Exhaust Back Pressure - Dyno tested

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ต.ค. 2021
  • Increasing exhaust back pressure via a restriction and the effect on power
    Get merch:
    garage4age.digitees.co.nz - NZ - AU - Global
    garage4age.creator-spring.com - Global
    Test engine:
    Long rod 4AGE
    Modified early bigport head
    Kelford 193b 9.2/8.5mm 284/278 @ .3mm
    Toda valve springs
    Toda inlet cam gear
    Redtop bigport block with 10.3:1 smallport pistons
    Toda 3.7kg flywheel
    Maxpeedingrods connecting rods
    Link G4 ecu
    47mm itb long runner
    Garage4age Header and 3" exhaust
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 448

  • @Garage4age
    @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    Remember this is only exhaust pressure. There is a whole lot of wizardry that goes on in the headers and the section after the collector. That needs to be tuned correctly to make good power. not just "make it big" . After said parts is what this video is about.

    • @mateuszbarya9098
      @mateuszbarya9098 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      In motorcycles, such valve is sometimes used to improve the torque in the lower rev range (e.g. yamaha uses exup)

    • @jarripotero8535
      @jarripotero8535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mateuszbarya9098 Yes, I own a Kawa ZX10r ´04 and has it, but years ago a red light was on in dash, after check with a wire to ground and read the code that exhaust valve was KO, was closed, removed the cables and blocked the valve in open position. Purchased new my bike, has 141.800Km, never engine valve adjustment made.

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Since the valve is close ish to merge. might have some effect on scavenging. good chance its there for noise and/or emissions stuff also. The section I was talking about that needs to be right is basically the length of motocycle exhaust.

    • @tortron
      @tortron 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      all im hearing is 3" straight through

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@tortron your hearing is perfect

  • @richardbossman9875
    @richardbossman9875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +240

    You never need “back pressure”, what you need is efficient exhaust scavenging for the rpm you plan to run at.

    • @jeremypike9153
      @jeremypike9153 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Back-pressure is an indication of inefficiency. The reason why factory exhaust systems have back pressure is that it aids in noise suppression.

    • @andynixon2820
      @andynixon2820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Exactly , with a multi cylinder engine you require spent exhaust gases to be sucked out by the vacuum from one or the other cylinders via a coupled exhaust system. Except with supercharged engines that can run separate pipes.
      Don't need and back pressure at all , it jumps reduces power .

    • @jackdaniels2657
      @jackdaniels2657 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So u need back pressure.

    • @joshuabrown9398
      @joshuabrown9398 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@jackdaniels2657 no you need scavenging

    • @jackdaniels2657
      @jackdaniels2657 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshuabrown9398 OK so if u just run a dragster without an exhaust ur saying u will get more power. Then dragster like top fuel should ditch those exhaust all togeather

  • @wbgh008
    @wbgh008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +284

    Far too many people confuse back pressure with exhaust scavenging. When you go too large on an NA exhaust you are not losing "back pressure" you are making the exhaust scavenging less efficient, because the exhaust diameter is too large for the flow of gas to produce a vacuum on adjacent exhaust runners. And if someone is telling you your turbo car needs back pressure, get better advice

    • @jadz684z
      @jadz684z 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      And like that we all learned something today

    • @Chris-yy7qc
      @Chris-yy7qc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Exactly. No engine needs backpressure. But proper scavenging and also resonance is key to making power.
      People confuse that, because when they make their exhausts less restrictive (by changing their exhaust and/or remove mufflers) they lowered the backpressure (which is good). But also changed the scavenging and/or the resonance. If the car makes less power in the end they blame it on the backpressure. But the reason for the power loss is the messed up resonance tuning / the scavenging not working properly anymore.

    • @tonybaldwin7149
      @tonybaldwin7149 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Yes, do not confuse backpressure with exhaust gas velocity. The exhaust scavenging effect relies on the momentum of the exhaust gasses.

    • @lucaseaston
      @lucaseaston 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@Chris-yy7qc 2 strokes need back pressure ;) But we get what you mean.

    • @scottmcqueen3964
      @scottmcqueen3964 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Back pressure in a turbo can generate more kinetic energy in the turbo, but it obviously has the downside of restricting flow.
      I'm not tuner or anything, its just some general thermodynamics principles.

