The only difference is the valve crank and the bottom of the valve rods right? so you could try changing those if you’ll do another attempt on this one sometime…
Don’t really know lol, maybe because when i’m building a vacuum engine i always think of the vacuum side port as the intake where actual engines get the fuel in from, so logically the other one must be the exhaust :)
@@Möykö-LVE but in this case, nothing is flowing INTO where the vacuum hose is, quite the opposite. Vacuum engines are actually atmosphere engines, the atmosphere poweres them.
That's what's weird about mine. It's literally almost exactly like this. Regardless, awesome job and I'm glad you got yours running!
Yeah, i thought so too… weird…
The only difference is the valve crank and the bottom of the valve rods right? so you could try changing those if you’ll do another attempt on this one sometime…
But you’re welcome and thanks anyway, it was fun trying out a new valve design!
@@Möykö-LVE That’s why I was so confused when it didn’t run as fast…
@@mysefengineering yeah…
Oh and also, The port where the vacuum doesn’t go, if that’s where it draws air in, then why would it be called the ”exhaust”?
Don’t really know lol, maybe because when i’m building a vacuum engine i always think of the vacuum side port as the intake where actual engines get the fuel in from, so logically the other one must be the exhaust :)
@@Möykö-LVE Lol, but I mean, logically, it should be that the exhaust is the vacuum valve and the intake is the other valve.
@@Möykö-LVE but in this case, nothing is flowing INTO where the vacuum hose is, quite the opposite. Vacuum engines are actually atmosphere engines, the atmosphere poweres them.
Yeah, i do get the point, and i do know i might be a little wrong lol, but i’d be happy if you let me call it the exhaust :)
It isn't actually the exhaust but it's easier to pretend it is.