The problem is. Once immigrants are established here, they too sometimes pick up bias based on where their group falls politically. The politics and propanda of RACE in this country are not relegated to Republican politicians.
No but 99% of the violence vistited upon them, and black people, and Muslims, and gays/lesbians, and trans people, and drag queens, and Nancy's Pelosi's husband, and almost all mass shootings are from cisgender, white, extremist conservatives. Every American n*zi terrorist, including the Ku Klux Klan is a right winger.
Nobody said peckerwood. Nobody said cracker Nobody even said Dahmer. All this racist nonsense is one sided. Black and Brown people are trying to improve their lives, unlike racists who want to go back in to ancient times.
Please replace MTG, PLEASE HURRY. "They are replacing us." She doesn't need that job, she needs replaced. She also thinks that $174,000.00 isn't enough?!
@@hadara69 All Democrats are fully indoctrinated with their discredited, Marxist Ideology from a young age! At home, then school, then Uni (if they can get in) and finally, at work, which gets more limited for them every day.
@@deadname... sure your not a trump fan?? You sure defend him like one. Trump doesn't live rent free in my head, but that WOULD be just like him though, screwing someone ELSE out of thier rent money!!! Trumps a crook, and you should keep an eye on crooks, I will admit, keeping up with trumps crimes takes some effort, he commits SO many of them, Besides, he loves the attention!! 🇺🇲
@@del_boy_trotter yes, you certainly have "Trump Dummy Syndrome", but there's treatment now!! It's easy, as follows; 1) spread cheeks apart 2) remove head from ass 3) STOP SENDING A BILLIONAIRE YOUR MONEY!!! 4) spend some time with your family instead of Trump!! See!! Easy!! A couple weeks of that, and you'll be cured!!! 🇺🇲
Colored People is a very outdated term a term that was used in signage to show which bathrooms we were ALLOWED to use and which water fountains were for us and what not. There’s a lot of pain in that phrasing
Yet "people of color" is a phrase tossed around every day all day without issue, and part of acronyms like NAACP which literally has "colored people" in it.
The audio is terrible. I couldn't understand most of what those people were saying. If you can take the time to put those videos up then take a bit more time to caption it
chenyk you are a voice of leadership and. positive progress...everynow and again I wonder how stoic It appears you become. But above all it be known, your work is welcome and apreciated
*The inconvenient truth of the democratic party:* The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynchings, and fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s. In contrast, the Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party. Its mission was to stop the spread of slavery into the new western territories with the aim of abolishing it entirely. This effort, however, was dealt a major blow by the Supreme Court. In the 1857 case *Dred Scott v. Sandford,* the court ruled that slaves aren’t citizens; they’re property. The seven justices who voted in favor of slavery? All Democrats. The two justices who dissented? *Both Republicans.* The slavery question was, of course, ultimately resolved by a bloody civil war. The commanderin-chief during that war was the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln - the man who freed the slaves.
@orebijelic7741 Please educate yourself. Here's more information for your own educational purposes: *The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’* _By Clay Risen_ *NY Times* "Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members -- and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a "Southern strategy" that championed "states' rights." (THIS is what YOU believe is the "Southern Strategy.") It's an easy story to believe, but this year, two political scientists called it into question. In their book "The End of Southern Exceptionalism," Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth. In the postwar era, they note that the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class. This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however -- and here's the surprise -- even those in areas with large black populations stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.) The two scholars support their claim with an extensive survey of election returns and voter surveys. To give just one example: in the 50s, among Southerners in the low-income tercile, 43 percent voted for Republican Presidential candidates, while in the high-income tercile, 53 percent voted Republican; by the 80s, those figures were 51 percent and 77 percent, respectively. Wealthy Southerners shifted rightward in droves, but poorer ones didn't. To be sure, Shafer says, many whites in the South aggressively opposed liberal Democrats on race issues. "But when folks went to the polling booths," he says, "they didn't shoot off their own toes. They voted by their economic preferences, not racial preferences." Shafer says these results should give liberals hope. "If Southern politics is about class and not race," he says, "then they can get it back."
