Russia signed contract with Slovakia until 2034, however contract was signed with UA for transit of gas only until 2024. UA supposed to be occupied by Russia by now, fortunately not happened. It is betrayal. Svk has obligation to sue Gazpron.
@@lambertax contract is take, or pay as long as I know and still running. Sanctions are applied due to illegal invasion, has nothing to do with a contract. After fall of iron curtain RF owned debt to Svk due to fact CzechoSlovakia was financing construction of gas and oil pipeline. They have paid it in shady ways through politburo driven politicians in Svk. We have been always threaten by dependency on energy carriers. This has to STOP if PM stating we are "Sovereign state". Untrustworthy partner.
the chicks come back to the roost, I think this clearly shows the desperation of Putin who is obviously calling in all the favours he can and by doing so reveals all those who are/have been on the Russian payroll this entire time.
1. Energy Crisis The war has significantly disrupted energy supplies, particularly natural gas, which Europe heavily relies on from Russia. The resulting energy crisis has led to skyrocketing prices, straining households and businesses. For example, countries like Germany, which have traditionally relied on Russian gas, faced severe energy shortages and were forced to seek alternative sources, often at much higher costs. This has resulted in inflation and reduced economic growth across the continent. ### 2. Inflationary Pressures The war has contributed to rising inflation in Europe, driven by increased energy prices and supply chain disruptions. Higher costs for energy and raw materials have led to increased prices for goods and services, diminishing consumer purchasing power. This inflation has forced central banks, like the European Central Bank, to raise interest rates, further slowing economic growth and making borrowing more expensive for both consumers and businesses. ### 3. Disruption of Trade The conflict has disrupted trade routes and supply chains, particularly for essential goods like grain and other agricultural products, as Ukraine is a significant exporter. This has led to food shortages and increased prices across Europe, with countries dependent on Ukrainian grain, such as those in Eastern Europe, facing dire consequences. The ripple effects have impacted various industries, leading to job losses and decreased economic activity. ### 4. Increased Defense Spending In response to the war, many European countries have increased their defense budgets substantially. While this may be necessary for national security, the diversion of funds from social programs, infrastructure, and economic development can have long-term negative effects on economic growth. Increased military spending can crowd out investment in critical areas like education and healthcare, which are essential for sustainable economic development. ### 5. Refugee Crisis The war has resulted in a massive influx of refugees into Europe, particularly from Ukraine. While many countries have shown solidarity and support for these individuals, the sudden increase in population can strain public services and infrastructure, leading to increased costs for governments. This can impact local economies, especially in regions that may already be economically vulnerable. ### 6. Long-term Economic Uncertainty The ongoing conflict creates an environment of uncertainty that can deter investment. Businesses are less likely to invest in an unstable region, leading to slower economic growth and job creation. Additionally, the potential for the conflict to escalate or for new geopolitical tensions to emerge can further undermine confidence in the European economy. ### Conclusion In summary, the Ukraine war poses significant negative economic effects on Europe, including energy crises, inflationary pressures, trade disruptions, increased defense spending, challenges related to the refugee crisis, and long-term uncertainty. These factors collectively hinder economic growth and stability, making a strong argument against the continuation of the conflict from an economic perspective. Addressing these issues requires diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict and restore stability, fostering a more favorable economic environment for Europe.
They literally take the biggest political/ideological opponents of the current government (mostly NGO, ultra liberal,.....).... A lot of facts are being kept unsaid....
Russia signed contract with Slovakia until 2034, however contract was signed with UA for transit of gas only until 2024. UA supposed to be occupied by Russia by now, fortunately not happened. It is betrayal. Svk has obligation to sue Gazpron.
No, since the sanctions apply, the contract is over!
@@lambertax contract is take, or pay as long as I know and still running. Sanctions are applied due to illegal invasion, has nothing to do with a contract. After fall of iron curtain RF owned debt to Svk due to fact CzechoSlovakia was financing construction of gas and oil pipeline. They have paid it in shady ways through politburo driven politicians in Svk. We have been always threaten by dependency on energy carriers. This has to STOP if PM stating we are "Sovereign state". Untrustworthy partner.
the chicks come back to the roost, I think this clearly shows the desperation of Putin who is obviously calling in all the favours he can and by doing so reveals all those who are/have been on the Russian payroll this entire time.
