i feel like the final ui is meant to look like a travel brochure or something. Also it does look good but i dont see how one or the other is more or less corporate?
I hate that they got rid of the rotomdex and kept the stupid, much less charismatic rotomphone. Also the fact the fearow line got cut pisses me off, i love that stupid bird.
I suppose that at first they meant for the sandwich mechanic to have an effect on the playable character itself, because there's a NPC in glaseado mountains saying how she ate spicy food to get warmer into the cold. That's the same stuff as BOTW
similar thing happened with the leaked swsh beta a few years ago--greninja and mega rayquaza were among the mons included. i can't believe people still defend dexit at this point
every switch game beta has had pokemon that wasn't in the final game. mega lucario was in the PLA beta, greninja was in SWSH beta, now nidoqueen in SV beta. it's just for testing and tragically not any indication for the final roster. that does mean that theres not much of a good reason not to include them, aside for making the game easier to balance, but even then there really is no excuse not to include them in like, DLC or updates or something. just have the limited roster in the initial release and then make all the rest of the pokemon come in the DLC. and if they're worried about competitive, just have the rules limit the roster.
@PatManDX tournaments with limited rosters would be perfectly ideal. Hell vgc always did them with regional pokedex limitations. There just isn't an excuse
They usually just put random Pokemon in for testing purposes, they probably weren't even functional or close to complete. In the XY beta's Pokemon were just 2D cutouts. In the SwSh beta Greninja was super bugged and still used the old textures and lightmaps from Sun and Moon. With every engine update they need to update quite a few other aspects before the Pokemon themselves actually function properly.
That beta menu looked really cool and fresh. I wondered why the Scarlet/Violet layout was so basic. They must've changed it because it made the game lag even more. Switch didn't do good to pokemon.
Looks really close to the original concept art. Basically GameFreak nailed down the look they had in mind but couldn’t simply optimize it for the Switch. Switch 2 games are going to be great!
I mean the main thing with pokemon sc/vi is the code and how models are loaded are behind most other games, it's the developers fault far more then the hardware.
Not Nidoqueen and FEAROW being scrapped! Like why and can we see the models in game or not??? They could have made an evolution for the poor forgotten Fearow (and one for Tropius too but that's another story). T__T They also removed many trees and part of the vegetation...
Based on the watermarks, was this build actually from April 2019? If so, that's crazy to me that they basically had the player's house up to the main city basically done well before Sword and Shield even released.
Yeah the Teraleak has revealed a bunch of stuff about release dates and it seems likely that they develop their games wayyyyy in advance. IIRC a good portion of Pokemon X was done before BW2 had released. Weird to think that gen 10 probably has a playable demo rn
As terrible as these games perform it'd be almost impossible to get them to the playable state they're at in just 3 years, makes perfect sense that they're overlapping dev cycles to get as much time as possible
lowkey the overworld looks much better than the final game, you can see that they can make a game that looks good but the hard part is optimizing it so it can run on the switch with solid fps
Guys this is running in an emulator. Without a direct comparison of SV on this guys machine, theres no point commenting on its performance. Even the most optimised games will run poorly on a low end device.
What year is this Beta phase, 2019 or another date? Still, this game was badly made from the start. It was always glitchy and it still is. Graphics are all the same in the final game as the Beta past Cabo Poco. Overall, Game Freak was terrible in making this game, and they should stop making so many projects by themselves at the same time.
Na verdade não. Há uma grande mudança no que se diz respeito aos gráficos e iluminação. Só olhar as montanhas de terra e pedra, são muito mais bonitas do que a versão final
E essa era a versão inicial. Ficaria ainda melhor, mas tiveram que gastar o tempo otimizando. Mas sim, deveriam trocar a engine, contratar mais funcionários, etc...
Hilarious that the zelda team can take 6-7 years of dev time and have a massive fucking open world map with multiple areas that load with almost no issues, yet GameFreak can't do that with their pokemon games. It's almost as if they need to take MORE THAN TWO YEARS to work on their games. Sadly they're too stupid to get out of their damn "one game every 2 years" contract.
