Good review. Some items to add. Fuel tank below cab is to maintain front/ rear weight distribution as fuel is burned off. Open rear architecture is allow a ball hitch for gooseneck applications like slurry tankers or scrapers. Also to add commodity tanks for liquids.
I think having def would be better than egr def is an after treatment and doesn’t harm the engine and egr does shorten engine life also getting rid of the dpf is a good deal we have a lot more problems with dpf and egr related issues than we do with the def system def also allows the engine manufacturers to tune the engine for performance and longer life and better fuel economy
@@zimmhollowfarm8414 As someone who has def in my car, I'm sincerely curious what is so bad about it. Does it not work well with high horsepower application?
The stuff crystallizers very bad on the side of containers. Also, if you look at the side of the highways in California now versus about 2000, the highways were nice and green and now they’re brown and dead. and it also is just a government gimmick to make money. It does not help at all.
Seems like the fuel tank should ha e been bigger. But probably a fuel tank add on available. Working it hard is 11 hours of use. But maybe this is hour range is fairly normal for equipment. But 11 hours one is covering alot of ground with this. Do they have equipment to actually use this tractors full capacity? Probably working on it. Probably have some now. Of course the idea of this is to pull high speed equipment. Really cover alot of acres fast using less labor. Like self checkout. Labor ain't cheap anymore.
They had to relocate the hydraulic tank when they moved the fuel tank to the center. So now the hydraulic tank is above the rear axle. They put the hydraulic pumps directly under the hydraulic tank for gravity flow to them. Also much easier to adjust or replace the pumps back there. Also the gearbox that drives the hydraulic pumps i believe has the pto drive in it as well. Also better hydraulic efficiency when the hydraulic pumps are close to the rear scv stack for flow to implements.
I found this direct from Deere's website: Rear 3-Point Hitch-Lift Capacity Handle some of the largest mounted implements in the industry, including large planters and air-seeding rigs. Most 9RX models can be equipped with a rear hitch to handle up to 20,000 pounds (9,071.8 kg).
T4A emissions systems, EGR is garbage and not the way. Would rather burn DEF, be better on fuel and not have to deal with EGR. Liebherr built the engine but Mother Deere painted it green and called it their own.
million dollar tractor for less than millionaire farmers ... they obviously are rich in asset but what goes in their pocket at the end of the year is very different
Those tractors were designed for out west and Canada in the middle of nowhere so they can load and pull those 100’ air drills towing 850 bushel carts up the hills. I’m under the impression they often times only can fill the carts half full due to power/traction issues with that type terrain. Think back why big bud and others came about in history. I do like Deere so understand I’m not bashing them. The corn belt states imo is a second thought. The tractor is a sharp design.
I agree that’s their target market since I live here in SK where there is 100ft air drills getting around John Deere is doing a piss pour job marketing this tractor. At least show it pulling a P690 air drill with the 850 cart not a 60ft any large tractor on market can pull that and bigger
@@prairiestatetractor there are multiple articles online about this “joint venture” between mother deere and Deutz AG. This 18L, Deutz has been on the market since 2018.
Good review. Some items to add. Fuel tank below cab is to maintain front/ rear weight distribution as fuel is burned off. Open rear architecture is allow a ball hitch for gooseneck applications like slurry tankers or scrapers. Also to add commodity tanks for liquids.
You are a really good speaker. I really liked your explanation of these machines.
Great overview! Thanks for all the info!
Thanks for watching!
1.1 million is crazy 💀
After seeing this how can can people not love John Deere
Because they are a greedy corporation
Because of the price tag
@@dolphlyn a farm close to us bought a 9rx 830 and paid 1.8 million
@@JackPerrenoud..What is your definition of a greedy company and how does JD meet that definition ?
Proprietary exclusivity JD dosen't play well with others $
What a great explanation ❤ Great Job
Thank you! 😃
I used to be a John Deere salesman in Ohio, I could have never been able to give an explanation like yours. 👍
I think having def would be better than egr def is an after treatment and doesn’t harm the engine and egr does shorten engine life also getting rid of the dpf is a good deal we have a lot more problems with dpf and egr related issues than we do with the def system def also allows the engine manufacturers to tune the engine for performance and longer life and better fuel economy
You don’t know much about def. That stuff is very harmful.
@@zimmhollowfarm8414 As someone who has def in my car, I'm sincerely curious what is so bad about it. Does it not work well with high horsepower application?
The stuff crystallizers very bad on the side of containers. Also, if you look at the side of the highways in California now versus about 2000, the highways were nice and green and now they’re brown and dead. and it also is just a government gimmick to make money. It does not help at all.
Great job, good questions and answers. I think you will sell more than you think....
I'dlike to see wider tracks on the new 9RX. 48" and 54" being available.
Great video! thanks.
Im supprised it took a mfg this long to add power to avoid src and dpf
Can't wait to play with one on Farming Simulator
Coming soon I hope
@@prairiestatetractor if I had one I would delete the mufler and run straight pipe.
