docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScqjJqT0Zaiiq2r9dprQD6U0K59RLOLQfqq0gh-TBKax1vQAw/viewform?usp=sharing Join Current Affairs Plus Course by Sumit Rewri Sir www.pw.live/study/batches/current-affairs-plus-by-sumit-sir-708041/batch-overview?activeSection=Description
The following ethical features may be included in this case - the first his poverty and his love for his wife and violation of law but reemal should to help his family and government provide many initiative to very poor people like that Ayushman card and by the card free treatment up to 5 lakh and other option is help to NGo
Sir, this is called as Heinz's Dilemma. Ramlal though did a seemingly immoral thing by stealing but the purpose was to save a life. Islamic principles say that saving a life is same as saving the entire humankind. Ramlal should go back to the pharmacist later and explain his situation and how he took that decision out of love and compulsion. As we are not aware of pharmacist's life situation, if possible, Ramlal should try to make up for the loss of pharmacist in short or long term. Ramlal can seek help from civil society, government, CSR initiatives to make up for the loss of Pharmacist.
Dilemma : stealing is morally and legally wrong though sometimes when our loved one is in a difficult situation we didn't hesitate to do anythings, but still there are some other ways to approach the situation 1. Ramalal should explain his situation to the shopkeeper there I a possibility that shopkeeper might understand his problem and help him. 2. Taking help from some other people 3. Talking to doctor about his condition so that he can aware him about the ayushman bharat scheme and providing him help from it Lastly it is the responsibility of our government to provide proper ,accessible and affordable Healthcare facilities for poor . 2. Spreading awareness related to health schemes for the poor so that the actual beneficiary can get the benefit of the scheme.
What Ramnath had done is legally wrong bcoz he broke the accepted social and legal norms of the country . But whatever he did is due to his value of • Love 💕 & care for his wife. •Poverty is not solely his fault , it is also government failure that unaffordablity of Healthcare in pvt hospitals & lack of quality service in government hospitals . Thus, In my opinion his act is subject to Legal Scrutiny but not Ethical Scrutiny .😊😊
रामनाथ को इंजेक्शन चुरा लेने के बाद स्वयं से ही दुकानदार को यह सब बता देना चाहिए और उसे अनुरोध करना चाहिए की वह वह पैसा धीरे धीरे किस्तों में चूका देगा, और दुकानदार से वह क्षमतामांगे, और उपयुक्त समय की मांग करें जिसमें वह उनके पैसों को धीरे धीरे चुका सके। यदि दुकानदार नहीं मानता है तो रामनाथ को स्वयं ही पुलिस के पास जाकर सरेंडर करना चाहिए और पुलिस को सारी बातें बतानी चाहिए। हमारे लॉ एंड ऑर्डर किया जिम्मेदारी होगी कि वह परिस्थितियों को समझ कर न्याय करें और रामनाथ को कठोर सजना दे। मैं सजा के रूप में समाज सेवा याआदि दे जब उनकी पत्नी स्वस्थ हो जाए। और सरकार को पब्लिक वेलफेयर फंड से उसे दुकानदार को पैसे दे देना चाहिए। ( उपयुक्त तरीके से कानून व्यवस्था और मानवता दोनों सुरक्षित होंगे। इससे न ही अन्य लोगों को चोरी के लिए बढ़ावा मिलेगा और रामनाथ को कठोर सजा।)
Here is a summary of the video in bullet points: Key Issues Discussed: * Men's Rights: * The case of Atul Subhash, an AI engineer who committed suicide due to alleged harassment and false accusations by his wife and in-laws. * The lack of gender-neutral laws in India, particularly regarding men's rights. * The misuse of laws like Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. * Manipur Violence: * The ongoing conflict between the Meitei and Kuki communities in Manipur. * The Supreme Court's order to the Manipur government to provide details of property damage and encroachment. * The need for a truth and reconciliation mechanism to address the violence and restore peace. * Secularism: * The Allahabad High Court judge's alleged hate speech against minority communities. * The importance of judicial independence and impartiality in upholding secular values. Other Points: * A hypothetical dilemma about a man stealing a life-saving medicine due to financial constraints. * A discussion on ethical considerations and the importance of critical thinking. * An assignment for viewers to write a 250-word answer to a given question.
Sir mppsc के छात्रों के साथ बहुत अन्याय हो रहा है आप uppsc bpsc के लिए इतना सपोर्ट करते हैं थोड़ी आवाज mppsc के लिए भी उठा दीजिए यहां पर आरक्षण का मुद्दा 5 साल से चल रहा है और परिणाम की कोई उम्मीद नहीं दिखती है आंदोलन करने के लिए स्टूडेंट पॉलिटिक्स का सक्रिय होना जरूरी है जिसे प्रदेश सरकार ने स्टूडेंट्स पॉलिटिक्स खत्म करके पहले ही बंद कर दिया है । हमें न मार्गदर्शन मिलता है न कि सपोर्ट तारीख पर तारीख का डायलॉग एक दम फिट बैठता है 18 December को हम लोग आयोग पर शांतिपूर्ण आंदोलन करने वाले हैं। आपसे सपोर्ट की आशा रखते हैं 🙏🏻
Dilemmas: Individual interest vs Social Interest Utilitarianism vs Integrity towards society Self interest vs human value Suggestions: To talk of other alternative mechanism to ensure his wife well being to the person
Ramlal pahle shopkeeper se apni situation ko explain kare ge or help mang sakte h agr shopkeeper help krne ke liye ready ho jaye tab tu thik h warna or kese person yeh govt initiative se help ki demand kr sakte h yeh best tarika rahega chori se... Thank you dear sir ♥️♥️♥️
ये बात बिल्कुल सही है कि पहले महिला के साथ अत्याचार होता था जिसको देखते हुए हमारी कानून महिला को विभिन्न डायवर्सिटी के तहत सुरक्षा प्रदान करती है ।लेकिन हाल के कई मामले में यह कानून का missuse हो रहा है। थोरी सी कानून में प्रोविजन की जरूरत है जैसे रैप,दहेज,etc के मामलों में
Chori se jyada important kisi person ki jaan hai Because wo injection hazzaro mil jayenge lekin kisi ki jaan ek hi hoti hai Agar emergency me hame koi es type ka kadam uthana pade to ye galat nhi hoga Baad me ham apni galti ke liye maafi mang sakte hai
Dilemma - responsibly for family vs moral values Life of individual vs values 1)He can take help from medical shopkeeper and try to convince him or her and can explain that he will pay shopkeeper's money in future 2) can take help from other people who present in medical shop
