Youngest self-made female billionaire takes high-tech approach to blood testing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2015
  • Elizabeth Holmes is being compared to visionaries like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. Holmes founded a biotech company called Theranos in 2003, and her mission is to allow blood testing in every drugstore at a fraction of Medicare costs. Norah O'Donnell reports on how her tiny invention is reshaping health care.

ความคิดเห็น • 5K

  • @QuadiePoo
    @QuadiePoo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9323

    “Little is known about how Theranos tests work”
    That line has aged… lol

  • @jacobdesioreviews
    @jacobdesioreviews 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3531

    The fact that anyone believed her with zero evidence is shocking

    • @toodles1472
      @toodles1472 2 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      She hypnotized people with her eyes

    • @a.sydney5036
      @a.sydney5036 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Contracts with conglomerates 🤯

    • @prateeksuman51
      @prateeksuman51 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Shhhh!!! It's trade secret.

    • @Poker-is8dt
      @Poker-is8dt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Welcome to religion! lol so many fools it's hilarious

    • @sweethomemars5583
      @sweethomemars5583 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Poker-is8dt change your name to joker

  • @issyjas3309
    @issyjas3309 ปีที่แล้ว +344

    “Healthcare is the leading cause of bankruptcy “ Yep she nailed that one.

    • @abhishekforever01
      @abhishekforever01 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lols

    • @Inkling777
      @Inkling777 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, and all the investment money that went to her company wasn't available to deal with those runaway costs.

    • @ashwinireddy4297
      @ashwinireddy4297 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a quality comment.

    • @williamjameslehy1341
      @williamjameslehy1341 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only in America. I wonder why? Other countries must have access to magic blood machines.

  • @will6603
    @will6603 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +124

    What a nice lady! Theranos looks like it's going to truly change the world for the better. I sure hope she isn't lying about literally everything.

    • @abramsrob
      @abramsrob 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Lmao 💀 🤣

    • @richardgibson1872
      @richardgibson1872 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it's literally a scam

  • @zoacynic1365
    @zoacynic1365 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4572

    Never trust a person who never blinks.

    • @axmortz
      @axmortz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      she did blink a few times during the interview.

    • @iverr6
      @iverr6 5 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      @@axmortz Like once, lol.

    • @alex_evstyugov
      @alex_evstyugov 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @iverr6: it's a pity you can only count to one. Maybe close TH-cam and go to school some time? Just a suggestion.

    • @ingriddubbel8468
      @ingriddubbel8468 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      She does blink. Her eyes make her look crazy. And she is crazy.

    • @Macantaya
      @Macantaya 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      She does blinked

  • @apratim4345
    @apratim4345 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7762

    Interviewer: how does it work?
    Holmes: we've created a small tube to replace the big tube.
    *Interviewer stunned*

    • @arjunchatterjee9362
      @arjunchatterjee9362 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Bangali?

    • @jianbaiwang6625
      @jianbaiwang6625 5 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      I can create a small tube too!

    • @sheryldpipe6016
      @sheryldpipe6016 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      She didn't even make a face so 🤷‍♀️

    • @faisalalan8633
      @faisalalan8633 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ههههههههههههه

    • @sheryldpipe6016
      @sheryldpipe6016 5 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      @Neil O'Neal oh come on that wasn't all. It was her manly voice to.

  • @jenng9899
    @jenng9899 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    “Little is known about how Theranos tests work”
    *looks at the camera like I’m on the office*

  • @gen2160
    @gen2160 ปีที่แล้ว +167

    I remember watching this on the news and my parents both said , “how can you get that many results with such a small amount of blood?” 😂😂

    • @lynnmahan154
      @lynnmahan154 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Smart parents.

    • @wiseguy9202
      @wiseguy9202 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Technology! The Genalyte Maverick is doing what Elizabeth couldn't.

    • @adrianafalcon983
      @adrianafalcon983 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @g3nov3s
      @g3nov3s หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's what many investors also asked and Elizabeth would just wave her hand and say: "Ehhh....Science...." and people were like "Ahhh...ok...".

  • @ryllae8059
    @ryllae8059 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2659

    Her eyes freak me out

    • @oldi184
      @oldi184 5 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Call me crazy tin foil hatter but I bet 50 bucks that she is alien from other planet or solar system.

    • @praveenchandran4403
      @praveenchandran4403 5 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Ya. Same here. Her eyes somehow tell everyone. Why is she trying to get her eyes out so much. Didn't people feel it?

    • @charon2987
      @charon2987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      me too, they are too big

    • @stephenconlon653
      @stephenconlon653 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      She looks like she’s got exothalmus caused by a thyroid problem

    • @Lelelelenda
      @Lelelelenda 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It scares me too🙄

  • @ekkamailax
    @ekkamailax 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5712

    “She had a little money and a big idea”
    Correction: she grew up with a multimillion dollar trust fund and billionaire family friends. This allowed her to never need a 9-5 job to pay the bills and easily get access to funding for her “idea”

    • @IamGodSon
      @IamGodSon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      The media with these fabricated success stories.

    • @linacoo7430
      @linacoo7430 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Why not to lock her up as they do it with Assange. She caused more danger to society than Wikileaks reveals.

    • @HopefulInterventions
      @HopefulInterventions 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Exactly!

    • @ekkamailax
      @ekkamailax 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@IamGodSon after working in tech for a decade one thing I learned is that media outlets are just paid marketing channels. They don’t report news, they report whatever you pay them to say. All PR and branding b.s

    • @samb4697
      @samb4697 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@HopefulInterventions charmed the Jury, she is a con artist just like Bernie Madoff, one male jury has been charmed by her.

  • @natedogyoung
    @natedogyoung 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    The reason she succeeded is because in society we are in love with the idea of a young dropout showing up all the "fogeys with PhDs" who said "it can't be done". Again and again we refuse to believe boring experts and pick the maverick instead. There will be plenty of more Elizabeth Holmes because fundamentally we are anti-intellectual and resent real expertise.

    • @t.w.8174
      @t.w.8174 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You absolutely nailed it with this comment.

  • @marievandelaar2825
    @marievandelaar2825 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    As a 26 year old entrepreneur, i was looking for inspiring business movies or series to watch. It is now 3 AM, i could not stop binging The Dropout series. I stumbled onto this without diving too deep in the trailers. During episode 1,2 and 3 i was rooting for Elizabeth because the entrepreneurial spirit it takes to overcome obstacles. About 4 episodes in i started hating this woman with every fiber in me. By the time she changed her voice to be more "deep" i was about to pull my hair out. Can you imagine the bone chilling shock i got at the end of episode 8 when they started listing the real-life case updates, it was literally just then that i realized this was a real life event. I am young and not from the US, so i never heard of Theranos or the real Elizabeth. This is insane on a level unimaginable. Elizabeth, you are a disgrace to all Women, Humanity and the entire Entrepreneur Society. The fact that even after all this, you can remain cool about your crimes proves you are a psychopathic monster with alien eyes, a demons hart and an insufferable pretentious voice. I hope justice prevails in honor of all lives lost, families ruined financially or in health. F YOU!

