To be fair, the T-Rex's bad eye sight was a plot point in the Jurassic Park books due to them adding Frog DNA to fill in the DNA gaps. The movies just ignored this small detail and made it seem like T-Rex just naturally had bad eye sight based on movement.
@@sakran2975 yes but they don’t tie this in to T-Rex’s bad eyesight. In the Book, Dr Grant doesn’t expect T-Rex to have bad eyesight. Once he figures this out he speculates it’s due to the frog DNA being introduced. In the movie Dr. Grant acts like it’s natural for T-Rex to have bad eyesight.
Basically yes... Modern day Birds are the direct descendents of dinosaurs... Even Jurassic Park said so... That dinos are birds & that the ppl at Jurassic Park mixed dino DNA 🧬 with frog 🐸 not birds
The title of this video really irks me. I understand it’s dramatic for clickablity, but we weren’t LIED to. We were taught humanity’s best understanding based on the information we had at the time. Then, the information available to us grew, so our understandings changed, cause that’s how science works. It just takes a little while for new understandings to become mainstream as more people learn about the new information. Which is the point of this video, and that’s great, the title just irrationally annoys me.
Like, I can’t believe the ancient Greeks LIED to humanity about health and medicine! Surely they should’ve been aware of germs, viruses, and bacteria that can only be seen with a microscope.
Yup, also the astronaut that was there to film all the rover landings. And those who have traveled to all the celestial bodies and brought us documented filmed evidence of their landscapes. It's all CGI mixed with marvelous theories but yet they are taken as fact and taught that way in schools and universities. Theories build upon theories upon theories, but forced as facts.
Yeah, That’s why SCIENCE exists. And nothing lasts forever. SCIENCE updates over time. So these aren’t lies. They were just “concepts, of dinosaurs”, until they check the truth.
It's better not to trust someone who says "most theropods could fly" and subsequently shows footage of pterosaurs, while also spouting headcanon theories that they "rose above the blast" and survived. The "blast" didn't make the dinosaurs go extinct, the gigatons of ash and dust that was ejected into the atmosphere did.
This is why that paleontologist and schools should kept saying this obvious corrections. The misconceptions are still around and still fooling almost all the people on the world.
Dinosaurs may have sounded more like birds? Lol just imagine sitting in the countryside listening to the soothing sounds of a t-rex singing in the early morning sun xD
If you search for TH-cam videos of what a cassowary sounds like it's very much what you would expect a large dinosaur to sound like. Very low pitched and gutteral, nothing like a typical bird song, and I imagine most dinosaurs were similar (aside from prehistoric birds and olther small theropods). Larger animals tend to make lower pitched noises (e.g. compare a house cat to a lion or tiger).
It was just a joke I didn’t really think a T. rex would sound like a singing bird. But to reply to your comment it is all speculation at the moment as to what a large dinosaur would have sounded like and there is very little evidence at the moment to give any kind of clear indication. So a cassowary is not really what “you’d expect a large dinosaur to sound like” it’s just one of the possibilities as it’s one of the closest related existing animals. A large dinosaur could have just as easily sounded like an elephant or something we just don’t know for sure.
@@David-cv1se 🙄 oh here we go another kid using the clown emoji in the comments. Do you lot call people clowns in real life too or only when you have a keyboard?
It's also important to note that even if we found perfectly preserved Dinosaur DNA frozen within amber like they do in the Jurassic park movies - the actual half-life of animal DNA is only something like 500 years before it completely breaks down. So if you were to bring dinosaurs back today, you would either need to somehow completely recreate most (if not all) of their genetic code from scratch, or fill in a lot of the missing blanks with DNA from other similar creatures. But even then, they wouldn't really be dinosaurs… They’d effectively just be a weird chimera/mish-mash of other animals, or an entirely new species altogether.
@DarkStormHero Yes, it could be. But that doesn't mean that the amber is millions of years old. Amber, even the hardest of it has a low shelf life compared to the millions of years theories that they have programed us with. If anything, fossils found in amber just prove that those species Did Not live "millions and millions" of years ago.
NO LIES. The scientific community is always researching and improving our knowledge of the past as new information and techniques present themselves. Not to be confused with the public's scientific illiteracy, believing things like 'man evolved from monkeys' or 'most scientists thought the earth was flat', which science never said but people still think.
It's absurdly hilarious how these "scientists" continually think all dinosaurs looked the same. There are only about 2100 bones of dinosaurs to date. Extremely limited and in some cases only a vertebrae found. Every animal now has it's distinctive look. Its just hilarious how these scientists think dinosaurs looked like smaller and bigger copies of each other. Probably because they think they were reptiles...which is also another baseless theory they came up with. We have no evidence that a T-Rex was a reptile...but it actually makes more logical sense it is a mammal.
Yeah me too because that would make them even more dangerous because they would be more stealthy. T-Rex might sound like something harmless until all of a sudden it showed up in your area.
Looking at the brontosaurus, I can't help but wonder how long it takes for food to travel down its neck, let alone digest, given that they are herbivores, and those plant fibers have a tendency of getting stuck somewhere if not flushed down.
