The Tsar Bomba: Building the World's Biggest Nuke

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 พ.ค. 2021
  • I don't know, comrades. We built this nuke that can kill hundreds of thousands of people... I'm just not sure it's big enough.
    Simon's Social Media:
    Twitter: / simonwhistler
    Instagram: / simonwhistler
    Love content? Check out Simon's other TH-cam Channels:
    SideProjects: / @sideprojects
    Biographics: / @biographics
    Geographics: / @geographicstravel
    Casual Criminalist: / @thecasualcriminalist
    Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
    TopTenz: / toptenznet
    Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
    XPLRD: / @xplrd
    Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @JerryCrow
    @JerryCrow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +845

    You know the bomb is big, when the human lives of the operators are taken into consideration when calculating the cost of operation.

    • @gudmunduringigudmundsson9287
      @gudmunduringigudmundsson9287 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well.. when all they had to deliver it was that plane and ... I rather like to believe they did not .. ofcourse they did not want to kill .. humans.. pilots.. theyre pilots.. theyre publi... anyways... it would also over a drunken stoober be decided and accurately so that claiming truthfully it could have been twice as big but they didnt bother cause htey had common sense... would be much cooler. THAT WAS AN AWESOME BOOM AND IT KILLED NO,... human... directly at least. Cool explosion though.. horrifying enough to put an end to that madness. Thank the BOOM.. or as he so eloquently put it.. Dr. Strangelove, or how I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb.
      For science sake I recommend we build a series of them blowing up stuff on jupiter´s moon Io .. we could stress test bunkers in all kinds of scenarios. in case aliens invade ;))) .. ending up with the iggest detonated in our solar system to blow up a man made replica of the death star in 1/1 scale :)

    • @steeljawX
      @steeljawX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm not sure this is an absolute standard. I think the method of delivery is a big factor in the equation. Remember the "Davy Crockett" nuclear recoil-less rifle had the optimistic words along the lines of "users are probably safe, but should still take cover after firing" within its operating manual. Sure it's a big bomb, but is it really the size that's the issue or the fact that ordinance and delivery tech did not actually match up like they ought to have? I am also definitely not condoning that everyone should create better delivery methods for nuclear ordinance, I'm just pointing out sometimes it's the boom, sometimes it's the moron pulling the trigger.

    • @gudmunduringigudmundsson9287
      @gudmunduringigudmundsson9287 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@steeljawX I am sure that a cool hoopy frood that is pulling the trigger on a 1000 times faster and larger device in a preannounced public science experiment is a much much much better thing --- than a non hoopy frood pulling the trigger on anything bigger than firecracker.

    • @patrickscalia5088
      @patrickscalia5088 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Well at least the Soviets were able to accurately predict the yield and plan accordingly. The biggest US detonation, the Castle Bravo test was a huge fuckup that nearly got scientists killed and irradiated inhabitants of nearby islands as well as the crew of the ironically named "Lucky Dragon," a Japanese fishing vessel.
      You see somebody didn't properly do his homework, or fubared up the math, or both, and anyway hugely miscalculated the fusion potential of lithium deuteride, the primary fusion fuel of modern thermonuclear bombs. These brainiac scientists calculated the yield of Castle Bravo to be around 5 MT. Which is still a huge, apocalyptic explosion and even at that size would have been the most powerful man-made explosion the world had ever seen.
      Imagine the surprise and professional embarrassment when Castle Bravo detonated with FIFTEEN FUCKING MEGATONS instead of five. Observers on ships dozens of miles away talked about expecting to see an impressive explosion far away, when instead they felt like they were standing in the open door of a blast furnace and instead of having the mushroom cloud on the horizon, they had one so huge and so close it looked like, as they said "it had gone off in our laps." Instead of a far away vantage, they were so close that they actually fell under the umbrella of the mushroom cloud. A group of scientists who were monitoring the explosion in a "bombproof bunker" on the other end of the atoll, some 23 miles away, had to be emergency evacuated because the radioactivity falling on their shelter was skyrocketing to the point that it would have roasted every one of them alive, even in their so-called bombproof bunker if they'd remained much longer.
      I think you could call Castle Bravo the Biggest Fuckup in Human History. That's not to say it wasn't scientifically useful. Once the scientists learned just how little lithium deuteride you had to put in your secondary to create an apocalyptic explosion, US warheads began to get much smaller and far, far more powerful. In the days of bomber-borne gravity bombs and huge but dumb rockets, a megaton-plus warhead was on practically every weapon the US deployed in the 50s and early 60s.
      Without doubt Tsar Bomba was a smashing success in its assigned role, that of propaganda tool rather than a useful weapon. Which it was not. But it was never designed to be. Khrushchev was nothing if not brilliant and Tsar Bomba had the exact effect on the USA that it was planned to have.
      Honestly though, even a fleet of planes carrying a couple dozen Tsar Bombas wouldn't have even made it to Canada before every one of them was a smoking wreck on the ground. Too big and too slow and no match at all for NORAD interceptors and surface-to-air missiles. I doubt that more than a handful would have even made it much past the north pole.
      So now nobody but the Chinese are mounting megaton-range warheads on their missiles or in their strategic bombers (which is, save only stealth aircraft, an obsolete concept.) The only reason the Chinese use them is because their missiles are big and dumb and are only considered a deterrent. As in China has no capacity for a first strike to, say, destroy an enemy's missiles in the ground. What they do have is enough big dumb missiles to drop a megaton-plus warhead on every major city of any country in the world. When it comes to nuclear deterrence the Chinese are probably the smartest of us all. Their arsenal is all about punishment. Swift, unavoidable punishment on a huge scale. They don't need to be able to destroy an enemy's missiles in the ground so long as the enemy knows that ANY launch on China will result in smoking holes in the ground where enemy cities used to be.
      Nowadays between the US and Russia most strategic warheads run from about 100-800 KT in yield, just a pinch of the power of both Castle Bravo and Tsar Bomba. Does that make you feel safer? It shouldn't. Ten or fifteen 150 KT detonations in the right pattern over a city or other target is going to cause far, far more destruction than any single Tsar Bomba ever could. And that's EXACTLY how war plans on both the Russian and US side would work. Massive swarms of small warheads. According to the now-declassified SIOP plan of the USA for attacking the Soviet Union in the late 60s, the area of central Moscow where the Kremlin and other government agencies were located was slated to get 65 (!) goddamn warheads. That's not for all of Moscow. That was just for downtown. With plenty of others to flatten everything else. We have to assume that the USSR had similar plans for Washington DC and other important areas. Hell you could probably skateboard from North Carolina all the way to Philadelphia on the radioactive glass that would be all you'd see for hundreds of square miles after a Soviet or Russian attack. You'd drop dead from radiation in just a few hours, but it wouldn't be the skateboard's fault you couldn't skate the entire distance.
      Everything you need to know about how a nuclear attack would come about, and why. th-cam.com/video/u4Wb2p28tlY/w-d-xo.html. The most dread-inducing documentary you'll ever watch.
      And as a bonus, in that video you find out why the Moscow Metro would have been a mass grave in WW3 , instead of the sheltered underground world of the magnificent Metro series of PC games. As explained by a cold-war Soviet medical official, so you can't doubt the source.
      Hey Simon, how's that for a Megaproject? Do one on the declassified 1960s SIOP US war plans for attacking the USSR. Any plan that calls for detonating dozens or hundreds of thermonuclear warheads over a single city is as fucking MEGA as it gets.
      If he does it you know who to thank, folks.

