Su 75 Checkmate - Russia's INSANE New Fighter Jet! - Better than the F-35?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.ย. 2021
- Video Sponsored by Ridge Wallet. Check them out here: ridge.com/FNE
Use Code “FNE” for 10% off your order.
My New Podcast: • Electric Jets and the ...
Discord: / discord
New Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
The Cold War of the 20th century between the United States and the then Soviet Union may be over,
but a 21st century arms race continues at full speed ahead between the United States and Russian Federation.
The latter, now depleted of all its former Soviet republics, continues to be a thorn in the side of America’s military aviation industry and its allies.
It’s not by chance that Russia continues to use its famous May Day celebrations to show off its military might and hardware, much as the Soviets did back during the USSR days.
Like any military power, Russia makes a big song and dance of the unveiling of any new aircraft.
Such was the case with a new fighter jet that many aviation experts believe will be a direct competitor to the U.S.’s F-35 plane.
The plane comes with not one but two catchy nicknames, namely the Sukhoi LTS Screamer or LTS Sukhoi Checkmate. The Russians, rather wryly, refer to it simply as the ‘Checkmate’.
Let’s not forget that the Russians are chess masters bar none, so a plane dubbed that does command some of my attention…
Many have noted how the Sukhoi LTS Checkmate looks a lot like the Lockheed Martin-made F-35 stealth jet.
Similarities between Russia’s ‘Checkmate’ and America’s F-35 are particularly stark design-wise.
For example, like the F-35, the Russian Checkmate includes widely-splayed, split-angled tails, a narrow fuselage that houses a single engine, and large wings that are somewhat diamond-shaped.
However, rather than being a case of the Checkmate being a copy of the F-35, these similarities shouldn’t be too surprising. After all, any stealth aircraft is fundamentally constrained by the aerodynamic limitations imposed by having stealth features. One can only defy physics so much.
Further design features of the Checkmate include its cropped delta wing and moveable fins that act as ruddervators, which provide control on both the pitch and yaw axes.
Sharp-eyed analysts felt its most striking feature is its intake, designed as a chin inlet slung under and wrapped around the lower fuselage but with a still-flat underside.
The size of its wings suggest the plane could climb to 40,000 feet or higher, but of course being a … secret project… we don’t know for sure.
Weapon bays for two short-range air-to-air missiles are found at either side of the fuselage, with capacity for three longer-range weapons carried in the lower bay, as well as an internal gun.
The Checkmate can also carry weapons on external pylons for missions not requiring stealth.
The internal weapons bay is designed to carry both air-to-air and air-to-ground ordnance, including both infrared- and radar-guided air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground and anti-ship missiles, guided and unguided bombs
and unguided rockets.
In terms of weight, the plane’s maximum combat load is 7.4 tonnes, which includes a range of air-to-surface weaponry, with a maximum take-off weight or MTOW of approximately 18 tonnes.
As for speed, Rostec claims the plane can achieve Mach 1.8 and can fly supersonically without the use of afterburner,
with an 8G manoeuvring rate. Its powerplant would probably be the engine used to power the Su-57 twinjet.
The Sukhoi LTS Checkmate will have an open systems architecture, with an automated logistics system known as Matreshka, similar in functionality to the systems on the F-35.
Other features of the plane heralded by Rostec include that it will feature artificial intelligence or AI in some capacity, although to what extent and to what end that AI will be used in the aircraft remains, for now, unknown. However, AI will no doubt be used for the plane’s voice-control technology.
Speaking of AI, a Rostec spokesperson commented that both a two-seat manned version and an unmanned version of the Checkmate are being considered for development.
Leaving us to wonder if the future of Russia's airforce will be metal pilots.
![ทัศนศึกษาโรงงานผลิตโค้ก [THAI/ENG SUB]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M9y-TJBNem0/mqdefault.jpg)
Special thanks to Ridge Wallet for jumping in to sponsor today's video. Gotta say, at first I didn't know what to expect but I was sold with just how compact the wallet is. if your in the market, they are best at what they do - get the titanium one cause its just so cool. ridge.com/FNE
First reply :D
Making any video about Forward Sept wings?
This is fake there is only 1 working model, the other crashed when being delivered. As I now there is no worries
There is only 1 working right now, the second crashed when the attempted to deliver it.
Dude, please learn to pronounce Sukhoi correctly....FFS
Also your "unguided rockets" are flares. lol
The animation is reaching Mustard levels of quality
Mustard but upload frequently
I am really curious to know which software its used to create such delicious models , do u by chance know which platform mustard uses ???
@@nebunezz_r not as high quality
@@hchand02 I thinks it's Blender. He told about it once =)
@@fridaycaliforniaa236 thanks 🙏😊
Russia (as well as other vast countries) uses twin-engine fighter jets, as they have to cover long distances and -in case of emergency- the nearest airfield could be far away. Most other countries, though, prefer single-engine jet fighter, so the russians create a single-engine version of their own jets. It's an export-oriented plane, not a backbone of russian forces or something.
Pakistan
They have not dominated for only one century , whenever / wherever , in the long run/historically dominant ,as one civilization disappeared they rise with a new stronger , hence supremacy.
ur absoletely wright
Всё проще мой друг, дело в том что тяговооружённость у совковых двигателей низкая, по этому используют спаренные двигатели.😘 Два двигателя это не плюс, а всегда минус.
@@constantinemalkovich9089 Откуда ты такой не совковый взялся? Два двигателя Су-57 могут выдавать максимальную тягу на форсаже 38 тонн в секунду, тогда как у F-22 только около 32 тонн в секунду.
The SU-75 is a ghost of a fighter, literally! Nobody’s ever seen it for real!
propagranda, talk only no real fact
@@ttkh68thomas43 Fun fact 75 in Su-75 is the amount of years it will take to make one
Я вам больше скажу все знают о су 57 но мало кто знает про як 132 самый засекречиный самолёт РФ
because is a ghost, and Ghost don't exist. Try to fly one, see what happens.
The United States cannot take down a squadron of the Checkmate or the Felon, because neither have the numbers for a squadron.
