Ultimate LEGO Sandcrawler!!! 12,000+ Parts! Full Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @cxleb9882
    @cxleb9882 5 ปีที่แล้ว +359

    5:10 that poor droid gets his eye banged on the door

  • @chronotrigger8429
    @chronotrigger8429 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1616

    Total costs: Over 1700$ to build that thing
    Why not.

    • @dipdungus8175
      @dipdungus8175 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Kaden Stanton legend

    • @achannelhasnoname5182
      @achannelhasnoname5182 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Wow I expected it to be even more!

    • @KING_mrman
      @KING_mrman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      My whole rent for a lego set. Neat

    • @jackroberts9546
      @jackroberts9546 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kaden Stanton respect for you

    • @Onuiwa
      @Onuiwa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Kaden Stanton Wow! I know this sounds silly but that's actually not that bad in my opinion. If I had more money I'd probably buy the pieces and build it.

  • @Kalidor99
    @Kalidor99 6 ปีที่แล้ว +357

    I want the death star in minifig scale
    150Km / 1.80m * 4.0cm = 3.333Km diameter.

    • @Infinit0s
      @Infinit0s 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      I think you may struggle to get the parts even if you collect all lego from around the world ;)

    • @berndarndt9924
      @berndarndt9924 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Infinit0s you can make them yourself. Its not that hard, its just expensive but when you have enough money, space and time to build a minifig scale death star, that shouldn´t be the problem.

    • @zombie-v9i
      @zombie-v9i 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That would be very expensive but also very cool

    • @scorpiovenator_4736
      @scorpiovenator_4736 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That will take them a while

    • @user-wc7fh3iy5h
      @user-wc7fh3iy5h 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@berndarndt9924 why not make minifigures smaller

  • @soundwave9414
    @soundwave9414 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2512

    For the price of a used car, you can buy a minifig scale sand crawler

    • @ismaels3471
      @ismaels3471 5 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      Buy Fake lego

    • @goldenxper8167
      @goldenxper8167 5 ปีที่แล้ว +170

      @@ismaels3471 it would fall apart fake is really bad

    • @LD-qf7bf
      @LD-qf7bf 5 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      This honestly isn’t even close to mini fig scale. It’s very downsized

    • @thedeviousduck8027
      @thedeviousduck8027 5 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      @@ismaels3471 Fake lego doesn't stick together very well. It's why lego isn't cheap, they test each piece to make sure it fits well with other pieces.

    • @edly32
      @edly32 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Soundwave superior

  • @kennyotsu4357
    @kennyotsu4357 5 ปีที่แล้ว +538

    *If two more guys decide to build this thing, Lego will run out of brown bricks*

    • @CrisisComics
      @CrisisComics 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Why do I have the feeling we're gonna see someone build a multicolored monstrosity out of these instructions?

    • @zero-ew8bf
      @zero-ew8bf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      2 words: 3d printer

    • @swety2962
      @swety2962 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@zero-ew8bf wouldn't really work

    • @evedoingthingsaaaaa
      @evedoingthingsaaaaa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@swety2962 only economically. You can print bricks.

    • @evedoingthingsaaaaa
      @evedoingthingsaaaaa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wait a minute, that can't be right. I know your probably joking, but there was a geonosian starfighter that was probably roughly 300 parts. There were probably at least 10,000 of those sets made, and seeing as they were almost entirely brown, there would be 3,000,000 brown bricks at least.

  • @carumsarene
    @carumsarene 6 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    In my opinion the biggest flaw is it being an RC model. It would've worked out much better with an accurate approach to the model on form rather than function, with a fully fleshed out and detailed interior.

    • @firstorderflametrooper9730
      @firstorderflametrooper9730 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes but how do you move it because it literally ways more than a German Shepherd

    • @LegoAviation
      @LegoAviation ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @serpintinelion8926
      @serpintinelion8926 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same. You could flesh out some interior areas with removable side panels.

    • @bigeez9432
      @bigeez9432 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't agree it would be to many pieces and probably no would buy it.

  • @Justyburger
    @Justyburger 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    Awesome build. The reason that rust and wear are more common at the top, is because it is harder to access, being higher up.

    • @ZakuInATopHat
      @ZakuInATopHat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I bet it being taller than most dunes around it doesn’t help with wind wear either

    • @soverien41
      @soverien41 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Here I was thinking that they just ran into a cliff face and got a little Tatooine natural landscape rub.

  • @ThornEternal
    @ThornEternal 5 ปีที่แล้ว +357

    What the 2005 sand crawler felt like when I was 7 years old.😂

  • @SwordlordRoy
    @SwordlordRoy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +232

    "Someone with too much time on their hands would even attempt to build this."
    What about someone who just really loves Jawas?

