If you adore Krauss, we have another dumbass who pretends to love science. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
@@RobinLaverick Here's what happens when you give a dumbass common science that they can't contend with, they will completely ignore it and since they are disgusting human beings that don't care, they will think they have something clever to say that makes it look like they are not as stupid as they are, so this is what is considered a good scientific come back to all the science they were provided: Drumroll, please.... their science....."you really need to get some proper professional help buddy. Hope you’re well soon." Yes, I'm serious. I'm not making this up. They are really that stupid. I hope you enjoyed your orgasm as you wrote your word fart. Don't be shy, but did you moan or scream in the climax?
2fast2block you can clearly see these scientists dedicating their entire lives trying to figure this stuff out on behalf of the rest of us ‘dumbasses’. If you disagree with their findings and theories (which is what science is all about after all) then create your own content to contest it, so that we can compare your views. Otherwise you’re nothing better than a troll spouting vitriol in order to promote your religious beliefs; not by proving them but simply attempting to pull down the life’s work of your intellectual betters.
@@RobinLaverick Here's another word fart that can't contend with what I said.... "ou can clearly see these scientists dedicating their entire lives trying to figure this stuff out on behalf of the rest of us ‘dumbasses’. If you disagree with their findings and theories (which is what science is all about after all) then create your own content to contest it, so that we can compare your views." I clearly gave it and you clearly are a dumbass for saying what you said. "therwise you’re nothing better than a troll spouting vitriol in order to promote your religious beliefs; not by proving them but simply attempting to pull down the life’s work of your intellectual betters." As you rub your pussy with pussy juice all over your hands proving you time and time again ignore what I wrote.
@@somesoccerguy4817 Well, he maybe had this scandal for sure, but one is clear, he's a good physicist lecturer and scientist... (PS. I just wonder how people can't resist natural sex drive even smarter one knowing what that may lead him to..)
So electron's behave pretty much like my grandchildren. When I'm keeping an eye on them they behave normally. Take you eye off them for a second and they go nuts.
This is amazing. Lawrence Krauss speaks his science directly into my face. No distracting hosts or moderators, nonsense, etc. Just Krauss right here at my desk. I love it.
He speaks lies directly to your face and other dumbasses like you. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
As a lay person who is fascinated by science, this show is amazing. An up to date,reliable source of what’s new in science. It’s too easy to take what you learn from school, books or documentaries and settle on those ideas and principals getting left behind in outdated ideas. Especially once you have left education. It’s hard to keep somewhat up to date. I loved watching this and I hope many more to come ?!
Gee, you are certainly a dumbass. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Krauss is a joke to real science. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
This is the gutenberg revolution of education. Sean carrol, eric Weinstein, lawrence, jordan peterson, sam harris, audiobooks, scientists on joe rogan's show, etc... i thank God I wasn't born more than 40 years ago.
Thank you professor Krauss. I l always enjoy your lectures. I saw you when you came to Canberra several years ago. it was one of the best lectures I have ever seen. It was on neutrinos and other phenomena , also I noted the great schedule you had at the time. Both me and my girlfriend really appreciated your effort and patience at the time .
Krauss is a dumbass and so are you. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Love this presentation of real science. Keep these coming Dr. Krauss. Your explanation of the big bang age measurement discrepancy as well as the quantum teleportation portion couldn't have been clearer. Many thanks!
You wouldn't know real science if it bit you on your dumb ass. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
what a brilliant name for a podcast. It's like a triple-entendre! Science matters a lot; they're speaking about science matters; and 'matter' is a scientific term :)
You're a dumbass that believes Krauss cares about science. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Thanks for this. I have been blown away on video clips I have seen from you. Among other things, I have taken a pretty big interest in physics and not going to lie, I am pretty green. I am more experienced with computers, and of course quantum mechanics has been super fascinating to me. I am just trying to catch myself up on some pre-quantum mechanics level stuff so I can go farther in my interests. Your explanation of basic stuff helps a lot because the more explanations I get, the more it sparks imagination. I await your next installment to this series.
