A highly illuminating discourse ! Simply brilliant ; I myself having been in the company of a Paramahamsa, a Realised Spiritual Master, am totally in sync with Sri Ramesh ! This single episode of Sri Ramesh should be good enough for any spiritual seeker to become comfortable with himself and the world around him and enjoy and suffer, rise and fall as the drama of life unfolds in all its perplexities with the innate and absolute under standing in the core of one's being that he is not the doer and obviously what can possibly bind or liberate anyone for the actions that were not his in the first place !
Thank you . A beautifully distilled talk based on Advaita , without the heaviness of spiritual gymnastics! Easy to accept these premises/ concept and to try and live the Truth . If it is Will of God . 🧘🤸🏽♀️🧗♀️
Was Ramesh a spiritual teacher or a spiritual MASTER? 🤔 If you are uncertain of the distinction between the two, I shall be MORE than happy to enlighten you.😇
As a hand seemingly moves of its own so does the (m)ind, (M)ind is conscious of the Presence of the Infinite, and dependent not on its content, but the Infinite Context.
I agree but isn't this just literally fatalism? Like accepting fatalism is true but with a happy attitude? I'm not implying that fatalism makes you sad, in my case, fatalism makes me strong and comfortable but is it REALLY true?
It’s strange that knowings and unknowings are always relevant and never absolute. There seems to be nothing to know and nothing to not know. All that’s to be known is already known and anything that’s not to be known, no one bothers to know anyway. The Pandora’s box also seems to be the schrodinger’s box, but with a cat and no explosives.
Can you accept this without the concept of god's will / cosmic law? That is to say, the ego's illusions of control is seen through but there is no divinity or law. This is a rhetorical question, because if "i am" is recognised it is self-evidently "god", but that can't really be understood conceptually. The gap is an abyss. Somehwat unrelated, but interesting that in later mettings from 2008 Ramesh is more likely to say that humans DO have total free will, only it's effectively useless as what you want is determined by genetics and conditioning, and the outcome of any action can't be known. This is quite a different concept to the simple statement that you are not the doer, maybe he felt it was more effective as a teaching, or maybe he just got less sharp.
This video is one of the best. All of his teachings are in here!
A highly illuminating discourse ! Simply brilliant ; I myself having been in the company of a Paramahamsa, a Realised Spiritual Master, am totally in sync with Sri Ramesh ! This single episode of Sri Ramesh should be good enough for any spiritual seeker to become comfortable with himself and the world around him and enjoy and suffer, rise and fall as the drama of life unfolds in all its perplexities with the innate and absolute under standing in the core of one's being that he is not the doer and obviously what can possibly bind or liberate anyone for the actions that were not his in the first place !
Are you VEGAN? 🌱
Thank you . A beautifully distilled talk based on Advaita , without the heaviness of spiritual gymnastics! Easy to accept these premises/ concept and to try and live the Truth . If it is Will of God . 🧘🤸🏽♀️🧗♀️
Very much appreciated. Thank you. This man is the real deal!
Was Ramesh a spiritual teacher or a spiritual MASTER? 🤔
If you are uncertain of the distinction between the two, I shall be MORE than happy to enlighten you.😇
@@TheWorldTeacher does it matter who he was?
all words are hust concept unless we realise the truth
It happens..
Enlightenment is deepening acceptance of divine
Thank you❤
As a hand seemingly moves of its own so does the (m)ind, (M)ind is conscious of the Presence of the Infinite, and dependent not on its content, but the Infinite Context.
Thank You So Much. TY!
Thank you for your free gifts.
Simple yet profound
59:00 only spiritual practice recommended by Ramesh
Many thanks for giving the time stamp 🙏🙏
I agree but isn't this just literally fatalism? Like accepting fatalism is true but with a happy attitude? I'm not implying that fatalism makes you sad, in my case, fatalism makes me strong and comfortable but is it REALLY true?
@@sorenarica no, it is not fatalism
🙏grateful to listen to this ,watching all his talks 🙏🙏 his explanation on ego 👌👌👌
❤️ u
🕉🙏😊💚 (one of the most clarifying speeches)
Thank You very much 💖💖💖
धन्यवाद
THIS IS ONE OF THE BEST TALK
Sings: “It ain’t necessarily so...” 🎤
This talk contains everything. Enjoy and follow!
Excellent!
🙏🏽
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
🌸🕉🌸
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
It’s strange that knowings and unknowings are always relevant and never absolute. There seems to be nothing to know and nothing to not know. All that’s to be known is already known and anything that’s not to be known, no one bothers to know anyway. The Pandora’s box also seems to be the schrodinger’s box, but with a cat and no explosives.
❤️
🙏
I am not the doer
Moreover.. No one else is doer
Finally no doership
True
1:04:54
Gut Schermau in Dingolfing ? Kontaktieren sie mich bitte
Ego wont allow you to remember that
" you are nothing "..
You're just quantum flux point
All stories are stories of doership
So we have doership in fiction
We have to deal fiction in fiction in fiction🤔🤔🤔
Are you comfortable with others action?
Are you comfortable with yours?
We have a taste of #deep sleep!"
Can you accept this without the concept of god's will / cosmic law? That is to say, the ego's illusions of control is seen through but there is no divinity or law. This is a rhetorical question, because if "i am" is recognised it is self-evidently "god", but that can't really be understood conceptually. The gap is an abyss.
Somehwat unrelated, but interesting that in later mettings from 2008 Ramesh is more likely to say that humans DO have total free will, only it's effectively useless as what you want is determined by genetics and conditioning, and the outcome of any action can't be known. This is quite a different concept to the simple statement that you are not the doer, maybe he felt it was more effective as a teaching, or maybe he just got less sharp.
1:07:08