What photographers aren't telling you about "low light" photography
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มิ.ย. 2024
- What do you think??? 10x the camera, 10x better images?
♦︎Check out OBSbot here! There is a huge Black Friday sale coming for £100 off:
👀Amazon: geni.us/uP1ASp6
📸Official Obsbot website: geni.us/p9FOM8
♦︎Discount code! (works on either site): OBSBOTTINY2
UK link to the OBSbot store: www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0C3B6ZR1...
▾ ▿ ▾ ▿ ▾ ▿ ▾
All photos edited with my Custom Presets: www.microfournerds.com/lightr...
Find used cameras here!
MPB UK: geni.us/ST2V
MPB US: geni.us/STZ48b5
MPB EU: geni.us/dOkLk0z
OM1 on Amazon: geni.us/fkGkl
#MicroFourNerds #lowlightphotography #obsbot #obsbot_Tiny2 #obsbot #blackfriday
@OBSBOT
▾ ▿ ▾ ▿ ▾ ▿ ▾
Timestamps:
00:00 What is the challenge?!
01:12 Test One!
01:45 what lens I'm using (and why it matters)
02:20 Test Two!
02:50 What shutter speed (and how!)
04:40 Test Three!
05:11 How to protect your highlights (and why!)
06:05 Test Four!
06:40 Obsbot sponsor
08:29 is low light a LIE?!
09:28 Test Five!
09:54 low light tip
10:50 How to shoot RAIN
11:56 so which camera did the best?
(Some links in the description are Amazon affiliate links. If you choose to buy using them, I get a small commission at no cost to you.)
▶︎ My Instagram is @emilymaylowrey : geni.us/iEGHxrQ
▾ ▿ ▾ ▿ ▾ ▿ ▾
🤓 Nerds Facebook Group: geni.us/G0iUofA - แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต
The image quality was a lot close than I thought it would be! Do you have any low light photography tips that I might have missed?
What is the software you use to edit the pictures in this video?
@@elzafir just Adobe Lightroom 😊
@@MicroFourNerds noted
The truth is that the 16megapixel sensors were great, I have plenty of awesome night pics shot with my (now sold) em10.2; the lower pixel count in low light becomes a blessing
if you were in the market for a micro 4/3 say the gh6, would you maybe hold off for a few weeks ? i hear there is a fancy new one ocoming soon thats 7 times better ;)
"Buy cheap cameras and go and have fun" that's the best advise in all of the internet.
After 30 years in photography (professionally) I can 100% agree with everything you have said regarding low-light
photography . A superb video on the subject.
Love the blind test :) I was surprised I picked the EM5 every single time! I'm clearly a fan of vibrant warm rather than colder blue tones straight out of camera.
Same here: every single time
Me too, and I have the OM1…🤣
Same. Preferred every time!
I feel like the OG EM5 is one of those special cameras like the Leica M9
E-M5 has by default setting enabled "Keep warm colors" that can be found in White Balance settings.
Disable that and you get WB set to neutral white.
A modern proverb I heard somewhere on a photo blog: "Amatures worry about sensor and the newest camera body, pros worry about galss, but masters only think about how to add lighting".
When you see how well the EM5 did... just shows you can have some serious photography power for not a lot of money. Arguably the it's one of the best times to get into Photography.
Can't watch this vid without appreciating how well you know the ins and outs of your autofocus! Great work!
Tip 5 for handheld .. multishot. It’s a variation on the two second timer, but is generally useful for when the shutter speed drops lower. I always shoot with it enabled. If each shot is delayed more than usual, this is a handy prompt that the shutter speed is low.
Great video! I appreciate the detailed comparison between the EM5 and OM1. also, I had no idea webcams could be this exciting. The Obsbot Tiny Two sounds like a fantastic addition to any content creator's toolkit:)
Just to say thank you for very helpful videos, including this one. As I struggle to sleep at night, I use the time to watch videos, and yours are always illuminating and pleasant to watch. Thanks!