Jokes on you but I really think that changes between this beta and final release’ performance is minor. They had 3 years and changed nothing about optimisation and that’s a shame.
actually, what fascinates me is that this was an early 2019 beta. early 2019. and it looks the same as the released product. they had time to fix everything and didn't do so much as make an attempt. can we drop the whole "it was crunched out in a year" narrative and just accept that this is a competency issue at the hands of management that don't know what the hell they're doing?
That isn't the build date, the watermark date is from the generated license file that has it set to 2019 for whatever reason. The actual build date is June 1st, 2021. Please do actual research instead of just assuming stuff and stating it as fact.
Si la switch oled corriera eso explota, ahora veo por qué bajaron mucho los gráficos, se necesita la switch 2 con potencia para tener esa calidad de juego
Não é exatamente igual. A iluminação e gráficos estão bem mais bonitos, a ui também. Só compare a textura da terra e da pedra com o que obtivemos no final
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.83[2/2] ประสบการณ์ขนหัวลุกจากตำนานวงการผี!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T_kFecQw7Ds/mqdefault.jpg)
They saw that fps in the beta and said "that looks about right to us" 💀💀💀💀
Actually, the beta already leaked. To play it, just boot up Pokemon Scarlet/Violet on your Nintendo Switch
everyone's making the same damn joke and im bored af. we need to come up with newer jokes about SV's visuals fr.
😭
@@PatManDX blame gamefreak for spending too much time coming up with ideas then scrapping it all and burning all their time being incompetent 😂
And here's the unfunny comment written by some 12y old
You're not funny shut the fuck up
The beta ui is so much better than the general corporate aesthetic we got in the final game😭
IKR
i feel like the final ui is meant to look like a travel brochure or something. Also it does look good but i dont see how one or the other is more or less corporate?
Not gonna lie pokemon beta sometimes looks better than the final game
This is because it's not running on a Nintendo Switch
They had an entirely different lighting system that they had to cut back due to performance issues 😔
@@angrychuck37 it's a different lighting actually
@@g10viwho70 no, the launch version S/V runs better when on PC
I hate that they got rid of the rotomdex and kept the stupid, much less charismatic rotomphone. Also the fact the fearow line got cut pisses me off, i love that stupid bird.
Someone woke up angry
The one and only Fearow lover
Fearow is mid like 1st and 2nd pokemon gen
here before this gets nuked
Already downloaded it, I hope Nintendo doesn't send someone after me. n
Kaboom?
I suppose that at first they meant for the sandwich mechanic to have an effect on the playable character itself, because there's a NPC in glaseado mountains saying how she ate spicy food to get warmer into the cold. That's the same stuff as BOTW
This beta UI and HG/SS beta UI
Are better than the final
Whoever makes beta UI's should be the main designer of the final games
Interesting how mudkip was just available outright in the beta. Almost like the game is just artificially missing pokemon for no good reason
similar thing happened with the leaked swsh beta a few years ago--greninja and mega rayquaza were among the mons included. i can't believe people still defend dexit at this point
every switch game beta has had pokemon that wasn't in the final game. mega lucario was in the PLA beta, greninja was in SWSH beta, now nidoqueen in SV beta. it's just for testing and tragically not any indication for the final roster. that does mean that theres not much of a good reason not to include them, aside for making the game easier to balance, but even then there really is no excuse not to include them in like, DLC or updates or something. just have the limited roster in the initial release and then make all the rest of the pokemon come in the DLC. and if they're worried about competitive, just have the rules limit the roster.
@PatManDX tournaments with limited rosters would be perfectly ideal. Hell vgc always did them with regional pokedex limitations. There just isn't an excuse
probably a placeholder
They usually just put random Pokemon in for testing purposes, they probably weren't even functional or close to complete. In the XY beta's Pokemon were just 2D cutouts. In the SwSh beta Greninja was super bugged and still used the old textures and lightmaps from Sun and Moon. With every engine update they need to update quite a few other aspects before the Pokemon themselves actually function properly.
That beta menu looked really cool and fresh. I wondered why the Scarlet/Violet layout was so basic. They must've changed it because it made the game lag even more.
Switch didn't do good to pokemon.
More like pokemon didn't do the Switch to the Switch good
I don't think that was the reason, the menus in the final game still are similar overall. I think it was just an artistic change
It's kinda sad this looks and runs nearly identical to the fully released game..
That would be because the full release runs great
@@Dznts1234What universe are you from?
