ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2020
- Canadian Forces Training Video Series.
Produced for the Department of National Defence, 1995.
CAF Catalogue # 25-0557C5.
For those inquiring on the title, the name will stay the same as per what the Canadian Forces labelled the video as, and was printed on the original case & VHS tape as can be seen at here: imgur.com/JB5LR7k
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 2 // PRX vs G2 | EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T5j2XVcDFs0/mqdefault.jpg)
I remember being made to stand and applaud after every one of these videos.
There’s no army like old army eh?
@@jaredpeabody894 for sure
Its a recoilless rifle,- not a rocket launcher. In the danish army it is called "The nozzle cannon"
Or the Kickless Cannon. We used to call it the Charlie Guts Ache.
Yup you are right.. I was Canadin infantry 16 years..we love those baby's.. we just sent 800 to Ukrane..to help put a hurting on the Russians.. if we called anything the wrong name, it was only did it once.. lol
In the era of the video 1995, this weapon was referred to as the 84mm Short Range Anti-Armour Weapon (SRAAW-Medium) the Eryx System was the SRAAW-Heavy( and the M72-C7 was the SRAAW_Light.
8:36 doesn't look like a rifle round to me
@@areolaman look at it better.
CLOSE VENTURI LOCK!!!! LMAO Once a Patricia always a Patricia!!!! When I was in we only had iron sights. LOL Fuck!! We only had the old orange ear plugs!! LOL Ah the Vingt-Deux!!! crazy bastards!!! LMAO Fuck I miss this!!!!
This channel is legendary
Did you know that there is a maximum of rounds individuals can fire in a day (I think its 10). Purpose is to mitigate Traumatic Brain Injury
I guess that is a part of my PTSD
We had lots of Rds on my TQ3 then I went to wpns det and later served in AAPl. My hearing was noticeably fading at 43. I was paid out for hearing loss by 48. I soon developed inner ear problems. I wore ear def and plugs 90 per cent when firing. Take care of yourselves troops. My inner ear issues are mentally and physically challenging. CG is a great system regardless. 1946 and still ticking along!
@@miklmiklmtrcycl6009 funny you mention it. I was RSO last week on a AT range where we fired 200 HEAT rounds. Even with double ear pro I felt buzzed at the end of the day
I checked the official manufacturer manual and its 6 rounds/day
@@petermontagnon4440 you may have TBI compounding your PTSD, or you could even have just TBI and be misdiagnosed entirely. Symptoms do overlap in many ways.
btw, now if i were to defend this room, i would also make a defence position beneath outside of the room, so it could provide me with a good position. I will never forget that.
Great fun firing these in the 70's. Like being punched in the face.
It still a effective weapon to day with modern enivation
What?? No canvas and wood storage sack? Damn! Tupperware makes fakin' everything...!
That’s the M2
VP!
Remember shooting .22 cal out of these guns? lol
We had a 6.5 mm Swedish tracer inserts. But we did have a .22 kit for the FN C1 (FAL)
7.62 insert for me……early 90’s
My 20s LOL
LOL... this vid has the same quality as early 90s porn VHS
this is obviously not a 45 ACP pistol LOL
Recoilless rifle. NOT rocket launcher
Your comment successfully irritated myself, as I strive to keep as much original information from the VHS copied into these uploads. Therefore, I searched for the original tape to verify the information.
The VHS has "The Carl Gustav M3 Rocket Launcher" on both its cover and tape. Therefore, the name will stay for historical preservation.
@@A_Ryan I spent 35 years in the Canadian infantry. Earnst humpry is correct. It is NOT a 'rocket launcher'. It is a recoilless rifle. The VHS trg video is wrong. It was common for people to refer to equipment and weapons systems by incorrect nick names. This should have been caught by whoever reviewed the video. It was likely made in conjunction with the Public Affairs Branch (who don't know all that much about the finer points of weapon terminology) and may have been put together using a civilian contractor.
Whoever wrote the script should be smacked. Whoever proof read the script should be smacked. I was hoping to catch some names in the credits but they were cut off. The fact that most of the participants are Vandoos may have something to do with proper terminology being 'lost in translation'.
@@A_Ryan That's your choice of course. But using incorrect terminology does not lend you much technical credence, any more than referring to a tank gun, as a 'fire-stick.'
@@digitalprismatics This is the copy of the VHS that was uploaded. DND labelled it so, and so the title will remain.
imgur.com/JB5LR7k
@@lib556 I played the original video back. Instead of replacing the video, I'll transcribe the credits here:
Participating Unit
R22eR Battle School
Technical Advisor
Wo Armand Vinet
MCpl Terry Garand
Coordinator LFCHQ
Maj Yves Pelletier
Producers
John Rodger DND
Manon Cormier PWGSC
Produced for
the Department of National Defence
by
Multi-Bet Vidéo
© Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1995
It's not a rocket launcher it's a recoiless rifle.
FFS, get it right, you silly commentator. That's a recoilless rifle, NOT a rocket launcher. And you claim to be a channel that shows training videos, yet can't get that right.
imgur.com/JB5LR7k
The label on the VHS that this video is from.
@@A_Ryan oh, I guess my comment should have been addressed to them.