I am from NE and want to add that separatist of NE(Abrahamics/Maoists) refer to India to the west as “Mainland India" as if we are some people who are not supposed to be part of India. The thing is; Akhand Bharat to the east is The Mainland because it is the region where Hinduism is most populous. Mainland Hinduism is NE India(Buddhism is not a religion seperate from Hinduism)
Bruh 😂 we aren't Chinese. The region where hans live is known as mainland China and the other occupied nations by China is known as parts of China. From North to South and from west to East, there's only one India and the people living in it are indians. 🙌
Actually, while there are many similarities and overlaps between Hinduism and Buddhism, they are their own religions. Due to the nature of Hinduism and Buddhism, you could be a 'mix' of them, but it would be wrong to say they are one and the same.
@@TheDAKing5 Yes it is different but part of Sanatan Dharma. I use Hinduism as a umbrella term for faiths that is not Abrahamic(as our constitution does)
i am from Sikkim and we are the Bhutia community , since childhood i ve been told that we were originally from bhutan. there is a small hamlet called "HAA" and once the haa community had huge disageements with the kingdom hence were exiled from the kingdom. since sikkim was near by bhutan and the haa community took refuge at sikkim. i dont know how much truth lies in this story.but still its a mystery.
Hi Kessang! I m here from Uttarakhand, here too live Bhutia/Bhotia peoples. Mostly on Tibetan border areas of our state. There are considered ST here. One of my friend was from Pithoragarh district of Uttarakhand and he once told me before China's conquest of Tibet they used to do commerce with Tibetan people and most probably his ancestors came from Tibet too. Here is an interesting thing about Bhotias of our state - from those who live in Garhwal region of Uttarakhand follow Buddhism but in Kumaon region they follow Hinduism. Offcourse they they have their very unique traditions and attires unlike other hill men of Uttarakhand.
@@rajpaudel246 sikkim has three main communities mainly Lepchas , Bhutias and Nepalese. they live peacefully n maintains a very cordial relationship. it is said and well known truth that Lepchas are the original inhabitants of sikkim. likewise Bhutias and Nepalese they migrated from the bodering countries like Nepal and Tibet. there are three languages spoken by sikkemese ppl Nepali which is spoken by Nepali ppl, Lepcha which is spoke by Lepchas and "lhokay" / "bhotay" spoken by Bhutia ppl. but the common language spoken by the sikkemese ppl is Nepali. speaking only nepali language does nt mean you are Nepali. likewise speaking only french does not mean tou are french citizen. one thing i wanted to know by leaving my comment is to know the history of bhutia ppl cause i belong to bhutia community, and among bhutia also i belobg to lachungpa tribe which is same like bhutia community but the language has lik differences. it has been said that bhutias had migrated from tibet but the small tribe called "Lachungpas" could have been migrated from Bhtanese small hamlet called "HAA" cause i hve personally visited the HAA and i found no diferences in the living style, the language, the culture, the physical stature eveyrthing is very similar.
also mr@raj paudel this is to your kind information sikkim is the intergral part of the grt nation called India/Bharat. yes before merging with this grt nation sikkim was a independent country/kingdom.it was only on 16th May, 1975 that Sikkim officially merged with the Indian union and became the 22nd state of the country.
@@dreamer_deer babur, tamerlane and the mughal empire...they all claimed ancestry from the mongols and especially chingis khaan....mughal means f**king mongol in persian....ethnic mongols
If northeast people marriage north indian then a better racial child born. Their eye size increase, Fair skin color, Cheeks and jaws are perfect and tall height, good stamina.
I am from NE and belong to upper assam and when I was in my primary school we learned about caste system but it was hard for me to imagine it cause the book says that all the Hindus were once part of the caste system. Where here even my tribe, who follow Hinduism were not part of the caste system. I think the books should mention about which empire or dynasty the system was applied. My tribes ancestor were the high priests according our floks and even in google. And we are native to the region of upper assam and lower arunachal.
we have to unlearn the lies/ fake info that the education system teaches us and explore and find out the truth ourselves. That's the only way we'll ever keep being united as one nation. I personally believe that caste system is nothing but a joke that's forcefully imposed upon us, don't you think so too? We ARE one, but divided by this stupid system... that makes people more self-conscious and causes infighting
We are hindus for not long. That's why we weren't part of the caste system. This video is only propagating akhand bharat theory which didn't exist before 1826(in case of NE India).
For this you have to understand hinduism from the perspective of the assamese vaishnavite society there is no cast system in vaishnavism except for the people who still follow brahmin influenced rituals caste system do exist
@@fungusamongus.76 Would you say Kalitas have a caste ? And if they don't, how come they fall in the category of upper caste ? Because Kalitas are vaishnavites and follow Ekxoron Naam Dhormo
Tai people were originally from different parts of Thailand, Yunan, and Myanmar... There are 6 Tai communities in India, Tai Ahom, Tai Khamti, Tai Phake, Tai Aiton, Tai Khamyang and Tai Turung.
Regarding tai ahoms, the present day ahom people are nothing but Aryans carrying ahom surnames and titles, only the Royal Family and a tiny percentage of ahom population can claim themselves to be actual ahoms carry ahom bloodlines.
My father researched about our community a long time age and he found that our ancestors are from Mongolia. He had published a book long time ago and it already got out of stock. He handed the Copyright to the Central Government and it's listed in the official government site too.
Most of us Zo people (Chin-Kuki-Mizo people) have done 23andme My Heritage DNA test and most of the results show that we're 70-75% Chinese and Vietnamese,5-10% Nepali and the rest being Mongol, Inuit, Finnish, Italian and Central Asians. Among these Nepali I've mentioned, most of them were Tibeto-Burman language speakers and were not Indo-Aryan language speakers. Our ancestors were followers of Sakhua. Sakhua can only be followed by a pure Zo descent. No other ethnic groups can practice it. That's why, interracial marriage was very less in the olden days.
@@biswaranjanmallick7407 southern Chinese, basically from yunan and Vietnam. Austro-asiatic people, the Y-DNA haplogroup of mizos such as lushai is 85% O2a which is austro-asiatic, found in yunan, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and tribes of Phillipines.
If I may ask what was your Maternal Haplogroup? cuz I also took the test and found out that my maternal haplogroup originated from the tibetian and burman region, I am from the south part of India, and found it very interesting that my mother's side originate from somewhere in that region.
Let alone who live in modern India, if you even live in Europe and the Americas, chances are you're actually Indian. All the migration happened from here, Originating from Africa, after centuries of settling down in India, different clans migrated towards the other parts of the world.
We(historians) may be wrong about that life originated in Africa & all our ancestors travelled from Africa to all over India. Proper Survey & Study has not been carried out in Indian subcontinent. May be someday, new data can be obtained.
While studying in Delhi I was asked many times if I was from China, Japan etc and I would say yes, I'm not from India. It's embarrassing to be called an Indian if they don't accept me as one.
I feel sorry for u........but u should consider urself as indian...... foreign forces are trying to separate NE , J&K ,etc ......by doing so u r making it easy for them......and those who live in central India are also unknowingly supporting those separatist ideology......
@jojores180 people like you are the reason i am starting to give up faith on democracy, sharing equal representation with dumb****s like you is unbearable. how is the comment above you victim blaming? do you even know what that is?
@@knockout1975 You should proud to be an Indian. No matter how many times they ask your nationality. Always remember you are an Indian as much as I am.
Note that many of today's north eastern states were not part of the so-called pan-indian civilisation until the British incorporated them into British india. Assam have long lost its identity and is today full of Bangladeshis and Indian caucasoids from other parts of the country. A better example is Arunachal pradesh and Tripura (until very recently). Unfortunately Tripura is also being overrun by Bangladeshi refugees.
Assamese is not all east asian looking tribals. Assamese is an indo-aryan language and the culture is majorly indo-aryan. Assam is a melting pot of cultures. It is not a hill state, majority of it is plains. I myself belong to a mongoloid ethnicity.
I don't know about people but the land of NE is part of Vedic civilization for sure. There is a place called Parshuram Kund which is where Lord Parshuram took bath to remove his curse. There is an ancient Shiva Linga also in Arunachal. And it is part of our Vedic history. Another example is Chitrangada which is said to be from manipur , we certainly don't have proof of that but the Parshuram kund and Shiva Linga is direct archaeological proof. So maybe the people migrated here later.
@@shayanraj7840 There were surely interactions between people of the northeast and mainland India just like there were interactions with itinerant tribals who passed through the lands inhabited by Vedic people (many of whom adopted Vedic culture and lost their original language) but that doesn't substantiate the claim that Indians are all the same people and all the lands which are today part of India were also a part of Vedic civilisation? Many people would beg to differ with the notion that Indians are all the same people and we OUGHT to unite under one religion, one language and one civilisation.
@@shayanraj7840 depends on what you mean by "outsiders". If by outsiders you mean by current geographical boundaries then yes, Greeks are outsiders because we don't have even a sizable population of people of Greek descent today in India so by modern standards they are outsiders. When the population of today's outsiders becomes sizable enough to influence and finally take over the region demographically, they are no longer considered outsiders by the future generations of people who lived there before the latter came. Nobody is native anywhere because humans keep moving across different lands.
Genetically NE people do not share mainland india DNA. Some similarities are there because of intermixing between different races. But telling that we come from the same root is just absurd. Khasia people of meghalaya are related to the cambodians, naga and munda people have come from the Philippines(many milennium ago) , bodo people from Tibetan region, tai people from yunnan and burma. How can they share same gene with the mainland indians apart from the intermixed ones?
True, many dna ancestry test results of northeast people are on TH-cam , they show mostly Chinese -vietnamese, Thai/khmer , Mongolian and very few South Asian ancestry
The Indian gene is also found in SE Asia 😂. I carry Indian genes and I am Filipino. Its because of mixing genes and intermarriage betweem Aryans and Mongoloids. We did evolve from the same race. The Indian gene is found throughout Malaysia, Philippines and Indonesia from Indian immigration to the area.
When u come in Uttrakhand, Nepal and Himachal Pradesh so there are all ethnicity groups like Dravid, Indo-Iranian, Aryan and Tibeto-Burmese. Now, we are all engaged to each others.
The lower caste people have Dravidian features (90 percentage) because of kols ancestory Whereas upper caste ( Brahmins khastriyas) belongs to Caucasian ( khas Aryans) or indo aryans or mongoloids in uttarakhand( 90 percentage)
I am from Assam, A Kalita by Caste and my ancestors were from Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh, who later migrated to Assam, so not all NE are Mongoloid as most people believe to be.. I have never seen any instance of Racism during my 5 years in Delhi instead they get shocked to see a tall guy with beard to be from Assam as they have this mindset that all NE people look chinese
@@tjzuffa534 no. Abhijeet sir has no basis. We still have oral recitations of how we migrated from mongolia to central China to Himalayas and arunachal. He must have checked the dna of some mixed race people of assam ,indo aryan mongoloid race mixed. We are still pure mongoloid race with no dilution in genes. Especially, arunachal, nagaland, mizoram, some sections of tripura, assam, meghalaya and manipur tribals etc
@@AdishDebbarma Why you deny your own race Is it because you wanted to accepted by others so bad If you are ashamed of reality then you are literally nothing
@@AdishDebbarma ah yes calling it "colonial" does the rest of the work for you... Linguistics is considered a science because we can objectively substantiate its claims not because some Wh-ite blonde man from the British empire thought languages have a common origin.