  • @ShortysTRM
    @ShortysTRM 2 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    I hardly ever comment on TH-cam, but I always like to tell you how much I enjoy what you do. It's like watching all the stuff that runs through my head come alive. Great, simple illustration of backpressure. Keep doing what you do. Also, I swear that car gets better looking every time I see it.

  • @X7rocks
    @X7rocks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Your editing keeps getting better and better.

  • @walterschmidt5464
    @walterschmidt5464 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These videos are great. Short, informative and straight to the point. Great work.

  • @keatonjones6115
    @keatonjones6115 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I dont even need to see the vid to like it already, you always do such good real world tests that are actually mostly unanswered thanks my dude!

  • @plamenpavlov8943
    @plamenpavlov8943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Greetings from Bulgaria and keep going with good content!The limit for back pressure is arround 3-4 psi(0,25-0,30 bar).Everything above is causing losses or "disturbancies in the force" :) and it is clearly seen here.

  • @MrMightyytau
    @MrMightyytau 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a simple and effective test and as simple as that test is this is the best test I have seen showing the difference in back pressure. All the other are just changing the size of the muffler and HP difference.

  • @AiToR51
    @AiToR51 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Good video for backpressure lovers hahahahah. Of course there will be a optimized exhaust diameter/gas speed for each setup.

  • @madhut3042
    @madhut3042 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Less pressure, more gases out, More gases out more in, more gases in equals more power... People keep telling me my car is going to burn valves with my resonator only exhaust. Don't know why its always old folks who tell me this but if the air fuel ratio is correct i dont think i need to worry. Btw love your vids man there's so much effort put imto these short vids. 👍

    • @bigblockjalopy
      @bigblockjalopy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Correct, if the AF ratio is right but carbed cars can lean out with a less restrictive exhaust system but I have never seen burned valves because of straight pipes w/o adjustment.

    • @devl547
      @devl547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Some modern cars (like Hyundai or Kia) with downscaled pistons and rings actually need SOME back pressure from stock catalytic converter. If removed, the engine starts to burn oil a lot.

    • @m.b.82
      @m.b.82 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Its more about resonances and velocities than anything else

    • @oscarzt1652
      @oscarzt1652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah i mean having too low of ignition timing is more likely to burn valves

    • @kensmechanicalaffair
      @kensmechanicalaffair 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@devl547 Most vehicles need some backpressure.

  • @Loopyengineeringco
    @Loopyengineeringco 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think this is my fave channel on youtube & I might actually buy a t-shirt (I never buy merch ever). No BS intro/outro, no honeydicking "YOU WONT GUESS WHAT THIS MOD DID". Just pure awesome

  • @ProfessorOzone
    @ProfessorOzone 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much for finally testing this. The next time someone tells me, "You need a little back pressure in your exhaust," instead of just shaking my head, I'll shake my head and refer them to this video.

  • @CardizoneSemblance
    @CardizoneSemblance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    *Old man shakes fist at Garage 4AGE*

  • @scattkiwiman
    @scattkiwiman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good video ! never talk about backpressure but about optimum flow !

  • @smoothrider900
    @smoothrider900 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes ! Another great video as always !!!! 💪💪💪

  • @davej6222
    @davej6222 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Love the exhaustive testing.

    • @roman3s
      @roman3s 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      under rated comment.

  • @davidbeer
    @davidbeer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You've been a very busy 🐝 thanks for all the info dude😀

  • @J3n555
    @J3n555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your content man. And the memes are awesome

  • @sjorsdewit9394
    @sjorsdewit9394 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m actually suprised that there is such a big difference in performance between 0.9 and 0.4 psi. Nice video!

  • @butterbiskit999
    @butterbiskit999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I imagine you having a huge set of spread sheets with all these things you test so when you build a motor then set it up you could hypothetically select all the favorable parameters/components to have a tip top 4age. That would be pretty silly, in a cool way.

  • @Tony-montana-666
    @Tony-montana-666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for you testing. Very good channel

  • @Fiatfan
    @Fiatfan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This channel is so good

  • @gfarnden56
    @gfarnden56 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Changed my exhaust from 2.5 inch to 4 inch and boost went up 4 psi on average... nice!

  • @lauriedooker1031
    @lauriedooker1031 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent demonstration, thanks.

  • @joseignaciomunozsalazar4980
    @joseignaciomunozsalazar4980 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super grateful fot the videos!!

  • @jarripotero8535
    @jarripotero8535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Again, super video.

