@Kaden Stanton Wow! I know this sounds silly but that's actually not that bad in my opinion. If I had more money I'd probably buy the pieces and build it.
Wait a minute, that can't be right. I know your probably joking, but there was a geonosian starfighter that was probably roughly 300 parts. There were probably at least 10,000 of those sets made, and seeing as they were almost entirely brown, there would be 3,000,000 brown bricks at least.
@@Infinit0s you can make them yourself. Its not that hard, its just expensive but when you have enough money, space and time to build a minifig scale death star, that shouldn´t be the problem.
In my opinion the biggest flaw is it being an RC model. It would've worked out much better with an accurate approach to the model on form rather than function, with a fully fleshed out and detailed interior.
5:33 The first thing I thought of when I saw the cockpit was The Mandalorian hitting his head on the ceiling when he was in the Sandcrawler in Chapter 2 lol
I mean the AT-AT has weapons so it’ll probably blow up the sandcrawler before it could ram it. Sandcrawlers seem pretty slow, so ramming might not be the best strat anyway.
Sand crawlers are not slow in universe. Its definitely faster than a at-at. But an at-at does have empire grade weapons while the Sand crawler is essentially a trade vessel armed with nothing more than crew with blasters. Speaking of crew the Sand crawler has ALOT more. Basically it would come down to distance & environment. If their far away from eachother easy win for at-at as they excell at slow Aproaches, If their close to each other the Sand crawler would most likely win. And for environment mountains could provide cover and despite it being in the name at-ats are not all terrain, so there are many types of terrain that would either hinder or prevent it moving. In most situations with a environment not native to either the Sand crawler wins due to treads being better than legs. But! you don't care about all that, *TLDR:* You place the two vehicles at a fair distance in an open flat battlefield, Sand crawler wins more often. It will tank the first volley from the at-at, close the distance, & ram the at-at. the at-at might hit a critical system first volley, or not fall over from the ram, But I'd say like 87% of the time Sand crawler wins.
For your "AT-AT vs Sandcrawler" debate : AT-AT. That's a military walker with surprising speed (60km/h top speed) against a slow mining crawler (30km/h top speed) (Source : Wookieepedia). As for armament, the Sandcrawler has nothing except the jawas inside. The AT-AT has twin laser cannons. Of course, give the Jawas about ten minutes unopposed, and they'll have the AT-AT disabled and its guts thrown across the desert. Good thing there are stormtroopers aboard to prevent that.
@@proxy1359 Have the good folks at The Citadel in Mad Max take a look at both vehicles and you'll get a 48mph galloping AT-AT with 36 assault cannons and a blown Sandcrawler that does the quarter mile in just under 9 seconds.
AT-AT V.S. Sandcrawler: A couple of good rams from the Sandcrawler would do the job, But, the AT-AT would stop the Sandcrawler dead in its tracks before it even gets close using its Laser Canons.
I don't believe so, the crawler is a gritty mining rig, but i don't think that the crawler would win with a ram as its command center would probably cave in and both would stop having good times.
The crawler would win. Well it depends in the snow or on tatooine or jakku the crawler would win with just some rams but in foresty areas the at at claps
@@friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351 the sand crawler was never built for combat, so outside of its hull, it has no protective capabilities allowing it to close the distance between it and the at-at, so with the at-at's heavy turbolaser cannons, a well aimed shot to the command center would stop the crawler dead in its tracks, and then it's just a matter of dealing with 4 foot angry jawa's.
If I was Lego, I would hire those guys who design this for sure. What a masterpiece. The closer to realism Lego gets the more sells to adults. There are serious collectors there all over the world that could pay 1500-2000$ for it, if it was official release.
UsernameGeri you know once one is sold, it's super easy for that person to sell copies or give it out for free right? As someone who has worked on multiple MOCs, I know how time consuming it is and understand the price for instructions. Especially on something so massive. If you're so bitter about the price, don't buy it. But it's clear you don't appreciate other people's time and effort.
Tracytron 54321 he never said what? I'm sure they'll sell more than one and maybe even a few hundred, maybe. It's a 12000 piece set. It is complicated. Figuring out the structure that will support all that is extremely difficult and takes multiple attempts at the engineering, etc. Their prices are quite fair. Keep in mind the price pays the designer and Brickvault.