No doubt they had huge amounts of vegetative matter in their digestive tract at all times. Just a constant flow - hundreds of pounds of leaves and ferns being churned into shit. You could probably track a migrating herd of them for hundreds of miles by the mountains of compost they left in their wake.
As a 5 year old dinosaur enthusianst my mind was boggling these questions. I asked my mom "How could they know which color the dinosaurs were?" I did never get any answers from anyone back then, but now I finally got redemption
Crocodiles are not dinosaurs To be a dinosaur you have to have a few qualifications 1 You Have to be an archosaurs which eliminates everything except for crocodilians and pterosaurs 2 You have to be part of the Avemetatarsilia which eliminates crocs 3 In retrospect is that you have to be member of the dinosauria
0:16 Correction: it’s half-true. Yes, that huge asteroid annihilated MOST of the dinosaurs and 75% of all other life on Earth at the time. No, they didn’t all live in the same place at the same time, and not ALL of them perished right then and there; where else do you think birds came from?
It's amazing how many of these things I wondered about even as a teenager, and it took scientists this long to figure out and start discussing them officially. I used to wonder how they knew dinosaurs weren't warm-blooded, and how they knew all of them laid eggs. I used to wonder where the space was for muscles when they showed the bones next to an overlay of the creature with skin, and why none of them had fat or neck skin flaps like birds or lizards. I used to wonder how they knew they had all skin as opposed to something like fur (though, it turned out to be feathers). It was all of those things they shame you for wondering in school because it goes against the modern perception (a very "stay in the box" way to exploration, I suppose)--only to roll your eyes when they start coming up with those ideas themselves... Not sure if my teenage self would be excited or annoyed by scientists finally discussing it more.😑
There’s a minor correction with the Jurassic Park movie and novel. In both, the main character believed originally that T-Rex had poor eyesight, but learns that that is wrong.
The thing with the eyesight was due to them filling gaps in the DNA with frog DNA. That messed up the eye sight, and made them able to reproduce, because they changed sex.
2:38 1. They were usually very active for their respective sizes. 2. They were all warm-blooded, just like mammals and birds today. 3. They were part of an even bigger group known as Archosauria, which also includes pterosaurs and crocodilians, so depending on how you classify them, they are indeed reptiles.
Tyrannosaurus Rex doesn't have any feathers, big predators usually doesn't have any feathers because they too big to having a feathers example like Tyrannosaurus, Spinosaurus and Giganotosaurus but small predators such as Velociraptors, Pyroraptors and Utahraptor have a feathers.
4:05 1. This “debate” was never taken seriously. 2. Tyrannosaurus rex had the best senses of sight, hearing, and smell in the animal kingdom. 3. The Jurassic Park movie said that T rex really did have poor eyesight, but the book said that it came from the frog DNA that bridged the gaps in her genome.
@@JadenDubissette-u6oIt is 66. It's a super small nitpick so I don't usually correct people, but you are trying to correct someone who is right, so I will this time.
0:00 Truth: All dinosaurs became extinct EXCEPT for the group that evolved into birds 2:32 Truth: Dinosaurs sere all warm-blooded 5:35 Truth: The T rex stood in a slouched postition with its tail held up above the ground 7:35 Truth: Dinosaurs made terrifying noises
If an asteroid hit the planet, Biden would be harkening back to the near-miss when he almost lost his Corvette in a fire. Good thing for disasters in Maui so he could take a walk down memory lane in the middle of all the human suffering to share his near-miss! 🤪
There are many misconceptions that have since been shown to be wrong. That doesn't make them "lies". Although science is frequently finding new evidence of dinosaurs and prehistoric events, much of it remains speculative. Speculation is not "lies"... it may not be accurate and doesn't claim to be. It's simply the best conclusions that can be drawn from available evidence. So here's a 'What If' for you: what if every time you stated something that you believed to be true and was later proved to be incorrect by new evidence was presented as "lies"? Think about it.
Let’s correct the headline shall we. Things we thought we were correct about dinosaurs that new research has proved wrong. It’s science. It’s constantly changing. No one lied.
Plot twist : the dinosaurs actually lived and were kept in zoos until they broke free and raged war against man "Godzilla" but humans went back in time to make sure they went extinct using the space program to aim a meteor at earth before man ever arrived. 👀
No, we were NOT "lied" about anything in paleontology! We were only told what was the best understanding of the fossil record at the time. Science evolves, and paleontology has evolved in huge steps lately thanks to exquisitly preserved fossils found in China since 1984, and several new technologies that make it possible to gather substantially more data from fossils than ever before. The first unequivocal evidence of feathers in a non-avian dinosaur was discovered in China in 1996! Since then, ever emerging new finds have revolutionised our understanding of dinosaur anatomy - and several new avian dinosaur species have been found there, some of which have baffled paleontologists with their wing-feathered legs. One could accuse THIS VIDEO of "lying", since they show repeatedly Pterosaurs while talking about Theropods and "some dinosaurs" that "could even fly". First, Pterosaurs were not dinosaurs at all. Second, they call Theropods a "species", when Theropoda is actually a CLADE, meaning a GROUP of dinosaur FAMILIES that share a common ancestor. And taxonomic families consist of SPECIES. And no, reptiles are NEVER slimy! They are DRY! And what on Earth has a (slimy) toad to do in a dinosaur video????? We don't need any of this kind of nonchalant messing around with science that only confuses people! There's enuff of tinfoil-hat "knowledge" out there already, thank you!
