ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
- With the release of Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, we wanted to see how the dinos that we love to watch in movies and tv shows hold up under the scrutiny of a dinosaur expert. The verdict? Well, there’s a lot of angry roaring …
In Vulture’s new series, Expert Witness, we ask scientists, historians, and other professionals to give Hollywood movies a good old-fashioned fact check.
nice carnotaurus but the chance he is gonna think about food while a volcano is busting behind him is 0%
Not necessarily. They were all malnourished, might want to take advantage of that chaos to get some food.
cinematic shots. then it's an 100% chance
between two threats, animals will always chose to run from the larger one. he’s right, they wouldn’t think of food at all in this scene. plus i’m pretty sure they weren’t malnourished. they’re living free on an island so they can hunt or scavenge for food whenever
@@peachxy3730 But who are we to 100% be sure that he actually noticed the "bigger threat".
@@korcidiamond3623 That is what I thought, I feel like your right because with all these tiny snacks running around it’s just instinct to attack. And let’s not forget that Mt. Sibo has been rumbling and extremely active for months so the dinosaurs are probably used to it.
Real Dinosaur Reacts to Dinosaur Expert Reacts to Dinosaur Movies
Nice
So birds react to expert
My head exploted
Lololololol
chicken*
I'm surprised he didn't mention that Velociraptors were actually the size of Turkeys and that the Dinosaurs that were called Velociraptors in the films are actually called Denonicus.
Yes you are right. Diliphosaurs were actually much bigger than Raptors/Dienonychus In life Still spit poison too.
Bug Clicko They confirmed that the Dilophosaurus was a juvenile. There was gonna be an adult Dilophosaurus scene in The Lost World but it was cut.
Crichton explains that in the book. At the time (1990s) Deinonychus was considered a species of Velicraptor (Velociraptor antirropus). But you are correct, Velociraptor mongoliensis is about the size of a turkey and the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park are probably Deinonychus antirropus.
@@bugclicko4486 As far as I know, the spitting venom feature they added in JP to Dilophosaurus isn't supported by any evidence.
Well, like you just explained, they were Deinonychus, not actually Velociraptors. So I don't think they would be much point in that, especially since it's probably the most famous and done to death example of inaccuracies in Jurassic Park.
People are getting mad at him for debunking childhood movies when he was asked to do that. The crew chose those movies!
Well, in Jurassic Park, they did actually have reasons for them looking like they did. They used a lot of DNA from other creatures. Henry Wu in Jurassic World goes on a rant about how they act and look very differently than they would if they didn’t have all that other DNA in them.
@@mosterchife6045 I will admit that is one thing about this guy that annoyed me is that he didn't know enough about the movie to realise there were reasons for the dinosaurs appearance and behavior. He even gave that specific explanation without realising that was Jurrasic Park's reason. But regardless it is weird how the crew chose kids movies for him to 'debunk'.
@@captainalie9264 Yeah. A lot of those movies aren’t trying to go for a realistic look. But the only one I can think of that does try to go for a somewhat realistic look is Dinosaur.
@@mosterchife6045 Yeah but the fact that those movies weren't trying to go for a realistic look and the crew chose it anyway is problematic. He was just reacting to what he was given.
@@captainalie9264 Yeah.
Really love the way he inserts "probably" and "maybe". A lot of pseudo dinosaur experts talk like they know for sure about every details of the animals, but in reality there's a lot of speculation, so I like how this expert tells it like it is. "They probably had a range of sound[...]".
i was there man
I can vouch for the pre-pre-historic caveman above: he was there.
I was the dinosaur
Yeah. Same here.
@@geethau4676 I can vouch for the Triassic era caveman above me.He was there punching trees and shit
They did give it more context in Jurassic World. The lead geneticist said that if their DNA was 100% intact they'd look and act very different. The first movie even said they substituted strands from modern animals to fill in gaps.
Nunya Buizness totally agree, just rewatched both and they said exactly the same thing
Plus it’s a theme park most people want Dino’s that look like that not some giant chickens
I heard that for Jurassic Park 3, they wanted to give the raptors feathers, BUT the cgi at the time was not up to animating individual feathers on moving raptors.
