dude X on watchlist, tech videos, kittens, kittens, kittens, tech videos, homework... not a real threat, but look lovely kittens! dude Y on watchlist, tech videos, the OTHER kind of youtube... lonely guy, one of our honey traps would have him singing like a bird in like 15 minutes, and then a two years trial for harrasment and a restraining order... not a threat- dude Z on watchlist, tech videos, tech videos, tezzzzzz... yet more tech videos? thid dude has no time to do anything, he just watches tech videos! GET A F*N life looser the other guy meanwhile finishes a degree in engineering by attending public libraries...
This video is impressive since it is a very sleek guide on how to make a rocket with a 3d printer as well as being a tutorial on how to get on half a dozen countries watch lists.
@@fallinginthed33p Not at all, they're millions of miles ahead of this kind of shit, and are in the backroom watching this video going, here's X,Y,Z problems with your design, and this is why I can go take lunch now.
when everyone has their own personal targetting drone and a backpack of missiles, everyone will finally be safe from guns. I see things getting drastically safer because of this
Actually my jaw dropped to this project. I felt the dedication and work to this rocket and its beyond awesome. It may not work properly because of the refresh rate of camera because it may not be enough for up to mach 0.4-0.6 speeds but man, engineering at that pieces really impressed me. I support your job and cant wait to see more!
See Conical scanning detailed on Wikipedia. Have rocket spin. simple IR sensor to view off axis by a few degrees. And use a single pair of guidance vanes
This is really good. Instead of staring array configuration you might consider mounting camera to brushless gimbal. And instead of conventional serial kinematic configuration, use a parallel kinematics. Then use the rate gyros to stabilize camera. You would need a decent dsp. If you made something larger you could make an inertial platform using control moment gyros.
@@nadhirboukorsi7242 well this is why I said if it were larger. Placing a stabilized gimbal would allow for better integration of signal on the seeker head. The motion of the target and maneuvering of the missile can blur the image. Missiles move incredibly fast, so do their targets. Placing it on a gimbal also allows for the missile to decouple its maneuvers with its field of view
@@nadhirboukorsi7242 well certainly if you’re talking about some kind of control algorithm. But he could get the gimbal stabilization stuff done even in flight.
I think just having this hanging on your wall occasionally every few hours doing a fin test would be awesome. The cradle arm on one of them would have the charge points built in. Rocket would have to metal rings like a head phone plug. So that no matter how you set it back down it would have power. Like a talking bass fish that randomly talk this missile/rocket would randomly fin move :) Ok now I have to see what the technical difference between rocket and missile are.
What a time to be alive. People printing air defense tech in their hobby rooms. Imagine telling that the engineers working on the first AIM9 Sidewinder. "Yo bro, in about 70 years from now people will just make these at home from off the shelves parts, coding the targeting algorithms from scraps scavanged from public resources".
"coding the targeting algorithms from scraps scavanged from public resources" did you mean: "asking a free to use artificial intelligence to write the code for them" :P
Bro, you literally made my dream come true, I am also involved in rocket modeling, and I can say that the most difficult thing in this rocket is stabilization, I’m interested in what kind of gyroscopes you use on the rocket
The fins are too large for the speed and will require a great deal of torque to move. You might be better served with a double delta canard fin system like the Israeli Python. It also gets the control mechanisms away from the motor. If you motor will only drive it to 400mph or less and it's pointed in the right direction it could work quite well. I know beam rider tech gets fancy fast. I think it's a great project for a first attempt. You should look around the world at aero tech and how speed, & acceleration play important roles in design. Maybe a job at Raytheon is in your future!
You can get reduction gear assemblies or make them. I saw a later video that you missed your target after it went by, that's the controls not able to get enough action from the control surfaces. If you go to a front steer double canard you use smaller controls in parallel so you can get more action with the torque you have. Half the surface area on each rudder but having two parallel rudders doubles the torque available to each surface. Or go to a faster responding and larger servo motor. Also, a first stage high acceleration short burn motor would help you get up to speed faster and on to the sustainer motor.@@nadhirboukorsi7242
Once it's guided isn't it a missile? I've some doubts whether it'd withstand the forces exercised at flight. Are those digital servos? Aren't most missiles guided from the front control surfaces with rear ones really for stability? Overall it's a very interesting project, a cool mock missile, but if it can fly someday it'd also be a dangerous tool.