@@karendahlquist2629 Harris is freaking boring. He's the most monotone scientist and I don't know why they always put him in the mix. He adds the "boring" factor to the conversations.
Thank you Dr Krauss. Great explanation. The next time my nursing supervisor asks where my skilled documentation is I will say it was transported by quantum mechanics.
You're a dumbass follower of Krauss. You care nothing about science. Just keep lying. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Thank you Dr. Krauss, it is wonderful to see you again. I think the measurement of the expansion of the universe would be very easy. Just take a string to the edge of the universe, tack it down and see how fast it plays out. Voile, measurement done!! :-)
Interesting round up of some cutting edge science. Yep quantum superposition always makes my head hurt 😊 I still think we are at the at the level of the 2d flatardians peering into 3d space. We will get there though 👍
You're a dumbass believing his crap. Pure dumbass. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Krause has a very elegant way of explaining complex theories which opens doors to the layman (myself included), these of course generate more questions, fascinating. Gauge symmetry was superb, conceptually I had a basic understanding on the first go round. My new question centers on locality of information, my supposition is that all information in the universe is contained within every quantum particle, e.g., the universe is similar (in a crude fashion) to a human brain, what you need to reconstruct it is not stored in one place. From this can one extrapolate that the universe or multi-verse is a conscious entity and we are just localized/concentrated manifestations? Matter, inanimate or animate is conscious, we just operate within a specific plane of consciousness which we define as higher as our tendency is always to put mankind at the center.
Wow, are we seriously able to send informations through quantum entanglement now?! That's huge! Why I don't see this in the news? The future is bright my friends!
Yeah, makeup whatever you have to with NO proof then act as if you care about science. You're a dumbass punk. Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass. th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity. th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html creation.com/laws-of-information-1 creation.com/laws-of-information-2 To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing". But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then. *Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.* "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning. www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not. From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand. Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have. th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things. www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1 "One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began." "The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem." "Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!" Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing. From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Wonderful stuff! I remember how we started with USB jump drives that were only 56 MB, then later 128 then 512 became possible, etc... Now the quantum system only has 3 degrees of freedom, soon it'll be 6 degrees and so on.
Prof. Krauss, would you mind clarifying the following? Btw thanks again for signing my "The Pleasure of Finding Things Out" in Tenerife. at 21:05 you talk about how before the measurement they're pointing in all directions at the same time. In a superposition state. Wouldn't that also include those positions where the particles are not anti-aligned? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thank you very much for this incredible information. I have a question; who is this person on a picture in a frame on your desk? He looks quite scary to me....
I think the problem with measuring the Universe Expansion lies with the problem of TIME! We are analysing light spectrum from near intitial formation of the universe where the speed of matter is hugely influenced by the Big Bang expansion rather than a generic Universal expansion!
Miles Davis, I had the same thought. The references to "magical" and "miraculous" are troublesome for the very reason you stated. Someone is going to take those soundbites and use them against the science, quoting the eminent Dr. Krauss. While anyone who is familiar with him and his work will get his meaning, some deceptive fool could, and probably will, skew this to promote a religious agenda. Having said that, a really interesting and insightful talk as usual, and I'm happy to hear his voice again. Looking forward to more of the same.
How long does it take for water to become saturated with the minerals that make it salt water? Is it possible that the early oceans and other flooded basins weren't nearly as salty as they are now?
Interesting. But I still do not understand how 1. entangled (split?) particles are contained and then one (half) "sent" to places like the ISS (seconds to minutes away) or to Sol (8 minutes away) or to "Alpha Centauri" (4.367 light years away) and then 2. both members of one entangled pair are measured at exactly the same moment to determine the direction of their "spin" at that moment. How are the two particles stored and in what? How are each of these teeny weeny particles identified and then measured? With what are they measured? How do you find a tweeny weeny previously entangled particle on Sol or Apha Centauri? How are they contained? How are they sent? How are they located after being sent? How are they measured similtaneously? Or are these examples just hyperbole for processes that might be possible, but have never actually been done? Please explain in much more detail, Lawrence.
