The detective at the beginning says to Piers, let him talk and he will start to make mistakes. Piers can only allow 2-3 words out of someone before he interrupts them.
In the beginning, one detective said that if you let the man talk, he would be caught in a lie. Well, Pier made certain that didn't happen. He interrupted the guy every opportunity that he got.
I got so frustrated that I started skipping to see if it got better and then I just completely stopped it and came to the comments. What a surprise that everyone here is commenting about the same thing 😂 He’s a horrible interviewer 🤦🏻♀️
I have a little girl. She is my entire reason for living and smiling. I don't know how the parents of slain children go on. I dont know how they wake up each day and not just feel overcome with ravenous revenge that fills their broken hearts. Ugh. Seeing their pain truly hurts my heart and this has to be the most painful ordeal one could possibly endure. 💔
He is probably overweight because of the lack of physical activity and the poor quality of the food / only other items available to eat besides the prison issued meals are junk food from commissary which is essentially just gas station snacks
There are lots of false convictions, for example the "innocense project". Not saying it applies here, but Morgan just cut this too short for me to decide. Seems like a lot of circumstational. Very easy for cab driver to be in vicinity if this is his beat.
@@DownTheRabbit-Holewell, it’s a good thing his guilt was decided by a jury of people who saw every bit of evidence so our opinion one way or another doesn’t matter.
I think that was underscored by the guy at the end saying “Piers held his own,” they had to reinforce his performance. There were better ways to handle this.
A very professional person puts aside the personal feelings and makes the best of an interview, here this interviewer puts his feelings before his professionalism and that’s why he doesn’t let the man talk, i totally understand that that man doesn’t deserve anything but a professional person respects the unrespectable.
@@Gennettor-nc8kxno he's not. He already knows what the guy did so is keeping him on track. Piers knows what he's doing. If he was this awful interviewer he wouldn't have gotten as far as he has.
@@Gennettor-nc8kxIs he popular because his skills? Or is it because he was crammed down people’s throats over + over becoming a household name? The elite pick who will become famous + who will not.
Um...I think he's a good Interviewer. It's understandable that he's emotional, he's human. I imagine the questions come pooring out during interviews. I think he tries not to interrupt. Not always successful. It's not an easy job. He asks the hard hitting questions..
34:33 if he was a masterful liar he might’ve said I’m sure the witness seen and spoke to someone who was at the crime scene, but it wasn’t me. We need to find that person, he is the guilty man.
Yes Piers isn't a good interviewer at all cuz most times he loves to interrupt and at times demonize whoever he interviews. So much for all the hype about piers only to see 💩 piers mostly tried to behave smarter than who he was interviewing.
Let's be fair - he was reading his body language from the first second he walked into the room with the guy. I think he only resorted to telling him that because he'd already tried every angle but wasn't getting anything from him. I think he decided to confront him straight on and tell him exactly what he saw and what he thinks, just to see how the guy reacted to this type of questioning.
He’s wrong anyway ! Piers , you’re a shallow journalist at best and definitely not a psychologist! Crossing your arms does not necessarily indicate defense! I think this guy is INNOCENT
@@Jenlettautherapies you are right, but telling someone you think it is when they are fabricating stories, throws in self awareness which is just the journalists tool trying break the feeling of controle over the story the killer seems to have. The killer has told the lies many times and feels comfortable in teling the story convincingly but then you tell him his body language is giving him away and all of a sudden he is confused
Alex said there's a lot of worse crimes than what he was accused of and then backtracked and said there's nothing worse than killing a child and then had the nerve to bring up television
I think he phrased it poorly & meant going by (eg) something like pain. Say inmates he knows who have burned people alive, rather than the crime if that makes sense. Death rather than crime.
Another point is that he could have easily turned it around and said, "if I'm being defensive it's because I've been accused and incarcerated for a crime I haven't committed!" I do think he's guilty, though.
I'm not convinced yet, I 44:46 this to see the evidence they had but was truly disappointed!! The scolding of the kid sounded more like negligence to me, of course I don't know all of the facts and Piers made it sound like he had killed someone before!!
I have been a detective for nearly 40 years. They should have given Morgan a crash course in interview and interrogation before he interviewed this accused.
@@nitrowarrior-lj5ip - you realize detectives are just normal people who picked the field of criminal justice, right? 😂 I didn’t realize they’re not allowed on TH-cam ffs. My friends who are detectives have IG & FB like normal human beings. They just keep a private & more discreet profile.
@@therealdebbiecakesyou are responding to "nitro warrior"! 😂 Sit happy in your retirement and know that this punk won't have a career anywhere near as important as yours.
I don’t think he’s the accused after being convicted. I’m not a detective nor an attorney, at what point does the accused become the defendant and finally the convicted or condemned?
He is a stubborn arrogant narcissist who loves the sound of this own voice. He should just interview himself sitting in front of a mirror. His own opinion is the only one he’s interested in hearing 😂
Wow. Not gonna be a popular opinion because I too think the guy is very likely guilty but Piers most certainly did NOT go in there to let the guy tell his side of the story. He did his infamous interrupting and then acting like he's been totally fair with his time. I WANTED to hear what this guy had to say about the crimes and he didn't even let him finish. Cops DO get it wrong. Juries DO get it wrong. Eye witness testimonies have sometimes ended up totally OFF. 90% I think this guy did it but this interview was a sham and not at all fair. If Piers is gonna use body language as a reason to decide someone's guilt or innocence he better realize that MANY people including innocent people would hold their arms like that in a defensive or self protective manner when being questioned like this.
Yup, eye testimony’s are usual never accurate in crimes like these because our Brian’s start trying to forget about it and hearing buffet story’s and this and that starts to change what we really saw and it always starts off with just little minor details and the longer away it gets the farther from the truth it gets same way with things everyone does a few years back you might remember doing it but you don’t remember everything leading up to it
First clue that he’s guilty…… Piers: “could you ever hurt a child “? Killer: repeats the question to buy time to best compose the lie. “could I ever hurt a child?” …(huge delay) then answers “uhhhhh”. How about a lightning fast and succinct “No”. 🤷♀️
He seems to say the the thought of taking a child’s life and then almost seems to correct himself, and then said innocent child’s life, almost like he differentiates child and innocent child’s life, like in his mind there is a difference. In his sick mind he saw these girls as asking and deserving of what happened to them. IMO
@@loriclarke1142 little Dickie ☝️ thinks people need time to process whether they’d hurt a child or not. Edit: little Dickie deleted his ridiculous post. Oh well. I’m leaving mine up. 👍🏻
I dont know if he's guilty or innocent but whats the point of an interview if the person your interviewing never gets to answer any of your questions. Id liked to have heard what Alex had to say so I could form an opinion based on his answers. This was a useless interview.
