Zarathustra, or Zoroaster, The First Monotheist? (1500-1000 BC)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 37

  • @raselhasan430
    @raselhasan430 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great and fantastic work buddy. Carry on . Very informative TH-cam channel

  • @korakys
    @korakys 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    You could tell a pretty interesting slice of history by following this strain of monotheisim: from Iranian Zoroastrians, to Canaanite Jews, to Byzantine Christians, to Roman Catholics, to German Lutherans, maybe stop by Dutch Calvanists, to English Anglicans, to America's melange of Christianities. Probably could slot Arab's Muslims between Byzantium and Rome.

    • @divinelyautistic
      @divinelyautistic 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      It's quite plausible. I like how u stated that the jews were Canaanite themselves.. Once they came under Persian influence and rule, they were influenced by Zoroastrianism, which would include monotheism.. Later they then went to write the Tanakh and using Yahweh as the only god they were supposed to worship and that ALL humanity is in sin because of the worship of other gods. Once they established the 2nd Temple, that's when most of the old testament was written and from the southern tribe of jew's perspective. This 2nd Temple gave birth to Judaism, Christianity and Islam. But little do they know, that their origins goes back to 2nd Temple Judaism, then it splits to Persian influence, that goes all the way to The Proto indo European polytheism. While the other path was influenced through Mesopotamian and Canaanitish polytheism. I'm not a scholar and I don't claim to know it all, I may even be wrong about some of this, BUT there is nothing new under the sun

  • @srebalanandasivam9563
    @srebalanandasivam9563 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Can you acknowledge that Zarathustra was Indo Vedic in origin and he was born in Northern Kashmir and marched down to Balkh Afghanistan and then into Iran.

  • @ombotaklicinz0024
    @ombotaklicinz0024 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    16:55 Crossing this narrow bridge and underneath there is hell, there is a similar teaching in Islam, is called "shiratal mustaqim" This happened because the majority of hadith writers were from Persia.

  • @darthvader098
    @darthvader098 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Zoroastrianism is actually henotheistic, not monotheistic. First monotheist was Akhenaten.

    • @edinshealtiel3754
      @edinshealtiel3754 13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Akhenaten ism
      Was Henotheistic ....
      The 1st Mono was islam ....😊😊😊

  • @eva4adam451
    @eva4adam451 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great fantastic lectureAlso sprach Zarathustra: Richard Strauss.
    Sarastro: in
    Mozart's Magic flute.

  • @markschoi
    @markschoi 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At Plato’s funeral it is recorded that Zoroaster was 6,000 years before Plato. That means Zoroaster is 8,500 years ago. Can you comment on this?

  • @isamkamel
    @isamkamel 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What is the oldest reliable and academically accepted document of Zarathustra you use as a reference?

    • @Stephans_History_of_the_World
      @Stephans_History_of_the_World  26 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      I would have to look that up. I think it was transmitted orally for a long time, as was the case in many other religions. The text could have changed in the meantime, but the fact that the Gathas are still in the archaic Avestan language and in contradiction with later texts is a good sign.

  • @gotz2410
    @gotz2410 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Claiming Zarathustra as the first monotheist doesn't make any sense, Akhenaten was monotheist in the 14th century BC

    • @Stephans_History_of_the_World
      @Stephans_History_of_the_World  27 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      Good point! I have to admit in hindsight it was too "clickbaity" of a title. I will put in a question mark. Although, 15th century is possible for Zarathustra, by comparing the language to that of the equally old Rig Vedas. If I make another version at some point, I will add Akhnaten.

  • @Arain221
    @Arain221 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Theres so much similarities between Hinduism and zorazstrianism
    Asura means bad beings
    While devas means good beings
    In Sanskrit
    But in avestan
    Ahura is good
    Devas is bad
    A h u r a the h in here is replaced by s in Sanskrit
    Like sindhu became hindu
    And soma become homa for Persians .
    Ahura = demon Mazda= intelligent
    In Sanskrit
    Theres some fight have happened between the two
    Also hindus do wear thread around body like zorazstrians
    Infact yazidi religion is interestingly very similar to Hinduism
    Even the temple structure
    Peacock god
    Many rituals and traditions is very similar to ours

    • @DudewithaGoodMood
      @DudewithaGoodMood 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      No, in the oldest texts of Hinduism Asura is not a bad being but mighty beings.

    • @Arain221
      @Arain221 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @DudewithaGoodMood its not even bad in any scriptures it's seen as negative beings

    • @DudewithaGoodMood
      @DudewithaGoodMood 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Arain221 I'm talking about in Rigveda

    • @Arain221
      @Arain221 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@DudewithaGoodMood even in rig Veda it's not bad
      Or any other it's seen have negative slightly even devas were baad like indra in bhagwat puran.

    • @DudewithaGoodMood
      @DudewithaGoodMood 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Arain221 No. You have not read the Vedas only Puranas that's why you're saying that. Vedic terms are different from Puranic terms.

  • @CGMaat
    @CGMaat 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    The star gazers climb so high on their ziggurats that they found the this god of the rounds of the celestial eternal fixed reason - the ONE -bringing the simple message ; think good say good do good . I call him the bicycle healer doctor making his round everyday - a day of light - dar a luz .

  • @Armyjay
    @Armyjay 17 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    I thought the Aten cult Akhenaten founded was the first mono theistic cult/religion (same thing).

  • @TravisTellsTruths
    @TravisTellsTruths 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I'm only 2 minutes in, but you are kicking a$$

  • @heinzgassner1057
    @heinzgassner1057 8 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    The problem with such intellectual analysis of old spiritual sources comes from the ‚paradigms‘ of those doing such analysis. This reminds me on studying climbing at a climbing university, reading all these different and contradicting books, trying to understand the stories about ropes and knots, discussing all this based on ill-defined words. What all the students and teachers of our climbing university never did: Stop talking and go to the overhanging cliff, exposing your’self’ existentially to climbing. As soon as this is happening, the climbers of all the different climbing universities silently agree and ‘understand’. You are doing interesting work, but I don’t think that conclusions like this or that was ‘dualistic’ has any deeper-going basis. After more than 40 years of running after so many teachings and teachers, for me it is now time to become more silent and start ‘climbing’.

  • @nafisehebadi4471
    @nafisehebadi4471 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Where is Iron? This is Iran ( Eiraan)

  • @isamkamel
    @isamkamel 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The oldest known document about Zarathustra is from the 8/9th. Century

    • @Stephans_History_of_the_World
      @Stephans_History_of_the_World  26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I do remember reading something like that, yes

    • @Stephans_History_of_the_World
      @Stephans_History_of_the_World  26 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      In the end all history is somewhat dodgy. Even the well-documented Greek history. We can't even make sense of our own time, haha

    • @TravisTellsTruths
      @TravisTellsTruths 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@Stephans_History_of_the_World Zarathustra is LEGITIMATE AF