    • @mei-meithomas5944
      @mei-meithomas5944 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree totally. She's psychopath.

    • @italia689
      @italia689 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      11 years in prison. Started a few days ago.

    • @su2spinors
      @su2spinors 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Calm down. You watched a popular series, that is not a world changing event.

    • @adelle970
      @adelle970 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ridiculous how this was a series for us to find out 🙈.. never heard of her!

    • @abhir7823
      @abhir7823 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@italia689
      Already reduced to 9 years

  • @oni5153
    @oni5153 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5217

    The fact that she managed to fool so many people for over a decade is pure madness.

    • @moisemensah8233
      @moisemensah8233 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      It's Gone Girl on steroids!

    • @EriiikaGuerra
      @EriiikaGuerra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Right? I can’t wrap my head around this

    • @jones2277
      @jones2277 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      nah, it's white privilege.

    • @uPSIDEdOWN577
      @uPSIDEdOWN577 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      @@jones2277 nah apparently it was her voice that people make such a big deal about. How does someone get manipulated by a voice ? I have no idea 😂😂

    • @nadiaishimwe3663
      @nadiaishimwe3663 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@uPSIDEdOWN577 lower voices seem more trustworthy- wiser, if you will. Some people are just stupid enough to ignore the signs.

  • @wheelinthesky300
    @wheelinthesky300 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2776

    Honestly, I would go to a professional for blood diagnostics.
    This company is going to be hit up with lawsuits for false negatives and false positives.

    • @AjaxNixon
      @AjaxNixon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1349

      Dang dude, you were pretty spot on

    • @Jst4fun817
      @Jst4fun817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +437

      How did you know?

    • @wheelinthesky300
      @wheelinthesky300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +882

      @@Jst4fun817 I don't even remember posting this comment. I'm going to watch the vid again and try to understand why I came to that conclusion.

    • @wheelinthesky300
      @wheelinthesky300 3 ปีที่แล้ว +199

      @@Jst4fun817 OK, watched the clip again.
      At 2:55, CBS actually does its job as journalists and raises a red flag
      about the secrecy of Theranos's methods.
      Right there I smelled something rotten in Denmark.
      Namely, a rotten 31-year old Alpha Female con artist.
      Most probably because I encountered the type before,
      both male and female.
      If it sounds too good to be true
      -it probably is.

    • @manutdfanGH
      @manutdfanGH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +405

      You are a prophet

  • @emilyeileen4089
    @emilyeileen4089 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Amanda Seyfried did a great job impersonating her terrible voice 🤣🤣🤣

  • @cherrybombcoffee
    @cherrybombcoffee ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Update . . . She's in jail . . .

  • @Victory987
    @Victory987 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2814

    This aged like milk.

    • @TyWerks
      @TyWerks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      😂😂

    • @holidaytrout5174
      @holidaytrout5174 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Nah, this is a multi flavored cringe wine.

    • @jaseanthony70
      @jaseanthony70 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Keeps well when sealed and heat treated… lol

    • @calciocampo
      @calciocampo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha, brilliant!

    • @defiverr4697
      @defiverr4697 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      convicted milk now!

  • @nosuchthing8
    @nosuchthing8 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3616

    Didnt anyone notice she never gave any details about the process?

    • @joses.m.43
      @joses.m.43 5 ปีที่แล้ว +216

      Same with the TED talk. No data whatsoever

    • @helenarichard
      @helenarichard 5 ปีที่แล้ว +165

      Reminds me of Fuckerberg during his trial. Ugh. People are so gullible. These interviews though, even though they are not roasting her, you can tell the interviewer is not believing her.

    • @bludika
      @bludika 5 ปีที่แล้ว +95

      thats what she's been doing for the last 10+ years lol, just incredible how long she was able to get by with that lie

    • @manawa3832
      @manawa3832 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      same crap with elon tech daddie. the fanboys of the cult of silicone valley are really gullible and these are the same industrialist worshippers who trash talk religious people but here we are.

    • @whoknowswhocares885
      @whoknowswhocares885 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      And yet idiots still invested in this

  • @LucidEyes17
    @LucidEyes17 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    This lady seems very trustworthy and competent! There is no chance her company's technology is an elaborate fraud and she's the medical industry's Bernie Madoff. Give this woman 9 billion dollars and don't ask questions!

    • @Donah
      @Donah ปีที่แล้ว +2

      COOL! WHERE DO I SIGN UP!

    • @Paul-tn3sc
      @Paul-tn3sc ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Caroline Ellison - Pfft. Fraud. Hold my latte...

    • @edub9930
      @edub9930 ปีที่แล้ว

      "If it's all white, it's all right!" 👌

  • @jasonr6262
    @jasonr6262 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7937

    That fact that anyone, including news media, would believe a college dropout could make medical innovations that PhDs couldn't achieve is scary... We should all be more skeptical of people like her

    • @sofiaguerrero0969
      @sofiaguerrero0969 5 ปีที่แล้ว +198

      I mean she was a college dropout from Stanford lol

    • @elsapatito99
      @elsapatito99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +849

      @@sahraskellington1065 its totally different... They built companies based on programming. She was building a company based on medicine. No one in their early 20's knows enough medicine to claim they can have the solution to a certain medical issue, PLUS you would be risking lives

    • @sahraskellington1065
      @sahraskellington1065 5 ปีที่แล้ว +108

      eche ar you‘re right, I never thought about it that way. I guess it is very different when it comes to the medical field.

    • @kbuss10
      @kbuss10 5 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      its called female narrative. you cant question her cos then youre a women hating virgin whos just jealous cos you didnt score and didnt get the billions. even you have 3 phds in neuroscience and haematology. sad that USA is taking the wolrd in this direction. ME, I cannot seriously believe that there werent men in that science field that wanted to question her statements. from other leading companies for example. But they were too afraid to have their carrier destroyed and called a womenhater by the mainstream media.

    • @Ani-vs8gm
      @Ani-vs8gm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +154

      Programming is a new field...starting in only 80s...
      Medicine in 4000 years of knowledge....by the time a doctor completes his education he is in late 20s to early 30s...
      And if you want research then you have to train more years

  • @donjindra
    @donjindra 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3902

    This story shows how gullible the media is.

