I really like the way he is presenting the information. I think it would be infuriating for someone who knows the information already, but it's easy to listen to and to parse and to understand. I will refer back to this video in the future as a reference :)
I have a question about the four powers (electromagnetism, gravity, strong nuclear power, weak power) How did these four powerful forces separate from each other after the creation of the universe? Is that weak nuclear force separated from that electromagnetic force?
The Big Bang starts off extremely hot at which point all the forces are unified, then as it cools, gravity splits off from the other three (theory of everything). Then, as the universe cools, the strong force splits off from the rest (grand unification) at even lower temperatures, as time progresses further, electroweak symmetry breaking occurs. This is my understanding from reading Hawkings books intended for lay audience.
From 3:55 to 5:23. th-cam.com/video/xG_YtASz7gY/w-d-xo.html Is it true that Feynman diagrams showing a virtual particle exchange just jargon here correct?
a key to dark matter or no time for energy exchange short version Energy exchange limit or limit for two point to interact. it is a bit hard to write down this thought for me. if two points have relative speed more then speed of light, they not able to interact. but they can interact through the third point. (exactly like dark matter) long version For a long time trying to communicate with physics to clarify my theory. with all and all main point here. -dark matter in our galaxy, (most likely particles emitted by central black hole) is particles that moving faster than light. (most likely you do not "belive" in this) if i assume it is correct, then big amount of hydrogen on edge of galaxy, is where this "dark matter particles" decay after losing speed. (decay like new particles from hadron collider) -parts of dark matter alredy found, but we do not about it. (perseption(particles from hadron collider)) -particles found with hadron collider behave like a dark matter after loosing speed. -most likely there is a energy exchange speed limit in betwen two points (not sound speed), most likely it is a speed of light. (that about why we do not see dark matter, but see it interction with other(slower for it/faster for us) particles) -particles from hadron collider will be stable if placed in faster then light speed. whant to tell more, I hope this is enough to contact me. the key is a energy exchange speed limit (i want my Nobel for showing you dark matter) Best regards, Dynin A.I.
Can you make a video in which you are pointing neutrino beam on something (or rather putting something in neutrino beam) and describe it? I am curious!
their not actual particulars but the focal point of a never ending energetic field, that interacts with so called virtual partials of space, the whole interaction in time space and energy is mind blowing and requers a new math to predict any of it,
So the difference between a neutrino and a photon is that a photon was embedded in the electron field of an atom and we detect its frequency by spectral analysis and a neutrino was embedded in the proton and is ejected with minimal frequency. So since a neutrino has mass then a photon has mass.
Maybe someone someday could find a way to use Neutrinos like Photons to use their kinetic energy(if found) to knock electrons (or some other particles)as they pass through a material in order to produce a photo electric like effect for limitless power..... Someday ....... Dr Feynman says new ideas needed... Shalom
He did say both of those. The answer to why they have mass is because they oscillate. Relativity says that any particle which travels at the speed of light cannot possibly change state because time never passes for that particle. So because neutrinos oscillate, they must have mass. He didn't really stress this point but he mentioned it. Also the actual value of the mass was in the diagram he showed of the particle masses. It is very small.
there are two possibilities. either neutrinos do not have mass, or humans are fundmentally wrong about what mass is. we need way more scientific definitions and standard model dies not have them. there is not a single scientifically acceptable definition of mass. definitions should come from single definen phenomeno that you measure. that does not say what is fundmental and what is not. but creates far more accurate picture of reality. you could define mass as effect on spacetime. and all effects on spacetime would be mass. but nothing outside of that is mass. if you want mass to be something else, you need similarily defining phenomena and measurement. like you can have field interactions affecting the fields and have that as defining phenomena for mass. effect on spacetime while in reality it is field interactions or even interfield interaction. so photon would have mass if interfield interaction happens. like if field density differs due to "gravity" and photon causes field density to change, then photon would have defined mass. it very much depends what you think defines things like gravity and mass. and both of those things are something that most likely current theories get fundmentally wrong.
Photons spontaneously turn into election positron pairs and back to photons again. According to your logic, photons have mass. I call it photon oscillation. Where is my Nobel prize?
Important remark: the oscillations of neutrinos cannot be allowed by Nature because this hypothesis completely destroys the laws of conservation of energy and momentum, which is unacceptable under any circumstances. Probably the lecturer is not good enough in physics…
I have a question about the four powers (electromagnetism, gravity, strong nuclear power, weak power How did these four powerful forces separate from each other after the creation of the universe? Is that weak nuclear force separated from that electromagnetic force?
Great presentation! Andre' is a wonderful teacher. It's not often that a particle physics presentation is so much fun.
Awesome presentation
WTF?
So, much fun. Thanks for posting.
Do neutrino oscillations includes fermions and antifermions at the same time? i.e. are their oscillations between "six flavors"?
Andre's lecture was so captivating and fun! He's a great teacher
I like the way Andre explains things.
I really like the way he is presenting the information. I think it would be infuriating for someone who knows the information already, but it's easy to listen to and to parse and to understand. I will refer back to this video in the future as a reference :)
I have a question about the four powers (electromagnetism, gravity, strong nuclear power, weak power)
How did these four powerful forces separate from each other after the creation of the universe?
Is that weak nuclear force separated from that electromagnetic force?
