EDIT: yeahh uhh i put the parentheses in the wrong place in the title when i first upload, my bad sorry, this song is not called "The People Will Not Forget Chinese" 😅 Yes, I know DAMN well I'm gonna get called a Hanjian like 30 times in the comments of this, but with all due respect, if you have a problem with this, click off. My Red Songs playlist has 66 videos in it. My Anticommunist Songs playlist has 9. Come on.
You are missing one thing tho. Those “students” were funded and trained by the CIA. This is confirmed by declassified documents. Also worth noting that after they refused to accept anything less then the complete dissolution of the CPC they at that point were class enemy’s, counter-revolutionary, and reactionary. They did not want reform or change, they wanted the complete destruction of socialism within the PRC and replace it with western liberal “democracy” They at that point were no different then the fascist KMT, Russian White army, or German SA.
I'm just gonna say it call me what you like I don't like what happened on that day I see it as wrong call me Hanjian call me stupid I see what happened that day as wrong
It could have been handled better without a doubt, but it’s worth mentioning the fact that the CPC order the protests to disband and vacate the area. Which most did. The only ones that remained were ones that had no interest in reform or negotiations? And who, from the start, were actively trying to force the CPC and PLA into a violent response. They received funding, and training by the CIA with the express purpose of destabilizing the PRC. Does that justify it? That’s up to personal opinion. As a Marxist Leninist myself I believe that while it could have been handled better, at the point at which the PLA is given the go ahead to open fire, all other options have been exhausted, the CPC tried negotiating, which most of the protesters where very open too, reaching many agreement, then after the CIA funded group began attacking and killing unarmed soldiers the protests where ordered to be disbanded, at which a majority of protesters obliged and left. At which point the only ones left where the ones who were actively seeking and would not settle for anything less the the complete destruction of the CPC and socialism in China. Personally I believe at that point they were counter-revolutionary’s and there for justified.
this hits particularly hard because here in Mexico we had a tragedy similar to the one of tiananmen long ago, every authoritarian government is equally afraid of the people. great song
Only 4 out of over 100 countries in Asia, Africa, and the Americas have entered developed economies in the past 40 years, and none of them were Western style democracies during their rise. The Han River miracle that created the rise of South Korea was led by authoritarian warlord Park Chung hee, the political powerhouse Lee Kuan yew who helped Singapore soar in Asia, Chiang Ching kuo who helped Taiwan's economy soar, and Hong Kong was governed by British inspectors who relied on China's import and export trade to soar. Why is it easy for a strong person to govern a country and make it rise? Companies in latecomer countries lack funds, technology, and complete competition to win over multinational corporations. Political elites extract funds from the bottom through strong national power to invest in industrialization. Large chaebols such as Samsung and LG in South Korea were supported by Park Chung hee, and the government provides low-interest loans to help key enterprises develop. Park Chung hee even used a gun to force chaebols to invest in South Korea's future pillar industries. The top ten construction projects in Taiwan, as well as semiconductor industries such as TSMC, were established during the Chiang Ching kuo era. If we fall into endless wrangling in a democratic government. In 1952, India's per capita GDP was higher than China's, and now China's per capita GDP is 5-6 times that of India.
Not sure about you but I value economic growth and for the safety of the nation and protected cultural values (looking at you ROC under DPP) and a socially conservative society with a mixed economy leaning more towards capitalism with some government protectionism then the if you ask me bullsh** of Social progressivism which threatens the stability of the nation which then threatens foreign investment. But I don't know it's just me. A typical Lee Kuan Yew fan (a benevolent dictatorship)
@@Blicero88 Justify what had happened or not. I personally see it as a necessary evil. This comes down. Social progressivism and major economic rush which could have caused what happened later to Russia when it got independence which if happened to China would have been much worse then what had happened to the Russian federation with Boris Yeltsin in power (I don't excuse Putin for anything so this is not a pro Putin statement) Or Increasing the economy gradually and slowly making sure all sectors can take time and modernise instead of rushing which would obviously cause many problems. Mao is a great example of rushing to modernise china since he started a famine. And keep in the socially conservative cultural thinking. Something if the protestors had their way mainland China would just be like how the ROC is under the DPP with all this woke acceptance liberal bs. This really comes under which you'd prefer. I'm a typical socially conservative person from South East Asia of Chinese decent with a centre right capitalist economic thinking. I'll go with the later so what happened at tiananmen was a necessary evil. To quote Lee Kuan Yew as a supporter of him and his ideology of Asian Values, "He took over and he said 'if I have to shoot 200,000 people to save China from another 100 years of disorder, so be it'"
Unfortunately, I couldn't find this song on the ist of Tiananmen songs on Chinese Wikipedia, and there are few videos on it on yt anyways. I've decided what my next obession for the next few days is gonna be, thanks for introducing this absolute banger!
Only 4 out of over 100 countries in Asia, Africa, and the Americas have entered developed economies in the past 40 years, and none of them were Western style democracies during their rise. The Han River miracle that created the rise of South Korea was led by authoritarian warlord Park Chung hee, the political powerhouse Lee Kuan yew who helped Singapore soar in Asia, Chiang Ching kuo who helped Taiwan's economy soar, and Hong Kong was governed by British inspectors who relied on China's import and export trade to soar. Why is it easy for a strong person to govern a country and make it rise? Companies in latecomer countries lack funds, technology, and complete competition to win over multinational corporations. Political elites extract funds from the bottom through strong national power to invest in industrialization. Large chaebols such as Samsung and LG in South Korea were supported by Park Chung hee, and the government provides low-interest loans to help key enterprises develop. Park Chung hee even used a gun to force chaebols to invest in South Korea's future pillar industries. The top ten construction projects in Taiwan, as well as semiconductor industries such as TSMC, were established during the Chiang Ching kuo era. If we fall into endless wrangling in a democratic government. In 1952, India's per capita GDP was higher than China's, and now China's per capita GDP is 5-6 times that of India.
