Rāmāyaṇa & Mahābhārata were also part of the syllabus of gurukuls & schooling before Britishers destroyed it. They are case studies of our ancestors with additional stories & metaphors to learn about Dharma. ☸️
Some people will ask how unbelievable and unexceptional strengths shown in Puranas can be true stories . The logical answer for this is found at hinduismfaq.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/puranas-are-myths-that-talks-about-giants-gods-who-lives-thousand-of-years/ .
In my school we have ramayan and mahabharatha textbooks and test was also held.bohra(shia muslim ) use to top this test and also in oral exams he use to explain beautifully.😊
Good that she takes pride when she says its our "Itihaas"🕉️🙏.....while many try to demean by saying its mythology....some of them are in comments itself..
@@rahullihitkar8939Why do we need to provide evidence? 'Itihaasa' itself is a Sanskrit word that we have been using since millennias for Ramayana & Mahabharata. That's the tradition of our Rishis. You don't wanna believe it? Then nobody is asking you to. But stop ridiculing believers, cause at the end of the day, the word 'Itihaasa' itself is from Hindu scriptures and has its distinct definition. Western concept of 'history' is a few centuries old. Who has asked you to use these terms as synonyms?
@@rahullihitkar8939 Problem is not with asking evidence but denying it's existence when evidence was always present...... Ram setu was always there..... Hindus are just brainwashed today....end goal is to convert that's all
@@rahullihitkar8939if ASI completes the drowned Dwarka city survey and provide us with detailed and point to point report of the city survey. Then we are gonna be 100 percent, sure. Please ASI and GOI do the survey and end the matter for one and all. Period.
The common question one has is why Ramayana and Mahabharata has unbelievable characters or incidents like ravan having 10 heads, talking ape like creatures called vanaras or hanuman ji trying to eat sun globe (humans cannot even see the sun directly from earth itself). This is answered at hinduismfaq.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/puranas-are-myths-that-talks-about-giants-gods-who-lives-thousand-of-years/
The common question one has is why Ramayana and Mahabharata has unbelievable characters or incidents like ravan having 10 heads, talking ape like creatures called vanaras or hanuman ji trying to eat sun globe (humans cannot even see the sun directly from earth itself). This is answered at hinduismfaq.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/puranas-are-myths-that-talks-about-giants-gods-who-lives-thousand-of-years/
Hanumānji doing namaskar towards Shri Rām is one of the oldest depictions of him. One can see this even in the depiction made by Sugreev on a bolder in Kodanda Rama Swamy Temple, Hampi (Ancient Kishkinda). (This temple also makes the spot where Bali was killed & Sugreev was coronated).
another thing abt raavan is, eventhough he was so powerfull,he kidnapped maa sita like a coward when ram was not around.bec he knew tht man who broke the bow of shiva cnt be normal man bec it was only possible if the man was an avatar of vishnu or shiva.he actually feared ram from the start bt his senses overtook his logical mind nd met his death
Regarding Sita mata's agni pariksha, I think it's also important to remember that Sita mata is a bhakta of Shri Ram. Yes, they have a husband/wife relationship, but they also have a Bhagwan/Bhakta relationship in the theological sense. So this particular sankalp of Shri Ram is fulfilled by Sita mata through their uninterrupted and deep interpersonal relationship.
She is not bhakt of lord ram, ofcoure they both are devotee to each other, she is adi parashakti of lord ram. Siya sobha nahi jaaye bhakani Jagdambik Roop gun khaan. Maaa siya lift shiva dhanu first in childhood, latter Sri ram. Lord Sri raam because Sri ram after marry Sridevi. In mahabharata ved vaya himself says, maaa rukmini is Mahalakshmi herself, early life, is she was sita, as when Hanuman ji see maaa rukmini, he see sita. Lord Hanuman is not only devotee of lord ram, also maa sita, when he opens his heart, there was sitaram both. Lord Hanuman when met maaa sita in Ashok vatika, she has given him vardan of asat shidi, or nav Nidhi.
@@venkata224 both lord ram or maa sita, born has human, but both birth is Divine, raja Dasrath has done a yagna, putra yasti yagna, than lord, come in khoslaya womb. Maaa sita from earth, Look at it, both come from completely opposite direction. Lord ram is completely bound with responsibility, every decision he talk in full of bound by the person, son, king, Other hand maaa sita is nature, she is free spirit, every decision she take fire mind. They are different but yet they are also similar both know there dharam.
Excellent knowledge mam people like you should do like these podcasts and shows more often for our young especially HINDU youth boys and girls to know more about our culture and our mythology but one correction it was vysaraja not madhwacharya who built 726 HANUMAN temples thank you JAY SHREE RAM 🙏
I think the cleaning, painting and decorating of houses before Deepawali is a practical necessity. The monsoon rains would have caused some damage and mould on the walls. Houses needed scrubbing and repairs before festival times. Putting a religious deadline to it ensured everyone did it, even the sloppy and the lazy.
