Michael Talley Oh yes, that bugs me. "offside" by the letter of the law, but obviously, practically speaking he had no part of the play. One of those "wellll ... technically ... I guess" calls where the guy was no part of the play. Quite unfortunate.
@@kylexinye1990 Same thing happened in game 1 of the Isles-Pens series that year. 28, or so, seconds in, Tom Kuhnhackl sniped Matt Murray but it was called back because Matt Martin, who was heading to the bench, was too slow to exit the zone.
@@janofrandsen1617 Actually, he's closer to right than you are. Kilometer is the American spelling. Kilometre is British, and is also the spelling used by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures. In Canada, either is acceptable, so you are in the wrong for trying to correct him.
Steve, you should bring us on a tour of that room you are filming in (if you haven't already). Looks like a lot of interesting stuff and I'm sure you've got some good stories on some of those pieces too! Thumbs up if you'd like to see it!
Man, that was a very interesting 14 minute video Steve. I’m so bewildered how that wasn’t offside either. And what would’ve been the outcomes for if that offside goal was disallowed.
I can fix the offside rule. It was obviously started to avoid egregious offsides, as Bettman himself has stated. Therefore, I say the refs get to watch the reply twice. Once at full speed, once at half speed. If it's not obvious by that point, the call on the ice stands and those 2" offsides that take away a goal will go away. Also, Nashville also got screwed because the Pens got a goal right after an icing play that should've been called down.
The best part of this dang-it is that the home-team announcers for the Avs were confused at why it wasn't called offside. You can hear in their voices they're trying their hardest to figure out if they can even celebrate such a ridiculous goal.
This was incredible, Steve. I love all of the time, thought, and research that went into these what-if, could've been scenarios, as well as all the connections you find to make between current players & teams. Truly awesome content and great insights. More of this please!
Thanks Steve. Needed this one. Especially as a Preds fan who was at Game 1 of the 2017 Stanley Cup Final sitting in THAT END WHERE THE GOAL WAS SCORED.
12:01 The stir-craziness is getting to you Steve! I don't wanna go back, but I remember you accidentally saying Colorado when you meant Calgary earlier, but this time you meant when the Pittsburgh Penguins won the 2017 Stanley Cup Finals and said 2016
I love all of Steve Dangle’s videos but PLEASE caption them so everyone can experience the amazingness that is Steve’s sarcasm and humor. If you all actively choose not to, I just hope you all just realize the irony of Steve signing “thank you” at the end of every video, but Deaf/deaf people not actually being able to watch the videos 🙃
@Li0nhunter365 "Mostly well enough" doesn't really cut it. Steve may speak clearly for the most part but it can be difficult to follow when there's no punctuation to mark the end of sentences. Also the auto cc is a complete joke whenever they switch to game broadcasts.
Did the preds touch the puck before ducane got the puck because if the preds touched the puck it is technically a goal just watch game 1 of the battle of Alberta in 2022
The official rules say that if a player on the opposite team hits it back into their own zone, there will be no offside, even if an opposing player is still currently in said zone.
What is trash is the fact that refs call back goals because of an offside from 5 minutes ago. If the other team has a chance to get back and they didn’t call it before, then they should let the goal stand. Stuff like this makes sense because the other team had no chance to stop that goal
@@Quellebreo373 Gotta say it was a hell of a run, but do remember your team has the most cup final losses in the NHL (one of them coming in 17 seconds). You know, as a humble reminder. lol
the hawks got screwed in Minnesota a couple years back over something similar to what you were saying at the 6 minute mark. Hjalmarsson laid out to block a pass and it went off his body to whoever scored the goal even though he was way offsides and they said Hammer "put it in his own zone" so it wasnt offsides
Yeah, but I'll buy that. If you take a deliberate action to hit (or be hit by) the puck, and cause it to change direction, that's on you, you redirected the puck into your own zone. That's different than just being clipped from behind because you were in the way of an opposing pass. It's like a kicking the puck in the net. If you intentionally kick the puck, there's no goal, even if it was intended as a legal kick pass that just bounced weird and went in. But if a shot bounces off your skate and into the net, with no intent or action on your part (other than just existing near the net), then the goal counts.