    • @Dave-jv3th
      @Dave-jv3th 5 ปีที่แล้ว +156

      You're right, but it's also the media (WSJ) that exposed her.

    • @MeiYingLim
      @MeiYingLim 5 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      And investors too

    • @qtaro-7097
      @qtaro-7097 5 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      all they know is to deliver race baiting news

    • @tynicole88
      @tynicole88 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      The journalists are apart of the craziness, they fed into this story

    • @Retroearthling
      @Retroearthling 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Don investors and everyone else believed her too. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT.? Trumper

  • @Tomytoism
    @Tomytoism ปีที่แล้ว +5

    She's not even blinking 😂

  • @InnerPartyMember
    @InnerPartyMember ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The moment I heard that voice I knew something wasn't right.
    Had a strong feeling that she was lying the entire time, just a pure GUT feeling.
    Surprised so many people didn't get the same feelings when looking at her and watching her speak.
    And the media LOVED her, so that was also a huge red flag.

  • @phillyst4668
    @phillyst4668 5 ปีที่แล้ว +927

    She literally gave no information as to how it works.

    • @MatameVideos
      @MatameVideos 5 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      She only talks in detail about the nanotainers size and purpose and that's it. Probably because that's the only thing from her company she desinged herself, and because the "tiny tube" that can hold blood Is the only thing that works.

    • @GhostMonkey772
      @GhostMonkey772 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      If you watch documentaries on theranos they talk about how their information was confidential and privatized. Investors would ask how it worked and they would say well we cant give you all the details sorry its to protect our secrets.

    • @shelbycurry721
      @shelbycurry721 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      That's what kills me. I think part of it is just bad journalism. You have to ask the real questions and you cant accept answers that are vague and don't get to the heart of the matter. But then people were so hopeful for this technology they suspended their disbelief which is very sad that this woman fooled everyone, invested in spreading unfinished technology instead of trying to actually finish the technology. Ultimately bad people like Elizabeth Holmes are going to make it much harder for people who are willing to go to the lengths to get new technology made because nobody's going to want to believe in them.

    • @JohnP538
      @JohnP538 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Abbott Laboratories has the I-Stat, they spent a decade developing it and a ton of money. It only does something like 12 tests from a sample. Which is coincidentally the total number of tests that Theranos could get to work.

    • @justinsmith1001
      @justinsmith1001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shelbycurry721 Good points about journalism. But, there was no actual technology to finish here. This was a scam from the very beginning.

  • @quantumhed
    @quantumhed 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1604

    It's interesting to hear terms like "self made" and "perseverance" when talking about someone who was born a millionaire. It's like words don't mean anything.

    • @MatameVideos
      @MatameVideos 5 ปีที่แล้ว +206

      Most "Self Made" rich people weren't Self Made at all. They just started business separate from their parents, but still took advantage of all the privileges, education, financial resources AND connections they got from their parents. Rarely any of them were middle class or below.

    • @mrsx7944
      @mrsx7944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      @@MatameVideos Exactly. Calling her self made is a JOKE. Her family came from old OLD money.

    • @DG_na_rien_compris_à_madmax
      @DG_na_rien_compris_à_madmax 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@MatameVideos Yep. It’s probably true for most Billionaires

    • @crosshairs3
      @crosshairs3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Welcome to the real world Randy. It takes money to make money and rags to riches stories are few and far between. You want success? Work hard and you’ll be richer at 60 than you are at 30. Make a good base for your children who can then do the same.

    • @Schixotica
      @Schixotica 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Eh, it about what’s been achieved not any arbitrary starting point. Turning millions of dollars into billions of dollars is arguably as significant or more than someone becoming a millionaire from a lower middle class background. Someone who came from third world poverty would scoff at the “self-made” millionaire that grew up in the first world because they started much lower. Having the attitude that anyone who’s born wealthy’s achievements are worthless or “not fully earned” is a less privileged person’s cope

  • @SharanGNath
    @SharanGNath ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I can understand why you might be shocked by the story of Elizabeth Holmes and her company, Theranos. It's certainly a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked ambition and unethical behavior. You put what I thought in my mind, perfectly into words that make so much sense! All the best on your entrepreneurial journey!

  • @joeguzman3558
    @joeguzman3558 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    She should have been a politician and never got caught Lol

    • @misswinnie4.8
      @misswinnie4.8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look at the Democrats who are trying to keep her out of prison.

  • @rsolsjo
    @rsolsjo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1353

    It's sad that a big reason people wanted to see her succeed is that she was a young, driven woman, and she ended up setting a horrible example for young girls and women.

    • @davekeyser2530
      @davekeyser2530 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Sylvia Scarlett Honestly, if you think one person sets back half the human population, you're part of the problem. SMH

    • @davekeyser2530
      @davekeyser2530 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Sylvia Scarlett So one self made billionaire represents over 4 billion people? Wow, you're more gullible than the investors lol

    • @elliefrederiksen8422
      @elliefrederiksen8422 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      She also used that fact to her advantage…

    • @bruindanzr
      @bruindanzr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      💯

    • @zissler1
      @zissler1 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's why she got so much funding is because people aren't gender blind and have bias. This allowed them to be fooled easier by a con.

  • @Loops-1
    @Loops-1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +972

    She literally doesn't answer ANY question. None. She really does rely on the interviewers lack of knowledge about biomedical science.

    • @mlb6d9
      @mlb6d9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      She's very good at responding to direct questions with a bunch of buzzwords and bamboozling. She should have been a politician, she'd fit right in

    • @jojob285
      @jojob285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      yep, just saying things that will make the other person clueless, makes herself sound smart.

    • @MrRaulstrnad
      @MrRaulstrnad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yeah so where were cbs medical consultants the msm is all hype

    • @mrsx7944
      @mrsx7944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@MrRaulstrnad Exactly. You mean to tell me NO ONE with a biomedical background called her suspicious???

    • @Lulufitdxb
      @Lulufitdxb 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why would she expose it ? So people can copy her idea ?

  • @gringagarbo7508
    @gringagarbo7508 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why does she have that Mark Zuckerberg look in her eyes lol

  • @huh7270
    @huh7270 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This seems ground breaking! Conrats to Holmes she seems very smart and trustworthy and not deceitful at all. Been awhile but Im sure they are just finishing things up in the lab 😊

    • @undigesteddonut
      @undigesteddonut 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      please💀💀

    • @jhopkins213
      @jhopkins213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe they'll let her set up a lab in her cell once she reports to federal prison?