It is a beta. What did you expect? If it's a prototype or an alpha, then maybe.
@@chichibooxd4793 it was made in 2019 though
@@Dznts1234what are you smoking?
Vikavolt was going to be in oh game freak you pocket robbers
Looks really close to the original concept art. Basically GameFreak nailed down the look they had in mind but couldn’t simply optimize it for the Switch. Switch 2 games are going to be great!
Thats not the switch problem thats Game Freak, just look at any nintendo game
I mean the main thing with pokemon sc/vi is the code and how models are loaded are behind most other games, it's the developers fault far more then the hardware.
Can’t wait for ps2 level graphics in Pokémon for switch 2 👍
If they're still shackled into the 3 year release cycle the next game will be equally terrible
A yes. Can't wait for gamefreak to make switch looking games run decently on the much more powerful switch 2. Truly a dream...
Not Nidoqueen and FEAROW being scrapped! Like why and can we see the models in game or not??? They could have made an evolution for the poor forgotten Fearow (and one for Tropius too but that's another story). T__T
They also removed many trees and part of the vegetation...
Based on the watermarks, was this build actually from April 2019? If so, that's crazy to me that they basically had the player's house up to the main city basically done well before Sword and Shield even released.
Yeah the Teraleak has revealed a bunch of stuff about release dates and it seems likely that they develop their games wayyyyy in advance. IIRC a good portion of Pokemon X was done before BW2 had released. Weird to think that gen 10 probably has a playable demo rn
@@avocadeousI wouldn't even be shocked if someone is drafting up ideas for Gen 11 right now lol
As terrible as these games perform it'd be almost impossible to get them to the playable state they're at in just 3 years, makes perfect sense that they're overlapping dev cycles to get as much time as possible
1:40 How dare they take all those palm trees out
That menu looks so good, it fits the game so well
lowkey the overworld looks much better than the final game, you can see that they can make a game that looks good but the hard part is optimizing it so it can run on the switch with solid fps
It's insane how polished cobo poco looks compared to even route 1.
It’s crazy how this runs better than the final version
Because its not running on a switch, the final game was always going to have scaled back visuals for performance reasons.
why does it look better than the actual game
Plot twist: the beta is the one we're playing right now.
How can this look better than the release...
i like the old ui a little better than the current
Hey you can't post game footage and call it beta leak!
Kid are you blind by any chance?
@@makinyoumad9498Kid this, kid that. Who's the one with a Pokeman pfp?
@@EikeKusch776 That's Data not a pokemon :o!
lmao
@hairlesscoconut3110 Guy had that Scarlet/Violet Water-type duck Pokemon pfp calling you a kid and ruining your joke. Deleted his post, I see.
Guys this is running in an emulator. Without a direct comparison of SV on this guys machine, theres no point commenting on its performance. Even the most optimised games will run poorly on a low end device.
Alpha and beta builds usually run at lower speeds as well (not like SV runs great at all but you get the point)
not that it matters lol, SV is bad anyway
and even the most unoptimized games will still run like ass on high end devices. it works both ways. please stop trying to justify the performance
Kind of a random place for this comment, but something that could be really cool is a well made Pokemon Indigo League game
Looks and runs the same
Crazy this was 3 years before official release. What did they do for the following 3 years fix up the houses and toss the game out?
Looks way better, and runs better, than the actual games.
Because it's running on a PC using a switch emulator
The rock texture seems to be better than the original
Nooooo The Nidoran line Got removed🥺
Curioso que usan a Lucario cómo una especie de placeholder (algunos Pokémon tenían su nombre en japonés y salía en las carátulas de varias MT)
Theres no fucking way this looks better than the final game
waiting for nintendo to show up!
Not much has changed. FPS is exactly the same
What year is this Beta phase, 2019 or another date?
Still, this game was badly made from the start. It was always glitchy and it still is. Graphics are all the same in the final game as the Beta past Cabo Poco.
Overall, Game Freak was terrible in making this game, and they should stop making so many projects by themselves at the same time.
Na verdade não. Há uma grande mudança no que se diz respeito aos gráficos e iluminação. Só olhar as montanhas de terra e pedra, são muito mais bonitas do que a versão final
E essa era a versão inicial. Ficaria ainda melhor, mas tiveram que gastar o tempo otimizando. Mas sim, deveriam trocar a engine, contratar mais funcionários, etc...