It's plain to see that the linesman wasn't paying attention, panicked and went "Yeah, that's onside", given how late his signal was. These things happen, sadly. I've been a cricket umpire and had to make decisions on run outs where I've maybe blinked at the wrong moment and missed the vital part of the play. You have to use your best judgement at the time. Glad there's reviews for this stuff now, but yeah, that really is a dangit!
Here’s a dang-it.... the Predators having a critical goal disallowed in Game 6 of the 2017 SCF that would have put Nashville up 1-0 instead of losing 2-0.
@@Diljabar I guess. I don't see a run-of-the-mill turn over in the neutral zone being called an "All Time Dang-It" though. 499/500 times that play does not end in a goal.
Matthew Martin nope same thing happened with Brett hull when he kicked the puck to his stick while in the crease. They said that is possession of the puck. The Nashville player kicked the puck up. Good enough for possession. I’m going to stay standing. Thank you.
@@adamcartwright4096 I assume you are talking about the Stanley cup final goal? That was dealing with the goalie crease! How is that in any way shape or form related to an offsides?! And he purposefully kicked the puck to go own stick to score. And it never even touched a Nashville's players foot. And if it was then it was Incidental. I.E. it just bounced off.
Matthew Martin yes it did touch the second Nashville player if you watch it. The puck goes off the first guy. Goes over to the second guy and he kicks it up to the Colorado player. It does not matter if it’s incidental or he meant to do it. The fact is he still kicked it. Which means he possessed the puck. Just like Brett hull who only time he touched the puck before putting it in the net while he was in the crease was when he kicked it to his stick. And the rule says if you possess the puck while in the crease then the goal is good. Brett hull never touched the puck besides him kicking it to his stick. So that kicking of the puck would deem him having possession. It would be the same with the Nashville player. It does not matter if he meant it or he didn’t. The fact that he kicked it is good enough.
The story is now not even over yet. Last night, in overtime, Nashville had too many men on nice. The refs made the call,.........................BUT THEY CALLED IT ON THE AVALANCHE (who don't have too many men on ice). The Predators went on the power play, and they win it in overtime on a goal by...........................what do you know............it's MATT DUCHENE!!! IT JUST CAME FULL CIRCLE!!! TWO TEAMS, TWO TERRIBLE CALLS, BOTH COSTING A TEAM THE ENTIRE GAME, AND BOTH GOALS SCORED BY MATT DUCHENE!!! IF THIS IS NOT THE DEFINITION OF DEJA VU, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS!
It was lost by refs. Although it was a horrible pk by the knights, the penalty should not have been a five. If it had been what it should have, then after the first goal, the pp should have ended making 1 goal on the pp instead of 4
allstarsucker if you are a San Jose fan, then you’re definitely not the happiest person anymore, considering the Sharks are worst in the western conference.
If we are mentioning things that didn't count in that 2017 final between Pittsburgh and Nashville, how about the game 6 no goal. I'm a pens fan and even I find that no goal ridiculous.
THANK YOU!!!! (I'm a Preds fan haha). You are the only pens fan I've ever come across that admits that. All the other ones I have met either just try and logically explain it or just smirk and look the other way. And congrats on the Stanley cup win :)
@@matthewmartin7639 The only "logical" explanation I could give is that 1- the ref was in a terrible spot and assumed Murray had the puck and 2- there was a moment earlier in the game where a whistle wasn't blown as quickly as it should have been so the refs were making up the call? Still a dang it of legendary proportions. How about giving both teams a dang it for that series. You guys outplayed us in Pittsburgh but the bounces went our way, then you killed us in Nashville. Then we killed you in game 5 and then game 6. The whole series should probably get a dang it.
@@hawkeye7522 Oh it was a heartbreaking ending to the fairytale run. I mean easily one of the worst played, called, and just overall experienced Stanley cup finals I've ever witnessed. And that's on booth teams and coaches. After both teams did so good it's like it all fell apart at the end.