I'd imagine we would need to transfer the entangled particle to Alpha Centauri first but then you can carry on with faster than light speed transport. Maybe transport some other entangled particles. I don't know enough about quantum mechanics but I don't understand why communication through entangled particles is so difficult. I mean, the problems I have heard have similar solutions, like mores code, coded messages, preambles, pre-agreed upon codes. There is no way to narrow down the probability of receiving patterns? We can't associate positions with certain letters or numbers. If they are intelligible and if a preamble is used what are the odds of a perfectly formed message with an expected pre-amble and encrypted in a way to make it even more rare of message coming from anywhere other than the source, and then with the quantum encryption to prevent snooping or manipulating the message? What am I missing? I know I am not that smart. I know there are some crazy smart people working with this stuff.
Outstanding. Thank you for such great content. Great application of entanglement/teleportation is quantum radar. Renders stealth tech meaningless. Apparently low energy and wide area coverage. I think China was boasting it. Really clever how they purport to do it.
Please don't stop and keep doing what you doing.. Can't thank you enough
I am a Biochemistry major and I gotta say, the man's passion in science drives mine to very high levels. Thank you Prof Krauss
If you adore Krauss, we have another dumbass who pretends to love science.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
2fast2block you really need to get some proper professional help buddy. Hope you’re well soon.
@@RobinLaverick Here's what happens when you give a dumbass common science that they can't contend with, they will completely ignore it and since they are disgusting human beings that don't care, they will think they have something clever to say that makes it look like they are not as stupid as they are, so this is what is considered a good scientific come back to all the science they were provided:
Drumroll, please.... their science....."you really need to get some proper professional help buddy. Hope you’re well soon."
Yes, I'm serious. I'm not making this up. They are really that stupid.
I hope you enjoyed your orgasm as you wrote your word fart. Don't be shy, but did you moan or scream in the climax?
2fast2block you can clearly see these scientists dedicating their entire lives trying to figure this stuff out on behalf of the rest of us ‘dumbasses’. If you disagree with their findings and theories (which is what science is all about after all) then create your own content to contest it, so that we can compare your views. Otherwise you’re nothing better than a troll spouting vitriol in order to promote your religious beliefs; not by proving them but simply attempting to pull down the life’s work of your intellectual betters.
@@RobinLaverick Here's another word fart that can't contend with what I said....
"ou can clearly see these scientists dedicating their entire lives trying to figure this stuff out on behalf of the rest of us ‘dumbasses’. If you disagree with their findings and theories (which is what science is all about after all) then create your own content to contest it, so that we can compare your views."
I clearly gave it and you clearly are a dumbass for saying what you said.
"therwise you’re nothing better than a troll spouting vitriol in order to promote your religious beliefs; not by proving them but simply attempting to pull down the life’s work of your intellectual betters."
As you rub your pussy with pussy juice all over your hands proving you time and time again ignore what I wrote.
I’m so glad to see you back lecturing on youtube. Thanks professor.
Thanks Prof. Krauss it feels like you're my own personal professor very cool !!
I bet he's your hero! www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/ex-asu-prof-defended-jeffrey-epstein-before-sex-scandal-11326549
@Alset Alokin I know, Krauss really is unbelievable. Thanks for the comment.
@@somesoccerguy4817 Well, he maybe had this scandal for sure, but one is clear, he's a good physicist lecturer and scientist... (PS. I just wonder how people can't resist natural sex drive even smarter one knowing what that may lead him to..)
Hitchens called Lawrence his personal Physicist.
CMEK : what was that line? “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone”?
Great to see Prof. Krauss back on air!
So electron's behave pretty much like my grandchildren. When I'm keeping an eye on them they behave normally. Take you eye off them for a second and they go nuts.
There's also the matter of toddler entanglement.
That is a great abstraction that had me laughing heaps. Well said.
