Can we take a moment to appreciate this lawyer's work ? This guy destroyed almost every expert he faced. People only talk about Camille but this man is excellent.
I don't see ANYBODY giving Wayne Dennison his respect. He has literally refuted all the big hitters of Amber and dismantled them thoroughly. Aside from camille, Wayne has literally been one of the biggest integral parts of this trial.
💯 those two are the superstar attorneys of this trial, but the proof will be in the end result. We'll soon see if the jury is actually capable of recognizing their brilliance, and see through the vile nature behind the defense tactics. Defamation is exceedingly difficult to prove, and has ramifications for how the first amendment is interpreted. That isn't to say that I don't believe that it JD should win, or that AH needs to go back to the trailer park she grew up in and live out the rest of her days in reclusive squalor, I just have little to no faith in the jury
@@Sharon... Lol, okay fine, perhaps I'm guilty of attributing too much anthropomorphism to the maggot. Perhaps she should crawl back into the cesspool that spawned her. Better?
I love Wayne, from the start - his manner, his tactics and as you mentioned, his cross-examinations were critical to this case. It was beautiful when he cross-examined the metadata forensic 'expert' yesterday and showed him the two photos as being created at exactly the same time, with an app that does 'sorting' and 'EDITING'..!
Like someone has already said somewhere down here in the comment section, she did that on purpose, this test was for the court not for the patient, basically she did what she was paid for.
It's Bad, Dr Hughes seems Gullible & Uneducated...She Also is Rude& Talks on top of the Lawyer, She's Very Irresponsible & has a Bad Demenior..It Would Not Surprise me if she got Paid to Lie??
When I see this stuff, I feel like the medical communities need to widen their net on maintaining credibility. Work like this should result in malpractice hearings, with the potential of being publicly and officially discredited by your peers if you're demonstrated to knowingly violate ethical practices
This lawyer doesn't get enough credit. He's done an incredible job in this trial, especially because his whole approach is a rather bumbling Colombo style delivery. Yet he hits the mark every time, makes his point every time, and always leaves the questioning on a high point for the defence. The best example being when he was talking about the 'Justice for Johnny Depp' hashtag (which he kept repeating - deliberately on purpose haha) and got the witness to agree that it wasn't offensive or detrimental to Ms. Heard. The witness said 'I'm a big fan of justice' and this guy says 'Me too. No further questions'. it was brilliant!
I thought he was odd when i first seen him. Hes more low key genius where camilee is more obvious. Hes more like the one low key worming is way in for the kill
Yup, blatantly implying that her experience outweighs procedures that are documented through the combined efforts of other experts throughout history of the development of this field. Crazy....
OMG what a foolish mistake to put this woman back on the stand. Clearly she didn't follow normal procedures for any of her diagnosis of AH and just "diagnosed" her with PTSD because that's what she was paid to do. She keeps refusing to answer any question without first going into some diatribe about how "her" way is the standardized way despite the directions for these exams clearly in her face saying otherwise. Dr. Curry puts this woman to shame.
Exactly. It's ridiculous that she gave AH a potential candidate to feign or malinger a list of symptoms of PTSD and just asking her now rate the degree of intensity and frequency. (That's almost like assuming she had PTSD beforehand)
As someone with a psychology degree- this woman completely violated the proper procedures for administering these tests. These tests have set time limits (within the past year, within the past month, etc.) in order to correct and eliminate as much bias as possible. There is NO way to 'adjust' a test for a patient. This shows that there is bias and the potential for memory fabrication, making ALL of her findings void. I wouldn't be surprised if her board certification is revoked. This is an embarrassment to all individuals who perform in the psychological field. She violated the most important and common problem found in psychology- accounting for bias and the prevention of it altering true and credible results. Personally, I hope her licensing is removed, for the sake of the profession as a whole. Fools like this are the reason our profession is a laughing stock.
As a psychology student, let me poke you a bit: is there some research that indicates memory fabrication increases as the timespan of the incident moves from 12 months ago, to 48 months ago? I.e. couldn't fabrication occur at equal amounts in both time frames? And if the tests have to be timed in order to be valid, how can a psychologist make a reliable determination after that time limit? Are there no techniques or guidelines for these scenarios?
@@bernlin2000 Oh, great question! From what I learned, each time (I mean EACH TIME) you recall a memory, there is a chance for memory fabrication. This is why stories that are told from years ago should be taken with a grain of salt; if the brain attempts to recreate the event that occurred, there is a likely chance that something will be missed (or omitted), or likely exaggerated. Memory fabrication can occur at any given time; as a psychologist, our goals are to collect data with the least amount of bias and fabrication. Therefore, our tests are set at specific time increments to BEST eliminate these potentials. Of course, each time someone has to recall an event, we (with a grain of salt) attempt to believe our clients. For example: if I were to tell someone how my day went yesterday, I might hit the highlights, but omit the factor that I went to the store. Not that 'going to the store' was an important factor, but it shows how the brain can easily forget or twist information when its pulled back from memory. Sorry for the lecture paragraph, but hope this helps! Feel free to poke me anytime, lol
Applause to Wayne Dennison. Brilliant lawyer JD got in his team. His crossed examination have indeed shaken all of Amber's witnesses. He brought out their true colours in their field of study.
She's been asked to testify by Depp's side as it is now their chance to take everything she said before apart - she is not there out of her own free will.
She’s claiming that most incorrectly administer these tests, completely against the manual and yet, Dr. Curry explained how exactly and when to give the tests to patients. This doctor is confrontational and looks to be insulted because she gave tests past the one year mark. So she’s been diagnosing people incorrectly and making them believe they could have something they don’t. In the case of Amber, she’s looking for anything she can so she has excuse after excuse to do whatever she wants.
Exactly especially as the years go by you experience other relationships etc. How can she just attribute these “claims” to JD ? What about past childhood trauma or past relationship experiences & trauma was any of this addressed.
What I learnt in this whole trial: • Judge Penney is a reminder that no matter what the situation is, patience is helpful • Uncle Ben's facial expressions are actual representations of me when I hear someone supports Amber. 😳 • Johnny hates Mr Rottenborn - he's not the only one • Elaine tried 👏🏻 • Amica cream - Still trying to find that one • Camille is a human version of a lie detector test • Johnny is very proud when Mr Rottenborn reads right ✔️ • Johnny signed 4 times ☝🏻 • Amber doesn't swell - move over Gal Gadot, new Wonder woman in town • We need a psychiatrist after watching Dr Spiegal - remember, the psychiatrist 🥴 • Dr Curry is goals • "Mega PINT" is my new favorite term when referring to a need for coffee 🍷☕️ • Objection, Hearsay, Speculation are words that hold the MOST power. • Amber Heard is the only person to cry without tears and will get rid of the invisible tears by wiping the forehead And last but not least.... • Amber wrote the Op-Ed. That was an oops moment though 🤫 dont tell anyone. -Copy and paste from FB
Heard waited until all her divorce settlement money installments were paid and then wrote her Op-ed as one final knife in Depp's back, which, backfired on her spectacularly...lmfao! And don't forget how Heard says everyone is lying under Oath in a Court of Law on the witness stand, up to and including the Police. You can't make this stuff up...W○W!
@@Ponce17 Those were the actual documents, not filled in correctly. If you look at the very bottom of the boxes you can see her score is circled, but, without the check boxes we have no idea how she reached that score. The next doctor to read those documents will only see the final circled score and have no idea how she arrived there. That's not medicine.
Dr. Curry made a perfect point. These evaluations were not just to diagnose Amber to figure out what help she needs. It’s for a court case, where Amber would be compelled to lie or manipulate the results.
@@lo_hi I know the juror interviewed said they didn’t factor in any of the experts and only followed the evidence. But you gotta believe that Curry planted a ton of seeds in their minds the way she accurately predicted how Amber would react on the stand.
