For all those who are fascinated and inspired by this great old man; do not stop at that. A C T. Don't just share the video online. Instead, do get involved where you can. That is the message of the interview. No one will stand up for you. Everyone has to stand up for themselves.
With respect, listening to Chomsky has rarely if ever been about action. While I admire his evident civic virtue, he seems to be mostly content to provide an information service re geopolitcs to fake progressives on the largely fake left. I too long for more action, but doubt anything will grow from Chomsky. Give me an MLK anyday over the commentariat, regardless of how intelligent it appears to be!
@@PK-re3lu You mean Martin Luther King? You should be suspicious of rhetoriticians, of the charismatic and the oratorically gifted. Such skills can just as easily invigorate destructive forces as progressive ones. Chomsky presents facts in a calm and dignified way which is a far more persuasive way to go. Chomsky's message has always been a call to action, just listen to this damn video! But he has never been prescriptive because there is no prescription, the world is far too complicated and unpredictable to lay out Commandments. Organise, educate, tell the truth.
@@chomskysarmy3965 I remember watching an interview where Chomsky said he can't bear to listen to MLK speeches because of its appeal to emotions and not for understanding. And there's an interview in which he said people like MLK and Rosa Parks are just riding the crest of some wave. The wave are the people who worked on the ground, got beat up by the police, organized meetings and talks during the civil rights movement. And I think he's right. We tend to focus our attention to so called leaders often forgetting the people who do the real hard work, people whose names won't be written in history books.
Wow, just wow. ...Prof. Chomsky's takes on a series of these topics are some of his most important & most cogent that I've heard in years. ...He's still crushing it and showing us the nature of the struggle we have ahead. If we accept the challenge and have the courage to face facts, to unify and to work towards real progress we can achieve it. Let's frickin' go people! "...There can be change again, but not if you sit there obedient and acquiescent. In a free society, acquiescence equals support." (@1:10:25)
...the Tsadik is under the subtitles and we can see the face of the nobody. It's a war on the humble, the poor, the people. The plutocrats won now all is in the hands of the one that one who doesn't exist for existence will be a limitation of his being that can't be for he is Eternal infinite omniscient omnipresent omnipotent. He lack nothing except YOU! Without you he is no complete how can he be without YOU 🔱 🦄
That's an ironic statement of sorts, don't you think? I use irony for want of a better word, like perhaps you used anarchy . What you are perhaps talking about is fascism disguised as communism. Communism in the true sense is ever emerging, and anarchism is just plain logic, in my mind.
@@bwuntypartrupube3950 actualy was thinking on the buiseness owners to see that profit sharing among all involved is obligatory and to banish all those middle man that have nothing to do with production and see them as parasites that they are
Noam Chomsky - the father of modern linguistics, a brave and courageous political activist -- but when I asked him if he knew the name of the Boston Red Sox player who back in the 1960s left the team bus with Gene Conley and on a whim they both took off for Israel ... he never responded. Other than that, he's perfect. ... Noam Chomsky, I mean. ... Gene Conley couldn't throw a curve ball for shit. .
47.00 The anti-semitism issue may have been a good and big news story, but was nowhere on the electorate's radar. Despite the strong showing for Labour in 2017 (they came from nowhere to narrowly missing a win) some traditional Labour stronghold seats were lost to the Tories. In 2017 Labour did well among students and young urban middle class left, but support was starting to slip among the northern working class. The issue was not any of Labour's policies as such, but Labour's failure to support their natural constituency; the working class, and their decision in the EU Referendum, which had been to Leave. By the 2019 Gen Election, Corbyn had tried to take both sides and pleased neither, and nor had he addressed the one and only reason why the working class voted Leave which was not race, but the free-movement of people in the EU. There had been consequent unemployment in the UK among the semi-skilled and unskilled workforce, such jobs(it was felt) having been overrun by amiable aliens. Corbyn never resolved the conflict of mindset between the middle-class Labour "Left" and the real working class Labour Left, whose imperatives are quite different. So in December 2019 he did reasonably well in middle-class leftist areas, but managed to lose Labour most of their natural power base in the north, their worst showing since I believe 1935
I don't really understand why the title says "Father of Modern Linguistics". This is accurate, but gives a false impression of what the interview is about, it's all about politics and there's not a single linguistics question!
@@seansmith3058 Fair point, although I stand by my point that most of the interview is about politics and they could have at least emphasised the political side of his work in the video title and description
This is very pro institution They all mean very well, and the debate on corona virus was superb, but. And how could anyone say anything of trump that is not about theatre. Or even promote any of the U.S. presidents, their administration, or any administration. Corporations corporations. That and their advertisers. Hypnotic. But at the same time the truly smart guys will win us all, and are winning, a perfection.