It's so stealthy that not even the Russian test pilots have ever seen it fly. It perfectly compliments the new Ilyushin super sonic cargo plane that can carry four tanks, and the clear plastic drones that were purpose built to hunt F-35s.
typical Americans who can't see their opponents do well, whats up with the lousy defense systems of America that can not compare with that of the Russians
It is the Russian approach to stealth
The Su-57 also has the same approach, but because it is less stealthy it can be seen flying (very rare but sometimes happens)
calling the Su-57 even some what stealth is a reach, with no RAM (Radar Absorbant Material) and exposed bolts on the wing pannels. Yeah it's an approach but even their stealth fighter can't be made in quantity or even with good quality. let alone the fact that it's radar cross section would be embarrassing to miss.
@@silver_css3734 It has the RCS of a clean F/A-18 Super Hornet; so about ~1m²
At best, is a low observable 4.5 generation fighter, or a very bad 5th generation fighter
The thing doesn't even have functional missile bays... functional for a (theatrically) 5th generation fighter (It is basically the same as a WW2 bomber, not pressurized), so asking it to be as stealthy as any other modern aircraft is kind of asking for too much
Sarsasm...😂
It's made for export. The official trailer for it has pilots from all major non-Western markets being called to witness it.
Its not made, not yet. This is just a sales pitch.
India is not buying ngl
It’s going to be trash. I mean fine for selling around the world but won’t beat F35 or older F22 raptor. Or f16 or f15 for that matter.
@@danielvandermerwe7921 agree russsia dosent have enough cpiital to devlop
@@danielvandermerwe7921 insane agenda 🤣 overrated us
I just get the feeling that this is a modern, single seat, single engine multi role fighter bomber intended to be sold to Russia's Allies and Countries that operate Russian aircraft to replace old end of life Mig-21's, Mig-23's, mig-27's, and Su-22's.
Yeah, only UAE ins't known as Russian ally and operator of Migs and Su
The MIg-21 will never be end of life!
Srbijaaaaa👋
Good option for India to buy these planes in future to replace Old depleting Fighter jets like Mig 21 n Jaguars. 😎👍👏👏👌
you mean iran exactly
One important thing to consider is by the time the SU-75 is ready for full production, the NGAD 6th gen will be as well. Personally, I do not see that as a "Checkmate".
That's assuming that the Su-75 ever even makes it out of the design stage, let alone prototyping / testing.
The NATO reporting name for this thing should be the Su-75 Fantasy, or Su-75 Fictional.
by the time the SU-75 is ready for full production US might not even exist anymore
as the missle said, the 75 in the su-75 is the amount of years it will take for Sukhoi to make a proper stealth fighter.
Hollywood is taking its toll on you my friend
and even tho the 75 is suppossed to be stealth it still uses the IRS dome... which is literally a fucking lighthouse on a radar... meaning its stealth capability is shit... and it doesnt even exist...
@@badi95toinfinity wow wow look whos talking, filled with russian propagannda. Here's a fact, Russia's military is in such a bad state that even though its the second strongest army it cant even defeat ukraine
@@badi95toinfinity also your ass fails to realize that su 57, the apparent russian 5th gen aircraft only has 21 aircraft, and only 11 of those are in service and it took over 40 years for it to enter service, developed 1975, in service 2020 . Whilst the f-35 started development in 1995 and first entered service in 2015, thats 25 full years faster than the su 57 annd it already has over 1000 aircraft in service. So your dumbass needs to wake up and understand that without other buyers russia does not have the capabilities or the requried technology that can rival the US's
India backed out of a potential deal with the SU57, due to technical failures and engine malfunctions. Not what was promised to them.. since no one is lining up to purchase the 57 its program is a failure.. checkmate my a** 😂
The extraordinary claims regarding price, range, combat capabilities, delivery targets, etc.: I'll believe it when I see it
If only the US followed that advice when they funded the F-35
@@Shrew_King It's just an onboard Alexa lol.
it all depends on sales so tbh i believe russian can do it
@@Shrew_King They mention many buzzwords. ;o)
Not necessarily a dig at Russia, I'd be sceptical of anyone making such extraordinary claims
"Can be flown by A.I." Alright, someone get the ace combat protagonists, we gonna need them
nice
i remember that there is a film where a new prototype of plane that was controled by an AI(american) was added to a squad and started to fly by himself
@@philippey4918 It was called Stealth, its kinda meh, but it did have some nice cgi dogfight scenes for the time
Russia cant even get spare part to their computers
@@ulrichkristensen4087 ROFL neither can anyone else. VID 0ne nein really messed thing up globally. Supplies are kinda meh even in the US.
All very impressive, but the SA-32 Thunderbolt Starfury is capable of reaching orbit and operating as a space superiority fighter, as well as being armed with four advanced plasma pulse cannons and has hardpoints for up to ten additional weapons. It's also every bit as real as the SU-75.
It will also fire the “SuperZircon” missile, which flies at roughly light speed and has a KyberCrystal warhead, which can destroy a whole planet. Ask the citizens of Alderaan how real this weapon is…
@@mandoreforger6999😂😂😂
Strictly speaking the SA-32 "Thunderbolt" is a transatmospheric air and space superiority fighter capable of force projection as far as jump gates are available due to its only limitation being a lack of jumpdrive.
@@stephenkolostyak4087 haven't heard of the MiG 41 yet, eh?
Which sci fi movie was that in?
Give me a break, the felon is held together by deck screws and caulking
I think Russian jets look cooler, because of colour choice
Russian jet colors are mostly localized, though they've been trying a similar simple two-tone color on some of their 35 (both Flanker & Fulcrum).
America has a lot of customers on all hemispheres, so they opt to have the simple grey paint that should blend in most skies.
The black bird looks the best
Same
I also love how they blend curves into angles.
But SU75 looks shit,I like SU57 more
Su-75 is an aircraft that surpasses other current 5th gen stealth category fighters by a wide margin: not only its stealth, it even does not exist!!;)
It does exist but its still in prototype up for display it wont be released until 2023
@@NotLRK its not a prototype. Its cardboard mockup
@@NotLRK Sure buddy. The onboard computer will probably run on Windows Vista.
I just made a aircraft to surpass it. It's called the Gfjsye-2548362819643 but no one can see it, top secret
why do americans hate russia so much..? I dont care who is better, this plane is beautiful and I think it will eventually make it to the skies. instead of hating let's try to compete and make better machines, if history thought us something, the most powerful nations always fall while in denial of not being the best anymore.