It's so frustrating when the refs get it wrong one way. And then to overcompensate, the get wrong the other way. Refs: "No offsides, GOAL!" Fans, players, coaches, the offside player, the person who knows nothing about hockey: "He was clearly offsides!" Refs: "Offsides, No Goal!" Fans, players, coaches, the onside player, people just learning about hockey: "He was clearly onsides!"
The real question is... What video would we be watching if this offside was called? (Because this video would be non-existent) Sportsnet would be 126 dollars poorer, too! Predators may have a stanley cup because that "offside" would not have been called! What else would happen?..
Dang It idea: Game 1 2006 Stanley Cup Finals. Oilers vs Hurricanes. Oilers lead late in the second 3-0, Canes score 4 unanswered (1 late in second, and 3 in 3rd) to take the lead. Oilers score to tie 4-4. Oilers lose starting goalie (Roloson) to injury with ~5 minutes left in regulation. Conklin comes in, makes a couple of saves, but then with less than a minute left, he misplays the puck behind the net which leads to an open net Brind’Amour goal with 32 seconds left to give Canes the 5-4 win. Canes go on to win the cup in 7 that year so the misplay likely cost Edmonton the cup.
11:35 and that is going too far the other way...in which case the Preds get 💩 on yet again. Oh btw...that's not even ruled offsides NOW. 🤬 Thank you, Steve, for showing other fans how awful both calls were. Hopefully, we won't be 💩 on now, too. 😤
Interesting, I misremembered the Kucherov OT goal in 2015 as the catalyst for the offside review. I remember there was a good bit of chatter about review after that one.
Well I mean I know you said Steve not to be mad I love Colorado but that’s the problem with reffing these refs who supposedly have the most experience can’t make a clear call now if Someone has more experience than most you would think easy call to make right 💁🏻♂️ if it causes the domino effect for the draft we will never know
The NHL has a rule that it is NOT OFFSIDE if the defending team puts it in over the blue line. That is why the linesman ruled it "on side". You can see in the video that Craig Smith bats it in the zone, and there is even good old Hannan whacking at it too. After seeing that, it's only a matter of interpreting if they did it on purpose, or if it was just a deflection
This kind of counterfactual speculation is ridiculous. Final standings are made up of millions of small events. And "all else remains equal" is never how reality rolls.
In soccer if something like that happens you are expected to give the ball to the other team, and they don't just kick it past you either, everybody kind of resets. You see it in placed like the Champions League. I know they fall down when a fly lands on them, but there is still some professional behaviour.
First one wasn't offside because it was the defender who "passed" him the puck... "If a defending player moves or passes the puck into his defensive zone, while an attacking player is in the offside position, no offside shall be sentenced"
Steve dangle first the puck goes off one Nashville player then the other player kicks the puck into the zone. There for Nashville put the puck into their zone. Good goal. Same thing Brett hull did in the playoffs and they said he had control of the puck.
There were two touching by Predator's defenders before player of Colorado got the pass. In a fact it was a pass back to Nashv zone where are walking an adversary. Also it is no two line cross pass because pass change the track twice what lad to a pass was got slowly.
Great content but I have to push back in my chair to give your face room on my desk. Could you please not crop in so tight on your mug when speaking into the camera. Thanks in advance.
it could have been that the puck was played into the offensive zone by a defensive player?? I know it works that way if it was started in the defensive zone.. just a thought?
I thought that The War Room in Toronto reviews every goal, and can call the officials and tell them to call off a goal. Was that happening then? Shouldn't they have called that off?
Could you do Avalanche and Ottawa senators too many men penalty Avalanche got away from that penalty and Ottawa got men penalty, Avalanche got away, I want this to be explained, please
For all you people saying that it was kicked, you need to watch it closely. It hit the hand of a Nashville player and no other Nashville player kicked it watch it
I was having a decent time, having made peace long ago with the Duchene offside goal. Then you throw PK’s offside goal into the video, and now I want to go drink heavily.