No front control surfaces have a positive feedback problem. Part of why the weight flyer was hard to control, and it’s why the euro fighter needs computerized control of its canards
@@octoniumvideos Yeah, that's called Reactive Control Systems usually, and it's much more reliable than control surfaces since it's much less dependent on the airstream conditions. Just tiny gas thrusters using something like compressor bleed air are able to produce fine maneuvering control with response time and accuracy that surfaces could never hope to match.
Rear fins control is more stable for rockets and missiles. There is some aerodynamic problems (some type of turbulence) generated by moving canards that affects the stability generated by the rear fins and that affects the control system. Not always but it´s an issue. Cheers!
Man this is cool af. Ngl, I want the files. Not because I’d be able to make a functional copy (far from it, I’m not nearly smart enough with electronics unfortunately), but it just looks really cool and would be a dope prop to have laying around. Edit: spelling
@@koolkiddie1. I've got plenty on model rockets already... 2. I build and display models. Cars, spaceships, planes, and yes a few rockets. Also a few movie props like the Blade Runner Decker pistol and the Fatman from Fallout. 3. I wouldn't be putting electronics in it. I don't have the programming skills for that.
@@DarthCrumbie you dont understand what I'm trying to say. A car without fuel in it is still a car. If those wings are movable with all the housing features inside the body, it's an active part
Awesome video and great looking parts! Cant wait to see it in flight. You think the turbulent flow caused by the servos disrupting the airflow will have a significant impact on the control of the rocket? I think it might introduce some very annoying speed dependent non-linearities.
I think the temperature of the rocket motor travelling through the innards of this “rocket” would have a far greater effect on the plastic parts this thing is made of.
I think the temperature of the rocket motor travelling through the innards of this “rocket” would have a far greater effect on the plastic parts this thing is made of.
This is amazing. I've been fascinated with rockets all my life but haven't had time to devote to building anything. Looks like a fun project, good luck!
Very nice 3-d printing! I recommend a simpler level-plane aerospace system. 4 independently-controlled fins is not easily forming an aerodynamic plane. Instead form the plane to roll left and roll right, then an elevator prop for altitude adjustment. Hope it landed well!
I think it's worth making one low FPS camera to track the overall picture and one high FPS camera to accurately target the target. It might be worth making several fixed low-speed cameras with low FPS and overlapping viewing areas.
Are you bringing that up to point out how people building missiles in their houses isn't a problem, because GPS will shut down? Or are you pointing out the reason a person would want visual guidance on their home-built rocket is because GPS is going to shut down on them, and they're going to need some other data to control navigation with?
First off, People in rocketry have figured this out long ago., secondly he's already making his own PCB hardware. making a gps receiver to work at those speeds is old hat. 3rd sure yes strap your car tom tom to a rocket it wont record the gps beacons for a number of reasons. This is some boomer urban legend BS. even Mythbusters was using consumer gps on thier rocket projects.. this myth keeps coming up.. it was old in 1980
It’s a beautiful and brilliant design but those control surfaces are moving WAY too much for a rocket. They need to only move a fraction of what you currently have or the rocket will be completely unstable in flight.
Real missiles have that amount of control surface deflection and even more. There's a test of an AIM-9X rear fins and thrust vectoring unit in icing conditions on youtube showing just how much they move, looks like up to 50-70º against the airflow
@@Lemard77 Real missiles also have very advanced control systems to handle that amount of deflection. Does a hobby missile really need to make right angle turns at 200MPH?
This is amazing, but i dont think it should even be that complex. For Ukraine their main concern is Orlan-10 drones which really increased in numbers lately, and russians were able to synchronize them with artillery crews so as soon as Ukrainians move or do anything they get pounded with accurate artillery. Orlan is not a fast target, i think it moves at less than 200km/h and it generally circles the area or otherwise stays in the area, so if you manage 200-250km/h speed you can intercept it, i believe. I think something like a Multiplex FunJet or similar flying wing airframe with a hot 6s+ motor and battery setup can manage 200-250km/h, i think the hardest part would be creating a lightweight but effective warhead and detonation method, i'm surprised that Ukrainian (or russian) drone makers still didnt come up with something like that, it can even damage helicopters if it catches one on a head to head course
Taking notes while in Ukraine. I don't think it's that smart to try and 3D print surface-to-air missiles for our warzone, what would be sick is strapping one to a decent UAV and launching air-to-air. Such missile can be much more compact since yes, it is only meant against slower targets, and it will get drone's speed added to the thrust of its engine, however there likely won't be GPS available and that's a problem
Usually once u start guiding rockets, distributing source code might get u a visit from a few 3 letter agencys 😔. Mark Rober and Joe Barnard (BPS space) ran into this
I remember someone did a project like this many years ago. Almost pre-internet. An optically-guided model rocket. I searched for years to find it and never could. Always wondered what had become of the video...