“Go 2 times the speed of light…” yeah sure
It's August 2023 now. But still no records of a Test Flight for the Su-75 Checkmate...
February 2024 (or January 31st for some people)
Where checkmate test flight?
the worst thing is that im not even surprised, i quickly realized why people call the su75 fe_boy
If Russia is selling this plane to it's trading partners, it's not that much of a threat to the US.
You can say this for the F35 too, But the export models of weapons are always second best, no one sells their best everyone expects this, but whatever we only know what They want us to know more likely what their adversary knows n zero more
Just a way to make money, not a threat.
We should have sold the USSR millions of first generation Ford Pintos.
The Cold War could've ended 15 years earlier!
The f35 was made to fill requirements by the us military and serve as an export platform for their allies. As far as I know, the Russian military didn’t ask for this and may not ever buy it. This is made entirely by the company with intention to export. In some regard it is competition as export products but in reality the customers would be different. US and Russia tend to sell to different countries.
South America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia excluding Japan and maybe South Korea. Sounds like a big enough market.
I'm sure this thing will be as highly successful as the T-14 Armata main battle tank...
They've produced like 10 of them in 10 years.
lol I have a feeling you are correct.
Wow funny come up with something new kid.
@@Darkpara1source? It's top secret info for the Russian defence circles so you as an arrogant teen have no hope of knowing them yet
This comment didn't age well. How are those leopard tanks and Bradley's doing now? 😂😂😂
Looks suspiciously similar to the X-32 Ugly Duckling.
Maybe because physics work the same way in russia and the united states
@@petervrana9625 while that is true that has never caused such a significantly similar design before.
this plane is so stealthy no one has ever seen it and no one ever will
funniest american
My guy the plane is sill in the testing face the first prototype will be made in 2024 to 2025.
@@verdorrenstudios no it won't hahahahhahaha not with all these sanctions. Russia can't make its own complex electronics and absolutely cannot match the west in precision and electronics. Have you seen the Su-57? Unshielded compressor blades, fucking exposed screws and indents on the wings. No shot is that a stealth fighter
why yall taking this man so seriously
@@hospital3568 Cause there saying that not even a model of the plane would even be made.
I seem to recall a certain saying- ‘believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see’
It’s not like they’d admit to being behind.
This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the Poseidon nuclear torpedo. Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.
@@SmotritelMayaka29 I wonder if the horror is more to the point than the actual functionality, though
@@SmotritelMayaka29 A nuclear torpedo is not big deal to develop, a fifth gen fighter in the other hand...
IF IT FLIES within 5 years, they are ahead of the F-35. At least from a technological perspective, as they use tech of today, not from 20 years ago. Again: IF IT FLIES.
@@Gunni1972 But Russian tech is like 15-20 years behind!
The comment section of this video will be...interesting.
*Throws popcorn in the microwave*
The entire section is going to be "'Murica YeeHaw!!".
This is where the fun begins🤣✌
Take a look at the America and Russia fanboys arguing.
Throws a ridge wallet to the popcorn. "Not on my watch, comrade". LOL
FACT
What I seem to notice about the eastern block is that the Soviet Union and Russian Federation has really good designs and concepts for military equipment, but lack funding and proper engineering know-how to successfully make them function as they were internet
Lack of funding? More like politicians went stealing spree
@@hehe-jg8zz and that is definitely true, but at the end of it they would lack the funds
Soviet union doesn't exist, but the russian spirit is great. Theyre starting to build their funding back up after the past destruction of the country.
@@jeremyr7147 hopefully they can pick themselves back up after this, it’d be interesting to see what comes up from the most resilient people on earth
Yup, the best plane in the world means nothing if you can't afford to build and maintain it.
Given current events I'd be shocked if this jet ever flies
Про Авангард Пересвет насколько я помню говорили мультики Путина сейчас не смешно
WhAT events?
In the Checkmates glossy ad they used an image of a RAF 617 Squadron F-35 patch, someone in Russia didn't do their research properly 🤣🤣
The F35 isn't a superiority fight, but a multirole fight.
it shows how shitty your aircraft is when you have to compare a superiority fighter to a strike aircraft 😂
Also a good submarine
@@zerosteel0123A submarine that can fly, is being sold globally, and isn’t a riveted together wooden mockup piece of shit like the last two Russian aircraft.
@@KD-wl3fk 😂😂😂 you guys are funny. Interesting seeing western equipment getting shredded and blown to bits right now. I guess you guys aren't so tough after all.
@@zerosteel0123 Wow, 2 leopards and a couple of M-2’s get destroyed and you guys are shocked? Its war dumbass, stuff will get destroyed. Whats about the mountains and mountains of T-72’s, T-80’s, BMP-1/2’s, and other Russian equipment that has been shredded by basic Javelins and TOW missiles? Does that mean the Russian Army is completely useless? Wait till NATO actually shows up, because you guys will be on your knees begging for forgiveness when your entire air-force is grounded and we are on the doorstep of Saint Petersburg within 48 hours.
USA should be really afraid of those who made this high quality CGI animation
The hawker tempest that will come out in 2032 as the new eurofighter looks a lot like the f22 raptor
In Russia you don’t play chess with chess pieces
*You play with fighter jets*
With fighter jets that exist only as anímations!
@@tombrunila2695 And, this video is ruined.
@@tombrunila2695 the truth
@@tombrunila2695 damn people really hate russian developments, yet they hype the american FA-XX so much (which even the animation itself doesnt exist yet) lmao. cant you just take the joke without having to despise russia?
@@user-xj9lp3fs7m, the only stuff that is being hyped is Soviet/Russia weapons! They are all supposed to be vastly superior, but when the shooting starts they prove to have been expensive targets! And then comes the claim that the Soviet Union or Russia had delivered substandard "export" versions of the weapons to their most important clients! NEVER is there even a hint of that before the shooting starts. Before the claim is that these super weapons will make mince meat out of Western weapons!
And this "new" Russian fighter is a copy of what Northrop had developed nearly 30th years ago!
For the record, that weapons diagram was for the F-18, not the F-16.