I used to identify myself Indo-mongloid & i always had doubt using the term but from today I'll identify myself as indo-tibetian or indo-tibetian-barman
i think you should identify your self as an indian nothing else you have the same origin of linguistics as tebietian barman because it also used to be india and that linguistica originated from ne india where you are and then spread to tibet...so you are pure indian your language should change how you identify your self
@@meh2007 Tibeto-burmese languages came from india and spread to Tibet😂? Now this is some next level of indo-cen-trism. Not even 18th and 19th century european historians were that Euro-cen-tric about their claims. The origin of the Tibeto-Burman speakers was located in the upper course of Yangtse and the Haong Ho (Yellow) rivers in North West China and it should not bother you at all because many of today's north-eastern states were only incorporated into india by the British in the 19th century.
Every state in india joined the union on gun point. First by the British then by INC leaders. You are not telling anything new. But remember one thing without the union we would have no identity and importance on the world stage.
@@terraminsan7392 Also there is mention of The Kingdom "Pragjyotishpur(Sanskrit: प्रागज्योतिषपुर)" Which comprised North-eastern states of India and some part of Tibet Son of Pandu Arjun married the princess of Pragjyotishpur known as "Chitrangada Sanskrit: चित्रांगदा)"
We northeast,India...are not pure India...our food,culture,dress,look...different from mainland Indian...we northeast ...come from Yunnan province China,Thailand,mynmmar,phillipinese,Vietnam,loas,Cambodia,Japan,...we are sino_Tibetan spoken language So stop saying us DAT we are pure India...nooooooooooooo...we are not .
@@hewas_chewasky our forefather come from Yunnan province ....so who r living in Yunnan province actually they r not Chinese peoples...they r Thai n Tibetan...100%...
@@hewas_chewasky we are not mix with Indian ok...we are mix Thai n burmese....u search for Nagaland. ..ok...our elder say DAT we are come from thailand to yunnan province to northeast,india
@@hewas_chewasky u are ryt...but not all east India...only Assam,Tripura they ppl look like Bangladesh or west Bengal...but Nagaland,arunachal Pradesh,Manipur,Mizoram look pure Asian Feature...I'm from Nagaland we are look like Thai.
Arjun's wife chitrangada was from manipur, bheem's wife hidimba was from cachar, assam. NE has been contributing to the rich past since the ancient time.
@@ashukr2038 Tradition states that Hidimba belonged to the great Bamun family of Nalbari(Assam)kamrup of which the Dimasa tribal people are descendants of.
@@ajatashatru4198 , Brahmin is indo-Aryan concept And Dimasa are Tibeto-burman not indo aryan. So Dimasa can't be descendents of Brahmin (indo-aryan) fake sanstritaitsrion of North East India tribe.
@@jibokomiuli we just now classified that the indo aryan concept of brahminisation isnt a concept at all and there are assamese brahmins called bamuns in axomiya
#AskAbhijit Sir right now this is the period when Ambubachi mela in Assam's Kamakhya Temple happens. But due to pandemic this year it has been cancelled. Sir, what is the history of Kamakhya Temple and What is this festival's significance? During this period for 4 days we shouldn't cut tress, cut leaves, dig holes on ground... Why? Please answer if you know❤
Kamakhya peeth was originally a tribal shrine, not hindu. During the medieval period, garo priests used to do the ceremonies there, not the hindu priests. After adoption of hindu religion by the local rulers, this temple was converted into a hindu one. You may also know that Shiva wasn't a hindu deity either. He was a kirati deity.
Kamakhya temple was reconstructed during Koch king Narayan 1565, current structure rebuilt by Ahom king Rudra Singha (reign 1696 to 1714) and Siba Singha (1714 to 1744) with remnants of earlier Koch temple carefully preserved
I beg to differ... I think the Northeast Region needs to be studied differently as it is a very complex region... Every state is complex... This region is like a junction of all races arround.. The Khasis are Austro Asiatic and are the oldest inhabitants of India... Assamese are a part of Vanga People which split into Bengalis Odiyas and Assamese... Others are mostly Tibeto Burman.... Sir I would request you to Study...
@@rvd597 A melting pot is very optimistically put. It brings along a lot of uneasiness and contempt among communities as well. Also you are talking about language groups. These are not races my friend. Linguistic groups do not represent an ethnicity. Its good that NE promotes it’s tourism and culture via this so called ‘tribal heritage’, ‘headhunters’ etc. But it is not indicative of the whole region. There are various pastoral communities, who don’t share that history. For example Assamese, they are mostly farmers, others are jhum cultivators for generations, for example Bengalis. Are you gonna say Bengali as a ‘tribe’? For me there are only 5 states in the NE with a very different cultural root than that of mainland India. Assam and Tripuri culture is very similar to mainland Indian culture. Manipur is heavily influenced by Hinduism, but yet they maintain that princely state heritage and history. I might be wrong, here but from what I know it’s like that in the NE.
@@KukiCrusader all states in NE are not just carved out of assam, they were carved out because they were never part of assam. Brush up your history, assam(axom) is only the brahmaputra valley. The other areas were all tribal and hilly areas, the map of ahom kingdom is Assam. After subjugating ahom(assam), the Britishers charged towards jaintia hills, khasi hill, garo hills, NC hills & manipur, mikir hills etc. And lastly tripura, these tribal areas along with assam(ahom) was deemed as one British administrative zone and they named it after ahom(assam). The tribals areas were put under "partially excluded areas" where indians without British permission wouldn't be able to enter. Even today in assam, there are still two tribal areas called as dima hasao(NC hills) and mikir hills(karbi anglong) where the Assamese and outsiders cannot settle or buy land, the Assamese language isn't used here. And the people are governed by autonomous rule and not by assam government. In the past numerous times assam has tried to impose it's dominance or control over tribal areas , similar to what's happening in mizoram and manipur. The mizo government is trying to gain control over lai, mara and chakma autonomous areas and manipur over the tribal areas of it's place. This led to states being carved out again and again. Even right now, the karbis and dima hasao people aren't happy with Assamese policies to establish control on the region
I'm from Bodo tribe which worships God Shiva and this Northeast Indian region which was known as Kamrup before was ruled by the Bodo kachari king Narkasur who has a very interesting stories about how strong and fearsome he was that he can lift and spread the giant trees to two pieces just by using his hands 😅 after his reign some royal family desputes happen and ahoms invaded us so now it's ...
@LAZY Assam our major population lives in the north bank of the Brahmaputra river below the foothills of Bhutan and Arunachal Pradesh which region is Called BTR consist of five districts, future proposed state we have our own Autonomous electoral system. 🙂
@LAZY yeah i guess we were neglected back then but now it's kind of reviving again slowly and more tourist are coming these days so slowly it will become a major tourist spot in future coz most of the northeastern lands are still untouched and filled with natural beauty and mountains etc. With cool weather.😁
Iam from nagaland,ya,much is not known about the geneology of our ancestors,however,the traditions goes by,we are purely migrated from Mongolia to China and again migrated to Burma,and thereby Manipur and scattered northeast abroad.
If im as much as Indian as you, then why do i get asked literally by every person who saw me in Delhi whether im a foreign student from China or Japan.
Bro it's india 16% of world population is here so very much possible many mentally cracked roaming in various parts of our country and so please ignore them they might not even know the spelling of our country
As he said the education system that had been continuing for such a long time( we see some changes in education policies NOW hoping to see something in favour of this issue) didnt educate the people about the north east india .. so people have no idea about the people and the culture..even when people from punjab go to other states like gujrat punjab and others go to any foreign land alot of times they guess the ethinicity to be saudi arabian , pakistani, etc. i mean ik even we feel bad at that time… you guys being called so in your own country might feel way worse.. and i am really against it.. but its also not easy for indians to guess who is from where.. alot of times people from punjab are called rajanthani just if they feel appearance is not what the stereotype is.. Me coming from a kashmiri hindu background have heard alot of poeple commenting on my friends due to their very fair skin that they dont look indian..so i believe there is no harm in telling them from where you are ..as its not easy to guess .. and im compeletly against the racism if someone from NE experiences it.. though i have seen quite a change.. i think the bullying has reduced.. correct me if im wrong
Genetically some Assamese may be similar to the mainland Indian due to migration but I don't think we can generalise and conclude that NE people have similar genes.
Can you give a link to the study which makes you claim that they(North East Indians) have the same genes as other Indians from different parts? I want to have a look at where the sample is taken because that can make a huge difference, for example, Assam, where they intermingle more with, for a lack of a better word, Central India longer which includes the Bengalis, it might make sense that there will be same genetic markers present there more compared to other states that live more in isolation.
He can't prove it cuz it's not true. I, a meetei of Kangleipak and other kangleichas have east asian and southeast asian genes and this is thoroughly researched and proven in lots of studies.
There is one doubt here. During the 15-16th CE, a large amount of mainland Indian influx started if wrong please correct me. But the idea is that it would be a very much possibility that Indian genes and NE indigenous peoples genes got mixed up and spreaded. I am from Manipur and we have a section of surnames that belongs to the class of Brahmins which we call Bhamon. And traditionally, we have 7 groups which is normally understood as clans called Yek-Salai. Now, if we do tracing of these, many of hill tribes of Manipur come under this along the major tribe the Meiteis. I believe in other states also this kind of structure is found which has not originated from Hinduism.
I am from India. I am North Indian of Marathi descent. Both of my parents are from Maharashtra. Accurately speaking, from Eastern part of Maharashtra. But father said he is from Border part of Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. + I checked on Internet that I have Turkic ancestry too. How this can be possible?
I don't know when it started. But I'll try to answer how it happened. Firstly, it didn't happen only because of the British - yes, they made it worse. Let me give you an analogy. Suppose there's a poor guy who's from upper caste and there's a rich guy who's also from upper caste. The rich guy won't treat the poor guy same way as he would do to other rich people. Why? Because of socio-economic differences. And this creates a hierarchy in which rich are treated fairly and poor badly (doesn't matter if they're an upper caste Hindu or lower). So, in the same way, people back then who got rich suppressed the poor for generations, so that the poor people remain poor and lower rank in social-economic hierarchy. Therefore, the people who remained poor for generations got a label, dalit or achhut, by rich.