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@patrickscalia5088 Wrong there. Castle Bravo went haywire because of an unknown property of the Lithium isotope used for most of the fusion fuel.
      It wasn't known until after the results of that test were analysed that the isotope making up the bulk of the Lithium in the Lithium-Deuteride fuel could initiate fusion, so that component was not taken into consideration when calculating the projected yield.
      The Soviets no doubts got their hands on that data (it may even have been in the open by the time) so they knew better what to expect.

  • @MrCTruck
    @MrCTruck 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1242

    "yeah we gotta cut the blast power in half because if we don't, pretty sure we're gonna blow up the atmosphere"- Russian scientists

    • @carso1500
      @carso1500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +139

      It was more like "we gotta cut the blast power in half or the pilot is not going to return"

    • @pbdye1607
      @pbdye1607 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      @@carso1500 Yeah, combined with the fact that they discovered the full-up 100 megaton yield would have been impossible to make *clean*, since it would've been impossible to keep the fireball from irradiating countless tons of debris, turning it into fallout, and thanks to the sheer yield and construction of the full yield's tamper, put a LOT of people in danger from high altitude, highly radioactive fallout. They also found out that 50 megatons was the "sweet spot" for high-yield detonations as anything more tended to lose more blast energy out into space, rather than where they wanted it.

    • @redram5150
      @redram5150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      When the Trinity test was going on, they were worried they’d ignite the ionosphere and burn the planet to a crisp.

    • @carso1500
      @carso1500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@redram5150 thats actually a myth, the scientists did discuss the posibility initially but after doing some mathematics they discovered they would need a REALLY Big bomb to do something like that

    • @pbdye1607
      @pbdye1607 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@carso1500 Even then, initial calculations suggest not even a large antimatter explosion could do this. You'd sooner create a crack in the mantle that'd arguably do just as much damage on a global scale. There was honestly more paranoia about the underwater shots than anything detonated intra-atmospherically - there's a video by the guy in charge of the first Bikini atoll tests where he deadpans into the camera that the tests won't vaporize the oceans and that he is "NOT an 'Atomic Playboy.'"

  • @k23turbo80
    @k23turbo80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +221

    "More power than all the munitions in WWII" , as a vet that puts this things power into perspective for me and it's kinda scary

    • @nicwilson89
      @nicwilson89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      10x more power than all the munitions in a 6 year war...and this was the bomb at half it's designed power. It's absolutely fucking terrifying haha

    • @kimskis
      @kimskis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      10 times more powerful mate...while still (thankfully) half reduced of it's potential yield lmao. Those russkies were totally insane allrite

    • @thegunslinger1363
      @thegunslinger1363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Imagine counting every bullet, missle, torpedo, artillery shell, and bomb. Fired during those 6 long years? Truly a terrifying scale of destruction.

    • @francoislacombe9071
      @francoislacombe9071 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      And that includes the two atomic bombs dropped on Japan.

    • @LucarioBoricua
      @LucarioBoricua 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@nicwilson89 And WWII was no average war, it was the pinnacle of madness involving human-on-human violence.

  • @TheCorpsehatch
    @TheCorpsehatch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +315

    The fact the scientists decided to lower the payload because they thought it was too powerful is insane.

    • @Stale_Mahoney
      @Stale_Mahoney 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      well when the fear of blowing the atmosphere of the planet, comes from someone it kind of defeats the purpose of protecting a country xD

    • @MrVacicak
      @MrVacicak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Stale_Mahoney no they reached the point of usefullness of the weaon, most of the blast of 100megaton one would escape to space, also it would create so much of radioactive debris it would bassically do more harm than use.

    • @Stale_Mahoney
      @Stale_Mahoney 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrVacicak guess you have not heard that they did actually fear for the atmosphere itself if it was to be the original chosen size?

    • @tomdecuca3627
      @tomdecuca3627 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Stale_Mahoney no the designer cut the yield because in order to attain another 50 megatons they would have to employ a uranium tamper of U238 to fast fission from the fusion. As such it was too much contamination. He also assumed over 500 hundred thousand people worldwide would die from the amount of fission used to ignite the weapon which was already over a megaton. There have been much bigger explosions than Tsar Bomba. Krakatoa was 200 megatons.