I have a suggestion Colorado Avalanche too man got away with it and Ottawa Senators called too many man penalty look it up, trust me on this one, .I watching this game when it happened
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.82[1/2] แก๊ง 3 สาวเพื่อนซี้บุก CAMPปลิ้นครั้งนี้ห้ามเสียอาการ](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_6WUjXHe1TM/mqdefault.jpg)
The fact that you found a way to stretch this video to 14 minutes is mind blowing
Kyle Grimard I know
It was mind bending because of the parallel universe thing.
Dangle in a Preds jersey?????
He finally got over the 9-2 loss that NASHVILLE won
He didn't get over it. He just made peace with the fact that the Leafs will never win the Cup and is now a supporter of the Preds.
@@jorssu13 Also I think he suffered a much bigger pain.
Had the Avs not scored that goal, creating offside review, they might have won the playoff series against the sharks
john smith Very ironically ...
and in that playoff series, WE WEREN'T OFFSIDE!!!
@@hailmary7283 Damn, I guess we confused a linesman for Gabe Landeskog standing in the zone offsides
Michael Talley Oh yes, that bugs me. "offside" by the letter of the law, but obviously, practically speaking he had no part of the play. One of those "wellll ... technically ... I guess" calls where the guy was no part of the play. Quite unfortunate.
@@kylexinye1990 Same thing happened in game 1 of the Isles-Pens series that year. 28, or so, seconds in, Tom Kuhnhackl sniped Matt Murray but it was called back because Matt Martin, who was heading to the bench, was too slow to exit the zone.
1:29
"The linesman, I believe, got screened"
What he was really trying to say :
"The linesman, I HOPE, got screened"
And if you rewatch it, there is a linesman skating backwards looking directly at the play
Dang it idea: Montreal leaving Patrick Roy our to dry causing him to request a trade.
He took your idea, but didn't give a heart. Fail
He had to look over both shoulders to find the damn thing behind him.
Okay how about a breakdown of the 2004 Ottawa / Philly brawl and the events that led up to it?
Well, I guess we can call last year's "offsides" against the Sharks karma for this.
That is so true!
Was thinking the same thing.
One instance of BS never offsets another instance of BS. It just leaves the NHL with two BS plays.
@@DDWyss well, you aren't wrong
Thought I was gonna see Game 6 of the 2017 Stanley Cup Finals premature whistle. One of the worst calls on the biggest stages
"This was about a kilometre offside"
kilometer
@@janofrandsen1617 if you dont use the word you dont get to choose how to spell it
@@bleachmaster1545 I didn't choose. That's just how it's spelled. And I do use it. Not sure why you would be upset at that. Grow up.
@@janofrandsen1617 Actually, he's closer to right than you are. Kilometer is the American spelling. Kilometre is British, and is also the spelling used by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures. In Canada, either is acceptable, so you are in the wrong for trying to correct him.
@@boosterh1113 Yep that was my British English spellcheck
I like that duchene is like “ok I guess we’re doing this now” bc he knew he was offside
My reaction to this series as an Avs fan: Statue of Liberty “ew, skip.” This one “Yeah, okay, fair. I’ll watch this.”
Steve, you should bring us on a tour of that room you are filming in (if you haven't already). Looks like a lot of interesting stuff and I'm sure you've got some good stories on some of those pieces too!
Thumbs up if you'd like to see it!
I think he's done it on his own channel. Could be before he had to remodel it
Ah OK... I'll see if I can find it. Thanks!
Man, that was a very interesting 14 minute video Steve. I’m so bewildered how that wasn’t offside either. And what would’ve been the outcomes for if that offside goal was disallowed.
I can fix the offside rule. It was obviously started to avoid egregious offsides, as Bettman himself has stated. Therefore, I say the refs get to watch the reply twice. Once at full speed, once at half speed. If it's not obvious by that point, the call on the ice stands and those 2" offsides that take away a goal will go away. Also, Nashville also got screwed because the Pens got a goal right after an icing play that should've been called down.