The Big Bang starts off extremely hot at which point all the forces are unified, then as it cools, gravity splits off from the other three (theory of everything). Then, as the universe cools, the strong force splits off from the rest (grand unification) at even lower temperatures, as time progresses further, electroweak symmetry breaking occurs. This is my understanding from reading Hawkings books intended for lay audience.
th-cam.com/video/Uj2Z4Wb8k8o/w-d-xo.html does this make sense
"Neutrinos are very weird because they arent even mammals." I learn something new every day.
From 3:55 to 5:23. th-cam.com/video/xG_YtASz7gY/w-d-xo.html
Is it true that Feynman diagrams showing a virtual particle exchange just jargon here correct?
Gorillas can snatch individual neutrinos out of thin air with their highly dexterous and incredibly strong fingers.
Damn!!!! What a presentation😁😁😁
❤️neutrinos
My physics teacher told me they have no mass :-(. I should really educate him with this video but I'm not sure if he will appreciate it haha
th-cam.com/video/Uj2Z4Wb8k8o/w-d-xo.html does this make sense
Brilliant!
Where might be the rest of the scientific symposium?
Search for "physics slam fermilab". That's the name of the 'contest' each year, won by audience approval rating.
Great talk!
Why is it so short. I want to learn more.
The 'slam' is for short videos, kind of like TED talks.
Read a book.
a key to dark matter or no time for energy exchange
short version
Energy exchange limit or limit for two point to interact.
it is a bit hard to write down this thought for me.
if two points have relative speed more then speed of light, they not able to interact.
but they can interact through the third point. (exactly like dark matter)
long version
For a long time trying to communicate with physics to clarify my theory.
with all and all main point here.
-dark matter in our galaxy, (most likely particles emitted by central black hole)
is particles that moving faster than light. (most likely you do not "belive" in this)
if i assume it is correct, then big amount of hydrogen on edge of galaxy, is where this "dark matter particles" decay after losing speed. (decay like new particles from hadron collider)
-parts of dark matter alredy found, but we do not about it. (perseption(particles from hadron collider))
-particles found with hadron collider behave like a dark matter after loosing speed.
-most likely there is a energy exchange speed limit in betwen two points (not sound speed),
most likely it is a speed of light. (that about why we do not see dark matter, but see it interction with other(slower for it/faster for us) particles)
-particles from hadron collider will be stable if placed in faster then light speed.
whant to tell more, I hope this is enough to contact me.
the key is a energy exchange speed limit
(i want my Nobel for showing you dark matter)
Best regards,
Dynin A.I.
loved it !!
Gotta love neutrinos.
Can you make a video in which you are pointing neutrino beam on something (or rather putting something in neutrino beam) and describe it? I am curious!
their not actual particulars but the focal point of a never ending energetic field, that interacts with so called virtual partials of space, the whole interaction in time space and energy is mind blowing and requers a new math to predict any of it,
Oscillations are simple to explain. Everything is oscillating. Answer this, What's a neutrino?
Mohorovic discontinuity(s) in spacetime = neutrinos oscilations
So the difference between a neutrino and a photon is that a photon was embedded in the electron field of an atom and we detect its frequency by spectral analysis and a neutrino was embedded in the proton and is ejected with minimal frequency. So since a neutrino has mass then a photon has mass.
Question: What are dark matter particles?
Galaxies and stars rotate because of dark matter
Question: What are dark matter particles?
Maybe someone someday could find a way to use Neutrinos like Photons to use their kinetic energy(if found) to knock electrons (or some other particles)as they pass through a material in order to produce a photo electric like effect for limitless power..... Someday ....... Dr Feynman says new ideas needed... Shalom
Old tree knows.
I was hoping he would tell us the actual masses of neutrinos with error bars and why they have mass at all - very disappointing.
Those are not known.
He did say both of those. The answer to why they have mass is because they oscillate. Relativity says that any particle which travels at the speed of light cannot possibly change state because time never passes for that particle. So because neutrinos oscillate, they must have mass. He didn't really stress this point but he mentioned it. Also the actual value of the mass was in the diagram he showed of the particle masses. It is very small.
Lies.
Please check out my video on neutrinos and does it make sence
there are two possibilities. either neutrinos do not have mass, or humans are fundmentally wrong about what mass is. we need way more scientific definitions and standard model dies not have them. there is not a single scientifically acceptable definition of mass. definitions should come from single definen phenomeno that you measure. that does not say what is fundmental and what is not. but creates far more accurate picture of reality. you could define mass as effect on spacetime. and all effects on spacetime would be mass. but nothing outside of that is mass. if you want mass to be something else, you need similarily defining phenomena and measurement. like you can have field interactions affecting the fields and have that as defining phenomena for mass. effect on spacetime while in reality it is field interactions or even interfield interaction. so photon would have mass if interfield interaction happens. like if field density differs due to "gravity" and photon causes field density to change, then photon would have defined mass. it very much depends what you think defines things like gravity and mass. and both of those things are something that most likely current theories get fundmentally wrong.
Photons spontaneously turn into election positron pairs and back to photons again. According to your logic, photons have mass. I call it photon oscillation. Where is my Nobel prize?
Important remark: the oscillations of neutrinos cannot be allowed by Nature because this hypothesis completely destroys the laws of conservation of energy and momentum, which is unacceptable under any circumstances. Probably the lecturer is not good enough in physics…
I have a question about the four powers (electromagnetism, gravity, strong nuclear power, weak power
How did these four powerful forces separate from each other after the creation of the universe?
Is that weak nuclear force separated from that electromagnetic force?