3:1 Up Haul or Z Rig

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @damonbrown2494
    @damonbrown2494 ปีที่แล้ว

    For those unclear this is just a haul rig meant to be attached using those prussiks to a haul line on another system. The progress capture for the load would be done with the other system.

  • @jrstrange123
    @jrstrange123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Oh good lord the negative comments! It's not an advanced learning video! It's a short simple picture of the basics of a z-rig!!!

  • @frostgfx
    @frostgfx 13 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    FYI... would be helpful to show attaching prusiks to the system.... otherwise great method to set up small.
    J Frost - MA

  • @dyoonu
    @dyoonu 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    34 years of climbing/rescue but still learning.
    Need at least one prusik at the anchor to secure load strand during the raise !
    Double pulley at top allows haul team to spread out across fall line rather than bunch up at cliff edge.
    Highly recommend a Radium Release Hitch between anchor and top pulley in case rig jams or malfunctions, etc.
    Also, back off a quarter turn when locking carabiners.
    Second the "different" comment and endorse the aluminum carabiner comment.

    • @janiga74
      @janiga74 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A lot of good points. One thing, this setup is off of the main line, so the progress capture would be on that main line. So there should be no need for progress capturing in the 3 to 1 itself. Also, probably wouldn't need a load release because of where the progress is captured you should be able to slack this system enough to fix any problems. Just my thoughts.

  • @SignedSign
    @SignedSign 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what about the progress saver prusik?

  • @LifeByIan
    @LifeByIan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good video, thank you. I'm trying to learn too set up a small simple 3 to 1 pulley that can attach to the ceiling to a eye hook or to a wall that has a fence on it. The purpose is to recline m wheelchair and with my arms use the pulley to move my legs up and down to get some movement and range of motion. I have tried this with a regular exercise pulley and it does work but 3 to 1 would be more sufficient. Is there a read made 3 to 1 that you can recommend that I could purchase? Thank you for your help.

  • @Deerector
    @Deerector 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    How come the prusik isn't by the anchor to prevent the rope from slipping back? This looks incorrect but I'm no expert..... any help guys?

  • @buckched62
    @buckched62 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i like how you set up the system but where is your safety, prusiks as breaks. you used prusik minding pulleys as breaks why not put a safety in it?

  • @200JLH
    @200JLH 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rather different from what I was taught, but looks like you guys have different SOG's. Interesting and honestly a rather confusing set-up. Not my preferred systen, but I'm sure it will work. Personal fan of having them simple enough that they don't take large amounts of time to set-up but enough hardware to make it safe. Last thing some people have a big thing about using only steel on steel hardware, in other words what appeared to be your aluminum pulleys should aluminum 'biners not steel

  • @MoabYoda
    @MoabYoda 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A double pulley on the anchor would not be better. Using a double pulley on the anchor side would only be useful if you wanted to change the direction of pull for the the haul team. Fixed pulleys create direction change only, for a pulley to create mechanical advantage it must be a moving pulley. If you added another pulley to the load side it would increase the mechanical advantage and it would no longer be a 3:1 but likely a 5:1.

  • @TheLoobis
    @TheLoobis 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What the hell is that noise?

  • @med358
    @med358 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am just a novice but doesn't the fact that the bottom pulley and the end of the rope are both attached to D ring which is then attached to the load eliminate the need for a separate rope grab?

  • @BigSed176
    @BigSed176 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    no progress capture device?

  • @ernoklemetti5942
    @ernoklemetti5942 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mkay

  • @robbysamosir6113
    @robbysamosir6113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    oke up sir 🙏

  • @deanadams2966
    @deanadams2966 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That's a figure 9 mate not 8

  • @BoboAthanassion
    @BoboAthanassion 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It doesn't look safe at all. Where's your safeties if the load should fail? I don't see any Munter Knots. You didn't rig up the prusik up properly to act as a break.

    • @KoruptStatusX
      @KoruptStatusX 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +John Athanassion
      1. Its a munter hitch. Not a knot. and it has no place in a haul system, only a belay system and even there its a poor choice
      2. This system appears to be set up as a piggyback system to the haul line so it does not require a safety (prussik). The main line will have that. If your using this to haul on its own then absolutely you need it.

  • @whataboutredlorry
    @whataboutredlorry 12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why use the prussiks to attach to the load? Prussiks are the weakest link in that entire system. Lowest breaking strength. We used prussiks as breaks.

  • @Deerector
    @Deerector 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mmkay

  • @Eduard482
    @Eduard482 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    mmkay

  • @Rob-hx6on
    @Rob-hx6on 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    should be set up with a rig or stop, otherwise personnel become part of the system & cannot walk away to assist elsewhere. no offense I hope

  • @ryansutherland4632
    @ryansutherland4632 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Its just a basic 3:1 and not an actual Z RIG,.......
    wheres positive capture? but ok lmao

    • @Bushcat67
      @Bushcat67 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mr Mackey has been found 🤣

  • @TennesseeArborist
    @TennesseeArborist 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A safety knot on a figure-eight is about the most pointless redundancy I've ever seen. NOT required by most AHJs in Rope Access and in the Fire Service. Not sure why you and a lot of others do that. It doesn't make any sense.

    • @lukewhitworth472
      @lukewhitworth472 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have been taught to tie it for good practice in an all out emergency (night decent and no torch). With the knot if you re-threaded the figure of eight wrong it is still less likely to fail. However, if you are confident you can tie a double figure of eight and you have a carabiner then it is pointless

  • @Cafeducati
    @Cafeducati 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not helpful. No conclusion and I simply could not help but be distracted by the 1,307 "okays" used over the duration. Plz take a public speaking course. It will help.

    • @jamesbb716
      @jamesbb716 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Cafeducati Perhaps you should make a video

    • @biologyprevails
      @biologyprevails 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Cafeducati He doesn't even say okay a lot. Anyways what's important is the information. Seems like you're projecting some frustration.