    • @robertpaulsen5114
      @robertpaulsen5114 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The next question is.... Just how many of them pushing for a full power test.... SHAT then selves, and suddenly decided that 50% is a DAMN good number after all?

  • @petrolhead4503
    @petrolhead4503 3 ปีที่แล้ว +883

    Imagine signing up as a photographer for the Russian Air Force because it was the safest assignment possible and then you pull this short straw

    • @jesusjozi1990
      @jesusjozi1990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      Go big or go to the Gulag

    • @USSAnimeNCC-
      @USSAnimeNCC- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That like being a politician and you have to be the security at your place

    • @achiltsompanos447
      @achiltsompanos447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Big or bust.

    • @isa-lp5rn
      @isa-lp5rn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What do you think american airforce was safeset job?

    • @florians9949
      @florians9949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The US: blowing up the atmosphere? Sounds like a good idea right?
      Ps: they actually tried to do something like this, I don’t know if it was beffore or after the Tsar Bomba but it was wnvuentually pulled off because someone so ewhere figueres out this was a dumb idea.

  • @notorioushkm97
    @notorioushkm97 3 ปีที่แล้ว +406

    You know the bomb was humongous when even the US said "I like big bombs that's too much"

    • @IggyStardust1967
      @IggyStardust1967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Am I the only one who sang that to "I like big butts but I cannot lie"....??
      "I like big bombs but that's too much".... yeah.... the beats match perfectly.

    • @kevinfreeman3098
      @kevinfreeman3098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You ain't never been to Texas...

    • @rusudanielflorinphotograph6940
      @rusudanielflorinphotograph6940 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They should bomb USA with 1000 like this ;)

    • @vonfaustien3957
      @vonfaustien3957 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The USA focused more on targeting and minturiazation. Why drop one bomb when a MIRV can carpet bomb several targets at once

    • @kevinfreeman3098
      @kevinfreeman3098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@vonfaustien3957 sure, that's what we did... Which is why there are only like four or so planes that are large enough to transport/deliver/service targets with our "standard" tactical nuke... You almost got it right, nice try though, thinking you're thinking of our intercontinental ballistics that have multiple reentry vehicles for target servicing. You've never heard of Texas huh, everything is bigger in Texas.

  • @tncorgi92
    @tncorgi92 3 ปีที่แล้ว +748

    It finally happened... ALL of the TH-cam recommendations on my screen are for Simon Whistler channels.

    • @liam3044
      @liam3044 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Simp

    • @coreytaylor447
      @coreytaylor447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      you have collected all 10 channels, now shave your head to claim the prize of becoming the head of the Simon cult

    • @Elliewright18
      @Elliewright18 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      You have a choice of videos to watch - Simon, Simon, Simon and Simon

    • @theBlankScroll
      @theBlankScroll 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      He favors you, the chosen one.

    • @Zeithri
      @Zeithri 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Someone's a Simonoholic here.
      Or maybe a Whistkie x)

  • @nts821
    @nts821 3 ปีที่แล้ว +267

    Tu 95 deserves its own episode.

    • @EtzEchad
      @EtzEchad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Agreed.

    • @1992AC
      @1992AC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Agreed! He did an episode on the B-52 a year ago, but it boggles my mind that he hasn't done an episode on it's rival, Da Bear! Between the B-52 and the TU-95, my favorite has to be the TU-95. I'm an American Aviation nerd and I'm proud to say that.

    • @atony1400
      @atony1400 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He do the B29 yet?

    • @patdohrety2940
      @patdohrety2940 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought I read it's the loudest aircraft in the world.

    • @EtzEchad
      @EtzEchad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@patdohrety2940
      It certainly is when it drops a 57 MT bomb...

  • @SparkBerry
    @SparkBerry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +183

    Castle Bravo would make a good follow up to this considering the literal fallout from that spectacularly awesome screwup!

    • @jameswhitehead6758
      @jameswhitehead6758 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      th-cam.com/video/WzAe7t_o0Mw/w-d-xo.html

    • @METAL1ON
      @METAL1ON 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I have been pestering him for ages to do Castle Bravo alas still no though.

    • @stefanschleps8758
      @stefanschleps8758 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They bungled this. They should have gone into detail about how long it took the Soviets to pool those resources together necessary to make the bomb. We know this part of the story. And they did Castle Bravo to death. lol

    • @METAL1ON
      @METAL1ON 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@stefanschleps8758 Tsar Bomba has been done to death but here we are watching another, besides I feel the CB one is more interesting in that it was a major goof and not just the testing of a big bomb.

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @E Van they know now, they didn't know at the time. We know now because of Castle Bravo

  • @dbrew2u
    @dbrew2u 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    It's said that the Russian Scientists watching the Tsar Bomba explosion were frightened that it would not stop . That fear also helped to end above ground Nuclear Testing .

  • @adrianfrift7571
    @adrianfrift7571 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    To quote skulker, "We attacked a few boats, they dropped the sun on us twice"

  • @WasabiSniffer
    @WasabiSniffer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    You know it’s bad when even the Russians put the brakes on it.
    “We could make it bigger.”
    “We SHOULD make it bigger!”
    *some math and a weapons test later
    “We should make it even bigger!”
    *lead scientist steps back
    “... we need to stop.”