@orebijelic7741 The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’ By Clay Risen NY TIMES Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members -- and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a "Southern strategy" that championed "states' rights." It's an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question. In their book "The End of Southern Exceptionalism," Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth. In the postwar era, they note, the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class. This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however -- and here's the surprise -- even those in areas with large black populations, stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.) The two scholars support their claim with an extensive survey of election returns and voter surveys. To give just one example: in the 50s, among Southerners in the low-income tercile, 43 percent voted for Republican Presidential candidates, while in the high-income tercile, 53 percent voted Republican; by the 80s, those figures were 51 percent and 77 percent, respectively. Wealthy Southerners shifted rightward in droves but poorer ones didn't. To be sure, Shafer says, many whites in the South aggressively opposed liberal Democrats on race issues. "But when folks went to the polling booths," he says, "they didn't shoot off their own toes. They voted by their economic preferences, not racial preferences." Shafer says these results should give liberals hope. "If Southern politics is about class and not race," he says, "then they can get it back."
There is, but those verses are taking out of context. 1. Surah Al-Baqarah (2:191): This verse essentially advises the early Muslims that if they're under attack in a place where they've been driven out from, it's permissible to defend themselves. It emphasizes, however, that even under such circumstances, any aggression must only be proportionate to the threat faced, not more. 2. Surah At-Tawbah (9:5): This verse was revealed in response to the Meccans breaking a peace treaty. It permitted Muslims to fight against those who breached the treaty. However, it was clear that anyone who didn't break the treaty, or those who showed remorse and performed their religious duties, were to be left in peace. This highlights principles of justice and mercy, even in conflict situations. Thus, these verses should not be understood as a general command to violence but as context-specific permissions for self-defense in response to persecution and treaty violations.
“Great Replacement Theory”. Just go look it up if you’ve never heard that phrase. It’s what they believe the LW is doing and it’s racist HS based on old Nazi tropes/myths. Hope that helps.
Why do we even have 2 mention skin color🤔 wen I talk 2 anybody anything I don't say "wel maria the white one not brown mocha dark choco one" tf people🤦🏽♀️
Are you even aware the congressman’s who said “colored people” was referencing how he disagreed with diversity in our military? Think it through dumbo 😂
If you’re gonna troll. You better know the context to which you are speaking. Colored People throughout American 🇺🇸 history always gives reference to segregation.
A simple visit to Charleston SC Slave Museum would get you up to speed on the use of “Colored People” dumbo. Learn your freaking history, which includes Black History. 👌
The Ramen commercial cracks me up, lol. Ew. And also, I'm not a regular Ramen sort of person. I cook all sorts of things to go in it. Straight Ramen is disgusting no matter what flavor you buy. Add sauces, stri fry extra stuff, have fresh things to go with it, and finally.....experiment!
Whilst the people in question may well be highly prejudicial people, in order to highlight such things, this is not really how to go about it. On the contrary, all this video really does is highlight how foolish people like Jayar Jackson are. If you are unable or unwilling t accept that coloured and person of colour are exactly the same thing and then go as far as to try and justify one over the other then sadly you deserve any ridicule and mocking that may come your way. But far worse than that is that whilst he and others of similar mindsets are demonstrating hyper/oversensitivity on a grand scale scale, those that may well be trying to wind them up win with so much ease and succeed in diverting discussion and attention from rather more important issues that really do affect people beyond the incredibly thin skin of some that should simply maintain focus on the relevant.
It bothers me when we specifically and narrowly attack word choice. If people are racists, better to let them use the words that make this clear than to allow them to hide behind the language of political correctness. If people are not racists, that should become clear from their message, even if they make occasional slips of the tongue or are not au fait with the language trends of a given community (and my goodness there are a _lot_ of speech communities, I'm not sure the suggestion that you should be in constant contact with all of them is remotely tenable). This is not to say that there is no such thing as objectionable vocabulary, far from it, but it's more informative and nets us faster progress if we can focus more on what people are saying and less on how they are saying it. Sound bites are just not the same as reasoned arguments, and sound bite based attacks are cheap attacks. Or if I can put this the other way around, systemic racism is racism that has learned to modulate its vocabulary perfectly, and surely this is the more dangerous enemy? Better to know who and where our enemies are by letting them fly their flag. Or?
@@rickbrickles1410 My point is that we should focus less on words and more on ideas. It's hard to do both, and excessive focus on words may make it *easier* for bad ideas to become embedded.
@@stephenspackman5573the issue is, thoughts become words, and words become actions. We went through the 90s, where "language police" was retired. Everyone just said what they thought... In movies, music and media. We relaxed the rules around responsibility, and here we are: 3 decades later, with elected representatives bought and paid for by corporate lobbyists, repealing civil rights and voting rights, returning to the days of xenophobic speaking points to keep people easily manipulated. So yes, it is important to point out racist, xenophobic, sexist, ageist, lookist, language. Especially if we want a better tomorrow than what we are watching today.
