docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScqjJqT0Zaiiq2r9dprQD6U0K59RLOLQfqq0gh-TBKax1vQAw/viewform?usp=sharing Join Current Affairs Plus Course by Sumit Rewri Sir www.pw.live/study/batches/current-affairs-plus-by-sumit-sir-708041/batch-overview?activeSection=Description
Stakeholder. - senior doctor , junior doctor, hospital, healthy person , 5 ill person, society Ethical issue 1Corporate ethics 2.Medical oaths follow krna 3.Healthy person right vs ill person life saving 4. Constitution values violations_ freedom , equality , justice 5.Personal integrity and morality 6.Right to life and personal liberty violation Option 1 :-if senior doctor k sath m jati hu to Pros. 5 ill person ki jan bchya ja skta hai 2 utilatrism approch - benefit for many people 3. Sadya pavitr hona chaia bhale sadhan kch bi ho. - Karl Marx Cons - medical ethics ka violation - hospital ki integrity risk m. Us healthy person ki jan chli jan usko. Fundamental right. - article 21 right to life s deprive Krna Rule of law ka violation - senior doctor ki will s decision nii lene chaia . Constitution values and law k according Healthy person ki life lena crime hai jiski senior doctor ko saja bi ho skti hai and sath muje bi punishment milegi Personal morality issue - 2. Agr m junior doctor k sath jati hu to healthy person ki life bch skti hai Pros - corporate ethics ko bnaye rhkna Society m harmony bni rhna and public trust on hospital, doctor and staff 3. Ensure accountability of medical personnel 4. Lawand constitution according m safe hu muje punishment nii milegi Cons usse 5 ill person ki jan skti hai My opniom m 2nd option k sath hu kyuki 5 ill person ki jan bchane k lia m other hospital and health department official s coordinate kia ja skta hai une ill person ki condition k bare btaya ja skta hai and unki life save krne k lia brain dead person k organ lgaye ja skte hai . Iske lia brain dead person ki family s consent lene k lia une smja skte hai Lekin ese kisi person ki life lena other life saves k lia usse n keval us healthy person k fundamental right ka violation but yeh ek bda crime ha iske lia punishment bi milegi sath hi medical personnel p public trust m.bi giravat aayegi Corporate governance ko strong krne and accountability bnaye rhkne k lia transperancy lana chaia
1. As per Kant - Right to means - Junior doctor is right --> He focused on mean 2. As per utilitarian principle Senior doctor is right --> He focused on END means Overall ( long term ) benifits
जूनियर डॉक्टर द्वारा उठाया गया प्रश्न स्वाभाविक हैं, किंतु किसी एक के सहयोग से यदि हम 5 अन्य लोगों की जान बचा सकते हैं तो इसमें बुरा कुछ भी नहीं, हमें सुनिश्चित करना होगा कि हम उपर्युक्त व्यक्ति को परिस्थितियों से अवगद कराए व उसे संभावित चुनौतियों को बताए, क्योंकि देह सम्बन्धी अंततः निर्णय उस व्यक्ति का ही होना चाहिए|(बिना किसी दबाववश)
Sir yha dilemma hai between individualism and socialism, Mere ya opinion hai ki vyakti samaj ka member hota hua bhi apni vishesh pehchan rakhta hai or uska apna rights hota hai jo samaj ka liya sacrifice nhi kiya ja sakta isliya us health man ka organs nhi lene chahiye but agar koi aisi chij ho jo individual ko negative impact na kra or society ka hit ma ho to usa kiya ja sakta hai for example agar healthy person apni marji sa apni aak kidney dena chahye to aak vyakti ki life bach jayagi यह दीप अकेला स्नेह भरा मदमाता, पर इसे भी पंक्ति को समर्पित कर दो❤ अज्ञेय 😊
Hame sabse phle Healthy person ki will samjhna chahiye ki kya vaha un 5 unhealthy persons ko help krna chahta h organ donate krk ya nhi, agr vo chahta h to vo kr skta h, but agar use doctor force kre to vo crime hoga, or medical terms k according galat bhi, Second aspect yeh hoga ki sabhi k individual rights h article 21 right to life and personal liberty and others To hum esa decisions bna skte h jisme nuksaan kam or benefit jyada ho jese ki healthy person liver donate kre to use bhi nuksaan nhi h jyada or dusre bhi bach jaye Third aspect according to utilitarian theory - vo 5 log bach jayenge to overall economy m benefit hoga unki skills and education k hisab se Thank you sir 🙏🙏🙏
2:15 mere hisab se junior doctor sahi hai Agar hume 5 logon ki life bachani hai to.uske.liye kisi ek ko jo healthy hai usko sacrifice.nahi kar sakte Doctor kisi or hospital se sampark karke arrange kar sakte hai Jaise kahi par accidental patient aaye ho, jo ki dead ho , ya koi or patient jiski life risk me ho Uske bhi organ liye ja sakte hai, Ya fir jinko organ chahiye unke koi relative jo apni marji se organ donate karna chahe puri guidelines ko follow karte huye. Everyone's life is equally important so we cannot sacrifice any single person for the benefit of other 5 person. Thank you sir for the case study question 😊😊😊😊😊
Sir ji hum pehle us vyakti se puchna chahenge ki kya wo apne organ dene ke liye agree hai , agree krne per senior dr. Ke sath anyatha kisi dusre healthy person ko dhundenge ....
Ethics case dilema---- Sir, jaruri nhi ki healthy person ka sab organ needy patient me successfully function kare , so First try karenge ki Organ store bank se available karay , if its not possible then , Healthy person se unki concent leker aisa kr sakte hai jisse major life save ho sake
Senior doctor is right because agar 1 person se 5 person ki jaan bachai ja Sakti hai but junior doctor ka view jyada sahi hai kyu ki 1 person ke piche unki family bhi to hoti hai Ho sakta hai wah person apne ghar ka akela kamane wala ho aur usase hi uska family chalata ho
Mahatma gandhi's view-both ends and means justified the thing Utilitarian approach(Jeremy Benthom)-great benefit to more no.of people(should be transplanted) Kantian principle -there is not treat to other person as ameans to justified ends Constitution-Art-21- Right to live with dignity Right to choose, .Right to health etc And then According to me ,There should be transplanted because(Healthy person-Myself) Priority to work for society so it should transplanted.
