Acustica Audio NEBULA 4 - is it really SCARY DIFFICULT to use?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 76

  • @FoliaSound
    @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Heeey! What do you think about Nebula 4? Tried it or still afraid to touch it?: Lemme know down below, thanks!

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      Plus: this vid is NOT sponsored by Acustica, they don't even know I made it. I'll probably send it to them anyway :)

    • @Gilwtt
      @Gilwtt ปีที่แล้ว

      Love this bad guy !!

    • @tryingtotryistrying
      @tryingtotryistrying ปีที่แล้ว

      acustica the company blows, some of the worst customer service I've ever encountered. the nebula tech is mostly great, minus Acustica. buy third party. sounds better supports better people.
      ps if you have a stereo input you want to add harmonics it's more accurate to make two instances and run them dual mono. the env follower on nebula is mono so any stereo signal is possibly having unnecessary IMD added, cause Acustica. so if you had a drum bus with a shaker panned hard left that shaker is also effecting the right channel as far as the harmonics being generated. which is the cool thing about nebula, so a total pain but it's worth it. congrats on your 400 euro program with no lfo or stereo capability!
      acustica just has a piss poor attitude for someone selling a "premium" product. azzimov the skin maker+3rd party have more passion and great sounding results than the actual company, it's not even a question or a claim- a cold hard fact backed up by 1300 pages of gearspace forum.

    • @tryingtotryistrying
      @tryingtotryistrying ปีที่แล้ว +1

      btw I own every single timp library, almost all Cupwise, working on alexb GE edition (not ge edition mehhhhh) stuff too. like his 609 is great. I just finished doing all those with custom skins last night on a new hd.
      and to be clear, maybe- let's say with the SSL g you want to put it on the mix bus. if you have one instance of each (comp+pre) the compressor is reading the mid/mono signal for GR and applying the harmonics to mid and sides. if it was one compressor then two pres, one left one right then compressor is reacting to the mid signal for GR but the pres are getting the accurate harmonic info. and two comp and two pres split would be dual mono vs stereo. so basically you always want to split anything adding saturation to the sides into an additional two instances to avoid cross "contamination"

    • @EMERALDLIONSOUND
      @EMERALDLIONSOUND ปีที่แล้ว

      Seems great! I do want to get into these. Do I need to purchase N4 before purchasing libraries? I find it difficult to see how much it costs online!

  • @pacman_pol_pl_polska
    @pacman_pol_pl_polska ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Acustica is like going to a studio. Jump in, tweak some knobs, export tracks and close the CPU intensive session.
    Then enjoy it "at home" with other "normal" plugins.
    Worth it.

    • @davidperez909
      @davidperez909 ปีที่แล้ว

      I let it render and go to sleep. Fantastic sound.

    • @NoPostal
      @NoPostal ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL So true.

    • @christiannilsen2835
      @christiannilsen2835 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Word! haha. I wonder how efficient they've made the plugins from 4-5 years ago i used them last time :)

  • @tryingtotryistrying
    @tryingtotryistrying ปีที่แล้ว +7

    to any nebula owners who are not patreons of Azzimov- CHANGE THAT IMMEDIATELY AND YOURE WELCOME. azzimov is a ukrainian dude who makes skins for 3rd party nebula libraries, its like 3 bucks a month and theyre as good looking as any big company imo, better a lot of the time. but not only that they often add a LARGE amount of functionality by being able to swap out different ratios etc.
    no good reason to not support him and also upgrade your workflow. and hes got a page on tutorials for setups and is just a super nice guy. 3 bucks

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      I totally didn't mention Azzimov... I'll make a post about it tomorrow, thanks for reminding!

    • @Kayford1979
      @Kayford1979 ปีที่แล้ว

      Got to it before I could mention it..yep after finding out about that dudes skins Now most of my 3rd party nebula skins are just like using a standard plugin!

  • @eprotz
    @eprotz ปีที่แล้ว +7

    TimP compressors are really good, but to get the whole package and sound don't forget to use with the pre instance. I was using just the la2a comp until a college point that to me and the sound gets to the fullest. This pres most of the times go after the comp.

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure thing, thanks for s tip!

    • @Mooveism
      @Mooveism ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you create a setup with both the compressor and preamp engaged?

