In this video, we show you how some types of SAM radars are limited in vision when they are tracking, giving you a huge advantage over them when attacking.
Since the AI makes silly mistakes (prioritizing the decoy f-16 over the tomahawks), but the technical limitation is real, how would a real life SAM crew handle a situation like this? Because clearly they would know this is an obvious weakness and have a strategy to avoid it. Or is that strategy just having an IADS with multiple SAMs and overlapping coverage?
>Since the AI makes silly mistakes (prioritizing the decoy f-16 over the tomahawks) The AI in Command is very twakable via doctrines so it is possible for scenario developers and/or players to make it more sensible (e.g. not to fire at extreme ranges and/or proritize more dangerous targets over the lesser ones). That is what distinguishes good scenario developers from bad ones in my book. > but the technical limitation is real Yep. That is why every RL doctrime out there since Vietnam war calls for atacking SAM sites from different directions if possible. >Or is that strategy just having an IADS with multiple SAMs and overlapping coverage? Pretty much this.
Keep this coming, mate thanks you.
Since the AI makes silly mistakes (prioritizing the decoy f-16 over the tomahawks), but the technical limitation is real, how would a real life SAM crew handle a situation like this? Because clearly they would know this is an obvious weakness and have a strategy to avoid it. Or is that strategy just having an IADS with multiple SAMs and overlapping coverage?
>Since the AI makes silly mistakes (prioritizing the decoy f-16 over the tomahawks)
The AI in Command is very twakable via doctrines so it is possible for scenario developers and/or players to make it more sensible (e.g. not to fire at extreme ranges and/or proritize more dangerous targets over the lesser ones). That is what distinguishes good scenario developers from bad ones in my book.
> but the technical limitation is real
Yep. That is why every RL doctrime out there since Vietnam war calls for atacking SAM sites from different directions if possible.
>Or is that strategy just having an IADS with multiple SAMs and overlapping coverage?
Pretty much this.
I have a question: is it possible to add a weapon that doesn't exist in the cmo ? For example s-500 ?
First!