What is Gaussian Noise?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • Explains how Gaussian noise arises in digital communication systems, and explains what i.i.d. means.
    * If you would like to support me to make these videos, you can join the Channel Membership, by hitting the "Join" button below the video, and making a contribution to support the cost of a coffee a month. It would be very much appreciated.
    Check out my 'search for signals in everyday life', by following my social media feeds:
    Facebook: www.facebook.c...
    Instagram: / iainexplains
    Related videos: (see www.iaincolling...)
    • What is White Gaussian Noise (WGN)? • What is White Gaussian...
    • What is a Gaussian Distribution? • What is a Gaussian Dis...
    • What is Noise Power in Communication Systems? • What is Noise Power in...
    • What is a Poisson Process? • What is a Poisson Proc...
    • What is Rayleigh Fading? • What is Rayleigh Fading?
    • What is Rician Fading? • What is Rician Fading?
    • What is the Central Limit Theorem? • What is the Central Li...
    • What is a Probability Density Function (p.d.f.)? • What is a Probability ...
    For a full list of Videos and Summary Sheets, goto: www.iaincolling...
    .

ความคิดเห็น • 57

  • @BigFatSandwitch
    @BigFatSandwitch 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The noise is gaussian because of central limit theorem

  • @ZeroPayonPC
    @ZeroPayonPC 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you sir, love you from Vietnam 🇻🇳

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm so glad you like the videos.

  • @PandeyShiva_
    @PandeyShiva_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow great explanation..❤️

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, I'm glad you liked it.

  • @uralmutlu4320
    @uralmutlu4320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quick question: the equation y=hx+n assumes that AWGN is added after the channel. what if part of the AWGN is caused by the transmitter electronics? then we will end up with y=h(n1+x)+n2, where n1 is the AWGN before the channel and n2 is the AWGN after the channel. We just assume that due to the central limit theorem, all the noise is modelled as a single AWGN value and added at the receiver. The question is: how do we model seperate noise sources? are there any reference where noise is added before and after transmission?
    PS: the same discussion has taken place in the previous post....

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question. No, we don't add the transmitter and receiver noises and assume it's OK due to the central limit theorem. Actually what happens is we simply ignore the transmitter noise. In most communication systems the transmit signal power is much higher than the transmitter's noise power, so the transmitter's noise has virtually no effect on the transmitted signal. At the receiver it's a different story, since the transmit power has dissipated by the time it reaches the receiver, so the received signal power is much lower, and is often comparable with the receiver noise power.

    • @uralmutlu4320
      @uralmutlu4320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for your reply. I guess the confusion comes from the way we model baseband communications, ie y=x+n, which implies noise is added onto the transmitted signal. In reality we should think of (x) as the transmitted signal seen by receiver.

  • @hanifanmohamad2327
    @hanifanmohamad2327 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Iain

  • @edwardboers1993
    @edwardboers1993 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the quick summary

  • @pitmaler4439
    @pitmaler4439 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You said that when we have stochastic process (here with the elactrons) with many realizations, we get a GAUSSIAN shape of the probability density function. Is there a special theorem that states that? Thanks

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This video explains it: "What is the Central Limit Theorem?" th-cam.com/video/Xd0_kez9smk/w-d-xo.html

  • @siixsiix3903
    @siixsiix3903 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. Ty

  • @naveenkmahendra5108
    @naveenkmahendra5108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wow great video! In the world of so called professors, just read variables x's y's in their slides and leave their students in sheer confusion, this is how anyone should teach.

  • @zahraazaidan1152
    @zahraazaidan1152 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very clear thanks .I will watch all your videos

  • @AbrarKhan-oq1di
    @AbrarKhan-oq1di 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    In Gaussian noise pdf curve the speediness of the curve occurs from which parameter. Explain the parameter and give details of the curve with help of example.

  • @JohnDuraSSB
    @JohnDuraSSB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    cool!

  • @benlee5042
    @benlee5042 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for sharing! Very useful!

  • @hanarmy3225
    @hanarmy3225 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the video
    I'm your new subscriber

  • @azizulhakimbappy3253
    @azizulhakimbappy3253 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you kind sir.

  • @rudrasingh9501
    @rudrasingh9501 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello lain ,
    intigrator can be also viewed as low pass filter how can we relate this low pass filter operation with the collection of energy (the task performed by intigrator at the receiver)

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      An integrator is not a low pass filter. People sometimes say that it acts like a low pass filter, but that's just confusing, since the gain of the integrator at f=0 is infinity! That's definitely not something you would call a "filter". You can say that high frequencies do not affect the output of the integrator, but that's not the same as saying it is a "filter".

  • @mehmetemin4714
    @mehmetemin4714 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow dude this is solid, keep on

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you found it useful. Any topics you'd like new videos on?

  • @rkmangang7438
    @rkmangang7438 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The integrator ouput is no longer a function of 't'. How do you sample at t = kT?

