😇यहां IPC की सारी वीडियोस मिलेंगी👇👇👇👇 INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 LECTURES FOR LLB LLM PCSJ: th-cam.com/play/PLIj2toeLd48AqP1lF-js7ptuRGVTkA6Ok.html ⭕Only following subject's pdfs are available IPC : 100Rs Evidence : 100Rs Cpc : 149Rs SRA : 80Rs Limitation Act : 70Rs Partnership Act : 70Rs Jurisprudence : 149Rs Equity : 50Rs Constitution : 199rs CrPC : 149Rs If you want to buy then mail me here znt70600@gmail.com or text me on my telegram I'd @ZeenatSiddique यहां Evidence की सारी वीडियोस मिलेंगी👇👇👇👇 😇playlist Watch "INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT by Zeenat th-cam.com/play/PLIj2toeLd48CBDhlI4_N5UliHLxKEGba5.html 😇Share the videos and keep supporting me. 😇 STUDY GO with Zeenat 😊Join me on telegrams. ..👉 t.me/studygowithzeenat 😊If you wanna follow me on instagram then click here 👉 instagram.com/zeenat_siddique70600/
The explanation was ok but the notes which you presented were not made chronologically as I was noting them in my book it made my mind go crazy as they were starting from somewhere else and ending elsewhere Suggestions- you should provide these ppts by which we can understand or write them and learn them promptly
Medem apse ek request h Jo bhi ap video lectures bna rhi h plzzz insbhi ko subject wise play list m dal do jisse agar hamari video lectures miss ho jaye to hum channel se Kisi bhi time excess kr ske. Thanks
This question is invalid in itself ..since it is mandatory to read bare acts ..otherwise how will you survive in judiciary 😶 and bare act ki language samajhna bhot he zyada zaruri hai
@@Shree12344 okk mam ..thnku 🧡🤍💚so much but hamare faculty bolte bare act avi padhke fayeda nahi hai ... professional mai padna🥺🥺🥺 isliye mai confused hu
B shall not be held liable, he should be freed using the maxim actus me invito factus non est mens actus and section 94 of ipc. And in the second case, the person wouldnt be held liable because he was unaware that there was another person.
Yes the person kill the tiger should be liable for his act . Because he had don voluntarily act and knowledge of his act . Negligence is also found in this act. If iam wrong then please correct me.
Mam meri ak question hai...im a student of cs or wha jigl hai ..to aapke lec deke mene ..mam bare act se padna jaruri hai kya?..kuch log bolte bare act nahi pade to law samj hi nahi payenge ..tora help karo mam plzz🥺
IPC ki separate PDF Nahin Banai ja rahi hain for each topic... pura ek ebook taiyar Kiya ja raha hai... जब पूरी बुक तैयार हो जाएगी तो वह आपको purchase करनी होगी. IPC पूरा पढ़ाने के बाद
Madam kya baat krte ho act 1865 me kya ek ladki ki adult age 18 years hoti thee? Aapko pata hai 1929 me ya pahle India me ladki ki age marriage k liye 13 years hoti thee phir 1929 me amendment kr k ladki ki age 15 year aur ladke ki sayad 16/17 ki gyi..aur ladki ki marriage k liye 18 years age 1978 me amendment kr k ki thee. Then how is possible that in act 1865 in England a girl's marriage age was 18 years?
17 years old girl fell in love with a boy of 22 years old. Both loved each other. Girl eloped with the boy and married him. At the instigation of girl, s parents the boy was arrested under pocso act. The case is under trial now. Girl turned against the boy gave evidence against him that he abducted her and raped her etc.. under these circumstances , can the boy take a defence that he was not having any mensrea to do this act?