@@sene7767 Did you find me saying that it didn't exist before that? I didn't give any evidence based answer, I just came up with my one, so it doesn't have to be correct. I just tried to explain how it might have been created. And cite your sources.
@@powerhousebikki You also didnt site your sources and you forgot people who often moved between states changed there Varana and the British restricted movement between states and made a registry rigidifing the fluidity of caste identities AND ORIGINALY JATTI HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH VARNA ITS A 5 CENTRY CORRUPTION.
Tibeto-Burman is also from where the Sinitic branch or the so called Chinese languages also arise. But the origin lies in North-East since the highest genetic & linguistic(language) diversity of the Sino-Tibetean branch is here and it is from here that the migrations to China happened. Most Chinese don't have a pale or yellow skin, especially the Southern Hans who are darker and have looks closer to the Aboriginals. Han Chinese is an ethnicity which has absorbed various earlier cultures and should not be seen as a homogeneous single origin ethinicity or culture. The Southern Hans are more Austro-Asiatic and Astronesians in looks and genetics (rather than Turkic or Mongolic which is dominant in Northern Hans and understandably so, because of the migrations of these pastoral Hunas, proto-turks and proto-mongols from the deep tundra forests of northern Siberia), much like the people of South East Asia and have been absorbed by an evolving Han Chinese tribal identity with each heaven mandated conquest. FYI, Much of Central Asia today is Indian & Iranian maternally in gentics as the Hunas, Turks & later Mongols overran the region in various waves, killing men and taking their women as their wives or concubines and thus creating new ethnicities! Also P.S. The whole Mongoloid feature stems from the Denisovan mixing with already mixed Homo Spaiens & Neanderthals, based on current theories of migration(should not be considered as ethched into stone since these theories sometimes change over time due to new evidences from various allied fields of study).
The mongoloid features are already present in Africa where our mongoloid ancestor originated. Look at the khoi san for example they got mongoloid features too.
@@littleninjavangchhia9099 but khoi San has no affinity to East Asian people. The Europeans especially the blondes have higher genetic affinity to East asians. The development of mongoloid features or monolid isn't limited to East asians
Sir, In the past NE India was home to many tribes for a long time where many kingdoms flourished and got wiped but after british rule ended we became a part of India just like every other region of India. Here, most of the tribes are having mongoloid facial features and they have mixed genes. Sir, I would like to say that the tribes of North eastern regions are feeling insecure in their own lands many illegal Bangladeshis are taking our own lands we tribal people are becoming minority in our own land just as in the case of Tripura, we tribal peoples feel that government of India donot respect us they are wanting us to come under Bangladeshi rule and other states people are becoming more in terms of population in our own state of Assam. The demography of the state is changing and will harm the tribal people on ground level as many of the tribal people are uneducated in worldly knowledge. The tribal communities of Assam feel disrespected by other communities in their own lands we feel like puppets used by governments for their own benefits not really understanding the peoples demands. We feel we are under dictatorial rule in our own land. I personally think anyone can come and go in any state of India but by destroying the native peoples culture, heritages is not acceptable and moreover the Demographic changes is too fast for many tribal people on ground level. We tribal people want more states in NE Indian region protected under Constitution of India and people of India so that we can prosper at faster rates with our own tribal leaders who understand our tribal people.
Mongolian ethnicity, refer to people who have facial and colour similarities of the Mongolian, the word Mongolian ethnicity does not refer to the mongols, the word has been used mainly, because of the easy analytic reference to a type of ethnicity. The swath of geography from North East Pakistan all the way to to East of polynesia, Canada and the whole of Americas , down to the tha south east asia were of the mongol ethnicity. India has aryan, dravidian and mogolian ethnicity. Indian continent had many kingdoms, it was not a monogeneous nation until the independence in 1947. North East Indians are mongol ethnicity, the North West and Central India are of Aryans ethnicity. While North of Pakistan has a mix of caucasian and mongol ethnicity. None of the ethnic races are any superior to the other. For any one to believe that they are a superior ethnicity have a inferiority complex.
@Quiet Professional life is so easy, knowledge is at the tip of ones finger. Google what you need to know. More interesting is that one gets educated, with each debate. My post bear no malice, or comparison to any onces ethnicity, we are all equal in this wonderful world.
Im not sure abt N.E. states but we Arnchlee espclly northrn region r genetclly mogoloids descends not Aryan but as a nationality we true Indians. Dnt spread this misconceptions...sir what u said is rong espclly for da people of Arnchl prdsh.I agree nowdays due intrction like inter-state marriages ,certainly thre might little connction wid mainland indians.
Mughals came to loot and spread their religion and belief unlike British. Ofcourse, there were missionaries from England but that wasn't their main objective.
Because they don't want to be slaves of Arabs again so they pay jajiya to arabs and forced hindus to pay jaiya to practice thier language, same done with Irani parsian people later so called afgani .
People mostly who are in a misconception should know that india as one nation didnt existed before mughal and british invasion, prehistorically there were no official borders unlike today, after gaining indpendence different ethnic tribal land of north east were also included as a part of india, language and ethnicity was always there...the term tibeto burman or mongolian were originated by british...it doesnt mean you have come all the way from mongolia or burma...calm down
They are Mongoloids over all some with Caucasoid And Australoid admixtures in them whether they like to admit to it or not. Not too much Negroid though because The Siddhis are mostly in Western India yeah.
My DNA shows 42% Tibeto Burmese , 40% southern Chinese (Yizu Tribe), 15 % Malay & 2% others. Most of the north East Indians belong to Austronesian & Austroasiatic race. We are not Aryan admixture (except tai Ahom of Assam & meiteis of Manipur having admixture of genes post conversion to Hinduism) as depicted in your video. My ancestors migrated from Yunnan province somewhere 1000BC - 200 BC
People need to learn the difference between "Mongoloid" (referring to the race, wherein the concept of "race" is itself flawed) and "Mongolian" (ie. of Mongolian nationality). As a fellow northeasterner, if we must refer to ourselves as anything other than our nationality, we must refer ourselves in terms of ethnicity rather than race bc race is nothing but a prejudiced and flawed system and as far as i know based primarily on physical characteristics of a population as opposed to ethnicity and genetics. I've come across a lot of fellow northeasterners like myself who often say that they're "mongolians" when they actually mean they're ethnically sino-tibetan or tibeto-burman for example.
NE peoples belong to many races especially Mongoloid peoples and we all have different ethnicity but because we live in Indian and are born in India we should consider ourselves as Indian :) our cultures may not be like other Indian peoples like Dravidians or Indo-Aryans still we should consider ourselves as Indian
Culture is quite similar if we look half full if water and it's different as much as states of India differes ,Karnataka is not similar of Kerala ,and Kerala is not similar of tamilnadu ,even the fingers of our hand are not same .Keeping philosophy apart ,we the Indians form west ,south and north love our north east brothers as much as we love among ourselves .You are always beats in our heart ,what ever the study says .
No..my friend as much as we are Indian but we are not in our blood...as alot of North East India have done a DNA test not one of their DNA are related to Indian but 70%are connected to China /Vietnam and some others but not Indian...thnks
Most Tibetans are mongoloid origin. If Northeast people are considered Tibeto-Burman; in that case we can say they are mongoloid origin. It does make sense here. Facts should be responsibly delivered not manipulated because of Geo-politics scenario. North-east is a part of India now and we cannot claim ourselves of our origin. There's chances we may land up in Africa if we do so very seriously.
Brother India is vast if you compare north Indian with south Indian they very different looks same it goes with north east peoples but looks doesn't matter
Brother I know why you are thinking "he is saying this because of geopolitics" because government doesn't look at northeast that much But Just think British had left us with non We didn't have advanced technologies, and money to develop it Because it is extremely forest area
Why most of Tibetans came to India?why they don't go to Mongolia, Myanmar,Thailand,Vietnam?After china occupied tibet because we are people with same culture also they feel more closely to us Looks doesn't matter
India's prehistoric boundaries (before 4000 yrs) stretch from present day Iran in west to present Myanmar in east, and from today's China occupied Tibet in north to Shri Lanka in south.
That doesn't justify anything borders change every decade but the true natives and tribes who had been living there since thousands of years doesn't change there customs and ethnicity and so the origin stays the same. If we take your statement than south east Asian countries are also Indian then since cholas concurred it before.
That doesn't justify anything nor change the fact that people from different parts of the so-called pan-Indian civi-lisation have different origins. It's just like how some arabs advocate for Pan-Arabism that stretches from Spain in Europe to Rakhine in Myanmar. That doesn't change the fact that someone from Myanmar have nothing linguistically, genetically or cul-turally common with someone from Spain
Culturally, linguistically and genetically the East Asian looking phenotype of Northeast India is indeed quite different from most of Assam, Bengal and rest of India. The language family is predominantly Tibeto-burman and sino-tibeto-burman. The sino component is most prevalent in Arunachal Pradesh tribes. Khasi, kachahri May be austroasiatic.
Wdym by sino-tibeto-burman, there's no such as that. They are all same, the only difference is that in sinitic languages they use Chinese scripts whereas in other languages of the family they use different scripts hence the name tibeto-burman. They were once called tibeto-chinese/sino-tibetan, the tibeto-burman concept is new. Linguistically the NE languages are much more similar to Chinese than with burmese or Tibetan.
@@Chisiu12 You are wrong , north east Indian tibeto burmans are closer to tibetan and burmese then Chinese dialects. Even my language i.e mizo(chin-kuki-mizo)closes relative is burman language.
@@littleninjavangchhia9099 I have a thorough study of anthropology and burmese is not even a one single bit similar with sino-tibetan Languages of India nor china, even the tribal languages of burma is so different from burmese and has similarity with Northeastern languages rather than burmese.
@@littleninjavangchhia9099 vangchhia tell me in what way does this word for "you" Which is "sain" Similar to Ning, na and nang of NE Indian languages. In Chinese languages it is na and nin, much more closer with NE Indian languages. Words like beautiful which is meltha in mizo and meltra in kuki, is "lasaw-a-sainn" In burmese does this seem even a one bit Similar to you? The same in Chinese is "Meili-da". Almost all indians have origin from southern china not Tibet or burma. Tibetic languages are Bodpa, sherpa, denzongpa, drukpa, gurung, tamang, limbu, khampa and so on and have little to no similarity with NE Indian languages, NE languages have more words in common with the chinese languages, also stop commenting anyhow without knowing and think logically southern China is just next home, it's so close whereas bammar population is actually much more further than the border the indo-myanmar border is shield by arkanese, naga, chin, rakhaine and other tribal state and beyond that bamar people live in Irrawaddy River. The only people in NE and who's languages are actually of Tibetan origin are the denzongpa who speak drenzoke and monpa.
