Great question! We run our SkyTrak off of an Android tablet, and although we haven't looked too closely into the graphics on a tablet, we aren't sure there's much you can do!
There's something I''m curious about: Is it 100% true that you need Nvidia graphics for a Foresight simulator? Googling seems to suggest yes, but wondering what your experience on the matter is. I have an all AMD system, so was wondering if I might need to update/swap to Nvidia if I went with a GC3 or GCQuad based simulator.
No way graphics that are this bad need a whopping RTX 3080. The i7 must be overkill too. Im willing to bet the simulators are single core games. Getting an i3 will get you the same result ad an i7. There isnt THAT much power neended to do some physics math and then render the graphics to display it. The screenshot you showed for one of the games only needed a GTX970 which means most mid range laptops with integrated graphics can even surpass that power
The specs we go off of are recommended by the software makers, nothing we have control over! We might have gotten some "overkill" computers, but it's not a bad idea to future proof your setup assuming more options will come out that demand more from a PC.
This is awesome, thank you so much
We love to hear that!
How about graphic for skytrak and WGT since WGT isn't available for PC?
Great question! We run our SkyTrak off of an Android tablet, and although we haven't looked too closely into the graphics on a tablet, we aren't sure there's much you can do!
When I open GS pro the highest resolution option is 1080p. It doesn’t even show 4k below that. Any thoughts why?
Does your projector/computer not have 4K capability?
There's something I''m curious about: Is it 100% true that you need Nvidia graphics for a Foresight simulator?
Googling seems to suggest yes, but wondering what your experience on the matter is.
I have an all AMD system, so was wondering if I might need to update/swap to Nvidia if I went with a GC3 or GCQuad based simulator.
That is a great question! We don't directly sell Foresight products, so we haven't done extensive testing like that with them!
No way graphics that are this bad need a whopping RTX 3080. The i7 must be overkill too. Im willing to bet the simulators are single core games. Getting an i3 will get you the same result ad an i7. There isnt THAT much power neended to do some physics math and then render the graphics to display it.
The screenshot you showed for one of the games only needed a GTX970 which means most mid range laptops with integrated graphics can even surpass that power
The specs we go off of are recommended by the software makers, nothing we have control over! We might have gotten some "overkill" computers, but it's not a bad idea to future proof your setup assuming more options will come out that demand more from a PC.