Chomsky is an anatchist thinker what hes talking about with the need for social welfare isnt pro insitutuion its pro people. With the system we currently have its important to understand that this is the best solution.
@@bwuntypartrupube3950 like how less than 1% of world population ended up with half of its wealth, how taxpayer money is used or should I say abused to bailout the rich, bomb children, subsidize oil companies who are destroying the planet.whereas the same people are denied basic healthcare, free education because there isn't "enough" fund?
@@dingdingdingding2871 Yes but wealth is to be found in other ways. Potential of the human mind means that this is a grain of sand. Through altruism, macrobiotics ( www.9starki.com/shiawase.htm ), understanding, learning, comedy, quantum physics, string theory, variety, to name a few things, the individual can achieve more than one can imagine is possible. You are right, but things are getting better, and it's the media that helps the walls to seem closer. Corporations are realising, for survival at least, that ethical practices are a growing trend and necessary. That's what i see.
He is the only person to wich I wish eternal life
+ Hamza Yusuf
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ take my energy Chomsky
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
@J and M lul what r u saying m8
For all those who are fascinated and inspired by this great old man; do not stop at that. A C T. Don't just share the video online. Instead, do get involved where you can. That is the message of the interview. No one will stand up for you. Everyone has to stand up for themselves.
With respect, listening to Chomsky has rarely if ever been about action. While I admire his evident civic virtue, he seems to be mostly content to provide an information service re geopolitcs to fake progressives on the largely fake left. I too long for more action, but doubt anything will grow from Chomsky. Give me an MLK anyday over the commentariat, regardless of how intelligent it appears to be!
@@PK-re3lu You mean Martin Luther King? You should be suspicious of rhetoriticians, of the charismatic and the oratorically gifted. Such skills can just as easily invigorate destructive forces as progressive ones. Chomsky presents facts in a calm and dignified way which is a far more persuasive way to go.
Chomsky's message has always been a call to action, just listen to this damn video! But he has never been prescriptive because there is no prescription, the world is far too complicated and unpredictable to lay out Commandments. Organise, educate, tell the truth.
@@chomskysarmy3965 I remember watching an interview where Chomsky said he can't bear to listen to MLK speeches because of its appeal to emotions and not for understanding. And there's an interview in which he said people like MLK and Rosa Parks are just riding the crest of some wave. The wave are the people who worked on the ground, got beat up by the police, organized meetings and talks during the civil rights movement. And I think he's right. We tend to focus our attention to so called leaders often forgetting the people who do the real hard work, people whose names won't be written in history books.
@J and M Chomsky's white? That's news to me...
@J and M cringe
His Macbook still hasn’t moved since his previous webinars last month 😂 Noam is a hero
Professor Noam Chomsky,
I wish to express to you my gratitude for sharing your knowledge with the world.
All my respects to you
Sir Noam Chomsky.
Right, here’s the exception of the saying that anyone can be replaced.
his linguistic theories have been
Always clear and direct. Thank you Professor Chomsky.
Wow, just wow. ...Prof. Chomsky's takes on a series of these topics are some of his most important & most cogent that I've heard in years. ...He's still crushing it and showing us the nature of the struggle we have ahead. If we accept the challenge and have the courage to face facts, to unify and to work towards real progress we can achieve it. Let's frickin' go people!
"...There can be change again, but not if you sit there obedient and acquiescent. In a free society, acquiescence equals support." (@1:10:25)
Read Lenin's State & Revolution
Thank you very much,
Dear friends!
Hello from Moscow.
Chomsky: *way out of human annihilation*
Interviewer: Interesting
Don't be shouting "Class War" at Cambridge
J and M Only the very educated ones. Overall support for socialism is higher at lower incomes like one would expect
@J and M cringe
Amazing. What a source of knowledge.
he looks pretty healthy in this video, good
00:08:38
Long live Chomsky! The most important man in the political and social sphere
Its sad that he has aged so much in the last year. This shows you can keep your brain functioning at such an age if you use it.
8:38 for the start.
20:43 for the fart
amazing, master chomsky.
Did anyone understand what he said here: 24:54 ? "[...] the interests of power and profit will create the ???"
..."world they want"
...the Tsadik is under the subtitles and we can see the face of the nobody.
It's a war on the humble, the poor, the people.
The plutocrats won now all is in the hands of the one that one who doesn't exist for existence will be a limitation of his being that can't be for he is Eternal infinite omniscient omnipresent omnipotent.