As per dentological approach there is no wrong way to do right thing so junior doctor rihgt in this situation acc to utalitarian approach greater good is more important than individual so one person save the life of another 5 person But in this situation individual chice mattter that he want to donate organs if he agree then i go with senior doctor Rather than i go with junior doctor because individual right to life with dignity matter and also there is no guarantee one person donate his organ make all healthier or save
Sir dono doctor me se kisi ek ko sahi bolna sahi hoga healthy person ka organ lekar 5 persons ko beshaq life save Kiya ja sakta doner ka right to individual hai o de ya na de agar o organ de donate Kiya doner ka family musibat me aa sakte. Sir yaha kisi ka right ya kisi ek ko wrong nahi kaha ja sakta Thanks sir...
Over all out put dekhna chahiye but kisi bhi person self dignity ya khud jeene ka aadhikar hai Agar koi five persons family se jaise daughter ka husband, mother, father, sister ka husband, brother ke bacche aur vahi kamane wala ho home m iss situation m de dena m sahi manuga . 2nd situation Country ko koi dangerous khatra hai jo five persons bade par उन logo ko koi replacement nhi ya उन ki jagah nhi sakta hai, only one person heathy hai that time toh uss person self puch kar ya uss ki family se consult kar ke agar vo agree 👍 hai toh aap le sakte hai ya uss ki family me 10 log ussi se life jee rhe means kamane wala vahi ho toh nhi Lena chahiye person ke bachho ka future spoile ho sakta hai Iss place par dono docter sahi kahe rhe aapne aapne values , fundamental ke hisab se . Uss person ki bhi koi galti nhi chayhe toh help kar bhi sakta hai nhi bhi Thank you sir ji ❤
📌sir, as your statement not same organ for everyone, Better solution is find elder as well as more ill person among them and contribute his/her organ another 3 person. Not involve healthy outsider peasent. Why I choose elder? Youger can contribute more in GDP
" The whole situation is based on healthy person not on senior or junior doctor " Sir ye delima es parkar solve krenge ki jo healthy person ha us se sabse phele puche ge ki vo apne organ dene ko tyr ha kya kyunki uske upar 2 situation based 1- phele agr vo apne organ deta ha to 5 logo ki life bacti ha or uske family pr badley effect padega uske or agr vo family ki economics backbone ha to or jyda badley effect padega..... 2- situation agr vo apne organ deta ha to 5 logo ki life bachti ha or Pancho ke family bhi bhot khush hogi ...
bro the healthy person is came in hospital for heathcare not for organ donation😂😂😂 so there is no question here to ask that person to donate their organ .
Will go for other option, It will violete individuals right to life and no one go against it, Rahi baat dr.k samaj seva ki to unko last end tk kosis karna chahiye un patients ko bachane ki ,agr success nhi bhi hue to bhi ye rhega ki unse bna wo kiye .
Junior Dr. Key saath. Jinka kharab hai unka toh Kharab hi hai. But jo sahi hai unko kaise hum barbad kar saktey hai. Paitent agar khud se donate karna chahe toh alag baat hai uske liye hum unse ek baar request karke dekh saktey hai. Kyoun ki kidney wagera ka donation hota hai, but uske liye bhi bht sare procedures ko complete karna hoga. And doctors ka kaam hai without any emotion and influence apne service ko provide karna. And agar main Triage system ko bhi dekhu toh Dr. ka kaam hai jo paitents jaldi thik ho saktey hai unko thik karke discharge karna taki critical medical infrastructure par pressure kam pare.
Sir as per case study- we have to ask first to that healthy person about donation of organ as the person have rights to life. And this is depend on person's discretion that he/she wanted to donate or not. Then only 5 person's life can be saved.
Jan bach sakati hai Jo jisko jarurat hai vo isko Exchange kar sakte hai Example healthy patient donet your heart but other ill patients jiska heart thik hai lekin uska kidney thik nahi hai to vo ek dusre ke sath cooperat kar sakte hai
i am with junior doctor as dignity of life is paramount and here the utilitarian approach of Mr. Bentham i.e. greatest happiness in greatest number is not correct as per my belief system i believe in equality of dignity to everyone.
Junior doctor is right Beacause human being is treated as end in itself and not means to save others life... Senior doctors should use another method to save those patient and ask the help from their own relatives to donate the organ Life of every human is equally important
Junior Dr is right because every individual should have bodily autonomy, and he/she alone has the right to decide in respect of events that affect his/her physical body.
Kisi ke jivan ko bachane ke liye , dusre ke jivan ki bali dena these values ke against h :- 1) justice ke principle ke against. [ 1 bhi nirdosh ko saja nhi honi chahiye ] 2) Right to dignity in life [ Art. : 21] 3)Gandhi ka sadhan - sadhy ki pavitrata 4) kant ki sarvbhomikta ke sidhant ke virudh 5) uss person ki freedom of will nhi rahegi , bcoz uski body ke bare me decision uska hi hona chahiye 6) J S mill ki utilatrial approach ( manshik sukh sresth h ) ke against Hence junior Dr ki baat shi rahegi , hn agar vo vyakti self declaration se organ donate karta h to senior Dr ki baat mani jaa sakti h
Junior doctor is right because - 1. Jivn ke adhikar ka ullnghn hoga(art-21) 2.gandhi(sadhn sadhy pvitrta),mil(priskrit sukhvad),kant(sarvbhomikta sutr) aadi sidhanto se glt hoga 3.phchan aadhar pr phle mnusyta or bad me klyan aata h is hisab se bhi wrong 4.krtvy ki naitikta se bhi yh glt hoga 5.isse visvsniyta ki kmi aayegi log doctor ke pass nhi jayenge So, vykti ki bina anumti uske orgn nikalna = wrong Doctor ko koi or rasta nikalna chahiye jaise kisi donet ki body se ilaj , ya bio technik ka use krna
Sir I would like to Give my answer with one example from past Chandragupta Maurya followed chanakya But still in end he adopted Jainism (peace) By killing one we can sive five but in the end It will left remorse pain and regret and bad impact on humanity Only focusing on physical health is not enough we have to think about mental health after killing one person for five person. It impact on society ,her/her parents relatives we are indirectly killing more than we saved So do good have good this my personal opinion
जो एक हेल्थी व्यक्ति आया है क्या पता है अच्छा व्यक्ति हो और जो 5लोग को अंग की आवश्यकता है क्या पता उनमें से कोई मतलब उतना अच्छा व्यक्ति नहीं हो या उसने कोई क्राइम किया हो तो किसी एक हेल्थी मनुष्य के अंग को निकालकर 5 जिंदगी को बचाने के बाद भी उसे प्रकार की समाज सेवा नहीं मिलेगी क्योंकि हमने एक अच्छे व्यक्तियों को मार कर 5 में से कम से कम दो व्यक्ति ऐसे को बचाया है जो आगे चलकर क्राइम करेंगे और अच्छी जिंदगी है बर्बाद कर सकते हैं ऐसा भी हो सकता है
Sir I am with the junior doctor because this is his life and his body that he own and that is given by the god and the nature to him. So If five persons can be saved by organ transplantation of healthy person that is not the justice to the god and the nature.