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, yes, strictly speaking the integrator just keeps integrating, so technically I should have written the integral limits as being from zero (or negative infinity) to t, and I should have used a different variable for the integration variable (perhaps tau). But doing that can be confusing to people who are not so mathematically minded, so generally the integral in the detector is written the way I wrote it - ie. for just the first symbol (which is over the time period from 0 to T).

  • @neetapriyangika3549
    @neetapriyangika3549 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this gaussian shape imply that there's high possibility for lower amplitude noise

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You might like to check out this video about p.d.f.s th-cam.com/video/jUFbY5u-DMs/w-d-xo.html

  • @vaishnav4035
    @vaishnav4035 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation, Gaussian process and white noise comparison video please, is there any connection between those two ideas, please explain sir ..

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the suggestion. I'll put a "white noise" video on my to-do list. In summary though, "white noise" is another way of saying "i.i.d. noise". I explain what i.i.d. means in this video. The reason it is called "white" is that an i.i.d. variable has an auto-correlation function that is an impulse (delta function), which means its power spectral density (psd) is flat. A flat psd means that all frequencies are equally represented. This is analogous to white light, which is made up of equal amounts of all the colours / visible frequencies.

    • @vaishnav4035
      @vaishnav4035 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@iain_explains,
      Sir I have a doubt,we have an iid random variable ,but it has no width in time,it is discrete in nature,in the case of a random variable with N(0,1) we have a white noise only when it is coupled with a continous func,to make to fit all together,other wise we may need to take DTFT to find psd,I'm I right sir,whether my concepts are correct..

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@vaishnav4035 OK, so the be even more precise, the noise in a digital communication system is a discrete time Random Process where the sampling is happening at the symbol rate of the digital signal (and where each sample is a Gaussian Random Variable).

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I've just uploaded a video on this topic which will hopefully help: th-cam.com/video/QfUQMzHfbxs/w-d-xo.html

  • @iamliam1241
    @iamliam1241 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant as always

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. Glad you found it useful.

  • @mallakbasheersyed1859
    @mallakbasheersyed1859 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great one ! But where do we find these insights what would you recommend us to follow(and also what you are following) for these intuitions

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I make my videos on topics that I feel are not well explained in the existing literature/textbooks. You might like to check out my other videos on the channel, and let me know of any particular topics you'd like me to cover, if I haven't already. Check out the full list here: iaincollings.com

  • @miscvids6496
    @miscvids6496 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Voice out put is low

  • @ihsi552
    @ihsi552 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope i can speak english well to understand your lecture

  • @alihsanelmas
    @alihsanelmas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video. I got one question:
    - What about the noise that is added during transmission of the signal? Is it also a gaussian noise?

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Great question. Yes, but since the transmission power is high, the noise at the transmitter is insignificant in comparison, so we ignore it in our models. The receiver only collects a small fraction of the power that was transmitted (eg. in wireless communications it radiates out in all directions), and so the noise in the receiver's electronics can't be ignored. Glad you liked the video.

  • @VADroidTS555
    @VADroidTS555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very well, thank you!

  • @tydengr
    @tydengr ปีที่แล้ว

    Greate video

  • @mrsureshkumarr-psgct7089
    @mrsureshkumarr-psgct7089 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the beautiful presentation. can you make a video presentation on color and white noises? I subscribed your channel

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the suggestion. It's great timing, since I'm just about to make a video on the topic of Noise Power, and explain that all "real" noise is band limited (ie. filtered). White noise, with its infinite power, doesn't really exist (we can't have infinite bandwidth - not until we find a way to have things travel faster than the speed of light, anyway).

  • @qazimashhood
    @qazimashhood 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is therm 'n' actually, is it the frequency, is it the amplitude. I am trying to understand this in terms of DSP though, and one thing more, how can we relate white noise to gaussian noise? Please help me understand this

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for your question. OK, so a couple of things to clarify first: n_k is the "noise" that is disrupting the measurement of the k-th data bit, which is measured at time kT. This is a number. It is a voltage. It is random. It could be positive or negative. Now, in the video I have used "n" (without the subscript) to represent a general n_k (ie. for any value of k). The plot shows the probability density function (pdf) for n. If you're not sure what a pdf is, then please check out the video I made on pdf's (th-cam.com/video/jUFbY5u-DMs/w-d-xo.html). Hopefully that answers your question.

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And "white noise" is another way of saying "i.i.d. noise". I explain what i.i.d. means in the video. The reason it is called "white" is that an i.i.d. variable has an auto-correlation function that is an impulse (delta function), which means its power spectral density (psd) is flat. A flat psd means that all frequencies are equally represented. This is analogous to white light, which is made up of equal amounts of all the colours / visible frequencies.

    • @iain_explains
      @iain_explains  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've just uploaded a video on this topic which will hopefully help: th-cam.com/video/QfUQMzHfbxs/w-d-xo.html