You people don't know the actual meaning of "mythology"... Mythology doesn't always mean fake or fictional stories. Mythology means a notion and belief system of a cult of people, which may be true and may not be true. History narrates facts without any mystical or fantasy elements. It frankly speaks about the facts the way they are. But mythology narrates an incident which may have been historical, in a metaphoric and symbolical way. And it does the narration in such a way that the people can learn something from them. So Ramayan and Mahabharat can be termed as "mythology".
Some people will ask how unbelievable and unexceptional strengths shown in Puranas can be true stories . The logical answer for this is found at hinduismfaq.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/puranas-are-myths-that-talks-about-giants-gods-who-lives-thousand-of-years/ .
Why is the host not responding to any of the answers Ami ji is giving? Is she not able to understand/ to digest the truth or is she the same in all the interviews?
exactly , podcasts should have hosts that can engage in a conversation , this was for most of the parts a monologue (Ami ji did a brilliant job explaining the myths around our history ) , still a lot of interesting cross questioning could've been done.
She is not responding that much bcos Amiji has a ton of information to provide and limited time to share that. She is receiving information and making gentle observations/asking questions. I think she is an excellent cover for this podcast in the context of this specific podcast. Podcasts format don’t necessarily have to be a conversation.
Thank you giving platform to an incredible mind! Paused and reminded quite a few section to listen and make notes. Placed an order for Valmiki Ramayan to educate myself further. Best wishes to the host and the guest.
Really a very nice podcast on Ramayan , thank you for sharing the precious knowledge of Ramayam . Ami Ganatra mam very nicely explained some of the knowledge of Ramayan ithi has. Karishma mehta mam was really relaxed , calm and composed, this calm and composed aura of karishma mehta mam was reflecting on me while i was watching the podcast, Really nice podcast 👌 Thank you karishma mehta mam and Ami Ganatra Mam. Both played their roles really well to bring out the best from this podcast.
An episode that busted many popular myths or misinformations about Rāmāyana with beautiful explanations👍 thanks to the Humans of Bombay team and Ami ji🙏
Amiji is as always wonderful. Please keep spreading the Truth about our culture and history. 🎉love you🙏🎉🎉🎉Ravaan was a very very learned man but he was was a very Great perverted fanatical Rakshas a Milachi. His pervertions led to his downfall. JAI SRI RAM🎉JAI SRI KRISHNA🎉🎉🎉
Every Hindu, Sanatani has 0% doubt that Ramayana and Mahabharata are 100% true. I dont care even 1% if non hindus dont believe in it. They can believe whatever they want. Truth cannot be defined by beliefs. Truth IS Truth. Beliefs keep changing every passing second.
Beautiful and inspiring.. thank you for bringing out thid episode. Look forward to viewing more content like this , which is rooted in Indian history ans culture
I would request that Ms. Ami Ganatra must give lecture on Women Empowerment in all big Corporate world from the perspective of our Ancient History and set the example by giving the Role played by Women in our Ancient times. And how much they were empowered to fight even Demons. For eg: Mata Sita was empowered enough that she chose Shri Ram before Swayamvar. Due to her power Shri Rama was able to broke the Shiva Dhanush. She had enough power to fight with Demon King Ravana within a few minute. Because she had power of Mata Shakti(ie: Durga), blessings. But it is not her job. It was her husband Shri Rama has to fight and prove himself. In today's word "Status Quo". Before Yudh with Ravana, Shri Ram had to do "Shakti" puja to get the blessings of Mata Durga. Again you can say the Women Power to fight such a big Warrior. So, our ancient history is full of Women Empowerment. But we lost this in last 1000 years due to Islamic devil pigs invasion. Today it is coming back but with different ideology only for Corporate World, ie: Leftist ideology, which has no meaning in real sense in society. If we say real sense for Society, than take eg: of Rani Chennamma, Rani Nakkati, Jhansi Ki Rani, Rani Jijabai - mother of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Ms. Nivedita(Azad Hind Sena), Mrs. Sarojini Naidu(India's Freedom fighter), Mrs. Kasturba Gandhi, Mrs. Indira Gandhi(Late PM of India) and many more. India is only country in world where all Great Women participated and fought for India's Freedom.
This happens when people have not read the original text written by Valimki and have all kinds of wrong notions about it. I can't believe that she decided to interview Ami (who is well versed in both Ramayana and Mahabharata) and chose to not read the original text or atleast her book which is a great folly on her part as an interviewer and what amazes me even more is that when the person she is interviewing is trying to correct her perception she is not ready to listen!!! Just wow!