    • @loucipher7782
      @loucipher7782 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      plot twist
      she already finished up in the lab but people sabotaged it
      because you know, that finished product will take money out of too many people's pocket

  • @May04bwu
    @May04bwu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +651

    She dropped out of Stanford after 2 semesters, knows nothing about lab protocols and techniques but you can see her wearing a lab coat. Watch out, this must be a true scientist!

    • @edub9930
      @edub9930 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The media loves that visual. Woman in a labcoat

  • @SuperNovaJinckUFO
    @SuperNovaJinckUFO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1570

    I gotta hand it to her: she's an excellent liar. Every answer she gives not only seems to make sense (despite barely being an answer at all), but also conveniently throws out an idea which feels exciting. It feels straight to the point, but it's actually a misdirection. If anyone's wondering how she managed to manipulate the entire world, that's how

    • @quransunsolicitedopinion5708
      @quransunsolicitedopinion5708 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Misdirection was key for the whole thing. This allowed her to skate on this theory of hers for so many years

    • @ohana-bordi
      @ohana-bordi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      She seems to be a psychopath. She’s an excellent liar for sure.

    • @alexloyola4695
      @alexloyola4695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I don’t know if I’m just less trusting than the average person, but I’ve never walked away from one of her interviews feeling like she had been genuine. On a side note, I remember being in a doctor’s office and seeing her on the cover of a magazine. Something about her just made me uneasy. I read the article and thought, “Oh, wow. Don’t judge a book by its cover.” A few years later, I end reading about the huge scam that Theranos ended up being. Chilling.

    • @gryla5290
      @gryla5290 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      The US is not the whole world. My country never talked about her 😑

    • @theconformist2399
      @theconformist2399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As scummy as it is, she really should’ve just gone into politics. You can’t use deceit & lies to run a tech/medical company (since you do actually need to know wtf you’re doing), but you can certainly lie your way into political office.

  • @gloriousgearhead5367
    @gloriousgearhead5367 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I still can’t believe that media wasn’t at all skeptical about her credibility.

  • @GLamoRousCooKie
    @GLamoRousCooKie ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I didn't follow this story back then but looking at it now, as a doctor, it's absolutely terrifying. How did ANYONE fall for this?!?!

    • @missamae34
      @missamae34 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m a clinical lab tech and I remember driving by Theranos in about 2010…. I work with the instruments that test this blood and I wondered how the heck could’ve 19 year old fake voice dropout come up with some thing that Beckman Coulter and Siemens couldn’t come up with? I smelled something fishy way back then

    • @weirdo1060
      @weirdo1060 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Most people don’t have a medical background. Many of her investors were people with money, but no science knowledge p.

  • @DeepSociety
    @DeepSociety 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1478

    If i was a filmmaker i would hire her for horror movies

    • @jetizon
      @jetizon 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      No joke.. if a movie comes out, I'll be intrigued!

    • @jetizon
      @jetizon 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jorge Arellano Mother of gawd... YES! Just take my money!

    • @thomas9451
      @thomas9451 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Yep, this whole story is incredible and it takes so much dedication, intelligence, acting skills, craziness, cold blood to be committed to such a huge lie for so much time...it's scary. I'm so excited for the movie starring Jennifer Lawrence (PERFECT casting) and with the Big Short's Adam McKay directing...Oscar material.

    • @MegaLonewolf01
      @MegaLonewolf01 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      She is scary

    • @geethanjalibalaji5232
      @geethanjalibalaji5232 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

  • @chrisizme2
    @chrisizme2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2567

    It's going to be tough for Jennifer Lawrence to do her voice when Hollywood makes a movie about her rise and fall.

    • @MotorCityPhoenix313
      @MotorCityPhoenix313 6 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      chrisizme2 yup. Easy casting there

    • @Ben-yj8ye
      @Ben-yj8ye 6 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Mira sorvino should play her 🙂

    • @chrislauderdale9791
      @chrislauderdale9791 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Or Mackenzie Davis, her voice is already at that range.

    • @barnoldwhv
      @barnoldwhv 6 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      Wow, nice prediction.

    • @hello2jello4mellow34
      @hello2jello4mellow34 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They should cast a woman for that role. Just to create a row.

  • @danw9946
    @danw9946 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    2:08 cocaine? Wasn’t expecting to see that lol.

  • @Helmuesi911
    @Helmuesi911 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow, very inspirational.. I really wish this young lady the best in her endeavors and may she prosper with her quest to help people in need.
    Nov. 25, 2022

  • @In-N-Out333
    @In-N-Out333 7 ปีที่แล้ว +858

    Just so everyone knows: You can drop out of Stanford and re-enter whenever you want. My friend dropped out in 1994 and went back in 2005. They're one of the few universities in the country with that policy.

    • @TheSeancassady
      @TheSeancassady 6 ปีที่แล้ว +238

      I don't think Stanford will be taking her back

    • @EdwardAndersen
      @EdwardAndersen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +121

      She is going to federal prison now.

    • @yoana0608
      @yoana0608 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Annony Mouse lmao😂😂😂😂😂

    • @changwanyu4231
      @changwanyu4231 ปีที่แล้ว

      I doubt she can anymore...

    • @Megdracula
      @Megdracula ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheSeancassady the dollar tree might take her

  • @Shahrdad
    @Shahrdad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +825

    How anyone could believe that a college dropout with no medical or biomedical training could come up with medical miracles is beyond me. There really is a sucker born every minute.

    • @ang5035
      @ang5035 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      She also targeted certain investors that are family run and not sophisticated in the way they did their due diligence. The red flag was that there was no investor that specialized in biopharma that invested in theranos

    • @kaucasity
      @kaucasity 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      No b it’s rich yt privilege

    • @annedin896
      @annedin896 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Same reason how people would believe how other billionaire dropout could make it

    • @jackmclean4120
      @jackmclean4120 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great Man Theory + white privilege? They see this confident, young, charismatic white woman in a Steve Jobs jumper and assume that she must be a scientist.

    • @boojiboy2275
      @boojiboy2275 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some very rich suckers with millions to invest.

  • @szk4023
    @szk4023 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    She was never actually a real billionaire. She never had a billion dollars in her bank account. She was on the path of becoming a billionaire because of her company's high valuation. But until an entrepreneur actually gets the opportunity to sell stock for cash, it's not at all accurate to call them a "billionaire". The process of obtaining real money can take years and sometimes it doesn't pan out even when there's no fraud.