US: F-35 first flight: 2006 F-35s produced: 900
F-22 first flight: 1997 Produced 195
RU: Su-57 first flight: 2010 Su-57 produced: 21
so yeah year after release no signs of the checkmate going anywhere i guess
When they build one prototype, they will move on Su86.
Wake me up when it had its first flight...
The Checkmate looks like if you combined the XF-23 and the XF-32
and look at the cockpit of YF-23 and on the wings of YF-22 and compare this to su-57, its simular right? maybe the only original things of su-57 are engines
@@michalc1018 No! They‘ve stolen the engines from Star Wars or from some other Hollywood shit. I think the Russians have also stolen the english language but they reproduced it to cyrilic, that‘s why we don‘t understand it anymore. However, the first thing they‘ve stolen from the US was the Idea of people having a need to breath to stay alive. (Sarcasm)
@@michalc1018 wait what- are you trying to say Su-57 is a copy of...........what the fu- nope not at all doesn't look simular at all
@@BlackPhantom_II Even IF, it couldn't be a "copy". More like a Mash-up, and if someone could pull that off, Congratulations. You solved the "what if"-problem, in Aircraft construction.
YF?
The air inlet reminds me of the American x-32 when they tried air-2-air refueling the refueling thing headed for the massive air intake on the x-32, which was a little bit concerning for the pilot.
It just wanted to take a big sip
I always think this flightier is a perfect match with the Chinese up coming LHD 076, if the Russian mil-30 can be bk on track , then it might become a game changer.
@et9953
Could be.
It would maks a decent stopgap between some of the more outdated late Soviet 4th gen designs of the J-1X series and the more recent Chinese 5th gen stealth designs.
That of course hinges on the assumption that Russia is capable of mass producing the thing and that it lives up to expectations.
Let's see if the Sukhoi Su-73 "Checkmate" can counter an AIM-120 AMRAAM, assuming that wooden mock-up ever gets off the ground.
Ur father is prob as stealthy as ur fave jet “F22 raptor”
@@Lucapanfil At least I have one.
@@enbygaming5996 well y do u never see him? Is it his stealth tech
@@Lucapanfilnever see him? Russian bots are funny
@@RogueSkull Shiver me timbers an ai pfp user.
It's pretty similar to the Boeing X-32B, just less stealthy and I remember when Russia said that the TU-144 was better than the Concorde
It is
@@eliasziad7864 except the Concorde was much more reliable than the TU-144, the Concorde could supercruise at Mach 2 while the Tupolev couldn't, the passenger cabin in the Concorde was as quiet as a normal airliner while the TU-144's was so noisy that passengers had to pass notes to each other, The Concorde had a brilliant safety record apart from a crash that was caused by tire debris from another aircraft while the TU-144 had 226 failures during 102 flights. The only thing the Tupolev beat the Concorde at was speed
Fake Russia military is outdated and old
@@josephmana8972 Same for US army...
@@eliasziad7864your third world country can't even compete against us y'all weak and poor and outdated
Finally Sukhoi provided data about how the new Su 75 can easily destroy an F-35... A Tu 95 loaded with all blueprints and promises of this marvellous plane should have to fly above an airport where there is at least an F-35 landed in the middle of the parking range, very visible. Then the Tupolev -95 would make a landing crash on the F-35...
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This video is 2 years old and the plane has still never flown.
Yeah, meanwhile US has flown 6th gen prototype already... Russia lagging behind as usual.
They will leave a special blank spot on the dash for pilots to mount their commercial GPS units on the 3 production units they will take 18 years to build.
I'll start thinking about being worried about the "Checkmate" when it actually flies.
Twenty years from now.....
For now its just a 10-move setup...
When it flies, Covid-19 probably wiped out human being
Lockheed Martin working on the FR-72.
This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the "Poseidon nuclear torpedo"(Status-6). Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.
No offence, but some bragging the air superiority out of the US with RUS, I immediately thought of Vietnamese using 2 outdated subsonic Mig-17s vs F-4s or F-105s. Migs were always outnumbered by the US in 1:12 ratio , but managed to do so much damage to the US. You can have all the funny gadgets and AI, but pilots are pilots.
Shhh ….. , nobody who watches History Channel knows that….. 😏
Same as Israel six-day war, Israel also outnumbered by the arabs, it is about the pilots
pretty sure its about how you treat your enemies. ive seen many americans underestimating their opponents
@Brian Roome either way the soviet tech indeed did many damage to the us back then (?)
@Brian Roome 1:12 number ratio, 2:1 kill ratio means 1:6 of actual K/D rate, dude. Take some maths. Or in this case, can't swallow the truth against White Supremacist about "the US is invicible" arrogance, you could say.
Su 75 the "stealth fighter" with a double chin
Front reminds me of the Boeing ATF delta wing fighter.
I seriously doubt the US is Afraid of the SU75 sounds like a click bait title to me.
Normal when you are TH-camr ...that's paid advert
You are free to think whatever your doubt doesn't change anything 😜
At USD40 million a piece it just worth it
@@DSM85986 we're really not scared of an imaginary jet
@@Just_A_Random_Desk to me been on your bed for sure you are not but those who will really face it does your response is equally as of my grandmother
Interesting aircraft. In theory, it has very good specs. We’ll see how it all eventuates over coming years of testing.
Russia can't afford this project
@Tylon Holmes lol i love the derailing topic. this isn't about healthcare, Russian healthcare is awful too but unlike russia us can afford 800+ jets without its economy collapsing,
@@tophatv2902 Естественно при таких бюджетах они очень хотят воевать(я про США), и Россия при бюджете в несколько раз меньше всё равно обходит США в некоторых структурах. При таких бюджетах, которые США выделяет на армию в год можно было бы уже медицину бесплатной сделать. Но нет, США будет говорить о том, что им нужна мощная армия на триллионы долларов. Я очень люблю, когда сравнивают Страны по количеству танков самолётов и т.п. Ну много у вас самолётов, молодцы. Системам ПВО России хотяб разогреться дадите.
@@Blackholee-kc4op those air defeenses are gettting rekt by some dudes with bayraktars
@@vignasimp2835 c400 or c500 or 550 ? no
The United States Air Force is so much further advanced than anything Russia has. One advanced F-16 could take out multiple Russion aircraft and they wouldn't even see it coming.
