banda hay yar😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
What about Dark Knight Raises❤
Yahi hota hai jab aap exam seh pehle revision nahi karte.
Ya jab Aap sirf Rot learning karte ho😂.
Jab Sawal thora Out of syllabus ho jaata hai toh Takleef Face par dikhti hai😂😂
Farnood ki bateen Raja saab k uper sy ja rehi hain 😂
Is ko to samj he nahi Aya k swal kia h😂 soach ley Jo in jeso k peechy chalty h
The provision that allows a handful of people to control every law is :
"The principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance, and social justice, AS ENUNCIATED BY ISLAM, shall be fully observed."
This inocuous looking provision is very dangerous. Who decides that whether some law is "AS ENUNCIATED BY ISLAM" or not? The Federal Shariat Court is the outcome of such this sordid provision. If any law is not found according to their liking they can strike it down.
similarly if it is written the principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice shall be fully observed, then the question may be asked which principles whose principles ??? and if you write the principles of UN Charter or basic human rights widely accepted then the UN and other agencies which are head of those organizations formulating those rights some of which support Israeli genocide and some support Palestine. freedom then which freedom ? (one which allows you to criticize any other religion nomatter whichever it is but doesn't allow you to criticize the president or PM )? Apply your critique in one way or another you are giving your decision to humans then what's the difference (Note: I don't think principles by humans = principles by Islam (Allah))
@@muhammadaquib9974 There are two differences :
1. When you base your principles on a dogma (which all religions are) they are incapable of evolution. For example the inheritance rule of Quran is fundamentally misogynistic (and please don't give the argument that a woman also get share from her husband, which is ridiculous in todays age). You can't even argue for a change in the laws because it is suppose to have been sent from the heavens. You don't realise the insidious nature of adopting a dogma like this because we have been brainwashed into thinking that everything is perfect in Islam.
2. When you bring religion into the context the membership of the group that is allowed to interprets those principles becomes limited and exclusive. Would people in Pakistan allow someone like Justice Cornelius to interpret laws related to islam? You are inevitably going to end up with a clique of Mullahs who will directly or indirectly control the interpretation. This is what has happened in the case of UN. The UN cannot function because it has its own set of Mullahs (US, UK, Russia, etc). If that group was not present the UN would function fine.
You should always question authority. The moment you stop doing that you will go the way Pakistan has.
@@omarkhan3256 brother firstly the misogynistic part is not in the Quran (yeah but men =more authority=more responsibility ) for eg if you are responsible for your car for fines and penalties if it parks in a place of no parking then atleast you must have the authority to control your car similarly cheerypicking one aspect of one's role will always lead to chaos
secondly you are contradicting yourself my brother Bcz the countries you mention as Mullas are itself the most secular countries in the world I would say one of the most advanced secular countries then what I was saying?? You are proving my point . If you give your rights to any other human being then you are giving him absolute power and absolute power corrupts absolutely . Moreover, you can't let yourself control yourself fully otherwise you would not do things which are necessary for eg basic basic thing would I eat a zinger buuger and snacks always or a perfect diet comprising of vegetables, beef,mutton,chicken?
that's when the argument comes into place and I am saying that no one has forbade me or you to learn the religion .What are they calling themselves "followers of Quran and Sunnah" ? we ourselves can read from the most authentic narrations and explanations from the earliest most reliable people of Islam (i,e the companions and the first few generations after it ) when we have quran and sunnah atleast a base objective which you can't deny either then those "mullahs" would have to prove us wrong or they themselves would be humiliated. Read history of the so called secularism the same argument that Mullahs are representatives and they do evil so Islam is evil( bcz they mold Quran and Sunnah to benefit them ) Be a skeptic then if a secular does something evil invades countries and justifies it using the word terrorism (supposedly international law defined) then secularism is evil . Moreover, not a couple of centuries ago read the history of secular govts you will se where the problem comes into play...
@@muhammadaquib9974 yes it is in the Quran, for example the inheritance law is against women (and please don't try to tell me that the wife gets share from the husband because that is so lame, a women has to wait till her husbands death to get equal share and what if the father is super rich and the husband is poor). Responsiblity for your car? really that is the argument you came up with? Now you are equating women with property? Plus who decides that men should have more responsibility? There is no cherypicking you have just been brought up in a rigid patriarchal society and you can't get the bias out of your head. The islamic laws could be considered revolutionary for their time but now they are just anachronistic dogmas that need to be changed. There are no "most authentic narrations" from the earliest period of Islam. You don't know your history yet. Try to find sources for early Islamic history (that is history recorded from that period by historians) and you will find that they are none. Two hundred years after Iranians (who had their own agenda of revenge from the arabs) gathered these so called hadees and narrations. That is why Iqbal said:
Haqiqat Khurafat Mein Kho Gyi
Ye Ummat Rawayat Mein Kho Gyi
You don't have the "moral courage" to think for yourself yet, when you do that you will see that you require a 'reconstruction' of your beliefs. Let me tell you what Iqbal says about how you should think and behave:
The question which confronts him today, and which is likely to confront
other Muslim countries in the near future is whether the Law of Islam is
capable of evolution - a question which will require great intellectual
effort, and is sure to be answered in the affirmative, provided the world
of Islam approaches it in the spirit of ‘Umar - the first critical and
independent mind in Islam who, at the last moments of the Prophet,
had the moral courage to utter these remarkable words:
‘The Book of God is sufficient for us'.
Quran does provide basic principles, which are the same every where so nothing new there. The important point is that you need to evolve. Your grasp of world affairs and various historic movements is also very weak. You are confusing secularism, with modern capitalist societies that are controlled by large coorporations. I have read the history and there is not problem with secularism, socialism, anarchism, marxism etc They are just ways of thinking that have come about through evolution and progress in human thought and are still evolving unlike your static way of thinking. Also no one is giving my rights to any other human being, I don't know where you got that ridiculous idea from along with the "absolute power" cliche and eating zinger burger? really? that is your example of not being able to control yourself? (actually that was funny in a monty pyhonesque way :) )
Who was Sir zafarullah khan who made lahore resolution ..... Kadyani
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Pakistan ka first law minister maayus ho kar yahan se chala jata hai aur tareekh ne saabit kia k uska faisla thik tha
Aur aap ko aap k sawal ka exact jawab na milne par kisi fataahyaani ka ehsaas ho rha hai Qaiser sahab?
fawad alam sahab yahi karty ja rahy thy k ic qanoon ke waja sy ya ho gaya wo ho gaya..or ya k pakistan ma minorities ke haqooq kam hain kam hain or jb pucha k kon sy haqooq kam hain to koi jawab nhi..