  • @hermanpesina6328
    @hermanpesina6328 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm just here looking for comments from the original upload but their all hiding

  • @zanderpander7878
    @zanderpander7878 5 ปีที่แล้ว +533

    It looks like she's trying not to malfunction.

    • @PungiFungi
      @PungiFungi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      There may be a Fembot underneath the mask.

    • @Jaywall1111
      @Jaywall1111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I know there’s something very, very off about her. I thought she was like a clone or under mind control. Lol

    • @MrRaulstrnad
      @MrRaulstrnad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Jaywall1111 but the point is the interviewers should have noticed something was wrong they should have brought in medical professional to provide advice and asked tougher questions in the next round there were so many red flags flying that one would have thought they were attending a chinese communist party congress

    • @gwendolenmccloud8771
      @gwendolenmccloud8771 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very funny. ~ (Chuckle!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

    • @coolguy9709
      @coolguy9709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      She is a female clone of Mark Zuckerberg

  • @ronanrogers4127
    @ronanrogers4127 6 ปีที่แล้ว +707

    “Who says that when they’re 9 years old?”...a 9 year old psychopath

    • @MeiYingLim
      @MeiYingLim 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Agreed.

    • @endofsight9841
      @endofsight9841 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Some people are born mistakes, and she was born a demon.

    • @jacksafereffort516
      @jacksafereffort516 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Maybe someone who at 9 realizes that school (and life) is a bit of a game, and saying something like that gets the teacher on your side forever basically..?

  • @chad5893
    @chad5893 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "So how does it work?"
    Holmes "Nanotubes"

  • @monkeymeat2024
    @monkeymeat2024 5 ปีที่แล้ว +482

    CBS is probably like, "should we leave this up?"

    • @miketheyunggod2534
      @miketheyunggod2534 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Rubén Maldonado why not? They're fake news.

    • @rickroli893
      @rickroli893 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@miketheyunggod2534 are they?

  • @countalucard4226
    @countalucard4226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +518

    Amanda Seyfried has really nailed her character. Incredible acting performance.

    • @stevestarr9769
      @stevestarr9769 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I wasn't impressed when I started watching, but within 5 or 6 episodes I was blown away.

    • @elikajaromi4514
      @elikajaromi4514 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      I just finished that show and i agree. Amanda Seyfried was amazing. Elizabeth holmes’ behavior and demeanor is honestly so annoying and repulsive to me, from her fake deep voice to the way she responds to questions without actually providing truthful answers.
      Amanda did an amazing job portraying her. She’s an amazing actor.

    • @quantummischief9548
      @quantummischief9548 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't help but feel annoyed though that they made a show based on her, seeing how she is an absolute narcissist.

    • @sophialeonardo9778
      @sophialeonardo9778 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@elikajaromi4514 oh really? Now i need to know the title of that movie

    • @maridaaucamp5133
      @maridaaucamp5133 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sophialeonardo9778 The dropout

  • @jayasimhavamsi
    @jayasimhavamsi ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Pioneer, Visionary 😂😂
    Yes she is a visionary in fooling you guys

  • @xavierguzman4812
    @xavierguzman4812 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This video aged like gas station sushi

  • @thetruepatriot7733
    @thetruepatriot7733 2 ปีที่แล้ว +596

    As a female with a naturally deep voice, we don't claim her...

    • @thefashionhoe
      @thefashionhoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      do you know if there are any videos of her natural voice

    • @thetruepatriot7733
      @thetruepatriot7733 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@thefashionhoe there's a few short clips floating around that show her voice change, there on TH-cam.

    • @alexmiller7173
      @alexmiller7173 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thefashionhoe If you watch the video of Elizabeth Holmes on Mad Money talking to Jim Cramer then you will hear her voice change. She starts off with a deep voice saying "first they think you're crazy" but by the end of the video she loses the deep voice and you can hear her natural voice. On the HBO documentary her employees said they thought the deep voice was real until the office party when she drank too much wine and forgot to put on the fake voice.

    • @e.s.2
      @e.s.2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thefashionhoe th-cam.com/video/PjnsYz-xdOI/w-d-xo.html

    • @HipixOFFICIAL
      @HipixOFFICIAL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wtf does that even mean

  • @Redorgreenful
    @Redorgreenful 5 ปีที่แล้ว +330

    “How does it work?”
    “So we got these tubes...” Yes, we have eyes & we can see tubes. But. How. Does. It. Work? What they should have asked.

    • @jamiele9250
      @jamiele9250 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Redcatrobe hahaha yes she is @@

    • @FrankGutowski-ls8jt
      @FrankGutowski-ls8jt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Redcatrobe
      She said in another interview that small tubes enabled testing of small samples.

    • @theroamingsavage8813
      @theroamingsavage8813 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Right?
      "We got some tubes, and dont u hate needles? And when the tests are done they're done, and then the customer will leave and then its done"
      Umm... what?

    • @lauralangham9657
      @lauralangham9657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      everyone just ASSUMED that someone had verified the process and how it works.

    • @pashauzan
      @pashauzan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@theroamingsavage8813 I was like "Where's the part where you're gonna prove how the faster diagnosis work?"

  • @darkhighwayman1757
    @darkhighwayman1757 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    thats gotta be embarrassing looking back. They wanted her to be the bestest girl boss when she was a total phony.

  • @darshanhiremath
    @darshanhiremath ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Manipulation is the powerful weapon in business
    She knew what she was doing

  • @scottfillmore8485
    @scottfillmore8485 8 ปีที่แล้ว +120

    only problem is that this technique does not work...

  • @continuousself-improvement1879
    @continuousself-improvement1879 5 ปีที่แล้ว +811

    I think the media should also be held responsible for their faulty reporting and lazy investigating.

    • @beckydoesit9331
      @beckydoesit9331 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      What are you talking about? The Wall Street Journal did an elaborate piece on Theranos and brought them down.

    • @theroamingsavage8813
      @theroamingsavage8813 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Of course not, she was a "self made FEMALE billionaire", same rules don't apply if u have a vagina, so nobody really sat down and grilled her proper when she side steps EVERY question posed to her lol

    • @ts121084
      @ts121084 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No due diligence. NONE.

    • @michaelbarbarich3965
      @michaelbarbarich3965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@theroamingsavage8813 yeah, like that horrible woman Bernie Madoff

    • @PungiFungi
      @PungiFungi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@beckydoesit9331 let’s not pretend for a moment the media didn’t built and hyped her up... all too eager with this female empowerment / breaking the glass ceiling nonsense. And they still haven’t learned.