Cap brudda russia fighter jets have always impress everyone especially usa
lmao
@@Heythere12344 according to Russia that is
You gonna get disappointed with F-16 performance in Ukraine
@@MT-rg4fn Put our F-16's in there with our pilots and our Air commanders and you will see the F-16 as anything but a disappointment. You will think it is the greatest aircraft ever made. First like we always do we will take out any possible way of yall being able to detect it on radar. But all that will probably start a new war.
This is a 4.5 generation fighter. The IR done is still round making it highly reflective to radar.
Little correction.. the MAKS Airshow is not every year, it is all two years.
F-35 doesn’t have the highest thrust-to-weight ratio, but its engine sure as hell does. If they can’t beat that, they’ll just have a cool-looking fighter that still needs to hang stores externally.
On empty weight, F-35A Block 3F's T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50/52's. F-35A has an active engine upgrade program.
The F35 is actually underpowered they have a newer engine in development.
@@graham1996 false, For empty weight, F-35A T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50's. You haven't normalised the range between the two aircraft design.
@@graham1996
The basic wing loading without body and vortex lift.
F-35A
Empty weight: 29,300 lb
Wing area: 460 ft²
Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
F-16C Block 52
Wing area: 300 ft²
Empty weight: 18,900 lb
Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet.
F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C.
F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C.
F-35A's 43,000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. There's a reason for the engine upgrade program.
F-35A's 45,000 lbf thrust upgrade road map is 1.57X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. F-35A needs at least 44,330 lbs thrust to preserve 1.55X scale factor
There's a near straight 1.5X scaling between F16C to F-35A on basic wing loading, engine thrust, and empty weight.
F-35A's wing area is influenced by weight growth and F-16C's empty weight wing loading target.
They are working to improve the F135 with 11% more range 10% more thurst and 50% better thermal management. To my knowledge though GE and RR are working on a next gen engine to possibility repower the F35 and 6 gen aircraft.
If you think this is impressive, the Roc, the Phoenix and the Thunderbird fly as well as an SU-75 and are just as real.
Yea I have a literal UFO flying saucer fighter that I built in my back yard. It has the ability to shoot down any enemy aircraft or vehicles, day or night, anywhere on Earth, while still taxing out of the hanger!!! It is completely invisible, on radar and optically, and emits no sound or heat whatsoever. It also has a fully functional recreation area for the crew, with everything from a spa to a gym, and a full kitchen with chef if they should feel peckish at any point. There's even ping pong and pool tables if the crew feels like a little competition, since they won't get any from the enemy. Of course it could do everything without the crew on board, but they just love being on board, and once inside, they're basically in the safest place on Earth, even during combat, because of its impenetrable force field. So even if you could see it, there's no type of weapon currently on Earth that could penetrate this force-field, including nuclear weapons. And best of all, it actually exists in exactly the same way this Russian aircraft exists!! So while this Su75 obviously does exist, just like my UFO, it would be like if an ant tried to attack an Abraham's Tank. It would not make much of a dent.
It looks like they combined features that the suits and stockholders in the military opted out of (YF-23 and X-32/F-32). Will be interesting to see what it's capable of.
Yes that's what I thought
russia found another way to copy homework but not be like china
It’ll be capable of collecting dust seeing as it’s made of wood 💀
@@DiamondSquidy I'm sure it also burns well if they store the wooden mockup indoors
@@ambassadorofreee3859 yeah the only modern jet that’s a cigaret butt away from being deleted from history 😭
The U.S has already produced this tech 30 years ago with F22 and F35 and has been operating both while Russia is just getting started. The U.S is already moving on toward Gen 6 fighters.
I hope our new fighter program produces something dope. I saw the design they unveiled. It looks awesome
F-35 неудача сплошная, а насчёт того, кто у кого ещё копирует это надо посмотреть) натырили чертежи в 90х, радуйтесь, что хоть что-то смогли построить, и то не все...
The Check mate looks pretty neat, its just kinda useless considering its first flight is estimated to be in the mid 2020s and the US is trying to press its first 6 Gen fighter into service by the early 2030s...
Technically 40, the F-117 first flew in 1981.
It isn't intended for the same market. China will be their main competition.
What good is the airframe if you can't source the electronics to make it go?
I’m seeing two elements from the joint strike fighter program and both of them are coming from the Boeing X 32.
The engine intake is similar to the X 32 and it has a Pelikan tail.
Agree. I see it as well. Looks like a stretched, slim down and sexier X32A JSF prototype.
It looks pretty much PRECISELY like a 50/50 mix of Lockheed Martin and Boeing Prototypes. Pretty cool!
Another Russian plane that will never see the light of day
Russia: This new plane will change everything. We will dominate the skies.
Also Russia: We can only afford to make one… out of wood.
The practice of the war in Syria, Georgia and Ukraine has shown that the bastards escape even from wooden Russian planes.
And dry wall screw's :)
@@MrTaramkaya don't forget america lost against fucking farmers in Vietnam and they did not do shit in Korea and they lost in Afghanistan plus ukraine for Russia is going well they are already destroying Abrams and many other nato tanks.
These kinda videos about Russian air superiority didn't really age well...
How?!
@@ncc1701218 because Russia can't achieve it.
@@mikewade777
Do you have Russia today in your country?
@@ncc1701218 you should try a channel that isn't bullshitting you.
@@ncc1701218 wow you're only source that russia Inst making a complete ass of itself is its own propaganda channel. And everyone knows that russia can't afford to build these new vehicles to a scale that would be effective. Why do you think we haven't seen the t14 armada in Ukraine?
0:28
*outer wing pylons*
"stealth"
That doesn't mean it'll have those outer pylons all the time.
Just like the F35
The model was made by this channel so the blame's kinda on them
Stelf
They're made of wood
Someone's is stupid enough to not understand that this was an animation made of su 75 and the plane wont using them when it's on Stealth mode
Too bad they can’t fund the project anymore except for the wooden mock-up model….also did anyone notice the striking similarities to the Boeing X32 prototype that lost to the F35?
Does anyone know the brand of model glue they used?
History is replete with high-flown concept planes that under-delivered...or, by the time the kinks in the system were worked out, their "cutting edge" technology was already obsolete.