I’m still a ih person but I mean it actually is interesting
Will the normal range 9RX still be available from 2025 and if so will they also get the facelift to look like the new design?
Why isn't the Power bulge horsepower the number that is the rated horsepower? Why isn't it a 9Rx913?
Thats a nh thing
Seems like the fuel tank should ha e been bigger.
But probably a fuel tank add on available.
Working it hard is 11 hours of use.
But maybe this is hour range is fairly normal for equipment.
But 11 hours one is covering alot of ground with this.
Do they have equipment to actually use this tractors full capacity?
Probably working on it. Probably have some now.
Of course the idea of this is to pull high speed equipment.
Really cover alot of acres fast using less labor.
Like self checkout.
Labor ain't cheap anymore.
John Deere all the way
When are they going to offer a 42" wide track?
Caterpillar C 15 Acer motors used EGR and had to be rebuilt at 3 to 400,000 miles. Are you sure hope this doesn’t happen to these new large beast
Is there a suitable range of wide field equipment for the 830 to pull that utilises the horsepower?
Well if you pull a drill with a fully loaded cart up a hill that will certainly use the extra power.
The quadtracs in the back: 🥸🥸
Trade-ins on Deere quads that need a new home
Will they be able to do this with the 8r and 8rx tractors
No
I’d like to see this hooked to 3 John Deere pans
Wonder if I can get one with a 72" belly mower for my 2.5 acres?
While that would be a sight to see, we have compact tractors for that my friend 🤣
@@prairiestatetractor -My 1025r does great 👍🏻
im a caseih guy but this tractor is pritty cool
how much dose it cost
Great video
I see the hydraulic pumps on the back just wondering what the reason is for that
They had to relocate the hydraulic tank when they moved the fuel tank to the center. So now the hydraulic tank is above the rear axle. They put the hydraulic pumps directly under the hydraulic tank for gravity flow to them. Also much easier to adjust or replace the pumps back there. Also the gearbox that drives the hydraulic pumps i believe has the pto drive in it as well. Also better hydraulic efficiency when the hydraulic pumps are close to the rear scv stack for flow to implements.
Will there be a three Point Hitch option in the future?
I found this direct from Deere's website:
Rear 3-Point Hitch-Lift Capacity
Handle some of the largest mounted implements in the industry, including large planters and air-seeding rigs. Most 9RX models can be equipped with a rear hitch to handle up to 20,000 pounds (9,071.8 kg).
When this comes out, let’s put renalmanbuch inside of the cab
Might need a Mr Beast style 24 hour challenge @rentalmanbuch living in there 😂
Price ?
We talk about it in the video 👍
I wonder how it will compare to the Case IH 920
They don’t make a 920 quad track
Biggest case quadtrac at the moment is the 715. It has 715hp but can boost to 778hp so John Deere's new tractor is a fair bit more powerful.
Given the 920 doesn’t exist I imagine the Deere will win
Not twin turbocharged…it’s compound turbocharged big difference
Not hate on the new John Deere I love John Deere I just don't like the way that the new John Deere front end looks
Truck manufacturers need to up engine hp to get around the emission bullshit that the govt exempts themselves from.
T4A emissions systems, EGR is garbage and not the way. Would rather burn DEF, be better on fuel and not have to deal with EGR.
Liebherr built the engine but Mother Deere painted it green and called it their own.
million dollar tractor for less than millionaire farmers ... they obviously are rich in asset but what goes in their pocket at the end of the year is very different
Tracks are not for everyone who require high hopes…
Those tractors were designed for out west and Canada in the middle of nowhere so they can load and pull those 100’ air drills towing 850 bushel carts up the hills. I’m under the impression they often times only can fill the carts half full due to power/traction issues with that type terrain. Think back why big bud and others came about in history. I do like Deere so understand I’m not bashing them. The corn belt states imo is a second thought. The tractor is a sharp design.
I agree that’s their target market since I live here in SK where there is 100ft air drills getting around John Deere is doing a piss pour job marketing this tractor. At least show it pulling a P690 air drill with the 850 cart not a 60ft any large tractor on market can pull that and bigger
@@alexwaldner818well they do say that compared to the 9rx 640 it can pull twice the cart load and go 1mph faster while doing it.
will it be able for fall tillage
Did you not watch the video? He literally said when it goes into production. Lol
18 L Deutz powerplant with JD badging makes it proprietary sorta like the 7.3 power stroke was a Navistar power plant in a Ford super duty
The John Deere JD18 18L engine is manufactured at the John Deere Engine Works plant in Waterloo, Iowa
@@prairiestatetractor there are multiple articles online about this “joint venture” between mother deere and Deutz AG. This 18L, Deutz has been on the market since 2018.
The Duetz partnership is for the new JD4 engine, they announced it, but it's not out yet
Can you get that with tires
The guy in the video gave a clear answer as to why it is only available as a tracked machine - rewatch.
$1.1M USD for a loaded up 9RX 830? That’s a very good price.
That is a bargain. My 8R 310hp tractor cost $450k,,,,,so, you are getting 3x the hp for 2x the cost.
Green junk.