Karishma is like other feminists i witness on social media who never bothered to read Valmiki Ramayan or know about it but still they think Ravan was so great and a true feminist. The fact as per Valmiki Ramayan is that Ravan was just opposite of that.
He had ten heads and each head represented a vice- lust, anger, ego... Ami pointed out he was not a Bhakt of Shiva from the very beginning. He tried to raise Kailash parvat using his 20 arms but Shiva pressed his toe trapping his arms. He was warned by most of his family members (Mandodari, Kaikeshi- mother) and some of his ministers (Malyavan- his grandfather) and yet he decided to continue to do bad deeds and keep Maa Sita a prisoner.
In next 7 years this channel will have most subscribed content channel... This channel doesn't know but sky is the limit for them because of their honest innocence
Ami ji I have watched many of your interviews given to various TH-cam channels and podcasts and like them all. I also like the point that how you are more interested in the facts based on the original author's work of Ramayana and Mahabharata. As usual in this interview also you have explained many things about Ramayana based on Valmiki's work. It’s really interesting to know about lesser known facts and the way how you explain it to audience In the interview at the end, while explaining about the Hanumanji and his Gadha you mentioned about Maadhavacharya and him establishing around 700 temples of Hanumanji during 11th century. I am not sure if you are referring to the same person as I understood or someone else, if it is yes then it is true that the Gadha is not depicted in those temples but I want to bring to your notice that a couple of misunderstanding about this topic 1. First it is about the name. The correct name is Madhvacharya (मध्वाचार्य ) and not Maadhavacharya (माधवाचार्य ). Because if I am not wrong they are two different persons in history lived during different time periods with these names. मध्वाचार्य is a philosopher during 13CE who propounded the philosophy of TatvaVada popularly known as Dvaita philosophy. Madhvacharya ji has also told about the contamination of the original scriptures with interpolations due to various reasons during that period (700 years ago) itself and spread light on actual interpretation of History & Puranas according to the original author and in-line with eternal Vedas. In this regard he also authored some works like Mahabharata Tatparya Nirnaya, Bhagavatha Tatparya Nirnaya etc., Whereas Maadhavacharya(माधवाचार्य ) is one of the pontiff in the lineage of Mayavada philosophy popularly known as Advaitha propounded by Adi Shankaracharya. माधवाचार्य is a pontiff of Sringeri Sharadha Peetham (also known as Vidyaranya or Maadhava Vidyaranya) and has also authored many works. He also helped the founding kings Harihara and Bukkaraya to establish the Vijayanagara Empire and served as mentor and guide for three generations 2. Second is regarding the establishment of 700 Hanumanji temples. It is not established by Maadhavacharya (माधवाचार्य ) but they were established by Vyasatheertha during 15th century who is a pontiff in the lineage of Madhvacharya(मध्वाचार्य ), probably 11th pontiff in the Madhvacharya's lineage. He also happens to be the Rajaguru for famous king KrishnaDevaraya of Vijayanagara Empire.
thanks for this brother , but please do not refer advait philosophy as mayavad because , because dvaitvadi ppl call advait philosophy mayavad due to their ignorance
@@rggrrggr290 I am not calling Maya Vada in a negative sense, my understanding is that Maya Vada means the principle which advocates the concept of Maya (that is Jagath Mityatva). So my intention is not to demean any Sampradaya I just used it thinking it is the old or original name.
I see some people in the comment section saying Rama was a mythological character and they are being replied that it isn't. Don't bother to counter the mythological statement, it won't change who Lord Rama was, hazaro aaye hazaro gaye lekin yeh itihaas koi nahi mita payega and some of you are calling the host woke, well it isn't her fault. You will find many people on the street who will say Ravan was great because he didn't touch Sita but they don't know the real reason. So jaane do, let it be.
Ram Setu is real Prem ki Nishani. Taj Mahal is "Ayyashi" ki Nishani. And we saw the result of that Shahajan's "Ayyashi" ki nishani in "Shaheen Baug" protest - all illegitimate descendent of Shahajan.
Thanks for showing the world the truth of Ravan, there are many foolish people who think Ravan was someone great, he was an arrogant, egoistic, super strong rapist and molester, it's the serials which have made him into a god like character
Laxmiji appeared on diwali in samudra manthan and vishnu-laxmi marriage was held on diwali so laxmi poojan is done.later on same day Ramji came back on same day.
Can you tell us the title of the movie you played scenes from during this episode? I am always floored by the level of intelligence displayed by you and your guests.
The host sounds like illiterate on Hindu itihas, making stupid statements. Thanks to Ami for taking all these stupid questions and explaining with best possible answer.