From 25:51 the interview starts to make sense when this POS stops talking and the experts starts to talk. The interview with him is completely garbage I agree but what do you wanna know from a peace of trash 🗑️🗑️🗑️
He is absolutely giving automated responses. The tip off is immediate, when he repeats the question is he capable of hurting a child, he needed the time to generate the correct answer.
Right on and in turn it causes them to not want to answer his questions. He comes across arrogant as well and they can sense that and that definitely isn’t going to work for him. He needs some schooling on interviews.
@BlondeRockChick .... do you know how long piers has been doing interviews? See he already knows the guy killed these children so he's keeping him in track and not letting him get off topic
Discovered these interviews a few days ago. I’m thoroughly enjoying this channel. When Piers left the photographs on the chair, he physically turned away from them.
There is no right or wrong when it comes to grief. They are holding onto all they have left of their daughter. It brings them comfort and thats okay. Nobody should judge them for how they deal with their grief
Piers did not let him finish his sentences. And he was very hostile. This is a horrible crime and Im angry on the families behalf. All 3 were absolutely beautiful. But you have to at least let the person you want information from talk . Prayers for the families
Honestly I think that Mr. Morgan should have let him talk about evidence, talk about the details of each 'case.' Pierce constantly cuts him off..the exact opposite of what the expert told him to do which was: Let him talk. I vaguely remember this case.. . I hope, I pray the grieving families have found The Peace that passes all understanding.
But if watch it carefully he actually goes off on rants about not being allowed to give the evidence or redirects. He could have given the evidence directly. Even when drilled down by Piers to answer specific evidence questions he plays semantics, repeats the question to play for thinking time or affect confusion, or redirects. It's all smoke & mirrors & bluff. The evidence was presented in court. His lawyer challenged it. The jury weighed & made a decision on it. No system is perfect, but as stated there is far too much 'circumstantial' evidence for it to have been circumstantial.
@@Margaret-n5x Oh I don't think he's innocent by any stretch but I watched Pierce interrupting way too often. That's my take. The guy hasn't given an interview in 30 years..handed it to Pierce. Too bad...shioddy interview. IMO.
@@yanifree114 From the few examples in the program of his lies or denial about significant 'circumstantial' evidence, I don't think he would have given any real evidence anyway but would have only continued to rant & deflect. The point about the floral underwear he can't refute but he tries to with lies ('the police told me about them'). His own nephew testified in the trial Henriquez persuaded him to fake a call to the media as the 'real' murderer with a script including those details. Yes I think I would have liked Piers to have probed more for Henriquez's 'truth' but this interview was about a battle of wills & control for Henriquez.
I agree. To be honest: I hate Morgan. Interrupting others is his trademark. He NEVER lets anyone finish their sentences. No matter what the subject is, I'm always ending up frustrated that I STILL don't know what the interviewed person wanted to tell. Having said that, I DO think this inmate would have been very longwinded, given the chance. My gut says he's innocent and I still don't know what made the difference to giving him a lifesentence....there seemed to be only circumstancial evidence.
@@jeffhickman10 Not the point. The point of the interview was to hear the other guy's side, which could not happen the way Piers interrupts all the time.
It is eerie to see a man have a surface, but foundational understanding of the hurt and pain...but still be in complete and total denial about his part in it. Makes me feel really confused about my understanding of people.
You will wait a long time. This is how these peoples brains work, talking in circles, weaseling, asking the question, then boom..... they are in his control. Killers like this one will never tell the truth. They keep someone talking.
Man I'm 65. I've known some messed up people in my life. I'd like to sit and tell you all the stories. But what I can tell you I met them through life. One was a friend from the neighborhood another as a friend from school not from my hood. Others were people I met through work. I had no idea. I hung with them. I ate with them. I drank with them and I enjoyed their friendship. Two spoke with me about their charges and denied everything. What was I to believe I had no experience dealing with what they were saying. All I can say is it's true that they live amongst us. And that's a fact.
I don’t really like how this reporter is always slanted toward his interview and opinions based on states side instead of really coming in to find the truth. I know there is plenty of people behind bars that are innocent. I hope he keeps this in mind. Let alone treat all mankind with dignity no matter anyone’s sins.
No matter how they died, there is NO RECOVERY from the death of your child. I cannot imagine what it would be like if your child was killed by a heartless monster. God bless and comfort that family.
Sometimes (not every time but sometimes) people cross their arms like that for comfort. Especially rotund individuals. Its a common misconception that anyone with their arms crossed over them is in defense mode. Its not always the case. With that being said, I do believe this individual is GUILTY as can be.
Yes, agree. He's so large in the stomach area that it is comfortable for him to cross his arms and rest them on his stomach. He looked like he didn't know what to do with his short arms.
If you listen carefully, when he said "there are a lot of people in here that have done worse things" was very telling to me, he was comparing himself to other crimes. This is a narcissistic, grandiose stance IMO, very defensive. Is it circumstantial? Yes it is, but it is a tell tale from his inner thinking.
@@hp7639 occurred during the Jeffrey Epstein hay day, bought a cab medallion of the Manhattan billionaire's fixer- even speaks like the fixer. NY famous mayor was DA in So. district at time, Maxwell might not have been the only scout. This guy had a peculiar record but it really could have been just a negligent accident. He's not smooth enough to be a sociopath. Maybe he knows something about what happened but I'm not convinced he murdered them. Maybe he dropped them off at a predator's place. Why no DNA?
This guy is undoubtedly guilty, but I think Piers did a poor interview here by not allowing him to speak and just continually berating him. Not that he doesn’t deserve that, but if you’re going to interview the man, at least allow him to speak. Not for him, but for the people watching.
Undoubtedly???! 😂😂😂 You LITERALLY are not paying attention, only believing the words of people that "should" only be telling the truth. But they aren't. SMH
Nothing but sodium. All prison foods are heavy sodium based. It's meant to feed inmates on a cheap budget but it's also believed these diets are used to deteriorate inmates physically. You may think he's "eating good" but this isn't a healthy look. Nothing like being lean and in shape.