No one lied, if you talking about a movie, it's a movie, if you're talking about things we discovered after a while.. that is science, it's like calling every concealment a lie.
Funny many theropods could fly... yet you show pterosaurs. Which actually weren't dinosaurs at all, and actually did die from the blast. Good job. I'm already done here.
@ricardobertuldo9744in 1:55 the video says t rex is 12 m and brachiosaurus is 13 m like what? Isn't brachiosaurus supposed to be bigger than t rex like 20m or more ?
This is why that paleontologist and schools should kept saying this obvious corrections. The misconceptions are still around and still fooling almost all the people on the world.
0:43 Whoever studied evolution knew that dinosours are evolved into many animals... turtle, crocodile , shark , crabs ...even chickens are their descendent
To be fair Wong explained in first Jurassic world that all Dinosaurs aren’t real 100% accurate dinosaurs as they had to fill up gaps with none Dino DNA. The newer games are even adding featured variants that are more accurate.
4:15: Well, I’m sorry to say this, but, I disagree with everyone that took the movie’s word for it that T-rexes FACTUALLY had bad eyesight. Okay, actually I agree about the fact, but the fact that everyone THINKS that still have a lot of elements to dig deeper into. Because, of course the T-rex had poor eyesight in the JP/JW movies. Did we forget that all these dinosaurs had frog DNA involved? Yes? Well, in the scene where Alan encounters some dinosaurs eggs, he gives out a brilliant explanation about how some types of frogs can change their gender in a single-sex environment. So, if the frog DNA affects the dinosaurs’ genders, and mating rituals, why not their vision, too. Look, frogs can actually only see objects that move. Otherwise, they’ll starve to death if the objects stay still. Frogs can also only focus on some specific objects, so they don’t get to concentrated on what’s not important to them, like shadows. Credit goes to BRIGHT SIDE, and the Jaw-Dropping Facts channel. Man, it’s like the movie didn’t say anything of the sort, but, yet, somehow, only 1 person manages to come up with a theory as to why the movie is so “wrong”.
Me and my brother were *HUGE* dinosaur nerds when we were younger, so I knew most of these facts, apart from the Brontosaurus one. 🦖 When I learned about dinosaurs, it was still widely accepted that Brontosaurus actually was an Apatosaurus. 🦕
We were not "lied to"! Science evolved. Scientists' understanding grew. We learned. I do not believe there was ever any intent to deceive. Why imply falsehood? Our knowledge increases. We learn new things and discard old, falsified notions.
Pop science at its best. Can please explain how they "could fly" in the very beginning? the idea of dinosaurs becoming birds is absolutely stupid and unlogical.
The Lost World book addresses the T-rex eye sight bit. It explains that its not that it cant see you if you stand still, its that like us its sight is drawn to movement during a hunt. the original Rex couldnt see them due to the storm, the lightning was throwing off its "night vision" and tge strong winds were making plenty of movement so a tiny human would be difficult to see, that is also debate that due to its altered genetics that Rexy may have simply had bad sight.
Pterosaurs aren't Dinosaurs, They're Reptiles, the surviving Dino group that evolved into the Birds are called the Maniraptora, the Feathered Theropod was yes true, but not all Some Theropods most likely had little to no feathers since if they were fully feathered their size would cause them to literally overheat to Death, also not all Dinosaurs had feathers, That was a Brachi from JP tho
Again. There is no evolution. Zero. No proof. And the fact that people believe such lies is mind blowing. Without proof, people still believe whatever they are told. Theories based on theories.
Lied about is a big word , as theories evolve as more facts are known . 1980s people thought they where cold blooded , 1990s it changed to warm blooded , The more facts and evidence is discovered the more complete the theories become . .
If people believe the misconceptions then they’re only watching movies and not reading the available data about dinosaurs. That’s not the same as being lied too. Movies are always dramatized, it’s their job. No one believes the eyes thing for a T. rex, that idea is from a movie! 🤦🏻♂️
The t-rex is relatively acceptable, but the velociraptors in the Jurrassic Park movie are a LOT larger than the real ones. Even as a kid, I knew this, being a dino-fanatic. But hell, it's still an awesome movie.
@@HeathenDance the T. rex was portrayed as an apex predator but it’s more of a scavenger. It didn’t really actively hunt. Also it’s thought to have had feathers. Even though there’s the dramatization I actually love the Jurassic park series. Own all the movies and watch them a lot lol dinosaurs are just cool, what can anyone say about them really
That data is flawed the climate for instance during the t-rex time was very warm and the oxygen was higher and the moon was a lot closer so why in TF would a t rex be covered in feathers ? The wooly mammoths had hair because it was cold . These fools don't no anymore than we do
True, but we should also stop normalizing misinformation in entertainment. Sure, there has to be a degree of artistic freedom, but why ignore science when it doesn't affect the plot?
I am 59 years old and knew Dino's had def colors and feathers when I was 6 so why were you not taught this in school? As a mater of fact most of the info on here is old to the old yet the young never knew I guess the left did not want Gen Z to know much.
