The Good & the Bad of 2 World Championships | Squared Circle Radio

In this clip, Chris & Jared discuss a hot topic amongst wrestling fans: is there really a need for 2 World titles? This discussion spawned from looking back on This Week in Wrestling as 22 years ago, Triple H was awarded the World Heavyweight Championship by Eric Bischoff and created 2 World Championships for the first time. There have been ups and downs over those 22 years with 2 World titles and they guys will discuss them!
Be sure to LIKE the video and SUBSCRIBE to the channel! Also, leave your comments below with your thoughts on having 2 World Championships in WWE.

[@byswartz]

The idea of weight limits can reconcile having two champions, traditionally you have the WWE Champion and the World Heavyweight Champion. One is like an open division, the other is theoretically just the heavyweights.

[@squaredcircleradio]

That’s definitely a potential solution. I feel that you’d still run into the issue of who is really the top champion and why can’t the other guys compete for the big title. But the fact is, actual divisions makes more sense than a world champion on each show. Nonetheless, we appreciate your opinion, be sure to subscribe the show, we would greatly appreciate it!

[@LuisHernandez-xm8fx]

Never liked two world titles. Felt its diluted the roster and championships itself.

[@squaredcircleradio]

Appreciate your feedback! Thank you for checking out our content, please make sure you’re subscribed to the channel if you haven’t already! That would mean so much to us!

[@I_Am_The_Social_Reject]

Two world champions is stupid. The whole point of the world title is to display who is the very best. A brand title means as much as a division title in my eyes. IC and US. The world champion never needed to wrestle on both shows. He can show up a few times a month. What Raw and Smackdown should be focusing on is developing the upcoming talent and legitimizing the contenders. That's why I never had issue with part time champions. It makes it feel less special when the champion is wrestling every week. He's already over. We going to pay to see him. He doesn't need building up. He's the top dog. That way we aren't having random ass matches like having Kevin Owen's getting a title shot just because. Sure it's probably to turn him heel. But you can do that in a non title or him going for IC. I do like open challenges which is fine. But not at a PLE . And also I don't mind a PLE only having IC and US title matches headline without a world title if the match is built up nicely. To me Gunther was the second biggest guy to beat and that was when he was IC champion. Not Seth. Seth was only beating guys that didn't do much to warrant a title shot. Even Seth didn't feel like a threat to Roman to begin with.

[@squaredcircleradio]

Definitely in line with our thinking, love the feedback! Make sure you’re subscribed to the channel if you haven’t already, we would greatly appreciate it!