Build date is July 2021 apparently... yet this game was fucked from the start honestly.
@@P4ndaGamesBrNoCeuTemPao Well, if that's true, then i'm not surprised how they never optimized the whole region to not look like an early PS2 game.
@@neodeckard5158 it's mind boggling how underdeveloped this game truly is
Gráficos muito mais bonitos(principalmente o da terra e da pedra.
It looks as bugged as the normal game
It's a beta
@@Sobble_99 the final game looks like a beta
no way the beta game looks better
Hilarious that the zelda team can take 6-7 years of dev time and have a massive fucking open world map with multiple areas that load with almost no issues, yet GameFreak can't do that with their pokemon games. It's almost as if they need to take MORE THAN TWO YEARS to work on their games. Sadly they're too stupid to get out of their damn "one game every 2 years" contract.
Tears of the Kingdom? The game that got criticised for having the exact same map as Breath of the Wild?
@ChangedMyNameFinally69 lest you forget it has more areas as well as two other whole maps to explore, but y'know to each their own
@@Squydward Weren't those extra maps criticised for being empty? The whole game has that problem as does the previous one
because Pokemon is for shills who keep buying the same game no matter how bad it gets
@@theamazingspooderman2697 Calm down edgelord. Pokemon at its worst is still better than some of the worst games that have recently come out
Como es posible que hay pokemon en la beta que no llegaron con el juego completo, será que acaso hacen a propósito lo de no meter toda la dex
Probably I'ma look in the romfs of it I'm hoping to find the paldean garydos that got replaced by toedscool
How does the beta look so much better? Even the menu looks so clean
Menu's sure look better but I believe the colors and much more grass from what it seems definely makes it look better than the final game
Holy
What happened to the UI, everything looks so boring in the final release😭
Is the inside of Nemona's house modeled yet? I've love a quick peek in there if possible.
Where is her house?
@@Dabomb772 It's the other house in Cabo Poco, the mansion down the road.
@@Dabomb772 Yep rodrield is correct, it's the mansion down the road from the player's house
Jokes on you but I really think that changes between this beta and final release’ performance is minor. They had 3 years and changed nothing about optimisation and that’s a shame.
classic GameFreak and pokemon fans defended this by saying if the games released some months later they would be very good looking
actually, what fascinates me is that this was an early 2019 beta. early 2019. and it looks the same as the released product. they had time to fix everything and didn't do so much as make an attempt.
can we drop the whole "it was crunched out in a year" narrative and just accept that this is a competency issue at the hands of management that don't know what the hell they're doing?
Literally, it's a complete joke, they are so useless at optimisation.
That isn't the build date, the watermark date is from the generated license file that has it set to 2019 for whatever reason. The actual build date is June 1st, 2021. Please do actual research instead of just assuming stuff and stating it as fact.
@@NT_x86thank you, this comment section is driving me mental lmfao
@@NT_x86 ah okay, still no excuse tbh
@@NT_x862021 and still the game is only semi-playable, it was doomed to failure from the very beginning
Isn't this just the game on day one?
if they give legends z-a the same style as gen 9 i wont buy, IDC and if someone gotta say im exagerrating they can hop on me any time
how can u get this to boot bro i cant
NO CAMBIA NADA.JPG
beta footage? what's the difference
go into area zero lol
I was trying to. In my latest vid but then I got stuck in the floor
So this beta is from April 2019?
2021 the watermarks show the console date which is set to 2019 to let the pla builds work
@@Dabomb772 mmm okay gotcha, thanks for the clarification
This game never had a chance lmao
Esta es la beta? Pensé q el juego q tenemos todos es la beta
Si la switch oled corriera eso explota, ahora veo por qué bajaron mucho los gráficos, se necesita la switch 2 con potencia para tener esa calidad de juego
performance is still better than the actual game
It's funny how kids proceed to comment nonsense without watching the vid
What kind of nonsense bruh
kids like pokemon fans?
so its...just the same.. as the regular game
huh 🐌 this game was doomed from the start i guess
Não é exatamente igual. A iluminação e gráficos estão bem mais bonitos, a ui também. Só compare a textura da terra e da pedra com o que obtivemos no final
A vegetação também era muito mais extensa