In the book it was explained that the compy's had a mild venomous bite. They would bite an animal and then wait for it to lose enough mobility that it cannot fight back. They did that to the man they attacked in Jurassic Park II.
More reason that JW was a terrible sequel with sloppy writing and continuity problems. FK somehow managed to be simultaneously better and worse than JW, if it's even possible.
Well actually in Jurassic World Doctor Wu says “Nothing in Jurassic World is natural! If the dinosaurs DNA were pure, many of them would look quite different. But you didn’t ask for pure, you asked for more teeth!” So the dinosaurs would have looked more accurate if the scientists didn’t use DNA from other animals to fill in the DNA sequence gaps.
well, they added toad DNA and they would be warty.
I know I thought I was the only one that noticed that!
In Michael Crichton's original book, it is addressed that all of the dinosaurs had reconstructed DNA and therefore were just cheap imitations of dinosaurs. Henry Wu actually mentions that since so many artificial mutations were added to the dinosaurs, like the lysine deficiency, even if the dinosaurs were direct clones, they still wouldn't be true dinosaurs.
Nice
Raptors didn’t have feathers because they added lizard DNA instead of avian
*"The only animals we know of that walked on four legs and had sails weren't dinosaurs at all!"*
I'm surprised he passed up the chance to spread the word of how dimetrodon is a synopsid. That's right! We're more closely related to dimetrodon than the dinosaurs were!
And what about spinosaur? He walked on four legs And had a sail
@@Stelio12345 When did this happend? As far as I know it's centre of gravity was relatively far forward to walk bipedal. But maybe my data are outdated
Dude the. Spinosaurus literally had a sail and walked on 4 legs
@@Stelio12345 yes u read it on the internet means it’s 100% true
@@Stelio12345 ok well idk let’s just say truce
This video should be "Dinosaur Expert dies inside of how Hollywood desecrates their work!" xD
DINOSAURS NEVER EXISTED PERIOD, LET ALONE IN THE WAY THEY ARE PORTRAYED IN THE MOVIES...
#FAKE
Being an expert in a manmade field such as being a "dinosaur fossils expert" on animals that never existed in the first place..very sad when all said and done...
@@milovanmilovanov2598 ok
@@milovanmilovanov2598 So I guess I'm a paid actor, being a palaeontologist?
@@milovanmilovanov2598 than i guess the earth is flat and the moon is made of cheese.
@@milovanmilovanov2598 how would u know
I like how the audio goes earrape when the scientists makes a raor sound
Straight earrape 🦻🏼🍆
It is done. If you search in internet you have some research about that (it seems that dinosaur have no larynx and no syrinx). They have use screams and sings of certains birds and goes lower in frequency to have the deep sound. The CT scan of T rex ear cavity indicate that the animal was able to ear low frequency sounds like elephants and crocodiles. The real T rex sound could be close to the lowest notes of a double bass. th-cam.com/video/cpipaUfcnmM/w-d-xo.html for other dinosaurs we must understand the relation between the bones and fleshy parts (extension of palate especially) what is actually difficult.
@@limoucheu8522 I was talking about the SCIENTIST making roaring sounds, i already know that the tyrannosaurus hissed instead of roaring
@@ben737D xD
I literallyread this title as “dinosaur reacts to dinosaur movies” and was like whaaaaaat. Thought they meant the scientist was super old. 😂😂😂
when they bring out the velociraptor video I'm surprised he didn't rage and point out the size because velociraptor ARE THE SIZE OF A LARGE TURKEY
He probably has seen this too often and so many people know about it that there isn't a point bringing it up. And I'm pretty sure the size was based on an unclassified dromaeosaurid (now assigned to the genus Utahraptor), with the general body plan based on Deinonychus (Which was originally classified as a species of Velociraptor) with the name of Velociraptor since it sounded cooler than Deinonychus. Even with all of this aside, the Velociraptors in Jurassic Park are actually supposed to be that size as both Nublarensis and Sornaensis are both Fictitious species of Velociraptor
@@mrsnake6562 I am aware of the deinonychus and valocoraptor does sound better BUT these movies lied to so many people thats the only thing I don't like the valocoraptor.