I’ll say it again do republicans have any vetting background checks or did this guy wonder in from the Hollywood actor strike a new TV movie Dracula goes to Washington
I completely understand why she would want the words chicken from the records however I would not. The reason being that by striking it from the record you're erasing it from history essentially. I would request that the word be highlighted with a quotation next to it that it should not have been said and should be stricken from the record but is being kept for history's sake. Also it should be noted next to that or however you note it who made the statement.
I would bet if Corporate America would bring jobs back to the country and opened up factories and the opportunity arose everyone of different ethnic backgrounds would be working together.
@@Lujain511 That's all religions have been through history. My point is if the guy doesn't know about a particular religion like being Muslim then he shouldn't speak for or against them. What he was describing was beliefs of an extremist group of Muslims not all Muslims. Westboro Baptist Church is an extremist Christian Church but they don't represent all of Christianity. And getting to know a person's religious beliefs by sitting down and having an actual conversation back and forth just giving information neither side trying to convert the other is something that I think should be done in order to help one side understand where the other side's coming from and why and to see whether or not there's a way they can work together. The problem with this is it's being called out in a political setting and religion and politics should never be intertwined. There are so many examples throughout history as to why religion should not be in the political wheelhouse.
Yes, there is a lot of racist in the Republican Party. Guess what, just as many in the Democrat party also. Why is it you only bring up republicans and not democrats? It is not a party problem, it is a sin problem.
And yet I barely see that much of that coming from an actual politician on national TV/news channels while Republicans just talk out of their brainless minds they just say it up front because they are too self centered and egotistical to try to learn about the culture of the people the condone same can apply to Democrats but they actually are more open and yes any party can have racist but to same as equal or anywhere near the number as Republicans is just a hypothetical just mere speculation with barley any live footage of evidence to back up so yes they CAN(key word by the way) but that doesn't automatically means they have near the same amount as those Republicans
Wait...isn't that America?? MTG🤢 Why do they forget we're all immigrants...? Unless of course your American Indian, or Eskimo .Oh yes, I forgot, they are apparently not WOKE, since they don't know our history🤦
"...Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. "-Acts 16:30-31 KJV “As it is written, ‘There is none righteous, no, not one.'” (Romans 3:10, KJV) “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” (Romans 3:23, KJV) “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” (Romans 6:23, KJV) “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” (Romans 5:8, KJV) “For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” (Romans 10:13, KJV)
Yeah, i heard Alan West, Tim Scott, Ben Carson, Condoleeza Rice, Clarence Thomas, and Hershel Walker all asked their parents what European countries they are from.
@@neutral6941 You said, and I quote: _"Republicans r white skinned people from European countries"_ I just SHOWED you that not ALL Republicans are _white skinned people from European countries"_ What is wrong with you?.
@@neutral6941 Of COOOOOOUUUUUURSE the video didn't "show other then (you mean than) white skinned republicans" - this is the YOUNG TURKS, their whole purpose is to demonize white skinned people. You going to pretend it isn't?
Clearly, You haven't done any back breaking, proper manual work on a farm - for weeks on end... I've got news for You... not everything can be done by machines - certain tasks still requires the human touch.
Genuine question. As a European, I do not know what are the correct words, that can be used to describe black and mixed race people without offendung anyone?
get some black people in your life, savces u from being ignorant. Im serious. If u actually had more culture in your life u would know what to say and not say. Its not enough to say youre curious, what do u say?
Really? And what about all the democrat hair pulling when racist affirmative action was taken down? Give me a break. That was pretty much universal among them, while showing a couple of clips of republican individuals is hardly representative of them.
Well , right-wingers wanted to get rid of Affirmative Action because they don't want to go to school with African Americans , that's the reality of the situation. Killing Affirmative Action is a way of re-segregating the schools , that's why the right-wing was celebrating the end of the program. Don't try to spin this....
On 16th September 1620, the ship The Mayflower left the port of Plymouth, England, filled with 65 radical, puritanical and fundamentalist religious immigrants... The indigenous peoples of the unfortunate land that the Mayflower unleashed those 65 people upon would never know peace again. In the years that followed, genocide & slavery (imported slaves is another story) was brought down upon them as they were driven forcibly from their lands so that that land could be stolen. They would be continually oppressed right up to the present day. It was a dark time in human history, but it was to be repeated in 1917 after a British Earl gave away land in Canaan/Judea (for political reasons) that he had no rights to... The brutality is ongoing. This is the kind of America that some think of as "Great" and is what some republicans want us to return to and go beyond, and why history is being forcibly revised in some southern states.