It's the geography, Enviornment, Windy and cold environment caused smaller eyes and lighter skin But this didn't happen all of a sudden After thousand years of withstanding the climate and environment, our looks changed
As we move eastward plains, northwards mountainous heights, their situational adaptability differs and it evolves in their physical appearance ,which made them a subtle ethnic touch. Thus we all have the same DNA,no difference untill some leftist made 20yrs brainwashing therapy...
@@pathoithingz4320 your missionary fed fake thoughts from far far sandLand, in lieu of rice bag and psychological miracle(magician acts etc) have created an inferiority complex.its not yours problem, but a few crypto xristian fringe groups are conditioned for 2-3 generations ,for a self denial. Don't worry ,your kids will repair you people's thoughts in this internet era.
No sir, iam from arunachal. Still today we have oral recitations of how our ancestors traveled from mongolia south( which is a part of China today) to Himalayas and then to arunachal today. You are really wrong here. We are of mongolian origin( country not the race) . However due to gap of many generations , variations in dialects and practices developed. Meanwhile, till today, some words,names,surnames, some cultural practices are similar to chinese culture (not tibetans). Tibetans were our business partners, they provided us Himalayan salt mostly. In barter exchange , we gave them food, meat, animals, animal skin etc. It is believed that our ancestors were nomads thousands of years ago. From mongolia they reached Eling lake and gyaring lake and then to nyigchi and atlast settled in tsangpo river basin. Even from todays myanmar also ,people migrated thousands of years ago which wasn't demarcated at those times as countries.
Why the ppl look different in NE region,cause they migrated fo sure,and originally not Indians , and I don't know why ppl insult such looking ppl ,but these looking ppl were rocking around the world,eg Genghis Khan and still they r rocking,like Muay Thai legends ,ufc fighters,yayyyyyy!!!
Bro we generally we accepted as part of a great Mongoloid wave of migration from China and later moved out to India to their present habitat. It is possible that we Mizo came from Shinlung or Chhinlungsan located on the banks of the river Yalung in China.as the moment of fact we are apart of the Mongolian race
Sir ,i got a question, that north east ppl ,thier looks different,body features more like east and south east asian countries, culture totally different from mainland India,why would our ancestors be Indian , i think if not mongolia then must be some other east or south east asian countries,but im sure they wre not indian initially. So where did they came from exactly, yes language is tibeto Burmese,but but but but ....but tibeto Burmese also migrated from elsewhere. I m going by body features ok .
Mongoloid race is just a term given to people belonging to certain physical characteristics group or race. It does not have anything to do with belonging from the country Mongolia.
Hidimba was from cachar northeast but after marring bhim nd their child they moved to Himachal, nd ghatotkach took birth in Himachal nd Bheem left her in Himachal....check Vedas nd full Sanskrit Mahabharata....hidimba was a mayabi demon but good one...so just think what a mayabi demon can do with their powers nd chants....
Nice propaganda bruh. I'm a Naga, got my DNA tested via 23& me, turns out I'm 89% Chinese & Mongolian, 7% Central Asian & 4% Inuit. Anyone who does not agree with me can get it done & see by themselves. Peace out.
The problem with the race based argument of a "nation" is that it's built on the assumption that for people to be part of a nation they have to share common genetic ancestry. This has it's roots in early 20th century European nationalism when racial theory was widely used for purely political purposes under the guise of "nationalism". In modern Europe , this topic will be an embarrassment even for a dinner table conversation . Now coming to the question of North East India , almost all of the indigenous population in the North East will have genetic markers that are associated with ethnicities in rest of South East Asia. This includes not just groups belonging to Tibeto-Burman but also Austro-Asiatic language families. A Khasi native of Meghalaya is most likely to find genetic markers common with Khmer people in Cambodia. This is how population genomics work , it's not based on how national boundaries are defined. He is right that there is no scientific basis of race. At the same time , he mentions that there are common genetic markers found in northeastern ethnicity that are common with rest of India. Those markers will also be present in people of Pakistan , Afghanistan and possibly that entire region. Does that make them Indian? The root of the problem is the premise of the question itself. So what if people in the NE are "Mongolian"? ( I think the personal here is simply referring to facial features just as what a layman in the west would call "Asian" or "oriental") .
Abhijit, you have discussed well on section or class of North East people... Tibeto Burman. Mongoloid is a race... Like Black and the Caucasians. And to add further Sikkim has its ethnic grouping in Tibetan not burmese. What is Tibeto Burman after all.... We did not originated from them
The earliest sikkimese r lepcha, limboo tribe n they r more closer to bodo, naga not tibbetan. Also Nepal migrated khambu( rai ), yakkha etc more closer to North East Indian than tibbetan. Bhutia, sherpa, yolmo, tamang, gurung r closer to tibbetan. But they r later migrant from tibbet directly, through nepal. So it's wrong to be called sikkimese r tibbetan when it's earliest tribes more closer to bodo, naga, southern Chinese. In terms of race.
I am from NE and want to add that separatist of NE(Abrahamics/Maoists) refer to India to the west as “Mainland India" as if we are some people who are not supposed to be part of India. The thing is; Akhand Bharat to the east is The Mainland because it is the region where Hinduism is most populous. Mainland Hinduism is NE India(Buddhism is not a religion seperate from Hinduism)
Bruh 😂 we aren't Chinese. The region where hans live is known as mainland China and the other occupied nations by China is known as parts of China.
From North to South and from west to East, there's only one India and the people living in it are indians. 🙌
@@powerhousebikki I was talking about Sanatan Dharma and Akhand Bharat of which Sino-Tibetan people are also a part.
True
Actually, while there are many similarities and overlaps between Hinduism and Buddhism, they are their own religions. Due to the nature of Hinduism and Buddhism, you could be a 'mix' of them, but it would be wrong to say they are one and the same.
@@TheDAKing5 Yes it is different but part of Sanatan Dharma. I use Hinduism as a umbrella term for faiths that is not Abrahamic(as our constitution does)
i am from Sikkim and we are the Bhutia community , since childhood i ve been told that we were originally from bhutan. there is a small hamlet called "HAA" and once the haa community had huge disageements with the kingdom hence were exiled from the kingdom. since sikkim was near by bhutan and the haa community took refuge at sikkim. i dont know how much truth lies in this story.but still its a mystery.
It would be fascinating to know about Sikkim's history and its people ancestry.
Interesting
Hi Kessang! I m here from Uttarakhand, here too live Bhutia/Bhotia peoples. Mostly on Tibetan border areas of our state. There are considered ST here. One of my friend was from Pithoragarh district of Uttarakhand and he once told me before China's conquest of Tibet they used to do commerce with Tibetan people and most probably his ancestors came from Tibet too. Here is an interesting thing about Bhotias of our state - from those who live in Garhwal region of Uttarakhand follow Buddhism but in Kumaon region they follow Hinduism. Offcourse they they have their very unique traditions and attires unlike other hill men of Uttarakhand.
@@rajpaudel246 sikkim has three main communities mainly Lepchas , Bhutias and Nepalese. they live peacefully n maintains a very cordial relationship. it is said and well known truth that Lepchas are the original inhabitants of sikkim. likewise Bhutias and Nepalese they migrated from the bodering countries like Nepal and Tibet. there are three languages spoken by sikkemese ppl Nepali which is spoken by Nepali ppl, Lepcha which is spoke by Lepchas and "lhokay" / "bhotay" spoken by Bhutia ppl. but the common language spoken by the sikkemese ppl is Nepali. speaking only nepali language does nt mean you are Nepali. likewise speaking only french does not mean tou are french citizen.
one thing i wanted to know by leaving my comment is to know the history of bhutia ppl cause i belong to bhutia community, and among bhutia also i belobg to lachungpa tribe which is same like bhutia community but the language has lik differences. it has been said that bhutias had migrated from tibet but the small tribe called "Lachungpas" could have been migrated from Bhtanese small hamlet called "HAA" cause i hve personally visited the HAA and i found no diferences in the living style, the language, the culture, the physical stature eveyrthing is very similar.
also mr@raj paudel this is to your kind information sikkim is the intergral part of the grt nation called India/Bharat. yes before merging with this grt nation sikkim was a independent country/kingdom.it was only on 16th May, 1975 that Sikkim officially merged with the Indian union and became the 22nd state of the country.
I'd asked about Nagaland and coincidence that even he asked similar to mine. And I get my answer. Awesome
im a Malayalee person whose Ethnicity is East Asian so yeah Im a Hindu and get discriminated
Malayalee with east asian ethnicity😮,that's strange to me. Can u tell me more about it.@@ChandranPrema123
NE Indians are Mongoloids not Mongolian. Mongoloid is a race whereas Mongolian is a nationality, the people of Mongolia are called Mongolian.
They are ethnically mongols
@@dreamer_deer babur, tamerlane and the mughal empire...they all claimed ancestry from the mongols and especially chingis khaan....mughal means f**king mongol in persian....ethnic mongols
If northeast people marriage north indian then a better racial child born. Their eye size increase, Fair skin color, Cheeks and jaws are perfect and tall height, good stamina.
@@Jones1236-p too bad there are people from uttrakhand/Himachal who already got that! so you are kinda late bud
I am from NE and belong to upper assam and when I was in my primary school we learned about caste system but it was hard for me to imagine it cause the book says that all the Hindus were once part of the caste system. Where here even my tribe, who follow Hinduism were not part of the caste system. I think the books should mention about which empire or dynasty the system was applied. My tribes ancestor were the high priests according our floks and even in google. And we are native to the region of upper assam and lower arunachal.
we have to unlearn the lies/ fake info that the education system teaches us and explore and find out the truth ourselves. That's the only way we'll ever keep being united as one nation.
I personally believe that caste system is nothing but a joke that's forcefully imposed upon us, don't you think so too?
We ARE one, but divided by this stupid system... that makes people more self-conscious and causes infighting
We are hindus for not long. That's why we weren't part of the caste system.
This video is only propagating akhand bharat theory which didn't exist before 1826(in case of NE India).
I'm also a Kalita, we are mentioned in Wikipedia as caste hindus but till date I don't know what our caste is.
For this you have to understand hinduism from the perspective of the assamese vaishnavite society there is no cast system in vaishnavism except for the people who still follow brahmin influenced rituals caste system do exist
@@fungusamongus.76 Would you say Kalitas have a caste ? And if they don't, how come they fall in the category of upper caste ? Because Kalitas are vaishnavites and follow Ekxoron Naam Dhormo
Tai people were originally from different parts of Thailand, Yunan, and Myanmar... There are 6 Tai communities in India, Tai Ahom, Tai Khamti, Tai Phake, Tai Aiton, Tai Khamyang and Tai Turung.
Tai bhaka jana ney?
Tai people are also found in Vietnam, Laos , Cambodia , Phillipines.
Tai lai
Regarding tai ahoms, the present day ahom people are nothing but Aryans carrying ahom surnames and titles, only the Royal Family and a tiny percentage of ahom population can claim themselves to be actual ahoms carry ahom bloodlines.