0:01 good afternoon sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤ 3:14 Sir, according to me, in this case, we have to discuss both perspectives of the people involved. According to the shopkeeper, the job done by Ramnath is wrong. However, from Ramnath’s perspective, he wanted to save his wife’s life. Sometimes, we do things that are illegal but for a good purpose. We have to think like humans and understand why a person does something illegal; there is usually a reason. For example, in this case, Ramnath wanted to save his wife’s life, invoking Article 21 (Right to Life).On the other hand, if we follow the concept of good governance, the Rs 1 lakh should be paid by the government as a responsible government through multiple schemes or any other method. I am neutral in this case because both the shopkeeper and Ramnath are right in their own ways. However, I believe that life is the most important thing. The shopkeeper should consider why Ramnath did something illegal. The shopkeeper should think beyond profit and act humanely because God made humans to help each other. If the shopkeeper has a shop, it means he has multiple injections. If one injection goes to a person who can’t pay for it, I don’t think he will face a very big loss. I accept that it is the shopkeeper’s money, but he should also think about saving a life.Another solution could be that the shopkeeper talks to Ramnath and gives him a job or time to repay the Rs 1 lakh if the government does not pay the money. Thank you so much, sir. Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 ❤❤. 13:19 IPC 302 is equals to section 101 of BNS and section 498a of IPC is equals to section 85 and 86 in BNS 17:00 The writer gives a very nice argument and solution. First of all, in this case, it is a harassment case involving Atul Subhash, who was an AI engineer in Bengaluru. The Dowry Act case is being heard in the Jaunpur family court, and he had to travel daily for the hearings, incurring regular expenses. Atul’s wife has done a very seamless job of accusing her husband, who was working for her family. In his suicide video, he mentioned that his wife and her family have no permission to touch his body. In the video, he apologized to his parents, saying he could not sustain himself anymore. He also mentioned the extra charges imposed by the judge for the case.Overall, I want to ask one question: What is the meaning of law? Law is for the welfare of people. In this case, where is the welfare? Articles 14 to 18 of the Indian Constitution guarantee the Right to Equality. Where is the equality? Every person is equal in the eyes of the law. The word “equality” has become a joke because of certain individuals and a few judges.if a person is not able to earn money, how can he give money to his wife? After divorce, if the wife has the right to remarry, she should do so. If she chooses not to remarry, how can the husband be expected to support her financially? In this case, Atul’s wife allegedly told him to commit suicide, making her responsible for his death. This makes her a criminal. The Karnataka police have arrested Atul’s brother-in-law, mother-in-law, and wife. Does anyone have an idea of how the case is progressing? Despite the evidence, including the suicide video and the evidence, including the suicide video and note provided by Atul’s brother, why is the court not taking a decision? This indicates a failure of the Right to Equality. At the end, I want to mention that I am requesting each and every female to please not do this in the future. Think about the person you married and how your actions affect them. I am not talking about all females, but a few do behave this way. We need to change the judicial system to ensure that the Right to Equality is truly equal. Thank you so much sir. Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤ 29:02 thank you so much sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤
Dukandar se bolkar help legen. Jitana paisa mere pass hoga vo dedegen aur jo baki rahega usko dhire dhire chukane keliye bolegen. Par chori nahi karegen.
In one side we are fighting for equal rights for men and women . Other side we are providing alimony . If women is already in job what are the requirement of alimony . Alimony should based on women family income . her income also .
1.झूठा केस करवाने,करने , झूठा फैसला देने वाले को कम से कम दस साल की जेल हो । 2 नेटवर्क वीडियो रिकॉर्डर से कोर्ट रूम के हरएक फैसला की रिकॉर्डिंग हो , पेशकार के ऊपर भी एक कैमरा लगा हो,सभी जांच सार्वजनिक हो, तभी थोड़ा डर लगेगा l 😢
Its about means and end.sir ye chori sahi hai kyunki is chori se ek Insan ki Jaan Bach rahi hai aur us ek lakh rupaye se shopkeeper ki Jaan Ko koi nuksan nahin hoga aur vah uncle ji bhi bad mein unko vah paise de sakte hain to baad m chori bhi nhi rahegi fir
Dilemma Love vs honesty Life vs social responsibility Short term benefit vs long term harm As per situation ramnath ne sahi Kiya But later ramrath ki responsibility hai ki wo khud se jakar bole ki chori maine ki hai then apologize kare Through social funding chemist bale bande ko full payment karen
सर उनका चुराना सही होगा क्योकि पत्नी के सही होने के बाद वे अपना खेत /जमीन का एक हिस्सा बेंचकर पैसे लौटा दें और बाद मे दुकानदार से माफ़ी मांग लें जिससे उनकी ईमानदारी भी बनी रहेगी और जान भी बच जाएगी और उनका प्यार भी बना रहेगा-i think that's right 👍👍
Sir ,unhone shi kya wife ke thik hone ke bad apne khet bechkr Paisa Chuka dengai or ooo agar yaisa nhi karte to may be unki wife ka Jaan bhi ja sakti thi or koi rules kisi ke Jaan se bdhkar nhi ho sakta so Ramnath ne shi kya
किसी व्यक्ति की जान बचाना हमारी जिम्मेदारी होनी चाहिए, ऐसे में की गई चोरी आपने आप में गलत उद्देश के साथ नहीं की गई परंतु चोरी चोरी ही है बूढ़े व्यक्ति को उपयुक्त मामले के बारे में स्वयं पुलिस को अवगत कराना चाहिए और अपने आगे के निर्णय को सरकार पर सौपना चाहिए, सरकार भी सुनिश्चित करें कि उस व्यक्ति को सांकेतिक रूप में सजा दी जाएं,(14 दिन या 20 दिन बुज़ुर्ग की सेहत को ध्यान में रख कर) व प्राइवेट मेडिकल फॉर्म को उनके हुई नुकसान की भरपाई वेलफेयर फंड से की जाए ताकि प्राइवेट इंटीटीज़ का विश्वाश सरकार पर बना रहें|
@thermogram8762 बिल्कुल आपकी बात का में मान रखता हूं परंतु सरकार को यह भी सुनिश्चित करना होगा कि ऐसा कृत्य बाकियों के लिए उदाहरण न बन जाएं, उपयुक्त पहलुओं को ध्यान में रख कर दी गई सज़ा कम है जिसका कारण चोरी के उद्देश का उचित होना है, अगर फिर भी ये सजा ज्यादा है तो इसे तब लागू किया जाए जब पेशेंट अपना ध्यान खुद रखने योग्य हो जाए, - (1 लाख रुपए की दवा, मेडिकल पर काम काने वाले कर्मचारी का मानसिक तनाव,सामाजिक व्यवस्था में एक अनैतिक उदाहरण प्रस्तुत करना)
सर कॉमन्स से बात है अगर वो इंजेक्शन चुरा भी लेते हैं तो पकड़े जाएंगे।एंड this is also wrong activity So firstly he requested from doctor to suggest govt initiative for old age, Poors and incapable person (article 39)to buy High cost medicine. And secondly he need to requested from shopkeeper to provide medicine new it's urgent and give surety with integral trust that he will pay him money as soon as possible.
Stakeholders:- Ramnath, patient, pharmacist, doctor. Issues and dilemmas -law vs life Love vs integrity Emotional affection vs ethical responsibility Personal interest vs public interest Values- love, compassion, priority to human life. Justification:- Upyogitavad - life is greater than money. Situation:- last option,emergency. Bad me ramnath ko pharmacist ko assurance dena chahiye ki vah saare paise return kar dega. Pharmacist maan jata hai to thik hai. Vrna ramnath ko khud surrender kar dena chahiye aur police ko saari situation batana chahiye jisse charge sheet me allegation lage. Esse patient ki jaan bhi Bach jayegi rule of law bhi serve ho jayega. Doctor ki bhi kuch responsibility hai Ramnath aur uski wife dono bahut gariv hai to unhe aayushmaan bhart yojana jisme senior citizens ke liye special provisions hai Uska labh dilana chahiye. Ya us mahnge injection ka alternate use karna chahiye. Ya kisi Anya yojana(govt. Help) ka labh dilana chahiye.