  • @conniekahl8015
    @conniekahl8015 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done! Pretty much says it all. Keep On!

  • @Lofi.z34
    @Lofi.z34 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man that car sounds GOOD

  • @Jack-qn4vt
    @Jack-qn4vt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow, even tiny amounts of backpress make a difference!
    Great work Mr 4age

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Yup. The more cam overlap, the more sensitive to exhaust pressure. stock engine will get away with more.

    • @Jack-qn4vt
      @Jack-qn4vt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Garage4age very interesting

    • @dan4age
      @dan4age 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Garage4age should try some kelford turbo cams in the hilux

  • @crxtodd16
    @crxtodd16 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this. Thank you.

  • @tildenpillay2693
    @tildenpillay2693 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good videos very informative and fun.💯

  • @Ratridez
    @Ratridez 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If back pressure was a benefit wouldn't race cars have mufflers 🤔

  • @TheGarnerjustin73
    @TheGarnerjustin73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tbh, i never understood exhaust back pressure until finally i had a tuner explain it in the correct term, which is exhaust pulses. Since the pressure inside an exhaust isn't constant, it's spiking at the exhaust stroke in pulses. And that's why it's important to have a properly designed header that scavenges those pulses which in turn promote better breathing which equals power.

  • @sLothiC
    @sLothiC 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    X Pipe testing would be very interessting too

  • @rotrxentertainment5817
    @rotrxentertainment5817 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would love to see more 20v videos in the future!

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I have a little update vid with some revisions on the stuff i done in the last 20v vids. Nothing to major, but its making decent power for whats been changed. probably be out in a week or so.

  • @bigblockjalopy
    @bigblockjalopy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not really surprising but love these tests

  • @BryceW202
    @BryceW202 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Love this content mate! I know the data is right in front of us but it would be great if you could voice over at the end to clarify the results as some people may not understand all the data. We like to hear what you have to say ✌️

    • @Scuffed_Andy
      @Scuffed_Andy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep. I have no idea what the results were. Just tell me.

  • @802Garage
    @802Garage 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I fucking love this. Incredible.

  • @fellowship_of_the_goat
    @fellowship_of_the_goat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No filler bullshit, just results. Lovely

  • @drivingmylifeaway7149
    @drivingmylifeaway7149 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    just subbed! my favorite thing to argue at car shows! oh and claimed horsepower without dyno sheets 😂🤣

  • @Codriver72
    @Codriver72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I must say that I LOVE this channel! In the description it says that the intake runners are 47mm but how long are they from the intake flange? Bets regards from Sweden :)

    • @CP110
      @CP110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He has a video on the effect of differnt intakes and runner length.

  • @jonathanryan2915
    @jonathanryan2915 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It never made sense to me why the old guys always insist that you gotta have back pressure. But then they build a supercharged big block drag racer with straight pipes out the sides. Hey, where's the back pressure? Why would you want your engine to work harder to move exhaust out, even if it is just a regular car?

  • @baceto89
    @baceto89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice channel, can you please do a video comparing 4-1 vs 4-2-1 design :)

  • @63turbo
    @63turbo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Noticing the large spike in power in one spot with the higher back pressure settings, it might make for an interesting test to plot the throttle position that coincides with these peaks and the rpm that it happens at, then actually rig some sort of linkage that mimics the setting that is working at a particular rpm... might work even better with 2 or more of these exhaust throttles positioned at various points on the main exhaust tube, and find the throttle settings that work for each of these peaks... synched properly I think it would be the functional equivalent of a variable length exhaust pipe... heck of a lot of work, but cool to see how it would work.

  • @lewdog9647
    @lewdog9647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Finally the myth has been busted! Thank you very much!

    • @vasek987
      @vasek987 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It has been busted for this specific setup. If you are running stock engine and you put in non restrictive exhaust it will be contraproductive without adjusting other parts...

    • @SecwetGwiwer
      @SecwetGwiwer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@vasek987 oh Jesus fuckin Christ! No it won’t!

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@vasek987 th-cam.com/video/24Z3TeMq69E/w-d-xo.html This vid i dropped the exhaust off after the header 2-1 section. It made a little more power everywhere. car basically stock other than aftermarket ecu, so i know its not the ecu doing weird stuff

    • @satanaz
      @satanaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Garage4age any chance you can run it without headers without damaging the car or setting anything on fire?
      curious to see how much the power drops by removing the header completely

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@satanaz The time i ran it up with open header & megaphone. It was like the apocalypse had come. Silence and no wildlife as far as you could see. So not so keen for no header haha. the cam overlap makes them really loud. maybe i will find something else to try it on though.