Don't ever stop teaching please. One of my favourite people.
This is amazing. Lawrence Krauss speaks his science directly into my face. No distracting hosts or moderators, nonsense, etc. Just Krauss right here at my desk. I love it.
He speaks lies directly to your face and other dumbasses like you.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
As a lay person who is fascinated by science, this show is amazing. An up to date,reliable source of what’s new in science. It’s too easy to take what you learn from school, books or documentaries and settle on those ideas and principals getting left behind in outdated ideas. Especially once you have left education. It’s hard to keep somewhat up to date. I loved watching this and I hope many more to come ?!
Thank You Prof. Krauss! You have a genuine gift for taking complicated topics and making them both understandable and exciting.
Gee, you are certainly a dumbass.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
My favorite TH-cam show already
I hope to see more!
Glad to see Dr Krauss back educating and entertaining the public.
Gross.
Thank you for creating the greatest channel on TH-cam.
You are such a huge inspiration. Your passion for science is so contagious, you make artists want to do more art.
Lol you fucking fairy!
www.chronicle.com/article/3-Revelations-From-the/244887
Not inspirational at all.
Krauss is a joke to real science.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Krauss at his best! - Thank you Lawrence
This is the gutenberg revolution of education. Sean carrol, eric Weinstein, lawrence, jordan peterson, sam harris, audiobooks, scientists on joe rogan's show, etc... i thank God I wasn't born more than 40 years ago.
Professor Krauss, thank you for not underestimating your audience, it's very refreshing.
I admire your shirts, they are special. This one, with phases of the moon on it is my favorite.
Thank you DR. Krauss, great lecture, looking forward to the next one
Thank you! I absolutely LOVE these episodes!!
I love you for these videos Mr. Krause.
Thank you !!! And - you are still VERY young
Stay well and healthy - your books, conferences and now podcasts are - a treasure
Thank you professor Krauss. I l always enjoy your lectures. I saw you when you came to Canberra several years ago. it was one of the best lectures I have ever seen. It was on neutrinos and other phenomena , also I noted the great schedule you had at the time. Both me and my girlfriend really appreciated your effort and patience at the time .
Krauss is a dumbass and so are you.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Nice to have you back Lawrence. ✨
I didn't understand a word of it, but was thoroughly fixated to the end. Keep them coming!
Science matters! This one is my favorite so far.. thank you. I've learned so much from you, I appreciate you🙏
Love this presentation of real science. Keep these coming Dr. Krauss. Your explanation of the big bang age measurement discrepancy as well as the quantum teleportation portion couldn't have been clearer. Many thanks!
You wouldn't know real science if it bit you on your dumb ass.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
what a brilliant name for a podcast. It's like a triple-entendre! Science matters a lot; they're speaking about science matters; and 'matter' is a scientific term :)
Thanks professor Krauss. I really like the way you get excited when you talk about science.
You're a dumbass that believes Krauss cares about science.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
I love THIS soooo much! Thank you, Professor Krauss. "Takes hats off and bows..."
I LOVE THIS STUFF! THANKS DR. KRAUSS!!
Been looking for your content, glad your going your own way. Look forward to more.
Once again, thank you. Please go on doing what you are best at.
Thank you, Dr. Krauss! Miss you on AZ PBS. Is Ted Simons as awesome in person as he seems on TV?
Pathetic
www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/ex-asu-prof-defended-jeffrey-epstein-before-sex-scandal-11326549
@陈天龙 shut your dumb liberal ass up, pretending to be some kind of conservative yet protecting this damn predator.
Glad I found your channel. Missed your work, recently.
He's been grieving, lost his job, lost his best buddy.. tough times.
Sooooo glad to see you back preaching the knowledge sir!!!
Thanks for this. I have been blown away on video clips I have seen from you. Among other things, I have taken a pretty big interest in physics and not going to lie, I am pretty green. I am more experienced with computers, and of course quantum mechanics has been super fascinating to me. I am just trying to catch myself up on some pre-quantum mechanics level stuff so I can go farther in my interests. Your explanation of basic stuff helps a lot because the more explanations I get, the more it sparks imagination. I await your next installment to this series.