The best part of this dang-it is that the home-team announcers for the Avs were confused at why it wasn't called offside. You can hear in their voices they're trying their hardest to figure out if they can even celebrate such a ridiculous goal.
This was incredible, Steve. I love all of the time, thought, and research that went into these what-if, could've been scenarios, as well as all the connections you find to make between current players & teams. Truly awesome content and great insights. More of this please!
Thanks Steve. Needed this one. Especially as a Preds fan who was at Game 1 of the 2017 Stanley Cup Final sitting in THAT END WHERE THE GOAL WAS SCORED.
Feel that one man (Preds fan too)
You should do Edmonton's blown lead in game five during the 2017 playoffs, and specifically the ALLOWED GOALIE INTERFERENCE on the tying goal!!!
This is my way of seeing it the trashville preds touched the puck making it not offside
12:01 The stir-craziness is getting to you Steve! I don't wanna go back, but I remember you accidentally saying Colorado when you meant Calgary earlier, but this time you meant when the Pittsburgh Penguins won the 2017 Stanley Cup Finals and said 2016
I love how even the fans didn’t even get excited about the breakaway because they knew it was offside.
I love all of Steve Dangle’s videos but PLEASE caption them so everyone can experience the amazingness that is Steve’s sarcasm and humor. If you all actively choose not to, I just hope you all just realize the irony of Steve signing “thank you” at the end of every video, but Deaf/deaf people not actually being able to watch the videos 🙃
@Li0nhunter365 "Mostly well enough" doesn't really cut it. Steve may speak clearly for the most part but it can be difficult to follow when there's no punctuation to mark the end of sentences. Also the auto cc is a complete joke whenever they switch to game broadcasts.
Of course it was a mile offside in the mile high city 😂
More like light year
Marc Bergevin's own goal against San Jose deserves a Dang-It!
I believe it has been mentioned before
How about redoing some drafts, with hindsight there's some hilarious misses. The top 10 or complete 1st round.
Did the preds touch the puck before ducane got the puck because if the preds touched the puck it is technically a goal just watch game 1 of the battle of Alberta in 2022
The official rules say that if a player on the opposite team hits it back into their own zone, there will be no offside, even if an opposing player is still currently in said zone.
What is trash is the fact that refs call back goals because of an offside from 5 minutes ago. If the other team has a chance to get back and they didn’t call it before, then they should let the goal stand. Stuff like this makes sense because the other team had no chance to stop that goal
Love the clips but please please replace the loud annoying guy with the big head, this video is unwatchable
I can actually watch this channel if they keep the obnoxious Leafs merch away
True the Penguins won the cup in 2016, but we played Nashville and beat them in the finals in 2017.
Anyone here who’s seen the cake makar “offside” goal
The Boston Philadelphia 2010 series is good dang it
teka jacobs shhhh we don’t talk about that, we talk about the 2011 rematch
@@Quellebreo373 that one didnt make history, all it did was prove we taught them a lesson
teka jacobs well... uhh... at least we won the cup XD
@@Quellebreo373 Gotta say it was a hell of a run, but do remember your team has the most cup final losses in the NHL (one of them coming in 17 seconds). You know, as a humble reminder. lol
teka jacobs that one hits hard😢
I think I need to watch you more often
the hawks got screwed in Minnesota a couple years back over something similar to what you were saying at the 6 minute mark. Hjalmarsson laid out to block a pass and it went off his body to whoever scored the goal even though he was way offsides and they said Hammer "put it in his own zone" so it wasnt offsides
Yeah, but I'll buy that. If you take a deliberate action to hit (or be hit by) the puck, and cause it to change direction, that's on you, you redirected the puck into your own zone. That's different than just being clipped from behind because you were in the way of an opposing pass.
It's like a kicking the puck in the net. If you intentionally kick the puck, there's no goal, even if it was intended as a legal kick pass that just bounced weird and went in. But if a shot bounces off your skate and into the net, with no intent or action on your part (other than just existing near the net), then the goal counts.