😇यहां IPC की सारी वीडियोस मिलेंगी👇👇👇👇
INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 LECTURES FOR LLB LLM PCSJ: th-cam.com/play/PLIj2toeLd48AqP1lF-js7ptuRGVTkA6Ok.html
⭕Only following subject's pdfs are available
IPC : 100Rs
Evidence : 100Rs
Cpc : 149Rs
SRA : 80Rs
Limitation Act : 70Rs
Partnership Act : 70Rs
Jurisprudence : 149Rs
Equity : 50Rs
Constitution : 199rs
CrPC : 149Rs
If you want to buy then mail me here znt70600@gmail.com or text me on my telegram I'd @ZeenatSiddique
यहां Evidence की सारी वीडियोस मिलेंगी👇👇👇👇
😇playlist Watch "INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT by Zeenat
th-cam.com/play/PLIj2toeLd48CBDhlI4_N5UliHLxKEGba5.html
😇Share the videos and keep supporting me.
😇 STUDY GO with Zeenat
😊Join me on telegrams. ..👉
t.me/studygowithzeenat
😊If you wanna follow me on instagram then click here 👉 instagram.com/zeenat_siddique70600/
mam please if you have the notes of ipc please provide
Zeenat siddique is best chanel on you tube for law
Many many thnks too you aap meri bahut help krte ho ...
Jitna thnks bolu utna km hai 👍👍
Macualay- law minister , and chairman of 1st law commission of india
Lord Macauley:- founder of ipc,1860..
Thanks didi
The explanation was ok but the notes which you presented were not made chronologically as I was noting them in my book it made my mind go crazy as they were starting from somewhere else and ending elsewhere
Suggestions- you should provide these ppts by which we can understand or write them and learn them promptly
1) B has not committed any offence , B is within the exception of section 94.
Radheradhe jai siyaram jai vrishbhan k jamai ki jai thank you mam😊
Apka video bht helpful hai . thanku so much
IPC was drafted in 1860 under the chairmanship of Lord Macaulay
You are amazing sister Allah All ways bless you and help in your susses
'B' has not committed any offense, according to the maxim and IPC under section 94
Hi the answer to the situation you have given here is not explained in the next video..pls give your view points on them also
Thanks for this valuable informative video ma'am 😊❤️ keep it up
Medem apse ek request h Jo bhi ap video lectures bna rhi h plzzz insbhi ko subject wise play list m dal do jisse agar hamari video lectures miss ho jaye to hum channel se Kisi bhi time excess kr ske. Thanks
INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 LECTURES FOR LLB LLM PCSJ: th-cam.com/play/PLIj2toeLd48AqP1lF-js7ptuRGVTkA6Ok.html
Expalanation काफी बढ़िया था..👌👌👌
कृपया "शेराज बनाम रुटजन" और "होब्स बनाम विनचेस्टर कॉर्पोरेशन" पर एक seperate वीडियो बना दीजिये।
Mam iske baad Strict Liability and vicarious liability k upr bhi vedio bnaye pls
Hlw mam ...i fall in love with ur teaching style..mam meko ak question puchni ..bare act padna jarurii hai kya??
This question is invalid in itself
..since it is mandatory to read bare acts ..otherwise how will you survive in judiciary 😶 and bare act ki language samajhna bhot he zyada zaruri hai
@@Shree12344 okk mam ..thnku 🧡🤍💚so much but hamare faculty bolte bare act avi padhke fayeda nahi hai ... professional mai padna🥺🥺🥺 isliye mai confused hu
@@mohitbarman most welcome !
Mam probation of offenders act 1958 par video bano with important case laws for judiciary point of view
Probation offender act par video banao mam
Nice explanation ma'am 👍 thank you
Ma'am which books you refer in videos
B shall not be held liable, he should be freed using the maxim actus me invito factus non est mens actus and section 94 of ipc. And in the second case, the person wouldnt be held liable because he was unaware that there was another person.
Agar prince ladki ke father se permission leta usse bhagane ki toh uska father prince ko is duniyaa 🌍 se hi bhga detaa😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂😅🤣 Sahi baat h
😂😂😂
Well expressive on 1sr legal maxim....
Nice explanation maam
Excellent madam ji
Yes the person kill the tiger should be liable for his act .
Because he had don voluntarily act and knowledge of his act .
Negligence is also found in this act.
If iam wrong then please correct me.
