@@OneYoungWorld I presume the reason you don't have permission to publish the slides here is because the article they are in is Rockström et al's latest Planetary Boundaries paper in Nature which is behind a paywall. They should have published it in Open Access format, freely available to the public.
Don't worry mother earth and nature is watching humans if they don't stop their more consumption behaviour then we all humans will be punished to hell and you and I don't need slides to watch. We can watch disaster with open eyes, Our Loved ones dying in the flood or hunger or heatstroke in hot sunny days. I am angry to see that some Fossil fuel companies are to blame and humans demand for luxury lifestyle.
Why can videographers not understand that failure to show the graphs everyone in the audience sees is maddening. Johan is cute, but I want to see his data!
I agree with previous comments lamenting the lack of data (graphs etc.) in this video. I have great respect for Johan Rockström, but I am not going to spend time watching a video that does not show that data, so I have switched off about half way through.
"Big world on a small planet" as opposed to the other way around since the 80's I think is a funcntional rethoric and a clear, usable frame in communication and thinking.
The time for mitigation has passed. 99% of humans are just unwilling to make the necessary changes. So the the time for preparation is here, if you want any chance at long term survival.
@@paulgrandy1670 Exactly!! Survive, Preserve, Rebirth---with the knowledge to prevent it happening, again. I'm on a boat, with my destination (after I finish getting le Nonade ready), the Magellan Strait in South America. Warming is half as fast, south of Equator (WMO data, which I've concluded is because the permafrost Methane (4 time normal, measured over Canada and the Arctic Ocean), is less by the time it reaches the equator---which nobody has really expressed, just yet.) Rebirth must start, after Capitalism falls (from its own excesses of constant expansionism), and my conclusion is that the Global North will be such a mess, it can't be reborn there.
@@user-ku2ev4gk1m Capitalism is the politics of property rights. Can a right be excessive? Can you have too much life, liberty, property control, happiness? Answer that.
"...humans are just unwilling to make the necessary changes." How can we "prepare" without change? Why the unwillingness? Could it be because of "The Most Dangerous Superstition" (Larken Rose)?
Yes and Imagine that the temperature has gone up more than CO2 rise can explain. Its almost like something else is driving temperatures and not just CO2. Its almost the same story as satellite data that show no increase in temperature from 1997 - 2015. Did we turn of the CO2 control switch those years? Wasnt CO2 supposed to increase the temp slowly and steadily not with big jumps.
Some heretics say that El Ninjo and the volcano eruptions had something to do with the temperature rise but im sure its only CO2 the pesty little gas that no life on Earth likes.
@@DrSmooth2000 Are you a denier? CO2 is the control knob for temperature thats what they tell us. Most of the temperature rise is due to CO2 they say. Then they are surprised when they discover 700 years old trees under the glacier ice. And here I thought CO2 had been stable before 1900. It must have been a local CO2 rise due to a natural phenomenon that made trees grove where we now have ice.
I appreciate what Johan is saying but something has just Trumped his message. I think it's very unlikely, now, that we will be able to avoid these tipping points. I echo the comments here about the annoying lack of slides and graphs for us to see.
I think HE ultimatelly want' TO wake us. He Want' US to Stop do consum. Or Earth stopped IT, do IT yourself! Big food crises comes!! No one Word about IT!
It up to every individual to make the effort to make a difference. The worlds governments will not for they'd be kicked out of office being replaced by those who will not see the danger only profit. We are totally FORKED or should say our children, their children and all who survive the future will face. There is no if, it's happening now. I'm almost 73 some can remember what was better than most alive today because the worlds weather has always been an interest of mine.