  • @metaforcesaber
    @metaforcesaber 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Her whole business was built on her flirting with old men to get their money, and talking in her "deep voice." lolol

  • @santileonsteinberg1441
    @santileonsteinberg1441 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    well this aged beautifully

  • @sbkpilot1
    @sbkpilot1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +452

    what's odd about her demeanor is that I think she actually believes she is a visionary even thought some part of her brain probably knows it's all a fraud, perhaps some kind of split personality disorder.

    • @jayc9179
      @jayc9179 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bwahaha 👍🤯

    • @LegendaryMel
      @LegendaryMel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Probably a narcissist

    • @moisemensah8233
      @moisemensah8233 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      She's a real-life Alfred Wesker

    • @anitahasani5506
      @anitahasani5506 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Or maybe that’s just her being narcissistic and believing herself to be special even though she knows what she is saying is not true , but she is determined to make a fool all of us and to hold her fake image up

    • @Winter8555
      @Winter8555 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The fitting definition is 'self deception'

  • @alekkacosmos9807
    @alekkacosmos9807 9 ปีที่แล้ว +186

    She didn't answer the question about if it drew enough blood for several tests.

    • @llyg4848
      @llyg4848 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Because it she didn’t have the medical background to be able to answer that, which is why it’s now under

    • @ostensibly531
      @ostensibly531 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Glad to see you sane before they caught her.

    • @noahsmith2555
      @noahsmith2555 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      lol well done, you aren’t a sheep.

    • @LoveLaw
      @LoveLaw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And she still hasn’t 😂

    • @brightdaysaheadofUs
      @brightdaysaheadofUs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And the interviewer didnt press for answer

  • @kingkongchief1177
    @kingkongchief1177 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I bet she watched that episode of SpongeBob where he’s selling chocolate and conning customers saying it does this does that and and she thought “I can do that too but with blood”

  • @nolanolivier6791
    @nolanolivier6791 5 ปีที่แล้ว +773

    The comment section is gold; amazing how many viewers could clock the fact that holmes was a sociopathic fraud - and were proven right.
    Or maybe it was just the awful eyeliner, cheesy turtlenecks and phony baritone.

    • @MeiYingLim
      @MeiYingLim 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      She is a psychopath. I have met another psychopath from harvard in 2013. Who doesn't blink too.

    • @phamkelly9
      @phamkelly9 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      yea but why are most of them edited LMAO

    • @ronniemead805
      @ronniemead805 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      She wanted to be just like steve jobs; so she dressed and adopted deep baritone just like her idol.

    • @gabrielgonzales5907
      @gabrielgonzales5907 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Really?....all I've noticed is people seeing with 20/20 hindsight: "Those fools!!!....I would never have been fooled by her myself!!!!"

    • @PungiFungi
      @PungiFungi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How can you trust anybody who cannot even speak with their real voice.

  • @ticket67
    @ticket67 7 ปีที่แล้ว +645

    "We've created these little tiny tubes" ... lol... that's about all they created :) congratulations!

    • @VijayNinel
      @VijayNinel 6 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      Actually they didnt invent the tiny tube. The 'microtainer' was invented in 1976. Theranos just renanmed it to 'nanotainer'.

    • @Tubebrerry
      @Tubebrerry 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They created you tubes.

    • @BigEightiesNewWave
      @BigEightiesNewWave 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      pipettes already exist for blood draws.

    • @EmeraldView
      @EmeraldView 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Hey have you EVER seen tubes that tiny!
      That's pretty impressive!
      The only reason blood tests require so much blood, is because the damn tubes were so big!

    • @aquilaaltaire3007
      @aquilaaltaire3007 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EmeraldView Yes. Companies sell them to science labs on the daily. I'm holding one right now. It's pink. :)

  • @treylearns634
    @treylearns634 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That 👁 contact she’s giving me is frightening

  • @raulduke7142
    @raulduke7142 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When the adderall has taken over the brain. Pure psycho.

  • @cervacio
    @cervacio 9 ปีที่แล้ว +296

    To be fair some of the medical experts have doubts on her claims, especially since she hasn't disclosed how her company can pull it off.

    • @beluga101
      @beluga101 9 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      cervacio her tech is not FDA approved. how does she get around it? she runs it all through her own company.

    • @WallStwizkid
      @WallStwizkid 9 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      cervacio I also read an article about real scientists having many concerns about her process. I was skeptical from the beginning when I found out she was a drop out with no research experience.

    • @beluga101
      @beluga101 9 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      ***** thats a bunch of crap. its not that hard to replicate her process, its basic, every lab in the world does the things her company does. its routine. but the difference is labs wont do a cbc off of just a fingerstick. thats irresponsible. you cantget enough info from the blood from your peripheral veins compared to your venous veins.
      her billion dollar company is based off of good marketing. she happened to make her lab in silicon valley and sprout forward.

    • @WallStwizkid
      @WallStwizkid 9 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Tony Abraham That's funny, because I didn't mention any details. You clearly have a very surface level (if you can even call it that) understanding of what her company does. All the technical details of her 'innovation' are kept secret -- so you know nothing. What I was referring to is the application of 'microfluidics' and specifically how the technology works. A big part of the process is publishing these results for review, and her company has published nothing. Experts are suspicious -- there is no question about that.
      "thats a bunch of crap."
      lol. Learn how to talk like a grownup.

    • @beluga101
      @beluga101 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ***** pms? wtf is wrong with our society to end up making a bunch of panies. i didnt ask for any "details" from you.. so dont worry about it lol.. geez u act like ur her autobiographer or something.
      anyways i work in a lab too, we do the same exact thing as she does but broader. we recieve finger sticks from collectors in microcontainers. we run cbcs etc on them. u can make that into a poc machine and cut out the middle man. its a bit risky to do so bc blood tubes, (drawn through a needle are better), actual blood results are different. so her company is a farse. its just good marketing.

  • @marionoatrach
    @marionoatrach 6 ปีที่แล้ว +400

    "So how does it work?" the interviewer asks. "Little tiny tubes." No further questions about the technology? Just tiny tubes?

    • @kostasperperidis100
      @kostasperperidis100 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Marion Ostrach exactly my thought. One of the many central questions would be, how can a sample that small suffice for the wide range of diagnostics she promises. Further, how reliable would the results be. And many many more.

    • @theespatier4456
      @theespatier4456 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Marion Ostrach The reporter DID ask several follow up questions.

    • @pamelamls
      @pamelamls 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Interviewer didnt ask important questions like what type of machine was being used to test the blood

    • @theespatier4456
      @theespatier4456 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pamela Marie No point in asking for what... the name?... of a machine they made.

    • @pamelamls
      @pamelamls 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@theespatier4456 Not asking for the "name" of the machine, but ask how does the machine work, explain about the process, what type of diseases does it test, ect. Interviewer asked no relevant questions.