  • @Night4fingers
    @Night4fingers 6 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    For your "AT-AT vs Sandcrawler" debate : AT-AT. That's a military walker with surprising speed (60km/h top speed) against a slow mining crawler (30km/h top speed) (Source : Wookieepedia).
    As for armament, the Sandcrawler has nothing except the jawas inside. The AT-AT has twin laser cannons.
    Of course, give the Jawas about ten minutes unopposed, and they'll have the AT-AT disabled and its guts thrown across the desert. Good thing there are stormtroopers aboard to prevent that.

    • @merafirewing6591
      @merafirewing6591 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just run the AT-AT over.

    • @MattGaming4567.
      @MattGaming4567. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@merafirewing6591 how's it going to do that when it's getting fucked by heavy cannon fire

    • @proxy1359
      @proxy1359 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jawas... Have shotguns.

    • @proxy1359
      @proxy1359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wait, imagine a modified war sandcrawler, basically a normal sandcrawler but with higher speed, more reliability, shields, and a bunch of guns.

    • @Harpoon2theRescue
      @Harpoon2theRescue 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@proxy1359 Have the good folks at The Citadel in Mad Max take a look at both vehicles and you'll get a 48mph galloping AT-AT with 36 assault cannons and a blown Sandcrawler that does the quarter mile in just under 9 seconds.

  • @theodorexenophon7612
    @theodorexenophon7612 5 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    I mean the AT-AT has weapons so it’ll probably blow up the sandcrawler before it could ram it. Sandcrawlers seem pretty slow, so ramming might not be the best strat anyway.

    • @pills-
      @pills- 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      "Release... the JAWAS!"
      :D

    • @cogtheprotogen6671
      @cogtheprotogen6671 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sand crawlers are not slow in universe. Its definitely faster than a at-at. But an at-at does have empire grade weapons while the Sand crawler is essentially a trade vessel armed with nothing more than crew with blasters. Speaking of crew the Sand crawler has ALOT more. Basically it would come down to distance & environment. If their far away from eachother easy win for at-at as they excell at slow Aproaches, If their close to each other the Sand crawler would most likely win. And for environment mountains could provide cover and despite it being in the name at-ats are not all terrain, so there are many types of terrain that would either hinder or prevent it moving. In most situations with a environment not native to either the Sand crawler wins due to treads being better than legs. But! you don't care about all that, *TLDR:* You place the two vehicles at a fair distance in an open flat battlefield, Sand crawler wins more often. It will tank the first volley from the at-at, close the distance, & ram the at-at. the at-at might hit a critical system first volley, or not fall over from the ram, But I'd say like 87% of the time Sand crawler wins.

  • @StandingUpForBetter
    @StandingUpForBetter 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Hands down one of the best Star Wars Lego creations I have ever seen. Made props to the designers and the builders. Again, WOW!

  • @eninjajedi2677
    @eninjajedi2677 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    5:33 The first thing I thought of when I saw the cockpit was The Mandalorian hitting his head on the ceiling when he was in the Sandcrawler in Chapter 2 lol

  • @silverserpent100
    @silverserpent100 6 ปีที่แล้ว +673

    I mean if you can’t afford 60 dollars for the instructions you’re definitely not going to be able to afford the parts

    • @DD8081
      @DD8081 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I mean I'd like to see the layout and complexity of the instructions before spending 2000 dollars on pieces from BrickLink.

  • @NullSimn
    @NullSimn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    I fear no man but that thing it scares me
    The thing: dropping this masterpiece

    • @zero-ew8bf
      @zero-ew8bf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The thing: losing ur 8 month old child in it

    • @galadato7425
      @galadato7425 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've seen this power only once before, it didn't scared me than.

  • @atomicares1752
    @atomicares1752 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    AT-AT V.S. Sandcrawler: A couple of good rams from the Sandcrawler would do the job, But, the AT-AT would stop the Sandcrawler dead in its tracks before it even gets close using its Laser Canons.

    • @joelharper5727
      @joelharper5727 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't believe so, the crawler is a gritty mining rig, but i don't think that the crawler would win with a ram as its command center would probably cave in and both would stop having good times.

    • @friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351
      @friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The crawler would win. Well it depends in the snow or on tatooine or jakku the crawler would win with just some rams but in foresty areas the at at claps

    • @enclaveenjoyer3410
      @enclaveenjoyer3410 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351 the sand crawler was never built for combat, so outside of its hull, it has no protective capabilities allowing it to close the distance between it and the at-at, so with the at-at's heavy turbolaser cannons, a well aimed shot to the command center would stop the crawler dead in its tracks, and then it's just a matter of dealing with 4 foot angry jawa's.