Hey it takes 1 person to leak it online and there goes there $ if they want that to happen then keep it 60$ if they want people to buy and now get a leaked copy make it 10$
Kyle Stavrou- well despite the structure, I think there is a lot of space left in the main hull Pretty much all the interior detail consisted of was a cockpit and wall area behind the ramp
atat vs sandcrawler..... if the sandcrwaler could ram the at at before it can fire its heavier weaponry the sandcrwaler might win but the sandcrwaler is a big clump if rust so a couple of heavy atat rounds would probably blow it apart
For an AT-AT vs Sandcrawler battle, it depends entirely on the distance between the two. If they are far apart, the walker wins easily as the sandcrawler has no ranged weapons. The only chance for the crawler would be a close quarters fight. At that range, it should be able to ram the AT-AT and knock it over.
Are you crazy... A CR90 has 150m length, 49m width, 32m height!!! Minifigures are at approximatly 1:38 to 1:42 scale. At 1:40 scale the CR90 would be 3,75m long, 1,225m wide and 0,8m high.
Why would you advertise this as "minifig scale"? It is clearly smaller than the minifig scale. Just look at the picture you provided yourself at 5:14 and look at the cockpit all the way up. On the blueprint, you can see that each level of the cockpits could fit at least two dozen Jawas. On the model, at 5:56 there is a room only for four Jawas...Next, take a look at the ramp on the blueprint, again on 5:14 and you can see there is enough space width-wise at the top, most wide part of the ramp that it can hold again at least two dozen Jawas side by side. On the model, at 5:05, the ramp can barely fit 8 Jawas at the same section, width-wise. The model needs to be bigger at least 2 - 2.5 times than it is now to be called "minifig scale".
@@Kreeves33 Well, atm 9 people liked the comment, so at least they and those who understand the importance of correct proportions and scale, care. For the rest of you simpler folks who cannot see past the initial wow-look, i understand why you do not care about correct scale.
the more you look at this, the more you see this is actually just so genius. the clever use of pieces like wagon wheels and crossbows just blew me away.
Not a space weapons expert here, but I would think if you shot at the treads and made a good hit or two, the Sandcrawler would be disabled. Then the AT-AT could just take it's time shooting it to pieces. As the Jawa's came running out of a smoldering Crawler, you could just step on them like ants at a picnic. If some Tusken Raiders were some distance away, it would appear to them that the AT-AT was doing some sort of dance. Actually sounds kind of fun!
I would really like to build this thing, but i dont think my "pc" is able to work with the programs, and having to buy the parts seperatly sounds like preatty much effort and shipping cost, i would prefer being able to buy a printed version for more money and be able to buy all the parts for the moc, too. That way you know exactly what the moc costs and get it from one shop; and you do not have to buy the instruction and part list before knowing that the moc will not cost ~1700$ but ~2200$ due to shipping cost and part prices. At over 10000 pieces i do not want to be unsure about the endcost of a build.
That's all a tell tale, of you not being a big enough fan, not only of Star Wars, but of the Sandcrawler, Legos and the experience of building something so Star Wars aesthetic of that magnitude, otherwise you would be "chomping on the bit" sort of speak, dreaming at the chance of putting one of these together.
@@gaarcemail in my opinion having to pay 2000€ obly for the parts is ok, but to pay 1000€ for a computer that is able to show the instructions just isnt really what you want, and it has nothing to do with being a fan or not, is it really so hard to make a good product out of a fantastic thing like this? Yes i do not have had any lego for years, but the sandcrawler would be something you could have instead of a boring statue and would be a great puzzle to put together, so stop making big speaches that you are such a big lego fan that would pay 3000€ and that you know everthing about buying cheap parts..., because the average star wars fan just has no idea of how to do this and having to face instructions and programs another language also isnt that easy!
@@brainzmech2971 As you said its just our opinions. But what i wanted to point out is, that you're just paying to look at some instructions on a computer, well i mean, yeah, in your opinion, if you see it that way fine, but what about the hundreds of hours that these guys put into putting that data on a computer? And again if you don't care about compensating people for their hard work, but only what your physically going to get, fine, but some people, such as my self appreciate what they have done, because otherwise, i or others would (if we ever could) have to work hundreds of hours to figure how to do this. I would rather pay $60 and and not have to, that is all. Whether i have the money to do this or not, is besides that point, we are talking about whether it's worth it or not. To be honest, i am not so much a "great" fan of Star Wars, I have always love their art work. I think they where way ahead of their time. I was their on release and was very impressed, again, not by the story, but by the fantastic futuristic art work.
@@gaarcemail dude stfu. It's a overpriced con. I love star wars and lego. I have a huge collection and this guy is right. It's over priced for what it is. So is lego to be fair it's only plastic at the end of the day
This build is beautiful. The coloration hints at the Sandcrawler having a previous orange and silver paint scheme that has since deteriorated, rusting the exterior. It's universe-building in the way that it could imply that the Sandcrawlers had a previous function before ultimately being used for of Jawa scavenging operations.