Bro has posted so many pro-communism songs, but no one calls him commie. Yet once he posts a song that criticises the Chinese government, some people will call him betrayer. 😂
Shame on the Deng revisionist clique which massacred these good and decent students and abandoned all revolutionary ideals. We shall not forget our fallen comrades!
Tiananmen Square Protests (Also known as the June Fourth Incident) In Western media, the well-known story of the "Tiananmen Square Massacre" goes like this: the Chinese government declared martial law in 1989 and mobilized the military to suppress students who were protesting for democracy and freedom. According to western sources, on June 4th of that year, troops and tanks entered Tiananmen Square and fired on unarmed protesters, killing and injuring hundreds, if not thousands, of people. The more hyperbolic tellings of this story include claims of tanks running over students, machine guns being fired into the crowd, blood running in the streets like a river, etc. Anti-Communists and Sinophobes commonly point to this incident as a classic example of authoritarianism and political repression under Communist regimes. The problem, of course, is that the actual events in Beijing on June 4th, 1989 unfolded quite differently than how they were depicted in the Western media at the time. Despite many more contemporary articles coming out that actually contradict some of the original claims and characterizations of the June Fourth Incident, the narrative of a "Tiananmen Square Massacre" persists. Background After Mao's death in 1976, a power struggle ensued and the Gang of Four were purged, paving the way for Deng Xiaoping's rise to power. Deng initiated economic reforms known as the "Four Modernizations," which aimed to modernize and open up China's economy to the world. These reforms led to significant economic growth and lifted millions of people out of poverty, but they also created significant inequality, corruption, and social unrest. This pivotal point in the PRC's history is extremely controversial among Marxists today and a subject of much debate. One of the key factors that contributed to the Tiananmen Square protests was the sense of social and economic inequality that many Chinese people felt as a result of Deng's economic reforms. Many believed that the benefits of the country's economic growth were not being distributed fairly, and that the government was not doing enough to address poverty, corruption, and other social issues. Some saw the Four Modernizations as a betrayal of Maoist principles and a capitulation to Western capitalist interests. Others saw the reforms as essential for China's economic development and modernization. Others still wanted even more liberalization and thought the reforms didn't go far enough. The protestors in Tiananmen were mostly students who did not represent the great mass of Chinese citizens, but instead represented a layer of the intelligentsia who wanted to be elevated and given more privileges such as more political power and higher wages. Counterpoints Jay Mathews, the first Beijing bureau chief for The Washington Post in 1979 and who returned in 1989 to help cover the Tiananmen demonstrations, wrote: Over the last decade, many American reporters and editors have accepted a mythical version of that warm, bloody night. They repeated it often before and during Clinton’s trip. On the day the president arrived in Beijing, a Baltimore Sun headline (June 27, page 1A) referred to “Tiananmen, where Chinese students died.” A USA Today article (June 26, page 7A) called Tiananmen the place “where pro-democracy demonstrators were gunned down.” The Wall Street Journal (June 26, page A10) described “the Tiananmen Square massacre” where armed troops ordered to clear demonstrators from the square killed “hundreds or more.” The New York Post (June 25, page 22) said the square was “the site of the student slaughter.” The problem is this: as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square. - Jay Matthews. (1998). The Myth of Tiananmen and the Price of a Passive Press. Columbia Journalism Review. Reporters from the BBC, CBS News, and the New York Times who were in Beijing on June 4, 1989, all agree there was no massacre. Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside the square: Cables, obtained by WikiLeaks and released exclusively by The Daily Telegraph, partly confirm the Chinese government's account of the early hours of June 4, 1989, which has always insisted that soldiers did not massacre demonstrators inside Tiananmen Square - Malcolm Moore. (2011). Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim Gregory Clark, a former Australian diplomat, and Chinese-speaking correspondent of the International Business Times, wrote: The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing’s iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time - among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night. Yet none of this has stopped the massacre from being revived constantly, and believed. All that has happened is that the location has been changed - from the Square itself to the streets leading to the Square. - Gregory Clark. (2014). Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies Thomas Hon Wing Polin, writing for CounterPunch, wrote: The most reliable estimate, from many sources, was that the tragedy took 200-300 lives. Few were students, many were rebellious workers, plus thugs with lethal weapons and hapless bystanders. Some calculations have up to half the dead being PLA soldiers trapped in their armored personnel carriers, buses and tanks as the vehicles were torched. Others were killed and brutally mutilated by protesters with various implements. No one died in Tiananmen Square; most deaths occurred on nearby Chang’an Avenue, many up to a kilometer or more away from the square. More than once, government negotiators almost reached a truce with students in the square, only to be sabotaged by radical youth leaders seemingly bent on bloodshed. And the demands of the protesters focused on corruption, not democracy. All these facts were known to the US and other governments shortly after the crackdown. Few if any were reported by Western mainstream media, even today. - Thomas Hon Wing Palin. (2017). Tiananmen: the Empire’s Big Lie (Emphasis mine) And it was, indeed, bloodshed that the student leaders wanted. In this interview, you can hear one of the student leaders, Chai Ling, ghoulishly explaining how she tried to bait the Chinese government into actually committing a massacre. (She herself made sure to stay out of the square.): Excerpts of interviews with Tiananmen Square protest leaders This Twitter thread contains many pictures and videos showing protestors killing soldiers, commandeering military vehicles, torching military transports, etc. Following the crackdown, through Operation Yellowbird, many of the student leaders escaped to the United States with the help of the CIA, where they almost all gained privileged positions. Additional Resources Video Essays: Truth about The Tiananmen Square Protests | Tovarishch Endymion (2019) Tiananmen Square "Massacre", A Propaganda Hoax | TeleSUR English (2019) All The Questions Socialists Are Asked, Answered (TIMESTAMPED) | Hakim (2021) Books, Articles, or Essays: Tiananmen Protests Reading List | Qiao Collective How psy-ops warriors fooled me about Tiananmen Square: a warning | Nury Vittachi, Friday (2022) 1989: Tiananmen Square ‘massacre’ was a myth | Deirdre Griswold, Workers World (2022) Massacre? What Massacre? 25 Years Later: What really happened at Tiananmen Square? | Kim Petersen, Dissident Voice (2014) Tiananmen: The Massacre that Wasn’t | Brian Becker, Liberation News (2019) Reflections on Tiananmen Square and the attempt to end Chinese socialism | Mick Kelly, FightBack! News (2019) The Tian’anmen Square “Massacre” The West’s Most Persuasive, Most Pervasive Lie. | Tom, Mango Press (2021)
Very true, I just thought that was the best name to use. Frankly I don’t think this even in violation of the Communist philosophy. 《世界是你们的，也是我们的，但是归根结底是你们的。你们青年人朝气蓬勃，正在兴旺时期，好象早晨八、九点钟的太阳。希望寄托在你们身上。》
Today is the 35th anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. Let us remember the courageous university students who fought for democracy, freedom of spech, and liberty. Let us support our friend's struggle fighting in Hong Kong.