    • @friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351
      @friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@enclaveenjoyer3410 i mean if it was modded

  • @goo_90
    @goo_90 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Isn’t it so amazing that so much achievement have been created just from this simple toy? It’s evolved since 1940-2019!!!

    • @atomicares1752
      @atomicares1752 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      WRONG! 1940 - 2020

    • @goo_90
      @goo_90 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@atomicares1752, it was last year I posted the comment

    • @atomicares1752
      @atomicares1752 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know

  • @thecrazeecow1682
    @thecrazeecow1682 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I like how all the brown pieces are unintentionally slightly different in shade making it look even more realistic!

    • @prakesh2904
      @prakesh2904 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think it might be intentional, but yeah it looks incredible and less flat

  • @kemritthefrog9567
    @kemritthefrog9567 6 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    your so lucky that you have the money to build this. building this would be a dream come true

    • @brotherhoodofsteelpaladin5890
      @brotherhoodofsteelpaladin5890 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You’d be lucky to afford the instructions

    • @TheBrickBuildingEnthusiast
      @TheBrickBuildingEnthusiast 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You were the guy in the video.

    • @denniscornsmack9416
      @denniscornsmack9416 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is actually a moc you can buy from mould king. Which is the exact one he has. This is about $500-$700 depending on when you buy it.

    • @Forwuut
      @Forwuut ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brotherhoodofsteelpaladin5890lmao

  • @enlathxaind178
    @enlathxaind178 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If I was Lego, I would hire those guys who design this for sure. What a masterpiece. The closer to realism Lego gets the more sells to adults. There are serious collectors there all over the world that could pay 1500-2000$ for it, if it was official release.

  • @ivov.8165
    @ivov.8165 6 ปีที่แล้ว +226

    Kermit the frog?

    • @ittoakimbo
      @ittoakimbo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ivo V. Frank Oz

    • @ItsMdogYT
      @ItsMdogYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ???

    • @eliotlong5184
      @eliotlong5184 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Santiago

    • @Oliver-gd7uf
      @Oliver-gd7uf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ItsMdogYT the guy who's talking sounds like Kermit

  • @danielunderwood5217
    @danielunderwood5217 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    AT-AT would win. In Ep. 5, you can see that they have sniper accuracy at a distance where they are no more visible than black pixels on the horizon

  • @skinne4280
    @skinne4280 5 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    "Only stormtroopers are so precise"
    😲

    • @Ghostrider-71
      @Ghostrider-71 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      SKINNE Blaaaahssst points.

    • @atomicares1752
      @atomicares1752 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How? They shoot everywhere EXCEPT their actual Target

    • @SonGoku-oz5qs
      @SonGoku-oz5qs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s only if the target has plot armor. If they don’t have plot armor, best believe they’re getting folded.

    • @rajveersonia6345
      @rajveersonia6345 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@atomicares1752 they do that on purpose to let thier targets get away so it frustrates the sith lord

  • @touchgameplay
    @touchgameplay 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    anyone like a guess at how much it cost to build?

    • @olivertaylor4779
      @olivertaylor4779 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's already been mentioned, 1700$ of Lego and lots of time.

    • @wolfe1970
      @wolfe1970 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      $1700 plus $60 for the plans, its says it in the video lol

  • @mainlineproductions9419
    @mainlineproductions9419 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    5:55 what hapen if a jawa fell down in the stairs of the cockpit

  • @BlackringIII
    @BlackringIII 6 ปีที่แล้ว +307

    Wait a second, where is interior

    • @Danilego
      @Danilego 6 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      I was waiting for them to show it too!

    • @kylestavrou4009
      @kylestavrou4009 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Anthony Andrade did you even watch the video?

    • @ratbat1072
      @ratbat1072 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Kyle Stavrou
      I think he means the back half behind the ramp area

    • @BlackringIII
      @BlackringIII 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Kyle Stavrou- well despite the structure, I think there is a lot of space left in the main hull
      Pretty much all the interior detail consisted of was a cockpit and wall area behind the ramp

    • @canadianbluepants9446
      @canadianbluepants9446 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      most of it would be structural

  • @FizzWizardHD
    @FizzWizardHD 6 ปีที่แล้ว +905

    If I was paying $60 for instructions I would want them printed out and shipped to me. Not as a computer file.

    • @spaulagain
      @spaulagain 6 ปีที่แล้ว +218

      B3VD0G you're paying for their design and time/effort. You're talking thousands of hours.

    • @UsernameGeri
      @UsernameGeri 6 ปีที่แล้ว +97

      Simon Paul don't try to justify this bollocks. They aren't try to sell just one copy...

    • @spaulagain
      @spaulagain 6 ปีที่แล้ว +120

      UsernameGeri you know once one is sold, it's super easy for that person to sell copies or give it out for free right?
      As someone who has worked on multiple MOCs, I know how time consuming it is and understand the price for instructions. Especially on something so massive.
      If you're so bitter about the price, don't buy it. But it's clear you don't appreciate other people's time and effort.