Still great movies tho
@@bryanfetrow6371 Technically they didn't lie because they are their own species of Velociraptor and that Deinonychus was assigned to Velociraptor, and it would have been difficult to rename the Velociraptors in Jurassic Park to Deinonychus when they're more recognisable as Velociraptor, as well as the name being easier to remember, even after the two species of velociraptor became two separate genera (V. antirrhopus to Deinonychus). And as I said, they'd still be classified as Velociraptor as their Genus name is still Velociraptor whilst their species name changes depending on if they're a Nublar or Sorna raptor in comparison to the two real life species mongoliensis and osmolskae
And they were covered entirely with feathers.
What people tend to overlook in the movies and books is the fact that these dinosaurs were reconstructed with frog DNA. In the books some of the dinosaurs had several versions created before they kept some alive so the question of if they were even “real” were brought in the books a couple times
Yes, they had a version number, like software. I thought that was cool.
What people who say this tend to overlook is that Spielberg was on record saying that his intention was to create scientifically accurate dinosaurs with artistic touches. The frog DNA was a thematic device.
@@seaofseeof the director. Not the author. Not even archeologists. Dude was trying to make something that would sell a movie. Velociraptors were not 6 feet tall.
Edit: Hell even the geneticists in the story didn't know what to do. They were stuck between people's preconceived notions of what dinosaurs were supposed to be and what they might actually be if they were accurately cloned.
@@yetitheeduardo The director of the movie which is a separate entity from the book. And movies are the subject of this TH-cam video It doesn't matter what creative decisions Crichton made for his books, as Spielberg made his own decisions specific for his works. Spielberg said, literally, that he was trying to display actual dinosaurs. Not monsters. The frog DNA's purprose was to show that dinosaurs could breed, in the context of the film, which was supposed to tie into Malcolm's claim that 'life finds a way', which he responded with in a debate with Dr. Wu, because he took issue with Wu's arrogance in thinking he could "control nature". THAT is the role of the frog DNA in the film. It ties into the theme. That's it. But to the movie audience, these animals were always supposed to be dinosaurs with some creative embelishments, as you do in movies. You can claim that you know Spielberg's intent better than he does, but either way, his goal was to create accurate dinosaurs. Not monsters. And the dinosaurs in the original Jurassic Park were quite revolutionary in how accurate they were in comparison to past portrayals. They may not have aged well in almost 30 years, but all things considered, they were pretty much amazing seeing as T.rex, prior to this film, was still a lumbering tripod in minds of most people.
Then they shouldn't be called dinosaurs at all. They should be called something else.
As I remember, “Earl”, from the “Dinosaurs” of the early 90’s, was a Megalosaurus, but his co-worker, Roy, was a T-Rex. As far as I am aware there have been no complete fossil skeletons of Megalosaurus, found. However, upon findings, it is believed that Megalosaurus was closely related to Allosaurus and Giganotosaurus.
Just occurred to me that Jurassic Park probably took the feather-producing phenotypes out of the dinosaurs while they were making them, so the crowds would be more familiar with them.
it was the frog dna in the dinos that made them not have feathers
@@Kiren129
Also, do people really expect that there would be 100% Dinosaur genome found today ? That's impossible. InGen had to fill the genetic gaps with something.
@@WhyTho525 Actually, it's not impossible.
@@WhyTho525 www.scientificamerican.com/article/possible-dinosaur-dna-has-been-found/
they're actually getting there. Isn't that insane?
@
Interesting read. I knew that eventually dinosaur DNA will be found, but not 100% pure dinosaur DNA. However, maybe as technology progresses, we might get there in some time.
Courtesy of Arthur Weasley? Nice to see he's found a side-hobby.
Besides collecting plugs you mean?
"It is in the rock that scientists make real discoveries, What Hammond did was create a group of genetically engineered theme monsters"
He kinda looks like John Carpenter.
more like einstein to me
@@randir6667 :-D :-D :-D
Old commissioner Gordon
🤣 I was scrolling reactions cause I thought so aswell
His final thought did happen in the scene in Jurassic World between Dr Wu and Masrani:
"*laughs* nothing in jurassic world is natural we always filled the gaps in the genome with DNA from other animals, in fact, if we didnt, most of these animals would have looked quite different but you didn't ask for 'reality' YOU ASKED FOR MORE TEETH!"