You made me laugh. I would make this comparison in a slightly different way. Attack dogs, yes. Amber's dogs appear to have rabies and follow no logical course, sometimes even chasing their own tail. Mr. Dennison is the german shepherd that will go after someone's throat to protect his family.
one of the BEST lines in this trial... "You said that we need to read the manual. Would you also agree with me, that we need to read the directions?" Dr. Hughes got BUSTED!!
What’s weird is the “expert” arguing when being asked question. That, to me, shows guilt when you know you nothing about what you’re doing or you know you’re caught in your lies. AH smirking while her own supposed “expert” is being grilled is even stranger to me…..
Narcissists tend to lack social awareness and tend to perceive situations as how they would like them to play out as opposed to how they actually are playing out. So it's quite possible she thinks this psychologist is providing sound arguments as to why AH is right. Which would explain her smirking 😏
Because she believe she is winning right now. She is so delusional and out of this world she thinks that we believe her because she is a weak, scarred, vulnerable princess when the fact is majority of people are capable of thinking logically and connect the dots of evidence to gain conclusion of what is happening and who is telling the truth.
Kinky what's even stranger is you wanting what is wrong. Look at Depp, you find him smirking through out the proceedings cute ? The man was not sober for most part of his time with Amber. That has been established. Living with an addict is traumatic. He dumped all the sweet women in his life. He's a woman user and abuser.
My psychologist would be cringing right about now, to think someone in his field would try to get away with the incompetence, and reflect on all other psychologists like this.
I have so much respect for this lawyer, he understood everything, even though I believe he got the most difficult parts to understand in the trial, in my opinion. All the psychiatrist, and photo megawhatevers! RESPECT! ♥️♥️♥️
They weren't difficult for him. There would have been days of preparation with his own expert witnesses, not only on their individual specialties, but on whether there was any strategy adopted by the opposition in how all their experts presented. Clearly there wasn't. But the appalling quality of Heard's experts does suggest that her legal team were hard pressed to find sufficiently impressive exerts. Personally I wouldn't have taken Heard's case for any fee, so shallow were her grounds.
Why would she give her assessments if it were over a year?! I’m a therapist and would never. You don’t give that assessment. Move on! She should be investigated. 🤦🏾♀️
I don't get it tho. Its a test for ptsd diagnosis, but its void, because the supposed event lies back more than a year? So you cant diagnose PTSD for events more than a year in the past? That doesn't make sense to me.
"It would be redundant" You're a forensic psychologist! You don't just get lazy with documents because it's convenient for you! Everyone makes redundant documents in any field for consistency!
Redundancy prevents data loss. I'm a lowly truck driver and I use MULTIPLE copies of the exact same: bills of lading, payment receipts, invoices, "truck" receipts. My wife is a lawyer and, Jesus Christ, talk about paperwork....
No, she means, quite literally, the entire 88 page analysis would be attached to this diagnostic. Clearly, that box is not going to contain 88 pages of material, nor could you expect a psychologist to condense that much material down to a single box on a single page. People (and the lawyer) are nagging on a non-issue, with the sole aim to portray the psychologist as "sloppy" or unprofessional.
Looking at this psychologist, a supposedly "expert", it scares me to death to think what would happen behind closed doors, in other cases where other similar fake experts ruin people's lives. It's insane.
Amber says she never smirked in her testimony while she was acting out scene to the jury of a traumatized victim, yet here’s another example of clear smirking.
Yes honestly she surely is delusional to think nobody is seeing this. Either that or she's so narcasistic she believes she can do as she pleases as every other person is below her and thick !!
Wayne Dennison to me was the best attorney on Depps team. In order to effectively cross examine these ‘expert witnesses’ required way more detailed crosses that involved finding fallacies in individuals who are considered experts in their field. Something that is incredibly hard to do since this is what they do for a living so swaying a jury and proving them wrong involves very careful questioning. Camille has a much easier cross because Amber is not as educated and her lies were easier to expose.
camille did quite good on cross with that finger doctor guy, but i agree, dennison did quite well, psychologists are far more difficult to cross examine and yet dennison made it so easy
They’re on the same team. Don’t pit Dennison and Camille against each other because outsiders complement one or the other. Each had amazing roles in an serious challenge!
I’d you’re used to how smart people typically disingenuously push their point, it’s not that hard. This isn’t to downplay Dennison as he also has to break things apart according to legal boundaries and make the critique contextually sensible to a jury.
Dr. Karen is an utter disgrace to her profession. The APA needs to investigate her methods, all of the people she has treated and revoke her license. What a joke.
Most of her witnesses seem to get irritated easily, probably because Depp’s team sees through their lies so easily and know how to question them. Her witnesses have all come across so unprofessional, aggressive, and rude, I hope the jury has noticed the stark differences between the testimonies from each side.
Literally reading the manual and directions and showing that she didn’t follow them is so simple yet powerful. Not sure what else needs to be said on this. Absolutely DEVASTATING cross examination
Are the Lawyers, Judges exactly follow what is written on the rule books. Don't the create and use Principles, doctorines as and when required to give a different meaning to the rules. An expert is expected to apply his mind in their diagnosis.C But to decide about AH nothing is required. It is just apparent.. A kid will tell it who she is!
@@cubencis exactly.. But both need cognitive analysis, application of techniques and interpretation of the results. So, an expert cannot always be expected to adhere to the rule book blindly. They have to apply their skill and knowledge to arrive at their opinion. For example the reference to 'Past year' ..need not be taken as to The immediately preceding previous year of 365 days. I felt a little bit of arrogance in the argument between Psycologist and the Advocate. Both were sticking to the idea that their Stand is absolutely correct.
@@rajkann1971 Dr. Hughs decided she could make up her own time frame. I think that invalidates her use of the tool. Suppose something has happened to Amber during the time period the test is intended to measure but the doctor has already decided she will twist what ever answers she gets to fit the time period she wants? Two, three, even four years ago. The manual seems pretty clear that is not the way the test should be used.
A comment above yours gives the reason (having to do with bias) why the 365imit is in fact required. That comment was from a psychology student. You are mistaken.
Camille is popular because she exposed amber’s lies. However this lawyer was always chosen to grill those experts because his skill, experience and knowledge
You absolutely cannot make your own rules when administering these tests. If the test doesn't apply to the situation, you have to use a different, more relevant assessment tool. I hope she gets disciplined by the licensing board. This is ridiculous.
@@ddozstudio4295 I just looked her up (after seeing your comment) and she shows as licensed on the ABPP website, but her name didn't come up at all when I searched the NY licensing lookup for psychologists. Weird.
Saying I didn’t put info on the form cause it’s in my notes would be like me handing in a blank test at school and saying the answers are in my binder lol
A quick google of Wayne Dennison will reveal he was named one of 2022 best lawyers of the year. He is a partner at Brown Rudnick. His cross of the 2 expert medical witnesses was deadly. He's excellent. All of Mr Depp's team were excellent.
I have never seen a psychologist be so hostile, emotional and rude. They are cerebral, uninvolved and logical. She exudes way too much emotion to be professional, balanced or logical. Almost a actor pretending to be a psychologist.
@@hello15848 I've encountered some psychologists both at school and in my line of work that have been hostile and rude. They might be "cerebral, uninvolved, and logical" in certain settings, but they're certainly not like that in all situations.
@@NP-zs5ui you don’t think a psychologist should be cerebral, uninvolved and logical in a court setting? Dr Hughes behaved completely inappropriately and if I were a patient of hers I would be rethinking and trying to find someone else
I have no clue about all of this technical stuff but the way this ‘expert’ witness is so defensive tells me a lot. If you’re confident about your work you don’t feel the urge to get argumentative. On a side note, this lawyer is top class. I mean, all of Johnny’s lawyers are but he’s so professional and polite
I think it is seriously messed up how easy it us for us to label a man as a abuser, but it's still not socially acceptable to point out that there are manipulative women like Amber Heard...