This was an excellent video. I've literally shot thousands of photographs, at night (or indoors under low light) with both of those cameras, and won a few awards with both. You're absolutely right in that the E-M5 mk1 can capture some amazing low light images. But, if you are planning on printing anything larger than 11x14," noise begins to be noticeable around ISO 1600 on the E-M5; the OM-1 delivers about the same amount of noise somewhere between ISO 3200-6400, plus, the dynamic range has been improved quite a bit. Also, the in-body image stabilization is markedly better on the OM-1, allowing for longer exposures without noticeable blurring from hand shake--something which can be critical with street photography when you're trying to snag something which has suddenly happened. But the most critical advance made with the OM-1 over the E-M5 mk1, is the speed and accuracy of the autofocus in low light. Unfortunately, I can't rely on my own eyes to manually focus a shot any more, so I must rely on whatever camera's autofocus capabilities that I'm using. In low light, the original E-M5 was often painfully slow to focus when the light was really dim. The OM-1 is in a different league all together in this regard. I'm grateful that I can afford the OM-1 (though I'm not burdened with your hefty VAT), but someone with less means could do very well with a good minimally used E-M5 mk1, shooting at night with the right lens--I did. BTW, the P/L 25mm f/1.4 was my go-to lens on that camera as well.
Illuminating video, as always. Nice ST line thrown in there!
I’ve only just stumbled across your channel and it’s great. I love your editing and you have a great personality. You make boring camera reviews very interesting and watchable 😅 thank you for your content!
great one again!
special thanks for the rain framerates!
On holding your breath: As a former singer (can prove it: search for my name and "sound of silence" - since you quoted that song :) i got aware that i intuitively hold my breath to stand still. it reduces the shakes but can cause some jitter. instead i tried it the singer-way: let the exhalation release the action
you might get a bit more "slow flowing wobble" but less jitter:
1. breath normally till you "know what you are after", then
2. inhale deeply and aware of the fresh air you have now
3. your body will initiate exhale at an optimum
4. ask your lungs to press the shutter
5. watch and marvel
It is always shocking how confident this body is if "I don't MIND"
Love your channel - always interesting, always entertaining, always informative.
I love the energy first of all! Everything else is awesome. And yea, grading! Beautiful. Ok, let me continue watching the video :D
Hi Emily, this is a fantastic video! You cover some really important aspects that in a way strip the cameras of their age entirely and pit them against each other in the purest sense. Plus, really great tips for anyone that dispels the fear of "low light" AND... you include really catchy tunes. Thank so much!
Fantastic video - I love a good "guess which is which" video! and I got most of them wrong! 😂 Definitely thought the older camera had better colours and was warmer. I also really liked your edits - I think that made all the pictures really shine!
I've been really enjoying this channel. Thanks for another fantastic video.
Keep making videos! really enjoy them!
“Hello Darkness, My old Friend” Nice musical link 😂😂😂
Big thank you! I recently picked up the OM-D E m5 and I had my doubts. This review/demo and your top 10 #1 video have changed my mind.
Great video. Makes me and my brand new camera feel a bit silly. You’re an inspiration. love your photographs no matter what camera you shoot, however expensive, or dinky, or spray painted.
Hi Emily, I enjoyed your vlog. I found great tips from it
This wasn't really the question you asked, but I just went for the pics I liked best out of the two choices. Each time I preferred the EM5 bar one. I did attempt one guess as to which was the OM1. I got that wrong 😅 Great pics, tips and of course great video 😊
Hmm! Thats actually a really interesting point! Is there something inherently more pleasing (maybe nostalgic?) About the older images !
Me too, At some point I just knew and accepted, that I prefer the 200€ camera pictures. Not for the nostalgic feeling, but because I thought they were better looking (mostly), at least in a youtube video. I'm sure if I looked at the RAWs and tried to process them, I'd prefer the newer model.