    • @spaulagain
      @spaulagain 6 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Tracytron 54321 he never said what? I'm sure they'll sell more than one and maybe even a few hundred, maybe.
      It's a 12000 piece set. It is complicated. Figuring out the structure that will support all that is extremely difficult and takes multiple attempts at the engineering, etc.
      Their prices are quite fair. Keep in mind the price pays the designer and Brickvault.

    • @Pie4life123
      @Pie4life123 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Hey it takes 1 person to leak it online and there goes there $ if they want that to happen then keep it 60$ if they want people to buy and now get a leaked copy make it 10$

  • @brettnapier5541
    @brettnapier5541 6 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Can you make a size comparison of this MOC to the official LEGO versions of the sand crawler?

    • @BrickVault
      @BrickVault  6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      funny enough, we don't have the official ones :)

    • @brettnapier5541
      @brettnapier5541 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      BrickVault oh lol, if you plan on getting the new one in August you should compare it to that.

    • @maksolejarz
      @maksolejarz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      And so they did

    • @0623kaboom
      @0623kaboom 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      the official ones dont even cost that much for instructions either btw ... $15 for the pdf alone and its 10inches tall

    • @danielunderwood5217
      @danielunderwood5217 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I googled moc sandcrawler, and there is a picture of legos $300 set rolling out of the front of this one. It is that big

  • @roboninja3194
    @roboninja3194 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Orange coloring at the top has to be rust in the movie. Right?

    • @pouletbidule9831
      @pouletbidule9831 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ye

    • @dermsUK
      @dermsUK 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd say damage from enemy attacks, as it's mainly around the bridge and top deck.

  • @merafirewing6591
    @merafirewing6591 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lego needs to make this beast an official Lego set.

  • @Icelandic_Sand
    @Icelandic_Sand 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    At at vs sandcrawler, no contest, At at wins

    • @howardnudd9322
      @howardnudd9322 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      YES! The sandcrawler was made for building not brawls!

  • @MeatyMaidy
    @MeatyMaidy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This needs to be the next UCS set

  • @AsapAnimation
    @AsapAnimation 6 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Insane

  • @callumpears1523
    @callumpears1523 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For an AT-AT vs Sandcrawler battle, it depends entirely on the distance between the two.
    If they are far apart, the walker wins easily as the sandcrawler has no ranged weapons.
    The only chance for the crawler would be a close quarters fight. At that range, it should be able to ram the AT-AT and knock it over.

  • @paistinlasta1805
    @paistinlasta1805 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "That worked decently well" he said as the Sandcrawler struggled to climb over a slab

    • @mattmilauskas5727
      @mattmilauskas5727 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      this guy says a lot of things to make you scratch the head

  • @Phickic
    @Phickic ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've always thought the sand crawler looked like a capybara.

  • @willybold1963
    @willybold1963 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey are you going to update the sandcrawler's interior (to match The Mandalorian)?

  • @MinuteExplained
    @MinuteExplained 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This build is beautiful. The coloration hints at the Sandcrawler having a previous orange and silver paint scheme that has since deteriorated, rusting the exterior. It's universe-building in the way that it could imply that the Sandcrawlers had a previous function before ultimately being used for of Jawa scavenging operations.

  • @hughboggan8040
    @hughboggan8040 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    At at would smash through sandcrawlers armour as the sandcrawler is an old mining vehicle, and it could target the sandcrawlers wheels and disable it and then just finish it off

  • @max_power8510
    @max_power8510 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:50 seconds in and OCD already kicking in on Jawa's torsos not being pushed down all the way. OH MY GAWDDDDDDDDDDD!

  • @bluephone620
    @bluephone620 6 ปีที่แล้ว +858

    Man I do not want to be rude but $60 is insane for just instructions.

    • @CuppaTeaExe
      @CuppaTeaExe 6 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      Just for the instructions!
      Wow, is Brick Vault allowed to sell instructions and sets that someone else made?

    • @bluephone620
      @bluephone620 6 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      OrangeWither999 i have no idea but $60 is to much

    • @someonels3
      @someonels3 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      OrangeWither999 yes they get permission

    • @wesleysnider2915
      @wesleysnider2915 6 ปีที่แล้ว +132

      If anyone has the money to build this moc, the 60 bucks are not the problem. A moc this sice will cost alot of money for the parts.