Nope.
@@nikhilchandra8798 then what's your observation?
Mam isse notes bna skte h kya dullb me hu self notes bnane h plz reply
Yes
Ma'am exception to mens rea pr video chaiye
Thank you ma'am ❤️🌹
Nice explanation mam 👌👌👌
Mam meri ak question hai...im a student of cs or wha jigl hai ..to aapke lec deke mene ..mam bare act se padna jaruri hai kya?..kuch log bolte bare act nahi pade to law samj hi nahi payenge ..tora help karo mam plzz🥺
Your video is very bast
Good 👍👍
aapke ipc ke notes llb ke first semester ke liye enough hai?
paid wale
Yes
@@studygowithzeenat how to buy ?
Mail me here znt70600@gmail.com or text me on my telegram I'd @ZeenatSiddique
Nice mam.
420 ke case me men's riya lagu hoga.
Best channel
Thku so much mam😊
Mam me aap ke sare pdf download kiya hun.mam kya ADministrative law mcq,TPA mcq de sakti ho and trade union act
Mam pdf kab send krogey?
IPC ki separate PDF Nahin Banai ja rahi hain for each topic...
pura ek ebook taiyar Kiya ja raha hai... जब पूरी बुक तैयार हो जाएगी तो वह आपको purchase करनी होगी. IPC पूरा पढ़ाने के बाद
Ok mam 😊
Thku so much mam😊
Ma'am tp act b padhaa doo complete
Can u plz explain what is mens ria & statutory crime..?
Thank you ma'am
Thanks
Great ,superb mam
Contract act bhi kara dijiye
Dono questions ka answer ye hai ki, he is not liable for punishment
Video achhi h ma'am but too many ads.
Thnx🖤
author of IPC, PPC, Macaulay
thank u ❤️🙏
Hindi me notes mil jayege ?
Mam evidence ki book jiska price apne 100 rupees hai uska send krdo
आपको purchase करनी पड़ेगी आप मुझे मेरे ईमेल पर znt70600@gmail.com mail कीजिए
Mam I send mail
Plz check it
Pahle aapko 100rs pay krne honge
Madam kya baat krte ho act 1865 me kya ek ladki ki adult age 18 years hoti thee? Aapko pata hai 1929 me ya pahle India me ladki ki age marriage k liye 13 years hoti thee phir 1929 me amendment kr k ladki ki age 15 year aur ladke ki sayad 16/17 ki gyi..aur ladki ki marriage k liye 18 years age 1978 me amendment kr k ki thee. Then how is possible that in act 1865 in England a girl's marriage age was 18 years?
Good mam
zeenat mam , yeah section 55 kismain mention hai , k bina parents k consent k saza milegi>???
mujhe kahi nahi mila , please explain this .
India nhi englend ke aprad vidhi me tha
Mam judiciary point of view se videos bano or un m judiciary k point of view se important case laws discuss karo
यहां discuss किए गए सब cases Judiciary में आते हैं।..
Here non of them is not liable .both had not done any offence
यह आपराधिक मानव वध का अपराध है - झाडी वाला दूसरे वाले मे भी वह अपराधी नही है
It's Malum in se ...not mahim in se !
There are many mistakes in this video.
17 years old girl fell in love with a boy of 22 years old. Both loved each other. Girl eloped with the boy and married him. At the instigation of girl, s parents the boy was arrested under pocso act. The case is under trial now. Girl turned against the boy gave evidence against him that he abducted her and raped her etc.. under these circumstances , can the boy take a defence that he was not having any mensrea to do this act?
Mens rea is not available in serious crimes
Bhai ladka to gya..He eloped with minor. And moreover rape is the accusation which means rape of a minor. So he is guilty of kidnapping and rape.
Acha padhati ho but bohat jaldi me padhati ho
Thanks mam
Father of IPC
Hello mam
Mam plz correct spelling 'he 'new' his act was wrong' in last line 7:38 ....I think vo new nahi knew hoga🙏🙏🙏
Please tell
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
You are very beautiful.