  • @jimslominski8006
    @jimslominski8006 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've just recently gotten into Acustica Audio myself, and I just love it! I record predominantly acoustic jazz, folk, and pop music, and I can't believe how amazing the convolution technology sounds on tracks, particularly on my upright bass, which has always been a struggle to get to sound rich and woody. The Acustica plugins make it sound like the music is coming from right inside the instrument - very sonorous and resonant. It's a total game changer. I'm using more vintage-y types like Tulip, El Rey, and Taupe, which fit my genre perfectly. I'm totally blown away on the night and day difference from my previous process. It's both a joy, and now very quick to dial in the sounds i want. I did venture into Nebula a few months ago. I didn't find it too difficult to set up, and it did sound great, but the work flow with the different setups and different parts and bits that needed to be assembled into chains was a bit cumbersome for me. I felt a bit lost in the weeds. For a bedroom/kitchen recording guy like myself, it was a bit too much of a process for the limited time in the day that I have. I did like the sound though. And now with your video that makes me think I should give it another look. You have laid it out very simply here, in a way that the other videos out there haven't. I appreciate that you've taken the time to do that for us. Cheers from Canada!

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Really nice to hear that. Cheers to Canada!

  • @jriron1
    @jriron1 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love N4.. I've being using since the release... btw.. Tim Petherick makes great stuff!

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh yes, he does :)

  • @christiannilsen2835
    @christiannilsen2835 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree. I own LOTS of UAD plugins and gear and this companies solutions are on another level..

  • @StellarWorks2023
    @StellarWorks2023 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great stuff man. Yes, it is a bit more work to install Nebula libraries, but absolutely worth it. Creating and fine-tuning setups is a labour of love though ...

  • @eranddroory9987
    @eranddroory9987 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sounds more like the release curves are different to me! Thanks for the video.. 🙂

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds also like different attack, better retaining transients in TimP library!

  • @Gilwtt
    @Gilwtt ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tim Petherick bus compressor is actually the best I tried.. and I did try a LOT :-) and btw that's kinda wierd and funny... we''re not a lot to use it ;-)

  • @fredtimothy940
    @fredtimothy940 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I highly appreciate your acknowledgment of the SCARINESS of Nebula 4. and Yes, it is truly scary!

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      So good I found people who are also SCARED by Nebula xD Cheers!

  • @diegopereze98
    @diegopereze98 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It was missing to place the Preamp section after the compressor in TimP's SSL, that's where the saturation and harmonics are produced. It would have been fairer and the difference would be even more noticeable, but excellent video anyway. I love nebula and I don't know why they haven't focused on perfecting this system and unifying everything.and of course with today's technology it could be easier to create new 3rd party profiles and without consuming so many resources. it's unbelievable that this technology is over 10 years old and there have been no big changes

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep, I forgot the preamp, sure :( It really shines with the preamp. I think that there are not too many ways of optimizing convolutiuon - it will never be really CPU light, our only hope is more and more computing power in new PCs :) Cheers!

  • @davidperez909
    @davidperez909 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Got a ton of Acquas and I am so glad I got into Nebula.

  • @dazza1000
    @dazza1000 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the video Paul. : ) Installing N4 and my associated purchases was a nightmare for me. I had one word running through my mind the entire time - WHY? WHY? WHY? WHY? lol Kind regards, Darren (Wales, UK)

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey, Dan! Hope my vid will help you a bit to be a little less scared of Nebula ;)

  • @spidif2544
    @spidif2544 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Petherick RCA ba-6a is a true wonder.

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haven't tried it yet, thanks!

  • @kipcasey8736
    @kipcasey8736 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Paul, can you show us how you would create an EQ chain inside Nebula? Also would be interesting to hear your opinion on some Tim P and AlexB EQs

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      Not a bad idea at all, thanks!

  • @TheGeneticsOfRock
    @TheGeneticsOfRock ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the excellent Nebula video. I have a lot of Acustica Audio plugins and Nebula too. I really like their analogue and distinctive sound, and evaluate their qualities in the Plugin Doctor. I use mostly Aqua plugins (I love how they look and they are easy to use) but this video is a great motivation to explore my Nebula libraries. I only have the Acustica's libraries. Could you share which non-Acustica libraries you prefer the most? I would appreciate it greatly. I really like your channel, and value your time and experienced opinions. Have a good day.

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks a lot, that's great to hear. A vid about my Nebula libraries would be a great shot, I'll make ot happen one day!