    • @Simon-un5pv
      @Simon-un5pv 6 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      They did have to pay like 1200$ just for the parts to make this move and they need to make a profit somehow

  • @JULEBOL
    @JULEBOL 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    atat vs sandcrawler.....
    if the sandcrwaler could ram the at at before it can fire its heavier weaponry the sandcrwaler might win
    but the sandcrwaler is a big clump if rust so a couple of heavy atat rounds would probably blow it apart

  • @agrippa.the.cosmonaut-wiz
    @agrippa.the.cosmonaut-wiz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Absolute unit.

  • @angryaardvark5011
    @angryaardvark5011 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How have I missed this until now?! I must build this!!!

  • @CharloTangi
    @CharloTangi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    The sandcrawler would wreck the at at within seconds
    Just one good charge and it would be knocked out clean

    • @largespaget
      @largespaget 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Teskmestar but all the atat has to do is blast the control center

    • @CharloTangi
      @CharloTangi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      skillmaster 3566 isn't that thing protected by multiple layers if steel?
      And besides even if it was destroyed, the sandcrawler would probably keep rolling, rolling fast

    • @shiva369
      @shiva369 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I think you're overestimating the Sandcrawler's mobility. An AT-AT would just blast away at it from range, then sidestep it before it got even close, if it was still running. It was originally made for mining, so it's not armoured and an AT-AT's cannons should have no trouble penetrating it.

    • @CharloTangi
      @CharloTangi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      shiva369 are the atat's cannons really that powerful?
      And the sandcrawler looks pretty damn tough to me

    • @BelieveInFiction10
      @BelieveInFiction10 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I mean in ANH the Sandcrawler was downed by Imperial Troop blasters. I don't think this transport was built to withstand artillery considering it never really had to be exposed to battlefield vehicles. I'm sure the worst they had to deal with was tusken raider blasters.

  • @Foxygrandpa1912
    @Foxygrandpa1912 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the more you look at this, the more you see this is actually just so genius. the clever use of pieces like wagon wheels and crossbows just blew me away.

  • @largespaget
    @largespaget 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Next you should do a UCS AT-TE

  • @HORRIOR1
    @HORRIOR1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    AT-AT would win because in the first movie, Storm troopers crippled the Sandcrawler with BLASTERS! Few shots from the AT-AT to the treads, and that thing is a sitting duck!

  • @hoo-lp7xp
    @hoo-lp7xp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Do the tantive IV next!!

    • @Zeoproo
      @Zeoproo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They've started on a Tantive IV but they have only finished 2/3 of the hammer at the front

    • @danielwlodawer1282
      @danielwlodawer1282 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you crazy... A CR90 has 150m length, 49m width, 32m height!!! Minifigures are at approximatly 1:38 to 1:42 scale. At 1:40 scale the CR90 would be 3,75m long, 1,225m wide and 0,8m high.

  • @NarrowFTW
    @NarrowFTW 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Greatest moc of all time. Amazing, it looks fantastic from every view.

  • @brainzmech2971
    @brainzmech2971 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I would really like to build this thing, but i dont think my "pc" is able to work with the programs, and having to buy the parts seperatly sounds like preatty much effort and shipping cost, i would prefer being able to buy a printed version for more money and be able to buy all the parts for the moc, too. That way you know exactly what the moc costs and get it from one shop; and you do not have to buy the instruction and part list before knowing that the moc will not cost ~1700$ but ~2200$ due to shipping cost and part prices. At over 10000 pieces i do not want to be unsure about the endcost of a build.

    • @gaarcemail
      @gaarcemail 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's all a tell tale, of you not being a big enough fan, not only of Star Wars, but of the Sandcrawler, Legos and the experience of building something so Star Wars aesthetic of that magnitude, otherwise you would be "chomping on the bit" sort of speak, dreaming at the chance of putting one of these together.

    • @brainzmech2971
      @brainzmech2971 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@gaarcemail in my opinion having to pay 2000€ obly for the parts is ok, but to pay 1000€ for a computer that is able to show the instructions just isnt really what you want, and it has nothing to do with being a fan or not, is it really so hard to make a good product out of a fantastic thing like this? Yes i do not have had any lego for years, but the sandcrawler would be something you could have instead of a boring statue and would be a great puzzle to put together, so stop making big speaches that you are such a big lego fan that would pay 3000€ and that you know everthing about buying cheap parts..., because the average star wars fan just has no idea of how to do this and having to face instructions and programs another language also isnt that easy!

    • @gaarcemail
      @gaarcemail 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brainzmech2971 As you said its just our opinions. But what i wanted to point out is, that you're just paying to look at some instructions on a computer, well i mean, yeah, in your opinion, if you see it that way fine, but what about the hundreds of hours that these guys put into putting that data on a computer? And again if you don't care about compensating people for their hard work, but only what your physically going to get, fine, but some people, such as my self appreciate what they have done, because otherwise, i or others would (if we ever could) have to work hundreds of hours to figure how to do this. I would rather pay $60 and and not have to, that is all. Whether i have the money to do this or not, is besides that point, we are talking about whether it's worth it or not. To be honest, i am not so much a "great" fan of Star Wars, I have always love their art work. I think they where way ahead of their time. I was their on release and was very impressed, again, not by the story, but by the fantastic futuristic art work.