    • @dzenacs2011
      @dzenacs2011 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even russians. Too bad americans was not russians when they start atomic war with Japan and kill thousands of children with atomic bombs. Should put a break on it

  • @ZippoX05
    @ZippoX05 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    One day Simon is going to have a mega projects video about how many TH-cam accounts he has

    • @davemcravedj
      @davemcravedj ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How the fuck does he find the time to do this

    • @mikaelbiilmann6826
      @mikaelbiilmann6826 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hmmm.. maybe they’re robots and androids… ever seen Simon and Simon at the same place at the same time…. Hmmmm…. 🤔

  • @ervinm.5065
    @ervinm.5065 3 ปีที่แล้ว +241

    Imagine an alien starship approaching Earth to visit humanity and seeing that
    Alien: "I can't wait to clap some human chee- HOLY SHIT"

    • @thegunslinger1363
      @thegunslinger1363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      To quote George Carlin. "And then we wonder why. A UFO doesn't just land and say hello."

    • @remo27
      @remo27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Actually, unless hyperspace or some other method that we (currently) don't think is scientifically possible exists to travel the vast interstellar distances, any ship going anywhere near the speed of light has to worry about shielding from even dust particles? Why? Because at speeds greater than roughly 50 percent of C dust particles act like gamma rays and even larger things (like a pebble) are basically nukes. So any interstellar ship will have to have SHIELDING of some kind and such shielding would largely make it immune to our puny nukes, as they would have traveled 100s of trillions or even quadrillions or more of miles to get here and had to be prepared to take a near constant bombardment of gamma rays and small nukes, esp when they were near or entered a solar system, ours or others.

    • @YeeSoest
      @YeeSoest 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@remo27 yeah but that's just like...your opinion, bro ;)
      No, you're right, if they got interstellar travel down, they're not shocked by a nuke. Their toddler's probably play with scarier stuff in our perception, they're totally different beings. More likely they'll rate us a "Stage 2 Civilization" with Ants at Stage 1 and we're probably not even able to grasp Stages 7 and above

    • @carso1500
      @carso1500 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@YeeSoest the tsar bomba liberated roughly the same amount of energy that hits the earth from the sun in a second, so for roughly one second suddenly energy spiked on earth and we reached kardashev 1 civ status to then fall down again to kardashev 0.7 or around that, the tsar bomba was a fucking monster

    • @auerbacher69
      @auerbacher69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "nope nope nope nope nope "
      *puts spaceship in reverse*

  • @Nefville
    @Nefville 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Andrei Sakharov is one of the greatest Soviets to ever live. He is like the 20th century equivalent of Alfred Nobel. Incredible person.

    • @comradecenturio2761
      @comradecenturio2761 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      He was one of the inventors of the Tokamak, the fusion reactor with the biggest potential.

  • @dernvader6876
    @dernvader6876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    You missed the reason for the change from 100mt... they figured anything beyond 50 mt. was a waste because the blast would be so big that it would just go into space...

  • @mols89
    @mols89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    What about a Geographics video on Krakatoa? That'd be neat!

  • @singular9
    @singular9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    USA: We make nuke.
    USSR: Hold my vodka.

  • @Theguy17513
    @Theguy17513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Do one on the BelAZ-75710 the largest dump truck ever

  • @joeylawn36111
    @joeylawn36111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    The first nuclear bomb detonation was not at Hiroshima, it was the Trinity test on July 16, 1945 in the New Mexico desert.

    • @colormedubious4747
      @colormedubious4747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@TheInfidel_SlavaUA Technically, that's a Fuel-Air Explosive weapon, not a nuke. The More You Know...

    • @alimohammad1934
      @alimohammad1934 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its not really a nuke

    • @JV-lq3tx
      @JV-lq3tx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@alimohammad1934 Little Boy and Fat Man weren't nuclear either. They were considered atomic.

    • @alankrebs856
      @alankrebs856 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I believe it happened before that... in Germany during WWII. It also explains where we got all the "material" for the 2 "B"'s used on Japan. The Germans had it before we did. No one, including us, knew about it.

    • @joeylawn36111
      @joeylawn36111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alankrebs856 I believe the German explosion you mentioned was a chemical one with the release of radioactive materials. The Trinity test was the first ever nuclear fission explosion.

  • @francoislacombe9071
    @francoislacombe9071 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    "The nuclear weapon's age began on the 6th of august 1945." Actually, it began on 16th july of the same year with the Trinity nuclear test of a plutonium bomb.

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Quite.

    • @musicman8270
      @musicman8270 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It didn't become a weapon until it was used.

  • @SovereignwindVODs
    @SovereignwindVODs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I was shocked and impressed when you mentioned the height of the mushroom cloud...and then you compared it to Everest. Holy fuck! My eyes nearly popped out of my head, that's insane!

  • @That_Thicc_Cat
    @That_Thicc_Cat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Hey could you guys please consider doing a video on the Pennsylvania T1? It was supposedly the fastest steam locomotive to ever exist and it took around 20 years of development

    • @bazzingabomb
      @bazzingabomb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      LNER Class A4 4468 Mallard at 126 mph still is the train to beat the record has stood since july 1938.

    • @That_Thicc_Cat
      @That_Thicc_Cat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bazzingabomb yes I’m aware, but the T1 could supposedly go over 140mph

    • @bazzingabomb
      @bazzingabomb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@That_Thicc_Cat yeah i know, but its supposedly 140mhp was only word and mouth. the fan club is building one now should be ready in 2030 at a cost of 10 million seems a high price to pay to take the record.

    • @That_Thicc_Cat
      @That_Thicc_Cat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bazzingabomb I agree with everything that you are saying and I love Mallard! But I just think the history of the T1 is rather interesting. Hence why I would like an in depth video on it

    • @bazzingabomb
      @bazzingabomb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@That_Thicc_Cat i agree it would make a great story keep your fingers crossed bud.

  • @benjaminlopez541
    @benjaminlopez541 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    At this point, Simon might as well make a channel and call it Cold War Projects. These cold war vids are sick

  • @leandrochavez6480
    @leandrochavez6480 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    "Has yet seen" Good phrase when we are 100 seconds to midnight

    • @stefanschleps8758
      @stefanschleps8758 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let us pray.