Очень круто! Наверное надо быстродействие поднимать типа 1000 кадров в секунду минимум. У нас за такой проект даже в целях саморазвития можно тобой сильно заинтересуются люди "в штатском" )
Wow given the ever growing hostile and endless aggressive nature of that collective west it's about time this ends up in everyone's home for protection. Way to go guys.
You could save the lives of many unarmed women and children. A lot people are hoping something similar can solve their combat drone problems. Any chance you could be persuaded to put the CAD files online? Very impressive. Can't wait for the balloon test.
Is he trying to make a self navigating ballistic missile, which will look for the red dot and set it as target😂😂 Since the camera is placed at the nose cone it looks like he is not trying to do propulsion based landing(slr) but parachute based landing on a precise location. But you can always use a gps to get your location, and navigate accordingly so i am not getting why did he had make things complicated 😅
The camera is being used to locate a red balloon (as said in the description), so this is a surface to air missile rather than a ballistic one. The camera is necessary to detect and track the balloon’s relative position.
reading the description is a smart thing to do ^^ "Due to the limitations of the guidance camera's performance, this project adopts a staged guidance strategy. In the initial stage of the launch, the rocket will rely on an inertial navigation system (INS) and a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) for trajectory control. Once the target enters the effective recognition range of the camera, the system will automatically switch to vision-based terminal guidance."
@@lorenzcyber Thanks for reading the description for us lazy viewers. I went down the comments before checking the description. "reading the description is a smart thing to do" I might try that in the future myself. Thanks again.
So if this works as designed...please adapt the logic to take down recon drones, do laser spot tracking, carry a 2 pound warhead and send all the plans, circuit designs etc to Ukraine. They really need cheap ground launched guided weapon capabilities. This seems like a mass production dream.
Unfortunately 3D printing is not very suitable for mass production. Unless the missile is resistant to electronic interference I wouldn't see any significant advantages over drones other than not requiring as much skill. Modified FPV drones can be relatively cheap (by military standards), and when flown by skilled operators can be very accurate. Drones are usually a lot more portable than rockets. The downsides of a drone is electronic interference.
The only part that gets me to wonder is how a microprocessor can be that fast at image recognition, yet I am struggling to get a damn STT Model on my Raspberry PI running in a reasonable time
ive been watching a lot of these types of videos lately... _Why, no FBI agent, I swear I'm not building an anti tank missile out of 3d printed parts, arduino, tannerite, a metal funnel, and hobby rocket motors! No need to put me on any watchlists!_ very clever design for the seeker head tho!
The rocket knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the rocket from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the rocket is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the rocket must also know where it was. The rocket guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the rocket has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
I don't think the author of the video is in the US but for those who are curious, I am not a lawyer so take this with a grain of salt, but as far as I know, this kind of project is legal as long as (a) you don't put explosives on it and (b) you don't intend or attempt to use it as a weapon. In most US states, it would even be legal to make an anti-armor missile if you file the proper federal paperwork (NFA destructive device and explosives licensing) but there is a federal law specifically prohibiting guided surface to air missiles (but as far as I know, only if they are intended as weapons, which hitting a balloon is probably not)
We're making it onto the watchlist with this one boys!
Man I was thinking I'm now on a watchlist just cause it popped up in my feed 🤣
dude X on watchlist, tech videos, kittens, kittens, kittens, tech videos, homework... not a real threat, but look lovely kittens!
dude Y on watchlist, tech videos, the OTHER kind of youtube... lonely guy, one of our honey traps would have him singing like a bird in like 15 minutes, and then a two years trial for harrasment and a restraining order... not a threat-
dude Z on watchlist, tech videos, tech videos, tezzzzzz... yet more tech videos? thid dude has no time to do anything, he just watches tech videos! GET A F*N life looser
the other guy meanwhile finishes a degree in engineering by attending public libraries...
Lucky, I want to get my free watch too!
whats this about free watches ?
@@orsonincharge4879You have one now ;)
This missile DEFINITELY knows where it is and where it isn't.
It knows where it is because it knows where it isn't
I see you
Not again please 😂😂😂
@shrimpinpat [... by subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is, whichever is greater ...]