In body language analysis it's shown to be a gate and the arms and hands are the gate and it's either open or closed and when it is closed it just shows high stress or something they are uncomfortable talking about.
@@dickfitswell3437 Sometimes I cross my harms because I'm cold, other times it's because I'm bored, or my arms are tired and it makes me comfortable, body language is a pseudo science, and it's dangerous to try end guess people's intentions based on how they move an eye brow.
Absolutely! He (Piers) was just there to accuse him and not to find out anything, even crossing his arms made him guilty in Pier's eyes when anyone that heavy needs to rest their arms on something!!
I am so sorry for the poor families who lost their babies to this maniac. I can't imagine the pain and hate you must all feel for him. I will keep you all in my thoughts and prayers forever.
Piers, as usual, enters the interview with a pre-conceived bias. He continously interrupts his guest until time runs out, and we are left with more questions than answers. The same strategy that he used with Mo Hijab, Bassem Youssef, and others.
Yea Piers is a horrible, arrogant, extremely bias. And I just can tell he treats people “beneath” him in professional and personal setting like peasants! And his interview skills are embarrassingly bad!
*_Yeah I said the same!! I wish it was anyone but Pierce who did the interview.. He said all he wanted to do was to break Alex H. & when he couldn’t he lost patience & got mad himself, you could so tell at the end lol.._* *_I wish it was Soledad O’Brien who did the interview!! She’s way better at interviewing serial killers.._*
He's not qualified to interview serial killers. He doesn't know how to read body language. He doesn't understand the psychopathy he's dealing with. He talks too much.
There are no ways to describe what an awful interview this was. He didn't let the man speak at all. Thumbs down. I don't know what I believe because Morgan wouldn't shut up long enough to let him talk
Yup. This one I think could be innocent. If the evidence wasn't thrown away, let's do DNA tests. Wanna' bet that stuff was tossed? Once DNA testing was common, I'll get the detectives "lost" it.
The only truth that I heard him say that rolled of his tongue was there are people in here for worse crimes. I would truly like to know what is worse than killing a child in a psychopaths mind.
@@ThanaBrunges-mx7ji Did you notice when he stood up after Henriquez had left he seemed to sigh deeply, maybe relax his shoulders? Must have been a REALLY stressful interview.
I have been following you Pierce doing these interviews. It takes a special person to do something like this. You are doing an exceptional job. Just getting close to do an interview…scary enough as it is….is not an easy task. I hope this does not end up giving you nightmares as I can only listen to one here and there….don’t let the evil get to you and thank you for giving the ordinary folks a deeper look into the minds of these people.
Plus, crossing his arms isn’t aggressive, it’s more of a guarded, closing yourself off, or comforting yourself gesture. Hands balled up in a fist and arms stretched out would be more of an aggressive, ready to fight stance.
Spot on observation! Sometimes a dog is a dog! The man cannot be comfortable in that tiny chair. I read a body language expert who said they always try to put the “person” in a physically uncomfortable interview position. They even talk about manipulating the temperature. The physical discomfort contributes to them making a mistake. You are sooo correct..
I would have liked to hear the guy speak more. We watch these as a sort of character study, so listening. To their thought process is imperative to this.
The problem is every time he buts in to give his evidence that he is innocent he either goes on a rant about how no one ever lets him give his evidence, or he goes off on another tangent deflecting from the question/ issues being discussed. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. He had a whole trial that was about evidence & his rebuttals/ 'evidence'/excuses
@@Margaret-n5x He interrupted him constantly. The guy asked at the end if he could explain and Piers said the interview was over. I like Piers but this was terribly biased and not a truly journalistic interview.
@@DarlaAnne I agree that Piers seems to cut him off a lot, but I also suspect that the show is heavily edited because Henriquez says very little of substance & rants/ rambles/ deflects constantly. It is also about control. Henriquez is trying to control the situation with protestations of innocence, corruption, everybody else is lying etc, classic control technique of narcissists/ sociopaths. Piers is trying to take control from him by shutting him down. It doesn't make for the best tv, but all the arguments & evidence of a 6 week trial won't fit into a 50 minute show that includes discussions with other people. I think the program mainly focuses on revealing his arrogant non-empathetic narcissistic personality & delusions, & highlights some particular lies & gaslighting.
@@Margaret-n5x I understand that. I started out watching this very much not liking the guy but it was still a fail on the part of Piers to not let him finish his sentences for whatever parts were kept in the interview. It left a lot of us wondering and kinda backfired as now I'm seeing quite a few comments wondering about his guilt. This guy can be a total narcissist and yet not be guilty of the crimes. There's no physical evidence, only circumstantial which is pretty insane for a death penalty conviction. I really wanted to hear what he had to say. This was definitely a "get him" interview than anything exploring all of the aspects of the case.
The interviews are the best. Rather just a doc series. Interviews are fascinating because for normal people we dont have that type of mindset. I have study a bit of psychology for nursing in college and i always wondered what turns people to do crazy stuff. Its interesting to just sorta understand why people do it. Not that any of this is okay and its horrible but interesting of the mind. Is it from childhood is it a mental illness you know. The mind is super fascinating and complex. How we store memories or how we learn.
@lemongate4869 Not always!, an intelligent criminal may very well cease all his activities at the moment of someone's arrest to reinforce the idea that the killer has been caught.
@@nomarussia5085 You're so right.... he seems so insured and he tries to make up for his insecurity by interrupting those who he interviews and cutting them off and when ever they say stop doing that he doubles down on it with further interruptions!
It's not a lie detector. It's measuring sweat, heart rate and breathing variations which will show when the person is stressed. They use another type of test for male predators that involves a device placed around the males p€n1s and detects movements when the predator is shown images at random and then a random child is shown and if the pred is attracted to her/him then his member will move. The better test is a voice stress analysis.
And for those who say lie detector tests or polygraphs are NOT allowed during a trial, are wrong, they can be admitted if both sides agree. That's how we know they work. If they didn't they wouldn't let them at all
With all due respect the comment is no more gullible than yours. You can't make up your mind from a Piers Morgan interview, by his own admission Piers only cares about the dead girls, when a journalists job is to be impartial and to gather facts on both sides. Like many on here, I'm not saying he isn't lying, but for me there isn't enough evidence and I would also like to know about DNA
This guy has been convicted, he may have been just really lucky, or really smart! If u study any other serial killers they usually are very bright,until they get caught!!