    • @jedaaa
      @jedaaa 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stefanschleps8758 I'm sure that'll be effective...

  • @indylockheart3082
    @indylockheart3082 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Im glad we live in the timeline where after this test the Americans and the Soviets were like...."ok yeah we should prob just stop there...that seemed a bit much" because you know the timeline where America responded with their own apocalypse bomb everybody's dead

    • @jamesaritchie1
      @jamesaritchie1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What makes you think anything stopped except the testing? You don't really believe research in how to make ever more powerful bombs that weighed a tenth as much, do you? America and Russia both tightened their security until neither side knew what the other was doing, and research is still ongoing after all these decades.
      Research split into two directions, higher yield bombs in smaller packages, and low yield bombs that could be used with artillery. One could even be fired from a mortar.
      No one who's talking knows how well the research went, but there is no doubt that the Czar bomd is the largest ever exploded, but nowhere near the most powerful ever built. The Czar bomb is ancient history. Modern science has made it little more than a toy.

    • @shaunoleary9774
      @shaunoleary9774 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Looking at the history of nuclear weapons development I disagree. After the colossal miscalculation with Castle Bravo and the Tsar Bomba I don't think anyone wanted something more powerful to be manufactured and stored inside their territory unless war was declared and they found it absolutely necessary to use as a last line of defense. Also, by the time these bombs were being developed it became apparent that such a massively huge and heavy bomb would be much harder to deploy successfully against an enemy far away than to build a multitude of ICBMs with smaller, less powerful, but much more effectively deployed nuclear warheads than trying to fly a slow, loud airplane over a vast distance to deliver on target.

  • @stephenlane9168
    @stephenlane9168 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Simon you should convince the TH-cam CEO to make you the international Chief Marketing Officer. Your channels keep me busy most days, the back catalogue has kept me going through UK lockdown. I’ve got your viewing numbers up 👌

  • @bradhobbs6196
    @bradhobbs6196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Simon has a crush on "Big Bombs", cause he knows we like that

    • @addisoneller1789
      @addisoneller1789 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      We like blowing things up :3

    • @FonicsSuck
      @FonicsSuck 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I like big bombs and I can not lie.

    • @thorzyan
      @thorzyan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      FonicsSuck damn you! Lol took my line 👍

    • @InflatablePlane
      @InflatablePlane 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He likes big bombs and he cannot lie.

  • @gitpicker9933
    @gitpicker9933 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Someone should create a video recreating this bombs detonation. To better show what it really was, these short glimpses of actual footage from outdated cameras jus doesn't do it justice. CGI or something to that effect of course lol

  • @jamesbodnarchuk3322
    @jamesbodnarchuk3322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Hello Dimitri. Well it seems one of our base commanders well he went a little funny in the head. He launched a bomber strike!

    • @jamesbodnarchuk3322
      @jamesbodnarchuk3322 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @HVAC Quality Assurance great sene

    • @danielmarshall4587
      @danielmarshall4587 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought I told you to take it easy, THERE'S NOTHING ANYONE CAN DO NOW.

    • @mattburnett4185
      @mattburnett4185 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gentlemen. You can't fight in here. This is the War Room

    • @johnconnor2572
      @johnconnor2572 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @HVAC Quality Assurance "Well, listen, how do you think I feel about it? Can you imagine how I feel about it, Dimitri? Why do you think I'm calling you? Just to say hello? Of course I like to speak to you. Of course I like to say hello. Not now, but any time, Dimitri. I'm just calling up to tell you something terrible has happened. It's a friendly call."

    • @isa-lp5rn
      @isa-lp5rn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnconnor2572 How you know his name is Dimitri?

  • @justme-ij2qy
    @justme-ij2qy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Perhaps a video on the U.S. electrical grid, which I believe started with the Pearl street station, would be a worthwhile venture.

  • @thorzyan
    @thorzyan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    I'm a simple man: i see tsar bomba and I click.
    Well-played👍

    • @allevant
      @allevant ปีที่แล้ว

      I see nuke and i click

    • @clearcreek69
      @clearcreek69 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know nuclear weapons have been lost in the USA but if this bomb was ever lost, you couldn't pay me all the money in the world to look for it

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    1:20 - Chapter 1 - The nuclear age emerges
    3:40 - Chapter 2 - The soviet nuclear program
    5:30 - Chapter 3 - A bomb to rule them all
    6:10 - Chapter 4 - The tsar bomba
    9:25 - Chapter 5 - The test
    12:05 - Chapter 6 - Fallout

  • @SEAZNDragon
    @SEAZNDragon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I think Simon mentioned the Tsar Bomba so many times in other videos I thought he already made a video about it.

  • @adorimable9690
    @adorimable9690 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Comrade Strangelove; How we learned to love our bomb

  • @JaguarBST
    @JaguarBST 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Imagine for some reason Soviet Union couldn’t develop nuclear weapons. Cold war would be a much different picture. Even with the power to wipe out humanity, nuclear deterrent did play a massively important role in avoiding wars in the scale of WWI & WWII.

  • @Robslondon
    @Robslondon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The ultimate ‘hold my beer’...

    • @ervinm.5065
      @ervinm.5065 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      *vodka

    • @Robslondon
      @Robslondon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ervinm.5065 Good point ;-)

    • @queenannsrevenge100
      @queenannsrevenge100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was more like:
      “Hold my b...DAAAAAAAAMN! OK, let’s back up for a second...”😳😳😳

  • @keepcalmyouexist358
    @keepcalmyouexist358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I wasn't scared when I saw this 9 months ago, but youbet your ass i am now.

  • @michaelhiggins7365
    @michaelhiggins7365 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was super interesting and I learned a great deal ! Please keep these types of videos coming.