Sir both doctors are right but junior doctor's argument theek hai aur doctors ko ek bar healthy person se organ donation k liye baat krni chahiye and other persons se bhi contact krena chahiye
Junior doctor. Ethical doesn't mean kill someone without his/her consent for larger betterment of society. Because it will lead to chaos in the society. And individuals right will be end .but our constitution giving preferences individuals .(art21)
1st to ask healthy person to donate their organs or not.because every person have right to live (art21).2nd connect with other hospitals for organs to save patients .senior doctor opinion harm to society , affect medical ethics, work against fundamental rights . junior doctor opinion follow hospital rule and regulations, respect fundamental rights.To save 5 patients live denger other unknown person live it's not right.other unknown person may be son, brother , husbend, father of a family who provide economic support to the family. I will support junior doctor.
thank you so much for your efforts on daily basis . tbh i get motivated from you as ur daily consistent with editorial discussion. it really means a lot to me sir.
This is a classic ethical dilemma that involves the principles of utilitarianism by senior doctor versus individual rights by the junior one. Sir in this situation the informed consent which is a basis of medical ethics should be upheld. Organ donation should be voluntary. Ultimately, no action can be deemed entirely right or wrong, but it is crucial to find a solution that respects both individual rights and the value of human life. A more thoughtful approach might be to explore all other alternatives, including waiting for organ donations from deceased individuals, to avoid taking such a drastic step.
Stakeholders- Senior doctor, junior doctors, healthy person and his family, 5 patients and their families, society. Issue Ek person ke organ 5 logo me kese lag sakte hai. Bahut saare issue ho sakte hai.jaise patient ka blood group match na kare ya patient ki body organ ko accept na kare. Healthy person ke 2.fundamental rights ka violation. Art. 21 3.Individual interest vs community interest. Work ethics Hippocratic oath Option 1 senior doctor decision +ve Upyogitavad -ve Violation of constitution, natural justice, Decision- this decision is wrong. Junior doctors should oppose this decision. 2nd option :- find other options like contact with other hospitals. Ese vyakti ke organ lene chahiye kiska brain dead ho ya vah kai saalo se coma me ho ya keval machine ke share jinda ho. Unki family se consent lekar in 5 patients ki jan bacha sakte hai
Healthy person ko saari situation batayege phir agar wo agree rha to , wo bhi agar wo 5th organ nhi balki jitne wo chahe , ya jitne organ donate karne ke baad bhi wo Healthy rhe , utne hi ...,other hand hm kisi another Healthy person ya organ ka management krenge
Here are the key points from the video "13 December 2024 | Editorial Discussion | Pakistan in Security Council, Untouchability, ULB": * Ethical Dilemma: A doctor faces a dilemma of saving five lives by harvesting organs from a healthy individual or respecting the individual's right to life. * Untouchability: The video discusses the origins and nature of untouchability, challenging the racial and occupational theories. It also explores Ambedkar's views on untouchability and his ideal society. * Pakistan in Security Council: The video analyzes Pakistan's potential role as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council, focusing on its likely actions and India's counterstrategies. * Urban Local Body Elections: The video discusses the importance of timely elections for urban local bodies and the challenges in conducting them, such as delimitation and reservation issues. It also highlights the need for an independent body to address these issues.
(1) junior doctor is write because every person has write to Life and his main behaviour is individualism but (2) Doctor is also write because hi wants to benefit majority 🙏🙏🙏🤞🤞🤞
Sir this is the case of informed consent. If the person agrees to donate the organs , then it can be done . But if the person disagrees then if we have to agree with him .
junior dr, bcz vo apne routine checkup ko aaya hai to do it ,dusri baat kya vo khud consent de raha ki yes i want to donate then it will good to transplant the organs but agar uske bina jaane dr. kar raha to ye violation hai uske rights ka , so it's all depend healthy person khud se donate karna chah raha yaa aap dr. uske bina jaane uske body ko use kar rhe . people should not use as means to an end
This is a tough situation, but I agree with the junior doctor. Every person has the right to live their life with dignity, as guaranteed by Article 21. Taking the life of an innocent person, just to save five others, is wrong. That person hasn’t done anything to deserve such a punishment. However, if the person is someone who has committed horrible crimes like murder or rape, then I might agree with the senior doctor because such a person has already harmed society. Still, doctors should try every other possible way to save the five patients, like finding emergency donors or using advanced medical techniques. Taking an innocent life shouldn’t be an option.