We're talking about a model that would cost around $1200 if it was premade and sold in stores. Buying the pieces individually will probably cost a good bit more. Anyone who is worried about the $60 instructions probably isn't really interested in paying the $1500 to $2000 needed to get the parts to build it anyways.
AT-AT would win because in the first movie, Storm troopers crippled the Sandcrawler with BLASTERS! Few shots from the AT-AT to the treads, and that thing is a sitting duck!
skillmaster 3566 isn't that thing protected by multiple layers if steel? And besides even if it was destroyed, the sandcrawler would probably keep rolling, rolling fast
I think you're overestimating the Sandcrawler's mobility. An AT-AT would just blast away at it from range, then sidestep it before it got even close, if it was still running. It was originally made for mining, so it's not armoured and an AT-AT's cannons should have no trouble penetrating it.
I mean in ANH the Sandcrawler was downed by Imperial Troop blasters. I don't think this transport was built to withstand artillery considering it never really had to be exposed to battlefield vehicles. I'm sure the worst they had to deal with was tusken raider blasters.
I don't have a real problem with paying $60 for the instructions, my problem is I don't even know how much the parts would cost me to build the thing once I do pay $60 for instructions.
The estimate was 1700$, and some parts in reddish brown are very rare and expensive. But even without those you'll likely spend a ton on multiple shipments from bricklink, which could be very pricey depending on where you live. But compared to what freaking speculators ask for old retired UCS sets (falcon, tantive iv, star destroyers, death star II, etc.) this Sandcrawler is a steal.
Ryan Studios that’s just a battlefront thing, and it’s not even the at at doing the damage. The player simply calls in an orbital strike when using the at at, but it’s not one of the at ats actual weapons
At at would smash through sandcrawlers armour as the sandcrawler is an old mining vehicle, and it could target the sandcrawlers wheels and disable it and then just finish it off
3:05 actually the AT-AT is faster at 37 mph, the sand crawler can only go 19 mph, soo the AT-AT is faster, and it has actual weaponry, soo it can destroy the sandcrawler very easily, plus an ram would do nothing cuz the upside down slop, but would knock over the at at if it hit the side, but at front the cockpit would get destroyed.
The sand would fly into its joints and engine, stopping up the legs and causing the engine to overheat. Soon, the engine would catch fire, causing the fuel tank to explode, destroying it.
This is so cool! It’s so detailed! Wow! Could you guys make a playlist of all of your minifigure scale custom builds and stuff? I would love to see all of them in one place!
Yes, the pigment some colors are made of (reddish brown, but also burgundy and some lime green I think) makes the mold more fragile. Reddish brown is the worst case of it.
About the AT-AT debate: the sandcrawler was made to survive the harsh deserts of Tatooine, not for military purpose. At the very least, the AT-AT should be able to take out at least 1 set of treads, which would most likely cause the sandcrawler to become immobile (an absence of treads would mean that sand particles may be able to be trapped in the gear mechanisms, which would be a death sentence for the crawlers if their engine(s) are inter joined and connected to all wheels) Basically, the AT-AT is military and can shoot the treads, while the sandcrawler is a big metal target
dXb you realize how many potential hundreds of man hours went into the creation of both this model, and the process of refining the build into something that could be easily laid out via instructions, right? Given the amount of effort and time that was likely sunk into this build, 60 dollars for the instructions is more than reasonable for an undertaking of this scale.
@@lightningmcqueengaming7547 60 is not reasonable for instructions no matter how many hours you put it the instructions for something like this should be 30 max
Because it takes much work to detail the step-by-step instruction of 12000 pieces. If you don't have the money for the instructions then you don't have the money for the parts.
think about the 100s of hours that the designer put into the model, the price for the instructions is only a small portion of what the thing is really worth
5:10 that poor droid gets his eye banged on the door
Thats pretty sad
RIP
Then he falls off his studs lmao
A droid has fallen into the Sandcrawler on Tatooine
YEET!
For the price of a used car, you can buy a minifig scale sand crawler
Buy Fake lego
@@ismaels3471 it would fall apart fake is really bad
This honestly isn’t even close to mini fig scale. It’s very downsized
@@ismaels3471 Fake lego doesn't stick together very well. It's why lego isn't cheap, they test each piece to make sure it fits well with other pieces.
Soundwave superior
Total costs: Over 1700$ to build that thing
Why not.
Kaden Stanton legend
Wow I expected it to be even more!
My whole rent for a lego set. Neat
Kaden Stanton respect for you
@Kaden Stanton Wow! I know this sounds silly but that's actually not that bad in my opinion. If I had more money I'd probably buy the pieces and build it.