The OM1 had better highlight detail and colour rendition.
I randomly clicked on this. The rain tip alone was worth the view, very nice, something I'll remember.
This was a great vid. I guessed wrong most of the time. I think because it _looked_ like the OM5 was dealing better with blown-out highlights. I use a 10+ year old camera mostly, so this was a good reminder. I consider myself quite well versed in camera technique knowledge (whether or not I always apply it in the moment) but you taught me a couple of things I didn't know.
I love how you teach us with your videos. Hope to learn more from you. Subscribed!
I like watching your videos. So simple about photography!
Loved the Liverpool shots ❤ Hits different, coz I've been to the city myself. Crazy but lovely city indeed 🎉
I thought I guessed them right, but after the first half of the video, things changed and couldn’t tell which was which properly. Awesome challenge, would love to see more of them!
You are absolutely right! Nowadays, I am shooting most of my phots with my S23 Ultra...and it's a lot of fun!😉
Thanks for sharing your insights on low light photography. I'll definitely try some of these techniques with my camera. btw The Obsbot Tiny 2;s tracking ability seems amazing
Nicely done! You've really illustrated how it's how you use the camera than how great the specs are in cameras! This really supports the notion of spending on glass rather than bodies when GAS hits!
I think that's a great takeaway! Glass is king! 😁📷
@@MicroFourNerds The aphorism is you date the body but marry the lens.
Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)
As for the test, I couldn’t find one that I preferred over the other! I have an E-M1 and an E-M10 mk2 and I love them, so that might be why 😅 great video for alleviating GAS during the barrage of sales during Black Friday/November
Nice video, interesting comparison, and low light tips.
Great video. Thanks, Emily. The points you made get talked about a lot, but are rarely demonstrated. That said, the OM1 clearly made better final images, but it was good to see the EM5mk1 holding its own. But I'm sure the OM1's RAWs provided quite a bit more latitude for postprocessing, which is important in its own way.
Makes me appreciate my E-M5 mk II even more! Those E-M5 shots were great!
Amazing video !! love it
Love your videos and the joyous energy. Watching on a tablet it was pretty impossible to decide, and also, no-one in reality will see two versions of any shot you took, and if the snap is compelling enough, no-one will care.
At the scale of Social Media it's always difficult to tell. It always seems to come down to what the intented use for the images are. While I could pick out the right camera in most of your shots, I am certain that the RAW image, enlarged for printing would really show the difference. Once again, your point is well made. Buy cheap, have fun and unless you're selling beautiful hi res landscape photos or doing product photography it won't matter. There's something for everyone nowadays. It would be interesting to start one's YT channel with as inexpensive camera as possible and succeed because of your personality and what you have to say to the world. Your videos and professionalism have increased exponentially in quality over the past year or so. Don't stop. Thanks.
Another tip for hand-held long exposures, set to high-speed burst and hold the shutter down for a bit. Then in post you can select whichever of the 10 frames was sharpest - even if you're moving a bit, usually there'll be a couple that are sharp, and because you're holding the shutter most of the images won't be affected by the movement of your finger.
Nice work. Appreciate your video work and your FB group.
That was awesome and extremely informative. Was contemplating upgrading my SL3 to the R series but I figured out there's still life in my lady. It all ends up to clever shooting and Lightroom.
I honestly preferred the older camera’s images for almost every shot except for 1. I’m still shooting with my Fuji xt2 for professional headshots.
I found I picked the EM5 most of the time, only occasionally the OM 1! Thanks for this enlightening video, Emily🇦🇺
Pretty consistently picked the EM5, very surprised! Great video. Goes to show how much is down to how you use the tools you have and not how expensive or cutting edge they happen to be.
I absolutely love this test you did a brilliant job! Shout out to the EM5. I love seeing older cameras delivering the good.
I drift around TH-cam watching photography professionals, you managed to keep my attention to the end of the video 👍 very informative and well presented.
the Editing you did one them is Nuts I really like it.
