it is probably the best downsized engine under 1.3 liter and it is out of european market now. its consumption in 160kmh is even better than 1.6 diesels.
I have the impression that especially with diesel engines, small displacement motors dont pay off much in terms of consumption. With low load, diesel engines are already more economical than gasoline engines who may profit from smaller motors in low load conditions. In high load conditions on Autobahn, smaller displacement doesnt make much difference anyway. The advantage of 2l diesel engines with low to medium power is longevity due to a low power-to-displacement ratio: Compare 110kW/2l diesel vs 110kW/1.5l gas or 85kW/1l 3cyl gas in popular VW group engines, for example. Small displacement or even 3cyl diesel may have an advantage in costs for the manufacturer. VW group even has switched to 2l for the small 85kW diesel in its Golf-class motors in recent times. They probably save costs by producing the same 2l engine and just limiting the power electronically. Shows they estimate little consumption advantages for their former 1.6l 85kW engine.
@@Howie_Dewitt. basically it proves what i was saying. from 100-140 he was going uphill on the autobahn and from 160-.. he was going downhil. thats why the consumption is so strange
![2022 Opel Astra [ Innovation Plus 1.2 130hp ] Amazingly silent car! | POV Test Drive](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U24fgmRJUVY/mqdefault.jpg)
it is probably the best downsized engine under 1.3 liter and it is out of european market now. its consumption in 160kmh is even better than 1.6 diesels.
Very good review, nice work. Thank you!
I have a 1.6 Astra J. Love this car
I don't
Hi, I have a question, does this engine have a chain or timing belt? thanks
timing belt, but better than the one in the Ecoboost, if you keep to the service intervals, nothing will happen.
Its 3C cold, not wondering for higher fuel consuption. I`ve got 4,5l/100km at 120 on a summer night at 20C.
Please continue consumption test at 180 and 200km/h 👍
Good bro
I have the impression that especially with diesel engines, small displacement motors dont pay off much in terms of consumption. With low load, diesel engines are already more economical than gasoline engines who may profit from smaller motors in low load conditions.
In high load conditions on Autobahn, smaller displacement doesnt make much difference anyway.
The advantage of 2l diesel engines with low to medium power is longevity due to a low power-to-displacement ratio: Compare 110kW/2l diesel vs 110kW/1.5l gas or 85kW/1l 3cyl gas in popular VW group engines, for example.
Small displacement or even 3cyl diesel may have an advantage in costs for the manufacturer.
VW group even has switched to 2l for the small 85kW diesel in its Golf-class motors in recent times. They probably save costs by producing the same 2l engine and just limiting the power electronically. Shows they estimate little consumption advantages for their former 1.6l 85kW engine.
Wie ist das Fahrwerk eigentlich bei der Karre? Schön angenehm oder eher Straff, dass man jede kleine Bodenwelle am Hintern spürt?
U can change gear upper d/d
Tachometer 270 km/h…excuse me what? lol
1:58
Maybe they are preparing a GSI version in the future
Opc.
not with the engine which can do about 230-240kmh. but the 200ps engine does about 250-260kmh. no GSI, GSE or OPC version.
Too fast for its replacement
Psa?
No GM
no way its fuel consumption is that high. you must be on an autobahn part where it going up
It’s a 3 cylinder turbo petrol, the consumption is actually fckn great!
@@Howie_Dewitt. no its not
@@accelerator5524 what? 7.2l at 160 is high? Or are you?
@@Howie_Dewitt. no but 5l at 100 is
@@Howie_Dewitt. basically it proves what i was saying. from 100-140 he was going uphill on the autobahn and from 160-.. he was going downhil. thats why the consumption is so strange
G