*If two more guys decide to build this thing, Lego will run out of brown bricks*
Why do I have the feeling we're gonna see someone build a multicolored monstrosity out of these instructions?
2 words: 3d printer
@@zero-ew8bf wouldn't really work
@@swety2962 only economically. You can print bricks.
Wait a minute, that can't be right. I know your probably joking, but there was a geonosian starfighter that was probably roughly 300 parts. There were probably at least 10,000 of those sets made, and seeing as they were almost entirely brown, there would be 3,000,000 brown bricks at least.
I want the death star in minifig scale
150Km / 1.80m * 4.0cm = 3.333Km diameter.
I think you may struggle to get the parts even if you collect all lego from around the world ;)
@@Infinit0s you can make them yourself. Its not that hard, its just expensive but when you have enough money, space and time to build a minifig scale death star, that shouldn´t be the problem.
That would be very expensive but also very cool
That will take them a while
@@berndarndt9924 why not make minifigures smaller
"Someone with too much time on their hands would even attempt to build this."
What about someone who just really loves Jawas?
Ewoks are better
Sith r bae
I feel so loved !
Awesome build. The reason that rust and wear are more common at the top, is because it is harder to access, being higher up.
I bet it being taller than most dunes around it doesn’t help with wind wear either
Here I was thinking that they just ran into a cliff face and got a little Tatooine natural landscape rub.
What the 2005 sand crawler felt like when I was 7 years old.😂
I saw this and thought “why’s he posting about the old sand crawler”
Bro same
That’s damn fact
In my opinion the biggest flaw is it being an RC model. It would've worked out much better with an accurate approach to the model on form rather than function, with a fully fleshed out and detailed interior.
Yes but how do you move it because it literally ways more than a German Shepherd
Same
Same. You could flesh out some interior areas with removable side panels.
Don't agree it would be to many pieces and probably no would buy it.
5:33 The first thing I thought of when I saw the cockpit was The Mandalorian hitting his head on the ceiling when he was in the Sandcrawler in Chapter 2 lol
I mean if you can’t afford 60 dollars for the instructions you’re definitely not going to be able to afford the parts
I mean I'd like to see the layout and complexity of the instructions before spending 2000 dollars on pieces from BrickLink.
Hands down one of the best Star Wars Lego creations I have ever seen. Made props to the designers and the builders. Again, WOW!
I mean the AT-AT has weapons so it’ll probably blow up the sandcrawler before it could ram it. Sandcrawlers seem pretty slow, so ramming might not be the best strat anyway.
"Release... the JAWAS!"
:D
Sand crawlers are not slow in universe. Its definitely faster than a at-at. But an at-at does have empire grade weapons while the Sand crawler is essentially a trade vessel armed with nothing more than crew with blasters. Speaking of crew the Sand crawler has ALOT more. Basically it would come down to distance & environment. If their far away from eachother easy win for at-at as they excell at slow Aproaches, If their close to each other the Sand crawler would most likely win. And for environment mountains could provide cover and despite it being in the name at-ats are not all terrain, so there are many types of terrain that would either hinder or prevent it moving. In most situations with a environment not native to either the Sand crawler wins due to treads being better than legs. But! you don't care about all that, *TLDR:* You place the two vehicles at a fair distance in an open flat battlefield, Sand crawler wins more often. It will tank the first volley from the at-at, close the distance, & ram the at-at. the at-at might hit a critical system first volley, or not fall over from the ram, But I'd say like 87% of the time Sand crawler wins.
I fear no man but that thing it scares me
The thing: dropping this masterpiece
The thing: losing ur 8 month old child in it
I've seen this power only once before, it didn't scared me than.
For your "AT-AT vs Sandcrawler" debate : AT-AT. That's a military walker with surprising speed (60km/h top speed) against a slow mining crawler (30km/h top speed) (Source : Wookieepedia).
As for armament, the Sandcrawler has nothing except the jawas inside. The AT-AT has twin laser cannons.
Of course, give the Jawas about ten minutes unopposed, and they'll have the AT-AT disabled and its guts thrown across the desert. Good thing there are stormtroopers aboard to prevent that.
Just run the AT-AT over.
@@merafirewing6591 how's it going to do that when it's getting fucked by heavy cannon fire
Jawas... Have shotguns.
Wait, imagine a modified war sandcrawler, basically a normal sandcrawler but with higher speed, more reliability, shields, and a bunch of guns.
@@proxy1359 Have the good folks at The Citadel in Mad Max take a look at both vehicles and you'll get a 48mph galloping AT-AT with 36 assault cannons and a blown Sandcrawler that does the quarter mile in just under 9 seconds.