Actually in the context of divorce with children a lot of men with personality disorders similar to AH’s get away with false claims that their STBX or ex is abusive or incompetent . Very common especially with stay at home moms who don’t have their own money to fight back and who often unilaterally tasked with the care of the children in spite of the father’s alleged concerns. It is actually a huge problem with the US family courts.
@@douglasjessop I don't know if I would say that. I honestly don't have any idea what the ratio would be, but manipulative women like Heard are common enough for sure...
@@dijonjohn1011 still 62 percent being false allegations from regarding domestic violence is an even lower number bc men virtually don't ever and i mean ever report domestic violence. Typically in the cases where the man ends up dead are when those signs appear.
Funny how Amber heard said johnny made a campaign against her...I believe that alot of people sided with johnny because there is alot of proof she is lying and she's vile not because they are his fans or he rallied them to support him..and it also disturbs me that she also drags her baby into this,she said people threatened to throw her baby into an oven,what?..most people are feeling sorry for the baby and not the other way around as she claims.
I think her claiming there as a campaign against her was the last thing she could think of when it was clear that her and her witnesses had no adequate evidence. She sees Johnny’s witnesses defending him so well (probably because they’re telling the truth and respect him) and just decides they’ve been paid and set up to speak badly about her 🙄 I hope it’s been crystal clear to the jury what kind of monster this woman is and what a fool she’s made of herself.
Besides she brought this whole thing on herself! She ruined his reputation on purpose for gain and now her evil plan is backfiring so now she's crying! Please 🙄
This was related to Whitney saying on the stand allegedly johnny saying one time putting one of their dog in oven . I think Amber exaggerates things and uses words to her benefit like twisting them just like the comment about kate moss during her testimony. I have seen her do that. She copies people. She copies words of others and twist to her story to be made Believable..
This person is as bad as Amber. Her condescending attitude. She thinks she's Superior to all others as she states that herself. Hard to listen and I hope the jury can see through her fake pride about herself. Is very belligerent to answer the lawyers questions. She goes on and on and on about her Superior knowledge. Yuck yuck yuck. Evil people all around.
That was humiliating for her. Just read the manual Dr Curry and she didn't even follow any of the instructions and did it her way. 🤦🏾♀️ I am done with Dr Karen Hughes
They did quite decent at crossing tho. Especially spotting the weakness of Mr baina, they noticed the expert didn't include the Likes and shares. That's what lawyers do, finding a crack or a chink of the armor.
She’s embarrassing. In a clinical setting you do things a bit differently than in a forensic setting. She should’ve crossed her Ts and dotted her Is with actual assessments required. Ugh
even in a clinical setting you have to follow the instructions or you can't use it for diagnosis. i work in clinical trials and if we found out that sites were using validated questionnaires incorrectly, we'd have to scrap all their data
@@sallycooper7677 I understand how it SHOULD be done in a clinical setting, which for the record I mean clinical in the confines of a private practice, not in any sort of clinical trial. When you’re doing it for your own records people don’t always do all of the steps, some don’t do a proper assessment at all. If she knew she was bringing it to court she needed to actually do it by the book not how she does it in her office. That was the point of my comment.
I think Psychologists who take pride in their work and what they represent as actual professionals in their field should come forward and express their thoughts on this case because this woman is a slap in the face to the profession.
This lawyer is so calm and he moves smoothly from one q to the other till she finds a question that she only have to answer honestly or she’ll get exposed
This entire team of attorneys were amazing to watch. Wayne Dennison, Ben Chew and Camille Vasquez all played their part perfectly. Wayne was brilliant at uncovering the bias and inconsistencies of the defences apparent experts
Camille was a precision strike at the heart of the trial. But Wayne was a carpet bomb on the whole opposing experts. Great coordination from the whole team.
That witness is boiling inside. She’s flustered and highly irritated. That’s why she drinking that water, lol . It’s like she’s thinking ‘how dare he question my skills/ expertise’ . She’s not likable and comes off hostile. Poor behavior as an expert witness/ psychologist.
It’s so funny that her psychologist and psychiatrist come across extremely poorly, this woman is so hostile and aggressive and her psychiatrist was straight up psychotic. Dr. Curry was outstanding, so professional, prepared, and clearly very well at what she does. Depp’s psychiatrist Richard Shaw was excellent too, he was calm, professional, very well educated, and presented himself flawlessly.
So basically she did not fill in the form the way it was meant to be filled out, just the way she wanted to in "other notes" or "other places"? Sounds just like Amber Heard to be honest, doing what suits them, not what is proper and professional...
Sometimes, experts use their expertise to manipulate people into thinking that whatever they are saying is correct by using extensive words, tone of their voice and expressions. Meanwhile, the ones with no such knowledge end up being manipulated. I hope that just because Dr. Curry and the metadata expert don’t hold certificates in their field their testimony doesn’t get misjudged. They did provide proof and valid statements.
lets not get misled. This woman is, to my knowledge, board certified not only because she is OLDER so had more years to demonstrate that she meets "the established standards for the profession as maintained and protected by an organization that the field recognizes for that role" (which judging by her handling of this case I am skepticle of the propriety of this credential of Dr Hughes but that she WANTED TO. No body will force you to apply for it (as to my knowledge), heck, it is not even a REQUIREMENT to be a practicing forensic psychologist. The requirements of having an undergraduate degree, masters & a doctorate degree are fully satisfied by Dr Curry, hence the Dr title, so she DOES hold certificates. I am fairly sure that people have understood it. The only think which worries me as yourself is that just because the older lady is board certified (lets draw a loose comparison to Taylor Swift being awarded a Doctorate of fine arts) people might thing/ fear that Dr Hughes is right/ more right/ might be assessing better or more accurately the situation. Which is clearly not the case.
@@poseidon5989 I am hoping that it’s not the case too. There was another testimony by Dr. Spiegel which he gave by viewing Johnny’s movies/ interviews. His mannerisms and replies were quite hysterical. But, at the same time it makes one wonder their credibility. They may have been their best in the previous years.
Dr. Curry has a masters and doctorate degree. She’s also fully licensed to practice psychology. Board certified ONLY means you paid the board to evaluate you on a SPECIALTY that you want to ethically advertise. They’re basically there to say “yes you’ve gotten X amount of extra hours learning about couples so you can say you’re a couples specialist.” It’s not a requirement.
Thats a headshot, she diagnosed her with PTSD before giving CAPS5, a test PCL5 specifically mentioned and did not follow any standardised instructions.
Yea, it’s the ones that sneak up from beneath that are the most dangerous! And he’s one of those lawyers. That’s more scary than lawyers that immediately strike and go for offense, in my opinion.
OMG!!!! Wayne Dennison =The Terminator !!! He simply destroys the opposing team’s so-called “expert” witness..and It’s quite embarrassing….but I love it 😂😂😂
Im not surprised that Amber is a super big liar, what im shocked on is all " specialist and expects " lying under oath come to court and LIE and destroy their own careers over a lying woman. UNBELIEVABLE like why? SAVE YOURSELVES.
I don’t think you’re supposed to back-diagnose. The idea is if she has the diagnosis now. We don’t say you had pneumonia ten years ago so you must have it now.
She might win the case tho. She threw a tantrum in front of the jury, crying and saying people are sending death threats and threatening to microwave her baby.
And then has the cheek to state (whilst fake crying) that she isn't sat there laughing, looking smug etc etc ... Yet she's doing it whilst this incompetent woman is on the stand.