There is a basic conceptual misunderstanding in present politics, who consider the restoration of a climate sustaining life on this planet to be the antagonist of a successful economy. The economy - this term is an ideology-driven generalisation by its own right - will always be favoured by those in power, since their foremost interest is pumping money to the top 10 percent of the richest people on earth. We are effectively transforming the health capacities of this world into - in a purely materialistic sense - worthless digits on bank accounts. But in reality, the direct cause of inhabitable conditions and exponentially increasing damage done by catastrophes such as floodings etc. will automatically result in economic collapse, de-valuating all the digits in ther accounts and finally fully obliterating all the sacrifices the working people have made without equally profiting. If we do not change course, humanity will go extinct because stopping climate change was cost-inefficient and the richest could not make good profit from it. What a world we live in. Thinking reversely, rescuing this planet also means rescuing the economy, which in turn should be worth some effort, shouldn't it?
It is terrible that we now know how to fix it but due to political powers and their shortsightedness, we are unwilling to do so.. so now what? It is maddening to see the results of this election, knowing that the climate is not something they even want to consider.
I think something like 90% of humanity has a smartphone, a cell phone, or a landline phone. Some people have more than one. The best use of language models would be to act as a conversational interface between people and a digital representation of the knowledge and sentiment expressed by people during phone conversations with a global platform for collective problem solving. Decisions to be made not by the top 1% and their minions, but through collective terrestrial intelligence.
We are primates, driven onto the ground, ran into fire to escape predators for protection. Our species adapted to fire, lost our fur and walk bi pedal carrying fire wood. Fire and humans are inseparable. Using fire doesn't make us smart. We didn't discover fire anymore than the deer discovered the forest or the fish discovered water. Fire is an environment. Fire is dangerous. Our species is not very old. Extinction is commonplace.
Many people are complaing about the lack of slides. The reason is that they don't have permission to publish the slides here is because the article they are in is Rockström et al's latest Planetary Boundaries paper in Nature which is behind a paywall. They should have published it in Open Access format, freely available to the public.
Nice flowery language, and paints a lovely picture of the earth with us being evil. I'd suggest people watch Paleoclimatology presented by Roger Palmer. Long, but puts things into perspective. By the way from the 1950's is when irrigation was increased dramatically and water vapour is a much more potent greenhouse gas then CO2. There is nothing to suggest we are ruining the planet, greening has increased and nothing is inconsistent with past changes - when we had no conceivable influence. Life thrived in warmer times.
Co2 does have an affect on infrared radiation but it t is demonstrably small. Doubling the level of atmospheric co2 will have a negligible affect on warming. Research papers by Prof William Happer. The abrupt acceleration in earths warming does coincide with our industrial growth. But co2 is not the main culprit, it must be due to something else we are doing.
@@milanp7825 and the vid with the scantily clad woman or jocks driving a golf cart into a lake as they laugh get 3 million. These are the times. Time to start preparing.
TEDX without the requisite visual aids…or any recognizable definition of terms. For example:”The freshwater cycle is the fundamental glue that connects all life on Earth.”
Proves that our ball of rock is in its own right is a living organism. In relative terms we have disrupted it biocycle. It's not hard to grasp the concept of all the organisms on its land and oceans depend on its natural cycles and evolution has time to adapt.
What unadulterated tosh! For a start, what is the "perfect" climate that we need to restore the Earth to? All the observations that we have show that there is nothing, whatsoever, for us to be alarmed about, we are, unequivocally, *NOT* in any danger, at all, apart from persons like this, through either their own ignorance, or - worse - a wilful mis-presentation of the known facts.
Alberta and Texas have differing approaches to "clean energy" because their politicians have different motives . When politicians are excluded from controlling other people's property, the most efficient usage will be quickly found. Why? It won't be based on short-term, destructive, hidden agendas of politicians/crony interests. But, less control does NOT mean freedom, rights. It only means less disruption, less corruption, less economic failure. A totally freed up market would generate extreme wealth, undreamed of by advocates of socialism. So, what do you want, perpetual broken political promises or Capitalist prosperity? It's your choice to "live & let live" or ask others to force everyone to obey their dictates. Think carefully. It's your life but you can give it to others and trust them not to sacrifice it for their own benefit.