@@humansofbombay2801 vese apka itna gyan lene ka koi fayda nahi hai. kyuki hame pata hai ap sab paise ke liye karte ho. kyuki ager apko gyan aur dharm ka sach main gyan hota toh apko ye pata hota ki apko apne channel per kise bulana hai aur kise nahi. maine apka channel dekha aur usmain bahut log aise the jo adharmi hai aur apke ander itni takat nahi thi ki ap unki ideology per saval kar sako. main bas itna kahunga adharm sabke liye adharm hi hota hai future main apke bacche bhi use bhugtenge kyuki apke ander adharmi ko adharmi kehne ki takat nahi hai balki ap unhe apne channel per bula ke famous kar rahe ho. ager baat dimag main ghusi ho toh thoda manthan karna ispe
Samajh mein aata hai when one person is so passionate about a topic while the other is visibly not. It is hard to watch her sometimes. Episode made watchable only thanks to Ami ji's knowledge and charisma (pun intended). I think it came down to the limited knowledge of the host and the fact that all her questions were written down for her on her tablet. The she was reading the full question and not just looking for a keyword for a reminder of questions she actually she has.
2 things i want to add. 1..Just after slapping Manthara for her evil words on Ram, Kaikeyi started followinv her worda. Bcoz, on touching bad people their evil nature comes to us. 2nd....Lord Ram had never send his wife Mata Sita to exile. It is prakhipta.
यावत् स्थास्यन्ति गिरयस्सरितश्च महीतले । तावद्रामायणकथा लोकेषु प्रचरिष्यति ।।1.2.36।। As long as the mountains and rivers exist on this earth, the story of Rāmāyaṇa will prevail among the people.
Ramayana we Bharatas call Itihaas as it was! The colonialist called it mythology as they couldn’t face the truth as it’s older than abrahamic religions. ❤
Rāmāyaṇa & Mahābhārata were also part of the syllabus of gurukuls & schooling before Britishers destroyed it. They are case studies of our ancestors with additional stories & metaphors to learn about Dharma. ☸️
Some people will ask how unbelievable and unexceptional strengths shown in Puranas can be true stories . The logical answer for this is found at hinduismfaq.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/puranas-are-myths-that-talks-about-giants-gods-who-lives-thousand-of-years/ .
correct
In my school we have ramayan and mahabharatha textbooks and test was also held.bohra(shia muslim ) use to top this test and also in oral exams he use to explain beautifully.😊
Good that she takes pride when she says its our "Itihaas"🕉️🙏.....while many try to demean by saying its mythology....some of them are in comments itself..
Asking evidence isn't rational thinking to do? Muslim also believe that Quran is word of Allah but then shouldn't you ask for evidence?
@@rahullihitkar8939Why do we need to provide evidence?
'Itihaasa' itself is a Sanskrit word that we have been using since millennias for Ramayana & Mahabharata. That's the tradition of our Rishis.
You don't wanna believe it? Then nobody is asking you to.
But stop ridiculing believers, cause at the end of the day, the word 'Itihaasa' itself is from Hindu scriptures and has its distinct definition.
Western concept of 'history' is a few centuries old.
Who has asked you to use these terms as synonyms?
@@rahullihitkar8939 Problem is not with asking evidence but denying it's existence when evidence was always present...... Ram setu was always there..... Hindus are just brainwashed today....end goal is to convert that's all
@@rahullihitkar8939if ASI completes the drowned Dwarka city survey and provide us with detailed and point to point report of the city survey.
Then we are gonna be 100 percent, sure.
Please ASI and GOI do the survey and end the matter for one and all.
Period.
Ami ganatra should be the role model of every hindu youth .
See, how the difference between the one who knows and the one who pretends is clearly visible.
Ami is the one who knows.
Pretender of Bombay 😂
🤣🤣
The common question one has is why Ramayana and Mahabharata has unbelievable characters or incidents like ravan having 10 heads, talking ape like creatures called vanaras or hanuman ji trying to eat sun globe (humans cannot even see the sun directly from earth itself). This is answered at hinduismfaq.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/puranas-are-myths-that-talks-about-giants-gods-who-lives-thousand-of-years/
Valimiki was not the first author of Ramayana, it was Hanuman ji, But he kept it hidden under the water. To inspire Valimiki.
@@skilltopguide9738 bruh
Ami Gantra is intellectual lady,,,,, incredible,,,,
❤️❤️
The common question one has is why Ramayana and Mahabharata has unbelievable characters or incidents like ravan having 10 heads, talking ape like creatures called vanaras or hanuman ji trying to eat sun globe (humans cannot even see the sun directly from earth itself). This is answered at hinduismfaq.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/puranas-are-myths-that-talks-about-giants-gods-who-lives-thousand-of-years/
"The greatest among the intelligent"
I'm getting goosebumps listening to this ❤
Ganatra is too polite for this bimbette. She needed a J Sai Deepak. He would have schooled her a lesson she'd never forget.