go with junior doctor individual have no fault even if take organ from them and transplant to other doing that 1)we voilate their fundamental right, 2) not neccesary that those health persons organ set in their patient's body chances of failure also from doing that we lose both healthy person and patient also 3) also complaint to the hospital authority about senior doctor of these type of behavior from doing that we follow our tradition that "100 gunegar chhut jaye par 1 nirdosh ko saja nahi honi chahiye" and for patient i tried and firnd the donor of oragn and not aafect any other healthy person
सर पहले उस हेल्दी पर्सन से बात करके उसको पेसेंट्स की कंडीशन बताएंगे फ़िर उससे कुछ पार्ट डोनेट करने को बोलेंगे जिसमें उसका भी ज़्यादा नुकसान न हो जैसे: लीवर, ब्लूड या कुछ और भी कंडिशन में जैसा दिया हो बाकी अन्यों के लिए और कुछ उपाय देखेंगे जैसे कोई ngo etc
Junior doctors k sath bcoz constitution provides right to lifr eith dignity if the person dont want to donate then we can't firce for donating ....if the person wants then we should approach the senior doctor and utilitarian principle
अनटचेबिलिटी पर जो राइटर ने फैक्ट दिए हैं वह गलत है।। अंबेडकर की बुक में अनटचेबल को क्षत्रिय बताया है जिसका प्रमाण उन्होंने देते हुए शांतिवन पर्व में उल्लेखित शूद्र राजा पेजवन का उदाहरणदिया है।। अनटचेबिलिटी का कारण उक्त वर्ग के सामाजिक बहिष्कार कापरिणाम था।।
Sir I think this is means vs end Jisme means kuch bhi ho end achieve ho jaega 5 life save krne ka I m with junior doctor as in this case senior didn't said abt taking permission from healthy patient to donate but to do it by himself which is against morality and doctor ethics as well as against right of individual to know . Thankyou
Junior doctor view is right as he is healthy person and another person don't have the right to get his organ without his consent As well as the patient who we receive organ they have to go immunosuppressive drug throughout their life without they will not sustain their live it also increase their expense and pain in their entire lifetime without giving much contribution to society either economic ,terms or social term( humanity)
Very simple answer bro jo five patients hain onke different different organs damage hain wase bi marne wale hain onko convince kro akele aadmi ko convince karne se easy bi ha koi ek convince ho gya toh oske organs baki char logu mein dal do aur jo oska organ kharab tha wo toh pahle hi aap ne bola different organ kharab hain sab mein🎉
First we will consult with that healthy individual if he wants to donate his organs for the sake of other patients life,,also it is unethical to just save other patients at the stake of one individuals personal life,as everyone have right to life , majorly it would be that man's decision or we can ask him to help others by donating specific organs with the condition his life won't be threatened.
नहीं sir यह doctor का ethics nahi he ki wo kisi ki life ko compare kare or jis tarh se bhartiya nyay व्यव्स्था ka yah ethics he ki 100 अपराधी सजा से बच जाए तो कोई बात नहीं पर किसी निर्दोष को सजा नहीं मिलनी चाहिए वैसे ही doctor का होता है
Sir senior doctor has utilitarian perspective that is greatest good for greatest no. Of people but junior doctor has invidualistic perspective. Acc. To me healthy person should be asked if he wants to donate and save 5 person or not . Otherwise it is against art. 21 right to life and against natural law which protects right to life and liberty.
I support junior doctor becoz mean should be positive and follow Gandhian principle kyki ek ki jaan lekar 4 jaan bachana pricipali tab shi nhi h jab wo poori tarah se healthy.
There was a dilemma before gandhi during NCM, if he continues the movement we might have achieved freedom decades before the actual time/date, but gandhi chose means that strictly follow the Ahimsa(means) over independence, as if the end is achieved through the immoral means it becomes the faith of that society and they react accordingly. In this case if the senior doctors are using one human as means without his/her consent it is against his human/fundamental right that is right to lifewith dignity but if the person wants to donate his/her organ with his conscience it is moral and justifiable. ULTIMATELY if it against his/her consent with conscience it should not no be done, it is against the ethics of duty of the doctors, because doctors are life saviour.
Firstly doctor must ask to healthy because it is right to dignity and to life of the individual without his consent it is illegal and against his fundamental rights . There are many way to save the life 5 people
Sir in my opinion junior doctor is right Because there is violation of right to life and no one have right to take life of others so there may be many solutions like exchanging of organs between ill persons and other solutions may be who have requirement of those oragns which are in bi numbers by single orngans a person may live like kidney it can be done
First to ask that healthy person whether he is ready or not because may be it's possible if he can allow for any one organ without his consent taking out all organs can be misleading and crime ; searching for other other alternatives through technology used by other countries; arrangement of some persons who are in great need of money but though he/she may not allow for all organs ....this is my view
Junior doctor because doctor guarantee is to make unhealthy to healthy.but not make healthy into unhealthy. Alternatively only one people can be saved through organ donation if such person agreed to do it .
Sir junior dr ke sath coz us jagah mai khud ko sochu to v aise ka virodh kruga , aur sir organ dene ke baad v marij mar skta hai, aur sir yah constitutional ethics, ke khilaf hai.....aur sir agar Bach v jaye to eske liye us person ka consent lena jaruri....etc ke conclusion se junior ke sath🙏
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScqjJqT0Zaiiq2r9dprQD6U0K59RLOLQfqq0gh-TBKax1vQAw/viewform?usp=sharing
Join Current Affairs Plus Course by Sumit Rewri Sir
www.pw.live/study/batches/current-affairs-plus-by-sumit-sir-708041/batch-overview?activeSection=Description
Thank you sir 😊
Stakeholder. - senior doctor , junior doctor, hospital, healthy person , 5 ill person, society
Ethical issue
1Corporate ethics
2.Medical oaths follow krna
3.Healthy person right vs ill person life saving
4. Constitution values violations_ freedom , equality , justice
5.Personal integrity and morality
6.Right to life and personal liberty violation
Option 1 :-if senior doctor k sath m jati hu to
Pros. 5 ill person ki jan bchya ja skta hai
2 utilatrism approch - benefit for many people
3. Sadya pavitr hona chaia bhale sadhan kch bi ho. - Karl Marx
Cons - medical ethics ka violation - hospital ki integrity risk m.