Perfect 🌟 I’ve read all the comments but government schemes wala point Kisine nhi Uthaya , it would have been a perfect ans if Ramnath kisi officer ke pass Gaya Hota , in this situation there are only two people involved, Ramnath and medical wale bhaiya
Yes i will convene to shopkeeper but he is not understand my situation then will move to other shops but no one can understand then i will decide one person can fight with death so their life is important that perticular moment so i think when i should theft because life is more important that time then she /he is get better then any situation we can handle because life is very precious and all is fair in love .....😂
pahle dukandar se aapni condition ke bare mai batana chaiye jitna ho sake utna paise unko de denge taki chori ka nobat na aaye dukandar ko netitikta ke khatir unki help karni chaiye
If wo old man Injection ki mangni karta to shayad dukandar deta ya nahi bhi deta ..kuchh keh nahi sakte aur waha Unki wife ko bachane k liye emergency me injection jaroori tha to ethics k anusar bhale hi usne chori ki lekin usne apni wife ko bachaya .... Hala ki usne chori ki lekin jab bhi 1-2 months me uske pas paise ka jugad ho jaye ya kama le tab use lauta dene chahiye aur us dukandar se mafi bhi mang Leni chahiye...☺️☺️
Sir it's a debate about means vs ends . The end is right ( Caring for your loved ones ) But the means is not right ( stealing) While it can be justified by teleology but it is unjustified by deontology as stealing can never be justified. Moreover stealing will cause a slippery slope . I would follow the Gandhian philosophy:- If the means is right , the end itself will be right. So the stealing by ramnath will be wrong , even if his intention is right.
This is called Heinz Dilemma. This theory is given Educational psychologist Kohlberg. Kohlberg gives the theory of moral development in human into different stages.
Ramlal ko chori nhi krni chahiye thi bcz Injection ka price ₹ 1,00,000 tha to medical wale ko pta lg jaiyega and phir Ramlal k liye ye or Muskil ho Jaiyega But Ramlal try krta to medical wala usse udhar de skta tha jisse wo police case se bch jata or ushki wife ka bhi Treatment ho jata Chori Glt h but chori kr li h to ramlal ko glti maan leni chahiye and as soon as possible return kr dena chahiye
Misuse to har law ka hota hi hai chahe vo kisi bhi gender ki protection ke liye ho . But when an educated & awared women like her misuse these laws it deprived thousands of vulnerable, uneducated women from their rights , Bachpan me ek Story suni thi bhediya aaya bhediya aaya but bhediya kabhi nahi ata tha but ek din sach me a gya but gav Walo ne bat nhi mani this is how misuse of laws decrease the trust
Vese chori nhi krni chahiye lekin agr dukan vale se jo pese h un peso ko dekar dva leni chahiye thi jo pese bchate use dheerw dheere de de ni chahiye 😊 thanks for editorial discussion sir 🙏🏻 😊😊
Ramlal ko chori nhi krni chahiye thi,unhe dukandaar se baat krni chahiye thi apni pareshani btani chahiye thi, legally wrong ❌ kiya h ramlal ne, but he done all for saving life of his wife ❤
sir i think unhone jo kiya wo sahi kiya....because we can not measure someone's life with money ,1lakh ki injections se kisi ki jaan bachai jaa sakti h to ismein kuch galat nhi h...**wese bhi hum medicines banate hi isliye h ki logo ki jaan bachai ja sake**...aur chori ki baat kare to wo baad mein chae to khud surrender kar sakte h apni chori k baare mein jab unki wife ki treatment acche se ho jaye .
Stealing is wrong if it happened any way to save anyone or for love ones.ramalal save his wife's life but wrong way,he not aware about government schemes about medical support.ramlal take help from other people, ramlal take help from Government shopkeeper that provide equal quality with less price medicines. Government responsibility to provide awareness about medical schemes so that people use schemes in emergency situation to save their love ones life.
Ramlal should negotiate with the shopkeeper.He must have something that can be kept as collateral to take shopkeeper in to confidence. He can return his money in installments later. On the other hand if shopkeeper denied to help in anyway ,by taking collatral also. Then his stealing the injection can be justified. He is stealing to save someone's life ,so it is for good cause .
Sir agar or koi rasta nhi tha to right h but ramnat ko fir medical vale ko Jake bta dena chahiye ki chori ki h(isse phle medical vale se ychna krni chahiye thi ki m rupy lota dunga bina puchhe sidha chori Kiya vo glt tha) 1. Ydi ramlal ptni ke alava kisi or ki Jan ke liye bhi yhi krta to yh priskrit sukhvad se shi hoga 2. Uska sadhy pvitr h but vo medical vale ko suchh bta kr dire dire rupy chukane ya galti ki sja apne ke liye tyar hota h to sadhan pvitr mana jayega 3. Iske example se visvshniyta bdhegi or ye morality ka ullnghn bhi nhi hoga Prntu sbse phle ramlal ke ak bar medical vale se puchna chahiye tha ki mere pass jo rupay h ve le lijiye baki m bad me lota dunga ydi medical vale ne mna kiya hota to dusra rasta apnana chahiye tha So bina phle kuchh puchhe chori krna wrong tha
Presently he must take the injection but by taking consideration to his moral values as well and can negotiate with the shopkeeper and the amount can be taken later from the old man in installments By doing so his love , affection towards his wife and the ethical values as an individual can be taken care
Kisi Ki Jaan bachane Ke Liye had Tak Jana chahie Baat Apne per Aaye To Chori na Karni chahie Hamare Najar Mein Jaan badi hai jaan bachne ke bad Bata Dena chahie ki maine Chori ki bus my opinion
I do absolutely agree with the writer of the first article. Recently I came across with such case where the girl who's a long time girlfriend with my friend but the situation in their family doesn't allow them to be husband and wife neither they had any promise to marry each other in the coming future. Now that girl is threatening him to marry her or she'll file a case about rape under false pretense of marriage. She's about to lodge the case. How will rhe law protect him in this case?
Stealing is unethical but in the case of ramlal will change the perspective life is first priority. jain philosophy supported this in ankenkantbad and syadbad.
Sir Bpsc exam dene gya tha question paper hi nhi mila pure do ghente class m bathe rhen tb bhi nhi mila 5th floor 4th hall, bapu pariksha parishar maurya bihar patna😢
Sir I respectfully you and our community Sir even Jagdish jangid sir ki class na continue ho sakti ho to kisi other sir se kara diya kare jaise apki class miss nhi hoti hai Most better for us Sir my riquest Yours obbidiently. Prince singh
First of all humanity should be given priority. He must have save her wife' life. So in this case we have no accusations regarding ethics & morality. After saving her life, if he comes back at the shop then he should elaborate whole process.