@@pamelasheridan2178 I really had a good laugh when Dr Curry explained one of the tests is used to detect malignering, in which she scored really way to high. I just pictured Amber ticking away blissfully unaware she was being tested for lying 🤦🏼♀️😄
this woman needs to have her license revoked. im working on my psychology degree and it is common knowledge that you cannot administer these kinds of assessments like that. shes practically implying the instructions are just there for no reason. thered obviously reasons why they must be administered in certain ways to prevent bias and misinterpretations. she is a threat to her clients well being and treatment. this is how people get misdiagnosed and treated for something they dont have. that wastes peoples money and time and leaves them suffering longer. absolutely shameful to this practice.
Can we take a moment to appreciate this lawyer's work ? This guy destroyed almost every expert he faced. People only talk about Camille but this man is excellent.
Agreed 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
I was not sure about him, but he has delivered every time.
💯💯💯
True 👍
He's more low key then sneaks in for kill
I don't see ANYBODY giving Wayne Dennison his respect. He has literally refuted all the big hitters of Amber and dismantled them thoroughly. Aside from camille, Wayne has literally been one of the biggest integral parts of this trial.
💯 those two are the superstar attorneys of this trial, but the proof will be in the end result. We'll soon see if the jury is actually capable of recognizing their brilliance, and see through the vile nature behind the defense tactics. Defamation is exceedingly difficult to prove, and has ramifications for how the first amendment is interpreted. That isn't to say that I don't believe that it JD should win, or that AH needs to go back to the trailer park she grew up in and live out the rest of her days in reclusive squalor, I just have little to no faith in the jury
@@Sharon... Lol, okay fine, perhaps I'm guilty of attributing too much anthropomorphism to the maggot. Perhaps she should crawl back into the cesspool that spawned her. Better?
I love Wayne, from the start - his manner, his tactics and as you mentioned, his cross-examinations were critical to this case. It was beautiful when he cross-examined the metadata forensic 'expert' yesterday and showed him the two photos as being created at exactly the same time, with an app that does 'sorting' and 'EDITING'..!
I love Wayne, i've been saying this for a while
I love Wayne so much. he is the man to. cross examine. the expert witnesses. he's a man of wisdom. and I like his voice.
The fact that she gets irritated just being asked by those questions and not directly answering them, says it all
so true.
What does it say, since you seem to be the psychologist now?
She’s way too defensive
@also, maybe there nothing but liars like her
All Ambers so-called professionals are getting frustrated, they are all realizing they have been lied to by Amber
and they're all stuck in her lie.
All jokes aside this is actually very scary. A doctor knowingly ignoring standard ethical practice, wow 😯
Like someone has already said somewhere down here in the comment section, she did that on purpose, this test was for the court not for the patient, basically she did what she was paid for.
@@someoneyouknow5040 Bingo. She’s a hired gun that’s worked for Elaine’s firm many times. She’s brought in to say “she’s the victim, he’s the abuser”.
It's Bad, Dr Hughes seems Gullible & Uneducated...She Also is Rude& Talks on top of the Lawyer, She's Very Irresponsible & has a Bad Demenior..It Would Not Surprise me if she got Paid to Lie??
When I see this stuff, I feel like the medical communities need to widen their net on maintaining credibility. Work like this should result in malpractice hearings, with the potential of being publicly and officially discredited by your peers if you're demonstrated to knowingly violate ethical practices
It absolutely absurd !
This lawyer doesn't get enough credit. He's done an incredible job in this trial, especially because his whole approach is a rather bumbling Colombo style delivery. Yet he hits the mark every time, makes his point every time, and always leaves the questioning on a high point for the defence. The best example being when he was talking about the 'Justice for Johnny Depp' hashtag (which he kept repeating - deliberately on purpose haha) and got the witness to agree that it wasn't offensive or detrimental to Ms. Heard. The witness said 'I'm a big fan of justice' and this guy says 'Me too. No further questions'. it was brilliant!
Its on purpose 😂 his bumbling approach makes people waffle to "prove " how smart they are... and then goes for the kill. He is absolutely brilliant
@@jacryan2004 spot on 👌
I thought he was odd when i first seen him. Hes more low key genius where camilee is more obvious. Hes more like the one low key worming is way in for the kill
This judge is excellent!! Real old school. A real gentleman =)
That's what I'm saying!! I think he became my favorite lawyer because of how witty he is and his "mic drop" moments.
She is an expert but can't follow standard procedures. Lol
Kudos to this lawyer btw. 👏
She chose not to because she wanted to skew the results to her liking
You nailed it 👍👍
Yup, blatantly implying that her experience outweighs procedures that are documented through the combined efforts of other experts throughout history of the development of this field. Crazy....
It does really a surprise coming from Heard’s legal team corps of “expert witnesses”?! Haha.
At least her acting didn't mess up her makeup. 😂
OMG what a foolish mistake to put this woman back on the stand. Clearly she didn't follow normal procedures for any of her diagnosis of AH and just "diagnosed" her with PTSD because that's what she was paid to do. She keeps refusing to answer any question without first going into some diatribe about how "her" way is the standardized way despite the directions for these exams clearly in her face saying otherwise. Dr. Curry puts this woman to shame.
Exactly. It's ridiculous that she gave AH a potential candidate to feign or malinger a list of symptoms of PTSD and just asking her now rate the degree of intensity and frequency. (That's almost like assuming she had PTSD beforehand)
For someone who is board certified.. this is bad for her credentials. I prefer Doctor Curry
Wasnt a choice once she’s appeared to defend amber she can get questioned by depps lot
@also, maybe more experience doesn’t mean more qualified.
Well said 👏
As someone with a psychology degree- this woman completely violated the proper procedures for administering these tests. These tests have set time limits (within the past year, within the past month, etc.) in order to correct and eliminate as much bias as possible. There is NO way to 'adjust' a test for a patient. This shows that there is bias and the potential for memory fabrication, making ALL of her findings void. I wouldn't be surprised if her board certification is revoked. This is an embarrassment to all individuals who perform in the psychological field. She violated the most important and common problem found in psychology- accounting for bias and the prevention of it altering true and credible results. Personally, I hope her licensing is removed, for the sake of the profession as a whole. Fools like this are the reason our profession is a laughing stock.
EXACTLY
🙏 Thank you. As someone who is diagnosed with some things, the trust you place in your psychologist is paramount.
And not once does it say “this can be administered RETROSPECTIVELY”
As a psychology student, let me poke you a bit: is there some research that indicates memory fabrication increases as the timespan of the incident moves from 12 months ago, to 48 months ago? I.e. couldn't fabrication occur at equal amounts in both time frames?
And if the tests have to be timed in order to be valid, how can a psychologist make a reliable determination after that time limit? Are there no techniques or guidelines for these scenarios?
@@bernlin2000 Oh, great question! From what I learned, each time (I mean EACH TIME) you recall a memory, there is a chance for memory fabrication. This is why stories that are told from years ago should be taken with a grain of salt; if the brain attempts to recreate the event that occurred, there is a likely chance that something will be missed (or omitted), or likely exaggerated. Memory fabrication can occur at any given time; as a psychologist, our goals are to collect data with the least amount of bias and fabrication. Therefore, our tests are set at specific time increments to BEST eliminate these potentials. Of course, each time someone has to recall an event, we (with a grain of salt) attempt to believe our clients. For example: if I were to tell someone how my day went yesterday, I might hit the highlights, but omit the factor that I went to the store. Not that 'going to the store' was an important factor, but it shows how the brain can easily forget or twist information when its pulled back from memory. Sorry for the lecture paragraph, but hope this helps! Feel free to poke me anytime, lol
Applause to Wayne Dennison. Brilliant lawyer JD got in his team. His crossed examination have indeed shaken all of Amber's witnesses. He brought out their true colours in their field of study.