"Doesn't he know that without Mr Man's hockey stick graph there would be no climate crisis to most" Over two dozens climate reconstruction studies since Mann's paper have proven he was right. And thousands of other studies reveal how rapid man-made global warming is harming people and the planet.
This human behaviour could easily flip to an economy designed specifically to enact those proposals. When you just look at it, it's obvious why the mistaken interpretation of defense, in tune with mother Earth's ecological circumstances, is instead, an all-out attack on the unshielded economic vulnerabilities.
People talking about climate change need to understand the importance of costly signals. If we see politicians swearing never to get on a plane again, the rest of us might start to believe that they are serious. But they are not changing their lifestyles at all, so it looks like talk of climate change is just a tool to oppress ordinary people.
This expert has been saying that we can become sustainable and reach the world climate goals for years and years. Still, the numbers state the we, year by year, are going more in the opposite direction. Come on Johan, please be honest with us. Do you really, really belive that we can become sustainable through a smooth transition.
Sorry I'm not interested in seeing shots of adoring fans who may or may not have been there. Graphs etc would be useful. Stopped watching before the end.
please remove yourself from your house,meat ,fish,,car,holydays,democracy,free choice,animals,flights,internet,comp'uters,free mobility,acces and use of nature and much more,(all unsustainable) as an example for the non rich citicens ,that your agenda expropiates in salami-tactics with,legislation ,raising prices by(co2)taxes,energy-prices,building laws,land-management,transportation and spatial planning,limit reductions.
@@violetphase you don’t know anything the Earth is currently in a major ice age has been for 2.6 million years it’s extremely cold today 99% of the last 245 million years were warmer than today CO₂ is necessary for photosynthesis 6H₂O + 6CO₂ => C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6O₂ without CO₂ there would be no plants without plants, there would be no animals
We are working on a version with the slides which will be available when we have permission to make them publicly available in the coming months. 🙌
@@OneYoungWorld I presume the reason you don't have permission to publish the slides here is because the article they are in is Rockström et al's latest Planetary Boundaries paper in Nature which is behind a paywall. They should have published it in Open Access format, freely available to the public.
It's a good presentation but it would have been nice if the video had shown his slides instead of always focusing on him or on the audience.
See above
Don't worry mother earth and nature is watching humans if they don't stop their more consumption behaviour then we all humans will be punished to hell and you and I don't need slides to watch. We can watch disaster with open eyes, Our Loved ones dying in the flood or hunger or heatstroke in hot sunny days. I am angry to see that some Fossil fuel companies are to blame and humans demand for luxury lifestyle.
Why can videographers not understand that failure to show the graphs everyone in the audience sees is maddening. Johan is cute, but I want to see his data!
He supposed you know Its.
Copyright?
Amazing talk, loved to have seen the graphs
Why no slides? 🤦♂️
I agree with previous comments lamenting the lack of data (graphs etc.) in this video.
I have great respect for Johan Rockström, but I am not going to spend time watching a video that does not show that data, so I have switched off about half way through.
Where are the graphs Dr. Rockström is talking about? This video is useless without them. Editor 👎👎
He do his climate work decade.
You don't know thé conclusions??
So study IT.
Please post this again with the slides 😊
"Big world on a small planet" as opposed to the other way around since the 80's I think is a funcntional rethoric and a clear, usable frame in communication and thinking.
The time for mitigation has passed. 99% of humans are just unwilling to make the necessary changes. So the the time for preparation is here, if you want any chance at long term survival.
@@paulgrandy1670 Exactly!! Survive, Preserve, Rebirth---with the knowledge to prevent it happening, again.
I'm on a boat, with my destination (after I finish getting le Nonade ready), the Magellan Strait in South America. Warming is half as fast, south of Equator (WMO data, which I've concluded is because the permafrost Methane (4 time normal, measured over Canada and the Arctic Ocean), is less by the time it reaches the equator---which nobody has really expressed, just yet.)