    • @SoundSignals
      @SoundSignals ปีที่แล้ว

      Literally anything by Tim Petherick

  • @Piotre
    @Piotre ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the very interesting and useful video!
    Since you've switched to using AA plugins, I'm very curious to see what specs your computer has. How many of what AA plugins or N4 libraries are you able to run at once in a medium mix, and what buffer size do you need to use for ASIO?

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Buffer when mixing with Nebula - always 1024. CPU: Ryzen 5900X, 64 GB fastest RAM, ultra .m2 drives!

    • @Piotre
      @Piotre ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FoliaSound Thank you! How about using multiple instances at once? I mean many... Such as channel strips for example. Is it possible in such PC configuration without any issues?

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Piotre well, you'll need a real powerhouse, that's for sure. AA stuff sounds great, but it's also really demanding.

    • @Piotre
      @Piotre ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FoliaSound Thanks! This greed for power scares me the most :)
      I'm curious if Reaper users have tried to run AA plugins with ReaRemote on 2 computers, and how it would work.
      Maybe this is a way not to sell the apartment and buy a machine that will allow you to work freely with a large number of instances.

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Piotre , you can also make it happen with VSL or Steinberg VST Connect!

  • @JoshSmith-xm4gz
    @JoshSmith-xm4gz ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Very helpful. Im currently wondering whether to invest in Nebula. I'd be interested to hear the difference between a Nebula compressor and a similar Aqua compressor plugin (one using Hyper and also the original core technology). And the difference in CPU usage between the two. Would you be open to doing a video like this?

  • @OldDirtyMors
    @OldDirtyMors หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Aqua plugins are great as well.

  • @ES60Hz
    @ES60Hz 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So what is the difference between N4 programs and Acustica audio plug-ins? Why bother? If I let say have most of Acustica audio plug-ins?

  • @jamesrutherford
    @jamesrutherford ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hello my friend superb show very informative

  • @davidcosta2273
    @davidcosta2273 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello !
    Long time user here !
    If you need tips just ask ;)

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not a beginner myself. Did you see the vid actually? Thanks anyway ;)

  • @jaimegarcia7180
    @jaimegarcia7180 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Alright is this Nebula 4 or Nebula 4.5? You mentioned Nebula 4.5 download but then keep refering to it as Version 4 & I didn't see any "4.5"

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's 4.5 and I call it simply "4", because any subversion still referst to the main version, which is 4 :)

  • @lifegood4467
    @lifegood4467 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can a PC running dual Xeon 2680v4 meet the nebula? do you need vga? thanks

  • @cpssounds3656
    @cpssounds3656 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍

  • @ramspencer5492
    @ramspencer5492 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I missed the period where Nebula switched from 3 to 4. Missed the upgrade period. A lot was happening. You know.... Life! Ended up being a pretty good chunk of time away from recording 😂 Then later, i wanted to too at least be able to use all the many, many libraries I had previously purchased. Made many requests to them to get the link to download version 3. Not one reply. I may have ended up getting nebula 4, But the experience was so frustrating. Worst customer service ever. I didn't feel right investing in them again. Though I love so many third party nebula libraries. They make some decent ones themselves. But the experience was terrible. Especially done there are so many really good algorithmic plugins these days. They're catching up.

    • @favelavegana
      @favelavegana ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll try nebula 3. Is it still worth it?

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      There's Nebula 4.5 already!

    • @favelavegana
      @favelavegana ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FoliaSound , yes but I have Nebula 3 Skins

  • @cone-stone
    @cone-stone ปีที่แล้ว

    Jajajajaja... genial!

  • @77advanced
    @77advanced ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What annoys me the most about nebula is f*d up metering.. it is just broken, after few minutes needles start to stutter and freeze..

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      True, not the strongest part of it...

  • @apeclegendary6005
    @apeclegendary6005 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If Nebula weren't so expensive, it could have been the new vst standard.

    • @davidperez909
      @davidperez909 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tons of used copies out there now for cheap. Do it!

  • @dernuniverse9813
    @dernuniverse9813 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    N4 much melow than yhe SSL plun ....SSL much brighter ...Acustica is magic

  • @tommyleveskmusic
    @tommyleveskmusic ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not difficult, just shitty to use on every CPU! Even the mac pros aren't enough ;)

    • @FoliaSound
      @FoliaSound  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, PCs grow stronger, but Acustica is always hungry...

    • @SoundSignals
      @SoundSignals ปีที่แล้ว

      I have an M1 Mini, zero problems with cpu