NCD leaking
Man. I'm not using my 3d printer to its full potential. Inspiring stuff here.
For real, i should try air to air missile
This man is a legend
I guess lol .make some water makers
If your where a real genius you wouldn't need a 3D printer
I mean, its prolly possible to print a time-machine, if you put the 1's and 0's in the right place...
This video is impressive since it is a very sleek guide on how to make a rocket with a 3d printer as well as being a tutorial on how to get on half a dozen countries watch lists.
@@alexd5469care to elaborate on this
And another half dozen country's payroll.
You're getting on everyone's watchlist, it's just that half a dozen will try to stop you.... The rest want to recruit you.
Any nation with kinda sorta industrial capacity can serial produce such rocket, launcher and program the guidance system.
The 2nd is on your side, let NO ONE harass you.
"You can't fight F16s with 3D printed guns."
*[3D prints a SAM]*
Just like the Founding Fathers intended.
The target is F22
@@haozi427 optical guidance has entered the chat
@@tek5358 You need to know the practical assignments in these schools.
I don't think these can reach that high or can do necessary manuvering without destroying its plastic casing.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365 definitely but a low flying apache? easy work
Congratulations! You made SEVERAL watch lists. Lol, great job. Highly sophisticated modeling. Took me down a notch. Or two.....
This designer probably joined a defense contractor with a big fat paycheck. Or has a round of "interviews" with numerous government TLAs coming up.
Pretty sure that just by watching this... we all made the list...lol
@@fallinginthed33p Not at all, they're millions of miles ahead of this kind of shit, and are in the backroom watching this video going, here's X,Y,Z problems with your design, and this is why I can go take lunch now.
The language in the slicer software is Chinese.
@@Mad_Catter_ That's not true, while this isn't G-hardened, it could be cheaply manufactured and mass-produced to counter drone-swarms...
Its so wholesome that guided missile systems have reached the consumer DIY level. How will this bode for society?
when everyone has their own personal targetting drone and a backpack of missiles, everyone will finally be safe from guns. I see things getting drastically safer because of this
You are sick.
Are you attacked by any body?
A reduction in home invasions.
It will bode well.
Finally!
My home defense was lacking anti-air
Actually my jaw dropped to this project. I felt the dedication and work to this rocket and its beyond awesome. It may not work properly because of the refresh rate of camera because it may not be enough for up to mach 0.4-0.6 speeds but man, engineering at that pieces really impressed me. I support your job and cant wait to see more!
This would likely shatter on launch (with a serious rocket motor, not a hobby motor)
Depends on the filament@@unoriginalname4321
@@unoriginalname4321 We've got people making 3d printed RPG's and the rockets for them as well(Legally too). You do have to make your own fuel though.
@@unoriginalname4321 Check the other videos on his channel, he's got test flights using his own rocket motor.
@@unoriginalname4321 Perhaps. Do keep in mind this is in its infancy.
This is some serious engineering. I wouldn’t be surprised if this guy is an actual missile designer
this could evolve to an infrared seeker air to air missile! keep up the good work!
I own an F16 (legal) with homemade air to air IR missiles for home defense (definitely not legal).
@KD-_- lets jusy say that if you had the money to buy an f-16 you'd have the money to buy some black market IR missiles
You could just use a drone (legal) and you would have the first homemade ucav (legal in some countries)
@@KD-_-yeah me too
See Conical scanning detailed on Wikipedia.
Have rocket spin. simple IR sensor to view off axis by a few degrees. And use a single pair of guidance vanes
Fantastic project, amazing work. Impressive engineering !
This is really good. Instead of staring array configuration you might consider mounting camera to brushless gimbal. And instead of conventional serial kinematic configuration, use a parallel kinematics. Then use the rate gyros to stabilize camera. You would need a decent dsp.
If you made something larger you could make an inertial platform using control moment gyros.
@@nadhirboukorsi7242 well this is why I said if it were larger.
Placing a stabilized gimbal would allow for better integration of signal on the seeker head. The motion of the target and maneuvering of the missile can blur the image. Missiles move incredibly fast, so do their targets. Placing it on a gimbal also allows for the missile to decouple its maneuvers with its field of view
@@nadhirboukorsi7242 well certainly if you’re talking about some kind of control algorithm. But he could get the gimbal stabilization stuff done even in flight.
I think a simpler solution would be to add convex lens for wider field of vision
@@justADeni it still wouldnt help with blurring.