Ramnath ji ko injection chura ke le jana self ki moral values ke against ja rhe but life Bach rhi wo jyada important hai, ramnath ji me honesty toh hai integrity ke khilaaf hai. I agree karta hu ramnath ji ne galat Kiya parantu ramnath ji ne bachho ke future ke bare socha aur khud ko musibat me daal diya at that time ramnath ji super hero aapne wife ki nazro aur bachho ki me bhi shopkeeper ko loss ho gya agar shopkeeper empathy feel kar rha ho toh shopkeeper bhi ramnath ji ki saharana jarur Karega Jo dusra person baad m aaya tha maanlo wo usska bhai hua toh help ho jayegi thank you sir ji ❤
Ramnath ji ka injection chori se le jana sahi ya galt ? Step-1-----Wife ki life save karna jaruri hai , paise vo bad me bhi pay kar sakte hai Step-2----Genuine reason pr chori karna chori nhi hota for example beggar dwara roti churakar pet bharna chori nhi balki society pr chot hai itni inequality hona . Step-3---- public health sector ki failure hai ki unko aisa karna pd rha hai
Haa ye sahi to hai ethical view se but law ke according wrong hai. Agar jaldi jarurat hai to le ja sakte hai per baad me dukandar se bol sakte hai ki me apke paise thode thode karke lota dunga. Goverment schemes ki help li ja sakti hai. Yaha some values life, love, sympathy, and business profit ke beech contredection hai.
Ramlal act is immoral but is priority to save her wife life show humanity. In this situation, Ramlal should get back to chemist and apologise for his immoral act and ready to get penalise.
There should be laws that if any women claim false case so they should not be allow to claim next false case. and we can study how other countries are handling these situations and can integrate them as per indian situations
ramlal k paas agr koi option nhi bchta h to fir...chori krna shi kyuki love family priority and utilitierian aproch Is se khi bdh kr kisi person ki life ko bachane ki.liye glt raste k use glt hone sbhwna nhi rkhta h
Mean vs end Honesty vs dishonesty Kantian and Gandhian philosophy if your karma is bad then significantly consequences will be negatives. Dilemma involved in this case. 1.Life vs dead 2.Upholding morality vs erosion of morality 3. Conflict of consciousness Conscious not permitted vs loss of life. Options available to person. 1. Convince the shopkeeper pay amount later by adreessing the grievances. 1. Borrowing money from others might be relative or villagers. 3. If injection available at govt hospital then seek from there. 4. Taking the help from NGo , civil workers or public servants. 5. Seeking help of money through social media like facebook, twitters ..etc
First of all toh sir,as ramanath will tell the chemist about the emergency and urgent need to save her wife,he can seek help from the seller,chori Krna to thik nhi h ase trust lose hoga and loss of economy would be seen agr similar cases increase hote h to,,ramnath convience kr skta h , injection le skta h ye ensure kr k ki vo future me payment krega .
this is again abt means vs end in first instance ramlal did was wrong but after saving his wife life he with wife can go to medical shop and explain whole situation and repay the money in installments. 2. as is poor man there are many schemes of govt to help them he could directly take the benefit of those schemes to save life of his wife.
Mera ye opinion h ki un citizen ne chori bcz' unke pass paise nhi the itne agr unke pass paise hote to chori nhi krte ye baat bhi shi h ki us injection se unki wife ki jaan bach jayegi. Lekin us chori se us dukan wale ka bhi nuksan hoyega but ek nuksan se kisi vyakati ki jaan bachti h to ye glt nhi ho skta h
If women earning money then only children education upto 18 yrs of age should maintain by husband and grant by court. All other grant of money should be familial discussion.
Can speak to owner that he can pay amount on monthly basis.By this no one get loss old man's wife survives,for medical shop owner also recieves payment for medicine.
Ramnath can utilise the government schemes such as jan arogya yojana their upto 5 lakh govt provide , for concession medicine he can use janaushadi kendra . Shopkeeper also invested in that medicine so it is wrong although his intentions are right . He may habitually follow this for his benefits .
Good morning Sir, Stealing is morally Wrong but Socially right as society is driven by love and compassion. As our constitution provide the protection of life(Article21) and Public assistance in certain case(Article41) it is also duty of state to make arrangement as well. For this, State has started a scheme PMJAY(where family get 5lakh financial assistance for medical expanse). He can be encouraged by doctor to get benefits of this scheme. Stealing is wrong till accused is not accepting their crime and not willing to pay back. With the help of above scheme he can pay back or he could take help of crowdfunding or community funding as we have seen in case of Atul Kumar where he denied admission in IIT due to Financial constraint but later SC intervened and got admission.
Stealing injection,in pros - kant' absolute duty In cons - Gandhi's साध्य और साधन की पवित्रता My opinion is that ramnath should collect money with online donations after that he informed shopkeeper and pay the amount
i prefer gandhian philosophy where means are equally important as to ends and for me it is wrong to do stealing, one can arrange it from pleading and getting funds through crowdfunding and other means but for me stealing is wrong.
Its a delimma Ramlal should tell his situation to the pharmacist . He should gave the money whatever he had to pharmacist and rest will be paid soon . He done theft for saving a life its not crime,his intentions were good but the mean was not good. So he should tell his situation ho shopkeeper and seek help from him.
Leaving everything apart lets extend this , wo 1 lakh ka injection legaya magar dukan chalane wala owner tho tha nahi just a job holder , who will pay that 1 lakh ? Obviously shop owner jo kaam pe tha us waqt uski salary se kaatenge na . Ameer apna noqsan kabhi nahi karte
Yadi ramnath ji shopkeeper se kisi government scheme ke bare me puche jo financial help provide kar sakte hai,ya phir unke gao me SHG ke mamber se kuch financial help mil jaye to unhe chori nahi karni padegi , aur same se dava be mil jaye ge aur unki wife ki jan bhi Bach gayegi.
I am following up since 9th standard how i definition sir my answer writing is so improved by you sir my board exam I am performing very well sir thx 🙏🙏
Ise ham chhori nahi kah sakte sir ham jante hai ese Bina puchhe le jana galat bat hai but agar kisi jhuth se chori se kisi ki jan bachti hai ye ise galat nahi bol sakte ramlal old man hai to kah sakte inki majboori hai agar koi adult hota to jarur vo jugar kar sakta tha jaise kisi se lekar treatment karvana fir usko treatment ke bad earn karke de sakta tha
![KRK - ชนิสรา Ft.WanMai , N/A [Official MV] Prod. By Sakarin](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-WMwwYobcU/mqdefault.jpg)
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScqjJqT0Zaiiq2r9dprQD6U0K59RLOLQfqq0gh-TBKax1vQAw/viewform?usp=sharing
Join Current Affairs Plus Course by Sumit Rewri Sir
www.pw.live/study/batches/current-affairs-plus-by-sumit-sir-708041/batch-overview?activeSection=Description
The following ethical features may be included in this case - the first his poverty and his love for his wife and violation of law but reemal should to help his family and government provide many initiative to very poor people like that Ayushman card and by the card free treatment up to 5 lakh and other option is help to NGo
Sir, this is called as Heinz's Dilemma.
Ramlal though did a seemingly immoral thing by stealing but the purpose was to save a life. Islamic principles say that saving a life is same as saving the entire humankind. Ramlal should go back to the pharmacist later and explain his situation and how he took that decision out of love and compulsion. As we are not aware of pharmacist's life situation, if possible, Ramlal should try to make up for the loss of pharmacist in short or long term.
Ramlal can seek help from civil society, government, CSR initiatives to make up for the loss of Pharmacist.
Dilemma : stealing is morally and legally wrong though sometimes when our loved one is in a difficult situation we didn't hesitate to do anythings, but still there are some other ways to approach the situation
1. Ramalal should explain his situation to the shopkeeper there I a possibility that shopkeeper might understand his problem and help him.