Rebirth must start, after Capitalism falls (from its own excesses of constant expansionism), and my conclusion is that the Global North will be such a mess, it can't be reborn there.
@@user-ku2ev4gk1m Capitalism is the politics of property rights. Can a right be excessive? Can you have too much life, liberty, property control, happiness? Answer that.
"...humans are just unwilling to make the necessary changes." How can we "prepare" without change? Why the unwillingness? Could it be because of "The Most Dangerous Superstition" (Larken Rose)?
Should be noted that the average temperature rise for the last 12 months is 1.64C
Yes and Imagine that the temperature has gone up more than CO2 rise can explain. Its almost like something else is driving temperatures and not just CO2. Its almost the same story as satellite data that show no increase in temperature from 1997 - 2015. Did we turn of the CO2 control switch those years? Wasnt CO2 supposed to increase the temp slowly and steadily not with big jumps.
Some heretics say that El Ninjo and the volcano eruptions had something to do with the temperature rise but im sure its only CO2 the pesty little gas that no life on Earth likes.
@@bonkbonk2670 more than CO2 doesn't mean CO2 is not a factor 👩✈️
@@DrSmooth2000 Are you a denier? CO2 is the control knob for temperature thats what they tell us. Most of the temperature rise is due to CO2 they say. Then they are surprised when they discover 700 years old trees under the glacier ice. And here I thought CO2 had been stable before 1900. It must have been a local CO2 rise due to a natural phenomenon that made trees grove where we now have ice.
I appreciate what Johan is saying but something has just Trumped his message. I think it's very unlikely, now, that we will be able to avoid these tipping points.
I echo the comments here about the annoying lack of slides and graphs for us to see.
I think HE ultimatelly want' TO wake us.
He Want' US to Stop do consum.
Or Earth stopped IT, do IT yourself!
Big food crises comes!!
No one Word about IT!
It up to every individual to make the effort to make a difference. The worlds governments will not for they'd be kicked out of office being replaced by those who will not see the danger only profit. We are totally FORKED or should say our children, their children and all who survive the future will face. There is no if, it's happening now. I'm almost 73 some can remember what was better than most alive today because the worlds weather has always been an interest of mine.
There is a basic conceptual misunderstanding in present politics, who consider the restoration of a climate sustaining life on this planet to be the antagonist of a successful economy. The economy - this term is an ideology-driven generalisation by its own right - will always be favoured by those in power, since their foremost interest is pumping money to the top 10 percent of the richest people on earth. We are effectively transforming the health capacities of this world into - in a purely materialistic sense - worthless digits on bank accounts. But in reality, the direct cause of inhabitable conditions and exponentially increasing damage done by catastrophes such as floodings etc. will automatically result in economic collapse, de-valuating all the digits in ther accounts and finally fully obliterating all the sacrifices the working people have made without equally profiting. If we do not change course, humanity will go extinct because stopping climate change was cost-inefficient and the richest could not make good profit from it. What a world we live in. Thinking reversely, rescuing this planet also means rescuing the economy, which in turn should be worth some effort, shouldn't it?
@@LemauriceL & Trump will only hasten our demise
What is the value of 'economy'?
There is a need for bread and so....
Well said - exactly right!
@@gehwissen3975 there is only a need for bread if there are are humans ... :(
👁️👈☝️
You need to fire your videographer! I stopped watching when I couldn't see the slides and saw the audience instead.
It is terrible that we now know how to fix it but due to political powers and their shortsightedness, we are unwilling to do so.. so now what? It is maddening to see the results of this election, knowing that the climate is not something they even want to consider.
I think something like 90% of humanity has a smartphone, a cell phone, or a landline phone. Some people have more than one.
The best use of language models would be to act as a conversational interface between people and a digital representation of the knowledge and sentiment expressed by people during phone conversations with a global platform for collective problem solving. Decisions to be made not by the top 1% and their minions, but through collective terrestrial intelligence.
they're considering it for sure. Drumpf was pissed that the U.S. military considered global warming to be real.