  • @coffeeroaster99
    @coffeeroaster99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The nuc age startled in July 1945, in New Mexico,

    • @winwoodmayall
      @winwoodmayall 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd just wanted to write that, and started to browse comments to see if someone had already noticed the error.
      On July 16, to be precise...

    • @alankrebs856
      @alankrebs856 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Way before that if you look in German history.... we just didn't know it.

    • @winwoodmayall
      @winwoodmayall 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alankrebs856 Then we would have to establish what the phrase nuclear age means. Radioactivity was discovered several decades earlier, the word being coined by Maria and Pierre Curie back in 1898. British scientists made first artificial nuclear transmutations in 1920's and early '30s. Germans discovered nuclear fission in 1938.
      But in this video, I suppose the phrase was meant to be - detonation of the first nuclear bomb.

  • @mr.pavone9719
    @mr.pavone9719 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I remember feeling the shockwave from this and I was born 12 years after it was tested.

  • @Primedwhite
    @Primedwhite 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Interesting fact I heard, the Tsar at twice the yield wouldn't have been that much more effective. At 50ish megatons a lot of the blast blew out more of Earth's atmosphere into space. So a bigger blast wouldn't necessarily be that much more effective because it would simply be blowing out more air into space rather than having the air carry the blast wave onward. ... still scary as heck though!

  • @TheYacu
    @TheYacu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yay I was so hoping for Simon to cover this! Liked it before I even started watching it. ^_^

  • @Taurickk
    @Taurickk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey fact boy, have you heard of the Belgorod class of Russian subs? Commissioned in 2019 to do one thing only: Launch the bus-sized Poseidon class Intercontinental Nuclear Torpedo, these can be launched clear across the ocean at 70 knots to hit coastal targets. Original design was for a 100MT warhead with the goal of inundating the coastal city with a radioactive tsunami and render it uninhabitable for decades.
    The sub itself is big enough to carry 6 of these things, and also a whole other submarine docked to the underside.
    Sounds perfect for Megaprojects. Giant absurd russian vehicle + giant absurd russian doomsday device.

  • @markmh835
    @markmh835 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Is it my imagination, or is Simon's beard growing longer, darker and more luxurious? Surely there is some sort of beard product that could be a sponsor of Simon's videos. 😲

    • @MuffinMammoth
      @MuffinMammoth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He has his own brand of beard products. Called Beard Blaze if I remember correct.

  • @mateuszyko4412
    @mateuszyko4412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Simon, do a video on the Warsaw Uprising. It's somewhat a megaproject itself

  • @rustybell2722
    @rustybell2722 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for explaining events which I lived through but was too young to understand at the time.

  • @odinfromcentr2
    @odinfromcentr2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks be to God that the reaction in Washington was "Yeah, maybe we should, like, ease up a bit" instead of "We need something bigger."

  • @tylervanorman492
    @tylervanorman492 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I also "Like Big Bombs and Cannot Lie!!!" Simon is amazing.

    • @KendlickLama
      @KendlickLama 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s why you should get yourself some BeardBlaze! What s glorious beard he has (his own beard articals)

    • @FIRE_STORMFOX-3692
      @FIRE_STORMFOX-3692 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KendlickLama hahaha

  • @batlos
    @batlos 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The algorithm knows to push Cold War content after Oppenheimer’s release

    • @rogerwilco5918
      @rogerwilco5918 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because people are searching for it

  • @WhyneedanAlias
    @WhyneedanAlias 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The mushroom cloud reached well beyond the troposphere, the lower atmosphere where most of our weather events take place (probably had a height of around 15km or so) and trough the stratosphere which goes to aroung 50km and into the Mesosphere. The region where small meteorites burn up. It's height was 67km as he said in the video and for comparison space is defined as anything above 100km and the ISS orbits at around 400km. It reached 16% the height of the ISS!!

  • @suleimanbaba-ahmed91
    @suleimanbaba-ahmed91 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simon, you never get old,nice video bro

  • @JohnSweevo
    @JohnSweevo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "The Tsar Bomba: Building the World's Biggest Nuke"- Can you get the kit on Ebay, asking for a friend

    • @webserververse5749
      @webserververse5749 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes and no; I bought my kit last week but it was a cheap chinese knockoff; only blew up half the town. Useless. I would save your money

    • @TFCBarreto
      @TFCBarreto 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome guys to the NSA watch list.

    • @AppleReviews
      @AppleReviews 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes - but my eBay fees would be horrendous

    • @johnnywindsor183
      @johnnywindsor183 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TFCBarreto nsa watch list I love it 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

    • @JohnSweevo
      @JohnSweevo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@webserververse5749 Pity BBC kids programme Blue Peter wasn't a round. They would show you how to make one from sticky-backed-plastic and loo rolls

  • @victorzvyagintsev1325
    @victorzvyagintsev1325 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Few things
    1 - this was actually one of the "cleanest" nukes as far as fallout is concerned.
    2 - at 3:05 you are dead wrong. Soviets lost half a tank army trying to quickly take Warsaw(Battle of Radzymin). The tank army was decimated and was not in any shape to continue fighting. When you lose something like a tank army, you tend to take things slow for a while.

    • @Robertslawno
      @Robertslawno 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      1 Tsar bomba cleanest bomb omfg.2 No more lies about real history of WW2 You know that's the Soviets propaganda right? Soviets have still lots of man ( and tank power) they simply use this as excuse to not help the Armia Krajowa in Warsaw uprising.They waited for them to bleed out fighting the Nazis.

  • @scottyford4224
    @scottyford4224 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simon always great videos. Mega Project idea. First dreadnought ships.