Thanks for creating m4/3s content, subbed. I stumbled across it looking at reviews on stuff
Great video. I ended up selecting the EM5 shots every time in your tests. 🙂
A friend told me to watch your videos after wanting to get into more budget friendly photography (I shot on Sony Full frame until recently, which I sold recently for funding another hobby) and honestly this is a fantastic channel. Very well delivered content! Thank you! Subscribed 😁
Thank you, and your friend! ☺️
Based on your great little video on your EM5, I went looking for an OM-D bargain as an everyday carry. I've just bought an E-M10 ii plus two lenses for under £350! (the extra lens was a bonus). After this video, I can't wait to go out and have some fun.
Great video Emily, both cameras are capable of great shots. What matters more is subject, composition and "soul" of the image. As Cartier-Bresson said "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept”. I'd much rather look at a less than sharp image that makes me feel something than a tac-sharp ultimately boring or cliché photo.
I picked the EM5 in every shot. What a great video and this changed my mind about newer cameras. I’m done buying hoping it will be better, now I will go with fun factor over new sensors.Thanks
Great low light tips, framed in an interesting comparison of the two cameras. (I could mostly guess which was which, but the quality of the low priced camera was quite good.)
The EM5 I was just the thing when I wanted an inexpensive mirrorless. Still selling for about $200, it's a terrific value and a very solid performer. I'm planning on acquiring an EM1 II one of these days (c $500), but cannot justify the cost of the new OM1.
Thanks! I have followed you for a while, and I've enjoyed every episode that I've watched. I do have a question: I mostly use bridge cameras, & I was considering a move to m4/3...is there a good starting point for used gear? Should I be looking for Panasonic or Olympus? Any help you could give would be great. You seem like a true expert. I live in the US (Arizona), which is dry & dusty until monsoon season, when things flood, so good weather sealing is a must.
Thanks in advance!
Steve Bradley
Great explainer, better advice than most big channels without the ego :) subscribed :)
Really enjoyed that, I consistently got it wrong every single time.
Preferred the look of the cheaper camera in every comparison.
Guess there's no need for me to be buying an expensive camera any time soon.
I have the Em5 and the Sony A7III the image difference is staggering when used in an environment like a pub or music event. But during the day it’s not that much different ❤ m4/3 are lighter and easier to carry around + the colours the Oly makes are smoother and more pleasing.
I sold my A7iii years ago. Just fired up my PC the other night and god damn the portraits on the Sony were incredible.
Subscribed! 😊 Now I'm curious about Olympus cameras, the oldest most used camera that I own was the fujifilm xt1. Couldn't agree more with you, your knowledge as a photographer comes first and the rest comes second.
This was a great video. I was able to tell all but 2 images you provided that was from the cheaper and the more expensive camera. TThe two that was missed was from missed/out of focusing. The dynamic range of the newer camera is very noticeable (in RAW of course), although in your edits, the sharpness made the difference since it was very noticeable between the two. But with that said, most people are not looking at photos on a large screen nor do they have them blown up and displayed on the wall. Everything looks great on a small screen. So, a cheap $200 camera is more than enough. Most people even ditched the camera altogether and rely on their camera phones, who now have crazy low f-stops. But as you said, its fun and there is no real need for the most expensive gear if you learn the proper fundamentals in shooting. Great advice and looking forward to more. You have a new subscriber!!
A great comparison and fantastic the way the way the EM5 did.
I completely agree with the way you tackle lowlight. For holidays I use the compact Panasonic G90 or sometimes even the Gm1. The excellent IBIS indeed makes it possible to take excellent night shots handheld with a low shutter speed. And the new noise reduction in Lightroom also produces better results. I also photograph indoor events, parties and concerts, with more movement than with city shots. Then I notice that my SonyA3 with light-sensitive lens produces much less noise and also better color reproduction than my MFT cameras.