@@Chisiu12 Yes, most of them are just "wannabe" ahoms 😂
My father researched about our community a long time age and he found that our ancestors are from Mongolia.
He had published a book long time ago and it already got out of stock.
He handed the Copyright to the Central Government and it's listed in the official government site too.
Could you please share a link to the book? What's the title?
Name of the book?
We are Indian first 🇮🇳🔥👑
U cant see hinduism and BHARAT as different entities.
@@z.heisenberg no
For me as an Indian all r equal as INDIAN
@@holly1190 yes for u. Not for me.
We are humans first
Most of us Zo people (Chin-Kuki-Mizo people) have done 23andme My Heritage DNA test and most of the results show that we're 70-75% Chinese and Vietnamese,5-10% Nepali and the rest being Mongol, Inuit, Finnish, Italian and Central Asians. Among these Nepali I've mentioned, most of them were Tibeto-Burman language speakers and were not Indo-Aryan language speakers.
Our ancestors were followers of Sakhua. Sakhua can only be followed by a pure Zo descent. No other ethnic groups can practice it. That's why, interracial marriage was very less in the olden days.
Which Chinese? Han or any other?
@@biswaranjanmallick7407 southern Chinese, basically from yunan and Vietnam. Austro-asiatic people, the Y-DNA haplogroup of mizos such as lushai is 85% O2a which is austro-asiatic, found in yunan, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and tribes of Phillipines.
How do you mail back the samples for the test and who carries the cost to do so?
If I may ask what was your Maternal Haplogroup? cuz I also took the test and found out that my maternal haplogroup originated from the tibetian and burman region, I am from the south part of India, and found it very interesting that my mother's side originate from somewhere in that region.
Let alone who live in modern India, if you even live in Europe and the Americas, chances are you're actually Indian. All the migration happened from here, Originating from Africa, after centuries of settling down in India, different clans migrated towards the other parts of the world.
We(historians) may be wrong about that life originated in Africa & all our ancestors travelled from Africa to all over India. Proper Survey & Study has not been carried out in Indian subcontinent. May be someday, new data can be obtained.
उन्हें(यूरोपीय और अमेरिकी) हम भारतीय नहीं मानते।
@@muktaaich4937 हाट
Mene ese suna h ki shastro ke anusar Tibet me hue thi life start
All the migration originating from Africa? Bullshits ! Now Hindus Indians don’t take any bullshit from others ☝️. Period
While studying in Delhi I was asked many times if I was from China, Japan etc and I would say yes, I'm not from India. It's embarrassing to be called an Indian if they don't accept me as one.
I feel sorry for u........but u should consider urself as indian...... foreign forces are trying to separate NE , J&K ,etc ......by doing so u r making it easy for them......and those who live in central India are also unknowingly supporting those separatist ideology......
I am sorry . Some assholes dont know how to give respect. Their parents didn't give them good sanskars
@jojores180 people like you are the reason i am starting to give up faith on democracy, sharing equal representation with dumb****s like you is unbearable.
how is the comment above you victim blaming? do you even know what that is?
@@knockout1975 You should proud to be an Indian. No matter how many times they ask your nationality. Always remember you are an Indian as much as I am.
@@knockout1975 don't wanna mwahhh👨❤️💋👨
Note that many of today's north eastern states were not part of the so-called pan-indian civilisation until the British incorporated them into British india. Assam have long lost its identity and is today full of Bangladeshis and Indian caucasoids from other parts of the country. A better example is Arunachal pradesh and Tripura (until very recently).
Unfortunately Tripura is also being overrun by Bangladeshi refugees.
I agree with you
Assamese is not all east asian looking tribals. Assamese is an indo-aryan language and the culture is majorly indo-aryan. Assam is a melting pot of cultures. It is not a hill state, majority of it is plains. I myself belong to a mongoloid ethnicity.
I don't know about people but the land of NE is part of Vedic civilization for sure. There is a place called Parshuram Kund which is where Lord Parshuram took bath to remove his curse. There is an ancient Shiva Linga also in Arunachal. And it is part of our Vedic history. Another example is Chitrangada which is said to be from manipur , we certainly don't have proof of that but the Parshuram kund and Shiva Linga is direct archaeological proof. So maybe the people migrated here later.
@@shayanraj7840 There were surely interactions between people of the northeast and mainland India just like there were interactions with itinerant tribals who passed through the lands inhabited by Vedic people (many of whom adopted Vedic culture and lost their original language) but that doesn't substantiate the claim that Indians are all the same people and all the lands which are today part of India were also a part of Vedic civilisation? Many people would beg to differ with the notion that Indians are all the same people and we OUGHT to unite under one religion, one language and one civilisation.
@@shayanraj7840 depends on what you mean by "outsiders". If by outsiders you mean by current geographical boundaries then yes, Greeks are outsiders because we don't have even a sizable population of people of Greek descent today in India so by modern standards they are outsiders. When the population of today's outsiders becomes sizable enough to influence and finally take over the region demographically, they are no longer considered outsiders by the future generations of people who lived there before the latter came. Nobody is native anywhere because humans keep moving across different lands.
Whats happens when Abhijit and Anad Ranganathan share a same dias🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
JNU Burns 😁
Excellent idea bro ,I too excited to see both of them together on mainstream media
Burnol sell in JNU will drastically increase
@@umbrellacorporation5723 not just burnol but cocaine too.
Genetically NE people do not share mainland india DNA. Some similarities are there because of intermixing between different races.
But telling that we come from the same root is just absurd.
Khasia people of meghalaya are related to the cambodians, naga and munda people have come from the Philippines(many milennium ago) , bodo people from Tibetan region, tai people from yunnan and burma. How can they share same gene with the mainland indians apart from the intermixed ones?
Exactly
True, many dna ancestry test results of northeast people are on TH-cam , they show mostly Chinese -vietnamese, Thai/khmer , Mongolian and very few South Asian ancestry
We are Koch originally from chaina Tibet and Siberia
I think bodo people migrated from tibet because they live near Tibet, bhutan
The Indian gene is also found in SE Asia 😂. I carry Indian genes and I am Filipino. Its because of mixing genes and intermarriage betweem Aryans and Mongoloids. We did evolve from the same race. The Indian gene is found throughout Malaysia, Philippines and Indonesia from Indian immigration to the area.
When u come in Uttrakhand, Nepal and Himachal Pradesh so there are all ethnicity groups like Dravid, Indo-Iranian, Aryan and Tibeto-Burmese. Now, we are all engaged to each others.
In Nepal u will see aryan tibet burma some kind of dravid
There's no tibeto Burmese those r tibetans
Love uk
Same here in Assam.
The lower caste people have Dravidian features (90 percentage) because of kols ancestory
Whereas upper caste ( Brahmins khastriyas) belongs to Caucasian ( khas Aryans) or indo aryans or mongoloids in uttarakhand( 90 percentage)
Tripura is also a sino tibetan state. But now it's a Bengali dominant state
Same as north bengal
@@bibeksinha9914most Bengalis are mixed with Mongolian people.
Not sino ,tibeto burman
Basically northeast India is mixing hotspot of south Asian, East Asian and Polynesian ethnicities
I am from Assam, A Kalita by Caste and my ancestors were from Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh, who later migrated to Assam, so not all NE are Mongoloid as most people believe to be.. I have never seen any instance of Racism during my 5 years in Delhi instead they get shocked to see a tall guy with beard to be from Assam as they have this mindset that all NE people look chinese
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 we are all Indian! Looks dont matter! 🇮🇳🇮🇳
I'm from northeast India. We are racially Mongoloids. Culturally Sino-tibetan. And nationality is Indian. End of debate
Seems contradictory to what Abhijit ji said. Do you not agree with his analysis?
@@tjzuffa534 no. Abhijeet sir has no basis. We still have oral recitations of how we migrated from mongolia to central China to Himalayas and arunachal. He must have checked the dna of some mixed race people of assam ,indo aryan mongoloid race mixed. We are still pure mongoloid race with no dilution in genes. Especially, arunachal, nagaland, mizoram, some sections of tripura, assam, meghalaya and manipur tribals etc
@@shrimpcadre1312 the origin of small eyed race originated in Mongolia no offence tho, and they went out to and lived in whole east Asia!
@@AdishDebbarma
Why you deny your own race
Is it because you wanted to accepted by others so bad
If you are ashamed of reality then you are literally nothing
@@AdishDebbarma ah yes calling it "colonial" does the rest of the work for you...
Linguistics is considered a science because we can objectively substantiate its claims not because some Wh-ite blonde man from the British empire thought languages have a common origin.
Tibeto Burmese / Sino -Tibetan people itself is a part of the large Mongoloid race. Refresh your history 😆
Race and ethnicity aren't the same thing though 💀
Mongoloid is an obsolete racial classification.
You don't even know the difference between race and ethnicity. Still tu unhe galat bol raha hai 😂
I am indonesia greetings to north east india , proud to be mongoloid
But Abhijit sir is saying that there is no such races exist ,there is only one race , what r ur thoughts on that , I'm from northeast India
@@himrajkashyapdolpa-bq5um There are many races in the world ,, and my race is Malayan Mongoloid , I am malay etnic indonesia ,Bangka Belitung island
@@himrajkashyapdolpa-bq5um And this is my DNA th-cam.com/users/shortsFrC4Wic-g-k?
@@melayukamparocu5528 oh u mean u believe in races ,me too
@@himrajkashyapdolpa-bq5um of course i believe, race is real
No we are not related to Aryans or Dravidians never. But ofcourse our nationality is Indian
I used to identify myself Indo-mongloid & i always had doubt using the term but from today I'll identify myself as indo-tibetian or indo-tibetian-barman
i think you should identify your self as an indian nothing else you have the same origin of linguistics as tebietian barman because it also used to be india and that linguistica originated from ne india where you are and then spread to tibet...so you are pure indian your language should change how you identify your self
Indian
@@meh2007 Tibeto-burmese languages came from india and spread to Tibet😂? Now this is some next level of indo-cen-trism. Not even 18th and 19th century european historians were that Euro-cen-tric about their claims. The origin of the Tibeto-Burman speakers was located in the upper course of Yangtse and the Haong Ho (Yellow) rivers in North West China and it should not bother you at all because many of today's north-eastern states were only incorporated into india by the British in the 19th century.
Manipur was forced to join India at gunpoint in Shillong. Manipuris have similar DNA culture to the South East Asians.
Keep dreaming
Every state in india joined the union on gun point. First by the British then by INC leaders. You are not telling anything new. But remember one thing without the union we would have no identity and importance on the world stage.
Yes Meitei and Ahom has their own kingdom. We Burmese imvade it and lost to British. And then you become parts of India. I feel sad for our bad.