Us healthy person ki jan chli jan usko. Fundamental right. - article 21 right to life s deprive Krna
Rule of law ka violation - senior doctor ki will s decision nii lene chaia . Constitution values and law k according
Healthy person ki life lena crime hai jiski senior doctor ko saja bi ho skti hai and sath muje bi punishment milegi
Personal morality issue -
2. Agr m junior doctor k sath jati hu to healthy person ki life bch skti hai
Pros - corporate ethics ko bnaye rhkna
Society m harmony bni rhna and public trust on hospital, doctor and staff
3. Ensure accountability of medical personnel
4. Lawand constitution according m safe hu muje punishment nii milegi
Cons usse 5 ill person ki jan skti hai
My opniom m 2nd option k sath hu kyuki 5 ill person ki jan bchane k lia m other hospital and health department official s coordinate kia ja skta hai une ill person ki condition k bare btaya ja skta hai and unki life save krne k lia brain dead person k organ lgaye ja skte hai . Iske lia brain dead person ki family s consent lene k lia une smja skte hai
Lekin ese kisi person ki life lena other life saves k lia usse n keval us healthy person k fundamental right ka violation but yeh ek bda crime ha iske lia punishment bi milegi sath hi medical personnel p public trust m.bi giravat aayegi
Corporate governance ko strong krne and accountability bnaye rhkne k lia transperancy lana chaia
😊❤❤
Aap mudit jain ke class se ho kya ethics ke
Study ias with dhrmendra jakar sir s PDI and Sumit sir s
@@agrawalpriya817 course buy kiya hain kya
Sir you tube p hi pda rhke hai and aapki choice ho to aap answer writing ka batch join kr skte ho
1. As per Kant - Right to means - Junior doctor is right
--> He focused on mean
2. As per utilitarian principle
Senior doctor is right
--> He focused on END means Overall ( long term ) benifits
जूनियर डॉक्टर द्वारा उठाया गया प्रश्न स्वाभाविक हैं,
किंतु किसी एक के सहयोग से यदि हम 5 अन्य लोगों की जान बचा सकते हैं तो इसमें बुरा कुछ भी नहीं,
हमें सुनिश्चित करना होगा कि हम उपर्युक्त व्यक्ति को परिस्थितियों से अवगद कराए व उसे संभावित चुनौतियों को बताए,
क्योंकि देह सम्बन्धी अंततः निर्णय उस व्यक्ति का ही होना चाहिए|(बिना किसी दबाववश)
Sir yha dilemma hai between individualism and socialism,
Mere ya opinion hai ki vyakti samaj ka member hota hua bhi apni vishesh pehchan rakhta hai or uska apna rights hota hai jo samaj ka liya sacrifice nhi kiya ja sakta isliya us health man ka organs nhi lene chahiye but agar koi aisi chij ho jo individual ko negative impact na kra or society ka hit ma ho to usa kiya ja sakta hai for example agar healthy person apni marji sa apni aak kidney dena chahye to aak vyakti ki life bach jayagi
यह दीप अकेला स्नेह भरा मदमाता,
पर इसे भी पंक्ति को समर्पित कर दो❤
अज्ञेय 😊
Mera opinion bhi yahi h
Hame sabse phle Healthy person ki will samjhna chahiye ki kya vaha un 5 unhealthy persons ko help krna chahta h organ donate krk ya nhi, agr vo chahta h to vo kr skta h, but agar use doctor force kre to vo crime hoga, or medical terms k according galat bhi,
Second aspect yeh hoga ki sabhi k individual rights h article 21 right to life and personal liberty and others
To hum esa decisions bna skte h jisme nuksaan kam or benefit jyada ho jese ki healthy person liver donate kre to use bhi nuksaan nhi h jyada or dusre bhi bach jaye
Third aspect according to utilitarian theory - vo 5 log bach jayenge to overall economy m benefit hoga unki skills and education k hisab se
Thank you sir 🙏🙏🙏
2:15 mere hisab se junior doctor sahi hai
Agar hume 5 logon ki life bachani hai to.uske.liye kisi ek ko jo healthy hai usko sacrifice.nahi kar sakte
Doctor kisi or hospital se sampark karke arrange kar sakte hai
Jaise kahi par accidental patient aaye ho, jo ki dead ho , ya koi or patient jiski life risk me ho
Uske bhi organ liye ja sakte hai,
Ya fir jinko organ chahiye unke koi relative jo apni marji se organ donate karna chahe puri guidelines ko follow karte huye.
Everyone's life is equally important so we cannot sacrifice any single person for the benefit of other 5 person.
Thank you sir for the case study question 😊😊😊😊😊
Sir ji hum pehle us vyakti se puchna chahenge ki kya wo apne organ dene ke liye agree hai , agree krne per senior dr. Ke sath anyatha kisi dusre healthy person ko dhundenge ....
Healthy Patient 🤡🙂
Junier Docter ka view sahi hai.
Ethics case dilema---- Sir, jaruri nhi ki healthy person ka sab organ needy patient me successfully function kare , so First try karenge ki Organ store bank se available karay , if its not possible then , Healthy person se unki concent leker aisa kr sakte hai jisse major life save ho sake
Senior doctor is right because agar 1 person se 5 person ki jaan bachai ja Sakti hai but junior doctor ka view jyada sahi hai kyu ki 1 person ke piche unki family bhi to hoti hai
Ho sakta hai wah person apne ghar ka akela kamane wala ho aur usase hi uska family chalata ho
Thank you so much sir❤
Mahatma gandhi's view-both ends and means justified the thing
Utilitarian approach(Jeremy Benthom)-great benefit to more no.of people(should be transplanted)
Kantian principle -there is not treat to other person as ameans to justified ends
Constitution-Art-21- Right to live with dignity Right to choose, .Right to health etc
And then According to me ,There should be transplanted because(Healthy person-Myself)
Priority to work for society so it should transplanted.
As per dentological approach there is no wrong way to do right thing so junior doctor rihgt in this situation
acc to utalitarian approach greater good is more important than individual so one person save the life of another 5 person
But in this situation individual chice mattter that he want to donate organs if he agree then i go with senior doctor
Rather than i go with junior doctor because individual right to life with dignity matter and also there is no guarantee one person donate his organ make all healthier or save
Sir dono doctor me se kisi ek ko sahi bolna sahi hoga healthy person ka organ lekar 5 persons ko beshaq life save Kiya ja sakta doner ka right to individual hai o de ya na de agar o organ de donate Kiya doner ka family musibat me aa sakte.
Sir yaha kisi ka right ya kisi ek ko wrong nahi kaha ja sakta
Thanks sir...
Sir junior doctor ke sath agar wo person organ donate nahin karna chahta to
sir editorial monthly please dal do hindi walo ke liye please sir ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
bahut badiya se explain kiya untouchability ko
Over all out put dekhna chahiye but kisi bhi person self dignity ya khud jeene ka aadhikar hai
Agar koi five persons family se jaise daughter ka husband, mother, father, sister ka husband, brother ke bacche aur vahi kamane wala ho home m iss situation m de dena m sahi manuga .