Great points! Thanks for highlighting the sensor size debate. I have a TG5 that has been accused of being my Somy Full frame. 😅. And I secretly shoot APSC sometimes . Thanks again.
Ha I love that! I had the TG1 a while back and bloody loved it!
I love your video. It is always a real pleasure to follow you. You enjoy my day.
The higher dynamic range makes a visible difference. I once did a low-light shoot with E-M5II (mine) and E-M1II (borrowed), and not only resolution/detail and noise were visibly different - but especially highlight-retention was much better with the E-M1II (an all-around capable camera, so I would possibly look for a used one if I'll need a new camera). YT can't show it, but watching full-screen on a 4K display already does (no pixel-peeping necessary, not for the noise, not for the highlight retention, maybe for resolution/detail).
Using the viewfinder is a much stabler position for handheld in low light. I've found not holding my breath, but breathing out as I take the photo is good for avoiding camera shake. The other thing I do when doing handheld shots at night is set my camera to a high frame rate and take a burst of photos and I usually will get a few which don't have shake. However what you can get with a tripod and low iso at night is always much better. Actually often I shoot at night with a high-end point and shoot (like Nikon P series or Canon G series) and a light weight tripod and get very good results.
This is a great kind of question to ask. One potential difficulty here, though, is simply that these images are significantly reduced in size to fit in a video frame (or, when viewing side-by-side, half of one) and then on top of that compressed into a lossy video codec for TH-cam. And then resized again during playback to fit in whatever portion of whatever screen is being used to view them. It's a neat side-by-side thing to compare, but evaluating stills in a video is really difficult to do effectively because so much data is lost, and in particular resizing downward from original resolution is going to cut back on the visible noise. Would be interesting to see the original shots posted as jpegs on a web page rather than in a video, which would make for a much more clear comparison.
Managed to guess most correctly although I did start to doubt my self when the edited photos came on screen. I have just picked up a EM5, my main body is an Em1 mk3 I got the 5 mainly as a carry around when not wanting to take my main gear looking forward to using a bit more for night time in the city.
Hi, great video, I almost always went for the cheapest camera 😅
I'm in the process of buying my first camera and I need your help.
Would you choose the Olympus OMD 5 over the Lumix G80? I'll be doing photo and video (occasionally).
For nighttime photography suggest reading Lance Keimig. The rule of thumb there is tripod, /small/ aperture (for sharpness), lowish ISO and long shutter. Of course this falls apart if there is movement you have to freeze and grab the Summilux.
B&W can look good at high ISO with its fast film grainy look.
I much preferred the images taken with the EM5, they were warmer and I really liked them. OM1 was cold looking. Great test 👏
I think color handling has probably changed a lot. The OM-1 is slightly more blue-biased compared to previous models. I can tell that when compared to my Panasonic G7. Though it's not terrible. It also depends on the lighting and how the auto white balance adapts. In raw, it isn't really an issue. Though I tend to prefer jpegs out of camera.
These are RAWs they are only as 'warm' as the sliders setting..🤷♂️
@@Paul_anderson_creative Most raw processing engines, whether Lightroom, DXO, CaptureOne, etc., will read the info from the file and honor the basic color profile and white balance unless you opt to change it. Not to mention, each sensor and software in a camera can produce different potential in their raw files. So color science exists.
Two things:
Completely agree with the breathing tip. My photographer friends are always arguing about whether clicking at breath in or breath out (I’m a breath out type of clicker).
Also love your MMPR/Sentai collection. Incredible stuff!
Ok, so I picked the wrong camera most (not all) of the time AND often preferred the EM5. That surprised me, but then I realized effectively what you said…’most cameras for the last many years can produce wonderful photos’…I would add you just need someone who knows how to use it! Just another tool! Nice job Emily..wonder if the Mk111 would have worked much the same as the Mk1. Loved the Star Trek reference btw…And to close a quote from the Matrix (aligns with all the great tips you provided here) : “ I Can Only Show You The Door. You're The One That Has To Walk Through It."