Yes! He is the secret weapon... sounding confused and bumbling.. and then NAILING everything!! Jujitsu!!
Dr. Hughes’ testimony totally destroyed her career. Don’t think she’s going to get anymore paid testimonials after this. She helped Amber lose.
Bravo to the entire team, well oiled machine of truth finders.
@@valerieg369 agreed ! She’s just as cocky and unlikable as AH. She’s clearly bias too.
Wayne Dennison, a hero in destroying all the expert with their wrong diagnosis. Not only He is genius, he is also very patient
„It‘s okay your Honor, we can do it the slow way.“
She’s very argumentative and very unprofessional. She is NOTHING like Dr. Shannon Curry who follows procedure and is very professional.
Because she has been put to testimony which she doesn't want to come out as a bad psycholgist
Right
I 💯% agree with you there. A know it all or so she thinks!
@@anurag1893 it still makes her look a bit ridiculous not directly answering half the questions asked
@@anurag1893 She is an actual Quack who gives diagnoses that are convenient for money
I can not BELIEVE they put this woman back on the stand?
Heard's team must love pain
She's been asked to testify by Depp's side as it is now their chance to take everything she said before apart - she is not there out of her own free will.
They seem to be as dillsional as AH is.
They have to i think
They don't seem to have any other choices.
the audacity to resurface after being proved to be incredibly unprofessional in front of everyone
She’s claiming that most incorrectly administer these tests, completely against the manual and yet, Dr. Curry explained how exactly and when to give the tests to patients. This doctor is confrontational and looks to be insulted because she gave tests past the one year mark. So she’s been diagnosing people incorrectly and making them believe they could have something they don’t. In the case of Amber, she’s looking for anything she can so she has excuse after excuse to do whatever she wants.
💯 straws
Yes she has the perma b**** grin face going or maybe the poker b**** face too that could be combination of both LOL
Absolutely right! Her nastiness comes from being exposed and now the world knows just how incompetent she is.
I wonder how much money Amber payed her for this
Exactly especially as the years go by you experience other relationships etc. How can she just attribute these “claims” to JD ?
What about past childhood trauma or past relationship experiences & trauma was any of this addressed.
What I learnt in this whole trial:
• Judge Penney is a reminder that no matter what the situation is, patience is helpful
• Uncle Ben's facial expressions are actual representations of me when I hear someone supports Amber. 😳
• Johnny hates Mr Rottenborn - he's not the only one
• Elaine tried 👏🏻
• Amica cream - Still trying to find that one
• Camille is a human version of a lie detector test
• Johnny is very proud when Mr Rottenborn reads right ✔️
• Johnny signed 4 times ☝🏻
• Amber doesn't swell - move over Gal Gadot, new Wonder woman in town
• We need a psychiatrist after watching Dr Spiegal - remember, the psychiatrist 🥴
• Dr Curry is goals
• "Mega PINT" is my new favorite term when referring to a need for coffee 🍷☕️
• Objection, Hearsay, Speculation are words that hold the MOST power.
• Amber Heard is the only person to cry without tears and will get rid of the invisible tears by wiping the forehead
And last but not least....
• Amber wrote the Op-Ed. That was an oops moment though 🤫 dont tell anyone.
-Copy and paste from FB
That’s really funny, I like it and I like it the fact you mentioned the source
Heard waited until all her divorce settlement money installments were paid and then wrote her Op-ed as one final knife in Depp's back, which, backfired on her spectacularly...lmfao!
And don't forget how Heard says everyone is lying under Oath in a Court of Law on the witness stand, up to and including the Police.
You can't make this stuff up...W○W!
This is brilliant 😂😂
😂😂🤪
Brilliant 🤣🤣🤣
It's awesome to watch mr. Dennison work. How he corners her, very slowly, and all she can do is get angry. That's pure art.
I wonder how many people she’s misdiagnosed and put on medication that’s irrelevant to their condition. Another arrogant witness on AH’s side.
She can’t prescribe meds thankfully.
@River Thank you for the correction! 👍
Amber and her whole legal team are arrogant....birds of a feather always flock together
@@river8760 but she can testify in court for DV cases and probably sent many innocent men to jail...
Possible none. Her services is a court "expert". She probably is affordable too but not competent.
She didn't fill out the blanks because she doesn't want to get busted for falsifying documents
She did fill it in, they are just showing what the blank document looks like
Facts
@@Ponce17 The lawyer and she herself literally say she didn't fill in the blanks
@@Ponce17
Those were the actual documents, not filled in correctly. If you look at the very bottom of the boxes you can see her score is circled, but, without the check boxes we have no idea how she reached that score. The next doctor to read those documents will only see the final circled score and have no idea how she arrived there. That's not medicine.
"it was a collaborative effort" = she got some grunt to enter the data
Dr. Curry made a perfect point.
These evaluations were not just to diagnose Amber to figure out what help she needs. It’s for a court case, where Amber would be compelled to lie or manipulate the results.
Dr Curry has been on point with EVERYTHING!!
@@lo_hi I know the juror interviewed said they didn’t factor in any of the experts and only followed the evidence. But you gotta believe that Curry planted a ton of seeds in their minds the way she accurately predicted how Amber would react on the stand.
@@Skkyyyyyyyyyyy yea…agreed
Mr. Dennison is their “attack dog”. Unlike the “attack dogs” of the defendant’s side; Mr. Dennison has class, style and appeal.
You made me laugh. I would make this comparison in a slightly different way. Attack dogs, yes. Amber's dogs appear to have rabies and follow no logical course, sometimes even chasing their own tail. Mr. Dennison is the german shepherd that will go after someone's throat to protect his family.
@@madganser 🤣🤣
Rottenborne was annoying. Dennison is straight up proving the times she didn't follow the instructions.
@madganser Amber's team doesn't communicate with each other or seem to work together.
one of the BEST lines in this trial... "You said that we need to read the manual. Would you also agree with me, that we need to read the directions?" Dr. Hughes got BUSTED!!
Link plz
What’s weird is the “expert” arguing when being asked question. That, to me, shows guilt when you know you nothing about what you’re doing or you know you’re caught in your lies. AH smirking while her own supposed “expert” is being grilled is even stranger to me…..
Right??? Like why does she think this is possibly In her favor rn…
Narcissists tend to lack social awareness and tend to perceive situations as how they would like them to play out as opposed to how they actually are playing out. So it's quite possible she thinks this psychologist is providing sound arguments as to why AH is right. Which would explain her smirking 😏
Because she believe she is winning right now. She is so delusional and out of this world she thinks that we believe her because she is a weak, scarred, vulnerable princess when the fact is majority of people are capable of thinking logically and connect the dots of evidence to gain conclusion of what is happening and who is telling the truth.
@@yasoru I was thinking the same thing especially how she(AH) just testified that she doesn’t “laugh, smirk or make side jokes.”
Kinky what's even stranger is you wanting what is wrong. Look at Depp, you find him smirking through out the proceedings cute ? The man was not sober for most part of his time with Amber. That has been established. Living with an addict is traumatic. He dumped all the sweet women in his life. He's a woman user and abuser.
Dr. Hughes to Jury: just read the manual.
Dennison: let’s read the manual
Dr Hughes face:🤡
dennison with his receipts 😂 we can only stan
If only Dennison went God Mode like Camille
👁👄👁 lol
Teacher : Did you do your homework?
Dr. Hugues : Yes
Teacher : Lets me see them
Dr. Hugues : .............. a bird stole my paper...
@@Camuska 😂😂😂😭😭-
My psychologist would be cringing right about now, to think someone in his field would try to get away with the incompetence, and reflect on all other psychologists like this.
I think its greed and not incompetence.