  • @sandpiper1515
    @sandpiper1515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    You should make a UEL header for it, I bet it would sound amazing.

  • @mattmorrison6958
    @mattmorrison6958 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such a simple test but love that it was all logged and put into one concise video.
    You mentioned the AFR got richer with higher back pressure, which was expected, and curious if the VE/fueling changes scaled with the power losses or if the power losses were more significant than the VE drop alone would suggest. Essentially curious if pumping losses showed up- which seem to have more emphasis than they deserve in most cases, or if it was mainly the VE losses from reduced scavenging and more reversion.
    Cheers

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I didn't really work it out too precisely or get too picky on the high pressure runs for obvious reasons. but can say most of it come from ve or lack of. As i recall taking 15% fuel out of the map, plus some trimming here and there to get the afr ballpark.

  • @Sparky_D
    @Sparky_D 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you have an exhaust pressure reading using just a stock muffler? It's be interested to know how much back pressure one creates

  • @Stylerbc
    @Stylerbc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @t_money_third9654
    @t_money_third9654 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You should dyno exhaust velocity with pipe size instead of a freaking butterfly valve. That way when you have a negative pressure wave behind each pulse it'll help in valve overlap instead of the vaccume being destroyed by the other half of the butterfly valve.

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its just showing what the wrong exhaust does on good header / collector combo. If i changed the pipe size after the collector it would do very similar thing. have done it before. All the power is in the header and collector. rest of exhaust just needs to flow enough to let them do there job or not be there at all.

    • @t_money_third9654
      @t_money_third9654 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Garage4age if what you think is true then exhaust leaks after the collector would have 0% impact of performance which isn't true at all

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@t_money_third9654 Can't say ive tested exhaust leaks. Maybe i will sometime, my money will be on it doesn't do anything. unless exhaust too small, then probably of benefit. What im calling the collector is more than just the merge btw, the size,shape and length needs to be right after the merge.

    • @roman3s
      @roman3s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@t_money_third9654 An exhaust leak will most definitely affect your performance - if it's meaning oxygen that isnt a combustion byproduct reaches the oxygen sensor.

  • @roderickconstantino5354
    @roderickconstantino5354 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My eyes were on the torque

  • @GrantOakes
    @GrantOakes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The myth that an engine NEEDS back pressure to perform best is bunk! Engine masters did a test with various headers and complete exhaust systems and in a nutshell, the larger the headers and pipes, the more torque the engine would make, especially as the RPM came up. Think of it this way, you're running a foot race, would you want to be breathing through a mask or free air?

  • @Kremergarage
    @Kremergarage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice

  • @cbdrift
    @cbdrift 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Just curious - how many times a week is the engine in the starlet in pieces or even swapped out totally? :)
    Love the content - this has to be the most informative dyno channel around :) Thank you :)

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      too many, lucky its pretty easy to work on

    • @tortron
      @tortron 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Garage4age about normal for a starlet

    • @weixianng
      @weixianng 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tortron how come?

    • @tortron
      @tortron 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@weixianng when I was a teenager starlets were worth about $100 so we just thrashed k engines till they stopped, then swapped a box of beer for a new one. My mate swapped a $40 air pistol for a kp60

    • @weixianng
      @weixianng 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tortron wow. Thanks for the context. I was born in the 90's so I only got to know the Starlet when it's now being romantically looked at as a sought after classic RWD car.

  • @stahab
    @stahab 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People that still support the idea of backpressure, need to realize that the exhaust gases are pulsed and not a stable stream of gasses.
    Picking the right diameter and length of the exhaust tubes means tuning the exhaust pipe to work best at certain RPM by maximizing scavenging, which in reality, minimizes exhaust pressure.

  • @parvariramin
    @parvariramin ปีที่แล้ว

    ‏Thanks for the great video, I put a gasket on the connection between the muffler and the exhaust pipe for a better sound. It can be said that this part of the exhaust is leaking now, will it damage the car engine in the long run or not?

  • @timothyshearer6538
    @timothyshearer6538 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    First off, love the content!
    I’m curious if you’ve ever compared header termination types specifically 4-2-1 and 4-1 to see if there’s any benefit to having all the exhaust paths terminate together? I’m under the impression that there would be some sort of exhaust pulse overlap that would contribute to better power and torque.
    What are your thoughts?