I printed a picture of the EM5 and taped it to my desk until several paydays later I bought this camera the year it was launched only in black because silver was sold out. It has been with me to Canada,Japan, Singapore across the Usa and in the Philippines in all kinds of weather from freezing to hard rains and salt water beaches. Weather sealed easily rinsed off with the WR lens and Even now that I own numerous other Brands from Fuji, Canon, Pentax, Sony and Lumix I still to this day if just running out the door Grab my Trusty friend Olympus EM5 without hesitation knowing I can get both beautiful photos and stabilisation for video. I'm not a one camera does all believer if you can afford other cameras more specialised for specific tasks but if I could only afford one camera to sufficiently do everything this one would be it. I also own the EPL5 and an electronic viewfinder added and picture/video quality is identical. But the view finder cost me as much as a used camera so its a great camera if using the back screen only making it a steal on the used market. Plus MFT lenses fit any MFT camera even the ones from china. I've watched your videos from the first one you ever posted and love that your not prideful you've remained a lovely person and a joy to view
IBIS easily makes up for more than anything else for this, more than you can afford for aperture, more than crop vs large, more than wide angle, anything. (maybe not all those combined). It's flipping amazing, I can take 1/2 second or if I do a burst sometimes 1s exposures handheld (with all those stability techniques). Absolutely bonkers.
Nice comparison and a real eye opener! I have the E-M5 Mk I and Mk III models. Have to admit, I probably wouldn't be able to tell the two apart in a blind test either. So why did I guy the Mk III? Sucked in by the allure of the 20MP sensor. But I still much prefer the lovely magnesium alloy feel of the Mk I over the plastic Mk III.
Great video and tips. To be honest, after post processing and having the image sized for the web, I could not see a difference.
I still have the E-M5 and E-M5 Mark ii.
I use the E-M5 Mark ii more because the E-M5 has a faulty mode dial when set to "A".
One of those Gorillapod type tripods might work to grip/keep the camera stable.
Also set the camera somewhere, use the timer with antishock so you don't even need to hold the camera.
I recently bought a remote shutter release because E-M5 accessories are cheap now.
Great video!
First time watching this channel (and subscribing, btw). But I just want to say: LOVE the Dragon Dagger on your shelf! (As well as all the other original Power Rangers paraphernalia)
On the subject: thanks for the tips. I was glad that I could recognise the different images and put them with the right model. But in fairness, the old one does still produce decent quality.
Got to love the E-M5. I have had such great adventures with mine. An absolute prized possession.
Awesome video looking forward to seeing more. I miss using my email. I loved that camera
Thanks for your video. EM5 is holding up well enough
At 6:30 I much preferred the $200 camera's look. Kinda crazy. Also speaks to your talent to extract as much as possible.
Wow, really spectacular and very revealing. First of all I would like to tell you that after seeing some of your videos I have signed to the channel. It is very enjoyable and at the same time very interesting to learn to handle my micro four third camera (Olympus em5 Markii and Em1 Markiii)
The great challenge I have is to always take photos in theaters, and I have been able to take very good photos (to review as a family, mine not only fun and a training) and on many occasions I do not get in balance between speed, ISO and the expected result . Too many photos with movement. Any advice for these types of situations? Thank you very much from Barcelona - Catalonia (hopefully we had the rain you have in Liverpool!).
Nice video. Though to me is more about inprovements in AF rather than quality. I have the EM5 mark II, and it suffices in terms of IQ. However tracking my 2yo kid its quite challenging. Why not making the om5 with same specs as om1 but with lighter classy body? It looks as if the new om5 is alteady old in terms of tech… would it worth to upgrade?
Nice vid. May I ask, are you using the S5 II / X as your A cam now? Looks fabulous.
Yes! And occasionally the g9ii, I sort of use them interchangeably at this point theyre all great!
Excellent video.