My fluent Spanish came from working with immigrants, not just me, but generations behind me. I spent my 20s with a watchful eye. They mess up, i call la migra, I would say. It never happened. Okay, one or two coworkers in my life messed up. The campesinos cleaned up the mess and cooked for everyone else. th-cam.com/video/4SKZ_-EkKR8/w-d-xo.html
African Americans have been part of the US MILITARY during the revolutionary war.
But, they weren't African-Americans. The Revolutionary war was fought by "The United Colonies' - USA came later.
@@del_boy_trotter you sure, bud?
The problem is. Once immigrants are established here, they too sometimes pick up bias based on where their group falls politically. The politics and propanda of RACE in this country are not relegated to Republican politicians.
No but 99% of the violence vistited upon them, and black people, and Muslims, and gays/lesbians, and trans people, and drag queens, and Nancy's Pelosi's husband, and almost all mass shootings are from cisgender, white, extremist conservatives. Every American n*zi terrorist, including the Ku Klux Klan is a right winger.
True I hate to admit, but it is true. 😒
Oh piss off, faux outrage troll. Lol
This is very true-though the presumption that “their group” falls somewhere politically is _itself_ an example of the difficulty :-}.
Auntie wasn't having that BS, she said "I didn't ask for an amendment, I want the words to be stricken from the record". Damnn right!!!@
At no time in history has the people calling for censorship been the good guys
Nobody said peckerwood.
Nobody said cracker
Nobody even said Dahmer.
All this racist nonsense is one sided.
Black and Brown people are trying to improve their lives, unlike racists who want to go back in to ancient times.
Don’t hide behind someone else’s hate.
Those people who supported slavery were horrible.
Those would be the democrats
@@MicrowavedBurritosShadow Exactly.
Please replace MTG, PLEASE HURRY. "They are replacing us." She doesn't need that job, she needs replaced. She also thinks that $174,000.00 isn't enough?!
It’s not when your dealing with people who don’t deal in facts. And only spread lies. !!! And the say RACIST
@fredziffle4912 I have an idea, exchange her for Kamala 'Word-salad' Harris! At least MTG is understandable!
Every accusation by a Republican is a confession.
Given the entire vocabulary of a Democrat is the charge - "Racist" then it's a method of teaching you people!
@@del_boy_trotter “Teaching” or indoctrinating?
Which is it, home-schooled?
🤦
@@hadara69 All Democrats are fully indoctrinated with their discredited, Marxist Ideology from a young age! At home, then school, then Uni (if they can get in) and finally, at work, which gets more limited for them every day.
@@del_boy_trotterdemocrats are the indoctrinated ones? Sure. 😂
If you don't vote for me you ain't black.
So one comment Biden apologized for long ago abnegates the GOP’s pervasive racism?
@balrog322 😂not one comment from Republicans about skin color or race.😊
Being offended is a choice and it seems lately to be a religion.
Yeah!!! Just watch trump pray at his alter every time the news comes on!!! He's the "victim", remember??? 🇺🇲
@@mholland9330
I'm not a Trump fan but....
Trump owns a lot of real estate, he doesn't need to live rent free in your head.
@@deadname... sure your not a trump fan?? You sure defend him like one. Trump doesn't live rent free in my head, but that WOULD be just like him though, screwing someone ELSE out of thier rent money!!! Trumps a crook, and you should keep an eye on crooks, I will admit, keeping up with trumps crimes takes some effort, he commits SO many of them, Besides, he loves the attention!! 🇺🇲
@@mholland9330 TDS is alive and living rent-free inside what passes for your brain!
@@del_boy_trotter yes, you certainly have "Trump Dummy Syndrome", but there's treatment now!! It's easy, as follows;
1) spread cheeks apart
2) remove head from ass
3) STOP SENDING A BILLIONAIRE YOUR MONEY!!!
4) spend some time with your family instead of Trump!!
See!! Easy!! A couple weeks of that, and you'll be cured!!! 🇺🇲
When I was growing up the term ‘racist’ had a specific definition. Now it has about as much specificity as the term ‘woman’.
…said a racist troll boy.
Colored People is a very outdated term a term that was used in signage to show which bathrooms we were ALLOWED to use and which water fountains were for us and what not. There’s a lot of pain in that phrasing
Yet "people of color" is a phrase tossed around every day all day without issue, and part of acronyms like NAACP which literally has "colored people" in it.