@maher.itorer I'm genuinely conflicted..He looks like a trademark narcissist, but in the same token there isn't much physical evidence to tie him to many of the cases. Having said that I think he's guilty as sin
@@frankiephenomanalI gotta disagree. it's because of cases like this that "circumstantial evidence" is a thing. with regard to circumstance, this case literally checks every box - and pierce allowed us all to see for certain how much of a liar henriquez truly is when faced with these "coincidences".
@@wallach-correllebeing accused of M*rder is a huge deal. It’s another life on the line. There should be hard evidence not circumstantial. Just my opinion. I too am conflicted, I’m not sure either way
he did talk. He says the police are liars and blames everyone for being wrong. Like a flat-earther who says all the scientists worldwide, and gov are all cooking up a big lie. If you let them get power in the conversation they will go on for hours and lay blame. There was a witness who saw him by his car where one of the body's was found who picked him out of a line up of men. He said he could never hurt a child but was convicted of scalding a little innocent boy's whole back from top to bottom while in his care prior.
Y’all do know the police lie all the time in Baltimore there is a police unit in prison for framing people search it not saying he innocent but police do lie n play mind games they just be wanting a conviction
I've seen SO many interviews killers have a bad arrogance and persona about them that they just CANT hide! This guy's I believe is innocent! He was the perfect convenient person in the 'neighbourhood' but killers don't dump bodies close to home!! Cops were SO PRESSURED due to this case and horrendous for corruption back in the Bronx in those days. All will be brought to light some day. God Knows 😊❤
We cannot rely on what we perceive of other people. This man seems to be in prison just because of what people think. The absolute truth is they have no strong evidence. Everyone just talking based on emotions. He could be the killer, but we need strong evidence to be sure
I DO NOT FIND THIS INTERVIEW COMFORTABLE TO WATCH. A lot of innocent people have been sent to prison. This man could be guilty or innocent, but it was not proven that he is guilty. I wonder how anyone feels comfortable listening to those detectives telling us what to think. They were under pressure to convict someone and this looks like terrible job from the police. Rhey should have done better.
That's exactly what I was thinking. Back then even if foreign fluids, hair etc was found on a body there was no DNA testing but many crimes have been solved since thanks to stored items and DNA testing
I Think At The 7 Minute Mark Of The Interview. He Said There's A Lot Of Worse Crimes Than This. Then He Back Tracked And Said It's The Worse Crime. INTERESTING
After 40 years, I still find it hard to listen to law enforcement experts. What the public fails to recognize, the motivation to solve any crime, is very high by any means. The families dealing with these tragedies, my heart goes out too. Cab drivers like police part of the landscape. With so many coincidences, it's hard to look elsewhere. Hopefully, they have the right guy.
And thats why a jury of our peers make the final call. Not just Law Enforcement. If Law Enforcement was the absolute decision maker, then I think we would be in trouble. With that said, the justice system isnt always perfect. The jury system is so important.
Juries consist of lay people, who can be easily manipulated by both lawyers and prosecutors. Or have prejudices and biases of their own. Better would be a team of judges, who actually studied law. Those judges are checked by an independend group with judical knowledge, to see if they stick to procedure, handled evidence the right way and are unbiased towards the case to start with. Judical trials always reminds me of drama series, but I guess it makes for good television.
![ปฏิเสธไม่ไหว (Crush on you) - LIPTA feat. No One Else [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NBw1jF342vw/mqdefault.jpg)
The detective at the beginning says to Piers, let him talk and he will start to make mistakes. Piers can only allow 2-3 words out of someone before he interrupts them.
Hahaha so so true
Typical Piers, he knows it all so much better.
Piers is what you call A Stuffed Shirt!
😂😂
EXACTLY! 💯
I felt uncomfortable as soon as he said, “There are worse crimes than that”.
He is sick
The response of what’s worse than killing a child?????
@@clementmahumane65 yes he is and evil too
Haha you said it !
He says
Just because she was found in my pants does that mean I killed her ?
Holy smokin Joe !!!
This is my red flag to know
In California he would be in protective custody.
In the beginning, one detective said that if you let the man talk, he would be caught in a lie. Well, Pier made certain that didn't happen. He interrupted the guy every opportunity that he got.
Exactly my thought!
He always does
I got so frustrated that I started skipping to see if it got better and then I just completely stopped it and came to the comments.
What a surprise that everyone here is commenting about the same thing 😂
He’s a horrible interviewer 🤦🏻♀️
Honestly, I think P.M. just displayed his own Narcissism.
@@doracampos2088YES!
A serial interrupter interviewing a serial killer.
😂
Hahaha.....😂
@usmaansial idiot...He's Not interrupting. He's Asking Vital Questions before He loses his thoughts and Forgets them!
Ego trip all the way! 😜😜😜
hahaha so funny
Piers, if this message gets to you at all, STOP INTERRUPTING! We want to hear his answers, but you don’t let people finish what they’re saying.
Pigs will fly…
Why??? All the answers are lies, what’s the point? He’s never going to admit his wrongdoings, so it’s pointless
@@cindybrock1705 Then what's really pointless is the interview.
Aww
Are
Ima psychopath you got
Triggered? Pierce didn’t respect him why shouldn’t he not interrupt the sick f k
@@PatriciaALoModerno💯
A skilled interviewer knows how to put his ego aside, step out of the way, and let a person being interviewed reveal himself.
This dude got married in prison, why would someone marry someone in jail?🤷🏻
@@DEPORTER_SUPPORTER Conjugal visits?
@@DEPORTER_SUPPORTER Desperate
And thats not Piers
@@Somi-dp7eg😂👍
I have a little girl. She is my entire reason for living and smiling. I don't know how the parents of slain children go on. I dont know how they wake up each day and not just feel overcome with ravenous revenge that fills their broken hearts. Ugh. Seeing their pain truly hurts my heart and this has to be the most painful ordeal one could possibly endure. 💔
You need Jesus.
@@ItIsAllgood1219. Thank you for this comment
Truth becomes very clear in Jesus name amen ❤
@@ItIsAllgood1219 You need an adjustment in your consciousness.
@@ItIsAllgood1219Jesus is THE answer but your comment is very dismissive of the real need for justice!!!!
They don’t go on. They live in constant Hurt, Rage, Anger and despair
He definitely ain’t missing any meals in prison.😮
He is probably overweight because of the lack of physical activity and the poor quality of the food / only other items available to eat besides the prison issued meals are junk food from commissary which is essentially just gas station snacks
I would bet prison food is cheap and unhealthy
Too many carbs and calories and too little variety and flavor in prison food so inmates buy the commissary junk food.