So, I'll worry about the Checkmate when it actually moves beyond 'flying prototype' and into actual production. Until then, it's a paper tiger.
Yeah, NATO outmatches Russia and the CSTO in every way.
Same thing happened with the foxbat, they hyped it up so the USA made f-15 just for the foxbat to be a price of trash
Kita bukti kn mlm ini
@AllTradesGeorge
The checkmate isn't exactly "cutting edge" at this point.
Not even for Russia.
It's more like playing catchup with America, at least insofar as their military purpose aircraft exports are concerned.
@@jonblack3807 Wishful thinking
“AFRAID” is the perfect choice word for clickbait but that’s about it.
From the end of the video, it seemed like he was talking about defense contractors being afraid it would take sales away from the f35, which seems reasonable if it is developed quickly and at near the proposed price.
Scared for a virtual jet....hihihi
Su 57 only 12 units and 2 crash so only 10 now
Su 75 ?
J 20 has 150 units so far
J 31 only 5 units so far
F 35 has 500 units worldwide so far ...
You decide....kkkk
@@johnathanclayton2887 30 million dollars is impossible for russia becouse its the same price as j 10 from china
Su 75 is like 70 million dollars for reality check not a virtual one....
Su 35 is 65 million to 85 million dollars to buy so a new jet is not 30 million dollars its ridiculous....
With that chin intake, this looks more like an x32 to me than an F35. Or almost like a combination of both! Which makes sense I guess, they probably looked at both for inspiration when they designed this
Checkmate is a PRO level marketing move. Love it.
Not really. Very amateurish.
. Hostile Pilot
>
Just like all the Russian Pros working in brothels worldwide.
It doesnt look ANYTHING like the F-35. It looks similar to the SU-57, which is the point as it's sharing a lot of tech/design from that platform which keeps its cost low.
It’s like a thinner X-32
Russia has a couple of operational SU-57's. Now their economy is "Check mate", so this design is a paper tiger sales pitch.
@@la7dfa the russian economy now is at its peak high because of gas and oil prices, i wonder where you get your information from
@@amir021idm you mean zhe oil and gas nobody is buying from them
@@lennymegakill9580 when i buy things from the store i can afford whatever i want that’s what important for me, unlike other countries
Pretty insane to build a cardboard mock-up and call it a plane actually.
Is it just me or that the checkmate has a style of its own just like su 57
It looks a lot like the YF 32. The plane that lost out to the F 35.
Because it is...they stole the plans🤯
x-32*, and yes it does. when he said "it looks like the f35" im like, no, that stupid mouth clearly shows its dad is the x-32
Looks nothing like YF-23 , not to mention this is single engine and YF was double engined...
while the X-35 looks like the Yak 141 while this looks like the X-32 minus the big mouth
It does not. It has other wings in different position, another nose. The idea is the same: 1-engine fighter with the smiley face in the front and the pitch-elevators, but the realization is completely different
The name of the fighter aircraft is "Checkmate". The word "Checkmate" originates from Persian "Shah Mat" meaning "King is helpless" and the game of Chess itself originated in India...So, judging by the name the main market for this aircraft will be India and Iran.
well, Russia close friend
undoubtable
It’s not that deep
The checkmate is more of a russian heavily upgraded f16, rather than a f35 equivalent...
Yeah, well on paper MY JET,
the F-U 69 model 420, IS WAAAAAY better than the F-35 and F-22 and even the famous Russian Felon. It has two .50 cal rotary cannons, an automatic napalm launcher and an inside bay that can deliver up to sixteen tomahawks and then Air to Air weapons and of course it's VTOL capable and has all the bells and whistles plus more of all the other planes including an automatic bj machine, a blunt roller and a humidor, and a mini fridge and bar for martinis in combat. And it goes invisible when I press a button. It doesn't have an ejection mode though, the entire jet just teleports back to base right before a missile can hit it.
Let me add a few points regarding this video:
1) MAKS is held once every 2 years, not every year.
2) The Su-75 Checkmate has been in R&D for quite some time, basically developed in parallel with Su-57 and the UCAV «Okhotnik», and they all share quite a lot in terms of design and materials, this is why Rostec is quite confident in its 2023 first flight. Most of the heavy engineering work has already been done.
3) The Su-75 Checkmate aims at export sales mainly, just like the Mig-29/35 used to. The Russia air force doesn't really use single engine fighters, opting for heavier, multi role twin engine fighters.
4) As I mentioned in point 2, most of the R&D has already been done for parallel projects, so I am sure that the AI that will be used in the Su-75 checkmate, will probably be similar to the one, developed for the UCAV «Okhotnik».
5) The cost of the Su-75 will be quite «affordable» in comparison to the F-35 because a sizeable part of the R&D has already been done on the Su-57 program.
6) The relatively low price of the Su-75, along with its quite interesting characteristics, and the promise of adaptability to the buyer's requests, will allow a lot of armies to afford 5th gen fighters, so the list of possible clients is huge. Algeria, Egypt, Lybia, along with other African nations, Syria, Iraq, and other Arab countries, Vietnam, India, Armenia, Argentina, Kazakhstan, Venezuela, etc... Quite a big pool.
None of the NATO countries though, these are tied to the US and are obligated to purchase US planes (the only real competitor to the US inside NATO is France with Dassault Aviation, but they are still working on a 5th gen plane, which might appear in about a decade or so).
Since when have NATO nations been obligated to purchase US planes? What a load of tosh…..
@@andymacmac9151 Since always. Turkey was sanctioned for buying non NATO. You can’t be that stupid.
@@MrRight-fu1gf who is the stupid one…. Try reading my response to the original question, to your comment. NATO nations can buy non US equipment if they want to…
@@andymacmac9151 Yes, they can, with the exception of Russian combat systems.
@@MrRight-fu1gf polish are literally operating migs, they dont seen to buy nato
A very impressive and beautiful aircraft. Unfortunately, it has one problem - it doesn't exist.
All aircraft never existed in the first place.
My thoughts exactly, a scare tactic....they take our old found jets left at bases and reverse engineer them, always behind us.