Oh yeah... that's totally what I was gonna say... wanna use a gumball.
We literally went from DD's Liberator to 3D printing homebrew SAMs in 10 years.
I think just having this hanging on your wall occasionally every few hours doing a fin test would be awesome. The cradle arm on one of them would have the charge points built in. Rocket would have to metal rings like a head phone plug. So that no matter how you set it back down it would have power. Like a talking bass fish that randomly talk this missile/rocket would randomly fin move :) Ok now I have to see what the technical difference between rocket and missile are.
I think rockets are unguided
You dear sir are at least 50% of what I wanted to be when I grew up.
What a time to be alive. People printing air defense tech in their hobby rooms. Imagine telling that the engineers working on the first AIM9 Sidewinder. "Yo bro, in about 70 years from now people will just make these at home from off the shelves parts, coding the targeting algorithms from scraps scavanged from public resources".
Actually the first Sidewinder was made by a guy in his garage lol
@@killerkirbydudeat least partly with stolen funds of all thing
"coding the targeting algorithms from scraps scavanged from public resources"
did you mean: "asking a free to use artificial intelligence to write the code for them" :P
You have 3 voice messages:
1. Hammas call us back.
2. Boeing call us back.
3. FBI we'll be there shortly.
*houthies
1 they have the right to do anything they are under occupation for 76 years lol
as a certified engineer I say: This is one of the cleanest builds I have ever seen.
Bro, you literally made my dream come true, I am also involved in rocket modeling, and I can say that the most difficult thing in this rocket is stabilization, I’m interested in what kind of gyroscopes you use on the rocket
TH-cam in 2008: DIY oil change in car
TH-cam in 2023: DIY Surface-to-Air Missile
I have the Bambu Lab and all I'm printing is kid toys 🤣😂 while this guy building a SAM. Jokes aside great engineering work, much respect !
The fins are too large for the speed and will require a great deal of torque to move. You might be better served with a double delta canard fin system like the Israeli Python. It also gets the control mechanisms away from the motor. If you motor will only drive it to 400mph or less and it's pointed in the right direction it could work quite well. I know beam rider tech gets fancy fast.
I think it's a great project for a first attempt. You should look around the world at aero tech and how speed, & acceleration play important roles in design. Maybe a job at Raytheon is in your future!
You can get reduction gear assemblies or make them. I saw a later video that you missed your target after it went by, that's the controls not able to get enough action from the control surfaces. If you go to a front steer double canard you use smaller controls in parallel so you can get more action with the torque you have. Half the surface area on each rudder but having two parallel rudders doubles the torque available to each surface. Or go to a faster responding and larger servo motor. Also, a first stage high acceleration short burn motor would help you get up to speed faster and on to the sustainer motor.@@nadhirboukorsi7242
@@normangiven6436 he's a China norinco intern bro.
Once it's guided isn't it a missile? I've some doubts whether it'd withstand the forces exercised at flight. Are those digital servos? Aren't most missiles guided from the front control surfaces with rear ones really for stability? Overall it's a very interesting project, a cool mock missile, but if it can fly someday it'd also be a dangerous tool.
No front control surfaces have a positive feedback problem. Part of why the weight flyer was hard to control, and it’s why the euro fighter needs computerized control of its canards
Some newer missiles I’ve worked on use compressed air as well, same with newer aircraft
@@octoniumvideos Yeah, that's called Reactive Control Systems usually, and it's much more reliable than control surfaces since it's much less dependent on the airstream conditions. Just tiny gas thrusters using something like compressor bleed air are able to produce fine maneuvering control with response time and accuracy that surfaces could never hope to match.
Rear fins control is more stable for rockets and missiles. There is some aerodynamic problems (some type of turbulence) generated by moving canards that affects the stability generated by the rear fins and that affects the control system. Not always but it´s an issue. Cheers!
@@octoniumvideos Do you have any specific model of aircraft in mind? I'd love to research more about it
Man this is cool af. Ngl, I want the files. Not because I’d be able to make a functional copy (far from it, I’m not nearly smart enough with electronics unfortunately), but it just looks really cool and would be a dope prop to have laying around.
Edit: spelling
Yeah, Same! Just wanna print that and put it on display...
Yeah sure, a functional prop......
@@koolkiddie1. I've got plenty on model rockets already...
2. I build and display models. Cars, spaceships, planes, and yes a few rockets. Also a few movie props like the Blade Runner Decker pistol and the Fatman from Fallout.