Prison food is gross, most likely getting a lot of commissary junk food. Like sausages, ramen noodles, fattening snacks
I do'nt see how this aspect of the man has anything to do with the subject of the interview.
1989 kids used to live outside, in those days your entire neighborhood was your playground..
Exactly and boy oh boy what a time it was to be alive as a KID back then. I was 11 or 12 yo in 1989😊
Yes
I was ten in 1989.. freest I’ve ever been.. and everyone was ok
@@Shade_razor-79 that part🤞🏽💜💯
Stay outside until the night lights come on
Telling Piers to let someone talk is like telling a baby not to cry
😂 legendary comment 😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
It’s Piers job not to let him get away with his lies!
His Mother never asked him because she didn’t want to know the truth!
@@jenniferrieger How do you do that if you dont let the guy talk enough to create enough lies
Piers is out of his depth interviewing these people. Completely under qualified
There are lots of false convictions, for example the "innocense project". Not saying it applies here, but Morgan just cut this too short for me to decide. Seems like a lot of circumstational. Very easy for cab driver to be in vicinity if this is his beat.
He isn't a good listener
@@DownTheRabbit-Holewell, it’s a good thing his guilt was decided by a jury of people who saw every bit of evidence so our opinion one way or another doesn’t matter.
Thank you, my exact thoughts. It was a lame performance and unconvincing too.
I think that was underscored by the guy at the end saying “Piers held his own,” they had to reinforce his performance. There were better ways to handle this.
A very professional person puts aside the personal feelings and makes the best of an interview, here this interviewer puts his feelings before his professionalism and that’s why he doesn’t let the man talk, i totally understand that that man doesn’t deserve anything but a professional person respects the unrespectable.
Terrible interview. The detective told Morgan to let him talk to allow him to make mistakes. The guy couldn’t even complete a sentence.
Morgan is lousy at this.
@@petesaria-hf1xhMorgan get emotional of this criminals,that's way....
Morgan, apart from being highly unsympathetic, is a very poor interviewer. It's incomprehensible why he is so popular in the UK....
@@Gennettor-nc8kxno he's not. He already knows what the guy did so is keeping him on track.
Piers knows what he's doing. If he was this awful interviewer he wouldn't have gotten as far as he has.
@@Gennettor-nc8kxIs he popular because his skills? Or is it because he was crammed down people’s throats over + over becoming a household name? The elite pick who will become famous + who will not.
Piers like to talk over people I don't enjoy his interviews, I wish he can give people time to explain when he ask questions...
He does it on all his interviews...he is not at all a good interviewer ....too emotional
Yet here you are
Um...I think he's a good Interviewer. It's understandable that he's emotional, he's human. I imagine the questions come pooring out during interviews. I think he tries not to interrupt. Not always successful. It's not an easy job. He asks the hard hitting questions..
34:33 if he was a masterful liar he might’ve said I’m sure the witness seen and spoke to someone who was at the crime scene, but it wasn’t me. We need to find that person, he is the guilty man.
Yes Piers isn't a good interviewer at all cuz most times he loves to interrupt and at times demonize whoever he interviews. So much for all the hype about piers only to see 💩 piers mostly tried to behave smarter than who he was interviewing.
RIP Victims. God help their families.
Piers you’re not supposed to tell the person you’re reading their body language 😂
Let's be fair - he was reading his body language from the first second he walked into the room with the guy. I think he only resorted to telling him that because he'd already tried every angle but wasn't getting anything from him. I think he decided to confront him straight on and tell him exactly what he saw and what he thinks, just to see how the guy reacted to this type of questioning.
He’s wrong anyway ! Piers , you’re a shallow journalist at best and definitely not a psychologist! Crossing your arms does not necessarily indicate defense! I think this guy is INNOCENT
Crossing arms is a form of self soothing. Its not an unconscious form of denial or defence.
@@Jenlettautherapies you are right, but telling someone you think it is when they are fabricating stories, throws in self awareness which is just the journalists tool trying break the feeling of controle over the story the killer seems to have. The killer has told the lies many times and feels comfortable in teling the story convincingly but then you tell him his body language is giving him away and all of a sudden he is confused
@@Jenlettautherapies Taken in by the acting were you? Facts don't lie.
Alex said there's a lot of worse crimes than what he was accused of and then backtracked and said there's nothing worse than killing a child and then had the nerve to bring up television
Hah! I just wrote the exact same comment, then saw yours. Yeah, the guy is a psychopath, there's is no remorse from him for what he did.
Hah! I just wrote the exact same comment, then saw yours. Yeah, the guy is a psychopath, there's is no remorse from him for what he did.
I think he phrased it poorly & meant going by (eg) something like pain. Say inmates he knows who have burned people alive, rather than the crime if that makes sense. Death rather than crime.
@@CC_Babblecockexactly. People over analyze so much
If crossing arms means one is defensive then I have been guilty of anything and everything for all my life.
Another point is that he could have easily turned it around and said, "if I'm being defensive it's because I've been accused and incarcerated for a crime I haven't committed!" I do think he's guilty, though.
Its much more to it then that
I'm not convinced yet, I 44:46 this to see the evidence they had but was truly disappointed!! The scolding of the kid sounded more like negligence to me, of course I don't know all of the facts and Piers made it sound like he had killed someone before!!
And you have
@@isonlyme1957
It wasn’t SCOLDING.
It was SCALDING.
He didn’t yell at him.
He seriously burned him with hot water.
I'm from Africa and what sickens me more is the fact that these serial killers are over fed like that after such crimes😢
They could feed half of Africa with the food they're giving them in prison.
Being overweight doesn’t mean you eat expensive high quality food.
You not From African, if you are even no need to mention,
@@DEPORTER_SUPPORTERprisoners still have to pay for it.
I just commented along same lines. Coincidentally I am from South Africa.
I have been a detective for nearly 40 years. They should have given Morgan a crash course in interview and interrogation before he interviewed this accused.
Sure you are mr detective 😂
@@nitrowarrior-lj5ip - you realize detectives are just normal people who picked the field of criminal justice, right? 😂 I didn’t realize they’re not allowed on TH-cam ffs. My friends who are detectives have IG & FB like normal human beings. They just keep a private & more discreet profile.