2nd situation
Country ko koi dangerous khatra hai jo five persons bade par उन logo ko koi replacement nhi ya उन ki jagah nhi sakta hai, only one person heathy hai that time toh uss person self puch kar ya uss ki family se consult kar ke agar vo agree 👍 hai toh aap le sakte hai ya uss ki family me 10 log ussi se life jee rhe means kamane wala vahi ho toh nhi Lena chahiye person ke bachho ka future spoile ho sakta hai
Iss place par dono docter sahi kahe rhe aapne aapne values , fundamental ke hisab se .
Uss person ki bhi koi galti nhi chayhe toh help kar bhi sakta hai nhi bhi
Thank you sir ji ❤
📌sir, as your statement not same organ for everyone,
Better solution is find elder as well as more ill person among them and contribute his/her organ another 3 person. Not involve healthy outsider peasent.
Why I choose elder? Youger can contribute more in GDP
" The whole situation is based on healthy person not on senior or junior doctor " Sir ye delima es parkar solve krenge ki jo healthy person ha us se sabse phele puche ge ki vo apne organ dene ko tyr ha kya kyunki uske upar 2 situation based 1- phele agr vo apne organ deta ha to 5 logo ki life bacti ha or uske family pr badley effect padega uske or agr vo family ki economics backbone ha to or jyda badley effect padega.....
2- situation agr vo apne organ deta ha to 5 logo ki life bachti ha or Pancho ke family bhi bhot khush hogi ...
bro the healthy person is came in hospital for heathcare not for organ donation😂😂😂 so there is no question here to ask that person to donate their organ .
Healthy person ha uski hi choice hogi na ... Uske sath koi jabrdasti thodi kr ha
Will go for other option,
It will violete individuals right to life and no one go against it,
Rahi baat dr.k samaj seva ki to unko last end tk kosis karna chahiye un patients ko bachane ki ,agr success nhi bhi hue to bhi ye rhega ki unse bna wo kiye .
Junior Dr. Key saath. Jinka kharab hai unka toh Kharab hi hai. But jo sahi hai unko kaise hum barbad kar saktey hai. Paitent agar khud se donate karna chahe toh alag baat hai uske liye hum unse ek baar request karke dekh saktey hai. Kyoun ki kidney wagera ka donation hota hai, but uske liye bhi bht sare procedures ko complete karna hoga. And doctors ka kaam hai without any emotion and influence apne service ko provide karna. And agar main Triage system ko bhi dekhu toh Dr. ka kaam hai jo paitents jaldi thik ho saktey hai unko thik karke discharge karna taki critical medical infrastructure par pressure kam pare.
Junior doctor ke saath, kant ka universality ka rule follow.
sir editorial monthly hindi walo ke liye jo dalti thi please restart sir humble request please sir
Sir as per case study- we have to ask first to that healthy person about donation of organ as the person have rights to life. And this is depend on person's discretion that he/she wanted to donate or not. Then only 5 person's life can be saved.
Sir here we apply Benthem concept of utilitarian that is greater happiness for greater number so support senior doctor
In prons- Hippocrates oath
In cons - utility theory
My opinion that I'm stand with junior doctors
Jan bach sakati hai
Jo jisko jarurat hai vo isko
Exchange kar sakte hai
Example healthy patient donet your heart but other ill patients jiska heart thik hai lekin uska kidney thik nahi hai to vo ek dusre ke sath cooperat kar sakte hai
i am with junior doctor
as dignity of life is paramount
and here the utilitarian approach of Mr. Bentham i.e. greatest happiness in greatest number is not correct as per my belief system
i believe in equality of dignity to everyone.
Junior doctor is right
Beacause human being is treated as end in itself and not means to save others life...
Senior doctors should use another method to save those patient and ask the help from their own relatives to donate the organ
Life of every human is equally important
Junior doctor is right.
Junior Dr is right because every individual should have bodily autonomy, and he/she alone has the right to decide in respect of events that affect his/her physical body.
Kisi ke jivan ko bachane ke liye , dusre ke jivan ki bali dena these values ke against h :-
1) justice ke principle ke against. [ 1 bhi nirdosh ko saja nhi honi chahiye ]
2) Right to dignity in life [ Art. : 21]
3)Gandhi ka sadhan - sadhy ki pavitrata
4) kant ki sarvbhomikta ke sidhant ke virudh
5) uss person ki freedom of will nhi rahegi , bcoz uski body ke bare me decision uska hi hona chahiye
6) J S mill ki utilatrial approach ( manshik sukh sresth h ) ke against
Hence junior Dr ki baat shi rahegi , hn agar vo vyakti self declaration se organ donate karta h to senior Dr ki baat mani jaa sakti h
Mahatma Buddha -Bahujan hitay bahujan shukhaya
Karl Marx - sadhya pavitra ho to sadhan apna aap pavitra ho jata hai
Junior doctor is right because -
1. Jivn ke adhikar ka ullnghn hoga(art-21)
2.gandhi(sadhn sadhy pvitrta),mil(priskrit sukhvad),kant(sarvbhomikta sutr) aadi sidhanto se glt hoga
3.phchan aadhar pr phle mnusyta or bad me klyan aata h is hisab se bhi wrong
4.krtvy ki naitikta se bhi yh glt hoga
5.isse visvsniyta ki kmi aayegi log doctor ke pass nhi jayenge
So, vykti ki bina anumti uske orgn nikalna = wrong
Doctor ko koi or rasta nikalna chahiye jaise kisi donet ki body se ilaj , ya bio technik ka use krna
Thank you so much sir🙂🙂
Sir I would like to Give my answer with one example from past
Chandragupta Maurya followed chanakya But still in end he adopted Jainism (peace)
By killing one we can sive five but in the end It will left remorse pain and regret and bad impact on humanity
Only focusing on physical health is not enough we have to think about mental health after killing one person for five person. It impact on society ,her/her parents relatives we are indirectly killing more than we saved So do good have good this my personal opinion
जो एक हेल्थी व्यक्ति आया है क्या पता है अच्छा व्यक्ति हो और जो 5लोग को अंग की आवश्यकता है क्या पता उनमें से कोई मतलब उतना अच्छा व्यक्ति नहीं हो या उसने कोई क्राइम किया हो तो किसी एक हेल्थी मनुष्य के अंग को निकालकर 5 जिंदगी को बचाने के बाद भी उसे प्रकार की समाज सेवा नहीं मिलेगी क्योंकि हमने एक अच्छे व्यक्तियों को मार कर 5 में से कम से कम दो व्यक्ति ऐसे को बचाया है जो आगे चलकर क्राइम करेंगे और अच्छी जिंदगी है बर्बाद कर सकते हैं ऐसा भी हो सकता है
Ye kaisa answe diya 😮😅
@yatendrarajput3347 mujhe हिंदी पढ़ना नही आता yaar क्या करूं
Sir I am with the junior doctor because this is his life and his body that he own and that is given by the god and the nature to him. So If five persons can be saved by organ transplantation of healthy person that is not the justice to the god and the nature.
