Refrigeration with CO2: why?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @lamborghinigl3979
    @lamborghinigl3979 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bravo Biagio and Maria, very nice explanation,

  • @triceratopsamericana2477
    @triceratopsamericana2477 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like this video. Greetings from Los Angeles 🏄.

  • @zcuneaoi
    @zcuneaoi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can I use this video for enlightening people to CO2 refrigerant? I will write credits to this channel in note.

  • @rejimathew8630
    @rejimathew8630 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    which language she speak ? Arabic?

    • @SvenSigi
      @SvenSigi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      italian

    • @hg2.
      @hg2. 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look at the screwing we're all getting because of the EPA and its ozone depletion cr*p!
      The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
      "Holes" in the ozone argument:
      1) Freon is heavier than air: how do molecules heavier than air get to 30,000 feet (the beginning of the stratosphere)?
      2) The "hole" in the ozone over the South Pole was "discovered" by satellites in the '80: if it was just "discovered", how do we know IT WASN'T THERE ALL ALONG ? ? ? ?
      3) There is a perfectly logical reason why there is less ozone over the polar regions: THERE IS LESS SUNLIGHT THERE TO PRODUCE OZONE IN THE FIRST PLACE, especially in winter ("land of the midnight sun...")
      4) Antarctica (South Pole) has the highest average elevation of any continent (8000 ft): Does that have any effect on ozone quantity????? (The North Pole is all at sea level and there is no ozone "hole" there. (Why not?)
      5) The offending atom is CHLORINE (very common), not CFCs themselves. The argument goes that the CFCs carry CHLORINE up to the stratosphere. There are other compounds of chlorine in the atmosphere -- that's one of the things you smell when you go to the beach --> "salt water" --> i.e. sodium-chloride. Is the ocean a source of "ozone depleting" chlorine compounds?
      6) Most basic of all, ozone (O3) is an EFFECT of UV blockage, not a cause. [O3 is an unstable molecule that needs a lot of energy to produce, e.g. the ozone you smell around arcing engines. There is less ozone at the poles b/c there is less UV to generate it (just like there is less sunlight to keep the place warm in the first place.
      I hope the public is beginning to see how dubious this ozone scam is. Monstrous mistakes like this DO happen - think the ban on DDT and malaria deaths.
      The Ozone Scam
      th-cam.com/video/9Szs-treHwQ/w-d-xo.html
      The Nonsense That is Ozone-Depletion
      www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/king.htm+
      Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam:
      In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone:
      th-cam.com/video/lBu3vltczRw/w-d-xo.html
      In other words, the× Montreal Protocol is a complete fraud:
      Min 0:30: "Measurement of SURFACE 'ozone depleting substances' (chlorine? are you measuring ALL atmospheric chlorine compounds?).
      th-cam.com/video/uVeTJSIbGm8/w-d-xo.html
      1987 - Montreal Protocol. Remember that date in this music-tracked piece of manipulative propaganda.
      Listen for the weasel words and disclaimers.
      th-cam.com/video/Ll_TR7C4xr4/w-d-xo.html
      The Ozone hole is "healing" (scientific term). Can't you tell?:
      th-cam.com/video/taTzqRHNIEc/w-d-xo.html
      A discussion of atmospheric chlorine:
      api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2010/3/100310-sea-spray-ocean-colorado-pollution
      Natural Chlorine? You Bet! (American Chemistry Counsel)
      "Many of these chemicals are identical to highly publicized manmade organochlorines: chlorophenols, chlorinated hydrocarbons, PCBs, CFCs and dioxins."
      chlorine.americanchemistry.com/Background-Natural-chlorine-You-bet-/
      Min 7:50 "In the old days, capacitors used to last 10-20 years"
      th-cam.com/video/eGEduZ3EVcg/w-d-xo.html
      7) Min 2:00 Listen carefully: in other words, the ozone hole has been there since AT LEAST the 50s, before CFCs were widely used.
      Min 15:00 "interesting scientifically" - must be fun to have these kinds of research grants and boondoggles. Great work if you can get it.
      th-cam.com/video/AU0eNa4GrgU/w-d-xo.html
      How EPA is screwing up your car's air conditioning.
      th-cam.com/video/wm56tV5BbJk/w-d-xo.html
      Lousy car air conditioning:
      th-cam.com/video/5jKRiDtcBrs/w-d-xo.html
      Guy says we should use explosive propane as refrigerant
      th-cam.com/video/pv_fxOuLuZU/w-d-xo.html
      Propane as a refregerant
      th-cam.com/video/iXyHOfx307k/w-d-xo.html
      .
      Why The Banning Of Chlorofluorocarbons Is Paranoia
      www.ourcivilisation.com/ozone/index.htm
      Min 6:00 -- two different kinds of chlorine... (yeah, right)
      th-cam.com/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/w-d-xo.html
      The stupid claim the ozone layer is "healing" ("healing" - is that a scientific term?)
      Notice that the "hole" always goes away in Antarctic summer (more sunlight/more ozone produced) and reappears in Antarctic winter (no sunlight/no ozone produced (ozone is an unstable molecule to begin with)). We've been sold a load of cr*p that has made a hideous mess of the AC industry.