It's plain to see that the linesman wasn't paying attention, panicked and went "Yeah, that's onside", given how late his signal was. These things happen, sadly. I've been a cricket umpire and had to make decisions on run outs where I've maybe blinked at the wrong moment and missed the vital part of the play. You have to use your best judgement at the time. Glad there's reviews for this stuff now, but yeah, that really is a dangit!
This day may never come but it'll make my day / week to see Dangle wear a Sharks jersey.
Now Duchene plays for Nashville lol
Here’s a dang-it.... the Predators having a critical goal disallowed in Game 6 of the 2017 SCF that would have put Nashville up 1-0 instead of losing 2-0.
Even more ironically, Calle Jarnkrok and Elias Lindholm are cousins, so seeing Lindholm being drafted by the Predators would be kinda nice lol.
The puck was in 1970 while ducenne was in 2050
Idk if this was by coincidence, but my "up next" video was the Dang-Its vid with the Landeskog "offsides"
steve finally admits that producer drew isnt real
Steve is the most unbiased Leafs fan , EVER! I have a lot of respect for him, as an unbiased Habs fan .
Who else skips through him talking for the clips?
Lol when you're into the KHL and you hear the name Sergei Kostitsyn and you're like "heyyy you"
Doug gilmour watching this like “I am waiting for the dumb call by Kerry Fraser”.
All-time Dang-It: Steve Yzerman’s 2OT winner vs. Blues in ‘96
How's that a Dang-It? It's like the greatest shot in the history of the league?
Capella Gretzky had it, lost it
@@Diljabar I guess. I don't see a run-of-the-mill turn over in the neutral zone being called an "All Time Dang-It" though. 499/500 times that play does not end in a goal.
I actually kinda see how it counts now the Preds did put it in their own zone
Yada yada yada we should just shut the hell up
Thumbnail didn’t load in but I knew what it was
I hope you keep doing these "classics" even after regular play resumes (whenever that will be).
"How was that onside?"
Simple, he wasn't. Plain and simple.
Nashville kicks the puck into the zone. Kicking the puck is enough to possess the puck. Which makes the play good.
@@adamcartwright4096 Dude, the NHL made an entire new rule and review process because of this play. They even admitted they were wrong. Sit down.
Matthew Martin nope same thing happened with Brett hull when he kicked the puck to his stick while in the crease. They said that is possession of the puck. The Nashville player kicked the puck up. Good enough for possession. I’m going to stay standing. Thank you.
@@adamcartwright4096 I assume you are talking about the Stanley cup final goal? That was dealing with the goalie crease! How is that in any way shape or form related to an offsides?! And he purposefully kicked the puck to go own stick to score. And it never even touched a Nashville's players foot. And if it was then it was Incidental. I.E. it just bounced off.
Matthew Martin yes it did touch the second Nashville player if you watch it. The puck goes off the first guy. Goes over to the second guy and he kicks it up to the Colorado player. It does not matter if it’s incidental or he meant to do it. The fact is he still kicked it. Which means he possessed the puck. Just like Brett hull who only time he touched the puck before putting it in the net while he was in the crease was when he kicked it to his stick. And the rule says if you possess the puck while in the crease then the goal is good. Brett hull never touched the puck besides him kicking it to his stick. So that kicking of the puck would deem him having possession. It would be the same with the Nashville player. It does not matter if he meant it or he didn’t. The fact that he kicked it is good enough.
That's what i thought when i first watched the video, he kicks the puck into his own zone. It's more of an "oops," then an "offside."
Alot of excess commentary? , otherwise it's a great vid
Man I've missed Steve acting things out so much haha
Do the Blues win the 2019 cup if Steve Yzerman doesn't score the double ot goal? Would the "curse" have ended in 96?
Imagine helping out a Devil's fan on Hat Trick Trivia when you make fun of them every week
The story is now not even over yet. Last night, in overtime, Nashville had too many men on nice. The refs made the call,.........................BUT THEY CALLED IT ON THE AVALANCHE (who don't have too many men on ice). The Predators went on the power play, and they win it in overtime on a goal by...........................what do you know............it's MATT DUCHENE!!! IT JUST CAME FULL CIRCLE!!! TWO TEAMS, TWO TERRIBLE CALLS, BOTH COSTING A TEAM THE ENTIRE GAME, AND BOTH GOALS SCORED BY MATT DUCHENE!!! IF THIS IS NOT THE DEFINITION OF DEJA VU, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS!