"I never asked for a monster..."
"'Monster' is a relative term, to a canary, a cat is a monster... we're just used to being a cat".
fax alot of the dinosaurs dna gaps were filled with frog dna
"...when we rebuild them from DNA, we added these features..."
In all fairness... Didn't they bring that demanded statement in Jurassic Park 3? I mean Dr. Grant stated in that movie that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago and that the animals on the InGen islands were just genetically engineered "theme park monsters".
Would've been interesting to mention the prevailing hypothesis about sounds made by animals like T rex and how they were much more likely to make closed mouth vocalisations (like crocodiles) than they were to roar.
Roaring cooler though, imagine how boring the sounds would be if there was no roaring
@@KarlismiSN have you HEARD a croc? Amp up the volume and bass and you've got a likely T. rex sound, and it'd be absolutely terrifying
@@VoxTenebrae true, but it wouldnt be nearly as epic
@Nightmare1398 dont klnow man i'd probably die of shock from such a loud noise
The main character in the tv show "Dinosaurs" is referred to many times as a Megalosaurus.
"The Mighty Megalosaurus!"
I was going to say the same thing.
For some reason I remember him saying he was an allosaurus
This was absolutely delightful. I love learning more about my favorite movie’s theme, especially if there is more facts and science involved. And I like how he didn’t trash the dramatic licenses that hollywood takes to make things more entertaining. He acknowledges that these are works of fiction, for entertainment only, and that they did an ok job here, not so great there, but hey they’re movies.
Great job!
Imagine sitting next to this guy in a movie theatre. “No......No.....wrong....wrong”
😀😅
Lmfao buzz kill
E
I AM that dude in a theater 😂
Elbow to the face...
I always have a bit of a laugh at the "Flock of birds evading a predator" line because 38 seconds later we find out they were.
The Spielberg directed movies are full of moments like that.
1:51 Not a T. rex. He's the Mighty Megalosaurus!
Some "expert" eh? 😄
Throw him in the tar pit.
They should've shown him Walking with dinosaurs
Yeah, the documentary, NOT the trash movie. When Dinosaurs Roamed America too.
I don’t believe he would’ve survived from cringe alone.
@@huntercool2232 he's talking about the sane, acceptable,good documentary
Alright trying to ask him how close cartoon dinosaurs or people/dinosaurs are is kind of annoying and wastin time
Obviously those aren't meant to be taken as accurate representations unlike the other ones maybe
Yeah that kind of annoyed me. I'm not sure if patronising is the correct word, but it was just.. weird.
I love his ending statement. Itwould be great to have that tad bit little of information added somewhere in the script. we all know these movies are fiction, but that little piece of information would satisfy those of us who consider ourselves "realistic accurists".
I'll show myself out..
7:30 its actually explained in the first jurrasic park that they spliced the dino dna with frog dna so the dinosaurs look much more reptillian than they would normally look.
I know he's gonna react as realistically as possible but still, everyone just tears into The Good Dinosaur :(
Cuz that movie was absolutely stupid.
@@bobcat24 Toy Story 4 was stupider.
@Sosnir De Jejejo Don’t tell me to shut up, I can say whatever I want. My rights are protected.
@@TheChildofAuraReborn I wasn’t even talking about that movie, but I think it’s equally stupid
@Sosnir De Jejejo
Toxic kids like you make TH-cam a much worse place than it should be.
nice to see his postive additude
As a kid, I thought that dimetrodon was a dinosaur, but it wasn't. Cool sail tho )
Everyone did. It's not our fault toy companies keep including it in their dino sets. Same thing with the flying reptiles like Pterodactyl.
Bruh same
Funnily it was closer to mammals than reptiles, more ancient than dinosaurs..
My biggest problem with this video: He talks about Compsognathus having feathers, yet shows a picture of a feathered creature that is NOT Compsognathus. That picture was of Archaeopteryx.
True.