3. I wouldn't be putting electronics in it. I don't have the programming skills for that.
@@DarthCrumbie you dont understand what I'm trying to say. A car without fuel in it is still a car. If those wings are movable with all the housing features inside the body, it's an active part
@@koolkiddie bro, this isn't like a car with no fuel. It's made of plastic.
Awesome video and great looking parts! Cant wait to see it in flight.
You think the turbulent flow caused by the servos disrupting the airflow will have a significant impact on the control of the rocket? I think it might introduce some very annoying speed dependent non-linearities.
No, they won't
I think the temperature of the rocket motor travelling through the innards of this “rocket” would have a far greater effect on the plastic parts this thing is made of.
I think the temperature of the rocket motor travelling through the innards of this “rocket” would have a far greater effect on the plastic parts this thing is made of.
@@gregmcnamara2563 Well Greg, unfortunately nobody gives two shits about what you think here
@@gregmcnamara2563I think you double posted
Cool design, Can you share the 3d print STL files? I just want to make a mockup.
Boom.
FBI! OPEN UP!
This guy is glowing brighter than a road flare at night
He's on a watchlist now
This is amazing. I've been fascinated with rockets all my life but haven't had time to devote to building anything. Looks like a fun project, good luck!
Got any files or prints for this? I'm especially interested in how you got the fins to articulate.
yoga
Huh
This is a very effective video to aid me in changing my vehicle oil. 😊 Thank you for this video.
awesome work! will you be applying a lens with a larger FOV?
Nice project, very well made!
All I want to see it hiting a red baloon towed by a drone.
My dude where the files at?
Very nice 3-d printing! I recommend a simpler level-plane aerospace system. 4 independently-controlled fins is not easily forming an aerodynamic plane. Instead form the plane to roll left and roll right, then an elevator prop for altitude adjustment. Hope it landed well!
Now this is engineering. Very nice.
I think it's worth making one low FPS camera to track the overall picture and one high FPS camera to accurately target the target.
It might be worth making several fixed low-speed cameras with low FPS and overlapping viewing areas.
Nice One !
Beware that this could get you in trouble with FAA (or dept of defence either one). guided flying stuff tends to raise some concerns.
Bro is chinese
No different from a drone!
@@ishtzavah can’t guide a rocket. Becomes a restricted weapon in the United States
@@42468does that only apply to missiles or is it specifically any kind of rocket propelled object?
I always dreamed about something like this for airsoft games. So cool to see people who can actually make these kinds of things a reality!
Do your airsoft games have helicopters that need taking down? Man, maybe I should get into airsoft.
This is such an amazing project. Keep it up.
I feel like this will be very valuable information in the not so distant future.
Just so y’all know civilian GPS units will shut off if you go above a certain speed and/or altitude.
Are you bringing that up to point out how people building missiles in their houses isn't a problem, because GPS will shut down? Or are you pointing out the reason a person would want visual guidance on their home-built rocket is because GPS is going to shut down on them, and they're going to need some other data to control navigation with?
@@mgmchenry I'm letting whoever use the information provided however they wish.
So what you're saying is you're better off guiding something that's got a drag chute....
First off, People in rocketry have figured this out long ago., secondly he's already making his own PCB hardware. making a gps receiver to work at those speeds is old hat. 3rd sure yes strap your car tom tom to a rocket it wont record the gps beacons for a number of reasons. This is some boomer urban legend BS. even Mythbusters was using consumer gps on thier rocket projects.. this myth keeps coming up.. it was old in 1980
@@octoniumvideoshow do we obtain a GPS that doesnt shut off at those speeds and altitudes
Huge milestone in the makerspace. Very nice.
Is that standard pla filament? Your prints are clean
This could also be applied to a direct manual control system like a TOW missile. Awe inspiring work brother.
The quality on those prints is amazing. Is this just because of the bamboo labs printer? what material is this? both?
Nobody knows.
Behind the scenes on PL-16 development! :O POGGERS!!!
It’s a beautiful and brilliant design but those control surfaces are moving WAY too much for a rocket. They need to only move a fraction of what you currently have or the rocket will be completely unstable in flight.
I agree.
Real missiles have that amount of control surface deflection and even more. There's a test of an AIM-9X rear fins and thrust vectoring unit in icing conditions on youtube showing just how much they move, looks like up to 50-70º against the airflow
@@Lemard77 Real missiles also have very advanced control systems to handle that amount of deflection. Does a hobby missile really need to make right angle turns at 200MPH?