  • @mynameisnotjerome1803
    @mynameisnotjerome1803 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This aged well.

  • @outlawedmedia4336
    @outlawedmedia4336 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This aged like a 7 year old milk left out of the fridge.

  • @tangofoxtrot40
    @tangofoxtrot40 2 ปีที่แล้ว +465

    I work in healthcare and the first time I heard about this, my reaction was a mix of amazement and fear. 10% amazed at the idea and 90% being fear as I knew this was never gonna work.

    • @mabelw7
      @mabelw7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      100%not gonna work its scientifically not possible what she is suggesting

    • @amazon2.022
      @amazon2.022 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      how do you know? I would like to have your opinion as a healthcare professional

    • @Jensth
      @Jensth ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@amazon2.022 because she claimed to be able to fit analytical equipment that normally take up the space of a minor factory hall into a tiny PC-sized cabinet. The different analytical equipments interfere with each other if placed closely together. Electromagnetic and light interferences from sensors will distort the signal and lead to inaccurate measurements. Plus; making 250 different analyses from such a tiny amount of blood would require the samples to be massively diluted, which again reduces precision. So yes, from a technological standpoint, her product was impossible with current day technology. She would have had to invent entirely new ways of doing testing in each of these 250 biological markers. Completely unrealistic.

    • @set65
      @set65 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I went to the blood draw and asked the phlebotomist if this was possible and they laughed and said from the moment they heard about it they knew it was impossible. So I wonder if the people who invested even think to ask the blood draw people like I did?

    • @micahwilliams1219
      @micahwilliams1219 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@set65 don’t y’all get it? No? We’ll maybe you will one day, unless you’re white then you problem won’t understand.

  • @luxurylifela4559
    @luxurylifela4559 2 ปีที่แล้ว +676

    Elizabeth’s case is a classic example of the phrase “it’s easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled”. I think Elizabeth came in at just the right time. People were making the unimaginable happen in tech and she was able to ride that wave. Then, once these intelligent and prominent people had jumped on the band wagon, they had to keep believing in her rather than admit to themselves and the world that they had been fooled. It’s also true that sometimes you’re a hero or a villain based upon the outcome. If Holmes had done things exactly as she had but by some happy accident her tech had worked, I wonder how this story would have been framed. Is our real problem with Holmes all of the unethical behavior or simply that she failed?

    • @erinelizabeth8180
      @erinelizabeth8180 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Very interesting point

    • @corksterx1
      @corksterx1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Her tech was never going to work - the core issue is definitively that she lied to investors, falsified information, and defrauded people. In her soft defense, the fact that investors handed over insane amounts of money with little to no diligence or fact finding on their end is insane - she took extreme advantage of the fact that people "trusted" her in the age of innovation. She is a straight up criminal, but people essentially allowed her to become a criminal so that is also on them.

    • @SP-qi8ur
      @SP-qi8ur 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Insightful take

    • @rockychang7595
      @rockychang7595 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@corksterx1 that core issue exists with many tech companies that eventually became successful as well, but you don’t hear about it because they were successful. The fake it till you make it can go two ways. Look at the tech sector with so many companies/startups that don’t turn a profit.

    • @donn.4766
      @donn.4766 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@rockychang7595 the difference is she knew it didn’t work and still told people it did, and taking their money. Tech companies do the same, but they can hide behind the guise of it being new technology. Medicine however is different because it deals with peoples lives, lying about a treatment that you know doesn’t work is not the same as inventing new technology and asking for investor money to get it pushed out.

  • @ibrahimdayub3276
    @ibrahimdayub3276 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Having worked with toxic “start up entrepreneurs” before, her behavior is much much more than common. It’s disgusting how theses types of people can influence others 🤢

    • @loucipher7782
      @loucipher7782 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yup there are tons of them now especially from america
      confident and clueless talking big

  • @doge2899
    @doge2899 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What’s the biggest crime? Whatever Elizabeth did or Norah naively gushing over this obvious nutcase.

  • @firmansyafei7763
    @firmansyafei7763 9 ปีที่แล้ว +558

    she look tense, her eyes almost never blink.

    • @juanjeremy2012
      @juanjeremy2012 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      +Firman Syafei she loves the attention and the adulation but the chickens are starting to come home to roost, shes got nothing to show after ten years

    • @4EverDubin
      @4EverDubin 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +juanjeremy2012 Actually you fell for the PR, see this is sort of a PR campaign to make her well known. So the critics criticizing her that you fell for is pretty much her design to be mentioned in the likes of Steve Jobs and the like. She has been behind the scene for a long time reaping in billions. Now she is self-promoting herself. You need praise AND haters. ;D

    • @juanjeremy2012
      @juanjeremy2012 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ~ShiftR0ck~
      NO U NEED WORKING PRODUCTS, WHICH SHE DOESNT HAVE. IF U THINK SHES SO GREAT ILL LET U POP HER CHERRY

    • @juanjeremy2012
      @juanjeremy2012 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      ~ShiftR0ck~
      WHAT SUCCESS? AT SCAMMING PEOPLE?

    • @4EverDubin
      @4EverDubin 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      juanjeremy2012 You have proof you deluded fool?!

  • @bcm3938
    @bcm3938 7 ปีที่แล้ว +173

    2:16 Didnt answer the question, that was the reveal right there

    • @raym.778
      @raym.778 6 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      BC M And as she was responding she didn't blink almost as if she was trying hard to gauge whether the interviewer was buying her response.

    • @kerryobrien6110
      @kerryobrien6110 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yep, no answer.

  • @v_iancu
    @v_iancu ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:16 "Healthcare is the leading cause of bankruptcy"
    *chokes*

  • @86sineadw
    @86sineadw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can remember when I first saw Elizabeth Holmes I thought to myself that there was something wrong with her. No one 'normal' has eyes that wide, without blinking, all the time.

  • @queenkey6002
    @queenkey6002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +390

    How did people not know her voice was fake 😂 It literally sounds like when they distort voices on videos to hide the person's identity.

    • @oceanbreeze1897
      @oceanbreeze1897 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      She was hiding something for sure. Lol. Idk...I fell for it and just thought she had a really low voice.

    • @cluelesscastelino150
      @cluelesscastelino150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I'm Batman (in deep voice )

    • @silloweet
      @silloweet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I would never guess anybody fakes that

    • @TriniGamerGirl7
      @TriniGamerGirl7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes! 🤣🤣🤣

    • @loveleighfiji
      @loveleighfiji 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      💯

  • @mywong2411
    @mywong2411 4 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    It's funny that she didn't achieve anything solid, but the media portrayed her as some famous successful celebrity. Don't they know of this saying, "Don't count your chickens before they hatch?"