144 days completed
Consistently ❤❤❤
Kafi jbrdast sir...
junior because as per Gandhi end and means should be tested separately for consistency of moral principles
Sir both doctors are right but junior doctor's argument theek hai aur doctors ko ek bar healthy person se organ donation k liye baat krni chahiye and other persons se bhi contact krena chahiye
Junior doctor, because right to choice
Junior doctor. Ethical doesn't mean kill someone without his/her consent for larger betterment of society. Because it will lead to chaos in the society. And individuals right will be end .but our constitution giving preferences individuals .(art21)
The decision should be made based on who is most beneficial to society (a social asset)
1st to ask healthy person to donate their organs or not.because every person have right to live (art21).2nd connect with other hospitals for organs to save patients .senior doctor opinion harm to society , affect medical ethics, work against fundamental rights . junior doctor opinion follow hospital rule and regulations, respect fundamental rights.To save 5 patients live denger other unknown person live it's not right.other unknown person may be son, brother , husbend, father of a family who provide economic support to the family.
I will support junior doctor.
thank you so much for your efforts on daily basis . tbh i get motivated from you as ur daily consistent with editorial discussion. it really means a lot to me sir.
Sir wo Beijing aur Delhi ka pollution ka article reh gya pllzz cover krwa dejeyga
This is a classic ethical dilemma that involves the principles of utilitarianism by senior doctor versus individual rights by the junior one. Sir in this situation the informed consent which is a basis of medical ethics should be upheld. Organ donation should be voluntary. Ultimately, no action can be deemed entirely right or wrong, but it is crucial to find a solution that respects both individual rights and the value of human life. A more thoughtful approach might be to explore all other alternatives, including waiting for organ donations from deceased individuals, to avoid taking such a drastic step.
Stakeholders-
Senior doctor, junior doctors, healthy person and his family, 5 patients and their families, society.
Issue
Ek person ke organ 5 logo me kese lag sakte hai.
Bahut saare issue ho sakte hai.jaise patient ka blood group match na kare ya patient ki body organ ko accept na kare.
Healthy person ke 2.fundamental rights ka violation. Art. 21
3.Individual interest vs community interest.
Work ethics
Hippocratic oath
Option 1 senior doctor decision
+ve
Upyogitavad
-ve
Violation of constitution, natural justice,
Decision- this decision is wrong. Junior doctors should oppose this decision.
2nd option :- find other options like contact with other hospitals.
Ese vyakti ke organ lene chahiye kiska brain dead ho ya vah kai saalo se coma me ho ya keval machine ke share jinda ho. Unki family se consent lekar in 5 patients ki jan bacha sakte hai
Healthy person ko saari situation batayege phir agar wo agree rha to , wo bhi agar wo 5th organ nhi balki jitne wo chahe , ya jitne organ donate karne ke baad bhi wo Healthy rhe , utne hi ...,other hand hm kisi another Healthy person ya organ ka management krenge
I support junior doctor because he thinks first as human being and as a ethical perspective that creates positive impact in the society
Sir hum apne personal life ke examples ko answer writing me kis prakar se likh skte hai?? Kya hum usme apna naam mension kar skte hai?
Namaskar Sir 🎉
Here are the key points from the video "13 December 2024 | Editorial Discussion | Pakistan in Security Council, Untouchability, ULB":
* Ethical Dilemma: A doctor faces a dilemma of saving five lives by harvesting organs from a healthy individual or respecting the individual's right to life.
* Untouchability: The video discusses the origins and nature of untouchability, challenging the racial and occupational theories. It also explores Ambedkar's views on untouchability and his ideal society.
* Pakistan in Security Council: The video analyzes Pakistan's potential role as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council, focusing on its likely actions and India's counterstrategies.
* Urban Local Body Elections: The video discusses the importance of timely elections for urban local bodies and the challenges in conducting them, such as delimitation and reservation issues. It also highlights the need for an independent body to address these issues.
(1) junior doctor is write because every person has write to Life and his main behaviour is individualism but (2) Doctor is also write because hi wants to benefit majority 🙏🙏🙏🤞🤞🤞
Sir this is the case of informed consent.
If the person agrees to donate the organs , then it can be done . But if the person disagrees then if we have to agree with him .
junior dr, bcz vo apne routine checkup ko aaya hai to do it ,dusri baat kya vo khud consent de raha ki yes i want to donate then it will good to transplant the organs but agar uske bina jaane dr. kar raha to ye violation hai uske rights ka , so it's all depend healthy person khud se donate karna chah raha yaa aap dr. uske bina jaane uske body ko use kar rhe .
people should not use as means to an end
This is a tough situation, but I agree with the junior doctor. Every person has the right to live their life with dignity, as guaranteed by Article 21. Taking the life of an innocent person, just to save five others, is wrong. That person hasn’t done anything to deserve such a punishment.