Hope that someday as China become more wealthy and stable, China and the Chinese people will be ready for democracy. And that democracy should be its own form, a little bit similar to that if the west, and one’s that still good enough to keep the nation United.
Unfortunately, money corrupts. Many mistake democracy as some institution; worse off, there are some who even see it as some sort of ideal. No, democracy is not some madame in fur, nor some damsel in distress, but a Valkyrie of revolution. Democracy is people's power, and the people should wield it on the streets, against their enemies.
@@熊唯嘉 Democracy is not just an ideal for a revolution, though in the past to transition from a traditional feudal outdated society to a new modern one, a revolution is needed to install one. To me a democracy is basically an idea of giving powers to the people, to allow them to decide on how their nation should be run by electing politicians who will represent them & that the politicians should do what’s best for all people and the nation as a whole. However it’s a power that the people should know how to use it in the right way to elect better and competent leaders, who will actually bring good changes to the nation and protect the nation from foreign threats, not a leader who will always lie to the citizens as a way to be elected, and later on in power failed to meet the goal that they promise to the people and always accept bribe for their own personal need.
@@codyshi4743 Democracy is not about "giving" powers to the people; it's about we the people seizing power for ourselves. It's not about finding some good masters to rule us with benevolence, but about forcing our masters to bend to our will, eventually overthrowing them. In this sense, democracy is still vibrant in the United States, not because people get to vote, but because people get to go on streets and participate in political empowerment; in this sense, democracy is inherently anti-government, and its natural conclusion is anarchy.
@@熊唯嘉 If you say we the people seizing power ourselves, but in the end, we the people would still need someone to be put into power, so they are the ones who will be doing our work and works that would benefit us the people who put them there. There can never be a true democracy like that of ancient Greece, in this modern world, because there always gonna needs to be one or a group of people being put in charge to ensure peace, stability, progress, and order in the society and the nation as a whole, but we can hope that those who are put in charge would do the work to ensure that the government is doing what would be beneficial to the majority of the people that would benefit in the present and the long run. I kind of agree and disagree about what you said about the US still being vibrant in democracy. Because like yeah we do have the right to go out and protest to demand change, but however, some people took this protest too way far and abused their rights, which led to many riots and destruction being taken place in some parts of the nation, which in turn created no safety and stability for business owners and the common citizens. Having the right to protest and express your political opinion is really important, but however, "with many rights also comes many responsibilities" and that is to know how to use them in the right way instead of using them in the wrong way, which in turn would harm the freedom of other individuals.
Sun Yat Sen(Founding father of modern China & Forerunner of the democratic revolution) once said: "An individual should not have too much freedom. A nation should have absolution freedom."
"They marched on Beijing, just like in 1989." "The government was bad." "Who cares, thats what they did!" "They resisted the Japanese they did! They were brave anti-colonialist warriors! And in this house, the May Fourth movement students were heroes, end of story!"
But at the same time, the June 4th movement is always being talked more often out in the west and little does the west pay any attention to the May 4th movement.
It's so obvious that it was an attempt at colour revolution, backed by foreign assets. Only the truly brainwashed think it was some sort of democratic little nice movement.
@@TheBigWall3284Yeah, I believe the workers should own and manage their means of production Which China doesn’t do lol Being Socialist doesn’t mean your support the red team, it’s an ideology
万岁 to the brave PLA soldiers who sacrificed themselves on this day to prevent CIA-backed Color Revolution, thereby ensuring the future prosperity and stability of the PRC state for decades to come.
“Order prevails in Warsaw!” “Order prevails in Paris!” “Order prevails in Berlin!” Every half-century that is what the bulletins from the guardians of “order” proclaim from one center of the world-historic struggle to the next. And the jubilant “victors” fail to notice that any “order” that needs to be regularly maintained through bloody slaughter heads inexorably toward its historic destiny; its own demise.
It's more like in the middle. Because I really doubt the June 1 report that hardliners like Li Peng merely crafted to convince Deng to follow them instead of the moderates. Not every uprising is a CIA plot, sometimes the people are just really pissed off at the leaders.