Everyone competent in this field is going to be disturbed by this woman’s behaviour. She is a mess.
@@river8760 More like BLACKLIST her.
@@YYC403NOYP that too!
I’m wondering if the board will be notified because she’s not being ethical with her assessments under oath as well
I have so much respect for this lawyer, he understood everything, even though I believe he got the most difficult parts to understand in the trial, in my opinion. All the psychiatrist, and photo megawhatevers! RESPECT! ♥️♥️♥️
I agree. He really scrutinise the documents
They weren't difficult for him. There would have been days of preparation with his own expert witnesses, not only on their individual specialties, but on whether there was any strategy adopted by the opposition in how all their experts presented. Clearly there wasn't. But the appalling quality of Heard's experts does suggest that her legal team were hard pressed to find sufficiently impressive exerts. Personally I wouldn't have taken Heard's case for any fee, so shallow were her grounds.
Why would she give her assessments if it were over a year?! I’m a therapist and would never. You don’t give that assessment. Move on! She should be investigated. 🤦🏾♀️
Because she is a fool. The same with the first time, where she needed a break to read her notes, because she forgot them.
She should be investigated because she is unfit and dangerous.
Yes test are not reliable if not fresh in the mind.
I don't get it tho. Its a test for ptsd diagnosis, but its void, because the supposed event lies back more than a year? So you cant diagnose PTSD for events more than a year in the past? That doesn't make sense to me.
"It would be redundant"
You're a forensic psychologist! You don't just get lazy with documents because it's convenient for you! Everyone makes redundant documents in any field for consistency!
Redundancy prevents data loss. I'm a lowly truck driver and I use MULTIPLE copies of the exact same: bills of lading, payment receipts, invoices, "truck" receipts. My wife is a lawyer and, Jesus Christ, talk about paperwork....
yes, absolutely true. Being MD and medical expert I can only confirm that you are absolutely right 👌🏻
Superfluous redundancy.
IT'S $ $ $ MY DEAR !!!
No, she means, quite literally, the entire 88 page analysis would be attached to this diagnostic. Clearly, that box is not going to contain 88 pages of material, nor could you expect a psychologist to condense that much material down to a single box on a single page. People (and the lawyer) are nagging on a non-issue, with the sole aim to portray the psychologist as "sloppy" or unprofessional.
Looking at this psychologist, a supposedly "expert", it scares me to death to think what would happen behind closed doors, in other cases where other similar fake experts ruin people's lives. It's insane.
All of society is built on fakery. "Fake it till you make it" is basically Humanities bread and butter method of going about daily life.
She also trains others in how to give expert testimony. Whomp Whomp.
I’ve had it happen to me. Too many of these “Drs” around now.
Sadly lots of doctors are like her
I hope she's not a mother to boys.
Amber says she never smirked in her testimony while she was acting out scene to the jury of a traumatized victim, yet here’s another example of clear smirking.
Yes honestly she surely is delusional to think nobody is seeing this. Either that or she's so narcasistic she believes she can do as she pleases as every other person is below her and thick !!
Yes, smirking and looking so smug watching someone who tried to help her being humiliated like this.
Her smirking drives me nuts.
It's a sign of contempt.
So trapped in her head that reality is a foreign concept
Wayne Dennison to me was the best attorney on Depps team. In order to effectively cross examine these ‘expert witnesses’ required way more detailed crosses that involved finding fallacies in individuals who are considered experts in their field. Something that is incredibly hard to do since this is what they do for a living so swaying a jury and proving them wrong involves very careful questioning. Camille has a much easier cross because Amber is not as educated and her lies were easier to expose.
camille did quite good on cross with that finger doctor guy, but i agree, dennison did quite well, psychologists are far more difficult to cross examine and yet dennison made it so easy
Yeah I’m seeking his help FIRST if I ever need a lawyer.
They’re on the same team. Don’t pit Dennison and Camille against each other because outsiders complement one or the other. Each had amazing roles in an serious challenge!
I’d you’re used to how smart people typically disingenuously push their point, it’s not that hard. This isn’t to downplay Dennison as he also has to break things apart according to legal boundaries and make the critique contextually sensible to a jury.
All he had to do in this clip was get her to admit that the instructions repeatedly say within the past year.
Dr. Karen is an utter disgrace to her profession. The APA needs to investigate her methods, all of the people she has treated and revoke her license. What a joke.
This Dr. gets irritated easily. I don't want her to be my doctor, gosh terrifying.
Most of her witnesses seem to get irritated easily, probably because Depp’s team sees through their lies so easily and know how to question them. Her witnesses have all come across so unprofessional, aggressive, and rude, I hope the jury has noticed the stark differences between the testimonies from each side.
just look at her face, she looks so angry all the time!!!! Jeez
She looks like a typical man hater
She's an arrogant quack
@@creamerasant she and every other witness that her team put at the witness stand
Literally reading the manual and directions and showing that she didn’t follow them is so simple yet powerful. Not sure what else needs to be said on this. Absolutely DEVASTATING cross examination
Are the Lawyers, Judges exactly follow what is written on the rule books. Don't the create and use Principles, doctorines as and when required to give a different meaning to the rules. An expert is expected to apply his mind in their diagnosis.C
But to decide about AH nothing is required. It is just apparent.. A kid will tell it who she is!
@@rajkann1971 law and psychology are completely different.. hard to understand what you’re trying to say in your first part
@@cubencis exactly.. But both need cognitive analysis, application of techniques and interpretation of the results. So, an expert cannot always be expected to adhere to the rule book blindly. They have to apply their skill and knowledge to arrive at their opinion.
For example the reference to 'Past year' ..need not be taken as to The immediately preceding previous year of 365 days. I felt a little bit of arrogance in the argument between Psycologist and the Advocate. Both were sticking to the idea that their Stand is absolutely correct.
@@rajkann1971 Dr. Hughs decided she could make up her own time frame. I think that invalidates her use of the tool. Suppose something has happened to Amber during the time period the test is intended to measure but the doctor has already decided she will twist what ever answers she gets to fit the time period she wants? Two, three, even four years ago. The manual seems pretty clear that is not the way the test should be used.
A comment above yours gives the reason (having to do with bias) why the 365imit is in fact required. That comment was from a psychology student. You are mistaken.
I love hearing this lawyer question, slowly, gently, calming and bam attack! The hidden warlord.
Camille is popular because she exposed amber’s lies. However this lawyer was always chosen to grill those experts because his skill, experience and knowledge
You absolutely cannot make your own rules when administering these tests. If the test doesn't apply to the situation, you have to use a different, more relevant assessment tool. I hope she gets disciplined by the licensing board. This is ridiculous.
She’s not licensed.
@@ddozstudio4295 I just looked her up (after seeing your comment) and she shows as licensed on the ABPP website, but her name didn't come up at all when I searched the NY licensing lookup for psychologists. Weird.
This guy is like a Hammer of Justice.
Lol I know right!
“HAMMER OF JUSTICE” that’s a good analogy!! 👍🏼
If Bruce Wayne is Batman then Wayne Dennison has to be the Batman in the law field
Y'all see this woman?
This is what a fool caught in their own lies looks like.
Haha
Saying I didn’t put info on the form cause it’s in my notes would be like me handing in a blank test at school and saying the answers are in my binder lol
Or in my head 😂
Perfect analogy!
You hit it right on the money!!!
You hit it right on the money!!!
A quick google of Wayne Dennison will reveal he was named one of 2022 best lawyers of the year. He is a partner at Brown Rudnick. His cross of the 2 expert medical witnesses was deadly. He's excellent. All of Mr Depp's team were excellent.
I have never seen a psychologist be so hostile, emotional and rude. They are cerebral, uninvolved and logical. She exudes way too much emotion to be professional, balanced or logical. Almost a actor pretending to be a psychologist.