Isn’t it so amazing that so much achievement have been created just from this simple toy? It’s evolved since 1940-2019!!!
WRONG! 1940 - 2020
@@atomicares1752, it was last year I posted the comment
I know
AT-AT V.S. Sandcrawler: A couple of good rams from the Sandcrawler would do the job, But, the AT-AT would stop the Sandcrawler dead in its tracks before it even gets close using its Laser Canons.
I don't believe so, the crawler is a gritty mining rig, but i don't think that the crawler would win with a ram as its command center would probably cave in and both would stop having good times.
The crawler would win. Well it depends in the snow or on tatooine or jakku the crawler would win with just some rams but in foresty areas the at at claps
@@friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351 the sand crawler was never built for combat, so outside of its hull, it has no protective capabilities allowing it to close the distance between it and the at-at, so with the at-at's heavy turbolaser cannons, a well aimed shot to the command center would stop the crawler dead in its tracks, and then it's just a matter of dealing with 4 foot angry jawa's.
@@enclaveenjoyer3410 i mean if it was modded
I like how all the brown pieces are unintentionally slightly different in shade making it look even more realistic!
I think it might be intentional, but yeah it looks incredible and less flat
If I was Lego, I would hire those guys who design this for sure. What a masterpiece. The closer to realism Lego gets the more sells to adults. There are serious collectors there all over the world that could pay 1500-2000$ for it, if it was official release.
your so lucky that you have the money to build this. building this would be a dream come true
You’d be lucky to afford the instructions
You were the guy in the video.
This is actually a moc you can buy from mould king. Which is the exact one he has. This is about $500-$700 depending on when you buy it.
@@brotherhoodofsteelpaladin5890lmao
If I was paying $60 for instructions I would want them printed out and shipped to me. Not as a computer file.
B3VD0G you're paying for their design and time/effort. You're talking thousands of hours.
Simon Paul don't try to justify this bollocks. They aren't try to sell just one copy...
UsernameGeri you know once one is sold, it's super easy for that person to sell copies or give it out for free right?
As someone who has worked on multiple MOCs, I know how time consuming it is and understand the price for instructions. Especially on something so massive.
If you're so bitter about the price, don't buy it. But it's clear you don't appreciate other people's time and effort.
Tracytron 54321 he never said what? I'm sure they'll sell more than one and maybe even a few hundred, maybe.
It's a 12000 piece set. It is complicated. Figuring out the structure that will support all that is extremely difficult and takes multiple attempts at the engineering, etc.
Their prices are quite fair. Keep in mind the price pays the designer and Brickvault.
Hey it takes 1 person to leak it online and there goes there $ if they want that to happen then keep it 60$ if they want people to buy and now get a leaked copy make it 10$
5:55 what hapen if a jawa fell down in the stairs of the cockpit
"Only stormtroopers are so precise"
😲
SKINNE Blaaaahssst points.
How? They shoot everywhere EXCEPT their actual Target
That’s only if the target has plot armor. If they don’t have plot armor, best believe they’re getting folded.
@@atomicares1752 they do that on purpose to let thier targets get away so it frustrates the sith lord
Man I do not want to be rude but $60 is insane for just instructions.
Just for the instructions!
Wow, is Brick Vault allowed to sell instructions and sets that someone else made?
OrangeWither999 i have no idea but $60 is to much
OrangeWither999 yes they get permission
If anyone has the money to build this moc, the 60 bucks are not the problem. A moc this sice will cost alot of money for the parts.
They did have to pay like 1200$ just for the parts to make this move and they need to make a profit somehow
anyone like a guess at how much it cost to build?
It's already been mentioned, 1700$ of Lego and lots of time.
$1700 plus $60 for the plans, its says it in the video lol
Lego needs to make this beast an official Lego set.
Kermit the frog?
Ivo V. Frank Oz
???
Santiago
@@ItsMdogYT the guy who's talking sounds like Kermit
AT-AT would win. In Ep. 5, you can see that they have sniper accuracy at a distance where they are no more visible than black pixels on the horizon
Can you make a size comparison of this MOC to the official LEGO versions of the sand crawler?
funny enough, we don't have the official ones :)
BrickVault oh lol, if you plan on getting the new one in August you should compare it to that.
And so they did
the official ones dont even cost that much for instructions either btw ... $15 for the pdf alone and its 10inches tall
I googled moc sandcrawler, and there is a picture of legos $300 set rolling out of the front of this one. It is that big
This needs to be the next UCS set
Orange coloring at the top has to be rust in the movie. Right?