I enjoyed your comparison video and your style of presenting. There were also some nice photos and videos to illustrate your premise.
I'm a Fuji photographer. I have several bodies, ranging from the X-E1 I bought used for $200.00 to the X-S20 I bought for $1300.00. I found, as you did, the newer camera is well worth the difference in price. However, my X-E1 and X-E2s are charming little cameras that I use on a regular basis.
I started taking photos as a young boy in the 1950s, ending up getting a BFA in photography and working many years as a full time pro. Back then, ASA (ISO) 400 was considered a very fast film. In a pinch, you could push ISO 400 film one stop to ISO 800, but shadows didn't lift like highlights did. Now I shoot at 3200 regularly and even 6400 when needed. Software like DxO does a wonderful job with noise reduction. I shoot more low light now than I ever did in the film days.
Low light photography in the film days was ridiculously hard plus expensive. I had an om-1 (the film one) from 1976 that I used in the 1990's, and the fast lenses that came with it meant extremely shallow depths of field. You wouldn't know it, though, until after you developed your film. Photography before the age of digital really did require a college degree or some sort of professional certification; the technical requirements were right up there. Modern cameras (especially the more recent 4/3 bodies) may be quite noisy in low-light but most of the pictures they take are in focus.
I have the delicious Olympus om10 in mint condition , 35mm film camera back in to day it was pretty advanced
For me most of my faves where the cheap camera. And shooting at night is always been my favouite style along side landscape. I got a Sony a7iii and love it got a 1.4GM lens with it sometimes the 24mm is a bit wide wishing | had a plus 50mm for close shots. Also I had an old FujiFilm onee of the first decent digtral cameras I used and despite it's 12mp it was so good when it came to photos and video even compared to some today. Intresting for sure
I love my MFT Lumix GF6's low light capability! Despite being really old it holds up really well!! I take it to football matches where my A7 would just be too big and I get decent results despite using the higher ISOs (Photoshop's new AI noise thing helps a lot too)
Thanks Emily, good advice. I used to have gear envy and would listen to influencers who would extol a new camera model that was "100% faster focusing" or "Has amazing improved ISO performance." Sadly, I would sometimes purchase said camera only to find that it was only slightly better in both areas than my previous camera. Lesson learned. There are certain times when I use my giant pro-level DSLR (yes, I still have a DSLR), but generally, a small camera does the trick for me. As an aside I was at a friend's birthday party in a dark restaurant. I took a shot with my iPhone (no flash) and even that gadget produced a very nice photo.
First time seeing your content but you made some excellent points (and caused more than a few chuckles, as well! lol). Interesting comparisons but similar to what I've been going through after an upgrade from my old E-510 to the E-M1X (over 50k cycles on the old Evolt and electrical tape to hold the battery/card door closed lol). I still go back and occasional reprocess old .raw files from a decade ago for some still hold their own to this day, even though the technical quality is far different. I attribute a lot of that to shooting techniques and you nailed some of those in this discussion. I remember thinking that the image stabilization in the old days was great (I had bought the E-510 in lieu of the E-1's my dad was using at the time since I was primarily shooting aerial images and it was a smaller body) but I am amazed by how slow I can shoot handheld now, even in hi-res mode. But, wait, why not tryyyy 400mm handheld? Bwahahaha :))) Good stuff here... Thanks for sharing! :)
Also, DxO DeepPrime XD does WONDERS for the EM5 high ISO files. The new Denoise in LR is pretty good, but DeepPrime is the bomb. And more importantly, in each shot I prefer the colors you were getting. It was one of the surprising things I found when I recently added the OG EM5 to my stable. I bought it to do BW work, but the colors straight out of camera in Raw are so nice.
I'm not a M4/3 user but enjoyed the video with some good tips for shooting in low light. Thanks.
As always from Emily, a very cool video
Great video! :) Btw, how do you have the rode mic attached to the shirt?
A little magnet adapter! It's so handy! It's a rode official accessory