@@koikat3708 We may be asked, do we not find a tear, a sigh, a word for the victims of the people's wrath, for the National Guard, the mobile guard, the republican guard and the line? The state will care for their widows and orphans, decrees extolling them will be issued, their remains will be carried to the grave in solemn procession, the official press will declare them immortal, the European reaction in the East and the West will pay homage to them. But the plebeians are tormented by hunger, abused by the press, forsaken by the physicians, called thieves, incendiaries and galley-slaves by the respectabilities; their wives and children are plunged into still greater misery and the best of those who have survived are sent overseas. It is the right and the privilege of the democratic press to place laurels on their gloomy threatening brow. --Karl Marx, “The June Revolution” (1848)
EDIT: yeahh uhh i put the parentheses in the wrong place in the title when i first upload, my bad sorry, this song is not called "The People Will Not Forget Chinese" 😅
Yes, I know DAMN well I'm gonna get called a Hanjian like 30 times in the comments of this, but with all due respect, if you have a problem with this, click off. My Red Songs playlist has 66 videos in it. My Anticommunist Songs playlist has 9. Come on.
it's ok
You are not a hanjian, plus this song slaps
@@Tian2zi4huang2di4 ive cried to this to be honest, though not bc im super moved by the lyrics or the history but just bc i had a *lot* going on lol
*[comedically thick breathing]* H-H-H-H--H-H hh Dear Evan Hanjian!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@doodoofartman dear evan hansen lmao i had to sing one of the songs from the musical for an elementary music class (i forgor which one tho)
This is probably one of the only channels you will find anti and pro chinese-government content lol
only rule here: no pro-japanese content lmao
@@zhonghuaxiansheng Why is this channel so based omg
@@zhonghuaxiansheng based
大跃进 文革 疫情清零
@@zhonghuaxiansheng based
“工人阶级在民主运动中失去的是锁链，得到的将是整个世界”--1989年首都工人自治联合会宣言
“凡是镇压学生运动的都没有好下场”--1966年6月3日毛泽东在政治局会议的讲话
You are missing one thing tho. Those “students” were funded and trained by the CIA. This is confirmed by declassified documents. Also worth noting that after they refused to accept anything less then the complete dissolution of the CPC they at that point were class enemy’s, counter-revolutionary, and reactionary. They did not want reform or change, they wanted the complete destruction of socialism within the PRC and replace it with western liberal “democracy” They at that point were no different then the fascist KMT, Russian White army, or German SA.
修正主义分子背叛了毛主席
RIP to both the soldiers and the students who died on that day.
Rest In Peace, or Rest In Power?
You ask me, Sherlock.
they should not rest
None of them should. Misery caused by the dictatorship has not ended.
I'm just gonna say it call me what you like I don't like what happened on that day I see it as wrong call me Hanjian call me stupid I see what happened that day as wrong
It could have been handled better without a doubt, but it’s worth mentioning the fact that the CPC order the protests to disband and vacate the area. Which most did. The only ones that remained were ones that had no interest in reform or negotiations? And who, from the start, were actively trying to force the CPC and PLA into a violent response. They received funding, and training by the CIA with the express purpose of destabilizing the PRC. Does that justify it? That’s up to personal opinion. As a Marxist Leninist myself I believe that while it could have been handled better, at the point at which the PLA is given the go ahead to open fire, all other options have been exhausted, the CPC tried negotiating, which most of the protesters where very open too, reaching many agreement, then after the CIA funded group began attacking and killing unarmed soldiers the protests where ordered to be disbanded, at which a majority of protesters obliged and left. At which point the only ones left where the ones who were actively seeking and would not settle for anything less the the complete destruction of the CPC and socialism in China. Personally I believe at that point they were counter-revolutionary’s and there for justified.
this hits particularly hard because here in Mexico we had a tragedy similar to the one of tiananmen long ago, every authoritarian government is equally afraid of the people. great song
Only 4 out of over 100 countries in Asia, Africa, and the Americas have entered developed economies in the past 40 years, and none of them were Western style democracies during their rise. The Han River miracle that created the rise of South Korea was led by authoritarian warlord Park Chung hee, the political powerhouse Lee Kuan yew who helped Singapore soar in Asia, Chiang Ching kuo who helped Taiwan's economy soar, and Hong Kong was governed by British inspectors who relied on China's import and export trade to soar. Why is it easy for a strong person to govern a country and make it rise? Companies in latecomer countries lack funds, technology, and complete competition to win over multinational corporations. Political elites extract funds from the bottom through strong national power to invest in industrialization. Large chaebols such as Samsung and LG in South Korea were supported by Park Chung hee, and the government provides low-interest loans to help key enterprises develop. Park Chung hee even used a gun to force chaebols to invest in South Korea's future pillar industries. The top ten construction projects in Taiwan, as well as semiconductor industries such as TSMC, were established during the Chiang Ching kuo era. If we fall into endless wrangling in a democratic government. In 1952, India's per capita GDP was higher than China's, and now China's per capita GDP is 5-6 times that of India.
Not sure about you but I value economic growth and for the safety of the nation and protected cultural values (looking at you ROC under DPP) and a socially conservative society with a mixed economy leaning more towards capitalism with some government protectionism then the if you ask me bullsh** of Social progressivism which threatens the stability of the nation which then threatens foreign investment.
But I don't know it's just me. A typical Lee Kuan Yew fan (a benevolent dictatorship)
@@theoriginalcornisgood2.0 most of which gave great results, but don´t justify tiananmen.
@@怪獸老哥 so the government killing thousands is ok? how exactly did this massacre help the country at all?
@@Blicero88 Justify what had happened or not. I personally see it as a necessary evil. This comes down. Social progressivism and major economic rush which could have caused what happened later to Russia when it got independence which if happened to China would have been much worse then what had happened to the Russian federation with Boris Yeltsin in power (I don't excuse Putin for anything so this is not a pro Putin statement)
Or
Increasing the economy gradually and slowly making sure all sectors can take time and modernise instead of rushing which would obviously cause many problems. Mao is a great example of rushing to modernise china since he started a famine. And keep in the socially conservative cultural thinking. Something if the protestors had their way mainland China would just be like how the ROC is under the DPP with all this woke acceptance liberal bs. This really comes under which you'd prefer. I'm a typical socially conservative person from South East Asia of Chinese decent with a centre right capitalist economic thinking. I'll go with the later so what happened at tiananmen was a necessary evil.