I was SO happy when it was proved that brontosaurus and apatosaurus were two separate species - brontosaurus means "thunder lizard", which is one of the coolest names ever!🦕
The dinosaurs didn't extinct because of the blast itself. They vanished because of the aftermath of the blast (dust and gases that covered earth preventing sunlight to reach earth, which deteriorated earth vegetation affecting big animals that fed on greens).
To be fair, the T-Rex's bad eye sight was a plot point in the Jurassic Park books due to them adding Frog DNA to fill in the DNA gaps. The movies just ignored this small detail and made it seem like T-Rex just naturally had bad eye sight based on movement.
You beat me to it. The books really nicely cleaned up all the science pretty well.
Frogs have bad eye sight, they just see lights and shadow shapes!
Doesnt the movie say something about frog dna in the slide show presentation?
@@sakran2975 yes but they don’t tie this in to T-Rex’s bad eyesight. In the Book, Dr Grant doesn’t expect T-Rex to have bad eyesight. Once he figures this out he speculates it’s due to the frog DNA being introduced. In the movie Dr. Grant acts like it’s natural for T-Rex to have bad eyesight.
I read somewhere before that the t rex actually had better eyesight than any other creature to ever known to exist
So chickens are dinos.. I'm eating dinosaurs??
Especially if you’re eating the Tyson Dino shaped chicken. We’ve come full circle
Basically yes... Modern day Birds are the direct descendents of dinosaurs... Even Jurassic Park said so... That dinos are birds & that the ppl at Jurassic Park mixed dino DNA 🧬 with frog 🐸 not birds
@@theamateurfurry4735lol
Lmao
If you drink water your drinking Dino piss
The title of this video really irks me. I understand it’s dramatic for clickablity, but we weren’t LIED to. We were taught humanity’s best understanding based on the information we had at the time. Then, the information available to us grew, so our understandings changed, cause that’s how science works. It just takes a little while for new understandings to become mainstream as more people learn about the new information. Which is the point of this video, and that’s great, the title just irrationally annoys me.
Like, I can’t believe the ancient Greeks LIED to humanity about health and medicine! Surely they should’ve been aware of germs, viruses, and bacteria that can only be seen with a microscope.
Also this thumbnail is awful they put the eye where a fenestra is it looks like
It can be seen as lies if we are referring to Hollywood films and their depictions over the years.
Yeh, it seems if new facts are found, every thing we were taught before are then lies. World is getting stranger by the day.
Well, technically we were still lied to..
We gotta appreciate the time traveler who took the time and dedication to film this video
Yup, also the astronaut that was there to film all the rover landings. And those who have traveled to all the celestial bodies and brought us documented filmed evidence of their landscapes. It's all CGI mixed with marvelous theories but yet they are taken as fact and taught that way in schools and universities.
Theories build upon theories upon theories, but forced as facts.
unfunny bro
Camera man never fail
@@jarosawjochemczak768fr
U kidding right?
Speaking of, Megalodon never lived with dinosaurs. The largest shark I know that lived in the Late Cretaceous Period was the 15-foot Ginsu Shark
Yeah, they didn’t. They existed long after that period. 😊
Interesting.
The ginsu shark wasn't 15 foot. It was 6-8 metres so 20 to twenty six feet
Wait - you *knew* the 15-foot Ginsu Shark? How old are you?
we were not lied to. that's what the information that spread at that time, and was available. Science is always improving.
Yeah, That’s why SCIENCE exists. And nothing lasts forever. SCIENCE updates over time. So these aren’t lies. They were just “concepts, of dinosaurs”, until they check the truth.
Thanks for helping my brain with the confusion
It's better not to trust someone who says "most theropods could fly" and subsequently shows footage of pterosaurs, while also spouting headcanon theories that they "rose above the blast" and survived. The "blast" didn't make the dinosaurs go extinct, the gigatons of ash and dust that was ejected into the atmosphere did.
This is why that paleontologist and schools should kept saying this obvious corrections.
The misconceptions are still around and still fooling almost all the people on the world.
No, you were lied to
Dinosaurs may have sounded more like birds? Lol just imagine sitting in the countryside listening to the soothing sounds of a t-rex singing in the early morning sun xD
If you search for TH-cam videos of what a cassowary sounds like it's very much what you would expect a large dinosaur to sound like. Very low pitched and gutteral, nothing like a typical bird song, and I imagine most dinosaurs were similar (aside from prehistoric birds and olther small theropods). Larger animals tend to make lower pitched noises (e.g. compare a house cat to a lion or tiger).
It was just a joke I didn’t really think a T. rex would sound like a singing bird. But to reply to your comment it is all speculation at the moment as to what a large dinosaur would have sounded like and there is very little evidence at the moment to give any kind of clear indication. So a cassowary is not really what “you’d expect a large dinosaur to sound like” it’s just one of the possibilities as it’s one of the closest related existing animals. A large dinosaur could have just as easily sounded like an elephant or something we just don’t know for sure.
An you sound 🤤🤪🤡
@@David-cv1se 🙄 oh here we go another kid using the clown emoji in the comments. Do you lot call people clowns in real life too or only when you have a keyboard?