Ye
I'd say damage from enemy attacks, as it's mainly around the bridge and top deck.
0:50 seconds in and OCD already kicking in on Jawa's torsos not being pushed down all the way. OH MY GAWDDDDDDDDDDD!
Wait a second, where is interior
I was waiting for them to show it too!
Anthony Andrade did you even watch the video?
Kyle Stavrou
I think he means the back half behind the ramp area
Kyle Stavrou- well despite the structure, I think there is a lot of space left in the main hull
Pretty much all the interior detail consisted of was a cockpit and wall area behind the ramp
most of it would be structural
How have I missed this until now?! I must build this!!!
"That worked decently well" he said as the Sandcrawler struggled to climb over a slab
this guy says a lot of things to make you scratch the head
At at vs sandcrawler, no contest, At at wins
YES! The sandcrawler was made for building not brawls!
Insane
I've always thought the sand crawler looked like a capybara.
Oh my god it kind of does
Hey are you going to update the sandcrawler's interior (to match The Mandalorian)?
atat vs sandcrawler.....
if the sandcrwaler could ram the at at before it can fire its heavier weaponry the sandcrwaler might win
but the sandcrwaler is a big clump if rust so a couple of heavy atat rounds would probably blow it apart
Absolute unit.
For an AT-AT vs Sandcrawler battle, it depends entirely on the distance between the two.
If they are far apart, the walker wins easily as the sandcrawler has no ranged weapons.
The only chance for the crawler would be a close quarters fight. At that range, it should be able to ram the AT-AT and knock it over.
Next you should do a UCS AT-TE
Greatest moc of all time. Amazing, it looks fantastic from every view.
Do the tantive IV next!!
They've started on a Tantive IV but they have only finished 2/3 of the hammer at the front
Are you crazy... A CR90 has 150m length, 49m width, 32m height!!! Minifigures are at approximatly 1:38 to 1:42 scale. At 1:40 scale the CR90 would be 3,75m long, 1,225m wide and 0,8m high.
"One good ram would end it all" opens up the terrifying door of little jawas screaming "RAMING SPEED"
Why would you advertise this as "minifig scale"? It is clearly smaller than the minifig scale. Just look at the picture you provided yourself at 5:14 and look at the cockpit all the way up. On the blueprint, you can see that each level of the cockpits could fit at least two dozen Jawas. On the model, at 5:56 there is a room only for four Jawas...Next, take a look at the ramp on the blueprint, again on 5:14 and you can see there is enough space width-wise at the top, most wide part of the ramp that it can hold again at least two dozen Jawas side by side. On the model, at 5:05, the ramp can barely fit 8 Jawas at the same section, width-wise.
The model needs to be bigger at least 2 - 2.5 times than it is now to be called "minifig scale".
No one cares
@@Kreeves33 Well, atm 9 people liked the comment, so at least they and those who understand the importance of correct proportions and scale, care. For the rest of you simpler folks who cannot see past the initial wow-look, i understand why you do not care about correct scale.
@@DemolitionLab Im the 10th liker and I dont care
Fully agreed. False advertising.
the more you look at this, the more you see this is actually just so genius. the clever use of pieces like wagon wheels and crossbows just blew me away.
How many Confederacy MTT sets died to make this masterpiece a reality?
Think you mean Trade Federation
Not a space weapons expert here, but I would think if you shot at the treads and made a good hit or two, the Sandcrawler would be disabled. Then the AT-AT could just take it's time shooting it to pieces. As the Jawa's came running out of a smoldering Crawler, you could just step on them like ants at a picnic. If some Tusken Raiders were some distance away, it would appear to them that the AT-AT was doing some sort of dance. Actually sounds kind of fun!
I almost laughed out loud when it said "instructions available now"
The 2014 sandcrawler is my most desired lego set and this is probably the coolest custom job I've seen
I would really like to build this thing, but i dont think my "pc" is able to work with the programs, and having to buy the parts seperatly sounds like preatty much effort and shipping cost, i would prefer being able to buy a printed version for more money and be able to buy all the parts for the moc, too. That way you know exactly what the moc costs and get it from one shop; and you do not have to buy the instruction and part list before knowing that the moc will not cost ~1700$ but ~2200$ due to shipping cost and part prices. At over 10000 pieces i do not want to be unsure about the endcost of a build.
That's all a tell tale, of you not being a big enough fan, not only of Star Wars, but of the Sandcrawler, Legos and the experience of building something so Star Wars aesthetic of that magnitude, otherwise you would be "chomping on the bit" sort of speak, dreaming at the chance of putting one of these together.
