DpnI digest in PCR-based molecular cloning

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ค. 2024
  • On the template plasmid, methyl marks the spot, but your new PCR products, this methyl group they have not! Dpn-ding on your template & your further plans, you may need to DpnI digest your PCR reaction
    blog form: bit.ly/DpnIandREs & bit.ly/reasesvsmtases
    In biochemistry and molecular biology we use a lot of protein machinery (enzymes) that come from bacteria that are super useful - they think so too!. They make it for themselves, we just steal it. For example, restriction endonuclease (aka restriction enzymes)(aka DNA scissors). These molecules recognize specific sequences in nucleic acid chains (DNA or RNA) and cut it. They use this as a way to destroy foreign DNA or RNA coming from foreigners like bacteria-invading viruses called bacteriophages (“phages”)
    But the bacteria face a dilemma - they have their own DNA too - and it’s even written in the same language, so the bacteria can’t just cut up all the DNA & RNA inside of itself or it will destroy its own genetic instructions - mutual annihilation
    So the bacteria needs a way to distinguish between its own DNA & the phages. One way is to limit the scissors to cutting at really specific sequences (usually 4-8 letter palindromes (think kayak or racecar) & making sure that those sequences aren’t in their own DNA. A lot of the restriction enzymes we use in the lab are this kind - we utilize that precise specificity to cut precisely where we want them to in a piece of DNA.
    This comes in super handy in molecular cloning - if we want to study a gene and/or the protein it has instructions for, we can use restriction enzymes to cut that gene out of one place and put it somewhere else that we can manipulate better. Often, we transfer genes into circular pieces of DNA called PLASMIDS that we put into bacteria - the bacteria will then copy the plasmid, make protein from it, etc. (another way we take advantage of these guys)
    BUT, remember, that’s not “why” the bacteria exist and make the normal things they make. They make restriction enzymes to protect themselves from those invaders. And the invaders can be sneaky - what if they don’t have those specific sequences? The phages have small genomes, so the chances of that sequence just randomly being there are small. Bacteria “know” this, so have evolved to target sequences that many phages need. But the phages can evolve to have different sequences.
    So the bacteria needs more “generic,” snip-happy scissors as backup. But, Dam, how will the bacteria protect its own DNA? Other enzymes called METHYLTRANSFERASES come to the rescue. These guys add methyl (-CH3) “tags” on the bacteria’s DNA. This methylation acts as a kinda uniform to tell the DpnI hey we’re on the same team!
    So methylation “hides” the cut sites of some restriction enzymes, but some bacteria have taken the opposite approach, potentially because some of those phages got tricky and started methylating their DNA. So the bacteria “decided” to swap roles - Streptococcus pneumoniae has a restriction enzyme, DpnI that ONLY cuts methylated sites. And this endonuclease can come in really handy in the lab as well!
    A lot of times when we’re doing molecular cloning, we’re doing something called site-directed mutagenesis - basically we want to change just a small piece of the gene but keep it in its same plasmid home.
    We can do this in different ways, but they mostly involve using PCR to make copies of the plasmid with the typo we want. It gives you lots of copies of the new, mutated, plasmid, but these are mixed in with all those “originals” and we need a way to weed out those template plasmids.
    note: This also comes into play with PCR-based cloning methods like SLIC
    When we’re cloning, we usually use a selectable marker like an antibiotic resistance that’s in that plasmid home so that only bacteria with our plasmid can grow if we spike their food with that antibiotic. But antibiotic selection markers won’t help us distinguish between un-mutated “template” plasmid & the mutated plasmid we want because the sequence is in the same plasmid, so they both have the selection marker.
    So we need another way to weed out the template plasmid. But they look almost the same right? There’s a key difference we can exploit - the methylation gets added in bacterial replication, but not during the replication we do in PCR (no methyltransferases in there). So the original templates will be coated in methyl groups but our new copies will be methyl-free.
    So, before we put the plasmid we’ve made into bacteria, we add some DpnI and some salts, etc. it likes, get it nice and cozy at 37°C and let it do its thing for a few hours - the DpnI will cut up the template plasmid but won’t touch your new copies. This way, when you stick the plasmid into the bacteria, only the new copies will be “viable” and only bacteria that take it up will be allowed to live because they have the plasmid selection marker.
    links in comments
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @thebumblingbiochemist
    @thebumblingbiochemist  ปีที่แล้ว +1

    more on R-M systems: bit.ly/reasesvsmtases; TH-cam: th-cam.com/video/cIiqV8vxZ78/w-d-xo.html  
    more on molecular cloning: bit.ly/molecularcloningguide   
    more on site-directed mutagenesis: bit.ly/mutagenesisconstructs & bit.ly/sitedirectedmutagenesis2
    more on colony PCR: bit.ly/colony_PCR & th-cam.com/video/DUWYnXaZyAo/w-d-xo.html
    more on analytical restriction digest: bit.ly/analytical_digest & th-cam.com/video/1fukzAdTvrk/w-d-xo.html
    more on sequencing clones: bit.ly/sequenceclones & th-cam.com/video/HxZcjX5WByc/w-d-xo.html
       
    more about all sorts of things: #365DaysOfScience All (with topics listed) 👉 bit.ly/2OllAB0 or search blog: thebumblingbiochemist.com

  • @afsanezarei2374
    @afsanezarei2374 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot

  • @GordonChao0508
    @GordonChao0508 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does DAM (DNA adenine methylase) present throughout the prokaryotes cell cycle, like DNA replication process?

    • @thebumblingbiochemist
      @thebumblingbiochemist  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm not sure sorry - you'd have to look into it. Cool question though!

    • @GordonChao0508
      @GordonChao0508 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thebumblingbiochemist Sorry for bothering, I'd like to ask "Plasmid incompatibility". It explained that two plasmids cannot coexist in the same replication origin. How does it actually occur? Should I worry about it?

    • @thebumblingbiochemist
      @thebumblingbiochemist  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I recommend checking out addgene's cloning blog. They have a lot of resources there that should help