@DunkinBiscuits If you were man enough to stand in front of me I'd do more than that
It's also important to note that even if we found perfectly preserved Dinosaur DNA frozen within amber like they do in the Jurassic park movies - the actual half-life of animal DNA is only something like 500 years before it completely breaks down.
So if you were to bring dinosaurs back today, you would either need to somehow completely recreate most (if not all) of their genetic code from scratch, or fill in a lot of the missing blanks with DNA from other similar creatures.
But even then, they wouldn't really be dinosaurs…
They’d effectively just be a weird chimera/mish-mash of other animals, or an entirely new species altogether.
They have found dinosaur bones with marrow still intact. That is not possible if they are truly millions of years old.
Evolution is a lie.
so the DNA wouldn't be preserved in a substance like amber?
@DarkStormHero
Yes, it could be. But that doesn't mean that the amber is millions of years old. Amber, even the hardest of it has a low shelf life compared to the millions of years theories that they have programed us with.
If anything, fossils found in amber just prove that those species Did Not live "millions and millions" of years ago.
@@DarkStormHero not for over millions of year's, no.
Instead of this we better save the existing species including human also
NO LIES. The scientific community is always researching and improving our knowledge of the past as new information and techniques present themselves. Not to be confused with the public's scientific illiteracy, believing things like 'man evolved from monkeys' or 'most scientists thought the earth was flat', which science never said but people still think.
Exacto. Exactly.
So man never evolved from monkey ?
We make dinosaurs look so much like their skeletons. But animals don’t necessarily look like their skeletons. We don’t. Especially not in the face
Yes
🎯
It's absurdly hilarious how these "scientists" continually think all dinosaurs looked the same. There are only about 2100 bones of dinosaurs to date. Extremely limited and in some cases only a vertebrae found. Every animal now has it's distinctive look. Its just hilarious how these scientists think dinosaurs looked like smaller and bigger copies of each other. Probably because they think they were reptiles...which is also another baseless theory they came up with. We have no evidence that a T-Rex was a reptile...but it actually makes more logical sense it is a mammal.
Like hippo and rabbits look at their skeletons 😂
@@lexissmith2117 rabbit skeleton looks like a dinosaur lol
Now I want a movie about dinosaurs that sound like little birds, eagles, and crows.
Yeah me too because that would make them even more dangerous because they would be more stealthy. T-Rex might sound like something harmless until all of a sudden it showed up in your area.
Prehistoric planet
Looking at the brontosaurus, I can't help but wonder how long it takes for food to travel down its neck, let alone digest, given that they are herbivores, and those plant fibers have a tendency of getting stuck somewhere if not flushed down.
There are bigger sauropods than the brontosaurus.
No doubt they had huge amounts of vegetative matter in their digestive tract at all times. Just a constant flow - hundreds of pounds of leaves and ferns being churned into shit. You could probably track a migrating herd of them for hundreds of miles by the mountains of compost they left in their wake.
A lot of sauropods like the brontosaurus use to swallow large rocks which would stay in their guts and help them break down and digest food.
Is the brontosaurus back to being a legit species again?
@@Accam570 - Yes. Along with Apatosaurus - two distinct species, rather than one mistaken for the other.
Fun fact:
A T-Rex s closer to us in time than to a stegosaurus. Let that sink in for a sec.
As a 5 year old dinosaur enthusianst my mind was boggling these questions. I asked my mom "How could they know which color the dinosaurs were?" I did never get any answers from anyone back then, but now I finally got redemption
@LifeWithinYourselfNo but I was one back in 1996
Crocodiles are not dinosaurs
To be a dinosaur you have to have a few qualifications
1 You Have to be an archosaurs which eliminates everything except for crocodilians and pterosaurs
2 You have to be part of the Avemetatarsilia which eliminates crocs
3 In retrospect is that you have to be member of the dinosauria
No but they were already around in that time in different size and shapes
0:16
Correction: it’s half-true. Yes, that huge asteroid annihilated MOST of the dinosaurs and 75% of all other life on Earth at the time. No, they didn’t all live in the same place at the same time, and not ALL of them perished right then and there; where else do you think birds came from?
T-Rex with a Mohawk??!!
You son of a gun, I'm in!
This comment deserves more reply’s and likes
it's not a lie, it's just a theory
"Dinosaurs may be extinct from the face of the planet, but they are alive and well in our imaginations." -- Steve Miller
@Jayjay-qe6um NO ME EAT DINOS
*Don't U get it? They're pooping on you car right now!* 🐔🐔
Ever heard of birds cause it doesn't look like
@@pierre-samuelroux9364 no I wanna eat t rex
@@susanpan3761 U DO....were do U think we GOT T-bone steak😋
It's amazing how many of these things I wondered about even as a teenager, and it took scientists this long to figure out and start discussing them officially. I used to wonder how they knew dinosaurs weren't warm-blooded, and how they knew all of them laid eggs. I used to wonder where the space was for muscles when they showed the bones next to an overlay of the creature with skin, and why none of them had fat or neck skin flaps like birds or lizards. I used to wonder how they knew they had all skin as opposed to something like fur (though, it turned out to be feathers).