    • @Conquered
      @Conquered 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      k

    • @budman8926
      @budman8926 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gaarcemail dude stfu. It's a overpriced con. I love star wars and lego. I have a huge collection and this guy is right. It's over priced for what it is. So is lego to be fair it's only plastic at the end of the day

  • @superfluous9726
    @superfluous9726 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "One good ram would end it all" opens up the terrifying door of little jawas screaming "RAMING SPEED"

  • @jja1483
    @jja1483 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    U squished a android on the door😅as it closed😒🤖

  • @TheGryxter
    @TheGryxter 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not a space weapons expert here, but I would think if you shot at the treads and made a good hit or two, the Sandcrawler would be disabled. Then the AT-AT could just take it's time shooting it to pieces. As the Jawa's came running out of a smoldering Crawler, you could just step on them like ants at a picnic. If some Tusken Raiders were some distance away, it would appear to them that the AT-AT was doing some sort of dance. Actually sounds kind of fun!

  • @RyanStudios50166
    @RyanStudios50166 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    At-AT because it will use its orbital strike to destroy/disable the Sandcrawler.

    • @ajterry5626
      @ajterry5626 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ryan Studios that’s just a battlefront thing, and it’s not even the at at doing the damage. The player simply calls in an orbital strike when using the at at, but it’s not one of the at ats actual weapons

    • @ajterry5626
      @ajterry5626 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ryan Studios but the at at would still win

    • @RyanStudios50166
      @RyanStudios50166 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good point.

  • @rockett6578
    @rockett6578 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The sand crawler is used in tattooine so it’s for sand so that’s an advantage cause the at-at can’t even get in that Terrain

  • @enthargaming9700
    @enthargaming9700 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    At-At has heavy turbo lazers so ya the at at would win

  • @Vikn01
    @Vikn01 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 2014 sandcrawler is my most desired lego set and this is probably the coolest custom job I've seen

  • @avpfreak
    @avpfreak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How many Confederacy MTT sets died to make this masterpiece a reality?

    • @cesarlopez9995
      @cesarlopez9995 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Think you mean Trade Federation

  • @Z4NE-v4o
    @Z4NE-v4o 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But we buy the set to build and the instructions or we buy that and just came with the instructions?

  • @otaylonee8377
    @otaylonee8377 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Instruction... INSTRUCTION!!!!
    What about the parts!!

  • @silentpuppy5456
    @silentpuppy5456 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Alternate title: Kermit the frog reviews the ultimate sand crawler

  • @kade4503
    @kade4503 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I almost laughed out loud when it said "instructions available now"

  • @friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351
    @friendlyneighbourhoodarsen7351 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imagine just owning a legal fuctional life size sand crawler

  • @williamoldaker5348
    @williamoldaker5348 6 ปีที่แล้ว +554

    60$ for just instruction......... :'(

    • @chrishansen456
      @chrishansen456 6 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      They sell plans for ultralights lower than that.

    • @tripleaaa4409
      @tripleaaa4409 6 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      It should be free.

    • @gur262
      @gur262 6 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      TRIPLE AAA on one Hand that would be nice. On the other im happy that someone actually makes money off his/her creativity

    • @tripleaaa4409
      @tripleaaa4409 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Joshua Mack I guess. Well, I’m gonna go rub poo all over my carpets and sell my house for 10 million dollars.

    • @thatotherkyle
      @thatotherkyle 6 ปีที่แล้ว +99

      We're talking about a model that would cost around $1200 if it was premade and sold in stores. Buying the pieces individually will probably cost a good bit more. Anyone who is worried about the $60 instructions probably isn't really interested in paying the $1500 to $2000 needed to get the parts to build it anyways.

  • @TheGodshelper
    @TheGodshelper 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Without any weapons or defence upgrades the sandcrawler is just so much toast...

  • @jessemaas9533
    @jessemaas9533 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the sand crawler reminds me of halo four canpain mammoth

  • @chaddles623
    @chaddles623 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is absolutely sick looking, but the tracks on it look kinda loose, can ya tighten them up any? And it could probably roll better.

  • @spectrumstudios4848
    @spectrumstudios4848 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can you make it bigger? And a cheaper one with no power functions? And lessen the price of instructions

  • @BoozyBeggar
    @BoozyBeggar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm personally not a big fan of motors and electronics in sets, tho occasionally I think LEDs can work for me. Just a couple questions, and anyone with the set feel free to help me out:
    1) Suppose I didn't want all the wires and the motors taking up space, will the front door section still be able to pivot down properly and also stay closed when up?
    2) The sections with the wires you showed a couple times, is that interior meant to be, like, an accessible area the jawas can normally get into?