Editing team seems lazy
I’d say that was a mistake on the part of those that made the video. I’m sure he never saw the image of the Archaeopteryx while filming this.
and putting six out of ten for the braciosauris , srriously isn't that too severe
In "Journey to the Center of the Earth" the lizards with sails are explicitly referred to as dimetrodons, not dinosaurs, so this example avoided the mistake described here.
7:23 in the Jurassic Park lore, there is a reason why dinosaurs are different than they were. For example, the Dilophosaurus had frilled-lizard DNA, as well as the Raptor had frog dna, which explains the absence of feathers and the Dilophosaurus frill. All the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park had partial frog DNA because the scientists were not able to get a full column of DNA string, so they had to fill it.
Note: Earl from "dinossaurs" is a Megalosaurus, his friend is a T-Rex
I really appreciate that @ 03:30 we are told that there was a limit to the size of a dinosaur egg - any egg for that matter - because the strenght of the eggshell isn't sufficient to support bigger eggs.
Why not have stronger eggshells, thus bigger eggs? The chick had to be able to break the shell or the species would go extinct.
You really didn't have to show the 90's "Dinosaurs" to a Columbia professor to let us know how accurate it is. Even then, he forgot to mention dinosaurs don't have sophisticated vocal cords to sound out intelligible English vocabulary
You deserve more subs.
I like how he doesn't even mention that velociraptors were like 3 feet tall lol.
Love how he loves the Gallimimus scene, feels like a peek into life on earth in the cretaceous.
0:02 velociraptor yelling and Human screaming _> captions MUSIC 🤨
Because it had music and said that instead of screaming
Applause💀
some other paleontologist in another video on the brachiosaurus:
"they definitely could not stand up"
and this man right here says they almost certainly could stand up
what's the truth?
Should have done ARK
This is Cancer Gaming Beaver did that.
Everything would be a 1/10 in accuracy
@@mroviraptor3987 still would be intrigued as to what they say nonetheless.
Technically they could all be 100% accurate, none of the dinosaurs in ARK are a real species, the Genera are real (I.e Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, Utahraptor), However the animals actually in game never appeared in the fossil record and are fantastical fictional species. An example would be for the Parasaurolophus. In actuality, Parasaurolophus as a Genus has 3 distinct species (possibly four if counting Charonosaurus), those being P. walkeri, P. tubicen, P. cyrtocristatus and P. jiayensis. The species that appears in game is Parasaurolophus amphibius, not one of the real world species. Again with Tyrannosaurus, there's T. rex and T. bataar (Or not depending on whether you believe Tarbosaurus to actually be a species of Tyrannosaurus), but in the game it is actually T. dominum
And Walking with Dinosaurs
That lizard looking dinosaur from journey from the center of the earth reminds me of a Dimetrodon.
@Twiddly Stosh He would have been referring to the entire group that Dimetrodon was part of. There was a huge extended group of synapsids similar to Dimetrodon that all had sails. It's very interesting as there are many groups from the carboniferous to the permian that all evolved a sail on their back independently from each other. I think even some early archosaurs also had them but I could be wrong
They actually are meant to be dimetrodons. In the movie the characters call them dimetrodons, not dinosaurs.
All of us wanted to be a dinosaur expert at one point
what i find hilarious is that Paul Olsen looks like an older version of William H. Macy from Jurassic Park 3
Professor In Jurassic park the frog bird reptile dna blending to fill the gene sequence gaps is what made them look different from what they are in the fossils so I consider them to be a subspecies of dinosaurs
0:21 me about to do the dishes because I want to.
2 seconds later: "make sure you do the dishes"
The original JP was very accurate for the time.
They kinda mention in Jurassic World that the Dinos would look different if they were ACTUAL dinosaurs, but given they are literal mutants they look different.