Psychologist have the same personalities as the rest of the general population.
@@NP-zs5ui they are trained in professional behavior. They are not supposed to show emotion . I am in the field.
@@hello15848 I've encountered some psychologists both at school and in my line of work that have been hostile and rude. They might be "cerebral, uninvolved, and logical" in certain settings, but they're certainly not like that in all situations.
@@NP-zs5ui um in their professional role they are trained to be one way. Outside of their profession they will behave differently.
@@NP-zs5ui you don’t think a psychologist should be cerebral, uninvolved and logical in a court setting? Dr Hughes behaved completely inappropriately and if I were a patient of hers I would be rethinking and trying to find someone else
I have no clue about all of this technical stuff but the way this ‘expert’ witness is so defensive tells me a lot. If you’re confident about your work you don’t feel the urge to get argumentative. On a side note, this lawyer is top class. I mean, all of Johnny’s lawyers are but he’s so professional and polite
I think it is seriously messed up how easy it us for us to label a man as a abuser, but it's still not socially acceptable to point out that there are manipulative women like Amber Heard...
💯
Id say it is just as if not more common to have manipulative women like Amber Heard than abusive men.
Actually in the context of divorce with children a lot of men with personality disorders similar to AH’s get away with false claims that their STBX or ex is abusive or incompetent . Very common especially with stay at home moms who don’t have their own money to fight back and who often unilaterally tasked with the care of the children in spite of the father’s alleged concerns. It is actually a huge problem with the US family courts.
@@douglasjessop
I don't know if I would say that. I honestly don't have any idea what the ratio would be, but manipulative women like Heard are common enough for sure...
@@dijonjohn1011 still 62 percent being false allegations from regarding domestic violence is an even lower number bc men virtually don't ever and i mean ever report domestic violence. Typically in the cases where the man ends up dead are when those signs appear.
Funny how Amber heard said johnny made a campaign against her...I believe that alot of people sided with johnny because there is alot of proof she is lying and she's vile not because they are his fans or he rallied them to support him..and it also disturbs me that she also drags her baby into this,she said people threatened to throw her baby into an oven,what?..most people are feeling sorry for the baby and not the other way around as she claims.
Exactly
I think her claiming there as a campaign against her was the last thing she could think of when it was clear that her and her witnesses had no adequate evidence. She sees Johnny’s witnesses defending him so well (probably because they’re telling the truth and respect him) and just decides they’ve been paid and set up to speak badly about her 🙄 I hope it’s been crystal clear to the jury what kind of monster this woman is and what a fool she’s made of herself.
Besides she brought this whole thing on herself! She ruined his reputation on purpose for gain and now her evil plan is backfiring so now she's crying! Please 🙄
Mommy dearest .
This was related to Whitney saying on the stand allegedly johnny saying one time putting one of their dog in oven . I think Amber exaggerates things and uses words to her benefit like twisting them just like the comment about kate moss during her testimony. I have seen her do that. She copies people. She copies words of others and twist to her story to be made Believable..
Wayne Dennison is a legend, he took down all Amber's experts, he dismantled them methodically! Awesome lawyer!!!!!
It’s horrifying to think she trains prosecutors and law enforcement. So much anger in her face.
Hostile witness. Astonishingly unprofessional and biased. Her entire demeanor on the stand is disrespectful and embarrassing.
Yep, 100%
Absolutely awful, same as last time.
Why do all of ambers "expert witnesses" look like they were found in a trailer park?
Coz they were
hahahahaha
What pain are u talking about or u mean the pain she inflicted to Johnny 😂
LOL
Ah the american class system on display..lol
This person is as bad as Amber. Her condescending attitude. She thinks she's Superior to all others as she states that herself. Hard to listen and I hope the jury can see through her fake pride about herself. Is very belligerent to answer the lawyers questions. She goes on and on and on about her Superior knowledge. Yuck yuck yuck. Evil people all around.
AH got her people from outta the woodwork
Yes. Her and her movie booking "expert" with dark hair. All the same. Old mops..probably slept with her
She needs to be revoked of her medical license immediately. This lady does not deserve the title “Dr.”
She's a psychologist. She has a PhD, not an MD
@@avgchz9444 TH-cam's full of smart asses
@@avgchz9444 still doesn’t deserve to be called a dr. She completely lied in court
@@avgchz9444 you still sometimes call them doctors
@@beepboop4016 Yes, PhD stands for “doctor of philosophy” but it would be impossible to revoke her medical license because she doesn’t have one
That was humiliating for her. Just read the manual Dr Curry and she didn't even follow any of the instructions and did it her way. 🤦🏾♀️ I am done with Dr Karen Hughes
Stay hydrated Dr, you need tears when they question your license
😂
Amber heard legal team has not been able to bring decent witness. So far, epic fail.
Maybe decent witnesses for Amber Heard simply don't exist and therefore the lawyers can do nothing
cos the good ones are not a sell out
They did quite decent at crossing tho. Especially spotting the weakness of Mr baina, they noticed the expert didn't include the Likes and shares.
That's what lawyers do, finding a crack or a chink of the armor.
That's all she's got...lol
@@R1Neey123 so true
She’s embarrassing. In a clinical setting you do things a bit differently than in a forensic setting. She should’ve crossed her Ts and dotted her Is with actual assessments required. Ugh
even in a clinical setting you have to follow the instructions or you can't use it for diagnosis. i work in clinical trials and if we found out that sites were using validated questionnaires incorrectly, we'd have to scrap all their data
@@sallycooper7677 I understand how it SHOULD be done in a clinical setting, which for the record I mean clinical in the confines of a private practice, not in any sort of clinical trial. When you’re doing it for your own records people don’t always do all of the steps, some don’t do a proper assessment at all. If she knew she was bringing it to court she needed to actually do it by the book not how she does it in her office. That was the point of my comment.
Oh my gosh this lawyer is great 🤣 "would you also agree with me that you need to read the instructions?"
Kudos to the lawyer representing Mr. Depp! He is on point with his every argument!
Amber has her evil smirk smiles all over her face..she is just so irritating to see.
I think Psychologists who take pride in their work and what they represent as actual professionals in their field should come forward and express their thoughts on this case because this woman is a slap in the face to the profession.
My man Wayne what a legend…his language is simple but so affective …he got her flustered and angry it was magic….
This woman is a joke… even when Dr. Curry corrected an attorney or anything she did it with class. This woman is so argumentative!
This lawyer is so calm and he moves smoothly from one q to the other till she finds a question that she only have to answer honestly or she’ll get exposed
First time ever ,Johnny lawyers have strictly strike the witness. Amber & her lawyers are dying on their chairs with fake smile.
Imagine being a forensic psychologist and not being able to follow SIMPLE instructions
Malpractice written all over this woman. Imagine all the misdiagnoses she makes on a lot of her patients…
This entire team of attorneys were amazing to watch. Wayne Dennison, Ben Chew and Camille Vasquez all played their part perfectly. Wayne was brilliant at uncovering the bias and inconsistencies of the defences apparent experts
Camille was a precision strike at the heart of the trial. But Wayne was a carpet bomb on the whole opposing experts. Great coordination from the whole team.
That witness is boiling inside. She’s flustered and highly irritated. That’s why she drinking that water, lol . It’s like she’s thinking ‘how dare he question my skills/ expertise’ . She’s not likable and comes off hostile. Poor behavior as an expert witness/ psychologist.
Same as AH
I agree, she comes off very hostile
It’s so funny that her psychologist and psychiatrist come across extremely poorly, this woman is so hostile and aggressive and her psychiatrist was straight up psychotic. Dr. Curry was outstanding, so professional, prepared, and clearly very well at what she does. Depp’s psychiatrist Richard Shaw was excellent too, he was calm, professional, very well educated, and presented himself flawlessly.