    • @DatBoiOrly
      @DatBoiOrly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      depends on the application or what power bias you want if we're talking N/A like straight pipes out of the heads it's more favorable to RPM but lower in torque whist on the other end of the scale a log manifold is great for torque but lower in RPM. The better the flow the higher it can rev the less it can flow the greater the torque. pulses are either cancel each other out if they colide or create a vacuum if they flow the same direction vacuum is better for RPM but doesn't beat straight piped exhaust systems for RPMS and colideing pulses are great for torque.

    • @littleherms3285
      @littleherms3285 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      4-2-1 headers are also referred to as tri-Y headers. They will always make more torque than a 4-1 header because they pair up 2 cyl that are the furthest apart in the firing order to maximize scavenging. How long the Y legs are determines where the scavenging is most effective and you can move your torque peak around a fair bit.
      Only works well when you can make your own and test. Most are just tuned for where ever the engine they are ment for makes peak torque.
      Want a small engine to make much more torque way down low? Make the legs as long as a 4-1 header then Y up the cyl that make sense. 1342 firing order would pair up 1,4 and 3,2.
      Bet you get a 5-10% spike in torque below torque peak with no loses up top if sized appropriately.

    • @barneymiller7894
      @barneymiller7894 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Found out Tri Y style turbo headers apparently spool a large turbo noticeably better. The owner of the "KC Maxx" Firebird built a set and is very happy with them 💁

  • @alexhise968
    @alexhise968 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Air in and air out with as much thermal expansion possible during the power stroke will equal the highest power

  • @TomoReso
    @TomoReso 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Garage 4age FTW. Now try out vacuum :D
    Use some other engine to power a turbine which sucks in the exhaust of that red car and makes vacuum in it haha xD
    Now seriously, great video as always. Simple, short, sometimes funny, and informative. GJ!

  • @nemanja162
    @nemanja162 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You just got a sub from me mate.

  • @charliefoxtrott1048
    @charliefoxtrott1048 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what if, if you can create some sort of a vacoum insinde the exaust? will it increase power? Like with venturi effect or air pressed towards the rear end?

  • @CL9k24a3
    @CL9k24a3 ปีที่แล้ว

    how did you measure it? At idle , at certain rpm or under load(WOT)?

  • @stevenbusk539
    @stevenbusk539 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would like to see the result of one of those vortex type silencers, and also do two catalytic converters in series clean up a performance engine enough to meet recent emissions limits? E.g can you clean up a Cammy performance engine with exhaust after treatment and mapping to make them clean enough to meet emissions limits.

  • @TrillMurray
    @TrillMurray 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This I gotta see! I've always considered back pressure to be as necessary as waiting 30 minutes to swim after eating to prevent cramps. I guess today we find out!

    • @johncameron6864
      @johncameron6864 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't swim can you?

    • @TrillMurray
      @TrillMurray 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johncameron6864 I can swim fine. That's why I think back pressure as a necessity is a myth and anyone who believes back pressure is important has back pressure in their brain. No offence btw

    • @a-a-rondavis9438
      @a-a-rondavis9438 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      both are myths. You can swim after eating, but there's no need to do so because your body is trying to prioritize blood flow to the digestive muscles. Take a casual walk for 10 minutes after each meal and you'll gain digestive health, nutrient partitioning, and insulin sensitivity. Any real activity after eating or sleeping after eating is a big no.

  • @BEYTEK
    @BEYTEK 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    man i love tihhis shit

  • @nigelsmith7366
    @nigelsmith7366 ปีที่แล้ว

    MotoIQ has a great video on this topic

  • @Julezaz
    @Julezaz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, you are best

  • @cooki6112
    @cooki6112 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder how 1 cylinder engines would respond, as there is no exhaust scavenging as such so what would be the most efficient exhaust setup?

  • @FullPowerPillock
    @FullPowerPillock 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is actually an extremely interesting test.
    Given the data it’s looks very much like the idea of backpressure is only related to minor amounts or torque below 3,500rpm.
    It’s probably likely that the idea probably started somewhere where they were developing cars for non performance street uses

    • @user-lz3sv5sw9u
      @user-lz3sv5sw9u 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The idea probably stemmed from 2 stroke gas engines which do benefit from a certain amount of back pressure to prevent fresh air/fuel mixture from being sucked out the exhaust port. 4 stroke engines on the other hand benefit from the exhaust exiting the cylinder at a high velocity, creating a strong vacuum in the cylinder at whatever rpm the exhaust header was designed for.