"Colored", I thought that went out in the 60s.
The audio is terrible. I couldn't understand most of what those people were saying. If you can take the time to put those videos up then take a bit more time to caption it
chenyk you are a voice of leadership and. positive progress...everynow and again I wonder how stoic It appears you become. But above all it be known, your work is welcome and apreciated
This is a propaganda machine, nothing more
*The inconvenient truth of the democratic party:*
The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynchings, and fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s.
In contrast, the Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party. Its mission was to stop the spread of slavery into the new western territories with the aim of abolishing it entirely. This effort, however, was dealt a major blow by the Supreme Court. In the 1857 case *Dred Scott v. Sandford,* the court ruled that slaves aren’t citizens; they’re property. The seven justices who voted in favor of slavery? All Democrats. The two justices who dissented? *Both Republicans.*
The slavery question was, of course, ultimately resolved by a bloody civil war. The commanderin-chief during that war was the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln - the man who freed the slaves.
Two words. Southern. Strategy.
@orebijelic7741 Please educate yourself. Here's more information for your own educational purposes:
*The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’*
_By Clay Risen_
*NY Times*
"Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics.
From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members -- and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote.
Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a "Southern strategy" that championed "states' rights." (THIS is what YOU believe is the "Southern Strategy.")
It's an easy story to believe, but this year, two political scientists called it into question. In their book "The End of Southern Exceptionalism," Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth.
In the postwar era, they note that the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class. This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however -- and here's the surprise -- even those in areas with large black populations stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.)
The two scholars support their claim with an extensive survey of election returns and voter surveys.
To give just one example: in the 50s, among Southerners in the low-income tercile, 43 percent voted for Republican Presidential candidates, while in the high-income tercile, 53 percent voted Republican; by the 80s, those figures were 51 percent and 77 percent, respectively. Wealthy Southerners shifted rightward in droves, but poorer ones didn't.
To be sure, Shafer says, many whites in the South aggressively opposed liberal Democrats on race issues. "But when folks went to the polling booths," he says, "they didn't shoot off their own toes. They voted by their economic preferences, not racial preferences." Shafer says these results should give liberals hope. "If Southern politics is about class and not race," he says, "then they can get it back."
@orebijelic7741 The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’
By Clay Risen
NY TIMES
Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members -- and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a "Southern strategy" that championed "states' rights."
It's an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question. In their book "The End of Southern Exceptionalism," Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth.
In the postwar era, they note, the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class. This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however -- and here's the surprise -- even those in areas with large black populations, stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.)
The two scholars support their claim with an extensive survey of election returns and voter surveys. To give just one example: in the 50s, among Southerners in the low-income tercile, 43 percent voted for Republican Presidential candidates, while in the high-income tercile, 53 percent voted Republican; by the 80s, those figures were 51 percent and 77 percent, respectively.
Wealthy Southerners shifted rightward in droves but poorer ones didn't.
To be sure, Shafer says, many whites in the South aggressively opposed liberal Democrats on race issues. "But when folks went to the polling booths," he says, "they didn't shoot off their own toes. They voted by their economic preferences, not racial preferences." Shafer says these results should give liberals hope. "If Southern politics is about class and not race," he says, "then they can get it back."
@@orebijelic7741 2 words: *Educate Yourself*
@orebijelic7741 The -Democrats- *DEMONRATS* always have & always WILL be the Party of Racists!
I’m sorry. What do the letters in NAACP stand for? Anybody know?
If you see a left winger help them un alive themselves.
Cry more.
Colored people, people of color, literally the same thing. Cope
No it isn’t, sub human racist vermin. You re the definition of a failed abortion.
Everybody's colored or you wouldn't be able to see 'em!
Leave your porch and meet everyone! Listen to stories and learn heritage! Your life will be better for it.
Perfect example of jim crow good old white folks. Fact. VOTE BLUE STAY TRUE TO AMERICA 🇺🇸 AND PRESIDENT BIDEN.
Democrats were the authors who enacted Jim Crow Laws, do get your history straight! As were the KKK, Own it!
Jim Crow→ democrats FACT!!!
biden can’t even speak right. Constantly confused, falling over, he’s done nothing dumbass.
If you don't vote for me then you ain't black was another good one! Oh wait, that was Biden.... he's a Democrat
How was he wrong?
Doesn’t Trump say the opposite every time he asks for our support?
@hadara69 you'll have to explain that, any examples?
So what happen with the Blacks that voted Republican ???... they joined the party of LOSERS!