    • @mrsx7944
      @mrsx7944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      They wanted it to be true. A female billionaire from silicon valley.

  • @11lucygoosey
    @11lucygoosey ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This didn't age well 🙄

  • @saintetienne755
    @saintetienne755 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The fact that she thought she'd get away with it is astounding

  • @paulinekim6455
    @paulinekim6455 5 ปีที่แล้ว +610

    After following through all of her interviews, I noticed her bizarre behaviors; she turned totally red whenever she was asked about her technologies and she actually had to explain about that. In addtiotion, she turned away her eyes from interviewers. All these are typical behaviors people show when they are lying. Her voice souned much less compelling and determined than in situations where she talked about her (mythical) vision, (fake) conviction, (hilarious) motivation, passion (gambling) for healthcare, and her then-status as the youngest self-made female billionaire etc. She should have chosen her career in politics, gambling, marketing or something. She could have been something.

    • @eovecka
      @eovecka 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      Very astute assessment! And agreed she would’ve thrived as a politician- she has no soul!

    • @jax24356
      @jax24356 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Yep, and she is choosing her words very carefully, overthinking. Her super wide eyes, and the way she is trying too hard with everything. She doesn't even sound like she can breathe properly. There is such a creepy vibe from her like something is way off.

    • @mabelw7
      @mabelw7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup careers posdible without knowledge

    • @shio5186
      @shio5186 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      So true
      She should have become a politician

    • @bansheeofinisheerin
      @bansheeofinisheerin ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry but “body language” analyses are meaningless, so your comment doesnt have any value.

  • @azimuth361
    @azimuth361 4 ปีที่แล้ว +800

    It's actually pretty impressive that she built a $9,000,000,000 company. If she had done half of that honestly, she would still be a top entrepeneur.

    • @aus3492
      @aus3492 2 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      And now she's going to jail.

    • @DJSt3rling
      @DJSt3rling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      smoke and mirrors baby. She scammed her way to the top & then got caught with her pants down. Sucks because she probably inspired a lot of young women to be great.

    • @Southpaw101
      @Southpaw101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@DJSt3rling inspired? Thief is a thief

    • @tech9803
      @tech9803 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      If she'd done it honestly it never would have been worth $9b.

    • @ismith8053
      @ismith8053 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yeah but thats like robbing 10 banks and saying "oh I could have robbed 5 honestly".

  • @scarletbegonias2359
    @scarletbegonias2359 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    She gets pregnant twice to avoid jail, what a true narcissist

  • @Keshly16
    @Keshly16 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I mean she didn't mean to scam them. She seemed like she actually believed this would work. They decided to invest in the product.

  • @threeone6012
    @threeone6012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    "If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you do read it, you're misinformed."
    -- Mark Twain

  • @SPQRCincinnatus
    @SPQRCincinnatus 8 ปีที่แล้ว +452

    She is Milli Vanilli of Biotech. LOL

    • @Aryanbrotherhoodboxing
      @Aryanbrotherhoodboxing 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Love it!

    • @1124663
      @1124663 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      SPQRCincinnatus 😂

    • @utah658
      @utah658 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The difference is that Milli Vanilli were able to prove themselves that they are capable of where as, Elizabeth Holmes is just another sorta like a Bernie Madoff. Web of lies until she got caught. Luckily the government hadn’t lay their boots down on her and if they do, then she is gonna get some prison time.

    • @cesiumbob7278
      @cesiumbob7278 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      “Girl, you know it’s true, Lizzy’s blood testing works for you”. Lol

    • @smurf6901
      @smurf6901 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao

  • @trae_the_Arrogant89
    @trae_the_Arrogant89 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If she were a black woman she'd be laughed out of existence... I'ma leave it at that

  • @iantempleton313
    @iantempleton313 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is so surreal to watch in 2024

  • @FoneArc
    @FoneArc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +159

    @4:13 - She says her dad was moving the family to Texas. What the story doesn’t mention is that he was moving to Houston, Texas to take the job as VP of Enron.

    • @jayc9179
      @jayc9179 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Omg, runs in the family.
      That should have drawn a red flag immediately 🤬

  • @FreedomForever2010
    @FreedomForever2010 6 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    *former billionaire.
    Indicted today.

  • @sporadics
    @sporadics 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What's the purpose of leaving this video up?

  • @mariej6962
    @mariej6962 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you cannot confrotably hold a specimen container means that container isn't safe to use. I am confused how she managed to get through so many medical errors.

  • @Billyboy939
    @Billyboy939 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Her dad worked for Enron. She knew a good scam when she saw one.

  • @robg5161
    @robg5161 2 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    “Little is known about how Theranos test work”
    Pretty much the thoughts of everyone who worked on the project.

  • @utubesanjay
    @utubesanjay ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @1:15 HealthCare is the leading cause of Bankruptcy! LOL.

  • @dannydark1452
    @dannydark1452 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I Haven't even heard of her or any of this until the Hulu original series with Amanda Seyfried lol

  • @rationalistfaith
    @rationalistfaith 8 ปีที่แล้ว +289

    She tries way too hard to be Steve Jobs.

    • @mohamedfahad2364
      @mohamedfahad2364 8 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      +Rationalist Faith but at the end of the she is a fraud!

    • @rationalistfaith
      @rationalistfaith 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      FAHAD Mohamed Most females these days ;). Welcome to the Matriarchy, where subjectivity trump objectivity.

    • @thequake180
      @thequake180 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You mean Steve Con Jobs?

    • @anithasuresh8938
      @anithasuresh8938 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thequake180 at least he didn't take people's lives like this psychopath

    • @mrsx7944
      @mrsx7944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rationalistfaith he's her idol

  • @sehrzeb9485
    @sehrzeb9485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    "What kind of nine year old writes a letter like that" ONLY nine year olds write such things.
    The glow and beam on her face to hear her ill informed praises being sung is genuinely revolting.

    • @PungiFungi
      @PungiFungi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I think that hifalutin letter was manufactured for one of her stock stories. She didn’t write that at 9.

    • @sehrzeb9485
      @sehrzeb9485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PungiFungi this crossed my mind too. Like I said repugnant, unconscionable as all get out.

    • @loucipher7782
      @loucipher7782 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      literally every kid and parent does the same thing
      lets not kid ourself or feel revolt, you will do the same too

  • @MissouriBirds
    @MissouriBirds ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The guy at the very end looks so unimpressed. He was onto her 😂