  • @stevehardy7621
    @stevehardy7621 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Errors -
    When Hiroshima is mentioned, it shows footage from the bombing of Nagasaki.
    When the bomb dropped upon Nagasaki was mentioned, it showed footage from Hiroshima.
    Also I believe that he called the latter bomb "big man" or something. It was called "fat man".
    I've pointed out inaccuracies before on one of his videos, and I received a rather passive aggressive response that said "well thanks for pointing that out"
    What happened to humility??
    Dont get it twisted, I absolutely ADORE his content. But if I see something that's inaccurate or misleading, of course I'm going to stay something.

  • @Snowwie88
    @Snowwie88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nuclear weapons are good for one thing: Maintaining PEACE through deterrence (and Mutual Assured Destruction, aka "MAD").

    • @potita24
      @potita24 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Until the day a crazy man comes to power and decides to use one!

    • @burtb.8536
      @burtb.8536 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is only western thought. Every citizen of Moscow knows exactly what to do in a limited strike situation !

  • @sundoga4961
    @sundoga4961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Americans: Our biggest bomb was designed to have half that yield.
    Russians: Our biggest bomb was designed to have TWICE that yield!

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah, and be three times the size of yours too even at half its design yield

    • @dale116dot7
      @dale116dot7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why so wasteful of a big bomb? It wastes most of its yield to look big instead of performing architectural renovation. Because it is better to aim a bunch of smaller ones more accurately and they can fit on a SLBM.

  • @PantheraOnca60
    @PantheraOnca60 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great opening: "Some bombs are simply too big." 🤣

  • @TracyA123
    @TracyA123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! I knew of this bomb test but never knew how big it actually was. That's insane

  • @Extremeredfox
    @Extremeredfox 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I wouldn't at all be surprised if the US and Russia have the full powered version of this bomb, just sitting somewhere, waiting to be used.

    • @thomasshepard6030
      @thomasshepard6030 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The modern bombs America have are far more destructive than that old Russian bomb

    • @RJALEXANDER777
      @RJALEXANDER777 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Honestly they probably don't. The simple matter is that the larger a blast the less efficient it is. It's better to use cluster munitions that can target multiple targets simultaneously. The bombs used in the 40's could wipe out cities, bigger than that was already seeing diminishing returns.

  • @codyhoward7640
    @codyhoward7640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Good god, I knew the Tsar Bomba was big, but I didn't know it was THAT big. O_O

  • @chrisyanover1777
    @chrisyanover1777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am really glad you did the Tsar Bomba for Megaprojects. I thought you wouldn't do it since you did a Geographics on Novaya Zemlya

  • @paulmaher7683
    @paulmaher7683 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    6:06 pretty sure this is half the back sound from the original Quake game.

  • @adamlomas8479
    @adamlomas8479 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Now I become death, the destroyer of worlds.

  • @joesantos2455
    @joesantos2455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I caught YOU SIMON! You referenced this video in the past but it DID NOT EXIST UNTIL NOW!! Ya suspect Whistler!

  • @jbgraham4041
    @jbgraham4041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Possible Cold War annihilation always seems more interesting and humorous when Simon gives you his take on it. Continue doing what you do and I'll keep watching it.

  • @jalendeason906
    @jalendeason906 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you know the bomb is big when the soviet union cares about the pilots

  • @tropicalshadow3817
    @tropicalshadow3817 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh how this is so relevant

  • @benhewitt4293
    @benhewitt4293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "No mouse would ever create the mousetrap"

  • @arzen9835
    @arzen9835 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Проект "Посейдон": просто здравствуй, просто как дела...
    (Project "Poseidon": hello there...)

  • @ShadowCammando24
    @ShadowCammando24 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The bombs blast was so catastrophically powerful it blew out windows as far as Sweden when it went off.

  • @glengearhart5298
    @glengearhart5298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I thank God that we have mostly pulled away from the nuclear war mindset. Being a realist, I know that nuclear is always a threat, but nothing near like it was when I served in the Army.

    • @shrimpflea
      @shrimpflea 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hold that thought

  • @xpusostomos
    @xpusostomos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The nuclear age didn't begin with Hiroshima, it began in the New Mexico desert with the first nuclear explosion.

    • @shrimpflea
      @shrimpflea 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True but I think he meant nuclear war.

  • @ABaumstumpf
    @ABaumstumpf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also very interesting:
    The full 3stage designed would likely have been had way higher than its intended yield as the material used as foam initially used for keeping the 3rd layer at a distance was later theorised and shown to be able to increase the yield of the inner stages by slowing down the expansion as well as acting as a moderatot increasing the yield of the 3rd stage. As most information about the exact construction and workings of nuclear weapons are still secrets heavily guarded by the respective governments there are only rough estimates about just how large the effect would be. Some sources say it would be just as low as a 20% increase, others go as high as suggesting 3x increase.

  • @pmgn8444
    @pmgn8444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well, this time Simon & Co get the visual right and the text wrong. Quantity over quality!
    1:53 - Simon says "Big Man". No. As the visual shows, the correct name is "Fat Man".

  • @eskanderx1027
    @eskanderx1027 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    3:25 Yet he never ordered to drop a nuclear bomb on a city.

  • @x_hibernia
    @x_hibernia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I heard that the reason the bomb was scaled down was because they didn't want to accidentally set the atmosphere a blaze

    • @remo27
      @remo27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wrong. The people who created the first ATOMIC (not thermonuclear aka hydrogen) bombs worried about that, there was some very small chance based on their calculation that the Trinity Test (first nuclear test ever) might do that due to some chain reaction in the air, but it never happened. By the time this bomb rolled around 10 to 15 years later, it was known that nukes, no matter how large, don't 'set the atmosphere on fire'. This was due not just to all the hundreds of tests that both superpowers had done by that time, but also the fact that digital computers h ad not only been invented but their were far more of them and they could handle all the theoretical calculations faster and better and more accurate than humans could. What the Soviets didn't want was trouble with their neighbors. This island was a test island (where they exploded the Tsar Bomba) but even so the shockwave was felt (and shattered windows) in places like Norway and Sweden. A twice as powerful bomb might have caused considerably more damage plus they didn't want to risk fallout all over Europe which might lead to war or , at best, embarrassment.