@johnkintree763 maybe but how many of the billions don't start at home and sort,compost their household waste?
We are primates, driven onto the ground, ran into fire to escape predators for protection. Our species adapted to fire, lost our fur and walk bi pedal carrying fire wood. Fire and humans are inseparable. Using fire doesn't make us smart. We didn't discover fire anymore than the deer discovered the forest or the fish discovered water. Fire is an environment. Fire is dangerous. Our species is not very old. Extinction is commonplace.
We don't know. We just say we know how to.
We avoid hysteria. That's all.
I can't share this because it does not show the graphs.
I’ve been teaching this since the 1980s
Many people are complaing about the lack of slides. The reason is that they don't have permission to publish the slides here is because the article they are in is Rockström et al's latest Planetary Boundaries paper in Nature which is behind a paywall. They should have published it in Open Access format, freely available to the public.
where can we get the slides? I have likely seen the slides is various other presentation by Johan Rockstrom.
Begins with stopping animal agriculture and consumption of animals. The damage is detrimental among other things
The laws of physics and thermodynamics are merciless. Emissions at unseen highs growing faster than ever
Can we restore earth's climate? Simply put - No.
For the last ten years we can still save the earth but al indicators pointing the opposite.
This is hopium. Emissions increase each year and the rate temperature change is increasing. These are facts.
Don't mistake Rockström for Rahmstorf. I thought he was Rahmstorf - hence the comment.
thermodynamics is a non reversible process so we need to act smart right now
too old to care- party now-
sooner of later,
we're all going to die
always look on the bright side of life . . .
Nice flowery language, and paints a lovely picture of the earth with us being evil. I'd suggest people watch Paleoclimatology presented by Roger Palmer. Long, but puts things into perspective. By the way from the 1950's is when irrigation was increased dramatically and water vapour is a much more potent greenhouse gas then CO2. There is nothing to suggest we are ruining the planet, greening has increased and nothing is inconsistent with past changes - when we had no conceivable influence. Life thrived in warmer times.
Co2 does have an affect on infrared radiation but it t is demonstrably small. Doubling the level of atmospheric co2 will have a negligible affect on warming.
Research papers by Prof William Happer.
The abrupt acceleration in earths warming does coincide with our industrial growth. But co2 is not the main culprit, it must be due to something else we are doing.
@@sychodefender rubbish comment. Are you paid by oil industry?
@@CH-et4go William Happer is a known shill for the fossil fuel companies.
Ah yes, random strangers, that’s what I came here to see 🙄
500 looks in 2 days. No one cares, we're scr...
@@milanp7825 doesn't matter the views, we do not have the intention to solve it.
That attitudes attitude helps no one maybe no more share that despare.
The problem isn't really the topic. People have become spoiled with catchy videos, with colorful visuals and more animated presentation.
@@milanp7825 and the vid with the scantily clad woman or jocks driving a golf cart into a lake as they laugh get 3 million. These are the times. Time to start preparing.
TEDX without the requisite visual aids…or any recognizable definition of terms. For example:”The freshwater cycle is the fundamental glue that connects all life on Earth.”
why so much focus on the audience?
Proves that our ball of rock is in its own right is a living organism. In relative terms we have disrupted it biocycle. It's not hard to grasp the concept of all the organisms on its land and oceans depend on its natural cycles and evolution has time to adapt.
Seriously. What are we going to do about it? I know most will say “nothing” but that’s the wrong answer.
Why didn’t they show any of the graphics ???! Why did we need go see that random group of humans??? This is annoying af
What unadulterated tosh! For a start, what is the "perfect" climate that we need to restore the Earth to? All the observations that we have show that there is nothing, whatsoever, for us to be alarmed about, we are, unequivocally, *NOT* in any danger, at all, apart from persons like this, through either their own ignorance, or - worse - a wilful mis-presentation of the known facts.
Downvote because of not showing the graphs.