@@terraminsan7392 I feel sad why Burma(Brahmadesh Sanskrit: ब्रह्मदेश) was seperated from India😒
@@terraminsan7392 Also there is mention of The Kingdom "Pragjyotishpur(Sanskrit: प्रागज्योतिषपुर)" Which comprised North-eastern states of India and some part of Tibet
Son of Pandu Arjun married the princess of Pragjyotishpur known as "Chitrangada Sanskrit: चित्रांगदा)"
We northeast,India...are not pure India...our food,culture,dress,look...different from mainland Indian...we northeast ...come from Yunnan province China,Thailand,mynmmar,phillipinese,Vietnam,loas,Cambodia,Japan,...we are sino_Tibetan spoken language
So stop saying us DAT we are pure India...nooooooooooooo...we are not .
Ikr, they draw a border saying u guys are "Indian". In reality, your people look more East and S.E. Asian.
@@hewas_chewasky our forefather come from Yunnan province ....so who r living in Yunnan province actually they r not Chinese peoples...they r Thai n Tibetan...100%...
@@hewas_chewasky we are not mix with Indian ok...we are mix Thai n burmese....u search for Nagaland.
..ok...our elder say DAT we are come from thailand to yunnan province to northeast,india
@@hewas_chewasky Northeast India ppl look more like SE Asians. But also like some Japanese.
Okinawans and Hokkaido ppl have some Jomon/Ainu ancestry.
@@hewas_chewasky u are ryt...but not all east India...only Assam,Tripura they ppl look like Bangladesh or west Bengal...but Nagaland,arunachal Pradesh,Manipur,Mizoram look pure Asian Feature...I'm from Nagaland we are look like Thai.
Arjun's wife chitrangada was from manipur, bheem's wife hidimba was from cachar, assam. NE has been contributing to the rich past since the ancient time.
Hidimba was from Himachal
@@ashukr2038 Tradition states that Hidimba belonged to the great Bamun family of Nalbari(Assam)kamrup of which the Dimasa tribal people are descendants of.
@@ajatashatru4198 Yeah Dimasa people do say that.
@@ajatashatru4198 ,
Brahmin is indo-Aryan concept
And Dimasa are Tibeto-burman not indo aryan.
So Dimasa can't be descendents of Brahmin (indo-aryan) fake sanstritaitsrion of North East India tribe.
@@jibokomiuli we just now classified that the indo aryan concept of brahminisation isnt a concept at all
and there are assamese brahmins called bamuns in axomiya
The only thing I hate in life is being called an Indian 😭
And i would kill myself if I was a mongoloid
#AskAbhijit Sir right now this is the period when Ambubachi mela in Assam's Kamakhya Temple happens. But due to pandemic this year it has been cancelled. Sir, what is the history of Kamakhya Temple and What is this festival's significance? During this period for 4 days we shouldn't cut tress, cut leaves, dig holes on ground... Why? Please answer if you know❤
Hi, iam from odisha and there is the same ritual followed in here but called as Rajo, before the Rath yatra of Lord Jagganath. You can google it.
The history of Kamakhya is way before than the Ahom invasion of Kamrupa kingdom. It was built by Asur king of Asura kingdom name Narkasur.
Kamakhya peeth was originally a tribal shrine, not hindu.
During the medieval period, garo priests used to do the ceremonies there, not the hindu priests. After adoption of hindu religion by the local rulers, this temple was converted into a hindu one.
You may also know that Shiva wasn't a hindu deity either. He was a kirati deity.
Kamakhya temple was reconstructed during Koch king Narayan 1565, current structure rebuilt by Ahom king Rudra Singha (reign 1696 to 1714) and Siba Singha (1714 to 1744) with remnants of earlier Koch temple carefully preserved
@@nuclearnadal7993 Well I don't know about Kamakhya but yea I can confirm Garo tribe was associated with spirituality and priest things .
I beg to differ... I think the Northeast Region needs to be studied differently as it is a very complex region... Every state is complex... This region is like a junction of all races arround.. The Khasis are Austro Asiatic and are the oldest inhabitants of India... Assamese are a part of Vanga People which split into Bengalis Odiyas and Assamese... Others are mostly Tibeto Burman.... Sir I would request you to Study...
We need to study off course ,study will unite for wise
@@KukiCrusader Actually we people of North East should speak about our diverse cultures.. As you said correctly it's a melting point of Culture
@@rvd597 A melting pot is very optimistically put. It brings along a lot of uneasiness and contempt among communities as well. Also you are talking about language groups. These are not races my friend. Linguistic groups do not represent an ethnicity. Its good that NE promotes it’s tourism and culture via this so called ‘tribal heritage’, ‘headhunters’ etc. But it is not indicative of the whole region. There are various pastoral communities, who don’t share that history. For example Assamese, they are mostly farmers, others are jhum cultivators for generations, for example Bengalis. Are you gonna say Bengali as a ‘tribe’? For me there are only 5 states in the NE with a very different cultural root than that of mainland India. Assam and Tripuri culture is very similar to mainland Indian culture. Manipur is heavily influenced by Hinduism, but yet they maintain that princely state heritage and history. I might be wrong, here but from what I know it’s like that in the NE.
@@KukiCrusader Manipur was never a part of Assam,my guy
@@KukiCrusader all states in NE are not just carved out of assam, they were carved out because they were never part of assam. Brush up your history, assam(axom) is only the brahmaputra valley. The other areas were all tribal and hilly areas, the map of ahom kingdom is Assam. After subjugating ahom(assam), the Britishers charged towards jaintia hills, khasi hill, garo hills, NC hills & manipur, mikir hills etc. And lastly tripura, these tribal areas along with assam(ahom) was deemed as one British administrative zone and they named it after ahom(assam). The tribals areas were put under "partially excluded areas" where indians without British permission wouldn't be able to enter. Even today in assam, there are still two tribal areas called as dima hasao(NC hills) and mikir hills(karbi anglong) where the Assamese and outsiders cannot settle or buy land, the Assamese language isn't used here. And the people are governed by autonomous rule and not by assam government.
In the past numerous times assam has tried to impose it's dominance or control over tribal areas , similar to what's happening in mizoram and manipur. The mizo government is trying to gain control over lai, mara and chakma autonomous areas and manipur over the tribal areas of it's place. This led to states being carved out again and again. Even right now, the karbis and dima hasao people aren't happy with Assamese policies to establish control on the region
I'm from Bodo tribe which worships God Shiva and this Northeast Indian region which was known as Kamrup before was ruled by the Bodo kachari king Narkasur who has a very interesting stories about how strong and fearsome he was that he can lift and spread the giant trees to two pieces just by using his hands 😅 after his reign some royal family desputes happen and ahoms invaded us so now it's ...
@LAZY Assam our major population lives in the north bank of the Brahmaputra river below the foothills of Bhutan and Arunachal Pradesh which region is Called BTR consist of five districts, future proposed state we have our own Autonomous electoral system. 🙂
@LAZY yeah i guess we were neglected back then but now it's kind of reviving again slowly and more tourist are coming these days so slowly it will become a major tourist spot in future coz most of the northeastern lands are still untouched and filled with natural beauty and mountains etc. With cool weather.😁
@@zerotwowaifu2232 You are Kiratas of Mahabharat maybe. Narakasur was not Kachari.
@@Indic462 our history is very fragmented so we need more archeological discoveries
@@zerotwowaifu2232 You don't have your written history though. Everything about your hiatory is only from the Ahom buranji.
Iam from nagaland,ya,much is not known about the geneology of our ancestors,however,the traditions goes by,we are purely migrated from Mongolia to China and again migrated to Burma,and thereby Manipur and scattered northeast abroad.
Nagas don't even have a single Y-DNA haplogroup markers of mongols or altaic people. Not even a single lineage from Mongolia
If im as much as Indian as you, then why do i get asked literally by every person who saw me in Delhi whether im a foreign student from China or Japan.
Bro it's india 16% of world population is here so very much possible many mentally cracked roaming in various parts of our country and so please ignore them they might not even know the spelling of our country
As he said the education system that had been continuing for such a long time( we see some changes in education policies NOW hoping to see something in favour of this issue) didnt educate the people about the north east india .. so people have no idea about the people and the culture..even when people from punjab go to other states like gujrat punjab and others go to any foreign land alot of times they guess the ethinicity to be saudi arabian , pakistani, etc. i mean ik even we feel bad at that time… you guys being called so in your own country might feel way worse.. and i am really against it.. but its also not easy for indians to guess who is from where.. alot of times people from punjab are called rajanthani just if they feel appearance is not what the stereotype is..
Me coming from a kashmiri hindu background have heard alot of poeple commenting on my friends due to their very fair skin that they dont look indian..so i believe there is no harm in telling them from where you are ..as its not easy to guess .. and im compeletly against the racism if someone from NE experiences it.. though i have seen quite a change.. i think the bullying has reduced.. correct me if im wrong
KP oli : saab ke saab nepali haa 😂
😂😂😂
Yo I am a koch
Me north east assam se hu lekin mera facial structure indo aryan hai.
@@debashrisaikiaxaikia3699 because you are aryan. Assamese language is indo-aryan so many people are also aryan.
@@Iohh26you are Aryan or not
#AskAbhijit Sir Why Contribution and sacrifices of some great Rajput kings like Rana Sanga and Bappa Rawal so underrated and what's reality behind it
To uphold the puny greatness of Mughals,the greatness of all indian kings is belittled
@@ameynamjoshi741 True...😕😕😔
Those Tibetan are also Mongoloid by look , we are also Mongoloid.
We r also Mongoloid
I'm a Khasi and our language is among the few austro-asiatic speaking (mon khmer) in the South East Asia..
I'm from the North East too
But from Assam 😂
We are Mongolian bro we just migrated and settled near tibet china and Myanmar
Genetically some Assamese may be similar to the mainland Indian due to migration but I don't think we can generalise and conclude that NE people have similar genes.
Thanks for making videos on my paternal grandparents, BorPhukan and my maternal grandparents, Buragohain.
Can you give a link to the study which makes you claim that they(North East Indians) have the same genes as other Indians from different parts? I want to have a look at where the sample is taken because that can make a huge difference, for example, Assam, where they intermingle more with, for a lack of a better word, Central India longer which includes the Bengalis, it might make sense that there will be same genetic markers present there more compared to other states that live more in isolation.
He can't prove it cuz it's not true. I, a meetei of Kangleipak and other kangleichas have east asian and southeast asian genes and this is thoroughly researched and proven in lots of studies.
Note R1a1a is patrilineal. Most likely Aryan invaders from Vedic times who intermarried with local NE women.
Your definitions are very articulate. Thanks for clearing it to people. We are all Indian no matter what race we are.
There is one doubt here. During the 15-16th CE, a large amount of mainland Indian influx started if wrong please correct me. But the idea is that it would be a very much possibility that Indian genes and NE indigenous peoples genes got mixed up and spreaded.