I love it. my mind is spinning with amazement and joy!!! You and Hitch and Harris are my favs
Mine also.
@@jgeorge2465 we'll shake on it.
I would exclude Sam Harris
@@Petrov3434- Your loss
@@karendahlquist2629 Harris is freaking boring. He's the most monotone scientist and I don't know why they always put him in the mix. He adds the "boring" factor to the conversations.
My favorite prof. You make life matters
Nice!!!!!!
Thank you Dr Krauss. Great explanation. The next time my nursing supervisor asks where my skilled documentation is I will say it was transported by quantum mechanics.
You're a dumbass follower of Krauss. You care nothing about science. Just keep lying.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Aaaaah this is like a hug from 2011. Glad you're doing such a great podcast!
Thank you Dr. Krauss, it is wonderful to see you again. I think the measurement of the expansion of the universe would be very easy. Just take a string to the edge of the universe, tack it down and see how fast it plays out. Voile, measurement done!! :-)
Interesting round up of some cutting edge science. Yep quantum superposition always makes my head hurt 😊 I still think we are at the at the level of the 2d flatardians peering into 3d space. We will get there though 👍
You're a dumbass believing his crap. Pure dumbass.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
I agree wholeheartedly with your view on the viability of quantum teleportation over it's computing relation.
Welcome to the 21st century Lawrence! Thank god you're finally doing podcasts 😂😂
love these episodes! please keep them coming!
Thank you for digesting these papers in such an illuminating way!
thanks professor lawrence krauss
Krause has a very elegant way of explaining complex theories which opens doors to the layman (myself included), these of course generate more questions, fascinating. Gauge symmetry was superb, conceptually I had a basic understanding on the first go round. My new question centers on locality of information, my supposition is that all information in the universe is contained within every quantum particle, e.g., the universe is similar (in a crude fashion) to a human brain, what you need to reconstruct it is not stored in one place. From this can one extrapolate that the universe or multi-verse is a conscious entity and we are just localized/concentrated manifestations? Matter, inanimate or animate is conscious, we just operate within a specific plane of consciousness which we define as higher as our tendency is always to put mankind at the center.
Looking forward to the next episode!!!!
Very well presented Professor Krauss!!
Awesome, I love this, thanks Prof. 😀♥️
Keep doing these videos. I Love these!!
Very good podcast. Thank you
I wish my teachers had the same passion and tenacity. I didn’t like physics until I was 42
Wow, are we seriously able to send informations through quantum entanglement now?! That's huge! Why I don't see this in the news? The future is bright my friends!
Thank you, fantastic show, keep it up.
Great podcast. Please provide a link to the slides.
I wish I knew earlier in life that my head was never, ever going to quantum tunnel through that brick wall.
This is absolutely fascinating! I wish I knew science was this cool in high school! I'd have a totally different career.
My day just got better
The second part reminds me of my Quantum Mechanics 1 class. My Quantum Mechanics 2 class was 1/4 the size of QM1. lol.
Great series!
The multi verse loves L.K....keep up the goooood work!
Yeah, makeup whatever you have to with NO proof then act as if you care about science. You're a dumbass punk.
Krauss, "The universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life."
Just past 18:00 here: th-cam.com/video/7ImvlS8PLIo/w-d-xo.html
That's not based on science but only Krauss farting that out of his dumb ass.
th-cam.com/video/zU7Lww-sBPg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/r4sP1E1Jd_Y/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Ymjlrw6GmKU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/L0-hgSjnomA/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/5AXkrc2OSs4/w-d-xo.html
Life takes information to proceed on. But to atheists/agnostics, chaos through time gave us information. Although it's even hard to write such a ridiculous statement, they believe it. All one can do is laugh at such stupidity.
th-cam.com/video/aA-FcnLsF1g/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/7c9PaZzsqEg/w-d-xo.html
creation.com/laws-of-information-1
creation.com/laws-of-information-2
To this dumbass, it's ok to say that space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, ALL being there ALREADY with NO explanation of how, is OK to call "nothing". There, by that alone, Krauss excused himself of all of that. You simply come up with a childish snot-nosed brat excuse to call it "nothing".