Oh maaaaan, this was the perfect opportunity to invite a real dinosaur to react to dinosaur movies. SMH
Lets see what he says about the Giga in Jurassic World Dominion
Fuck you
Well to be fair in Dinosaurs Earl has claimed multiple times that he's a "mighty megalasaurus!" And with Jurassic Park they actually already did provide an explanation that would explain any deviations from reality. In the first movie they establish those dinosaurs were cloned and brought to life using amphibian (frog DNA) to fill in the holes of their DNA sequences. Heck the dinosaurs were even made to be all female and lysine deficient...and then "life found a way"
I always remembered earl saying he was an allosaurus but I guess i was wrong
@@wilsoniothegreat6162 meh you could be right. I'll have to check up on that
@@fidel0666 yea but other people say he’s a megalosaurus so i think i might be wrong
@@wilsoniothegreat6162 cool cool. I need to rewatch those. It was pretty good for it's time
In his final thoughts they actually did that in the scene of jurassic world when Mr. Masrani was trying to get info from Dr. Wu on the hybrid the indominus, during that conversation Dr. Wu clearly stated that "if they're genetic code was pure many of them would look quite different but you didn't ask for reality you asked for more teeth."
I learned so much about this video than my classes...
They should have shown the Baryonyx too.
It looks radically different from its real life counterpart.
The main lesson here is don't mess with Steven Spielberg cause he knows what he's doing and has never disappointed. It would have been nice if he directed Kong vs Godzilla, he's very good with explosion and chaotic scenes, action packed scenes that is.
5:35 ok is no one gonna talk about that movie being the source of that tiktok audio?
4:21 for those T Rex fanboys who say Spinosaurus was quadrupedal.
Bruh
Thank god we got rid of that ridiculous idea that Spinosaurus was bipedal.
@@godofthecripples1237 it's not completely gone just unlikely it's a very difficult dinosaur to figure out
It had short legs ...so it must be quad or semi.
@@MouahbiAyoub That's not at all how weight distribution works. We know for a fact it was bipedal.
Just for fun, I'd like to see his view on fictional dinos/kaiju like Godzilla, Titanasaurus, Anguirus and Gorosaurus
Yes, he has a face of dinosaur expert
sauropods had long necks so they could conserve energy from moving their huge bodies around. move a little, eat everything in an arc around you. probably why their necks evolved so long as it allowed them to graze a much wider area; it's probably why their heads were smaller, less weight on the end of their neck, less energy to move it towards food. they ate ginkos and ferns and stuff. some may have had chambered stomachs but we know for sure, from fossils, is that they also ate rocks, like chickens do, to help digest plant-matter. the rocks act like molars (which is why birds lost their teeth: they evolved a gizzard). so... their necks werent for reaching high leaves, it was for every other advantage you've probably never thought of.
He completely forgot to mention one of the most crucial discoveries in depiction of dinosaurs - bipedal dinosaurs had supinated hands, for the most part. This is clearly wrong both with the velociraptors, and the gallimimus horde.
Additionally, the carnotaurus is WAAAAAY too robustly built. They were sprinters, it makes no sense to give them massive, columb-sized legs.
the legs were fine, it is just the head that is built wrong, and the tail could be a bit thicker, but the legs would have needed to be powerhouses, that said, it wouldn't have been able to turn as well while running, and the tail is a bit too flexible in the movies, but for the most part the carnotaurus is good, but i haven't looked at carnotaurus studies in a while, so i might have outdated information
@@DINO_X65 The tail needed to be thicker too, Carnotaurus had almost an exaggerated amount of muscle on the bottom of the tail to give it incredible acceleration. They also didn't have the cool spiky scutes (which is tragic but what can you do), and his face was a little long but otherwise, yeah, he's a good big runny boy. Mesozoic Sports Car Dino.
@@BiryuTheFox can't turn fast tho
@@DINO_X65 Boi can't drift, a shame.
He also said the JP Gallimimus where too large but if anything too small. Gallimimus were good sized animals 20 feet long and over 6 feet tall at the hip. Of course like all other Ornithomimids they would have been covered in feathers with the largest feathers on the arms. All the theropod dinosaurs in the JP/JW movies have non supinated hands. Another pet peeve of mine I wish they would fix of I would have a list a mile long for them to fix lol 😆
Him: "leaping lizards"
Me:"sir you had my curiosity, now you have my attention."
what people forget everytime someone says the depiction of dinosaurs from jurassic park is wrong forget that they used Frog DNA to fill the gaps in the dinosaurs DNA strands, which is the reason they look more like evolved frogs than feathery beasts of what dinosaur experts feel would be more plausible.