I invested my precious 55 min for this and am satisfied . Empowered and purified
Hanumānji doing namaskar towards Shri Rām is one of the oldest depictions of him. One can see this even in the depiction made by Sugreev on a bolder in Kodanda Rama Swamy Temple, Hampi (Ancient Kishkinda).
(This temple also makes the spot where Bali was killed & Sugreev was coronated).
the depth of her knowledge is great
Whenever I think that I know everything about Ramayana, then some new fact comes in front of me.
another thing abt raavan is, eventhough he was so powerfull,he kidnapped maa sita like a coward when ram was not around.bec he knew tht man who broke the bow of shiva cnt be normal man bec it was only possible if the man was an avatar of vishnu or shiva.he actually feared ram from the start bt his senses overtook his logical mind nd met his death
This is the only episode I am ever going to watch on this channel
power pack
always a pleasure to listen to ami ji
Regarding Sita mata's agni pariksha, I think it's also important to remember that Sita mata is a bhakta of Shri Ram. Yes, they have a husband/wife relationship, but they also have a Bhagwan/Bhakta relationship in the theological sense. So this particular sankalp of Shri Ram is fulfilled by Sita mata through their uninterrupted and deep interpersonal relationship.
No, Please do not create assumption on your basis. She was not bhakt. You are writing anything,
@@abhishek2026True
You are forgetting that Rama was born a human but Sita was still divine here.
She is not bhakt of lord ram, ofcoure they both are devotee to each other, she is adi parashakti of lord ram.
Siya sobha nahi jaaye bhakani
Jagdambik Roop gun khaan.
Maaa siya lift shiva dhanu first in childhood, latter Sri ram.
Lord Sri raam because Sri ram after marry Sridevi.
In mahabharata ved vaya himself says, maaa rukmini is Mahalakshmi herself, early life, is she was sita, as when Hanuman ji see maaa rukmini, he see sita.
Lord Hanuman is not only devotee of lord ram, also maa sita, when he opens his heart, there was sitaram both.
Lord Hanuman when met maaa sita in Ashok vatika, she has given him vardan of asat shidi, or nav Nidhi.
@@venkata224 both lord ram or maa sita, born has human, but both birth is Divine, raja Dasrath has done a yagna, putra yasti yagna, than lord, come in khoslaya womb.
Maaa sita from earth,
Look at it, both come from completely opposite direction.
Lord ram is completely bound with responsibility, every decision he talk in full of bound by the person, son, king,
Other hand maaa sita is nature, she is free spirit, every decision she take fire mind. They are different but yet they are also similar both know there dharam.
Very matured narration by the scholar.
Excellent knowledge mam people like you should do like these podcasts and shows more often for our young especially HINDU youth boys and girls to know more about our culture and our mythology but one correction it was vysaraja not madhwacharya who built 726 HANUMAN temples thank you JAY SHREE RAM 🙏
There is nothing like mythology in Hinduism. Read more and more because u are still ignorant
Wonderful. It's always pleasure to listen to ami ji. Ami ji plz start a series of ramayan reading with padya and meaning and interpretation.
I think the cleaning, painting and decorating of houses before Deepawali is a practical necessity. The monsoon rains would have caused some damage and mould on the walls. Houses needed scrubbing and repairs before festival times. Putting a religious deadline to it ensured everyone did it, even the sloppy and the lazy.
29:01 - Ram’s agnipariksha 🙏
So much to learn from this! 🙏🏻❤️
Don't call it mythology it's our history
You people don't know the actual meaning of "mythology"... Mythology doesn't always mean fake or fictional stories. Mythology means a notion and belief system of a cult of people, which may be true and may not be true. History narrates facts without any mystical or fantasy elements. It frankly speaks about the facts the way they are. But mythology narrates an incident which may have been historical, in a metaphoric and symbolical way. And it does the narration in such a way that the people can learn something from them. So Ramayan and Mahabharat can be termed as "mythology".
This question should be invalid by now..
@@leobuzz212whatever 😐, Ramayan is our history not mythology that's truth
Some people will ask how unbelievable and unexceptional strengths shown in Puranas can be true stories . The logical answer for this is found at hinduismfaq.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/puranas-are-myths-that-talks-about-giants-gods-who-lives-thousand-of-years/ .
yes it is...
Idk what fashion has become to support ravan.. to demonise ram ji...i hope sense prevail...cudos to ami mam for stood on ground❤❤
The Host is wonderful asking the proper question very politely. Thank you Mam.Wonderful both of you🎉
JAI SRI RAM🎉JAI SRI KRISHNA🎉
Lol
Why is the host not responding to any of the answers Ami ji is giving? Is she not able to understand/ to digest the truth or is she the same in all the interviews?
exactly , podcasts should have hosts that can engage in a conversation , this was for most of the parts a monologue (Ami ji did a brilliant job explaining the myths around our history ) , still a lot of interesting cross questioning could've been done.