@@therealdebbiecakesyou are responding to "nitro warrior"! 😂 Sit happy in your retirement and know that this punk won't have a career anywhere near as important as yours.
I don’t think he’s the accused after being convicted. I’m not a detective nor an attorney, at what point does the accused become the defendant and finally the convicted or condemned?
Wow. Once again Piers Morgan shows how completely inept he is at conducting a meaningful interview. It’s pathetic.
interrupts with his trade mark "yeah but hang on"
Very unskillfull indeed 🙆
He is a stubborn arrogant narcissist who loves the sound of this own voice. He should just interview himself sitting in front of a mirror. His own opinion is the only one he’s interested in hearing 😂
*surprise!*
Tbh when people try to interrupt me like that, I just talk over them in a loud, obnoxious tone.
Psychopaths never admit their crimes.. No truth. . No remorse.. No conscience.. No soul..
Well, some do.
most criminals never admit to anything
Has PM ever admitted to being wrong? Just saying.
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Nope because they always think they have a chance to get out. I wouldn't either.
Wow. Not gonna be a popular opinion because I too think the guy is very likely guilty but Piers most certainly did NOT go in there to let the guy tell his side of the story. He did his infamous interrupting and then acting like he's been totally fair with his time. I WANTED to hear what this guy had to say about the crimes and he didn't even let him finish. Cops DO get it wrong. Juries DO get it wrong. Eye witness testimonies have sometimes ended up totally OFF. 90% I think this guy did it but this interview was a sham and not at all fair.
If Piers is gonna use body language as a reason to decide someone's guilt or innocence he better realize that MANY people including innocent people would hold their arms like that in a defensive or self protective manner when being questioned like this.
I agree.
I feel they need to retrial this case with more solid proof of evidence
Trump does it all the time.
The "body language" BS is just more evidence that people are sheeple and trendy.
Yup, eye testimony’s are usual never accurate in crimes like these because our Brian’s start trying to forget about it and hearing buffet story’s and this and that starts to change what we really saw and it always starts off with just little minor details and the longer away it gets the farther from the truth it gets same way with things everyone does a few years back you might remember doing it but you don’t remember everything leading up to it
“I haven’t committed any murders and I don’t *think* I will” said enough for me
Another red flag…..I’d NEVER say “I don’t think”. I’d say fking I’d NEVER !!!
Never say never - Justin Bieber
He's obviously innocent he even says it 🤷
@hollydavis2261 even if someone killed your loved one? or was in the process?
Yup that was telling
Piers is great at interrupting people
Top notch, his poor wife probably doesn’t get a word in edgewise.
Yes I'm learning this
@@yolandascholten2012
@@yolandascholten2012
First clue that he’s guilty……
Piers: “could you ever hurt a child “?
Killer: repeats the question to buy time to best compose the lie. “could I ever hurt a child?” …(huge delay) then answers “uhhhhh”.
How about a lightning fast and succinct “No”. 🤷♀️
He seems to say the the thought of taking a child’s life and then almost seems to correct himself, and then said innocent child’s life, almost like he differentiates child and innocent child’s life, like in his mind there is a difference. In his sick mind he saw these girls as asking and deserving of what happened to them. IMO
Repeating questions is def a stress defense used to think about the response. I'd love to watch his police interrogations.
@@dickfitswell3437 you don’t need to think about whether you’d hurt a child or not. 🥴
@@dickfitswell3437 you don’t need time to think about whether you’d hurt a child. 🙄
@@loriclarke1142 little Dickie ☝️ thinks people need time to process whether they’d hurt a child or not. Edit: little Dickie deleted his ridiculous post. Oh well. I’m leaving mine up. 👍🏻
This guy thinks he can admit to other horrible things he has done with the hope that we think he is an honest man.
As do many.
after arrest killings stop
Doing an Alex Murdagh
Years of study & observations. Yes they do
Project and deflect.
They’re great at this
Yup, trying to minimize how dangerous he is.
They didn't "catch" the Unabomber. His brother turned him in in exchange for them not seeking the death penalty.
Ted kazienski was right about technology ruining the world. He just went about it the wrong way
@@randalwright3129 💯
I dont know if he's guilty or innocent but whats the point of an interview if the person your interviewing never gets to answer any of your questions. Id liked to have heard what Alex had to say so I could form an opinion based on his answers. This was a useless interview.
Fully agree. Worthless.
That's how Morgan is. He's a sensationalist and doesn't care about substance. He's useless as a "journalist".
From 25:51 the interview starts to make sense when this POS stops talking and the experts starts to talk. The interview with him is completely garbage I agree but what do you wanna know from a peace of trash 🗑️🗑️🗑️
Piers loves to hear himself talk
I was just watching and then went looking to see if anyone else noticed, and you did. Piers wouldn't let him speak.
He is absolutely giving automated responses. The tip off is immediate, when he repeats the question is he capable of hurting a child, he needed the time to generate the correct answer.
@SurfinLifeCaliGurl No, he thought it could be a trap. He was convicted of leaving his step son alone to burn himself.
I think he paused because of the charges he had on his stepson
He wasn’t asking open- ended questions to get the guy to talk about himself and reveal his character. He showed bias from the outset.
Very biased, like he was dead set on calling him a liar no matter what!
Right on and in turn it causes them to not want to answer his questions. He comes across arrogant as well and they can sense that and that definitely isn’t going to work for him. He needs some schooling on interviews.
@@BlondeRockChick Absolutely! Totally right
@BlondeRockChick .... do you know how long piers has been doing interviews?
See he already knows the guy killed these children so he's keeping him in track and not letting him get off topic
@@harleyhendrix8467 well by the way he interviews someone , I’d say not long! If he has been doing this a long time , I’d be embarrassed!
Piers, I love how you handled Lisa's family members, so sincere and kind. God bless you and those families that are suffering. 🙏❤️
Discovered these interviews a few days ago. I’m thoroughly enjoying this channel.
When Piers left the photographs on the chair, he physically turned away from them.
I agree! Just left a similar comment.. 👍
Nice catch. He didnt want to face them. Quite litteraly.
Me too.
Me too
Me too
I want to interview Pierse Morgan for being the most prolific interrupter
If you could get a word in edgewise.
🤣🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀
If I could give this comment an award 🥇
If you could ask.
Haha
It's SCALDED. Scolding is when you speak to someone angrily because you disapprove of their behavior. Scalding is being burned.
thank you for that. It did confuse me when I heard it
Scaulded with boiling hot liquid, not scolded meaning they were yelled at.