It was all of those things they shame you for wondering in school because it goes against the modern perception (a very "stay in the box" way to exploration, I suppose)--only to roll your eyes when they start coming up with those ideas themselves... Not sure if my teenage self would be excited or annoyed by scientists finally discussing it more.😑
There’s a minor correction with the Jurassic Park movie and novel. In both, the main character believed originally that T-Rex had poor eyesight, but learns that that is wrong.
The thing with the eyesight was due to them filling gaps in the DNA with frog DNA. That messed up the eye sight, and made them able to reproduce, because they changed sex.
2:38
1. They were usually very active for their respective sizes.
2. They were all warm-blooded, just like mammals and birds today.
3. They were part of an even bigger group known as Archosauria, which also includes pterosaurs and crocodilians, so depending on how you classify them, they are indeed reptiles.
If you ever feel useless,remember t-rex's arms exists
So, this guy 9 months ago....was me??
Tyrannosaurus Rex doesn't have any feathers, big predators usually doesn't have any feathers because they too big to having a feathers example like Tyrannosaurus, Spinosaurus and Giganotosaurus but small predators such as Velociraptors, Pyroraptors and Utahraptor have a feathers.
They did not lie. They just didn't know what they were talking about. 😂
4:05
1. This “debate” was never taken seriously.
2. Tyrannosaurus rex had the best senses of sight, hearing, and smell in the animal kingdom.
3. The Jurassic Park movie said that T rex really did have poor eyesight, but the book said that it came from the frog DNA that bridged the gaps in her genome.
even tho if we could bring the dinosaurs back to life it wouldn't be a good idea since most of them were inteligent, strong and great hunters
If the dating is correct, odds are pretty high that humans are closer in time to the t-rex than the t-rex was to stegosaurus. Time is crazy.
Me 65 million years after : these dinosaurs wings taste good 😅
*66
@@ctenophoractenophora i thought it was 65
@@ctenophoractenophora*65
@@JadenDubissette-u6o 66*
@@JadenDubissette-u6oIt is 66. It's a super small nitpick so I don't usually correct people, but you are trying to correct someone who is right, so I will this time.
0:26
A few could, but the ones you’re thinking of, known collectively as pterosaurs, were from a COMPLETELY separate lineage.
There is a major difference between being lied to and advances in scientific knowledge!
0:00 Truth: All dinosaurs became extinct EXCEPT for the group that evolved into birds
2:32 Truth: Dinosaurs sere all warm-blooded
5:35 Truth: The T rex stood in a slouched postition with its tail held up above the ground
7:35 Truth: Dinosaurs made terrifying noises
Dinosaurs never went extinct. In fact, a dinosaur is serving as president of the US right now.
The sleepy dinosaur
LOLLĹLLLLLLLLLL
If an asteroid hit the planet, Biden would be harkening back to the near-miss when he almost lost his Corvette in a fire. Good thing for disasters in Maui so he could take a walk down memory lane in the middle of all the human suffering to share his near-miss! 🤪
a dinosaur even served US before, right before the dinosaur you're talking about. the man-child dinosaur
You right on dinos never extinct cause birds just birds
The problem with our movies they make these animals too noisy, animals really aren't that noisy in reality because it attracts predators.
Not lied, we just didnt have all the facts
Exacto
There are many misconceptions that have since been shown to be wrong. That doesn't make them "lies". Although science is frequently finding new evidence of dinosaurs and prehistoric events, much of it remains speculative. Speculation is not "lies"... it may not be accurate and doesn't claim to be. It's simply the best conclusions that can be drawn from available evidence.
So here's a 'What If' for you: what if every time you stated something that you believed to be true and was later proved to be incorrect by new evidence was presented as "lies"? Think about it.
In the dark, all dinosaurs are gray.
It is not lies--it is updating information based on the newer discovery--that's how science works
7:11 I once caught a fish THIS big!
😂
Shout out to the cameraman that time travled 300m years to record this
00:26 they survived an impact because they flied above the blast???:D:D
Let’s correct the headline shall we. Things we thought we were correct about dinosaurs that new research has proved wrong.
It’s science. It’s constantly changing. No one lied.
Plot twist : the dinosaurs actually lived and were kept in zoos until they broke free and raged war against man "Godzilla" but humans went back in time to make sure they went extinct using the space program to aim a meteor at earth before man ever arrived. 👀
this is irony right
@@Jay-thetyrant that's a mystery I can't solve
😂😂😂
No, we were NOT "lied" about anything in paleontology! We were only told what was the best understanding of the fossil record at the time. Science evolves, and paleontology has evolved in huge steps lately thanks to exquisitly preserved fossils found in China since 1984, and several new technologies that make it possible to gather substantially more data from fossils than ever before.
The first unequivocal evidence of feathers in a non-avian dinosaur was discovered in China in 1996! Since then, ever emerging new finds have revolutionised our understanding of dinosaur anatomy - and several new avian dinosaur species have been found there, some of which have baffled paleontologists with their wing-feathered legs.