I think this every time I see stuff like that.... like, we don't have the full DNA, we can't know EXACTLY what they looked/sounded/acted like... Although I reeeally did enjoy this video xD
They look _nothing_ like “evolved frogs” at all....in jurassic park they essentially fit into the standard of dinosaur paleoart typical of the 90s and early 2000s to an extent
@@jasonvoorhees5180 that's the point, I guess
exactly if they didnt use frog dna the dinos would like like some deformed birds that got dropped on they hed multiple times bc the dna wasnt complete
the issue of dinosaurs having different behavioral traits, being larger or smaller, and having different physiology (such as Dilophosaurus spitting acid and T. Rex only being able to see based on movement) was addressed in Jurassic Park the game, if that's any consolation to Professor Olsen.
1:25 what about the innaccurate elephant like feets
i hate that he didn't mention the most obvious flaws mainly being velociraptors in jp and jw are not actually velociraptors and that all the theropods were given broken wrists pointing downwards rather than their arms and wrists pointing inwards and folded backwards very much like birds wings.
My friend doesn’t believe that some dinosaurs had feathers 🤦♀️
Thats not your friend
Lemme guess he's religious and doesn't believe in evolution. Not a problem. Just the fact that science proves whatever point about dinos not having feathers is wrong.
@@voidastro4873 no he doesnt exist
@@foiletta1987 wot?
@@voidastro4873 he is dum
It's a few years since I read it but I remember the Jurrasic Park book spending a lot of time explaining DNA, different element ect.
Actually now that you mention it, I wanna hear dinosours making bird noise. I hear the used elephant, alligator and goose noises to make the t-rex. What if it made angry honking noises of a swan, or hissing of a canadian geese. Personally I would find that hilariously/terrifying. (Anyone who has been randomly attacked by canadian goose can agree)
I feel like they always throw in the most ridiculous clips to get these people flustered and speechless
“Not the momma “ Is a “Mighty Megalosaurus”. I love Dinosaurs. Best show back then.😍
Its very intertaning watching this guy roar
1:56 that is a TV show called dinosaurs. That was not a t.rex it was earl the megalosaurus
I love learning about dinosaurs fr
There is a valid reason why they arnt scientifically accurate in jp, they didnt have complete dinosaur dna, they had to mix it with frog dna which would obviously get rid of some of the feathers, or the way the arms face
My mom: those dinosaurs are not realistic.
Me: yeah but they modified the dna from the dinosaurs
Mom: that isn't realistic
Me: just let me enjoy the God damn movie!
Yeah i can related it so much with my dad. He is always saying that those movies are fake.
My mom is not like that my mom is the one that enjoys the movie
It is unrealistic to even extract dino dna
@@Anytyme06 yeah true. Scientists tried to use the jurrasic park technique to get dino blood. Just to realize that it is already gone and rotten away for a long time.
@@jordiverswyvel8126 what's funny is if you took blood from a mosquito that bit a dinosaur, you would get mosquito DNA.
Fun facts:
1: they’ve found that velociraptors were actually no taller then about halfway up your calf, covered in feathers, and very teeny tiny teeth, but did the have famous toe claw
2: T-Rex, while it was massive, had feathers, not just leathery skin. And communicated more like giraffes with more “huffing” and “grunting” sounds at very low tones.
3: dinos like Spinasaurus, Stegosaurus, and Ankleasaurus, were not real and actually fake.
4: Most of the dinos People have come to know and love, existed in completely different timelines and probably never ever knew eachother
5: dinos were actually commonly a lot smaller then you’d think.
6: dinos were a lot less harmful then people think
7: dinos communicated more like birds then “rawr”s
It has not been confirmed yet that trex had feathers, the reason people doubt it at the moment is because it would overheat if it had too much, the only reason they might have had feathers is for display, and it would not be that much of it if any.
@@ratreptile well you’re more then welcome to do the research yourself, but archeologists and paleontologists are saying it did. Not very big feathers for flight, pretty small feathers, possibly to move through the trees and brush better
Spinosaurus stegosaurus and ankylosaurus are real lmao
Would have been interested in his opinion of the convergent evolution of the humanoid dinosaurs found by the Voyager Star Trek crew in the Delta quadrant.