@@Lemard77Real missiles also don't have plastic fins and linkages...
@@SuperheroArmorychannel The slower you are the higher control surface deflection you need as the dynamic pressure against the fins is lower.
THIS is so beautiful! Incredible work!
Link to the files, hardware, and software would be amazing. I wanna build one for my project!
I'm endlessly fascinated by the developments in insurgent warfare we've been seeing this century
This is amazing, but i dont think it should even be that complex. For Ukraine their main concern is Orlan-10 drones which really increased in numbers lately, and russians were able to synchronize them with artillery crews so as soon as Ukrainians move or do anything they get pounded with accurate artillery. Orlan is not a fast target, i think it moves at less than 200km/h and it generally circles the area or otherwise stays in the area, so if you manage 200-250km/h speed you can intercept it, i believe. I think something like a Multiplex FunJet or similar flying wing airframe with a hot 6s+ motor and battery setup can manage 200-250km/h, i think the hardest part would be creating a lightweight but effective warhead and detonation method, i'm surprised that Ukrainian (or russian) drone makers still didnt come up with something like that, it can even damage helicopters if it catches one on a head to head course
Taking notes while in Ukraine.
I don't think it's that smart to try and 3D print surface-to-air missiles for our warzone, what would be sick is strapping one to a decent UAV and launching air-to-air. Such missile can be much more compact since yes, it is only meant against slower targets, and it will get drone's speed added to the thrust of its engine, however there likely won't be GPS available and that's a problem
What the hell man! Now THIS is what 2024 looks like. :D Impressive!
*2023 :p
this is insane, really cool work!
So great this is a Chinese Channel. Seriously....look at the other videos!! They are in Chinese!
Damn... this is my music setlist AND my hobby too. Awesome video! I need to make one of these
The algorithm precision landed this video on your feed like.... well a missile.😂
@@25BDominique2021 🤣🚀
Mark Rober got contacted by the government for much less. Absolutely phenomenal work.
Very impressed! You managed to get 182k people on a CIA watchlist.
my guy is making a guide missile
How is he your guy!? 🤔 Did you hire him? 🤷🏼♂️
@@TheOpticalFreak nah, i captured him. Hes in my basement rn
Really cool project. Plans? Circuitry? Test is where things take a turn.
Please make one with aluminum.
do you give any courses or lectures ? at least source code for any work you finish it ?
Usually once u start guiding rockets, distributing source code might get u a visit from a few 3 letter agencys 😔. Mark Rober and Joe Barnard (BPS space) ran into this
With the current state of the world right now, I think it's worth it for us to be put on a watchlist, bois
Well, the people need to defend themselves from drones shooting tracer rounds in New Jersey.
What software are you using for design and what resources helped you learn to create rockets at the level you do?
I was just thinking that
Any ideas ?
great build, just heads up, lens can get dirty during flight, should make system for cleaning.
i wish this was open source or somewhere online.
How to end on a government watchlist 101. Still impressive work!
It’s crazy how people can design these weapons in there Homes.
Most weapons were originally designed by people in their homes. Nothing about this is particuarly complex.
Not the chemical compounds, so it’s basically a fast stick
@@conductingintomfoolery9163 Sugar and a couple other hardware store goodies are good enough.
I remember someone did a project like this many years ago. Almost pre-internet. An optically-guided model rocket. I searched for years to find it and never could. Always wondered what had become of the video...
Engineers when they gaduate university (They love money)
Очень круто! Наверное надо быстродействие поднимать типа 1000 кадров в секунду минимум.
У нас за такой проект даже в целях саморазвития можно тобой сильно заинтересуются люди "в штатском" )
В Китае тоже заинтересуются, только посадят не в кутузку, а в ОКБ, и бюджет дадут.
How can I study or learn this art of engineering? Where too ?
he is a phd candidate in National University of Defense Technology
@@notreally2227 thank you
@skyplanet9858 thank you , would you be more specific?
how about bachelors in mechanical engineering and masters in aerospace??i am interested in military drones , aircrafts@@skyplanet9858
Hello my friend I have amazing experiences can I exchange information with you leave me your number if you agree
Wow given the ever growing hostile and endless aggressive nature of that collective west it's about time this ends up in everyone's home for protection. Way to go guys.
You could save the lives of many unarmed women and children.
A lot people are hoping something similar can solve their combat drone problems.
Any chance you could be persuaded to put the CAD files online?