Thank you for clarifying. I didn't get that either.
@@lisamercando4312 It is scalded. Unless you're a Scot scauld doesn't exist.
When he said scolding, I thought it was a polite way of saying abusing.
He will never uncover anything, because he interrupts everyone, deciding beforehand what they are going to say. Reacting before getting a full answer.
Piers didn't do a good interview...he tried to solve nothing....no truth came out..
That was not the purpose of the Piers interview. Getting information out of the murderer was the function of the Police and Courts !!!!!
I was thinking the man was innocent until the later part of the interview.
I don't think any truth would have come out either way. The man told himself the same lie for 30 years to the point where he fully believes it.
Too much in his work mind
True ...he would have just let the guy bubble out his way into mistakes that the detectives adviced him on the onset
Heartbreaking to see these parents have these untouched rooms decades later
it's called stuck in time. they haven't let go.
Also intense denial. The landlady saw Lisa hanging out with the guy.
There is no right or wrong when it comes to grief. They are holding onto all they have left of their daughter. It brings them comfort and thats okay. Nobody should judge them for how they deal with their grief
Piers did not let him finish his sentences. And he was very hostile. This is a horrible crime and Im angry on the families behalf. All 3 were absolutely beautiful. But you have to at least let the person you want information from talk . Prayers for the families
My heart breaks for these families..
Let the man speak! Piers wont stop interrupting.
That's nothing new. Which is why I get so frustrated watching his interviews.
yeah i cant get a read on this guy
I cannot imagine why anyone thought Piers should be an interviewer. He cannot stand to have anyone talking but himself.
I don’t trust a word out of Alex’s mouth. He gave himself up when he Describe that little girl’s underwear which ONLY the killer would have known.
Detectives say let him talk….he’ll mess up. Pierce interrupts this guy constantly.
The killers talk 8x as much as pier Morgan. Word for word. Stop
@@grose93alexander67 Not this one
@@grose93alexander67 lol did you watch the same video? He CONSTANTLY interrupted this guy.
@@jtphenom0811Sure did and theirs a lot of holes in this case is all I'm saying
That’s also a tactic regarding challenging the person who always wants to be in control.
Piers blew this interview by letting this killer outsmart him. He was told to let this killer talk, talk, talk, but Piers wasn’t having it.
Losing a sibling changes your life 4 ever!
Honestly I think that Mr. Morgan should have let him talk about evidence, talk about the details of each 'case.' Pierce constantly cuts him off..the exact opposite of what the expert told him to do which was: Let him talk. I vaguely remember this case.. . I hope, I pray the grieving families have found The Peace that passes all understanding.
But if watch it carefully he actually goes off on rants about not being allowed to give the evidence or redirects. He could have given the evidence directly. Even when drilled down by Piers to answer specific evidence questions he plays semantics, repeats the question to play for thinking time or affect confusion, or redirects. It's all smoke & mirrors & bluff. The evidence was presented in court. His lawyer challenged it. The jury weighed & made a decision on it. No system is perfect, but as stated there is far too much 'circumstantial' evidence for it to have been circumstantial.
@@Margaret-n5x Oh I don't think he's innocent by any stretch but I watched Pierce interrupting way too often. That's my take. The guy hasn't given an interview in 30 years..handed it to Pierce. Too bad...shioddy interview. IMO.
@@yanifree114 From the few examples in the program of his lies or denial about significant 'circumstantial' evidence, I don't think he would have given any real evidence anyway but would have only continued to rant & deflect. The point about the floral underwear he can't refute but he tries to with lies ('the police told me about them'). His own nephew testified in the trial Henriquez persuaded him to fake a call to the media as the 'real' murderer with a script including those details. Yes I think I would have liked Piers to have probed more for Henriquez's 'truth' but this interview was about a battle of wills & control for Henriquez.
Pierce allways cuts people off when he disagrees with them.
That's why i don't like watching his shows.
@solasunny8965 true that, piers has never been neutral, he takes one side of every interview or story he presents
He told the authorities about the flowered underwear before they knew what they looked like and he still tries to deny it.
Dangerous, and sick.
If u beleive cops dont lie to get a conviction if they think the purp guilty
@@treefrog123astop it
@@treefrog123abye this is not crooked confessions. Did you not watch the video.
@@treefrog123aYou seem unable to clearly express your thoughts in written English.😮
Yup that is sooooo sick
We will never get his side of the story if Piers does not stop interrupting him!!
He cant stop obviously. He came to hear what he wants to hear. Insane!
I agree. To be honest: I hate Morgan. Interrupting others is his trademark. He NEVER lets anyone finish their sentences. No matter what the subject is, I'm always ending up frustrated that I STILL don't know what the interviewed person wanted to tell.
Having said that, I DO think this inmate would have been very longwinded, given the chance.
My gut says he's innocent and I still don't know what made the difference to giving him a lifesentence....there seemed to be only circumstancial evidence.
So, you people really think this guy has a reasonable, articulate and believable side? Really?
@@jeffhickman10 Not the point. The point of the interview was to hear the other guy's side, which could not happen the way Piers interrupts all the time.
@@fringeminoritymember Agreed!!!
It is eerie to see a man have a surface, but foundational understanding of the hurt and pain...but still be in complete and total denial about his part in it. Makes me feel really confused about my understanding of people.
I was really hoping to hear more from the man convicted especially after the detective said the more you let him the more he reveals himself!
Exactly he was not given a chance to talk, he was to heavy an uncomfortable and was blamed for even crossing his arms at times but not all the time!
You will wait a long time. This is how these peoples brains work, talking in circles, weaseling, asking the question, then boom..... they are in his control. Killers like this one will never tell the truth. They keep someone talking.
The only time I've ever seen a psychopath and a narcissist during an interview
😂😂😂which was which
@@dirkjensen969 > a very good question!
Hahaha😂
😂😂😂😂
Man I'm 65. I've known some messed up people in my life. I'd like to sit and tell you all the stories. But what I can tell you I met them through life. One was a friend from the neighborhood another as a friend from school not from my hood. Others were people I met through work. I had no idea. I hung with them. I ate with them. I drank with them and I enjoyed their friendship. Two spoke with me about their charges and denied everything. What was I to believe I had no experience dealing with what they were saying. All I can say is it's true that they live amongst us. And that's a fact.