2. Taking help from some other people
3. Talking to doctor about his condition so that he can aware him about the ayushman bharat scheme and providing him help from it
Lastly it is the responsibility of our government to provide proper ,accessible and affordable Healthcare facilities for poor .
2. Spreading awareness related to health schemes for the poor so that the actual beneficiary can get the benefit of the scheme.
What Ramnath had done is legally wrong bcoz he broke the accepted social and legal norms of the country . But whatever he did is due to his value of • Love 💕 & care for his wife. •Poverty is not solely his fault , it is also government failure that unaffordablity of Healthcare in pvt hospitals & lack of quality service in government hospitals .
Thus, In my opinion his act is subject to Legal Scrutiny but not Ethical Scrutiny .😊😊
रामनाथ को इंजेक्शन चुरा लेने के बाद स्वयं से ही दुकानदार को यह सब बता देना चाहिए और उसे अनुरोध करना चाहिए की वह वह पैसा धीरे धीरे किस्तों में चूका देगा, और दुकानदार से वह क्षमतामांगे, और उपयुक्त समय की मांग करें जिसमें वह उनके पैसों को धीरे धीरे चुका सके।
यदि दुकानदार नहीं मानता है तो रामनाथ को स्वयं ही पुलिस के पास जाकर सरेंडर करना चाहिए और पुलिस को सारी बातें बतानी चाहिए। हमारे लॉ एंड ऑर्डर किया जिम्मेदारी होगी कि वह परिस्थितियों को समझ कर न्याय करें और रामनाथ को कठोर सजना दे। मैं सजा के रूप में समाज सेवा याआदि दे जब उनकी पत्नी स्वस्थ हो जाए। और सरकार को पब्लिक वेलफेयर फंड से उसे दुकानदार को पैसे दे देना चाहिए।
( उपयुक्त तरीके से कानून व्यवस्था और मानवता दोनों सुरक्षित होंगे। इससे न ही अन्य लोगों को चोरी के लिए बढ़ावा मिलेगा और रामनाथ को कठोर सजा।)
bahut hi achcha sujhav
Sarkar ka paisa le duboge be tum sab 😂😂
Right sir
Here is a summary of the video in bullet points:
Key Issues Discussed:
* Men's Rights:
* The case of Atul Subhash, an AI engineer who committed suicide due to alleged harassment and false accusations by his wife and in-laws.
* The lack of gender-neutral laws in India, particularly regarding men's rights.
* The misuse of laws like Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
* Manipur Violence:
* The ongoing conflict between the Meitei and Kuki communities in Manipur.
* The Supreme Court's order to the Manipur government to provide details of property damage and encroachment.
* The need for a truth and reconciliation mechanism to address the violence and restore peace.
* Secularism:
* The Allahabad High Court judge's alleged hate speech against minority communities.
* The importance of judicial independence and impartiality in upholding secular values.
Other Points:
* A hypothetical dilemma about a man stealing a life-saving medicine due to financial constraints.
* A discussion on ethical considerations and the importance of critical thinking.
* An assignment for viewers to write a 250-word answer to a given question.
👍
Sir mppsc के छात्रों के साथ बहुत अन्याय हो रहा है आप uppsc bpsc के लिए इतना सपोर्ट करते हैं थोड़ी आवाज mppsc के लिए भी उठा दीजिए यहां पर आरक्षण का मुद्दा 5 साल से चल रहा है और परिणाम की कोई उम्मीद नहीं दिखती है आंदोलन करने के लिए स्टूडेंट पॉलिटिक्स का सक्रिय होना जरूरी है जिसे प्रदेश सरकार ने स्टूडेंट्स पॉलिटिक्स खत्म करके पहले ही बंद कर दिया है ।
हमें न मार्गदर्शन मिलता है न कि सपोर्ट
तारीख पर तारीख का डायलॉग एक दम फिट बैठता है
18 December को हम लोग आयोग पर शांतिपूर्ण आंदोलन करने वाले हैं।
आपसे सपोर्ट की आशा रखते हैं 🙏🏻
It's injustice against please raise hand for our brother Atul shubhash
Dilemmas:
Individual interest vs Social Interest
Utilitarianism vs Integrity towards society
Self interest vs human value
Suggestions:
To talk of other alternative mechanism to ensure his wife well being to the person
Ramlal pahle shopkeeper se apni situation ko explain kare ge or help mang sakte h agr shopkeeper help krne ke liye ready ho jaye tab tu thik h warna or kese person yeh govt initiative se help ki demand kr sakte h yeh best tarika rahega chori se...
Thank you dear sir ♥️♥️♥️
govt cannot provide help instant
But try tu kr sakte h
ये बात बिल्कुल सही है कि पहले महिला के साथ अत्याचार होता था जिसको देखते हुए हमारी कानून महिला को विभिन्न डायवर्सिटी के तहत सुरक्षा प्रदान करती है ।लेकिन हाल के कई मामले में यह कानून का missuse हो रहा है। थोरी सी कानून में प्रोविजन की जरूरत है जैसे रैप,दहेज,etc के मामलों में
Chori se jyada important kisi person ki jaan hai
Because wo injection hazzaro mil jayenge lekin kisi ki jaan ek hi hoti hai
Agar emergency me hame koi es type ka kadam uthana pade to ye galat nhi hoga
Baad me ham apni galti ke liye maafi mang sakte hai
Dilemma -
responsibly for family vs moral values
Life of individual vs values
1)He can take help from medical shopkeeper and try to convince him or her and can explain that he will pay shopkeeper's money in future
2) can take help from other people who present in medical shop
0:01 good afternoon sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤
3:14 Sir, according to me, in this case, we have to discuss both perspectives of the people involved. According to the shopkeeper, the job done by Ramnath is wrong. However, from Ramnath’s perspective, he wanted to save his wife’s life. Sometimes, we do things that are illegal but for a good purpose. We have to think like humans and understand why a person does something illegal; there is usually a reason. For example, in this case, Ramnath wanted to save his wife’s life, invoking Article 21 (Right to Life).On the other hand, if we follow the concept of good governance, the Rs 1 lakh should be paid by the government as a responsible government through multiple schemes or any other method. I am neutral in this case because both the shopkeeper and Ramnath are right in their own ways. However, I believe that life is the most important thing. The shopkeeper should consider why Ramnath did something illegal. The shopkeeper should think beyond profit and act humanely because God made humans to help each other. If the shopkeeper has a shop, it means he has multiple injections. If one injection goes to a person who can’t pay for it, I don’t think he will face a very big loss. I accept that it is the shopkeeper’s money, but he should also think about saving a life.Another solution could be that the shopkeeper talks to Ramnath and gives him a job or time to repay the Rs 1 lakh if the government does not pay the money. Thank you so much, sir. Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 ❤❤.