However, if the person is someone who has committed horrible crimes like murder or rape, then I might agree with the senior doctor because such a person has already harmed society. Still, doctors should try every other possible way to save the five patients, like finding emergency donors or using advanced medical techniques. Taking an innocent life shouldn’t be an option.
go with junior doctor individual have no fault even if take organ from them and transplant to other doing that
1)we voilate their fundamental right,
2) not neccesary that those health persons organ set in their patient's body chances of failure also from doing that we lose both healthy person and patient also
3) also complaint to the hospital authority about senior doctor of these type of behavior
from doing that we follow our tradition that "100 gunegar chhut jaye par 1 nirdosh ko saja nahi honi chahiye"
and for patient i tried and firnd the donor of oragn and not aafect any other healthy person
Junior doctor ke sath pr ydi wo ya koi aor healthy person apne ang deta hai apni ikchha se to siniar doctor ke sath
Sir next day dilemma par aape views bhi btaya kro
Sir sbse pahle hm un persons ke liye koi other hospitals me organ ki dhunne Ka pryas krege
सर पहले उस हेल्दी पर्सन से बात करके उसको पेसेंट्स की कंडीशन बताएंगे फ़िर उससे कुछ पार्ट डोनेट करने को बोलेंगे जिसमें उसका भी ज़्यादा नुकसान न हो
जैसे: लीवर, ब्लूड या कुछ और भी कंडिशन में जैसा दिया हो
बाकी अन्यों के लिए और कुछ उपाय देखेंगे जैसे कोई ngo etc
Whatever junior doctor mentioned, it is right. If agreed with senior doctor,it denies healthy person individual right.
Junior doctors k sath bcoz constitution provides right to lifr eith dignity if the person dont want to donate then we can't firce for donating ....if the person wants then we should approach the senior doctor and utilitarian principle
Good afternoon sir 🙏
अनटचेबिलिटी पर जो राइटर ने फैक्ट दिए हैं वह गलत है।। अंबेडकर की बुक में अनटचेबल को क्षत्रिय बताया है जिसका प्रमाण उन्होंने देते हुए शांतिवन पर्व में उल्लेखित शूद्र राजा पेजवन का उदाहरणदिया है।। अनटचेबिलिटी का कारण उक्त वर्ग के सामाजिक बहिष्कार कापरिणाम था।।
Gud afternoon sir thanks a lot
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🙏
Sir I think this is means vs end
Jisme means kuch bhi ho end achieve ho jaega 5 life save krne ka
I m with junior doctor as in this case senior didn't said abt taking permission from healthy patient to donate but to do it by himself which is against morality and doctor ethics as well as against right of individual to know .
Thankyou
During Varna system
Cow also eat?
Junior doctor view is right as he is healthy person and another person don't have the right to get his organ without his consent
As well as the patient who we receive organ they have to go immunosuppressive drug throughout their life without they will not sustain their live it also increase their expense and pain in their entire lifetime without giving much contribution to society either economic ,terms or social term( humanity)
Sir mai capf ac ke liye prepare kar raha hu aapki new initiative current affairs ki paid classse capf ka current affairs kavar ho jayega
Very simple answer bro jo five patients hain onke different different organs damage hain wase bi marne wale hain onko convince kro akele aadmi ko convince karne se easy bi ha koi ek convince ho gya toh oske organs baki char logu mein dal do aur jo oska organ kharab tha wo toh pahle hi aap ne bola different organ kharab hain sab mein🎉
First we will consult with that healthy individual if he wants to donate his organs for the sake of other patients life,,also it is unethical to just save other patients at the stake of one individuals personal life,as everyone have right to life , majorly it would be that man's decision or we can ask him to help others by donating specific organs with the condition his life won't be threatened.
I agree though of junior doctor
नहीं sir यह doctor का ethics nahi he ki wo kisi ki life ko compare kare or jis tarh se bhartiya nyay व्यव्स्था ka yah ethics he ki 100 अपराधी सजा से बच जाए तो कोई बात नहीं पर किसी निर्दोष को सजा नहीं मिलनी चाहिए वैसे ही doctor का होता है
Me junior ke sath hu
Because everyone has right to live , yet we can ask one time that healthy patient
Good afternoon sir
Sir senior doctor has utilitarian perspective that is greatest good for greatest no. Of people but junior doctor has invidualistic perspective.
Acc. To me healthy person should be asked if he wants to donate and save 5 person or not . Otherwise it is against art. 21 right to life and against natural law which protects right to life and liberty.
What is vitoo ?
Can anyone please understand me
I support junior doctor becoz mean should be positive and follow Gandhian principle kyki ek ki jaan lekar 4 jaan bachana pricipali tab shi nhi h jab wo poori tarah se healthy.
There was a dilemma before gandhi during NCM, if he continues the movement we might have achieved freedom decades before the actual time/date, but gandhi chose means that strictly follow the Ahimsa(means) over independence, as if the end is achieved through the immoral means it becomes the faith of that society and they react accordingly. In this case if the senior doctors are using one human as means without his/her consent it is against his human/fundamental right that is right to lifewith dignity but if the person wants to donate his/her organ with his conscience it is moral and justifiable. ULTIMATELY if it against his/her consent with conscience it should not no be done, it is against the ethics of duty of the doctors, because doctors are life saviour.
Love you Sir 😘
Firstly doctor must ask to healthy because it is right to dignity and to life of the individual without his consent it is illegal and against his fundamental rights . There are many way to save the life 5 people
Sir in my opinion junior doctor is right
Because there is violation of right to life and no one have right to take life of others so there may be many solutions like exchanging of organs between ill persons and other solutions may be who have requirement of those oragns which are in bi numbers by single orngans a person may live like kidney it can be done
I think healthy person view on a organ transplant is take as a first preference and then other view take as a senior doctor and junior doctor
Junior doctor is right because any person first priority personl life after social life
First to ask that healthy person whether he is ready or not because may be it's possible if he can allow for any one organ without his consent taking out all organs can be misleading and crime ; searching for other other alternatives through technology used by other countries; arrangement of some persons who are in great need of money but though he/she may not allow for all organs ....this is my view
With Junior doctor
I m with junior Dr.
🙏
Junior doctor because doctor guarantee is to make unhealthy to healthy.but not make healthy into unhealthy. Alternatively only one people can be saved through organ donation if such person agreed to do it .
I am with junior doctor, because individual right has more priority than utilitarian approch .
Junior doctor is correct but first ask the person if he agree to give his organs it is his choice
Sir junior dr ke sath coz us jagah mai khud ko sochu to v aise ka virodh kruga , aur sir organ dene ke baad v marij mar skta hai, aur sir yah constitutional ethics, ke khilaf hai.....aur sir agar Bach v jaye to eske liye us person ka consent lena jaruri....etc ke conclusion se junior ke sath🙏
Junior director 👍
Senior doctor jaise bhi log hain is duniya me 😂