Well, same was once said for many of the already existing Russia's modern weapons and military equipment, mostly just by some trolls and not real experts. Chances are high to see Su-75 first test flight next year already.
@@otvinta When people speak truth, Russians would call them trolls and traitors.
I'm sure the Soviet Union still exists only in Russia.
@@lauranydb7979 sounds like you love that sweet US propaganda. MUH F22
An F-35 will have detected you and sent a missile after you long before you even knew it was there. It can also fire a missile from any direction, making dogfighting obsolete. It's a 5th generation fighter and does its job well
You are literally arguing about opinion
@@matitjamatheson4395 those are facts. There's nothing about my opinion in there. Learn what the word "Literally" means before using it. You look like a buffoon.
2:45 the similarities between F35 and Su75..
Well, didn't Lockheed Martin bought and improved on a Soviet VTOL jet design? So of course..
Doesn't seem like a lot of exotic technologies. Not including finicky nonsense like making the frame adaptable for multiple configurations, including a VTOL version, can save a lot of time. A standard stealth aircraft body plan by any measure. Even the ruddervators have historically worked with the YF-23, meaning it can be done. Russian stealth has typically been a painted on coating, so less time needed to innovate some kind of stealth material (which they're not promising anyway).
I can see them flying in 2023, at the very least meeting the brief of a 'first flight' with a bare bones aircraft with stealth coating.
Anything can fly by 2023.
2023? I'd give it more time than that. But definitely simplicity is their selling factor if the price is appropriately low as well
Stealth paint is a less effective method of reducing a radar signature as opposed to using stealth materials. Both are known to degrade as time passes.
@@michaelkatz275 I remember a f-35 documentary where a spokesman is saying 70% of stealth is the shape of the aircraft so it won't even matter,but I don't know they might decent stealth coating for the su-57 and the su-75 we"ll just have to wait and watch till it's first flight.
@@newguy954 Yes, in the past that has been true. But now it is less so I understand due to the development of new materials. One of the reasons that the F-35 is limited to Mach 1.6 is that stealth materials have a habit of flying off the aircraft at high Mach numbers.
It would be good to also try to guesstimate the operating costs in a long rung too and not just the purchase price. I do remember reading somewhere when last time we were getting a new fighter jets SU-27 was also considered as low cost option, but they did decide to buy the much more expensive FA-18 Hornet. It turned out in long run to be better option, since the running costs and airframe condition and flight hours would have been so limiting that those Sukhois. They would have been scrap metal like 10 years before the end of life of FA-18's. Not to mention the unexpected Russian political situation, which could change really fast and affect the spare parts availability.
That was when Russia was way more broke
❤su 27 is way more durable than f18 and f18 as everything US builds requires regular maintenance with short intervals in between , su27 is still flying in multiple countries and there was no complaints related to airframe durability or costly daily maintenance . Su 27 was built to be a workhorse and durability with reliability were main requirements in development of su 27. F18 will never outlast su 27 .
@@viking10003318s are flown by airforces that can generally afford to fly their fleet more intensely, give their pilots more hours etc.
The fact that nobody complained does not mean lifespan is shorter. Nobody complains if the aircraft can simply serve it's projected flight hours. As long as you know what you are buying it's fine.
I like how I got an US Air Force ad before this
Its a plywood model sir. It will remain a plywood model until the end of time, because by the time they can make it (if ever) it will have been outdated.
I also drew a pretty impressive plane, I also wrote down some bad-ass specs. I call it the "draw-4".
But you don't have history of building real planes.
)))
Although similar in appearance, the F-35 is also able to operate as a VTOL aircraft which enables it to operate in areas that are more restrictive than many other aircraft are capable of.
We are really comparing apples with oranges here, unless the Checkmate is also capable of hovering as well, then it only resembles the F-35.
It would be much more impressive if it was actually an operative aircraft, but since it has not yet made it to the assembly line, it is premature to be touting it’s prowess.
Thank you for posting these videos!
Please have an excellent and awesome day! ☀️
This is true but only the marine version F35 does the VTOL for use on the smaller carrier/assault ships they use. The B variant. The Navy C and Air Force A models shed that capability to save weight and due to their very different needs and use conventional take off and landing, the C being reinforced for catapulting off carriers. The F35 is a jack of all trades platform. He also mentioned it's an air superiority fighter which it really isn't. The F22 is THE world's greatest air superiority fighter, not the 35. Analogous to the Su-57 class and the F15EX to the Su-35 class in the 4++ category. Navy is gonna be keeping their Hornets for awhile to supplement the 35s.
The fact that it isn't trying to do as much likely will make the "Checkmate" cheaper to make than the F-35 even if it has basically the same abilities as the A Model. Even before considering that there may be less costs of the greedy/corruption type involved, and that they likely have been able to skip on some development due to using the existing F-35's shape as a starting point to work with.
Not sure why there are so many comments assuming that Russia cannot actually afford to develop something at least comparable to the F-35, while just being a one-size-fits-all non-S/VTOL fighter. Look, nothing against the F-35, the things are pretty amazing, but being the first guy to make something (especially if you jam it full of so many brand new features and have multiple variants) will generally make it more costly then being the second guy to make something.
@@WiLDCATZ Since you brought up the F22, I'll just blab my opinion that the F-23 would have been better.
Mike Carbone,LOL! Checkmate is similar to the YAK 141! Which, 30 years later , the United States was able to copy and make F35
@@user-ce2vx7fo6h Really? The YAK-141 is a copy of the Convair Model 200A, down to the P&W designed and patented three bearing swivel nozzle, and the single stage front lift double engines. The SU-75 is a copy of the Northrop MRF-54E (1991-1993). Russia can do nothing but copy, because your gene pool is a sewage pit after the Bolshevik Revolution and WWII.
the 75 in su 75 femboy name refers to the number of years it will take for Russia to build an actual stealth fighter
Just a simple question
How in the hell having air intake in the lower body how one can store weapons in internal bay?