One could accuse THIS VIDEO of "lying", since they show repeatedly Pterosaurs while talking about Theropods and "some dinosaurs" that "could even fly". First, Pterosaurs were not dinosaurs at all. Second, they call Theropods a "species", when Theropoda is actually a CLADE, meaning a GROUP of dinosaur FAMILIES that share a common ancestor. And taxonomic families consist of SPECIES.
And no, reptiles are NEVER slimy! They are DRY! And what on Earth has a (slimy) toad to do in a dinosaur video?????
We don't need any of this kind of nonchalant messing around with science that only confuses people! There's enuff of tinfoil-hat "knowledge" out there already, thank you!
I agree with your point of view
180 million years. That number is extremely humbling
yes, birds are technically theropods, however, the split between avian and non-avian theropods happened long before the end of the cretacious period.
I think it's time for a realistic Jurassic Park
No one lied, if you talking about a movie, it's a movie, if you're talking about things we discovered after a while.. that is science, it's like calling every concealment a lie.
Giving dinosaurs feathers doesn’t make them less scary.
If B developed from A
then B = A
is faulty logic.
By this faulty logic, we are all fish.
This video is inaccurate to say the least. T-Rex didn't have feathers like this, especially not flight feathers as shown in the thumbnail.
Comment from real ID Ross Geller
THANK YOU FOR SAYING IT
Funny many theropods could fly... yet you show pterosaurs. Which actually weren't dinosaurs at all, and actually did die from the blast. Good job. I'm already done here.
This was easily the most accurate dinosaur video you've uploaded.
@ricardobertuldo9744😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@ricardobertuldo9744in 1:55 the video says t rex is 12 m and brachiosaurus is 13 m like what? Isn't brachiosaurus supposed to be bigger than t rex like 20m or more ?
@Amvc8 do you need hearing aids? It says the brachiosaurus was 13 metres tall. Which is true
putting different sound effects over the prehistoric planet stuff is a giant slap in their face lol
This is why that paleontologist and schools should kept saying this obvious corrections.
The misconceptions are still around and still fooling almost all the people on the world.
Imagine editing Jurassic Park to where everytime a dinosaur roared, just dub over birds chirping and tweeting.
Normal human sees crows while zoologist sees dinosaur 😎
0:43 Whoever studied evolution knew that dinosours are evolved into many animals... turtle, crocodile , shark , crabs ...even chickens are their descendent
i hope this is irony if not were doomed
Clearly, dinosaurs are pokemon, going off the thumbnail. 😂
To be fair Wong explained in first Jurassic world that all Dinosaurs aren’t real 100% accurate dinosaurs as they had to fill up gaps with none Dino DNA. The newer games are even adding featured variants that are more accurate.
Oh dear God - Americans! They did not “lie”. Research changes our knowledge of these creatures.
for someone so angry t-rex's have very tiny hands
4:15: Well, I’m sorry to say this, but, I disagree with everyone that took the movie’s word for it that T-rexes FACTUALLY had bad eyesight. Okay, actually I agree about the fact, but the fact that everyone THINKS that still have a lot of elements to dig deeper into.
Because, of course the T-rex had poor eyesight in the JP/JW movies. Did we forget that all these dinosaurs had frog DNA involved? Yes? Well, in the scene where Alan encounters some dinosaurs eggs, he gives out a brilliant explanation about how some types of frogs can change their gender in a single-sex environment. So, if the frog DNA affects the dinosaurs’ genders, and mating rituals, why not their vision, too.
Look, frogs can actually only see objects that move. Otherwise, they’ll starve to death if the objects stay still. Frogs can also only focus on some specific objects, so they don’t get to concentrated on what’s not important to them, like shadows. Credit goes to BRIGHT SIDE, and the Jaw-Dropping Facts channel.
Man, it’s like the movie didn’t say anything of the sort, but, yet, somehow, only 1 person manages to come up with a theory as to why the movie is so “wrong”.
w mans
Lol me as a dinosaur enthusiast "... Both dinosaurs in the thumbnail are incorrect its its meant to be a t rex...."
Me and my brother were *HUGE* dinosaur nerds when we were younger, so I knew most of these facts, apart from the Brontosaurus one. 🦖 When I learned about dinosaurs, it was still widely accepted that Brontosaurus actually was an Apatosaurus. 🦕
Actually all dinosaurs lived together and died together in a flood that covered the earth
No one can tell what a real dinosaur look like.
Exactly 💯
There are dinosaurs that are almost completely reconstructed like Psittacosaurus where even its ass hole is preserved
@@somerandomperson6511I already knew that last fact, but the way you just bluntly said it caught me so off guard.
Just look fricking birds
Just google photos of seagulls.
Says theropod: casually shows a photo of a pterosaur
K so we are eating KFC dinosaurs
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
no bruh
@@Jay-thetyrant 😆😆😆
Kfd 😂
Dinosaurs all green? Sheesh, what do you take us for...? "yawn"
Stopped watching in less than 30s when they say theropods are "one species of dinnosaur"
Nintendo's representation of Bowser and his evil sons were more accurate than mainstream scientists, apparently.
We were not "lied to"! Science evolved. Scientists' understanding grew. We learned. I do not believe there was ever any intent to deceive. Why imply falsehood? Our knowledge increases. We learn new things and discard old, falsified notions.