She is a lot like AH, all of her "experts" are highly unprofessional and extremely unethical
The way she even drinks that water is annoying AF !
Johnny Depp's Lawyers: "How do you like the experts to be cook?"
Judge: "Well done"
In this case, burnt.
Extra crispy, and then put Amica cream on them.
😂😂
So basically she did not fill in the form the way it was meant to be filled out, just the way she wanted to in "other notes" or "other places"?
Sounds just like Amber Heard to be honest, doing what suits them, not what is proper and professional...
Wayne Dennison has entered, and boss music suddenly plays!
This lady needs to have her license reviewed if she diagnosed Amber with ptsd, all for defending a liar
Sometimes, experts use their expertise to manipulate people into thinking that whatever they are saying is correct by using extensive words, tone of their voice and expressions. Meanwhile, the ones with no such knowledge end up being manipulated. I hope that just because Dr. Curry and the metadata expert don’t hold certificates in their field their testimony doesn’t get misjudged. They did provide proof and valid statements.
lets not get misled. This woman is, to my knowledge, board certified not only because she is OLDER so had more years to demonstrate that she meets "the established standards for the profession as maintained and protected by an organization that the field recognizes for that role" (which judging by her handling of this case I am skepticle of the propriety of this credential of Dr Hughes but that she WANTED TO. No body will force you to apply for it (as to my knowledge), heck, it is not even a REQUIREMENT to be a practicing forensic psychologist.
The requirements of having an undergraduate degree, masters & a doctorate degree are fully satisfied by Dr Curry, hence the Dr title, so she DOES hold certificates. I am fairly sure that people have understood it. The only think which worries me as yourself is that just because the older lady is board certified (lets draw a loose comparison to Taylor Swift being awarded a Doctorate of fine arts) people might thing/ fear that Dr Hughes is right/ more right/ might be assessing better or more accurately the situation. Which is clearly not the case.
@@poseidon5989 I am hoping that it’s not the case too. There was another testimony by Dr. Spiegel which he gave by viewing Johnny’s movies/ interviews. His mannerisms and replies were quite hysterical. But, at the same time it makes one wonder their credibility. They may have been their best in the previous years.
True that
Dr. Curry has a masters and doctorate degree. She’s also fully licensed to practice psychology. Board certified ONLY means you paid the board to evaluate you on a SPECIALTY that you want to ethically advertise. They’re basically there to say “yes you’ve gotten X amount of extra hours learning about couples so you can say you’re a couples specialist.” It’s not a requirement.
@@jacalynwetzel8370 you get it bestie!! x
She says she's not smiling or snickering through this but look.
.. She's smiling
And has been all week.
Thats a headshot, she diagnosed her with PTSD before giving CAPS5, a test PCL5 specifically mentioned and did not follow any standardised instructions.
I don't know why, but I have a feeling this Dr. Hugues does not like men - period!
this lawyer is a pro, methodical, respectful, I like his style
She’s so defensive. It’s not a good look.
This lawyer is the best so amazing to see his work in the trial thank you for the amazing work
Btw this lawyer is amazing he always has something up his sleeve, don’t underestimate him🔥
Some people were slagging his approach the other day but I have liked both his humour and his dogged approach. He's a legal Columbo!
Yea, it’s the ones that sneak up from beneath that are the most dangerous! And he’s one of those lawyers. That’s more scary than lawyers that immediately strike and go for offense, in my opinion.
No way back now, if you admit to improper procedures for diagnosing amber, probably gonna lose your credibility, if not your license
what an excellent lawyer! Straightforward and still tricky and extremely clever. His law firm is hopefully super proud to have him
Her smirking is so unsettling
She makes me feel uncomfortable and I'm looking through a TV scream the real her has shown it's true colours
Like a snake.
WOW! Johnny’s attorneys are in another league to Amber’s😂👍
Justice League? 👀
Easier when you're honest.
@@diegomv90 aquamannnnnnnn
Amber Heard’s expression says it all.. she is amused and enjoying all these discussions about her PTSD diagnoses
She’s once again smirking, something she vehemently denied she did.
She likes to be in the center of atention, and she likes to fight, to be in court is her dream!
@@luisaritosa9700 histrionic personality disorder. dr.curry....ding ding ding 🔔🔔🔔🔔🔔
@@gladitude9 and the moment she get into that witness box,she starts to cry instantly or i should say try to.
Exactly... I hope the jury notices that
How satisfying is it to come back and see AH’s constant smirking? 🤣🤣🤣 not laughing now
OMG!!!! Wayne Dennison =The Terminator !!!
He simply destroys the opposing team’s so-called “expert” witness..and It’s quite embarrassing….but I love it 😂😂😂
Im not surprised that Amber is a super big liar, what im shocked on is all " specialist and expects " lying under oath come to court and LIE and destroy their own careers over a lying woman. UNBELIEVABLE like why? SAVE YOURSELVES.
Why? Cuz MONEY!
💰
Money
You are absolutely,that’s really mind boggling to say the least
I agree 100%. I'm disappointed her sister Whitney lied for her, too.
What an amazingly intelligent and professional team Johnny had. I can't say enough about them...
I don’t think you’re supposed to back-diagnose. The idea is if she has the diagnosis now. We don’t say you had pneumonia ten years ago so you must have it now.
Wayne Dennison is a hidden gem...everyone praising Camille but he struck the defendant in the most tactical manner..
Why hasn’t this woman had her license taken away? IMAGINE ALL THE PEOPLE SHE HAS MISDIAGNOSED OUT OF PURE LAZINESS!
"We do it wrong because it favors Ms. Heard. If we did it the right way it wouldn't help her case!" Says the person testifying for Ms. Heard.
Amber can look smug and smile all she wants now, she won't have much to be smiling about once this is over 😂🤡
My opinion is tat she thinks she's acting cool like Jhonny, but she looks like a maniac...
Exactly, her “career” is beyond OVER
She might win the case tho. She threw a tantrum in front of the jury, crying and saying people are sending death threats and threatening to microwave her baby.
And then has the cheek to state (whilst fake crying) that she isn't sat there laughing, looking smug etc etc ... Yet she's doing it whilst this incompetent woman is on the stand.
@@LavenderSky33 that was hilarious. There was SO much smirking today in particular lmao!
Very well done sir, Mr. Dennison is awesome 👌 👏
The lawyer's skills are awesome at being able to discredit Heards, so-called experts. Brilliance in action
The way she kept saying ‘AS IVE ALREADY TOLD YOU’ says all we need to know
JD playing Candy Crush while Dr. Hughes gets grilled… awesome 😎
Amber paid for the diagnosis. That’s what her rebuttal testimony proves. She did a bunch of check lists and gave her the diagnosis.
Seriously Dr Curry nailed it. High functioning manipulator can try to fake the checklist.
@@pamelasheridan2178 I really had a good laugh when Dr Curry explained one of the tests is used to detect malignering, in which she scored really way to high. I just pictured Amber ticking away blissfully unaware she was being tested for lying 🤦🏼♀️😄
TAKE HER LICENSE AWAY
this woman needs to have her license revoked. im working on my psychology degree and it is common knowledge that you cannot administer these kinds of assessments like that. shes practically implying the instructions are just there for no reason. thered obviously reasons why they must be administered in certain ways to prevent bias and misinterpretations. she is a threat to her clients well being and treatment. this is how people get misdiagnosed and treated for something they dont have. that wastes peoples money and time and leaves them suffering longer. absolutely shameful to this practice.
Wow. How humiliating a lawyer gives a basic review of BASIC clinical diagnosis principles 😧
Another EXCELLENT Lawyer on Team JOHNNY!🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