I have a Dang-Its idea: how the Sharks won two series’ because of the refs, and won a game verses St. Louis because of the refs.
the VGK game wasnt lost because of the refs lol. No team should let in 4 goals on a penalty kill
It was lost by refs. Although it was a horrible pk by the knights, the penalty should not have been a five. If it had been what it should have, then after the first goal, the pp should have ended making 1 goal on the pp instead of 4
All I know is it made me the happiest person alive
allstarsucker if you are a San Jose fan, then you’re definitely not the happiest person anymore, considering the Sharks are worst in the western conference.
rampage I cheer for the sharks in the playoffs when they're not playing my team (Avalanche fan). I'm also an anti-Knights fan.
If we are mentioning things that didn't count in that 2017 final between Pittsburgh and Nashville, how about the game 6 no goal. I'm a pens fan and even I find that no goal ridiculous.
THANK YOU!!!! (I'm a Preds fan haha). You are the only pens fan I've ever come across that admits that. All the other ones I have met either just try and logically explain it or just smirk and look the other way. And congrats on the Stanley cup win :)
@@matthewmartin7639 The only "logical" explanation I could give is that 1- the ref was in a terrible spot and assumed Murray had the puck and 2- there was a moment earlier in the game where a whistle wasn't blown as quickly as it should have been so the refs were making up the call? Still a dang it of legendary proportions. How about giving both teams a dang it for that series. You guys outplayed us in Pittsburgh but the bounces went our way, then you killed us in Nashville. Then we killed you in game 5 and then game 6. The whole series should probably get a dang it.
@@hawkeye7522 Oh it was a heartbreaking ending to the fairytale run. I mean easily one of the worst played, called, and just overall experienced Stanley cup finals I've ever witnessed. And that's on booth teams and coaches. After both teams did so good it's like it all fell apart at the end.
Dan Cloutier 2002 playoffs..... THAT’S a classic Dang It
He doesn't whiff that goal I'd like to think we knock Detroit off its perch. The Canucks win the series and who knows?
It's so frustrating when the refs get it wrong one way. And then to overcompensate, the get wrong the other way.
Refs: "No offsides, GOAL!"
Fans, players, coaches, the offside player, the person who knows nothing about hockey: "He was clearly offsides!"
Refs: "Offsides, No Goal!"
Fans, players, coaches, the onside player, people just learning about hockey: "He was clearly onsides!"
The real question is... What video would we be watching if this offside was called? (Because this video would be non-existent)
Sportsnet would be 126 dollars poorer, too!
Predators may have a stanley cup because that "offside" would not have been called!
What else would happen?..
Dang It idea: Game 1 2006 Stanley Cup Finals. Oilers vs Hurricanes.
Oilers lead late in the second 3-0, Canes score 4 unanswered (1 late in second, and 3 in 3rd) to take the lead.
Oilers score to tie 4-4.
Oilers lose starting goalie (Roloson) to injury with ~5 minutes left in regulation.
Conklin comes in, makes a couple of saves, but then with less than a minute left, he misplays the puck behind the net which leads to an open net Brind’Amour goal with 32 seconds left to give Canes the 5-4 win.
Canes go on to win the cup in 7 that year so the misplay likely cost Edmonton the cup.
11:35 and that is going too far the other way...in which case the Preds get 💩 on yet again. Oh btw...that's not even ruled offsides NOW. 🤬 Thank you, Steve, for showing other fans how awful both calls were. Hopefully, we won't be 💩 on now, too. 😤
Interesting, I misremembered the Kucherov OT goal in 2015 as the catalyst for the offside review.
I remember there was a good bit of chatter about review after that one.
Idea: the trade of the great one.