@@gaarcemail in my opinion having to pay 2000€ obly for the parts is ok, but to pay 1000€ for a computer that is able to show the instructions just isnt really what you want, and it has nothing to do with being a fan or not, is it really so hard to make a good product out of a fantastic thing like this? Yes i do not have had any lego for years, but the sandcrawler would be something you could have instead of a boring statue and would be a great puzzle to put together, so stop making big speaches that you are such a big lego fan that would pay 3000€ and that you know everthing about buying cheap parts..., because the average star wars fan just has no idea of how to do this and having to face instructions and programs another language also isnt that easy!
@@brainzmech2971 As you said its just our opinions. But what i wanted to point out is, that you're just paying to look at some instructions on a computer, well i mean, yeah, in your opinion, if you see it that way fine, but what about the hundreds of hours that these guys put into putting that data on a computer? And again if you don't care about compensating people for their hard work, but only what your physically going to get, fine, but some people, such as my self appreciate what they have done, because otherwise, i or others would (if we ever could) have to work hundreds of hours to figure how to do this. I would rather pay $60 and and not have to, that is all. Whether i have the money to do this or not, is besides that point, we are talking about whether it's worth it or not. To be honest, i am not so much a "great" fan of Star Wars, I have always love their art work. I think they where way ahead of their time. I was their on release and was very impressed, again, not by the story, but by the fantastic futuristic art work.
k
@@gaarcemail dude stfu. It's a overpriced con. I love star wars and lego. I have a huge collection and this guy is right. It's over priced for what it is. So is lego to be fair it's only plastic at the end of the day
This build is beautiful. The coloration hints at the Sandcrawler having a previous orange and silver paint scheme that has since deteriorated, rusting the exterior. It's universe-building in the way that it could imply that the Sandcrawlers had a previous function before ultimately being used for of Jawa scavenging operations.
60$ for just instruction......... :'(
They sell plans for ultralights lower than that.
It should be free.
TRIPLE AAA on one Hand that would be nice. On the other im happy that someone actually makes money off his/her creativity
Joshua Mack I guess. Well, I’m gonna go rub poo all over my carpets and sell my house for 10 million dollars.
We're talking about a model that would cost around $1200 if it was premade and sold in stores. Buying the pieces individually will probably cost a good bit more. Anyone who is worried about the $60 instructions probably isn't really interested in paying the $1500 to $2000 needed to get the parts to build it anyways.
AT-AT would win because in the first movie, Storm troopers crippled the Sandcrawler with BLASTERS! Few shots from the AT-AT to the treads, and that thing is a sitting duck!
The sandcrawler would wreck the at at within seconds
Just one good charge and it would be knocked out clean
Teskmestar but all the atat has to do is blast the control center
skillmaster 3566 isn't that thing protected by multiple layers if steel?
And besides even if it was destroyed, the sandcrawler would probably keep rolling, rolling fast
I think you're overestimating the Sandcrawler's mobility. An AT-AT would just blast away at it from range, then sidestep it before it got even close, if it was still running. It was originally made for mining, so it's not armoured and an AT-AT's cannons should have no trouble penetrating it.
shiva369 are the atat's cannons really that powerful?
And the sandcrawler looks pretty damn tough to me
I mean in ANH the Sandcrawler was downed by Imperial Troop blasters. I don't think this transport was built to withstand artillery considering it never really had to be exposed to battlefield vehicles. I'm sure the worst they had to deal with was tusken raider blasters.
just awesome
this should be an official lego model
At-At has heavy turbo lazers so ya the at at would win
The sand crawler is used in tattooine so it’s for sand so that’s an advantage cause the at-at can’t even get in that Terrain
Instruction... INSTRUCTION!!!!
What about the parts!!
I don't have quite enough brown pieces to build something this big, but i am working on a large jabba sail barge
I don't have a real problem with paying $60 for the instructions, my problem is I don't even know how much the parts would cost me to build the thing once I do pay $60 for instructions.
The estimate was 1700$, and some parts in reddish brown are very rare and expensive. But even without those you'll likely spend a ton on multiple shipments from bricklink, which could be very pricey depending on where you live.
But compared to what freaking speculators ask for old retired UCS sets (falcon, tantive iv, star destroyers, death star II, etc.) this Sandcrawler is a steal.
@@generalgrievous5341 u could make a multi color one tho
This has to be the newest Lego ideas sets
U squished a android on the door😅as it closed😒🤖
Without any weapons or defence upgrades the sandcrawler is just so much toast...
Girls: OMG I just bought my first car Im gonna invited my friends and take them to the Mall!
*Boys:*
At-AT because it will use its orbital strike to destroy/disable the Sandcrawler.