    • @dddboom
      @dddboom 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      1) No the motors spin the two pistons that unwind and open the "mouth" it's not really possible to use that function without the motor. You may be able to think of another method using ball+sockets or something but there a lot of weight to the front door.
      2) I can't actually open the section he opened to access the motor as it's EXTREMELY hard to get back on. Hard to explain but once I finally got those pieces on inwas never taking them off, I access the motor from the very top centre, there a big piece in the middle that lifts away so you can get right inside the whole thing. Note most of it is hollow, in the interior only goes back about 1/4 of the way.
      Other than that I'd say the motor/wires don't take up much room at all and it's a great fiction to open the door and drive it around (mine actually goes a lot faster than theirs)

  • @danielwerner86
    @danielwerner86 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    So much reddish brown... How many of them broke when building this?

    • @BrickVault
      @BrickVault  6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      a lot

    • @nathan.w9906
      @nathan.w9906 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Daniel Werner why would they break is reddish brown made of weaker plastic?

    • @danielwerner86
      @danielwerner86 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes, the pigment some colors are made of (reddish brown, but also burgundy and some lime green I think) makes the mold more fragile. Reddish brown is the worst case of it.

  • @ItsMdogYT
    @ItsMdogYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The AT-AT would smite the Jawas before they even got close

  • @aidensvlogsandairsoft8894
    @aidensvlogsandairsoft8894 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I’m still waiting for the minifig tantiv iv

  • @agon-eery
    @agon-eery 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    About the AT-AT debate: the sandcrawler was made to survive the harsh deserts of Tatooine, not for military purpose. At the very least, the AT-AT should be able to take out at least 1 set of treads, which would most likely cause the sandcrawler to become immobile (an absence of treads would mean that sand particles may be able to be trapped in the gear mechanisms, which would be a death sentence for the crawlers if their engine(s) are inter joined and connected to all wheels)
    Basically, the AT-AT is military and can shoot the treads, while the sandcrawler is a big metal target

  • @aydenstockham1143
    @aydenstockham1143 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    At at win It could shoot the tracks

    • @BrickVault
      @BrickVault  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ooof didnt think of that

    • @CT--my4lf
      @CT--my4lf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ah, but the SAND will be unstable, making the AT-AT lose its footing and aim!

    • @CT--my4lf
      @CT--my4lf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The sand would fly into its joints and engine, stopping up the legs and causing the engine to overheat. Soon, the engine would catch fire, causing the fuel tank to explode, destroying it.

    • @CT--my4lf
      @CT--my4lf 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Insulting my Star Wars knowledge was completely unnecessary.

    • @tchubb9230
      @tchubb9230 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      the tracks wouldent break the crawler can run over at at

  • @Wi-Fi-El
    @Wi-Fi-El 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't have quite enough brown pieces to build something this big, but i am working on a large jabba sail barge

  • @DemolitionLab
    @DemolitionLab 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Why would you advertise this as "minifig scale"? It is clearly smaller than the minifig scale. Just look at the picture you provided yourself at 5:14 and look at the cockpit all the way up. On the blueprint, you can see that each level of the cockpits could fit at least two dozen Jawas. On the model, at 5:56 there is a room only for four Jawas...Next, take a look at the ramp on the blueprint, again on 5:14 and you can see there is enough space width-wise at the top, most wide part of the ramp that it can hold again at least two dozen Jawas side by side. On the model, at 5:05, the ramp can barely fit 8 Jawas at the same section, width-wise.
    The model needs to be bigger at least 2 - 2.5 times than it is now to be called "minifig scale".

    • @Kreeves33
      @Kreeves33 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No one cares

    • @DemolitionLab
      @DemolitionLab 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Kreeves33 Well, atm 9 people liked the comment, so at least they and those who understand the importance of correct proportions and scale, care. For the rest of you simpler folks who cannot see past the initial wow-look, i understand why you do not care about correct scale.

    • @XOTheEmreOX
      @XOTheEmreOX 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DemolitionLab Im the 10th liker and I dont care

    • @eXplozijauma
      @eXplozijauma 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fully agreed. False advertising.

  • @marcobro8503
    @marcobro8503 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now the mandalorian can get his shipparts back in minifigscale 🤗😝

  • @r.nlawbreaker1601
    @r.nlawbreaker1601 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Not to be critical but you don't review products that you sell you show off there good points (still a great build)

    • @kaien800
      @kaien800 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ahren Lohrbaecher their

    • @r.nlawbreaker1601
      @r.nlawbreaker1601 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thenks fure thiy corectshun

  • @ErikS-
    @ErikS- 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    just awesome
    this should be an official lego model

  • @Mark-OutWest
    @Mark-OutWest 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    $60 is ridiculous for instructions. The star destroyer is only $25. PASS.