Imagine if Torts was the coach of the Preds with Duchene's offside goal... He'll be arrested 😂
Here's a question..... how many NHL legends have a good chunk of their goals from offsides plays? Hmm 🤔🤔
I am real enjoying these deep looks into dang its!
Ironically, Matt Duchene now plays for Nashville...full circle. As a Preds fan, that Stanley Cup replay hurt my soul.
You ruined my life now I'm sitting here wondering about who would be were and why this is my life
Well I mean I know you said Steve not to be mad I love Colorado but that’s the problem with reffing these refs who supposedly have the most experience can’t make a clear call now if Someone has more experience than most you would think easy call to make right 💁🏻♂️ if it causes the domino effect for the draft we will never know
The NHL has a rule that it is NOT OFFSIDE if the defending team puts it in over the blue line. That is why the linesman ruled it "on side". You can see in the video that Craig Smith bats it in the zone, and there is even good old Hannan whacking at it too.
After seeing that, it's only a matter of interpreting if they did it on purpose, or if it was just a deflection
This kind of counterfactual speculation is ridiculous. Final standings are made up of millions of small events. And "all else remains equal" is never how reality rolls.
In soccer if something like that happens you are expected to give the ball to the other team, and they don't just kick it past you either, everybody kind of resets. You see it in placed like the Champions League. I know they fall down when a fly lands on them, but there is still some professional behaviour.
When you said everything about the 5-5 tie what if Nashville never scored again
First one wasn't offside because it was the defender who "passed" him the puck...
"If a defending player moves or passes the puck into his defensive zone, while an attacking player is in the offside position, no offside shall be sentenced"
Watching this two years later after seeing Matt Duchene get boo’d by Avalanche fans while he plays for Nashville is kinda funny 😂
Steve dangle first the puck goes off one Nashville player then the other player kicks the puck into the zone. There for Nashville put the puck into their zone. Good goal. Same thing Brett hull did in the playoffs and they said he had control of the puck.
LMAO Duchesne doesn't even TAKE A STRIDE after he gets the puck. He knows that he's offside
There were two touching by Predator's defenders before player of Colorado got the pass. In a fact it was a pass back to Nashv zone where are walking an adversary. Also it is no two line cross pass because pass change the track twice what lad to a pass was got slowly.
Great content but I have to push back in my chair to give your face room on my desk. Could you please not crop in so tight on your mug when speaking into the camera. Thanks in advance.
It's not offside... It was put in the zone by Nashville Predator player...
it could have been that the puck was played into the offensive zone by a defensive player?? I know it works that way if it was started in the defensive zone.. just a thought?
When steave says Jones is a Huracan by accident at the 1034 mark 😂😂😂
I thought that The War Room in Toronto reviews every goal, and can call the officials and tell them to call off a goal. Was that happening then? Shouldn't they have called that off?
The tart ocelot quantitatively wait because craftsman seasonally delay like a empty rod. painstaking, fantastic bay
So many goals get called off because of offside reviews. Imagine what the league would be like if we didn’t have stupid inch reviews
"The linesman i believe was screened".. he should have had his brain screened for calling that onside.
Why this doesn't have any likes is a mystery
Crazy thing is Preds coaches in those two “situations” were Trotz and Laviolette. Caps ex coaches
Could you do Avalanche and Ottawa senators too many men penalty Avalanche got away from that penalty and Ottawa got men penalty, Avalanche got away, I want this to be explained, please
sports stories always interest me cause theyre frustratingly and lovingly human. whether for better or for worse very much human.
How about the 2014 LA Kings beating the Sharks in a best of 7 with the Kings spotting them three games???
For all you people saying that it was kicked, you need to watch it closely. It hit the hand of a Nashville player and no other Nashville player kicked it watch it
Steve wearing a jersey that isn't blue feels wrong... and that's coming from a habs fan lol
I was having a decent time, having made peace long ago with the Duchene offside goal. Then you throw PK’s offside goal into the video, and now I want to go drink heavily.
I have a suggestion Colorado Avalanche too man got away with it and Ottawa Senators called too many man penalty look it up, trust me on this one, .I watching this game when it happened