13:19 IPC 302 is equals to section 101 of BNS and section 498a of IPC is equals to section 85 and 86 in BNS
17:00 The writer gives a very nice argument and solution. First of all, in this case, it is a harassment case involving Atul Subhash, who was an AI engineer in Bengaluru. The Dowry Act case is being heard in the Jaunpur family court, and he had to travel daily for the hearings, incurring regular expenses. Atul’s wife has done a very seamless job of accusing her husband, who was working for her family. In his suicide video, he mentioned that his wife and her family have no permission to touch his body. In the video, he apologized to his parents, saying he could not sustain himself anymore. He also mentioned the extra charges imposed by the judge for the case.Overall, I want to ask one question: What is the meaning of law? Law is for the welfare of people. In this case, where is the welfare? Articles 14 to 18 of the Indian Constitution guarantee the Right to Equality. Where is the equality? Every person is equal in the eyes of the law. The word “equality” has become a joke because of certain individuals and a few judges.if a person is not able to earn money, how can he give money to his wife? After divorce, if the wife has the right to remarry, she should do so. If she chooses not to remarry, how can the husband be expected to support her financially? In this case, Atul’s wife allegedly told him to commit suicide, making her responsible for his death. This makes her a criminal. The Karnataka police have arrested Atul’s brother-in-law, mother-in-law, and wife. Does anyone have an idea of how the case is progressing? Despite the evidence, including the suicide video and the evidence, including the suicide video and note provided by Atul’s brother, why is the court not taking a decision? This indicates a failure of the Right to Equality. At the end, I want to mention that I am requesting each and every female to please not do this in the future. Think about the person you married and how your actions affect them. I am not talking about all females, but a few do behave this way. We need to change the judicial system to ensure that the Right to Equality is truly equal.
Thank you so much sir. Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤
29:02 thank you so much sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤
Dukandar se bolkar help legen. Jitana paisa mere pass hoga vo dedegen aur jo baki rahega usko dhire dhire chukane keliye bolegen. Par chori nahi karegen.
In one side we are fighting for equal rights for men and women . Other side we are providing alimony . If women is already in job what are the requirement of alimony . Alimony should based on women family income . her income also .
1.झूठा केस करवाने,करने , झूठा फैसला देने वाले को कम से कम दस साल की जेल हो ।
2 नेटवर्क वीडियो रिकॉर्डर से कोर्ट रूम के हरएक फैसला की रिकॉर्डिंग हो , पेशकार के ऊपर भी एक कैमरा लगा हो,सभी जांच सार्वजनिक हो,
तभी थोड़ा डर लगेगा l 😢
Namaskar Sir....
Its about means and end.sir ye chori sahi hai kyunki is chori se ek Insan ki Jaan Bach rahi hai aur us ek lakh rupaye se shopkeeper ki Jaan Ko koi nuksan nahin hoga aur vah uncle ji bhi bad mein unko vah paise de sakte hain to baad m chori bhi nhi rahegi fir
Thankyou sir🙏
Dilemma
Love vs honesty
Life vs social responsibility
Short term benefit vs long term harm
As per situation ramnath ne sahi Kiya
But later ramrath ki responsibility hai ki wo khud se jakar bole ki chori maine ki hai then apologize kare
Through social funding chemist bale bande ko full payment karen
Jai Hind Sir ❤
सर उनका चुराना सही होगा क्योकि पत्नी के सही होने के बाद वे अपना खेत /जमीन का एक हिस्सा बेंचकर पैसे लौटा दें और बाद मे दुकानदार से माफ़ी मांग लें जिससे उनकी ईमानदारी भी बनी रहेगी और जान भी बच जाएगी और उनका प्यार भी बना रहेगा-i think that's right 👍👍
FR, emotions , feelings, dignity of mans left the discussion.
Thank you sir for discussion 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 amazing discussion ☺️
सही है कानून को गहराई से जांच अधिकारी को जांच करनी चाहिए
Thank you sir 😊😊🙏🙏
Sir ,unhone shi kya wife ke thik hone ke bad apne khet bechkr Paisa Chuka dengai or ooo agar yaisa nhi karte to may be unki wife ka Jaan bhi ja sakti thi or koi rules kisi ke Jaan se bdhkar nhi ho sakta so Ramnath ne shi kya
किसी व्यक्ति की जान बचाना हमारी जिम्मेदारी होनी चाहिए,
ऐसे में की गई चोरी आपने आप में गलत उद्देश के साथ नहीं की गई परंतु चोरी चोरी ही है बूढ़े व्यक्ति को उपयुक्त मामले के बारे में स्वयं पुलिस को अवगत कराना चाहिए और अपने आगे के निर्णय को सरकार पर सौपना चाहिए,
सरकार भी सुनिश्चित करें कि उस व्यक्ति को सांकेतिक रूप में सजा दी जाएं,(14 दिन या 20 दिन बुज़ुर्ग की सेहत को ध्यान में रख कर)
व प्राइवेट मेडिकल फॉर्म को उनके हुई नुकसान की भरपाई वेलफेयर फंड से की जाए ताकि प्राइवेट इंटीटीज़ का विश्वाश सरकार पर बना रहें|
14/20 days are too, punishment like essay or society help, Or any social duty like Gardening, cleaning and security.
@thermogram8762 बिल्कुल आपकी बात का में मान रखता हूं परंतु सरकार को यह भी सुनिश्चित करना होगा कि ऐसा कृत्य बाकियों के लिए उदाहरण न बन जाएं,
उपयुक्त पहलुओं को ध्यान में रख कर दी गई सज़ा कम है जिसका कारण चोरी के उद्देश का उचित होना है,
अगर फिर भी ये सजा ज्यादा है तो इसे तब लागू किया जाए जब पेशेंट अपना ध्यान खुद रखने योग्य हो जाए, - (1 लाख रुपए की दवा, मेडिकल पर काम काने वाले कर्मचारी का मानसिक तनाव,सामाजिक व्यवस्था में एक अनैतिक उदाहरण प्रस्तुत करना)
Good morning sir 🌞
Thanks Guru dev 😊
सर कॉमन्स से बात है अगर वो इंजेक्शन चुरा भी लेते हैं तो पकड़े जाएंगे।एंड this is also wrong activity
So firstly he requested from doctor to suggest govt initiative for old age, Poors and incapable person (article 39)to buy High cost medicine. And secondly he need to requested from shopkeeper to provide medicine new it's urgent and give surety with integral trust that he will pay him money as soon as possible.
Thank you sir ji good afternoon 💗
Stakeholders:-
Ramnath, patient, pharmacist, doctor.
Issues and dilemmas -law vs life
Love vs integrity
Emotional affection vs ethical responsibility
Personal interest vs public interest
Values- love, compassion, priority to human life.
Justification:-
Upyogitavad - life is greater than money.
Situation:- last option,emergency.
Bad me ramnath ko pharmacist ko assurance dena chahiye ki vah saare paise return kar dega.
Pharmacist maan jata hai to thik hai.
Vrna ramnath ko khud surrender kar dena chahiye aur police ko saari situation batana chahiye jisse charge sheet me allegation lage.
Esse patient ki jaan bhi Bach jayegi rule of law bhi serve ho jayega.
Doctor ki bhi kuch responsibility hai
Ramnath aur uski wife dono bahut gariv hai to unhe aayushmaan bhart yojana jisme senior citizens ke liye special provisions hai
Uska labh dilana chahiye.
Ya us mahnge injection ka alternate use karna chahiye. Ya kisi Anya yojana(govt. Help) ka labh dilana chahiye.