I am from Manipur and we have a section of surnames that belongs to the class of Brahmins which we call Bhamon. And traditionally, we have 7 groups which is normally understood as clans called Yek-Salai. Now, if we do tracing of these, many of hill tribes of Manipur come under this along the major tribe the Meiteis. I believe in other states also this kind of structure is found which has not originated from Hinduism.
I am from India.
I am North Indian of Marathi descent. Both of my parents are from Maharashtra.
Accurately speaking, from Eastern part of Maharashtra.
But father said he is from Border part of Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh.
+ I checked on Internet that I have Turkic ancestry too. How this can be possible?
your great great great grandma was very naughty
You cant have turkic ancestry lolz
Mixing
OMG why 44 dislikes 😐 We all are one 🙏🏻
Some people don't like/can't digest the fact
What facts?
I always had a big question regarding mongoloid races in Arunachal Pradesh. Thank you for debunking it.
He doesn't know anything
He’s so wrong about Arunachal lol
he's wrong!
He's wrong bro😂😂
#AskAbhijit When was the caste system introduced in India and how did it change over time?
I don't know when it started. But I'll try to answer how it happened. Firstly, it didn't happen only because of the British - yes, they made it worse. Let me give you an analogy. Suppose there's a poor guy who's from upper caste and there's a rich guy who's also from upper caste. The rich guy won't treat the poor guy same way as he would do to other rich people. Why? Because of socio-economic differences. And this creates a hierarchy in which rich are treated fairly and poor badly (doesn't matter if they're an upper caste Hindu or lower). So, in the same way, people back then who got rich suppressed the poor for generations, so that the poor people remain poor and lower rank in social-economic hierarchy. Therefore, the people who remained poor for generations got a label, dalit or achhut, by rich.
@@powerhousebikki Thank you for the explanation.
@@sene7767 Did you find me saying that it didn't exist before that? I didn't give any evidence based answer, I just came up with my one, so it doesn't have to be correct. I just tried to explain how it might have been created.
And cite your sources.
@@powerhousebikki You also didnt site your sources and you forgot people who often moved between states changed there Varana and the British restricted movement between states and made a registry rigidifing the fluidity of caste identities AND ORIGINALY JATTI HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH VARNA ITS A 5 CENTRY CORRUPTION.
@@VSM101 Read my comment again. You have comprehending problem.
Tibeto-Burman is also from where the Sinitic branch or the so called Chinese languages also arise.
But the origin lies in North-East since the highest genetic & linguistic(language) diversity of the Sino-Tibetean branch is here and it is from here that the migrations to China happened.
Most Chinese don't have a pale or yellow skin, especially the Southern Hans who are darker and have looks closer to the Aboriginals. Han Chinese is an ethnicity which has absorbed various earlier cultures and should not be seen as a homogeneous single origin ethinicity or culture.
The Southern Hans are more Austro-Asiatic and Astronesians in looks and genetics (rather than Turkic or Mongolic which is dominant in Northern Hans and understandably so, because of the migrations of these pastoral Hunas, proto-turks and proto-mongols from the deep tundra forests of northern Siberia), much like the people of South East Asia and have been absorbed by an evolving Han Chinese tribal identity with each heaven mandated conquest.
FYI, Much of Central Asia today is Indian & Iranian maternally in gentics as the Hunas, Turks & later Mongols overran the region in various waves, killing men and taking their women as their wives or concubines and thus creating new ethnicities!
Also P.S. The whole Mongoloid feature stems from the Denisovan mixing with already mixed Homo Spaiens & Neanderthals, based on current theories of migration(should not be considered as ethched into stone since these theories sometimes change over time due to new evidences from various allied fields of study).
Central Asia are mongoloid race ( Turkic people).
There are Iranian ethnics but no Indian.
The mongoloid features are already present in Africa where our mongoloid ancestor originated. Look at the khoi san for example they got mongoloid features too.
You are right and wrong at the same time.
@@littleninjavangchhia9099 but khoi San has no affinity to East Asian people. The Europeans especially the blondes have higher genetic affinity to East asians. The development of mongoloid features or monolid isn't limited to East asians
We will never be India in our Hearts 💕
Are you Meitei?🤔
Sir, In the past NE India was home to many tribes for a long time where many kingdoms flourished and got wiped but after british rule ended we became a part of India just like every other region of India. Here, most of the tribes are having mongoloid facial features and they have mixed genes. Sir, I would like to say that the tribes of North eastern regions are feeling insecure in their own lands many illegal Bangladeshis are taking our own lands we tribal people are becoming minority in our own land just as in the case of Tripura, we tribal peoples feel that government of India donot respect us they are wanting us to come under Bangladeshi rule and other states people are becoming more in terms of population in our own state of Assam. The demography of the state is changing and will harm the tribal people on ground level as many of the tribal people are uneducated in worldly knowledge. The tribal communities of Assam feel disrespected by other communities in their own lands we feel like puppets used by governments for their own benefits not really understanding the peoples demands. We feel we are under dictatorial rule in our own land. I personally think anyone can come and go in any state of India but by destroying the native peoples culture, heritages is not acceptable and moreover the Demographic changes is too fast for many tribal people on ground level. We tribal people want more states in NE Indian region protected under Constitution of India and people of India so that we can prosper at faster rates with our own tribal leaders who understand our tribal people.
I agree with you. You need more attention and more protection. After all you are our brothers and sisters.
Love from Andhra Pradesh.
I'm from Darjeeling
Jai shree Ram 🙏🙏🚩🚩
Mongolian ethnicity, refer to people who have facial and colour similarities of the Mongolian, the word Mongolian ethnicity does not refer to the mongols, the word has been used mainly, because of the easy analytic reference to a type of ethnicity. The swath of geography from North East Pakistan all the way to to East of polynesia, Canada and the whole of Americas , down to the tha south east asia were of the mongol ethnicity. India has aryan, dravidian and mogolian ethnicity. Indian continent had many kingdoms, it was not a monogeneous nation until the independence in 1947. North East Indians are mongol ethnicity, the North West and Central India are of Aryans ethnicity. While North of Pakistan has a mix of caucasian and mongol ethnicity. None of the ethnic races are any superior to the other. For any one to believe that they are a superior ethnicity have a inferiority complex.
dna nahi milta na hi bhasha fir kiyu jabjasti mongol banane me lage huyeho tum
@Quiet Professional divisions of ethnicity started with the migration from Africa to the India basin to the rest of the world.
@Quiet Professional life is so easy, knowledge is at the tip of ones finger. Google what you need to know. More interesting is that one gets educated, with each debate. My post bear no malice, or comparison to any onces ethnicity, we are all equal in this wonderful world.
@@ceychungyu7462 the theory is debunked just needs more limelight
That is mongoloids not mongolian lol
Im not sure abt N.E. states but we Arnchlee espclly northrn region r genetclly mogoloids descends not Aryan but as a nationality we true Indians. Dnt spread this misconceptions...sir what u said is rong espclly for da people of Arnchl prdsh.I agree nowdays due intrction like inter-state marriages ,certainly thre might little connction wid mainland indians.
#AskAbhijit sir, why did Mughals after looting india stayed hear and didn't go back to where they came from just like the British??
Mughals came to loot and spread their religion and belief unlike British. Ofcourse, there were missionaries from England but that wasn't their main objective.
Because they don't want to be slaves of Arabs again so they pay jajiya to arabs and forced hindus to pay jaiya to practice thier language, same done with Irani parsian people later so called afgani .
@Amimul Islam 🙄 What do you mean by evidence? Haven't you read any history books? They stayed in India until the collapse of their empire.
@Amimul Islam I see now. You are an illegitimate child of Mughals, so no point in arguing with you.
Yunnan province is not Chinese people...they are Thai or Tibetan....
People mostly who are in a misconception should know that india as one nation didnt existed before mughal and british invasion, prehistorically there were no official borders unlike today, after gaining indpendence different ethnic tribal land of north east were also included as a part of india, language and ethnicity was always there...the term tibeto burman or mongolian were originated by british...it doesnt mean you have come all the way from mongolia or burma...calm down
They are Mongoloids over all some with Caucasoid And Australoid admixtures in them whether they like to admit to it or not. Not too much Negroid though because The Siddhis are mostly in Western India yeah.
Noo bro we dont have aryan blood nor negroid. We are pure Chinese generically
My DNA shows 42% Tibeto Burmese , 40% southern Chinese (Yizu Tribe), 15 % Malay & 2% others. Most of the north East Indians belong to Austronesian & Austroasiatic race. We are not Aryan admixture (except tai Ahom of Assam & meiteis of Manipur having admixture of genes post conversion to Hinduism) as depicted in your video. My ancestors migrated from Yunnan province somewhere 1000BC - 200 BC
People need to learn the difference between "Mongoloid" (referring to the race, wherein the concept of "race" is itself flawed) and "Mongolian" (ie. of Mongolian nationality).
As a fellow northeasterner, if we must refer to ourselves as anything other than our nationality, we must refer ourselves in terms of ethnicity rather than race bc race is nothing but a prejudiced and flawed system and as far as i know based primarily on physical characteristics of a population as opposed to ethnicity and genetics.
I've come across a lot of fellow northeasterners like myself who often say that they're "mongolians" when they actually mean they're ethnically sino-tibetan or tibeto-burman for example.
Thanks for this awareness I also thought in this way but have doubt that this group lived here before mungol invasion I LOVE MY INDIA
95% Right ,But My tribe ( Monpa) is Belonging to Mongolian Descendant .
My origin is half koch(mongoloid race) and half punjabi ❤....proud to be indian 🇮🇳
How are u related to mongols?
@@raghavgupta7679because we belong to mongloied race our ancestors came from Tibet
@@raghavgupta7679they aren't.
As a Northeastern who caries the thai bloodline i don't agree
NE peoples belong to many races especially Mongoloid peoples and we all have different ethnicity but because we live in Indian and are born in India we should consider ourselves as Indian :) our cultures may not be like other Indian peoples like Dravidians or Indo-Aryans still we should consider ourselves as Indian
Culture is quite similar if we look half full if water and it's different as much as states of India differes ,Karnataka is not similar of Kerala ,and Kerala is not similar of tamilnadu ,even the fingers of our hand are not same .Keeping philosophy apart ,we the Indians form west ,south and north love our north east brothers as much as we love among ourselves .You are always beats in our heart ,what ever the study says .
@@paraggujarathi7399 Yes we are Indians because we were born and raised in India.
@@paraggujarathi7399 I just meant NE Indian culture is not that similar to Dravidian and Indo-Aryan culture
I am from arunachal pradesh, my language is similar with mongolian tribe
They all came from ancient Chinese civilizations.
No..my friend as much as we are Indian but we are not in our blood...as alot of North East India have done a DNA test not one of their DNA are related to Indian but 70%are connected to China /Vietnam and some others but not Indian...thnks
Exactly. We are only Indian by nationality. Ethnicity wise we are entirely separate from "mainland" Indians
@@nem444 agreed
Agreed,the looks says we r ,if not Mongolia then from any of the east asian countries.