Replacing? Like the Stepford Wives? OMG
They should have left "Colored People" on the record so everyone can see who they are.
What the hell that's a clear violation of his oath of office this ain't Up For Debate kick him out of the chair for his judgment is corrupted
Racism's queer; we're one -race, human-race, let's progress, my family, humans.
Wait, doesn't the Koran actually say to kill infidels?
There is, but those verses are taking out of context.
1. Surah Al-Baqarah (2:191): This verse essentially advises the early Muslims that if they're under attack in a place where they've been driven out from, it's permissible to defend themselves. It emphasizes, however, that even under such circumstances, any aggression must only be proportionate to the threat faced, not more.
2. Surah At-Tawbah (9:5): This verse was revealed in response to the Meccans breaking a peace treaty. It permitted Muslims to fight against those who breached the treaty. However, it was clear that anyone who didn't break the treaty, or those who showed remorse and performed their religious duties, were to be left in peace. This highlights principles of justice and mercy, even in conflict situations.
Thus, these verses should not be understood as a general command to violence but as context-specific permissions for self-defense in response to persecution and treaty violations.
Why do people keep talking about ‘Replacing’ no one is doing that
France
“Great Replacement Theory”. Just go look it up if you’ve never heard that phrase. It’s what they believe the LW is doing and it’s racist HS based on old Nazi tropes/myths.
Hope that helps.
@@straight-white-man Were the French “replaced”, Trump chump, or do you JUST HATE MUSLIMS? You tell me now…
@@straight-white-man?
MTG 👎👎
Why do we even have 2 mention skin color🤔 wen I talk 2 anybody anything I don't say "wel maria the white one not brown mocha dark choco one" tf people🤦🏽♀️
NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of...COLORED PEOPLE 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 NAACP IS WAYCIST 😱😱😱🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
Yeah founded by black people, dip shit. Please, give us another. Lol You’re not such a bright racist troll boy, are you?
Are you even aware the congressman’s who said “colored people” was referencing how he disagreed with diversity in our military? Think it through dumbo 😂
If you’re gonna troll. You better know the context to which you are speaking. Colored People throughout American 🇺🇸 history always gives reference to segregation.
A simple visit to Charleston SC Slave Museum would get you up to speed on the use of “Colored People” dumbo. Learn your freaking history, which includes Black History. 👌
Trolling racist.
The Ramen commercial cracks me up, lol. Ew. And also, I'm not a regular Ramen sort of person. I cook all sorts of things to go in it. Straight Ramen is disgusting no matter what flavor you buy. Add sauces, stri fry extra stuff, have fresh things to go with it, and finally.....experiment!
Wasn't the first video shown on TYT and the second one?
Nicely said Ana👍🏽
Whilst the people in question may well be highly prejudicial people, in order to highlight such things, this is not really how to go about it. On the contrary, all this video really does is highlight how foolish people like Jayar Jackson are. If you are unable or unwilling t accept that coloured and person of colour are exactly the same thing and then go as far as to try and justify one over the other then sadly you deserve any ridicule and mocking that may come your way. But far worse than that is that whilst he and others of similar mindsets are demonstrating hyper/oversensitivity on a grand scale scale, those that may well be trying to wind them up win with so much ease and succeed in diverting discussion and attention from rather more important issues that really do affect people beyond the incredibly thin skin of some that should simply maintain focus on the relevant.
It bothers me when we specifically and narrowly attack word choice. If people are racists, better to let them use the words that make this clear than to allow them to hide behind the language of political correctness. If people are not racists, that should become clear from their message, even if they make occasional slips of the tongue or are not au fait with the language trends of a given community (and my goodness there are a _lot_ of speech communities, I'm not sure the suggestion that you should be in constant contact with all of them is remotely tenable).
This is not to say that there is no such thing as objectionable vocabulary, far from it, but it's more informative and nets us faster progress if we can focus more on what people are saying and less on how they are saying it. Sound bites are just not the same as reasoned arguments, and sound bite based attacks are cheap attacks.
Or if I can put this the other way around, systemic racism is racism that has learned to modulate its vocabulary perfectly, and surely this is the more dangerous enemy?
Better to know who and where our enemies are by letting them fly their flag.
Or?
What your point ???
@@rickbrickles1410 My point is that we should focus less on words and more on ideas. It's hard to do both, and excessive focus on words may make it *easier* for bad ideas to become embedded.
Preaching to the choir !!! Appreciate!!!