    • @kq1534
      @kq1534 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark people like you are really just ignorant, pretty sad tbh

  • @CDFman
    @CDFman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is what I need right now during quarantine

  • @acts221
    @acts221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Vote here.
    Like = Sandcrawler
    Comment = AT-AT

  • @MaidTailgate
    @MaidTailgate 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So,who bought the instructions?If you did,how much did it cost to get all the pieces?

  • @Conquered
    @Conquered 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I don't have a real problem with paying $60 for the instructions, my problem is I don't even know how much the parts would cost me to build the thing once I do pay $60 for instructions.

    • @generalgrievous5341
      @generalgrievous5341 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The estimate was 1700$, and some parts in reddish brown are very rare and expensive. But even without those you'll likely spend a ton on multiple shipments from bricklink, which could be very pricey depending on where you live.
      But compared to what freaking speculators ask for old retired UCS sets (falcon, tantive iv, star destroyers, death star II, etc.) this Sandcrawler is a steal.

    • @kellycortez3278
      @kellycortez3278 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@generalgrievous5341 u could make a multi color one tho

  • @carriageofnoreturn.1881
    @carriageofnoreturn.1881 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I enjoyed watching it being built in the live streams - nice to see the finished article, and see it move as well. Thank you.

  • @sethallison5682
    @sethallison5682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yes hello LEGO I need 74 lbs of B R O W N

  • @linguini667
    @linguini667 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think AT- AT because the sandcrawler has little to no weaponry and yes a ram for the crawler would knock over the walker but by the time it gets close enough the AT-AT’s laser cannons would make it blow up.

  • @Tom-vu1wr
    @Tom-vu1wr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Brilliant but not much interior :(

  • @CC.R0Y
    @CC.R0Y 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's not even a question. The ATAT had long range lasers so it could just blast it from far away without even having to fight

  • @dudebro7227
    @dudebro7227 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Way to stretch it out to that 10 minute mark👍🏻😂

    • @dudebro7227
      @dudebro7227 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol what? I don’t have as blocked and it’s funny bc it’s exactly 10mins😂

  • @northernlego1884
    @northernlego1884 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A stunning piece of art

  • @joshuab2437
    @joshuab2437 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    76 Tuskens disliked this

  • @CptSchmidt
    @CptSchmidt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    No contest AT-AT. The Sandcrawler doesn't have any significant speed... it literally just crawls around. A hit or two from the AT-AT's twin heavy laser canons would take out the sandcrawler's tracks and make it a giant brown scrap pile for target practice.

  • @congratsyoufoundmychannel1098
    @congratsyoufoundmychannel1098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Girls: OMG I just bought my first car Im gonna invited my friends and take them to the Mall!
    *Boys:*

  • @aaronguzmanv
    @aaronguzmanv 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seriously beautiful

  • @CuppaTeaExe
    @CuppaTeaExe 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Yub Nub!!!

    • @ZbricksShow
      @ZbricksShow 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That’s EWOK not Jawa

    • @finley8367
      @finley8367 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      OrangeWither999 that's ewok

    • @RobinSwede
      @RobinSwede 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      No.

    • @ratbat1072
      @ratbat1072 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Utini

    • @ZbricksShow
      @ZbricksShow 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ratbat 1986 that’s more like it!

  • @dxb8086
    @dxb8086 6 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    $60,- for a pdf with a lego instruction... comedy

    • @lightningmcqueengaming7547
      @lightningmcqueengaming7547 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      dXb you realize how many potential hundreds of man hours went into the creation of both this model, and the process of refining the build into something that could be easily laid out via instructions, right? Given the amount of effort and time that was likely sunk into this build, 60 dollars for the instructions is more than reasonable for an undertaking of this scale.

    • @whattheyourgae9627
      @whattheyourgae9627 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lightningmcqueengaming7547 60 is not reasonable for instructions no matter how many hours you put it the instructions for something like this should be 30 max

    • @lightningmcqueengaming7547
      @lightningmcqueengaming7547 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@whattheyourgae9627 that moment when you're wrong

    • @whattheyourgae9627
      @whattheyourgae9627 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lightningmcqueengaming7547 I'm never wrong

    • @whattheyourgae9627
      @whattheyourgae9627 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lightningmcqueengaming7547 plus it's a PDF not proper I stuction books

  • @tzashua
    @tzashua ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a genuine question. Why didn’t you guys add more interior? for example the lava cooling system and more towards the back as accurate as the the real one.

  • @Luislacombe07
    @Luislacombe07 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did you accept lungs to buy the set?