  • @matsandersen6119
    @matsandersen6119 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank You :-)

  • @Funtik.
    @Funtik. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks 👍🏻😊

  • @I3igTasty
    @I3igTasty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very cool stuff man! I am really interested in the positioning of X pipe in the midpipe and the different effects.. I got bmw 2.5 inline 6 with 3 2 2 exhaust, but i dont think i would be translateble from your engine..

    • @nielsreiziger4850
      @nielsreiziger4850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I got a M52 2.8 and recently made my own stainless exhaust. I still have the factory 3-2 headers with a cat which merge in to a 2-1 collector after the cats to a 3" pipe up till just after the diff. I noticed the car is much more responsive on throttle and pull slightly harder between 3 and 4.5k and starts to fall off after 5.5k rpm (3.5k VANOS opens)

  • @albapor1
    @albapor1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do some part throttle tests as well ?

  • @k5guy
    @k5guy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    People don't understand it's the resonance frequency that offers more scavenging at lower rpm.
    Back pressure myth is painfully believed by way too many.

    • @k5guy
      @k5guy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would be interesting to see a full wave tuned exhaust effect on hp though.
      I recall that being around 45' or so for resonance on an engine at peak rpm

  • @FlyApeRally
    @FlyApeRally 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So... exhaust diameter then affect hp?
    Flow / resonance?

  • @makantahi3731
    @makantahi3731 ปีที่แล้ว

    that is why even stock restrictive exhaust does not reduce power for more than 10-15%, or gain with good exhaust is about 10-15% and bigger difference is on lower rpm than on higher rpm

  • @BuddyCorp
    @BuddyCorp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good shit. It's not about backpressure, it's about flow. Flow and pressure are intertwined but separate, but people can find it counterintuitive how one affects the other.

  • @JonnyDuzzit
    @JonnyDuzzit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've said this many times before and i'll say it again, 4stroke motors dont NEED backpressure to make power the way a 2 stroke needs it.

    • @sachadohc2912
      @sachadohc2912 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You certainly not chek the video hehe les backpressure make the most power 🤣

    • @sachadohc2912
      @sachadohc2912 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry i mis read sir haha

  • @Chopped93VX
    @Chopped93VX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this. Now I have something to show to the old heads who think backpressure is everything. Lol

  • @png.broccoli4093
    @png.broccoli4093 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey just wondering does anyone know how to tell if a kp60 starlet is a trd is there a badge on the chassis somewhere

  • @sasukekonoxa
    @sasukekonoxa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey, have weird request to test, everyone knows about 4-2-1 n 4-1, but what about 4-4 exhaust and 4-2 exhaust on inline 4 engine, i guess that could be quite interesting

  • @crd-nz_001
    @crd-nz_001 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lots of debate still with pipe size and length...
    Would a few sets of Zoomies be easy enough to make and test?
    And wake the dead...

  • @forbiddenera
    @forbiddenera 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Its not about back pressure as much as it is resonance tuning (for N/A).. and no, you don't want really any back pressure on turbo.

  • @atwaass
    @atwaass 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cam timing is important to match higher air flow also a silenced system delivers more low down torque.

    • @hotrodray6802
      @hotrodray6802 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      thats because a silenced system creates more backpressure as expanding gasses volume increases with rpm.

  • @Christdeliverme
    @Christdeliverme 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Obviously the next test is going to be adjusting for cam overlap in the presence of back pressure at various amounts.

  • @drift400
    @drift400 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wonder the effect on a NA car.
    2-strokes the exhaust pipe is the turbo. The expansion chamber design lets unburned gas fuel mixtures back into the engine for a turbocharging effect. I wonder if you can apply this to 4-strokes. With a little expansion chamber on each header.

    • @Finnspin_unicycles
      @Finnspin_unicycles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is an NA car, so you don't have to wonder..

  • @twistedtuningandperformanc7799
    @twistedtuningandperformanc7799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Most people confuse back pressure with exhaust velocity.Exhaust velocity can change the power band of a motor.

    • @Dare0rDieTV
      @Dare0rDieTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U all over the internet homie?!
      Good stuff here.