Beautiful, well worded, well thought out. I wish I was as eloquent
@@stephenspackman5573the issue is, thoughts become words, and words become actions.
We went through the 90s, where "language police" was retired.
Everyone just said what they thought... In movies, music and media.
We relaxed the rules around responsibility, and here we are:
3 decades later, with elected representatives bought and paid for by corporate lobbyists, repealing civil rights and voting rights, returning to the days of xenophobic speaking points to keep people easily manipulated.
So yes, it is important to point out racist, xenophobic, sexist, ageist, lookist, language.
Especially if we want a better tomorrow than what we are watching today.
Colored people is offensive but people of color is ok. lol clownworld
the right are no different here in the UK.
What shut no it isn't, keep that racist stuff in USA, don't be dragging us into it get off your phone and go outside 🤣
Couldn’t hear anything.
What was that back noise
Thanks for calling out the snowflakes.
I’ll say it again do republicans have any vetting background checks or did this guy wonder in from the Hollywood actor strike a new TV movie Dracula goes to Washington
wow! 😳 Thanks TYT!
Its a good thing that average white millennials are offended on behalf of all black people. # feeling blessed
Derpy derp!
You're a big fan of rank hypocrisy then?
Exorcist Greene , remember the vomiting in the movie
Although you may not be aware, you are being or have been socially engineered to think how you think
DeSatan of Florida
I completely understand why she would want the words chicken from the records however I would not. The reason being that by striking it from the record you're erasing it from history essentially. I would request that the word be highlighted with a quotation next to it that it should not have been said and should be stricken from the record but is being kept for history's sake. Also it should be noted next to that or however you note it who made the statement.
Stop our show; show I my out- route. This level of foolishness, I've had enough of it-.
I would bet if Corporate America would bring jobs back to the country and opened up factories and the opportunity arose everyone of different ethnic backgrounds would be working together.
😂
Don't speak about a religion you don't know about. They need to educate themselves by talking with people from those different religions.
@@Lujain511 That's all religions have been through history. My point is if the guy doesn't know about a particular religion like being Muslim then he shouldn't speak for or against them. What he was describing was beliefs of an extremist group of Muslims not all Muslims. Westboro Baptist Church is an extremist Christian Church but they don't represent all of Christianity. And getting to know a person's religious beliefs by sitting down and having an actual conversation back and forth just giving information neither side trying to convert the other is something that I think should be done in order to help one side understand where the other side's coming from and why and to see whether or not there's a way they can work together. The problem with this is it's being called out in a political setting and religion and politics should never be intertwined. There are so many examples throughout history as to why religion should not be in the political wheelhouse.
Yes, there is a lot of racist in the Republican Party. Guess what, just as many in the Democrat party also. Why is it you only bring up republicans and not democrats? It is not a party problem, it is a sin problem.
😂yeah, right!!
I agree with your point
And yet I barely see that much of that coming from an actual politician on national TV/news channels while Republicans just talk out of their brainless minds they just say it up front because they are too self centered and egotistical to try to learn about the culture of the people the condone same can apply to Democrats but they actually are more open and yes any party can have racist but to same as equal or anywhere near the number as Republicans is just a hypothetical just mere speculation with barley any live footage of evidence to back up so yes they CAN(key word by the way) but that doesn't automatically means they have near the same amount as those Republicans
LOTS OF FOREIGN TROLLS HERE TODAY!
Yeah, they really tossed some chum in the water
Slow news day huh? Every one of these videos have had their own segment at least once in the past on your show.
Did you troll them all?
Wait...isn't that America?? MTG🤢 Why do they forget we're all immigrants...? Unless of course your American Indian, or Eskimo .Oh yes, I forgot, they are apparently not WOKE, since they don't know our history🤦
Eskimo ←racist democrat name for Inuit people
@@straight-white-man sorry..I didn't know...I will do better👍
@@beckyb4077 cool.. just don't vote for pisspants Biden and I'll forgive you darlin😚
Grammatically they are the same but the intend is different, kind of like the "er" v. "a".
Now every single conservatism is going to pull out the "I'm around minorities all the time" line. 🤦
"...Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. "-Acts 16:30-31 KJV
“As it is written, ‘There is none righteous, no, not one.'” (Romans 3:10, KJV)
“For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” (Romans 3:23, KJV)
“For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” (Romans 6:23, KJV)
“But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” (Romans 5:8, KJV)
“For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” (Romans 10:13, KJV)
The boys 👴
Ana That was PERFECT 🥰
As a non american, would you say that Alabama is the worst state of the US?