Pop science at its best.
Can please explain how they "could fly" in the very beginning? the idea of dinosaurs becoming birds is absolutely stupid and unlogical.
If chicken's are dinosaurs...then I'm eating a dino right now while watching this 😂
no chickens are not dinosaurs it every complicated no disrespect tho
Chickens evolved from a common ancestor that was a dinosaur, chickens are not dinosaurs
@@squidwardnosewarts they are dinosaur because you CAN'T. EVOLVE. OUT OF. A CLADE.
The Lost World book addresses the T-rex eye sight bit. It explains that its not that it cant see you if you stand still, its that like us its sight is drawn to movement during a hunt. the original Rex couldnt see them due to the storm, the lightning was throwing off its "night vision" and tge strong winds were making plenty of movement so a tiny human would be difficult to see, that is also debate that due to its altered genetics that Rexy may have simply had bad sight.
NO ONE HAS EVER LIED ABOUT DINOSAURS!!! THEY SIMPLY JUST "RECENTLY" DISCOVERED THAT DINOSAURS HAD FEATHERS! "YoU WeRe LiEd!" Come on come on
0:53
1. This debate was NEVER taken seriously.
2. The next image is of a lizard.
So chickens are dinos.... Mean i am eating dinasours , is i am T Rex 😂
thats not how that works
Uhh wat
Theropoda is not a species. It’s s family of dinosaurs.
Pterosaurs, mosasaurs and plesiosaurs are not dinosaurs.
Not all sauropods are brontosaurs.
Pterosaurs aren't Dinosaurs, They're Reptiles, the surviving Dino group that evolved into the Birds are called the Maniraptora, the Feathered Theropod was yes true, but not all Some Theropods most likely had little to no feathers since if they were fully feathered their size would cause them to literally overheat to Death, also not all Dinosaurs had feathers, That was a Brachi from JP tho
Again. There is no evolution. Zero. No proof. And the fact that people believe such lies is mind blowing. Without proof, people still believe whatever they are told. Theories based on theories.
T-Rex skipped arm day
Title states "Things You Were Lied to About Dinosaurs'' but uses the words probably, most likely, may have been. Speculation like all videos.
A lot of People Paleontology is speculation with facts backing it. It's hard to be 100% sure about many things.
My favorite Dinosaur is the Troodon groups.
Lied about is a big word , as theories evolve as more facts are known . 1980s people thought they where cold blooded , 1990s it changed to warm blooded , The more facts and evidence is discovered the more complete the theories become . .
The ones that survived didn't make it through it because they could fly above the blast. That's so absurdly ridiculous.
Flying dinosaurs are not dinosaurs they are pterosaurs
Where do you get all the videos sourced?
'we were lied to' 😂🤣🤦 no we just didnt know!
I’m one minute into this and I can say I’m honestly suprised at how accurate this video is. Great job man 👍
i hope this is irony
If people believe the misconceptions then they’re only watching movies and not reading the available data about dinosaurs. That’s not the same as being lied too. Movies are always dramatized, it’s their job. No one believes the eyes thing for a T. rex, that idea is from a movie! 🤦🏻♂️
The available data about dinosaurs is guesswork. It can't be proved or disproved.
The t-rex is relatively acceptable, but the velociraptors in the Jurrassic Park movie are a LOT larger than the real ones. Even as a kid, I knew this, being a dino-fanatic. But hell, it's still an awesome movie.
@@HeathenDance the T. rex was portrayed as an apex predator but it’s more of a scavenger. It didn’t really actively hunt. Also it’s thought to have had feathers.
Even though there’s the dramatization I actually love the Jurassic park series. Own all the movies and watch them a lot lol dinosaurs are just cool, what can anyone say about them really
That data is flawed the climate for instance during the t-rex time was very warm and the oxygen was higher and the moon was a lot closer so why in TF would a t rex be covered in feathers ? The wooly mammoths had hair because it was cold . These fools don't no anymore than we do
True, but we should also stop normalizing misinformation in entertainment. Sure, there has to be a degree of artistic freedom, but why ignore science when it doesn't affect the plot?
I am 59 years old and knew Dino's had def colors and feathers when I was 6 so why were you not taught this in school? As a mater of fact most of the info on here is old to the old yet the young never knew I guess the left did not want Gen Z to know much.
It’s crazy how people really traveled back in time just to get video footage of these dinosaurs!😮
I was SO happy when it was proved that brontosaurus and apatosaurus were two separate species - brontosaurus means "thunder lizard", which is one of the coolest names ever!🦕
I love this channel ❤
Sadly this channel is dead
@@dudedude-su7pt thats good
2:18 where do you get that footage..looks 😍
The dinosaurs didn't extinct because of the blast itself. They vanished because of the aftermath of the blast (dust and gases that covered earth preventing sunlight to reach earth, which deteriorated earth vegetation affecting big animals that fed on greens).
How does one prove the past? To a 100% certainty?
4:36
That’s not what it sounded like in that show.
Hollywood just made t-rex and dinosaur sounds Godzilla
When did dinos roared like godzilla??
Being a decendent of a Toruk Makto, I can confirm this. Also the actual footage used in this video, was filmed by my great granddad.