But it gets worse, space, matter, time, and the laws of physics, called nothing, created more space, matter, and time. The laws of physics were broken to create more space, matter, and time. Keep in mind (for those that have a working mind), that this "nothing" was eternal, and just by chance about 13 billion years ago according to Krauss, then did its magic. The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics were asleep then.
*Krauss' attempt to dispell the need of God, just confirms the need.*
"A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space"
from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html
"Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."-
from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0
"That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing."
from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5
And this "nothing" from chaos gave us the fine-tuning.
www.inplainsite.org/html/anthropic_principles.html
kgov.com/fine-tuning-of-the-universe
I like starting from the beginning because it shows how we got something to begin with. Not just that, it shows from the start who gave up their logic and who did not.
From all we know, creation HAD to be a supernatural event. The first logical and honest step is to admit that. The second step is to seek who or what did the supernatural event and the proof for that. Fools jump to 'who created god', 'god of the gaps', 'science does not deal with supernatural' and whatever excuse they can use to prevent them from seeing the truth. All they can do is fart smoke screens to avoid the issue at hand.
Those that deny it was a supernatural event, such a Krauss, Dawkins and a whole host of other fools, live in their fairytale of just making things up with nothing to back them. They say things so outrageous that they ask you to give up your common sense for science. Krauss and Dawkins go back and forth calling it "literally nothing" knowing it is something, and even their something can't produce what we have.
th-cam.com/video/UT3dfPOdAYU/w-d-xo.html
Krauss admits he does not give a damn what nothing means and he then says he wants to be honest with his readers. He is full of doublespeak. He is WRONG and all he has is pride to continue saying such stupid things.
www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=1
"One unsolved mystery is why there is an excess of mater in our universe; this is the Matter/antimatter problem. Why is the universe only made of matter? Matter/antimatter particles annihilate each other to produce radiation. Radiation coverts to equal amounts of matter and anti matter. Krauss says that the CMB suggests the photon-to-proton ratio was a billion to one. He says that by ‘plausible quantum processes’ the universe started out with 1 part per billion more matter than antimatter. Most of the matter and antimatter combined to make photons. Later he admits we still don’t really know how this asymmetry between matter and antimatter began."
"The energy calculated for empty space assuming virtual particles is 10 to the 120 times greater than that observed. This is a long-standing unsolved problem."
"Krauss also says that this proves you can get something from nothing given the energetics of empty space and the law of gravity. So he says you can get a universe from nothing if you can start with empty space with non-zero energy and the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics. He admits empty space with non-zero energy is something!"
Quotes from another review of Krauss' book here: creation.com/review-krauss-universe-from-nothing
You can read Hawking, Krauss, Dawkins, and others who praise their gravity but they just made it up and have no idea where it could have come from. And the list goes on. All they have comes down to nothing.
From the start, fools gave up their logic and that does not bother them. When it does not bother someone from the start, they continue giving up their logic with what follows.
Wow. What a wonderful description
Wonderful stuff! I remember how we started with USB jump drives that were only 56 MB, then later 128 then 512 became possible, etc...
Now the quantum system only has 3 degrees of freedom, soon it'll be 6 degrees and so on.
Thank you Prof Krauss for all this. so interesting!
btw, you keep saying "my age".... I looked it out and frankly you look great. keep going :)
We missed you a lot professor.
Thanks prof. !!
Fantastic show, Lawrence! Carl Sagan would've been entranced.
Thanks Prof Krauss
That was fantastic. Thank you!
Great episode.
Thank you, Lawrence.
Many thanks
Kruss is my hero
Keep educating SIR.!