Perfect 🌟 I’ve read all the comments but government schemes wala point Kisine nhi Uthaya , it would have been a perfect ans if Ramnath kisi officer ke pass Gaya Hota , in this situation there are only two people involved, Ramnath and medical wale bhaiya
Yes i will convene to shopkeeper but he is not understand my situation then will move to other shops but no one can understand then i will decide one person can fight with death so their life is important that perticular moment so i think when i should theft because life is more important that time then she /he is get better then any situation we can handle because life is very precious and all is fair in love .....😂
pahle dukandar se aapni condition ke bare mai batana chaiye jitna ho sake utna paise unko de denge taki chori ka nobat na aaye dukandar ko netitikta ke khatir unki help karni chaiye
If wo old man Injection ki mangni karta to shayad dukandar deta ya nahi bhi deta ..kuchh keh nahi sakte aur waha Unki wife ko bachane k liye emergency me injection jaroori tha to ethics k anusar bhale hi usne chori ki lekin usne apni wife ko bachaya ....
Hala ki usne chori ki lekin jab bhi 1-2 months me uske pas paise ka jugad ho jaye ya kama le tab use lauta dene chahiye aur us dukandar se mafi bhi mang Leni chahiye...☺️☺️
Sir it's a debate about means vs ends .
The end is right ( Caring for your loved ones )
But the means is not right ( stealing)
While it can be justified by teleology but it is unjustified by deontology as stealing can never be justified. Moreover stealing will cause a slippery slope .
I would follow the Gandhian philosophy:- If the means is right , the end itself will be right.
So the stealing by ramnath will be wrong , even if his intention is right.
@@rameshprasad7660 Sir, would you do the same if it was your mother or father?
@@rameshprasad7660 our answers in upsc should not be too idealistic but realistic with suggestions for achieving the ideal.
This is called Heinz Dilemma. This theory is given Educational psychologist Kohlberg. Kohlberg gives the theory of moral development in human into different stages.
Ramlal ko chori nhi krni chahiye thi bcz Injection ka price ₹ 1,00,000 tha to medical wale ko pta lg jaiyega and phir Ramlal k liye ye or Muskil ho Jaiyega
But Ramlal try krta to medical wala usse udhar de skta tha jisse wo police case se bch jata or ushki wife ka bhi Treatment ho jata
Chori Glt h but chori kr li h to ramlal ko glti maan leni chahiye and as soon as possible return kr dena chahiye
Thank you sir ❤
Misuse to har law ka hota hi hai chahe vo kisi bhi gender ki protection ke liye ho . But when an educated & awared women like her misuse these laws it deprived thousands of vulnerable, uneducated women from their rights ,
Bachpan me ek Story suni thi bhediya aaya bhediya aaya but bhediya kabhi nahi ata tha but ek din sach me a gya but gav Walo ne bat nhi mani this is how misuse of laws decrease the trust
Vese chori nhi krni chahiye lekin agr dukan vale se jo pese h un peso ko dekar dva leni chahiye thi jo pese bchate use dheerw dheere de de ni chahiye 😊 thanks for editorial discussion sir 🙏🏻 😊😊
Saving his wife's life is important. His intention was to save her life not stealing
Ramlal ko chori nhi krni chahiye thi,unhe dukandaar se baat krni chahiye thi apni pareshani btani chahiye thi, legally wrong ❌ kiya h ramlal ne, but he done all for saving life of his wife ❤
sir i think unhone jo kiya wo sahi kiya....because we can not measure someone's life with money ,1lakh ki injections se kisi ki jaan bachai jaa sakti h to ismein kuch galat nhi h...**wese bhi hum medicines banate hi isliye h ki logo ki jaan bachai ja sake**...aur chori ki baat kare to wo baad mein chae to khud surrender kar sakte h apni chori k baare mein jab unki wife ki treatment acche se ho jaye .
Stealing is wrong if it happened any way to save anyone or for love ones.ramalal save his wife's life but wrong way,he not aware about government schemes about medical support.ramlal take help from other people, ramlal take help from Government shopkeeper that provide equal quality with less price medicines.
Government responsibility to provide awareness about medical schemes so that people use schemes in emergency situation to save their love ones life.
Mai govt.fund ke Paisa se injection provide karwa dunga....phir apne upar ke adhikari se baat kar ke pm janarogya me uska naam jurva dunga....🙏
Ramlal should negotiate with the shopkeeper.He must have something that can be kept as collateral to take shopkeeper in to confidence. He can return his money in installments later.
On the other hand if shopkeeper denied to help in anyway ,by taking collatral also. Then his stealing the injection can be justified. He is stealing to save someone's life
,so it is for good cause
.
Whatever Ramlal did is legally wrong but ethically true because he save life ...to save life is the priority of person.
Sir agar or koi rasta nhi tha to right h but ramnat ko fir medical vale ko Jake bta dena chahiye ki chori ki h(isse phle medical vale se ychna krni chahiye thi ki m rupy lota dunga bina puchhe sidha chori Kiya vo glt tha)
1. Ydi ramlal ptni ke alava kisi or ki Jan ke liye bhi yhi krta to yh priskrit sukhvad se shi hoga
2. Uska sadhy pvitr h but vo medical vale ko suchh bta kr dire dire rupy chukane ya galti ki sja apne ke liye tyar hota h to sadhan pvitr mana jayega
3. Iske example se visvshniyta bdhegi or ye morality ka ullnghn bhi nhi hoga
Prntu sbse phle ramlal ke ak bar medical vale se puchna chahiye tha ki mere pass jo rupay h ve le lijiye baki m bad me lota dunga ydi medical vale ne mna kiya hota to dusra rasta apnana chahiye tha
So bina phle kuchh puchhe chori krna wrong tha
145 days completed
Consistently ❤❤❤
0:01 good afternoon sir and PW team Jay Hind Jay Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤❤
First article kis newspaper ka hai ???
Presently he must take the injection but by taking consideration to his moral values as well and can negotiate with the shopkeeper and the amount can be taken later from the old man in installments
By doing so his love , affection towards his wife and the ethical values as an individual can be taken care
Good morning sir ji❤
Kisi Ki Jaan bachane Ke Liye had Tak Jana chahie Baat Apne per Aaye To Chori na Karni chahie Hamare Najar Mein Jaan badi hai jaan bachne ke bad Bata Dena chahie ki maine Chori ki bus my opinion
I do absolutely agree with the writer of the first article. Recently I came across with such case where the girl who's a long time girlfriend with my friend but the situation in their family doesn't allow them to be husband and wife neither they had any promise to marry each other in the coming future. Now that girl is threatening him to marry her or she'll file a case about rape under false pretense of marriage. She's about to lodge the case. How will rhe law protect him in this case?
Stealing is unethical but in the case of ramlal will change the perspective life is first priority. jain philosophy supported this in ankenkantbad and syadbad.
Sir hamesa ye nahi dekhna chahiye ki glat kya sahi kbhi us kaam ke piche ki intention bhi dekhni chahiye meri nazr agr uth kr le jata hain sahi hai
Sir Bpsc exam dene gya tha question paper hi nhi mila pure do ghente class m bathe rhen tb bhi nhi mila 5th floor 4th hall, bapu pariksha parishar maurya bihar patna😢
Sir aap bhi ans bata dijiya kregi ethics ke NXT day
Sir I respectfully you and our community
Sir even Jagdish jangid sir ki class na continue ho sakti ho to kisi other sir se kara diya kare jaise apki class miss nhi hoti hai
Most better for us
Sir my riquest
Yours obbidiently. Prince singh
National commision of MEN.(constitutional body).