12:56 they decided to replace it with the f-22, then the f-35 and now another f-16. What a great idea, right!
they almost decided to ressurrect the canadian avro arrow and give it some upgrades instead of choosing the f-35, even after 60 years a few upgrades and modern avionics and the avro arrow could easily contend with fifth generation fighters for a fraction of the cost, but uncle sam doesnt like competition, they always pressured foreign countries to not invest or buy from canada and they helped scrap the cl-84 which was canadas vtol craft that the osprey was based on decades later and they also pressured diefenbaker to scrap the avro arrow program which spelled the end for canadas aerospace industry, at that time canada was a world leader and had the worlds 4th largest airforce, were the 3rd country to launch a sattelite into space and after the avro arrow program was scrapped and 17,500 people were left jobless the best of the industry moved to the US and joined NASA and were instrumental in the success of the space program and the moon landing.
Several problems I can see plaguing this aircraft.
IF, and it’s a big if, Russia can pull this off at a $30 million price point, AND meet all of its specifications it claims it can achieve, it will be beyond impressive, considering they have yet to do it with the Su-57, of which only 14 have been built to date (which only have 2 units that are combat-ready, 12 used for training craft), and they have struggled to build even those numbers. Mind you, this hasn’t even flown yet. No flight testing has occurred. They are years away from mass producing this fighter, and it may not even see flight before the advent of sixth-generation fighter jets, which China, the UK, France, and the US are already developing (the US already announcing they have test flown a sixth-gen prototype). It may be outdated before it even leaves the ground. I would be very surprised if it can meet the $30 million price point without making significant sacrifices in capability, or Russia pressing forward, and omitting certain technologies initially promised to bring down the cost. Like I said, they haven’t been able to do it with the Su-57 yet, which is likely going to sell closer to $70 million/unit, up from the $50 million price point initially advertised.
That said, if this is what Russia claims it to be, and they can field it in comparable numbers to rival the F-35, which has over 700 produced as of November 2021, and over a half-dozen buyers, it could be a beast, and a formidable rival. But I’ll believe it when I see it… If I see it. As I said earlier, we’re still waiting on the Su-57, which still has no foreign buyers. And with no foreign buyers, neither program will be a serious rival to the F-22/F-35, or even the J-20.
I'm more worried about what China has, rather than Russia.
The F 35 was better than this with a 45 million price target when it was a concept. Compromises in performance and increases in cost are always part of going from prototype to production. The SU 75 hasn't even reached the prototype stage yet.
Russia loves to announce new weapons and brag about capabilities but their stuff rarely proves it's effectiveness in actual combat. The Russian military is only modern if you count ambitious projects as operational weapons. If you look at what they actually uses, it's all good war era stuff.
And now war with Ukraine has left Russia in a situation where they can't even supply munitions for their troops and anything that isnt assault rifles and ammo for same is almost impossible to produce. All that high tech electronics they're claiming will be a feature are now probably out of reach as the west cuts off sales. I rekkon its dead in the water at this point and even if it isnt lets remember the Tu22, a supersonic bomber capable of bombing the USA from bases in Russia which, if propoganda was to be believed, they'd have 800 of by 1960. I mean, it WAS supersonic...
My thoughts exactly, how is a new entry in the Sukhoi line something to think about when the last one has barely made its mark
Agree. Looks great on paper. Let’s see if it actually makes it past a blueprint. The SU-57 project is going sooo well for them. Lol !!
USA: “Oh no… anyway.”
Yeah… let’s keep Russian aviation history in mind. Each time they’ve announced a tech leap it’s been a lot less when the “announcement” hit the streets.
I’m old enough to remember the Mig 25. Higher, faster and scary. And when a Russian pilot landed, one in Japan and the US took a look at it, it ended up being a POS with a big pair of engines. It could only do that super performance a couple times before they had to replace the engines.
What it did do was spur the development of the F-15 eagle. Which launched in 1976/77 Bitburg, Germany. I was lucky enough to have been stationed near by when that happened.
I would not be surprised if the bark is way worse than the bite yet again.
Visually it looks like a stretched Boeing F-32 , the plane that everyone laughed at . Cockpit , intake , wings, tails ..............................................this is beautiful , hope they build it ..💛💙
Unlike the the F 35 , which is not a single engined F22 , Checkmate is more like a single engined SU 57.
Which will help reduce development time. And it's very much export oriented.
I think of the SU-75 as more like the SU-57 if the Russian Federation had been patient and waited a few more years. They could've had this plane a little later, but they got stuck with the SU-57...now the SU-57 is a great plane and probably better than every 4th gen fighter in the world, but it's not a good 5th gen fighter!
Air inlet sucks in air great from straight ahead,but amending direction amends flo RATE and that checkmate 75 Chyte..ABSOLUTE GOB CHYTE..Like news saying Putin's regime crumbling,these designs are same media swill for dumbies..
@@laynestaley4957 the Su-57 isn't a bad 5th gen, its just not a 5th gen, it has the RCS of a 4th gen.
Why it literally looks like the Boeing x-32 but with smaller smile
Because it's less happy than the x-32, because it won't even get one Prototype 🤣
Imagine making a video like this talking about how capable a wooden mockup of a fighter jet is
Hi, really like your video as usual. But I have noticed one little mistake. MAKS is not an annual airshow. It is organized every two years. Greetings from Russia :)
I hope Su75 it sells like Mig21
@@shimadwan8251 if you havent realized. The Su-75 is technically a stealth Mig-21
@@flogger8413 lol i sure hope it's not any way like a MiG-21 those things drop like flies
Best animation quality I've ever seen. Russia needs an aircraft not only with a high export potential, but also a new carrier-based aircraft. I think the SU-75 is perfect for this role.
But it's carrier is a hunk of junk that needs a tug to go anywere.
They do not have any carriers, the last one sank in drydock
Russian aircraft are only perfect for static displays.
Ah yes, the wooden mockup with a double chin for an air intake
Chess is a 2d game. Checkmate is created on a 2d chess game. Similarly, the 75 will probably stay on a 2d surface without ever flying.
Bruh XD
Small amendment. This aircraft is primarily aimed at selling abroad. For third countries, SU-57 is expensive. Therefore, the manufacturer did not make this commercial project by order from the Ministry of Defense, as usual, but on an initiative basis independently and expressed the hope that the Russian armed forces would also show interest in this aircraft. Be specific in the comments.
The last Stealth airframe Russia built was th SU-57 they had one count it one partner: India. India pulled out and is now buy French Mirage.
India cancelled their Su 57s because they thought they were scrap