He lack nothing except YOU!
Without you he is no complete
how can he be without YOU 🔱
🦄
i dont like how often he keeps talking about nuclear war
do you think that its possible to establish a workable Anarhist sistem after this forced time off period that gave people time to rethink about basics
That's an ironic statement of sorts, don't you think? I use irony for want of a better word, like perhaps you used anarchy . What you are perhaps talking about is fascism disguised as communism. Communism in the true sense is ever emerging, and anarchism is just plain logic, in my mind.
@@bwuntypartrupube3950 actualy was thinking on the buiseness owners to see that profit sharing among all involved is obligatory and to banish all those middle man that have nothing to do with production and see them as parasites that they are
@@mihdoli7225 Little more complicated than that though.
Noam Chomsky - the father of modern linguistics, a brave and courageous political activist -- but when I asked him if he knew the name of the Boston Red Sox player who back in the 1960s left the team bus with Gene Conley and on a whim they both took off for Israel ... he never responded.
Other than that, he's perfect. ... Noam Chomsky, I mean. ... Gene Conley couldn't throw a curve ball for shit.
.
How exactly did you ask him, would you copy and paste?
I can’t believe you even edited the comment
@@compagniaelvira Please elaborate.
47.00 The anti-semitism issue may have been a good and big news story, but was nowhere on the electorate's radar.
Despite the strong showing for Labour in 2017 (they came from nowhere to narrowly missing a win) some traditional Labour stronghold seats were lost to the Tories. In 2017 Labour did well among students and young urban middle class left, but support was starting to slip among the northern working class. The issue was not any of Labour's policies as such, but Labour's failure to support their natural constituency; the working class, and their decision in the EU Referendum, which had been to Leave.
By the 2019 Gen Election, Corbyn had tried to take both sides and pleased neither, and nor had he addressed the one and only reason why the working class voted Leave which was not race, but the free-movement of people in the EU. There had been consequent unemployment in the UK among the semi-skilled and unskilled workforce, such jobs(it was felt) having been overrun by amiable aliens. Corbyn never resolved the conflict of mindset between the middle-class Labour "Left" and the real working class Labour Left, whose imperatives are quite different. So in December 2019 he did reasonably well in middle-class leftist areas, but managed to lose Labour most of their natural power base in the north, their worst showing since I believe 1935
damn i just missed it!
no you didn't
I don't really understand why the title says "Father of Modern Linguistics". This is accurate, but gives a false impression of what the interview is about, it's all about politics and there's not a single linguistics question!
th-cam.com/video/VUYYZdE5Dmk/w-d-xo.html
45:24
49:00
@@seansmith3058 Fair point, although I stand by my point that most of the interview is about politics and they could have at least emphasised the political side of his work in the video title and description
Interesting what happens when you dont have all the facts
free helicopter rides everybody !!!!!!!
This is very pro institution They all mean very well, and the debate on corona virus was superb, but. And how could anyone say anything of trump that is not about theatre. Or even promote any of the U.S. presidents, their administration, or any administration. Corporations corporations. That and their advertisers. Hypnotic. But at the same time the truly smart guys will win us all, and are winning, a perfection.
Chomsky is an anatchist thinker what hes talking about with the need for social welfare isnt pro insitutuion its pro people. With the system we currently have its important to understand that this is the best solution.
@@user-fk9ic6td8n I agree with most of what you are saying, and yes, this is the best solution. There are more factors to consider, i think.
@@bwuntypartrupube3950 like how less than 1% of world population ended up with half of its wealth, how taxpayer money is used or should I say abused to bailout the rich, bomb children, subsidize oil companies who are destroying the planet.whereas the same people are denied basic healthcare, free education because there isn't "enough" fund?
@@dingdingdingding2871 Yes but wealth is to be found in other ways. Potential of the human mind means that this is a grain of sand. Through altruism, macrobiotics ( www.9starki.com/shiawase.htm ), understanding, learning, comedy, quantum physics, string theory, variety, to name a few things, the individual can achieve more than one can imagine is possible. You are right, but things are getting better, and it's the media that helps the walls to seem closer.
Corporations are realising, for survival at least, that ethical practices are a growing trend and necessary. That's what i see.
He's not the father of modern linguistics, Saussure was but theoretical linguistics like Chomsky's is full of holes. Hype and nothing else.
LOL.
@@seansmith3058 ?
Beautiful point!
@@PK-re3lu Nativist BS lol.
It's all for our protection, a means to an end. I think.