Stefanec your head is suspicios
The second leader in the world where this statement applies....Shit he missed!!!
Meet with fico? Seriously? I don't think so!!
Being concerned about your people is not a "game"! Fighting on behalf of the population for consistent and cheaper energy is not a "game".
Clear talk....thank you
EU have to talk with one voice
1. Energy Crisis The war has significantly disrupted energy supplies, particularly natural gas, which Europe heavily relies on from Russia. The resulting energy crisis has led to skyrocketing prices, straining households and businesses. For example, countries like Germany, which have traditionally relied on Russian gas, faced severe energy shortages and were forced to seek alternative sources, often at much higher costs. This has resulted in inflation and reduced economic growth across the continent. ### 2. Inflationary Pressures The war has contributed to rising inflation in Europe, driven by increased energy prices and supply chain disruptions. Higher costs for energy and raw materials have led to increased prices for goods and services, diminishing consumer purchasing power. This inflation has forced central banks, like the European Central Bank, to raise interest rates, further slowing economic growth and making borrowing more expensive for both consumers and businesses. ### 3. Disruption of Trade The conflict has disrupted trade routes and supply chains, particularly for essential goods like grain and other agricultural products, as Ukraine is a significant exporter. This has led to food shortages and increased prices across Europe, with countries dependent on Ukrainian grain, such as those in Eastern Europe, facing dire consequences. The ripple effects have impacted various industries, leading to job losses and decreased economic activity. ### 4. Increased Defense Spending In response to the war, many European countries have increased their defense budgets substantially. While this may be necessary for national security, the diversion of funds from social programs, infrastructure, and economic development can have long-term negative effects on economic growth. Increased military spending can crowd out investment in critical areas like education and healthcare, which are essential for sustainable economic development. ### 5. Refugee Crisis The war has resulted in a massive influx of refugees into Europe, particularly from Ukraine. While many countries have shown solidarity and support for these individuals, the sudden increase in population can strain public services and infrastructure, leading to increased costs for governments. This can impact local economies, especially in regions that may already be economically vulnerable. ### 6. Long-term Economic Uncertainty The ongoing conflict creates an environment of uncertainty that can deter investment. Businesses are less likely to invest in an unstable region, leading to slower economic growth and job creation. Additionally, the potential for the conflict to escalate or for new geopolitical tensions to emerge can further undermine confidence in the European economy. ### Conclusion In summary, the Ukraine war poses significant negative economic effects on Europe, including energy crises, inflationary pressures, trade disruptions, increased defense spending, challenges related to the refugee crisis, and long-term uncertainty. These factors collectively hinder economic growth and stability, making a strong argument against the continuation of the conflict from an economic perspective. Addressing these issues requires diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict and restore stability, fostering a more favorable economic environment for Europe.
😂😂😂😂😂 this is a comedy show, what a load Nonsense. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Solovyov is dark comedy, these are facts.
No1 propaganda channel 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Where are these commentators picked from? Too much garbage
They literally take the biggest political/ideological opponents of the current government (mostly NGO, ultra liberal,.....)....
A lot of facts are being kept unsaid....
TVP / Ivan Štefanec 👍🌟👍
Did the Kremlin pay Fico's Vietnam hotel bill?
it didnt have to, Fico is the most corrupt politician in slovakia
Calling others as propaganda and spreads US/NATO propaganda 24*7 😂😂😂TVP IS HILARIOUS
Muzhik, you do not like facts, do you?
@ these are facts😂😂😂u think these are facts brother …sure sure everyone knows now days
@@hemanshuambani9572 i am not your brother.
These are facts.
@@kvicithis is BS
Everything that conflicts with Russian narrative is 'propaganda', nothing new there, but does Russian pay enough to comment on "Nato' channel? 😅