  • @danastallings5694
    @danastallings5694 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yea I remember on my turbo dart when I made my own down pipe 3 inch straight dump to the ground now cat or muffler he was lecturing me on back pressure while I'm trying to explain my turbo needs to breath out as good as she breaths in back pressure used to be a way to start a argument lol.

  • @Hondabond35
    @Hondabond35 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So it's about Heather flow and collector and some back pressure

  • @allthehandlesweretaken
    @allthehandlesweretaken 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i know that sometimes not going crazy with the diameter of the exhaust system, can increase the velocity of the exhaust which in turn can decrease the resistance the engine sees. But im very curious as to where this urban legend of exhaust back pressure comes from? surely having back pressure just for the sake of back pressure , will do nothing except increase resistance for the engine

    • @TheSilviu8x
      @TheSilviu8x 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's much more complicated than this. This experiment proves very little, if not that the throttle plate bounced back the pressure wave, changing the dyno graph curve, insignificantly. Back pressure is a derivative of a chosen design that diminish the exhaust gas to return into the cylinder.
      Of course is to be kept at minimum, to limit the pumping loses..
      More power means more air mass, more everything, bigger ports, no way a small section will produce big power. The sections are determined by the diameter of the valves.

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It just shows what a restrictive exhaust will do on a otherwise good header/collector. which is where all the power is. changing pipe sizes after said items will do very similar

  • @99subigt
    @99subigt ปีที่แล้ว

    I was always told that in N/A cars you need to get rid of the back pressure for more HP, but you will sacrifice TQ by getting rid of the back pressure, now this is what I was told in the 90s, today's car's are different do to technology and with a simple tune you can balance things out, I'm old school and I like at least the most minimum back pressure possible from my experience running lots of exhaust setups on cars that I have owned, not to mention that if you have straight through piping you will make some ears bleed with the 100% cabin drone that will make you regret your decision for more HP, not to mention the check engine light and the emissions on the state that you might live in.

  • @WholesaleTurbos
    @WholesaleTurbos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got a 2.5" tip reducer for my 4" exhaust it won't even rev past 3k but it's quiet

  • @Fk8td
    @Fk8td 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Back pressure is a myth thats not what happens. The length of the exhaust itself can tune the out going exhaust pulses which helps get the exhaust out faster creating differences in power band. This video proves that 100 percent.

  • @akaitv6606
    @akaitv6606 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is that 130hp or 130 kw , what size exhaust is it running. My vehicle makes 158kw at the wheels using 2 1/2" single system . However I think it could benefit from 2 3/4 "

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      130kw. yeah kinda depends on the engine setup to a point. an engine with big cams and overlap will benefit more than something with stock/smaller cams

  • @panospapadimitriou3498
    @panospapadimitriou3498 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love power in the middle .. try that with straight pipe bigger than it should !!!!! cant ? i know~~~~~ the how long you gonna push it , spooling or lag is another chapter!!!! this is why turbo group cars have tight setups!!! sorry to kill the dreams of many turbo guys in this chat i saw some comments about turbo already ...this is why i mentioned something about charged ones

  • @oscarzt1652
    @oscarzt1652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    damn 18 psi of exhaust pressure is more than the 14psi atmospheric pressure trying to get into the engine

    • @TheSilviu8x
      @TheSilviu8x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, but it's irrelevant. The main goal, on N.A. engines, is to keep the flow running, just like when you're emptying a tank of liquid, with a hose. The secret is to keep the flow, even if closed and opened repeatedly, do to inerzia and correct speeds, determined by the section, shapes and... luck...

  • @ShredCulture
    @ShredCulture 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    During the 18 psi run, could the torque spikes be an indication of detonation?

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most likely misfire,

  • @oikkuoek
    @oikkuoek 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you block off the exhaust, the power output goes down.. Now who would've guessed it. But, there was one interesting spike on the curve, that is a clue to the "back pressure" conundrum. The thing has nothing to do with psi, but pulses. Is the exhaust draining the combustion chamber, or filling it, when the valves are @ the overlapping phase, which one it should do, where the torque is needed and how it's used. The exhaust is a tuning element, just like the intake, and these two need to work in unison to really make power.

    • @Garage4age
      @Garage4age  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, read my pinned comment

  • @tiitsaul9036
    @tiitsaul9036 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did some back pressure measurements and I discovered mine developed slight vacuum during deceleration. Is it normal? I recorded it on video and it's on my channel. Please check it out if you have a spare moment.