Ryan Studios that’s just a battlefront thing, and it’s not even the at at doing the damage. The player simply calls in an orbital strike when using the at at, but it’s not one of the at ats actual weapons
Ryan Studios but the at at would still win
Good point.
This is what I need right now during quarantine
At at would smash through sandcrawlers armour as the sandcrawler is an old mining vehicle, and it could target the sandcrawlers wheels and disable it and then just finish it off
Now the mandalorian can get his shipparts back in minifigscale 🤗😝
I’m still waiting for the minifig tantiv iv
I enjoyed watching it being built in the live streams - nice to see the finished article, and see it move as well. Thank you.
the sand crawler reminds me of halo four canpain mammoth
3:05 actually the AT-AT is faster at 37 mph, the sand crawler can only go 19 mph, soo the AT-AT is faster, and it has actual weaponry, soo it can destroy the sandcrawler very easily, plus an ram would do nothing cuz the upside down slop, but would knock over the at at if it hit the side, but at front the cockpit would get destroyed.
At at win It could shoot the tracks
ooof didnt think of that
Ah, but the SAND will be unstable, making the AT-AT lose its footing and aim!
The sand would fly into its joints and engine, stopping up the legs and causing the engine to overheat. Soon, the engine would catch fire, causing the fuel tank to explode, destroying it.
Insulting my Star Wars knowledge was completely unnecessary.
the tracks wouldent break the crawler can run over at at
The AT-AT would smite the Jawas before they even got close
Way to stretch it out to that 10 minute mark👍🏻😂
Lol what? I don’t have as blocked and it’s funny bc it’s exactly 10mins😂
This is so cool! It’s so detailed! Wow! Could you guys make a playlist of all of your minifigure scale custom builds and stuff? I would love to see all of them in one place!
So much reddish brown... How many of them broke when building this?
a lot
Daniel Werner why would they break is reddish brown made of weaker plastic?
Yes, the pigment some colors are made of (reddish brown, but also burgundy and some lime green I think) makes the mold more fragile. Reddish brown is the worst case of it.
Great Set!
Not to be critical but you don't review products that you sell you show off there good points (still a great build)
Ahren Lohrbaecher their
Thenks fure thiy corectshun
About the AT-AT debate: the sandcrawler was made to survive the harsh deserts of Tatooine, not for military purpose. At the very least, the AT-AT should be able to take out at least 1 set of treads, which would most likely cause the sandcrawler to become immobile (an absence of treads would mean that sand particles may be able to be trapped in the gear mechanisms, which would be a death sentence for the crawlers if their engine(s) are inter joined and connected to all wheels)
Basically, the AT-AT is military and can shoot the treads, while the sandcrawler is a big metal target
Can you make it bigger? And a cheaper one with no power functions? And lessen the price of instructions
Next time someone is going to build a scale model of the sun out of lego in space
$60 is ridiculous for instructions. The star destroyer is only $25. PASS.
Mark people like you are really just ignorant, pretty sad tbh
Alternate title: Kermit the frog reviews the ultimate sand crawler
Yes hello LEGO I need 74 lbs of B R O W N
The moc is stupendous. Great job everyone
76 Tuskens disliked this
Imagine just owning a legal fuctional life size sand crawler
Brilliant but not much interior :(
That's pretty awesome. Not gonna lie.
Vote here.
Like = Sandcrawler
Comment = AT-AT
I think one good shot from the at-at's heavy cannons to the treads of the sand crawler would cripple the sandcrawler
$60,- for a pdf with a lego instruction... comedy
dXb you realize how many potential hundreds of man hours went into the creation of both this model, and the process of refining the build into something that could be easily laid out via instructions, right? Given the amount of effort and time that was likely sunk into this build, 60 dollars for the instructions is more than reasonable for an undertaking of this scale.
@@lightningmcqueengaming7547 60 is not reasonable for instructions no matter how many hours you put it the instructions for something like this should be 30 max
@@whattheyourgae9627 that moment when you're wrong
@@lightningmcqueengaming7547 I'm never wrong
@@lightningmcqueengaming7547 plus it's a PDF not proper I stuction books
The ultimate ultimate collector series sandcrawler
Did you accept lungs to buy the set?
Seriously beautiful
Why are instructions so much money?
Rebei 3 they're greedy.
nah i think it's because... eh, you have a point.
Because it takes much work to detail the step-by-step instruction of 12000 pieces.
If you don't have the money for the instructions then you don't have the money for the parts.
blackoutnowx I do I just feel that it's a little pricy
think about the 100s of hours that the designer put into the model, the price for the instructions is only a small portion of what the thing is really worth