7:16 they did in the 1st one. How a certain frogs change sex and using it's DNA has caused the Dinosaurs to reproduce. All the more reason to love the 1st one from 1993.
*Dinosaur Expert*
Paleontologists: Am I a joke to you?
That’s pretty much what a Paleontologist is.You wouldn’t think they didn’t know so much about dinosaurs if they weren’t experts,did you?
@@its_ezralol The joke is that they used the title dinosaur expert instead of paleontologist like people don’t know what a paleontologist is.
DINOSAURS NEVER EXISTED PERIOD, LET ALONE IN THE WAY THEY ARE PORTRAYED IN THE MOVIES...
#FAKE
Being an expert in a manmade field such as being a "dinosaur fossils expert"/Paleontologists on animals that never existed in the first place..very sad when all said and done...
@@milovanmilovanov2598 Dinosaurs have been proven to exist. That doesn’t disprove your religion. Just educate yourself on geology and biology and pretty soon you’ll realize that dinosaurs did exist.
@@SimonD007 as a christian myself It hurts me seeing people thinking that religion and science are uncompatible, nice to see someone Who knows they are, in fact compatible, i just know most of the "facts" in the bible are fairy tales
me turning on captions:
carnotaurus and t-rex roaring: *a*
but how can we trust this guy, hes never SEEN a dino has he?
have you?
Stifnoxii I have .. I am a dinosaur
And now for a dinosaur! [a chicken begins slowly being driven towards you by a drivable toy truck as that "training video for the Krusty Krab" guy does his acapella fanfare]
He has seen and studied what they left behind. So we know that the things he said is correct.
Because he has studied them his entire life.
I'm surprised you didn't bring up the scene from Fantasia with the T-Rex battling the Stegosaurus, and how the two actually existed millions of years apart.
04:30 Well that aged like milk.
Spinos did walk on two legs
That poor man. They forced this passionate, intelligent person who seriously studies a real area of humanity-wide interest to comment on cartoons. Kudos to him for being so gracious. :)
Earl from Dinosaur is supposed to be a Megalasaurus.
No iguanodon
*Megalosaurus
@@TheRealRip-Tide He calls himself the Mighty Megalosaurus all the time in the show.
I suggest to imagine an overgrown alligator on steroids, that is hungry, runs on two feet and faster than you. That's how pretty much Trex looked like I guess.
It's more bird like
But yeah it fits the description
A lot of "experts" in these comments lmao
The quills on the velociraptor jp3 wasn’t Jurassic park trying to be accurate, but just on the fact that those velociraptors on isla sorna were a failed attempt of trying to put feathers on it but dr wu failed to do so and left them there when InGen got destroyed and abandoned
1:24 I think this is inaccurate. There are SO many sources that say that brachiosaurus could not stand on its hind legs.
Earl Sinclair from the Dinosaurs show was actually supposed to be a Megalosaurus. He mentions that many times if you’ve ever watched the show. His friend, Roy Hess is a T. Rex though, and it’s much more obvious than Earl’s specie.
Dodogama
@@omegALPHA_282 best chubby boi
@@norsebarbarian2843 yes im master rank 20 and i never killed one they are too cute
4:20 dimetrodon
Dimetrodon isn't a dinosaur, but it's often confused as one. To be a dinosaur, an animal has to belong to a specific family of dinosaurs. But dimetrodon is actually a synapsid and is related to modern day mammals.
“They look like they are made of play dough and bear no resemblance to anything that ever lived” LMAOOOO
As nonsense as The Land Before Time is, I always thought it was a half decent depiction of an extinction event.
Also it was the first dinosaur movie to have T. rex be fast and occasionally in a horizontal posture
@@hypn0298
I wonder if they did any actual research for it?
@@MostlyPennyCat pretty sure the original creator was close friends with a paleontologist
I wish the newer Jurassic movies went back to the JP3 Raptor design. Loved the quills on top of the male raptors
Lol they do talk about what they've added to their DNA
Lol you look so much like Pedro Pascal
He probably doesn’t know
I have a hard time believing that this man who’s never been around a dinosaur can be an “expert”.
He’s an expert on fantasy