To quote Lee Kuan Yew as a supporter of him and his ideology of Asian Values,
"He took over and he said 'if I have to shoot 200,000 people to save China from another 100 years of disorder, so be it'"
Unfortunately, I couldn't find this song on the ist of Tiananmen songs on Chinese Wikipedia, and there are few videos on it on yt anyways.
I've decided what my next obession for the next few days is gonna be, thanks for introducing this absolute banger!
Only 4 out of over 100 countries in Asia, Africa, and the Americas have entered developed economies in the past 40 years, and none of them were Western style democracies during their rise. The Han River miracle that created the rise of South Korea was led by authoritarian warlord Park Chung hee, the political powerhouse Lee Kuan yew who helped Singapore soar in Asia, Chiang Ching kuo who helped Taiwan's economy soar, and Hong Kong was governed by British inspectors who relied on China's import and export trade to soar. Why is it easy for a strong person to govern a country and make it rise? Companies in latecomer countries lack funds, technology, and complete competition to win over multinational corporations. Political elites extract funds from the bottom through strong national power to invest in industrialization. Large chaebols such as Samsung and LG in South Korea were supported by Park Chung hee, and the government provides low-interest loans to help key enterprises develop. Park Chung hee even used a gun to force chaebols to invest in South Korea's future pillar industries. The top ten construction projects in Taiwan, as well as semiconductor industries such as TSMC, were established during the Chiang Ching kuo era. If we fall into endless wrangling in a democratic government. In 1952, India's per capita GDP was higher than China's, and now China's per capita GDP is 5-6 times that of India.
人民不会忘记♥️
人民不會忘記！
官僚 统治者会饶恕他们 人民不会饶恕
自由主义者和共产主义者站在了一块
谁愿意为自由而战并且以事实来证明其决心，谁就可以算是革命的民主主义者，必须力求与这样的人共同进行准备起义的工作（当然是在对这个人或这个团体完全信任的条件下）。必须把其他一切“民主主义者”当作假民主主义者，当作自由派的空谈家而严格地区分开来，对这些人绝对不能依靠，信任这些人对于革命者来说就是犯罪。
--列宁《革命军战斗队的任务》（1905年10月16日）
@@熊唯嘉列宁就是一个恶魔。
极大的讽刺。这是高级黑，低级红的结合体。
两个人都对文化和经济社会不利。
两个人都对文化和经济社会不利。
My father told me they Sang this at His School in 1979 ....
But 1979 was before the Tiananmen Square incident
Anti-ccp ≠ anti China
Communism ruined china!
Pro-ccp = anti-China
good
thank you
沒錯，我反共產黨，但我不反中，我反對的是中國共產黨，但大陸同胞不是全部都是共產黨，反而很多大陸同胞是期待民主的，包括了香港的同胞，西藏，新疆，以及整個內地的民運人士，加油，推翻共產中國，讓民主中國再次強大，讓全球華人可以享受台灣的民主自由，光復香港時代革命
光復大陸時代革命
驅逐馬列
恢復中華
Bro has posted so many pro-communism songs, but no one calls him commie. Yet once he posts a song that criticises the Chinese government, some people will call him betrayer. 😂
What you talking about?
True communists are opposed to the capitalist traitors of the the current Chinese gov
@@RedBird7you stupid
Yap goes hard
Critisze the chinese is normal its a proof that you aren’t dumb
四/六/一九八十九
人民不会忘记
4/6/1989, the people will not forget.
I'm as nationalistic as the next chap, but we all deserve to learn from the past, in one way or another.
As far as I know, those on the Square were nationalists, too. Maybe a different bunch of nationalists from today's?
@@熊唯嘉 It's hard to tell, but there's one thing that's for certain - they wanted the best for their country, same as any one of us
@@curtiswong7280 And yet, to whom does the country belong?
To allah @@熊唯嘉
太讽刺了，前进的路上不敢回头，不愿承认错误的自己
是这样的，近64了，有很多水军新号在骂抗议者
@@yanhuasanyue123sinx 因为这些学生领袖也是懦夫、恶心恶意传播，红兔也确实做了。但是被以讹传讹妖魔化了，所以封禁。这些学生也是暴民，打砸抢毁坏公物。真正的受害者是那些死去的学生。
@@yanhuasanyue123sinx幽默 经典账号论资排辈 骂目田的话感觉骂轻了
This song hits hard when you are low
I think the massage is that we shouldn’t forget the innocent lives who died in history
"不知道有多少 多少话还没讲"
"不知道有多少, 多少欢乐没享"
"不知道有多少, 多少人和我一样"
"不知道有多少, 多少个最后一枪"
❤
Nice! Your video quality is getting better and better :D Keep up the awesome work!
Shame on the Deng revisionist clique which massacred these good and decent students and abandoned all revolutionary ideals.
We shall not forget our fallen comrades!
Tiananmen Square Protests
(Also known as the June Fourth Incident)
In Western media, the well-known story of the "Tiananmen Square Massacre" goes like this: the Chinese government declared martial law in 1989 and mobilized the military to suppress students who were protesting for democracy and freedom. According to western sources, on June 4th of that year, troops and tanks entered Tiananmen Square and fired on unarmed protesters, killing and injuring hundreds, if not thousands, of people. The more hyperbolic tellings of this story include claims of tanks running over students, machine guns being fired into the crowd, blood running in the streets like a river, etc.
Anti-Communists and Sinophobes commonly point to this incident as a classic example of authoritarianism and political repression under Communist regimes. The problem, of course, is that the actual events in Beijing on June 4th, 1989 unfolded quite differently than how they were depicted in the Western media at the time. Despite many more contemporary articles coming out that actually contradict some of the original claims and characterizations of the June Fourth Incident, the narrative of a "Tiananmen Square Massacre" persists.