This one seems to be a Ravan fan.
Make Up pe jyada dhyan diya hai madam ne
The host is not interfering being a very very good host. Good girl🎉
She is not responding that much bcos Amiji has a ton of information to provide and limited time to share that. She is receiving information and making gentle observations/asking questions. I think she is an excellent cover for this podcast in the context of this specific podcast.
Podcasts format don’t necessarily have to be a conversation.
Beautiful conversation
❤️❤️
I can listen to Ami Ganatra as many times as I could and keep knowing more about our history.
It's our History ❤❤❤
Thank you giving platform to an incredible mind! Paused and reminded quite a few section to listen and make notes. Placed an order for Valmiki Ramayan to educate myself further. Best wishes to the host and the guest.
Really a very nice podcast on Ramayan , thank you for sharing the precious knowledge of Ramayam .
Ami Ganatra mam very nicely explained some of the knowledge of Ramayan ithi has.
Karishma mehta mam was really relaxed , calm and composed, this calm and composed aura of karishma mehta mam was reflecting on me while i was watching the podcast,
Really nice podcast 👌
Thank you karishma mehta mam and Ami Ganatra Mam. Both played their roles really well to bring out the best from this podcast.
Anchor seems to be kind of Ravana fan 😂 JAI SHREE RAM
Woke army
38:15 - Lakshman, the loyal brother 🙏
❤️❤️❤️
It's always enriching to listen to Ami Ganatra. Her knowledge as well as narration are amazing!
An episode that busted many popular myths or misinformations about Rāmāyana with beautiful explanations👍 thanks to the Humans of Bombay team and Ami ji🙏
It was a wonderful episode. Loved it. Very deep meaning
Amiji is as always wonderful. Please keep spreading the Truth about our culture and history. 🎉love you🙏🎉🎉🎉Ravaan was a very very learned man but he was was a very Great perverted fanatical Rakshas a Milachi. His pervertions led to his downfall.
JAI SRI RAM🎉JAI SRI KRISHNA🎉🎉🎉
Every Hindu, Sanatani has 0% doubt that Ramayana and Mahabharata are 100% true. I dont care even 1% if non hindus dont believe in it. They can believe whatever they want. Truth cannot be defined by beliefs. Truth IS Truth. Beliefs keep changing every passing second.
Jai Bhagwan Adi-Shaktimaan Ravilochan RAM.
बहुत सुन्दर विश्लेषण एवम प्रस्तुति। धन्यवाद।।
Such an insightful and knowledgable episode! ❤ I had no idea of the depth of Indian mythology.
Thank you for engaging! ❤️
Mythology ? She clearly telling it's Ithas
You always try to Downgrade own culture
Just start reading Valmiki written ramayana.
Lmao. It seems u learnt nothing from this episode. Kid both Ramayan and Mahabharat are mentioned as Itihasa which means they're history
Dummy stop saying mythology. It's history.
First understand the meaning of myth. 😂😂😂
Ravan's fan will learn many new lesson. Lord Ram is the greatest.
Very insightful!!!!
Lot of indians don't know about ramayana and mahabharat but this will help.
Wow Amiji. Felt like it should never end. ❤ Thanks
Host : "Did it happen?"
Ami Ji : " It definitely happened."
No it didn't
@@Spiritkill1yeah new historian in town
Beautiful conversation ❤
Thanks for the enlightening discussion by Amiji.Hari Om
Lakshmanji is my favorite in all Ramayan
49:07, "I didn't know this", jaise baaki sab pata tha 😂😂😂.
Excellent Explanation, 🙏🙏🙏
Beautiful and inspiring.. thank you for bringing out thid episode. Look forward to viewing more content like this , which is rooted in Indian history ans culture
Very insightful and helpful podcasts. Jai Shri Ram
जो भगवान के गुणों का वर्णन करे वो हमारे लिए पुजनीय है इसलिए मैं इनको प्रणाम करता हु ।🙏🙏🙏
I would request that Ms. Ami Ganatra must give lecture on Women Empowerment in all big Corporate world from the perspective of our Ancient History and set the example by giving the Role played by Women in our Ancient times. And how much they were empowered to fight even Demons.
For eg: Mata Sita was empowered enough that she chose Shri Ram before Swayamvar. Due to her power Shri Rama was able to broke the Shiva Dhanush.
She had enough power to fight with Demon King Ravana within a few minute. Because she had power of Mata Shakti(ie: Durga), blessings. But it is not her job. It was her husband Shri Rama has to fight and prove himself. In today's word "Status Quo".
Before Yudh with Ravana, Shri Ram had to do "Shakti" puja to get the blessings of Mata Durga. Again you can say the Women Power to fight such a big Warrior.
So, our ancient history is full of Women Empowerment.