Very impressive. Can't wait for the balloon test.
By the way, what microprocessor are you using with the camera?
Kendryte K210 on Maix Bit board, you can read it in 4K
Now I want to start printing missile replicas, this is badass!
_raytheon wants to know your location_
get a geranium lens to filter all but IR, you would need a refrigeration system for it though; the colder the lens is, the less IR it emits.
Is he trying to make a self navigating ballistic missile, which will look for the red dot and set it as target😂😂
Since the camera is placed at the nose cone it looks like he is not trying to do propulsion based landing(slr) but parachute based landing on a precise location.
But you can always use a gps to get your location, and navigate accordingly so i am not getting why did he had make things complicated 😅
The camera is being used to locate a red balloon (as said in the description), so this is a surface to air missile rather than a ballistic one. The camera is necessary to detect and track the balloon’s relative position.
reading the description is a smart thing to do ^^ "Due to the limitations of the guidance camera's performance, this project adopts a staged guidance strategy. In the initial stage of the launch, the rocket will rely on an inertial navigation system (INS) and a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) for trajectory control. Once the target enters the effective recognition range of the camera, the system will automatically switch to vision-based terminal guidance."
@@lorenzcyber Thanks for reading the description for us lazy viewers. I went down the comments before checking the description.
"reading the description is a smart thing to do"
I might try that in the future myself.
Thanks again.
my bad, didnt read the description beforehand@@lorenzcyber
Should try recreate the Aim 9 Sidewinder targeting system. It’s super simple and effective if dialled in correctly.
can you share the files with us ?
Glowing so bright it's making me blind
@@Stellys-zm3ye ahh yes i'm a fed 1000%
Amazing, can't wait to see the final results.
I'm going to bet the final results are 15-20 with possible early release for good behaviour.
So if this works as designed...please adapt the logic to take down recon drones, do laser spot tracking, carry a 2 pound warhead and send all the plans, circuit designs etc to Ukraine. They really need cheap ground launched guided weapon capabilities. This seems like a mass production dream.
Unfortunately 3D printing is not very suitable for mass production. Unless the missile is resistant to electronic interference I wouldn't see any significant advantages over drones other than not requiring as much skill. Modified FPV drones can be relatively cheap (by military standards), and when flown by skilled operators can be very accurate. Drones are usually a lot more portable than rockets. The downsides of a drone is electronic interference.
Rather send it up ur @$$ missingdogmusic
Thank god the people who are smart and dedicated enough to make this aren’t terrorists
The only part that gets me to wonder is how a microprocessor can be that fast at image recognition, yet I am struggling to get a damn STT Model on my Raspberry PI running in a reasonable time
This is SoC. Dual-Core 64-Bit RISC-V. Kendryte K210 board.
Cool project!
Which printer do you use?
I see model rocketry has kicked up a few notches since I dabbled with them in the 80s.
great song choice. Fits super well for some reason.
ive been watching a lot of these types of videos lately...
_Why, no FBI agent, I swear I'm not building an anti tank missile out of 3d printed parts, arduino, tannerite, a metal funnel, and hobby rocket motors! No need to put me on any watchlists!_
very clever design for the seeker head tho!
What filament did you use? It looks great
I've been working on some similar things for a while, now we can be on watchlists together!
Nice SBC, knocked down the ARM, @2:00 at Maix Bit, kendryte K210 pushed to the limit FPS. Cool
That is what I call a final thesis project and not the useless blabla I've seen so many times.
watching this now with my printer next to my pc this is awesome
yooooo imagine having several of these bad boys hanging out in orbit 🥵🔥💯
Most excellent design and implementation..
Very nice. Your design is amazing.
Apart from the servo motors, it looks like a decent design.
The rocket knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the rocket from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the rocket is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the rocket must also know where it was.
The rocket guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the rocket has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
I don't think the author of the video is in the US but for those who are curious, I am not a lawyer so take this with a grain of salt, but as far as I know, this kind of project is legal as long as (a) you don't put explosives on it and (b) you don't intend or attempt to use it as a weapon. In most US states, it would even be legal to make an anti-armor missile if you file the proper federal paperwork (NFA destructive device and explosives licensing) but there is a federal law specifically prohibiting guided surface to air missiles (but as far as I know, only if they are intended as weapons, which hitting a balloon is probably not)
This is a missile. It has visual tracking and fin guidance system. It wouldn't be hard to add thermal imaging and tracking too.