Background
After Mao's death in 1976, a power struggle ensued and the Gang of Four were purged, paving the way for Deng Xiaoping's rise to power. Deng initiated economic reforms known as the "Four Modernizations," which aimed to modernize and open up China's economy to the world. These reforms led to significant economic growth and lifted millions of people out of poverty, but they also created significant inequality, corruption, and social unrest. This pivotal point in the PRC's history is extremely controversial among Marxists today and a subject of much debate.
One of the key factors that contributed to the Tiananmen Square protests was the sense of social and economic inequality that many Chinese people felt as a result of Deng's economic reforms. Many believed that the benefits of the country's economic growth were not being distributed fairly, and that the government was not doing enough to address poverty, corruption, and other social issues.
Some saw the Four Modernizations as a betrayal of Maoist principles and a capitulation to Western capitalist interests. Others saw the reforms as essential for China's economic development and modernization. Others still wanted even more liberalization and thought the reforms didn't go far enough.
The protestors in Tiananmen were mostly students who did not represent the great mass of Chinese citizens, but instead represented a layer of the intelligentsia who wanted to be elevated and given more privileges such as more political power and higher wages.
Counterpoints
Jay Mathews, the first Beijing bureau chief for The Washington Post in 1979 and who returned in 1989 to help cover the Tiananmen demonstrations, wrote:
Over the last decade, many American reporters and editors have accepted a mythical version of that warm, bloody night. They repeated it often before and during Clinton’s trip. On the day the president arrived in Beijing, a Baltimore Sun headline (June 27, page 1A) referred to “Tiananmen, where Chinese students died.” A USA Today article (June 26, page 7A) called Tiananmen the place “where pro-democracy demonstrators were gunned down.” The Wall Street Journal (June 26, page A10) described “the Tiananmen Square massacre” where armed troops ordered to clear demonstrators from the square killed “hundreds or more.” The New York Post (June 25, page 22) said the square was “the site of the student slaughter.”
The problem is this: as far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square.
- Jay Matthews. (1998). The Myth of Tiananmen and the Price of a Passive Press. Columbia Journalism Review.
Reporters from the BBC, CBS News, and the New York Times who were in Beijing on June 4, 1989, all agree there was no massacre.
Secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing have shown there was no bloodshed inside the square:
Cables, obtained by WikiLeaks and released exclusively by The Daily Telegraph, partly confirm the Chinese government's account of the early hours of June 4, 1989, which has always insisted that soldiers did not massacre demonstrators inside Tiananmen Square
- Malcolm Moore. (2011). Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim
Gregory Clark, a former Australian diplomat, and Chinese-speaking correspondent of the International Business Times, wrote:
The original story of Chinese troops on the night of 3 and 4 June, 1989 machine-gunning hundreds of innocent student protesters in Beijing’s iconic Tiananmen Square has since been thoroughly discredited by the many witnesses there at the time - among them a Spanish TVE television crew, a Reuters correspondent and protesters themselves, who say that nothing happened other than a military unit entering and asking several hundred of those remaining to leave the Square late that night.
Yet none of this has stopped the massacre from being revived constantly, and believed. All that has happened is that the location has been changed - from the Square itself to the streets leading to the Square.
- Gregory Clark. (2014). Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth, All We're 'Remembering' are British Lies
Thomas Hon Wing Polin, writing for CounterPunch, wrote:
The most reliable estimate, from many sources, was that the tragedy took 200-300 lives. Few were students, many were rebellious workers, plus thugs with lethal weapons and hapless bystanders. Some calculations have up to half the dead being PLA soldiers trapped in their armored personnel carriers, buses and tanks as the vehicles were torched. Others were killed and brutally mutilated by protesters with various implements. No one died in Tiananmen Square; most deaths occurred on nearby Chang’an Avenue, many up to a kilometer or more away from the square.
More than once, government negotiators almost reached a truce with students in the square, only to be sabotaged by radical youth leaders seemingly bent on bloodshed. And the demands of the protesters focused on corruption, not democracy.
All these facts were known to the US and other governments shortly after the crackdown. Few if any were reported by Western mainstream media, even today.
- Thomas Hon Wing Palin. (2017). Tiananmen: the Empire’s Big Lie
(Emphasis mine)
And it was, indeed, bloodshed that the student leaders wanted. In this interview, you can hear one of the student leaders, Chai Ling, ghoulishly explaining how she tried to bait the Chinese government into actually committing a massacre. (She herself made sure to stay out of the square.): Excerpts of interviews with Tiananmen Square protest leaders
This Twitter thread contains many pictures and videos showing protestors killing soldiers, commandeering military vehicles, torching military transports, etc.
Following the crackdown, through Operation Yellowbird, many of the student leaders escaped to the United States with the help of the CIA, where they almost all gained privileged positions.
Additional Resources
Video Essays:
Truth about The Tiananmen Square Protests | Tovarishch Endymion (2019)
Tiananmen Square "Massacre", A Propaganda Hoax | TeleSUR English (2019)
All The Questions Socialists Are Asked, Answered (TIMESTAMPED) | Hakim (2021)
Books, Articles, or Essays:
Tiananmen Protests Reading List | Qiao Collective
How psy-ops warriors fooled me about Tiananmen Square: a warning | Nury Vittachi, Friday (2022)
1989: Tiananmen Square ‘massacre’ was a myth | Deirdre Griswold, Workers World (2022)
Massacre? What Massacre? 25 Years Later: What really happened at Tiananmen Square? | Kim Petersen, Dissident Voice (2014)
Tiananmen: The Massacre that Wasn’t | Brian Becker, Liberation News (2019)
Reflections on Tiananmen Square and the attempt to end Chinese socialism | Mick Kelly, FightBack! News (2019)
The Tian’anmen Square “Massacre” The West’s Most Persuasive, Most Pervasive Lie. | Tom, Mango Press (2021)
standing with these guys
不会忘记！
this is a really nice song
做得好加油
"Bombard the headquarters!" -Mao Zedong
Love how you switch to make more friction event song love it
当然不能忘记慌乱时代
所以时代才会变得更好
人民万岁！
自由派和毛派都来了？😂
@@blb992 热爱自由的人和自由主义者是不一样的
@@blb992you ldiot
极大的讽刺。这是高级黑，低级红的结合体。
@@blb992 人民不萬歲,難道獨裁者萬歲？😂
"My Anticommunist Songs playlist has 9. Come on."