But we lost this in last 1000 years due to Islamic devil pigs invasion.
Today it is coming back but with different ideology only for Corporate World, ie: Leftist ideology, which has no meaning in real sense in society.
If we say real sense for Society, than take eg: of Rani Chennamma, Rani Nakkati, Jhansi Ki Rani, Rani Jijabai - mother of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Ms. Nivedita(Azad Hind Sena), Mrs. Sarojini Naidu(India's Freedom fighter), Mrs. Kasturba Gandhi, Mrs. Indira Gandhi(Late PM of India) and many more.
India is only country in world where all Great Women participated and fought for India's Freedom.
Karishma be like mereko kya pata raavan is great in my heart.. typical elitist..!!
😂😂😂. Her response after what Ami said about Ravana is such a classic example of selective listening and ignorance.
This happens when people have not read the original text written by Valimki and have all kinds of wrong notions about it. I can't believe that she decided to interview Ami (who is well versed in both Ramayana and Mahabharata) and chose to not read the original text or atleast her book which is a great folly on her part as an interviewer and what amazes me even more is that when the person she is interviewing is trying to correct her perception she is not ready to listen!!! Just wow!
"That is Dussehra more than Diwali" - 😂 too good.
Great episode, highly informative and an eye opener,as always 💐
Greetings💐
Exactly
Ramayana Mahabharata not mythology...these epics are purely true and full of wisdom....Hare Krishna
Never knew these things about ramayan!
Neither did we! 🙏🏻❤️
facts are coming in light.
Thank you for doing this episode, I learnt so much! ❤
Mam listening to u was such a pleasure
Thank u for telling us things we need to know
U r amazing
Karishma is like other feminists i witness on social media who never bothered to read Valmiki Ramayan or know about it but still they think Ravan was so great and a true feminist. The fact as per Valmiki Ramayan is that Ravan was just opposite of that.
He had ten heads and each head represented a vice- lust, anger, ego... Ami pointed out he was not a Bhakt of Shiva from the very beginning. He tried to raise Kailash parvat using his 20 arms but Shiva pressed his toe trapping his arms. He was warned by most of his family members (Mandodari, Kaikeshi- mother) and some of his ministers (Malyavan- his grandfather) and yet he decided to continue to do bad deeds and keep Maa Sita a prisoner.
In next 7 years this channel will have most subscribed content channel... This channel doesn't know but sky is the limit for them because of their honest innocence
Ami ji I have watched many of your interviews given to various TH-cam channels and podcasts and like them all. I also like the point that how you are more interested in the facts based on the original author's work of Ramayana and Mahabharata.
As usual in this interview also you have explained many things about Ramayana based on Valmiki's work. It’s really interesting to know about lesser known facts and the way how you explain it to audience
In the interview at the end, while explaining about the Hanumanji and his Gadha you mentioned about Maadhavacharya and him establishing around 700 temples of Hanumanji during 11th century. I am not sure if you are referring to the same person as I understood or someone else, if it is yes then it is true that the Gadha is not depicted in those temples but I want to bring to your notice that a couple of misunderstanding about this topic
1. First it is about the name. The correct name is Madhvacharya (मध्वाचार्य ) and not Maadhavacharya (माधवाचार्य ). Because if I am not wrong they are two different persons in history lived during different time periods with these names.
मध्वाचार्य is a philosopher during 13CE who propounded the philosophy of TatvaVada popularly known as Dvaita philosophy. Madhvacharya ji has also told about the contamination of the original scriptures with interpolations due to various reasons during that period (700 years ago) itself and spread light on actual interpretation of History & Puranas according to the original author and in-line with eternal Vedas. In this regard he also authored some works like Mahabharata Tatparya Nirnaya, Bhagavatha Tatparya Nirnaya etc.,
Whereas Maadhavacharya(माधवाचार्य ) is one of the pontiff in the lineage of Mayavada philosophy popularly known as Advaitha propounded by Adi Shankaracharya. माधवाचार्य is a pontiff of Sringeri Sharadha Peetham (also known as Vidyaranya or Maadhava Vidyaranya) and has also authored many works. He also helped the founding kings Harihara and Bukkaraya to establish the Vijayanagara Empire and served as mentor and guide for three generations
2. Second is regarding the establishment of 700 Hanumanji temples. It is not established by Maadhavacharya (माधवाचार्य ) but they were established by Vyasatheertha during 15th century who is a pontiff in the lineage of Madhvacharya(मध्वाचार्य ), probably 11th pontiff in the Madhvacharya's lineage. He also happens to be the Rajaguru for famous king KrishnaDevaraya of Vijayanagara Empire.
thanks for this brother , but please do not refer advait philosophy as mayavad because , because dvaitvadi ppl call advait philosophy mayavad due to their ignorance
@@rggrrggr290 I am not calling Maya Vada in a negative sense, my understanding is that Maya Vada means the principle which advocates the concept of Maya (that is Jagath Mityatva). So my intention is not to demean any Sampradaya I just used it thinking it is the old or original name.