@@himrajkashyapdolpa-bq5um who is denying that? We literally live next to china(tibet), myanmar etc. He only cleared the confusion about mongolia.
@@Iohh26 yes I know friend😃
Most Tibetans are mongoloid origin. If Northeast people are considered Tibeto-Burman; in that case we can say they are mongoloid origin. It does make sense here. Facts should be responsibly delivered not manipulated because of Geo-politics scenario. North-east is a part of India now and we cannot claim ourselves of our origin. There's chances we may land up in Africa if we do so very seriously.
Brother India is vast if you compare north Indian with south Indian they very different looks same it goes with north east peoples but looks doesn't matter
Brother I know why you are thinking "he is saying this because of geopolitics" because government doesn't look at northeast that much
But
Just think British had left us with non
We didn't have advanced technologies, and money to develop it
Because it is extremely forest area
But after modi government things are changing look how he developed north east in last 8 years
Just see future their will be vast development
Why most of Tibetans came to India?why they don't go to Mongolia, Myanmar,Thailand,Vietnam?After china occupied tibet because we are people with same culture also they feel more closely to us
Looks doesn't matter
Personally I think northeast is heaven of india just like jammu and Kashmir
I'm from Nagaland we came from Manchuria China ...Tibet is also a Mongoliod race Tibet Mongolia Chinese are same family
Mongol people looks completely different. They have long face and large nose bridge and northeast Indians have small round face with small nose.
Northeast india is also very diverse as india as well ...
🙂 My tribe mostly speak austroasiatic language ..... Not all NE speak Tibetan - Burman
So wht 😀. don't take it seriously 😂
Are you khasi by any chance?
@@teteyani8537 yes
I am from NE, manipur I didn't knew what mongolian marks were tbh, I just realised everyone here in my town including myself have it.
India's prehistoric boundaries (before 4000 yrs) stretch from present day Iran in west to present Myanmar in east, and from today's China occupied Tibet in north to Shri Lanka in south.
That doesn't justify anything borders change every decade but the true natives and tribes who had been living there since thousands of years doesn't change there customs and ethnicity and so the origin stays the same. If we take your statement than south east Asian countries are also Indian then since cholas concurred it before.
That doesn't justify anything nor change the fact that people from different parts of the so-called pan-Indian civi-lisation have different origins.
It's just like how some arabs advocate for Pan-Arabism that stretches from Spain in Europe to Rakhine in Myanmar. That doesn't change the fact that someone from Myanmar have nothing linguistically, genetically or cul-turally common with someone from Spain
Culturally, linguistically and genetically the East Asian looking phenotype of Northeast India is indeed quite different from most of Assam, Bengal and rest of India. The language family is predominantly Tibeto-burman and sino-tibeto-burman. The sino component is most prevalent in Arunachal Pradesh tribes. Khasi, kachahri May be austroasiatic.
Wdym by sino-tibeto-burman, there's no such as that. They are all same, the only difference is that in sinitic languages they use Chinese scripts whereas in other languages of the family they use different scripts hence the name tibeto-burman. They were once called tibeto-chinese/sino-tibetan, the tibeto-burman concept is new. Linguistically the NE languages are much more similar to Chinese than with burmese or Tibetan.
@@Chisiu12 You are wrong , north east Indian tibeto burmans are closer to tibetan and burmese then Chinese dialects. Even my language i.e mizo(chin-kuki-mizo)closes relative is burman language.
@@littleninjavangchhia9099 pls don't tell me.
@@littleninjavangchhia9099 I have a thorough study of anthropology and burmese is not even a one single bit similar with sino-tibetan Languages of India nor china, even the tribal languages of burma is so different from burmese and has similarity with Northeastern languages rather than burmese.
@@littleninjavangchhia9099 vangchhia tell me in what way does this word for "you" Which is "sain" Similar to Ning, na and nang of NE Indian languages. In Chinese languages it is na and nin, much more closer with NE Indian languages. Words like beautiful which is meltha in mizo and meltra in kuki, is "lasaw-a-sainn" In burmese does this seem even a one bit Similar to you? The same in Chinese is "Meili-da". Almost all indians have origin from southern china not Tibet or burma. Tibetic languages are Bodpa, sherpa, denzongpa, drukpa, gurung, tamang, limbu, khampa and so on and have little to no similarity with NE Indian languages, NE languages have more words in common with the chinese languages, also stop commenting anyhow without knowing and think logically southern China is just next home, it's so close whereas bammar population is actually much more further than the border the indo-myanmar border is shield by arkanese, naga, chin, rakhaine and other tribal state and beyond that bamar people live in Irrawaddy River.
The only people in NE and who's languages are actually of Tibetan origin are the denzongpa who speak drenzoke and monpa.
3:14 what is that mix? What makes them look different from the rest?
It's the geography, Enviornment,
Windy and cold environment caused smaller eyes and lighter skin
But this didn't happen all of a sudden
After thousand years of withstanding the climate and environment, our looks changed
@@arupjyotisarma976 It's not only the geographic location yk it's also in our dna
As we move eastward plains, northwards mountainous heights, their situational adaptability differs and it evolves in their physical appearance ,which made them a subtle ethnic touch. Thus we all have the same DNA,no difference untill some leftist made 20yrs brainwashing therapy...
lmao
we didn't move eastwards
no try to think us as ancients 'indians'
@@pathoithingz4320 your missionary fed fake thoughts from far far sandLand, in lieu of rice bag and psychological miracle(magician acts etc) have created an inferiority complex.its not yours problem, but a few crypto xristian fringe groups are conditioned for 2-3 generations ,for a self denial. Don't worry ,your kids will repair you people's thoughts in this internet era.
keep being delusional
@@neoneoneoOne that's a slippery slope fallacy
No sir, iam from arunachal. Still today we have oral recitations of how our ancestors traveled from mongolia south( which is a part of China today) to Himalayas and then to arunachal today. You are really wrong here. We are of mongolian origin( country not the race) . However due to gap of many generations , variations in dialects and practices developed. Meanwhile, till today, some words,names,surnames, some cultural practices are similar to chinese culture (not tibetans). Tibetans were our business partners, they provided us Himalayan salt mostly. In barter exchange , we gave them food, meat, animals, animal skin etc.
It is believed that our ancestors were nomads thousands of years ago. From mongolia they reached Eling lake and gyaring lake and then to nyigchi and atlast settled in tsangpo river basin. Even from todays myanmar also ,people migrated thousands of years ago which wasn't demarcated at those times as countries.
Why the ppl look different in NE region,cause they migrated fo sure,and originally not Indians , and I don't know why ppl insult such looking ppl ,but these looking ppl were rocking around the world,eg Genghis Khan and still they r rocking,like Muay Thai legends ,ufc fighters,yayyyyyy!!!
But why the appearance is different like Chinese, japani.. so one can easily find out different appearance mostly faces
@@Sticklemako yup right
Yes we are!
Finally Science debunking propoganda history !
Jai Shree Ram 🚩
Missing tribe of Assam is Mongolian
I'm from Assam and my Caste is Kolita कलिता, its a Kshatriya Varna. We are not Mangoloid.
Assamaese language has Sanskrit origin..
Our tribe is also indo Mongolian
Bro we generally we accepted as part of a great Mongoloid wave of migration from China and later moved out to India to their present habitat. It is possible that we Mizo came from Shinlung or Chhinlungsan located on the banks of the river Yalung in China.as the moment of fact we are apart of the Mongolian race
Thank you. Very enlightening🙏🏼
Sir ,i got a question, that north east ppl ,thier looks different,body features more like east and south east asian countries, culture totally different from mainland India,why would our ancestors be Indian , i think if not mongolia then must be some other east or south east asian countries,but im sure they wre not indian initially. So where did they came from exactly, yes language is tibeto Burmese,but but but but ....but tibeto Burmese also migrated from elsewhere. I m going by body features ok .
Mongoloid race is just a term given to people belonging to certain physical characteristics group or race. It does not have anything to do with belonging from the country Mongolia.
Thank you sir for your word of wisdom
Hidimba was from cachar northeast but after marring bhim nd their child they moved to Himachal, nd ghatotkach took birth in Himachal nd Bheem left her in Himachal....check Vedas nd full Sanskrit Mahabharata....hidimba was a mayabi demon but good one...so just think what a mayabi demon can do with their powers nd chants....
You mush come down here and research ...not by seating in a sofha with a laptop .....
We came from China Yunan province we arent indian by blood but by nationality
Nice propaganda bruh. I'm a Naga, got my DNA tested via 23& me, turns out I'm 89% Chinese & Mongolian, 7% Central Asian & 4% Inuit. Anyone who does not agree with me can get it done & see by themselves. Peace out.
How does this his work and where did u do it
@@mongpurechang8459 23&Me
Sir. Why do u seem jumpy when east India is discussed & patriotism takes over. 🙏🏼
The problem with the race based argument of a "nation" is that it's built on the assumption that for people to be part of a nation they have to share common genetic ancestry. This has it's roots in early 20th century European nationalism when racial theory was widely used for purely political purposes under the guise of "nationalism". In modern Europe , this topic will be an embarrassment even for a dinner table conversation . Now coming to the question of North East India , almost all of the indigenous population in the North East will have genetic markers that are associated with ethnicities in rest of South East Asia. This includes not just groups belonging to Tibeto-Burman but also Austro-Asiatic language families. A Khasi native of Meghalaya is most likely to find genetic markers common with Khmer people in Cambodia. This is how population genomics work , it's not based on how national boundaries are defined. He is right that there is no scientific basis of race. At the same time , he mentions that there are common genetic markers found in northeastern ethnicity that are common with rest of India. Those markers will also be present in people of Pakistan , Afghanistan and possibly that entire region. Does that make them Indian? The root of the problem is the premise of the question itself. So what if people in the NE are "Mongolian"? ( I think the personal here is simply referring to facial features just as what a layman in the west would call "Asian" or "oriental") .
Abhijit, you have discussed well on section or class of North East people... Tibeto Burman. Mongoloid is a race... Like Black and the Caucasians. And to add further Sikkim has its ethnic grouping in Tibetan not burmese. What is Tibeto Burman after all.... We did not originated from them
The earliest sikkimese r lepcha, limboo tribe n they r more closer to bodo, naga not tibbetan. Also Nepal migrated khambu( rai ), yakkha etc more closer to North East Indian than tibbetan. Bhutia, sherpa, yolmo, tamang, gurung r closer to tibbetan. But they r later migrant from tibbet directly, through nepal. So it's wrong to be called sikkimese r tibbetan when it's earliest tribes more closer to bodo, naga, southern Chinese. In terms of race.
Does people in South East Asia have South Asian ancestry through Indianization?