These songs are not anti-communist, they're anti-authoritarian.
6 of the 9 songs are Kuomintang songs, which are hardly anti-authoritarian.
@@熊唯嘉 oh yeah, that can totally be the case. I was just talking about these protest songs like this one, "They" or "The people don't need freedom"
Very true, I just thought that was the best name to use. Frankly I don’t think this even in violation of the Communist philosophy.
《世界是你们的，也是我们的，但是归根结底是你们的。你们青年人朝气蓬勃，正在兴旺时期，好象早晨八、九点钟的太阳。希望寄托在你们身上。》
The Red Song playlist is also quite miscellaneous. Some are sincere revolutionary songs, while others are government propaganda.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other.
CCP may fall one day, but memories of struggle for freedom will live forever among people's hearts and minds.
I can't find any info about this song outside the firewall, can you give me more info?
Today is the 35th anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. Let us remember the courageous university students who fought for democracy, freedom of spech, and liberty. Let us support our friend's struggle fighting in Hong Kong.
香港加油 🇭🇰, 台灣萬歲 🇹🇼，人民不會忘記
支持在香港以民主跟自由的名义，烧杀抢掠？乱港份子，其心可诛😂
这首歌曲来源您怎么找到的?
人民加油，自由的種子一定會再次生根發芽。
没有人民的军队， 就没有人民的一切， 枪杆子里出政权
the song that was never sung about the event that never happened
where can I find more information about this song and the singer? 在哪里可以找到有关这首歌和歌手的更多信息？
俺也知不道
I respect both students and soldiers both had their reason to be there
and their reason is terrorism. new place discovered for you: prison
Why did you upload 4 minutes of black screen?
my apolochinese
人民万岁！
这首歌送给现在美国的学运正好😂
where did you get the footages from dear sir
It's giving Ballada o Janku Wiśniewskim
Hope that someday as China become more wealthy and stable, China and the Chinese people will be ready for democracy.
And that democracy should be its own form, a little bit similar to that if the west, and one’s that still good enough to keep the nation United.
Unfortunately, money corrupts.
Many mistake democracy as some institution; worse off, there are some who even see it as some sort of ideal. No, democracy is not some madame in fur, nor some damsel in distress, but a Valkyrie of revolution. Democracy is people's power, and the people should wield it on the streets, against their enemies.
@@熊唯嘉 Democracy is not just an ideal for a revolution, though in the past to transition from a traditional feudal outdated society to a new modern one, a revolution is needed to install one. To me a democracy is basically an idea of giving powers to the people, to allow them to decide on how their nation should be run by electing politicians who will represent them & that the politicians should do what’s best for all people and the nation as a whole.
However it’s a power that the people should know how to use it in the right way to elect better and competent leaders, who will actually bring good changes to the nation and protect the nation from foreign threats, not a leader who will always lie to the citizens as a way to be elected, and later on in power failed to meet the goal that they promise to the people and always accept bribe for their own personal need.
@@codyshi4743 Democracy is not about "giving" powers to the people; it's about we the people seizing power for ourselves. It's not about finding some good masters to rule us with benevolence, but about forcing our masters to bend to our will, eventually overthrowing them. In this sense, democracy is still vibrant in the United States, not because people get to vote, but because people get to go on streets and participate in political empowerment; in this sense, democracy is inherently anti-government, and its natural conclusion is anarchy.
@@熊唯嘉 If you say we the people seizing power ourselves, but in the end, we the people would still need someone to be put into power, so they are the ones who will be doing our work and works that would benefit us the people who put them there. There can never be a true democracy like that of ancient Greece, in this modern world, because there always gonna needs to be one or a group of people being put in charge to ensure peace, stability, progress, and order in the society and the nation as a whole, but we can hope that those who are put in charge would do the work to ensure that the government is doing what would be beneficial to the majority of the people that would benefit in the present and the long run.
I kind of agree and disagree about what you said about the US still being vibrant in democracy. Because like yeah we do have the right to go out and protest to demand change, but however, some people took this protest too way far and abused their rights, which led to many riots and destruction being taken place in some parts of the nation, which in turn created no safety and stability for business owners and the common citizens. Having the right to protest and express your political opinion is really important, but however, "with many rights also comes many responsibilities" and that is to know how to use them in the right way instead of using them in the wrong way, which in turn would harm the freedom of other individuals.
Sun Yat Sen(Founding father of modern China & Forerunner of the democratic revolution) once said: "An individual should not have too much freedom. A nation should have absolution freedom."
巨人在向前走，卻從不敢回頭
客观的说这歌病恹恹的 一种无病呻吟的感觉 丝毫提不起人革命的动机
好歌！
Ironic that CCP party commemorate the may 4th movement on 1919 but decide censored anything related june 4th
"They marched on Beijing, just like in 1989."
"The government was bad."
"Who cares, thats what they did!"
"They resisted the Japanese they did! They were brave anti-colonialist warriors! And in this house, the May Fourth movement students were heroes, end of story!"
@@zhonghuaxiansheng Meanwhile... th-cam.com/video/_ChHGX2_fw4/w-d-xo.html
But at the same time, the June 4th movement is always being talked more often out in the west and little does the west pay any attention to the May 4th movement.