I love Johan Rockströms presentations but I need the graphs!
🎧🎧🎧🎧🎧🎧🎧
Wrong. Are you paid by ffi?
A BIG NO
Alberta and Texas have differing approaches to "clean energy" because their politicians have different motives . When politicians are excluded from controlling other people's property, the most efficient usage will be quickly found. Why? It won't be based on short-term, destructive, hidden agendas of politicians/crony interests. But, less control does NOT mean freedom, rights. It only means less disruption, less corruption, less economic failure. A totally freed up market would generate extreme wealth, undreamed of by advocates of socialism. So, what do you want, perpetual broken political promises or Capitalist prosperity? It's your choice to "live & let live" or ask others to force everyone to obey their dictates. Think carefully. It's your life but you can give it to others and trust them not to sacrifice it for their own benefit.
Exactly who do I have to be respectful towards, because of the election of Donald Trump the Earth is doomed, is that being disrespectful or honest.
@@grahamlindsay1263 neither of the choices mentioned
New Year's Eve is coming = more pollution from fireworks 🎆, noise for already stressed out wildlife, could humans be anymore selfish?
Doesn't he know that without Mr Man's hockey stick graph there would be no climate crisis to most.
"Doesn't he know that without Mr Man's hockey stick graph there would be no climate crisis to most" Over two dozens climate reconstruction studies since Mann's paper have proven he was right. And thousands of other studies reveal how rapid man-made global warming is harming people and the planet.
I thought the ice sheets have been at the same level since 2007?
2007 and 2012 were record low Arctic sea ice extents, so technically above the lowest ever since
👁️👈☝️
This human behaviour could easily flip to an economy designed specifically to enact those proposals.
When you just look at it, it's obvious why the mistaken interpretation of defense, in tune with mother Earth's ecological circumstances, is instead, an all-out attack on the unshielded economic vulnerabilities.
People talking about climate change need to understand the importance of costly signals. If we see politicians swearing never to get on a plane again, the rest of us might start to believe that they are serious. But they are not changing their lifestyles at all, so it looks like talk of climate change is just a tool to oppress ordinary people.
This expert has been saying that we can become sustainable and reach the world climate goals for years and years.
Still, the numbers state the we, year by year, are going more in the opposite direction.
Come on Johan, please be honest with us. Do you really, really belive that we can become sustainable through a smooth transition.
1:47 "Solar voltaics" is certainly not a natural phenomenon :)
The paleoclimate deniers are posting videos like crazy.
I am not a child
You're a big boy!
These perspectives are heartbreaking. Action was too little and too late. To see politics nowadays is desperating
Sorry I'm not interested in seeing shots of adoring fans who may or may not have been there. Graphs etc would be useful. Stopped watching before the end.
please remove yourself from your house,meat ,fish,,car,holydays,democracy,free choice,animals,flights,internet,comp'uters,free mobility,acces and use of nature and much more,(all unsustainable) as an example for the non rich citicens ,that your agenda expropiates in salami-tactics with,legislation ,raising prices by(co2)taxes,energy-prices,building laws,land-management,transportation and spatial planning,limit reductions.
The Arkists are coming!
Answer: NO
Nope, not a chance.
Its currently one of the coldest periods in all of earth's history. Just mind your own business.
No
The climate has never been stable.
@@bentfpv google ”holocene”
Why do you say that?
People are dying because of oil industry emissions. Don't you care?
both global warming and
higher levels of CO₂ would
benefit the biosphere
the Earth is too cold and
CO₂ is a nutrient
You're an idiot.
Exxon Mobile can you please stop spamming this nonsense everywhere we know it's not true
@@violetphase
you don’t know anything
the Earth is currently in a major ice age
has been for 2.6 million years
it’s extremely cold today
99% of the last 245 million years were warmer than today
CO₂ is necessary for photosynthesis
6H₂O + 6CO₂ => C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6O₂
without CO₂ there would be no plants
without plants, there would be no animals