First of all humanity should be given priority. He must have save her wife' life. So in this case we have no accusations regarding ethics & morality. After saving her life, if he comes back at the shop then he should elaborate whole process.
Good morning sir ji 🙏🙏
Good morning sir 🙏
Mai bhi yahi krta. Chahe jo bhi hota
Dukandar se bolkr lena chaiye...may b shopkeeper will understand his problem and help him...
Sir ji plzz pw hindi medium batch me live aaiye
Ramnath ji ko injection chura ke le jana self ki moral values ke against ja rhe but life Bach rhi wo jyada important hai, ramnath ji me honesty toh hai integrity ke khilaaf hai.
I agree karta hu ramnath ji ne galat Kiya parantu ramnath ji ne bachho ke future ke bare socha aur khud ko musibat me daal diya at that time ramnath ji super hero aapne wife ki nazro aur bachho ki me bhi shopkeeper ko loss ho gya agar shopkeeper empathy feel kar rha ho toh shopkeeper bhi ramnath ji ki saharana jarur Karega
Jo dusra person baad m aaya tha maanlo wo usska bhai hua toh help ho jayegi thank you sir ji ❤
Sir from where I can get the model answer of this question?
Ramnath ji ka injection chori se le jana sahi ya galt ?
Step-1-----Wife ki life save karna jaruri hai , paise vo bad me bhi pay kar sakte hai
Step-2----Genuine reason pr chori karna chori nhi hota for example beggar dwara roti churakar pet bharna chori nhi balki society pr chot hai itni inequality hona .
Step-3---- public health sector ki failure hai ki unko aisa karna pd rha hai
Good afternoon sir 🙏
Haa ye sahi to hai ethical view se but law ke according wrong hai. Agar jaldi jarurat hai to le ja sakte hai per baad me dukandar se bol sakte hai ki me apke paise thode thode karke lota dunga. Goverment schemes ki help li ja sakti hai. Yaha some values life, love, sympathy, and business profit ke beech contredection hai.
Ramlal act is immoral but is priority to save her wife life show humanity. In this situation, Ramlal should get back to chemist and apologise for his immoral act and ready to get penalise.
There should be laws that if any women claim false case so they should not be allow to claim next false case. and we can study how other countries are handling these situations and can integrate them as per indian situations
Sahi hai Jaan bacha lo unhone
ramlal k paas agr koi option nhi bchta h to fir...chori krna shi kyuki love family priority and utilitierian aproch
Is se khi bdh kr kisi person ki life ko bachane ki.liye glt raste k use glt hone sbhwna nhi rkhta h
Mean vs end
Honesty vs dishonesty
Kantian and Gandhian philosophy if your karma is bad then significantly consequences will be negatives.
Dilemma involved in this case.
1.Life vs dead
2.Upholding morality vs erosion of morality
3. Conflict of consciousness
Conscious not permitted vs loss of life.
Options available to person.
1. Convince the shopkeeper pay amount later by adreessing the grievances.
1. Borrowing money from others might be relative or villagers.
3. If injection available at govt hospital then seek from there.
4. Taking the help from NGo , civil workers or public servants.
5. Seeking help of money through social media like facebook, twitters ..etc
First of all toh sir,as ramanath will tell the chemist about the emergency and urgent need to save her wife,he can seek help from the seller,chori Krna to thik nhi h ase trust lose hoga and loss of economy would be seen agr similar cases increase hote h to,,ramnath convience kr skta h , injection le skta h ye ensure kr k ki vo future me payment krega .
this is again abt means vs end
in first instance ramlal did was wrong but after saving his wife life he with wife can go to medical shop and explain whole situation and repay the money in installments.
2. as is poor man there are many schemes of govt to help them he could directly take the benefit of those schemes to save life of his wife.
Sir, there are certain schemes of govt to give direct benefits.
Second to take loan from others.
Third he can request to med owner.
Mera ye opinion h ki un citizen ne chori bcz' unke pass paise nhi the itne agr unke pass paise hote to chori nhi krte ye baat bhi shi h ki us injection se unki wife ki jaan bach jayegi. Lekin us chori se us dukan wale ka bhi nuksan hoyega but ek nuksan se kisi vyakati ki jaan bachti h to ye glt nhi ho skta h
If women earning money then only children education upto 18 yrs of age should maintain by husband and grant by court. All other grant of money should be familial discussion.
Can speak to owner that he can pay amount on monthly basis.By this no one get loss old man's wife survives,for medical shop owner also recieves payment for medicine.
Sir I am In class 8th. Does your editorial is beneficial for me?
🙏🙏🙏
Ramnath can utilise the government schemes such as jan arogya yojana their upto 5 lakh govt provide , for concession medicine he can use janaushadi kendra . Shopkeeper also invested in that medicine so it is wrong although his intentions are right . He may habitually follow this for his benefits .
Good morning Sir, Stealing is morally Wrong but Socially right as society is driven by love and compassion. As our constitution provide the protection of life(Article21) and Public assistance in certain case(Article41) it is also duty of state to make arrangement as well. For this, State has started a scheme PMJAY(where family get 5lakh financial assistance for medical expanse). He can be encouraged by doctor to get benefits of this scheme. Stealing is wrong till accused is not accepting their crime and not willing to pay back. With the help of above scheme he can pay back or he could take help of crowdfunding or community funding as we have seen in case of Atul Kumar where he denied admission in IIT due to Financial constraint but later SC intervened and got admission.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🙏
Good afternoon sir
Stealing injection,in pros - kant' absolute duty
In cons - Gandhi's साध्य और साधन की पवित्रता
My opinion is that ramnath should collect money with online donations after that he informed shopkeeper and pay the amount
Mahesh
i prefer gandhian philosophy where means are equally important as to ends
and for me it is wrong to do stealing, one can arrange it from pleading and getting funds through crowdfunding and other means but for me stealing is wrong.
Its a delimma
Ramlal should tell his situation to the pharmacist .
He should gave the money whatever he had to pharmacist and rest will be paid soon .
He done theft for saving a life its not crime,his intentions were good but the mean was not good.
So he should tell his situation ho shopkeeper and seek help from him.
Leaving everything apart lets extend this , wo 1 lakh ka injection legaya magar dukan chalane wala owner tho tha nahi just a job holder , who will pay that 1 lakh ? Obviously shop owner jo kaam pe tha us waqt uski salary se kaatenge na . Ameer apna noqsan kabhi nahi karte
Yadi ramnath ji shopkeeper se kisi government scheme ke bare me puche jo financial help provide kar sakte hai,ya phir unke gao me SHG ke mamber se kuch financial help mil jaye to unhe chori nahi karni padegi , aur same se dava be mil jaye ge aur unki wife ki jan bhi Bach gayegi.
उनके पास समय नहीं है, इंडक्शन जल्द ही देना है।
I am following up since 9th standard how i definition sir my answer writing is so improved by you sir my board exam I am performing very well sir thx 🙏🙏
Ise ham chhori nahi kah sakte sir ham jante hai ese Bina puchhe le jana galat bat hai but agar kisi jhuth se chori se kisi ki jan bachti hai ye ise galat nahi bol sakte ramlal old man hai to kah sakte inki majboori hai agar koi adult hota to jarur vo jugar kar sakta tha jaise kisi se lekar treatment karvana fir usko treatment ke bad earn karke de sakta tha