@@zhonghuaxiansheng
五四运动里学生领袖可没拿CIA的脏钱
有更多关于本歌曲作者的资料吗？
羅曉桐写的
自由终会引领人民，而不是由少数野心家
80s 0:25 90s 0:27 😊❤🎉 2023❤😊🎉
他们会付出代价✋
When I see the Statue of Liberty on the square, this movement is destined to not have my support.
It's so obvious that it was an attempt at colour revolution, backed by foreign assets. Only the truly brainwashed think it was some sort of democratic little nice movement.
Alternative title for the communist edition:
The People Will Forget.
我很好奇这首歌到底是代表自由派还是代表左派
说来也是，当时搞得左不左右不右的，中共受两头架😂
代表本次运动所有民主人士，涵盖工人“毛左”和学生“自由派”
Zhonghuaminguo Wansui! 🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼
chinese flag changed teams??
When you get killed after trying to hijack guns of the soldiers
笑死我了
As a socialist, screw the CCP, may the people of China be free
Beautiful song by the way, thanks for posting it
"socialist"
@@TheBigWall3284Yeah, I believe the workers should own and manage their means of production
Which China doesn’t do lol
Being Socialist doesn’t mean your support the red team, it’s an ideology
@@Robot_GEANT作为一个社会主义者，我建议你将中国共产党分成两个时期来研究，before Mao and after Mao.
Long live China 🇹🇼🫡
how many ppl has forgotten Iraq war? Afghan war? nobody care what you think Mister Banana.
@@ericwong4213 I agree and tbh I might take this video down
愿世上没有战争
所以还共享单车比自由民主还重要？
1989年，自由民主的幌子，毁灭了世界上所有的民主阵营。
极大的讽刺。这是高级黑，低级红的结合体。
当时中国很穷，毕竟那个年代自行车很少人拥有，家里有自行车算是小康家庭了
这首歌叫什么名字？
人民不会忘记-罗晓桐
人民的尊严自由最后是否会崩溃？
唉
屠龙少年终成恶龙！
我不好评价
May the light of peace and liberty find you in the darkest days. You are the true China that freedom awaits! God bless! ✌🕯
35
Based and redpilled
maybe REDpill isnt the best word to use for this
@@zhonghuaxiansheng can we get this man a true?
were you replaced by a hanjian clone ?
No mao zedong no Chinese 😁
Everyone never forget nothing ever happened that day. It was a mediocre day of dope. It was boring just like everyday.
-Truth
四五运动四人邦都没动学生们一根毫毛😂
毕竟学生不杀人啊，你看完89的事你就知道了，注定不会得到人民的支持
目田好似开香槟
首都卫士们还是太克制了
法西斯前途了
@@赛永获
你敢反对以色列？你说这话什么意思，是什么目的？谁指示你说的？
确实好似，目田一定不是威权的解药
思想配得上苦难
我是住在香港的居民，年少時看到89民運，當時是激動的同情的，年月漸長，開始見到民運領袖那些嘴臉真實想法，親身經歷香港黑暴，89只是發生於中國颜色革命，希望中國分裂，再看中國今日成就，西方用盡所有下三流手段對付，看這段片及歌曲已經覺得假資訊太多太多，期待中國在本世紀末完成使命，統一台灣。
万岁 to the brave PLA soldiers who sacrificed themselves on this day to prevent CIA-backed Color Revolution, thereby ensuring the future prosperity and stability of the PRC state for decades to come.
“Order prevails in Warsaw!” “Order prevails in Paris!” “Order prevails in Berlin!” Every half-century that is what the bulletins from the guardians of “order” proclaim from one center of the world-historic struggle to the next. And the jubilant “victors” fail to notice that any “order” that needs to be regularly maintained through bloody slaughter heads inexorably toward its historic destiny; its own demise.
It's more like in the middle. Because I really doubt the June 1 report that hardliners like Li Peng merely crafted to convince Deng to follow them instead of the moderates. Not every uprising is a CIA plot, sometimes the people are just really pissed off at the leaders.
@@熊唯嘉 Lol, the rioters attacked PLA soldiers, what were they supposed to do? Act like stoic philosophers?
@@koikat3708 We may be asked, do we not find a tear, a sigh, a word for the victims of the people's wrath, for the National Guard, the mobile guard, the republican guard and the line?
The state will care for their widows and orphans, decrees extolling them will be issued, their remains will be carried to the grave in solemn procession, the official press will declare them immortal, the European reaction in the East and the West will pay homage to them.
But the plebeians are tormented by hunger, abused by the press, forsaken by the physicians, called thieves, incendiaries and galley-slaves by the respectabilities; their wives and children are plunged into still greater misery and the best of those who have survived are sent overseas. It is the right and the privilege of the democratic press to place laurels on their gloomy threatening brow.
--Karl Marx, “The June Revolution” (1848)
Your totalitarian mom was also CIA backed, ya brainwashed authoritarian.
Communist party good
mao zedong good
😁mao zedong buddhism😁👍
hanjian
收皮啦，光明正大的华人明白我们国家好事坏事都做过
@@curtiswong7280han dogs gao nuzai
Something has been wrong,Taiwan not belonging to China,but the map of China in the video include Taiwan.I hope you can correct the mistake, thanks
名义拥有，实未控
幸亏这些B没有成功，
不然中国现在不知道有多惨。。
幽默老保
@@AlfrediaAlcott 幽默目田
@@Maplin-Ma幽默反动派
粉红是这样的
你當然慘啦
Why'd you delete my comment lmao
Did I? Maybe it wasn't approved, I'll fix that now.
@@zhonghuaxiansheng ah okay thanks
@@koikat3708 not there so idk what to tell you lmao
@@zhonghuaxiansheng welp
Creepy my comment was deleted too wasn't censored? was it?
共产党好