Do you think that the two main assumptions of the standard model of cosmology - homogeneity and isotropy - are true/correct?
Love it!
very enjoyable and informative video.
Thank you!
love it verry interesting good work. manny thanks
Well done and fascinating! Please keep up the good work :-)
I have a question for your since you talk about quantum mechanics. at t=0. in nothing how you created time. at which scale, rolex or armani?
YES LAURENCE YES!
Prof. Krauss, would you mind clarifying the following? Btw thanks again for signing my "The Pleasure of Finding Things Out" in Tenerife.
at 21:05 you talk about how before the measurement they're pointing in all directions at the same time. In a superposition state.
Wouldn't that also include those positions where the particles are not anti-aligned?
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
HI.. no they are always anti-aligned if they were created in that state. best.. see you in Tenerife next year.
Thank you very much for this incredible information. I have a question; who is this person on a picture in a frame on your desk? He looks quite scary to me....
What is the framed art-image of a face (under a lamp at Dr. Krauss' right hand side)?
I think the problem with measuring the Universe Expansion lies with the problem of TIME! We are analysing light spectrum from near intitial formation of the universe where the speed of matter is hugely influenced by the Big Bang expansion rather than a generic Universal expansion!
The creepy face in the frame caught my attention and now I'm noticing Kirk, Frankenstein, Gogh's screaming guy, a gnome. Is there even a theme?
Love listening to professor Krauss! 😂 👍 ☘
Have a glass of red on me tonight, and we'll toast to the memory of old Hitchypoohs✌️🍷
Miles Davis, I had the same thought. The references to "magical" and "miraculous" are troublesome for the very reason you stated. Someone is going to take those soundbites and use them against the science, quoting the eminent Dr. Krauss. While anyone who is familiar with him and his work will get his meaning, some deceptive fool could, and probably will, skew this to promote a religious agenda.
Having said that, a really interesting and insightful talk as usual, and I'm happy to hear his voice again. Looking forward to more of the same.
How long does it take for water to become saturated with the minerals that make it salt water? Is it possible that the early oceans and other flooded basins weren't nearly as salty as they are now?
Interesting. But I still do not understand how 1. entangled (split?) particles are contained and then one (half) "sent" to places like the ISS (seconds to minutes away) or to Sol (8 minutes away) or to "Alpha Centauri" (4.367 light years away) and then 2. both members of one entangled pair are measured at exactly the same moment to determine the direction of their "spin" at that moment. How are the two particles stored and in what? How are each of these teeny weeny particles identified and then measured? With what are they measured? How do you find a tweeny weeny previously entangled particle on Sol or Apha Centauri?
How are they contained? How are they sent? How are they located after being sent? How are they measured similtaneously?
Or are these examples just hyperbole for processes that might be possible, but have never actually been done?
Please explain in much more detail, Lawrence.
I'd imagine we would need to transfer the entangled particle to Alpha Centauri first but then you can carry on with faster than light speed transport. Maybe transport some other entangled particles. I don't know enough about quantum mechanics but I don't understand why communication through entangled particles is so difficult. I mean, the problems I have heard have similar solutions, like mores code, coded messages, preambles, pre-agreed upon codes. There is no way to narrow down the probability of receiving patterns? We can't associate positions with certain letters or numbers. If they are intelligible and if a preamble is used what are the odds of a perfectly formed message with an expected pre-amble and encrypted in a way to make it even more rare of message coming from anywhere other than the source, and then with the quantum encryption to prevent snooping or manipulating the message? What am I missing? I know I am not that smart. I know there are some crazy smart people working with this stuff.
Moon phases on the shirt :)...
More More Moooore
Outstanding. Thank you for such great content. Great application of entanglement/teleportation is quantum radar. Renders stealth tech meaningless. Apparently low energy and wide area coverage. I think China was boasting it. Really clever how they purport to do it.
Love your channel 💕
How fast am I moving in the universe? Sum up rotation of earth, rotation of solar system, and expansion speed?