Amazing brilliant!!!!
She's so beautiful ❤
Excellent. Thank you so much
I see some people in the comment section saying Rama was a mythological character and they are being replied that it isn't. Don't bother to counter the mythological statement, it won't change who Lord Rama was, hazaro aaye hazaro gaye lekin yeh itihaas koi nahi mita payega and some of you are calling the host woke, well it isn't her fault. You will find many people on the street who will say Ravan was great because he didn't touch Sita but they don't know the real reason. So jaane do, let it be.
Kehna zaruri hai bhai
Hum nhi kahenge to kaun kahega
@@rudra3354 har point pe woke chutiyo ko counter karna bohot zaroori hai.
This is good discussion 😊😊
Ram Setu is real Prem ki Nishani. Taj Mahal is "Ayyashi" ki Nishani. And we saw the result of that Shahajan's "Ayyashi" ki nishani in "Shaheen Baug" protest - all illegitimate descendent of Shahajan.
Thanks for showing the world the truth of Ravan, there are many foolish people who think Ravan was someone great, he was an arrogant, egoistic, super strong rapist and molester, it's the serials which have made him into a god like character
It's really wonderful
🙏🏻❤️
One cannot judge the cultural and religious practices of Ramayana age with that of 21st century situation
Laxmiji appeared on diwali in samudra manthan and vishnu-laxmi marriage was held on diwali so laxmi poojan is done.later on same day Ramji came back on same day.
Amazing 🎉
Naman hai apko
Lovely ❤
it was so good
Can you tell us the title of the movie you played scenes from during this episode? I am always floored by the level of intelligence displayed by you and your guests.
Thank you so much! 🙏🏻❤️
The footages have been sourced from the TV Series Sampurna Ramayan and Devon ke Dev Mahadev.
This is a graceful show. How appreciative, respectful and patient the host is. 🙏🏼
Great clear Information
One word response to the teaching from ramayan is dharmacharan
The host sounds like illiterate on Hindu itihas, making stupid statements. Thanks to Ami for taking all these stupid questions and explaining with best possible answer.
Sorry to say. But Shri Ram did Bharat Jodho Yatra from North to South in those days. Uniting Bharat into one big Akhand Rashtra.
Thank you for another wonderful Episode ❤
Thank you for watching! 🙏🏻❤️
@@humansofbombay2801 vese apka itna gyan lene ka koi fayda nahi hai. kyuki hame pata hai ap sab paise ke liye karte ho. kyuki ager apko gyan aur dharm ka sach main gyan hota toh apko ye pata hota ki apko apne channel per kise bulana hai aur kise nahi. maine apka channel dekha aur usmain bahut log aise the jo adharmi hai aur apke ander itni takat nahi thi ki ap unki ideology per saval kar sako. main bas itna kahunga adharm sabke liye adharm hi hota hai future main apke bacche bhi use bhugtenge kyuki apke ander adharmi ko adharmi kehne ki takat nahi hai balki ap unhe apne channel per bula ke famous kar rahe ho. ager baat dimag main ghusi ho toh thoda manthan karna ispe
Very informative😇
Good podcast, Keep it up! Humans of Bombay (mumbai). ❤😇
very nice
Such great elaborated explanation. Hope those so called leftist Feminist's learn from Shri Ramayana before talking of women empowerment.
Host looks confused😂😂😂😂😂😂
Expressionless face of host looks like a kiddo first time hearing theory of relativity😂😂😂
Make part 2 also
Which city is bombay ??
Samajh mein aata hai when one person is so passionate about a topic while the other is visibly not. It is hard to watch her sometimes. Episode made watchable only thanks to Ami ji's knowledge and charisma (pun intended). I think it came down to the limited knowledge of the host and the fact that all her questions were written down for her on her tablet. The she was reading the full question and not just looking for a keyword for a reminder of questions she actually she has.
2 things i want to add.
1..Just after slapping Manthara for her evil words on Ram, Kaikeyi started followinv her worda. Bcoz, on touching bad people their evil nature comes to us.
2nd....Lord Ram had never send his wife Mata Sita to exile. It is prakhipta.
Pranam
Om ram sri ram om
यावत् स्थास्यन्ति गिरयस्सरितश्च महीतले ।
तावद्रामायणकथा लोकेषु प्रचरिष्यति ।।1.2.36।।
As long as the mountains and rivers exist on this earth, the story of Rāmāyaṇa will prevail among the people.
Ramayana we Bharatas call Itihaas as it was! The colonialist called it mythology as they couldn’t face the truth as it’s older than abrahamic religions. ❤
👏👏👏
❤