Mississippi is worst but all of the Red States are really bad like Alabama , West Virginia , Louisiana , etc.
Florida's about to take the lead by a large, phallic outcropping
Blue cities and especially cetain areas within those blue cities.
Vote Republican
More like vote for neither
Lol this isnt new
If it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck ,walks and swims like a duck it is more than likely a duck.
More than likely racist
Snow flakes is correct..
Republicans r white skinned people from European countries. They should ask their parents what European country they r from.
Yeah, i heard Alan West, Tim Scott, Ben Carson, Condoleeza Rice, Clarence Thomas, and Hershel Walker all asked their parents what European countries they are from.
@chicomaki6103 , the white skinned people, u just named black politicians and none of them r in the video. Get a clue.
@@neutral6941 You said, and I quote: _"Republicans r white skinned people from European countries"_ I just SHOWED you that not ALL Republicans are _white skinned people from European countries"_ What is wrong with you?.
@chicomaki6103 ,I didn't say all republicans and the video didn't show other then white skinned republicans.
@@neutral6941 Of COOOOOOUUUUUURSE the video didn't "show other then (you mean than) white skinned republicans" - this is the YOUNG TURKS, their whole purpose is to demonize white skinned people. You going to pretend it isn't?
I was wondering when you all were going to discuss this.
Yes it would be great for immigrant s to replace all of the republicans
😂why would you want to starve to death, or be forced to work?😅 Republicans invent way more technology.
But Ana told me they’re not racist
*they're, now go to bed.
@@brettmaki9995 i fixed it 🤣
@@Loki_Leftist Good job, now do your homework and go to bed.
@@brettmaki9995 wanna tell me the issue you have with my comment?
@@Loki_Leftist NO! Next question.
Btw What do the letters in NAACP STAND FOR?
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
I’m Latino and republican with a mostly diverse family so yeah racist my ass. Everyone can be racist both liberals and conservatives.
I agree with the rant at the end to an extent farming is actually not hard. That is a lie told you by people that want to own all the land.
Clearly, You haven't done any back breaking, proper manual work on a farm - for weeks on end...
I've got news for You... not everything can be done by machines - certain tasks still requires the human touch.
Genuine question. As a European, I do not know what are the correct words, that can be used to describe black and mixed race people without offendung anyone?
get some black people in your life, savces u from being ignorant. Im serious. If u actually had more culture in your life u would know what to say and not say. Its not enough to say youre curious, what do u say?
U just said it you lemon 🤣
The Congress guy is just ignorant.... Likely said that without mal intent. It's not his fault he's living under a rock.
We just want to replace you!
ok rabbi
Who knew the NAACP was racist!
Really?
And what about all the democrat hair pulling when racist affirmative action was taken down?
Give me a break.
That was pretty much universal among them, while showing a couple of clips of republican individuals is hardly representative of them.
Well , right-wingers wanted to get rid of Affirmative Action because they don't want to go to school with African Americans , that's the reality of the situation. Killing Affirmative Action is a way of re-segregating the schools , that's why the right-wing was celebrating the end of the program. Don't try to spin this....
You people as a whole are just the American embarrassment
And the boomer is at it again, haven't you people destroyed this country enough?
Waoo
Who KNEW
Do not strike the words out! Let them go down in record and let people know his hatred forever!
It was built by slaves, not immigrants.
You're factually incorrect
On 16th September 1620, the ship The Mayflower left the port of Plymouth, England, filled with 65 radical, puritanical and fundamentalist religious immigrants...
The indigenous peoples of the unfortunate land that the Mayflower unleashed those 65 people upon would never know peace again. In the years that followed, genocide & slavery (imported slaves is another story) was brought down upon them as they were driven forcibly from their lands so that that land could be stolen. They would be continually oppressed right up to the present day.
It was a dark time in human history, but it was to be repeated in 1917 after a British Earl gave away land in Canaan/Judea (for political reasons) that he had no rights to... The brutality is ongoing.
This is the kind of America that some think of as "Great" and is what some republicans want us to return to and go beyond, and why history is being forcibly revised in some southern states.
I just stay in a white neighborhood and it’s the best
My fluent Spanish came from working with immigrants, not just me, but generations behind me. I spent my 20s with a watchful eye. They mess up, i call la migra, I would say. It never happened. Okay, one or two coworkers in my life messed up. The campesinos cleaned up the mess and cooked for everyone else.
th-cam.com/video/4SKZ_-EkKR8/w-d-xo.html