    • @alankrebs856
      @alankrebs856 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh poo! What's a little atmospheric FIRE!!!! It's all in the name of "fun"!!! :))) I don't know what I like more.... Tesla Resonance Oscillators.... or cracking Hydrogen from ordinary tap water! Da bigga da boom da betta!

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@remo27 that, and they didn't really need to do the full scale blast to test if the thing worked.
      The effects of using a Uranium tamper instead of a steel tamper were not that hard to calculate, and didn't affect the overall design, so using a steel tamper was both more safe, cheaper, and enough for the purpose of the test.

  • @comradeiosif2794
    @comradeiosif2794 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great vid Simon! The world's largest nuclear bomb, perhaps you could do the USAF's largest nuclear bomber the B-36 Peacemaker.

  • @TheWuffball
    @TheWuffball 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    9:57 The white paint would have been to repel the heat

  • @iVardensphere
    @iVardensphere 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Tzar Bomb: Basically my wife but in the USSR

    • @TheGranicd
      @TheGranicd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So you had 50/50 to survive eh?

  • @Real28
    @Real28 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I see Cold War video about Tsar Bomba, I click.

  • @peterg.8245
    @peterg.8245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 114Mt. predicted yield how much atmosphere would be blasted into space? Tectonic shifts? These are somethings we never need to verify.

  • @jve89
    @jve89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Maybe you should do a complete video on Julius and Ethel Rosenberg! Would be very interesting!

  • @OMGtheEbolaVirus
    @OMGtheEbolaVirus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Megaprojects suggestion: Buran-Energia.

  • @RaderizDorret
    @RaderizDorret 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    One thing Simon forgot to mention. When the Tsar Bomba was dropped, it was in the middle of a mutually agreed upon moratorium on nuclear testing so both the Soviets and the US could negotiate arms limitations. The Soviets gleefully ignored the moratorium inside a year and thus proved the worth of their word. This escalated the Cold War by proving the Soviets, at best, were not negotiating in good faith as they used Castle Bravo to browbeat the West into agreeing to stop testing while they were cheerfully developing a beast like this.

  • @jeffagain7516
    @jeffagain7516 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any folks as fascinated by the history of nukes as I am, should look into purchasing two dvds that I believe are still available; "Trinity and Beyond" and "The Atomic Cafe".
    Shatner narrates the 1st one and both are incredibly good, straight simple facts, no judgemental drama attached. Excellent documentaries that are highly recommended.
    Oh, and of course, thanks again Simon.

  • @aleksanderpopov5060
    @aleksanderpopov5060 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    really great video, thank you

  • @nielslund5959
    @nielslund5959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is a reminder of what humans can do but shouldn't.

  • @danielladwein2570
    @danielladwein2570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The bomb just dropped. Lets gooooo!!!

  • @johnnydoe7846
    @johnnydoe7846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Scientists: we should probably not make thing 100 Megatons... let’s do 50.
    Flight Crew: THANK YOU!!!!

  • @19RaxR91
    @19RaxR91 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "We've never seen anything like the Tsar Bomba since, and always remember - it was supposed to be twice as big!"
    Is that a challenge meant towards some crazy billionaire to make Atomic Bombs Great again?

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      nah, the Russian military has already done that. They're fielding 2 weapons systems with 100MT warheads, nuclear propulsion, and fully autonomous navigation systems.
      Set a target, a desired date to hit it up to several months in the future, press the button, and it will fly around for a while before looking for the best way to get there undetected and blow up a city.
      The Americans with their SLAM project in the 1950s weren't anywhere near that crazy, and they canceled theirs because it was too crazy.

    • @ryanchowdhary965
      @ryanchowdhary965 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jwenting posidon torpedoes

    • @toddsimpson2141
      @toddsimpson2141 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seriously ? T.D.S much

  • @dreamcast649
    @dreamcast649 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Woah this is the earliest i’ve been on a video

    • @MK-tt5xy
      @MK-tt5xy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well done

    • @spirevr8907
      @spirevr8907 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      for me I've been 6 seconds early

    • @arshias4532
      @arshias4532 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      7 minutes

    • @howhigh0521
      @howhigh0521 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re grounded go to your room.

  • @destinytroll1374
    @destinytroll1374 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    13:08 Poseidon torpedo has entered the chat

  • @ericheaton642
    @ericheaton642 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Harry Truman: “There’s no way the Soviets have the ability to make nuclear weapons”
    The Soviets: *Makes Tsar Bomba*

  • @LarsaXL
    @LarsaXL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hello and welcome to another episode of The Soviet Union Makes Exactly The Same Thing Only A Bit Bigger...

  • @MAGGOT_VOMIT
    @MAGGOT_VOMIT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Even with a Tsar Bomba.....the frozen Burritos will still be "icicle" in the middle. 🤣🤣🤣

  • @christopherleubner6633
    @christopherleubner6633 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you see the video that the Russians made on it, you can see the innards of this device. It had 6 roughly 9Mt thermonuclear subassemblies in it. There was supposed to be a tertiary stage in the center that was gonna make it even more powerful. Had they added that piece, the yield would have been between 120 and 250Mt of blast. In practice though, once they yield is roughly 22Mt, the excess power is wasted because the crater more or less reflects the energy straight up.

  • @mikehunt7888
    @mikehunt7888 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You could detonate a nuke inside this guys fabulous beard and never know an explosion occurred.

  • @zinussan50
    @zinussan50 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pilot: what are we carrying?
    Soviet: 😤nothing to worry, just fly to location & drop it. Fly away as fast as you can and hopefully you guys survive 😌