      You'll see no change in hole size in the Antarctic winter, which means the "hole" has been there all along and is a perfectly natural and harmless phenomenon. "Oh well, we trashed an entire industry over a quack-science hoax... Sorry about that..."
      th-cam.com/video/kyGoqC9FTFc/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/krqHVzF3-T8/w-d-xo.html
      Min 21:00: A brief history of refrigerants R12, R22, R410a and the screwing we get from the EPA, the "Montreal Protocol" (a self-appointed bureaucracy still alive and well) over their ozone depletion quackery. The doubling of pressures from R12 to R22, and the DOUBLING AGAIN from R22 to R 410a,
      AND R22 wasn't even banned for ozone depletion! (100x less "odp" from R12). It was banned for "global warming" quackery.
      th-cam.com/video/V_wUZ4qmAnk/w-d-xo.html
      Min 36:00 Can be charged up to $30 a pound to destroy "contaminated" R22:
      th-cam.com/video/V_wUZ4qmAnk/w-d-xo.html
      Min 7:00 "pre-EPA refrigerants operated at low pressure and only soldered (not brazed) pipe joints.
      th-cam.com/video/G0XOLDHGBmU/w-d-xo.html
      Min 18:00 all refrigerants turn into acid when in contact with water (! ! !):
      th-cam.com/video/kmfAM8kQrjU/w-d-xo.html
      Refrigerants decompose in water ! ! !
      www.answers.com/Q/What_happens_when_refrigerant_hydrolyzes_with_water
      What is hydrolysis?
      th-cam.com/video/G_mT9JI_jxE/w-d-xo.html
      What about the ozone hole and R-12 refrigerants?
      creationtoday.org/what-about-the-ozone-hole-and-r-12-refrigerants/
      Also forgotten is a long list of truly ridiculous claims, such as the one from Al Gore's 1992 book "Earth in the Balance"that, thanks to the Antarctic ozone hole, "hunters now report finding blind rabbits; fisherman catch blind salmon."
      www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/ozone-the-hole-truth
      Minute 22:00 refrigerants disassociate in water, so why sre they a problem in the stratosphere?
      th-cam.com/video/5SpOiHB6VsE/w-d-xo.html
      15% of chlorine in stratosphere is natural, according to this:
      csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/1998/faq3.html
      Another comment I submit to The Order is about "NOISE", namely,
      - NOISE is a bad thing -- we don't want that in our houses.
      - Don't compressors that are forced to operate at higher pressures make more NOISE than compressors that operate at much lower pressures?
      - Assuming the answer to the above is "yes", then would a compressor that has to operate at 450 psi (for that stupid R-410A refrigerant -- 'scuse my french) vs. 150 psi for R-12 (the industry standard till that stupid EPA came along -- 'scuse my french again).
      - Here is a PT graph for the major refrigerants: www.engineeringtoolbox.com/refrigerant-temperature-pressure-chart-d_1683.html
      - Conclusion: the stupid EPA and DOE have not only made AC equipment more expensive to buy and more expensive to maintain and less effective in terms of cooling (window ACs) -- they have also made them NOISIER. ... Thank you, tax-paid idiots of environmentalism and quackery that is "ozone depletion" (the warmup act for "global warming" -- "Hey Texas -- how's that renewable energy/global warming/windmill thing working out????")
      Thank you Boomer generation (mine) for the 60s mess you have made of America.
      Cheers.
      PS: here's a video about a stupid 90% furnace whose condensation overflowed the week before Christmas and trashed multiple ceilings in the guy's house. Of course, those stupid DOE bureaucrats will be there bright and early to fix the damage. "Happy Holidays!"
      th-cam.com/video/DnVtRqfqoSY/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=AntiDIYHVAC
      ... And another video about a screw-up with the INDUCER fan --> a creature of "high efficiency" DOE regulations which dictate the squeezing all so much heat out the combustion, a separate fan needed to get the exhaust gasses out the flu. Then they break down and screw up the whole system.
      th-cam.com/video/SZJ1GPAATGY/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=VintageVideos2009
      90% furnaces:
      "Required".
      Required by whom?
      Are these ultra-complicated and expensive machines cost effective over their total life????
      Or is this another expensive, pointless dictate from bureaucratic petty tyrants making life more difficult for everyone?
      (All I hear about these are those paper-thin heat exchangers rusting through, fans not working, cramped working conditions, more problems with water condensate damage and EXPENSIVE EXPENSIVE EXPENSIVE REPAIRS!!!)
      PS: am big fan of your channel, but have total disgust for the hideous things government has done to this industry.
      ****
      What is ppm concentration of ozone in the stratosphere?
      Answer:
      The peak concentration of ozone occurs at an altitude of roughly 32 kilometers (20 miles) above the surface of the Earth. At that altitude, ozone concentration can be as high as 15 parts per million (0.0015 percent).
      ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/facts/SH.html
      How can a 0.0015% concentration of anything protect us from anything?
      I.e. ozone is another trivial trace gas like CO2.
      ..