I don’t really like how this reporter is always slanted toward his interview and opinions based on states side instead of really coming in to find the truth. I know there is plenty of people behind bars that are innocent. I hope he keeps this in mind. Let alone treat all mankind with dignity no matter anyone’s sins.
The man answers the questions, sounds sincere, the police pick apart every answer with a text book analyst, it makes me wonder, what if they're wrong?
No matter how they died, there is NO RECOVERY from the death of your
child. I cannot imagine what it would be like if your child was killed by a heartless monster. God bless and comfort that family.
Do you think this guy is possibly innocent?
@@richardlawson6787I don't think he's innocent, but he'll be judged in the end.
Sometimes (not every time but sometimes) people cross their arms like that for comfort. Especially rotund individuals. Its a common misconception that anyone with their arms crossed over them is in defense mode. Its not always the case.
With that being said, I do believe this individual is GUILTY as can be.
Yes, agree. He's so large in the stomach area that it is comfortable for him to cross his arms and rest them on his stomach. He looked like he didn't know what to do with his short arms.
He wrapped those arms around kids. And killed them..
This had the potential to be a much better interview. I do think he’s guilty, but I want to hear more of his side as well.
Rip to these girls🕊️
His opening speech describes himself, and his words give him away.
If you listen carefully, when he said "there are a lot of people in here that have done worse things" was very telling to me, he was comparing himself to other crimes.
This is a narcissistic, grandiose stance IMO, very defensive.
Is it circumstantial? Yes it is, but it is a tell tale from his inner thinking.
@SimonWorlds he was just saying he is not even the worse in there of what he is accused of. No dna on a single victim? How is that possible?
@@hp7639 occurred during the Jeffrey Epstein hay day, bought a cab medallion of the Manhattan billionaire's fixer- even speaks like the fixer. NY famous mayor was DA in So. district at time, Maxwell might not have been the only scout. This guy had a peculiar record but it really could have been just a negligent accident. He's not smooth enough to be a sociopath. Maybe he knows something about what happened but I'm not convinced he murdered them. Maybe he dropped them off at a predator's place. Why no DNA?
@@hp7639 I totally agree with you.
An INNOCENT MAN will NOT stay quiet for 30 years! 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
You are right. They'd be trying to plead their case any chance they got. Begging to plead their case, even.
Yeah it doesn't make any sense for him to hide this exculpatory evidence for decades.
Excellent point!
You could be wrong. Only God knows the truth! Perhaps he didn’t do it. We don’t know the truth 😢
@@sickens-mewrong only and idiot does an interview. They just mislead public to believe corrupt police story
This guy is undoubtedly guilty, but I think Piers did a poor interview here by not allowing him to speak and just continually berating him. Not that he doesn’t deserve that, but if you’re going to interview the man, at least allow him to speak. Not for him, but for the people watching.
Why do you think he’s guilty? I don’t think he’s guilty.
Undoubtedly???! 😂😂😂 You LITERALLY are not paying attention, only believing the words of people that "should" only be telling the truth. But they aren't. SMH
Piers is a horrible host😂
@@ronaldleskojr5579its possible, the nypd are known to set people up.
Thank You!!!
The “this here” was very compelling evidence. His anger when talking about his wife’s pink sweat pants,is so upsetting.
Because that’s what got him caught
What exactly is our prison system feeding these inmates?
Lots of top ramen and other cheap processed foods. If you eat garbage every day and don't work out, you become obese very easily
Nothing but sodium. All prison foods are heavy sodium based. It's meant to feed inmates on a cheap budget but it's also believed these diets are used to deteriorate inmates physically. You may think he's "eating good" but this isn't a healthy look. Nothing like being lean and in shape.
Commissary is all junk food plus they are locked in a cell
he's clearly been well fed, yet homeless veterans are starving on the corner cold and wet every night
A normal American diet, by the looks of it.
"You're crossing your arms", seriously Piers? And what does that prove?
Right 😂😂and look how little that chair is smh
In body language analysis it's shown to be a gate and the arms and hands are the gate and it's either open or closed and when it is closed it just shows high stress or something they are uncomfortable talking about.
@@dickfitswell3437
Sometimes I cross my harms because I'm cold, other times it's because I'm bored, or my arms are tired and it makes me comfortable, body language is a pseudo science, and it's dangerous to try end guess people's intentions based on how they move an eye brow.
Unreliable PHD forensic nonsense.
Exactly, I thought I was trippin 😂😂
In the end, he is right that you never gave him a chance to explain. So sad.
Exactly soon has he tried he shut him down
All got tunnel vision
I reckon this man maybe innocent but very unlucky
Bad journalism
I don't like piers interviews
Absolutely! He (Piers) was just there to accuse him and not to find out anything, even crossing his arms made him guilty in Pier's eyes when anyone that heavy needs to rest their arms on something!!
Piers is an expert….LOL
I am so sorry for the poor families who lost their babies to this maniac. I can't imagine the pain and hate you must all feel for him. I will keep you all in my thoughts and prayers forever.
“I’ve believed it since day one” instead of “I’m innocent” is just one of his telling lies. This guy is sick. RIP to all the victims.
He also said in court "I believe no proof was shown" which only a guilty person would say.
Very good point
@@velvetfog4310 what other could he said, or should said?
Piers, as usual, enters the interview with a pre-conceived bias. He continously interrupts his guest until time runs out, and we are left with more questions than answers. The same strategy that he used with Mo Hijab, Bassem Youssef, and others.
Yea Piers is a horrible, arrogant, extremely bias. And I just can tell he treats people “beneath” him in professional and personal setting like peasants! And his interview skills are embarrassingly bad!
*_Yeah I said the same!! I wish it was anyone but Pierce who did the interview.. He said all he wanted to do was to break Alex H. & when he couldn’t he lost patience & got mad himself, you could so tell at the end lol.._*
*_I wish it was Soledad O’Brien who did the interview!! She’s way better at interviewing serial killers.._*
He's not qualified to interview serial killers. He doesn't know how to read body language. He doesn't understand the psychopathy he's dealing with. He talks too much.
It's his show.... that's his 'schtick'.
Piers really annoys me because he constantly interrupts; there’s only one interviewer who is worse … Gayle King. 😖🙆🏽🤯🙇🏼♀️🫨
There are no ways to describe what an awful interview this was. He didn't let the man speak at all. Thumbs down. I don't know what I believe because Morgan wouldn't shut up long enough to let him talk
Yup.
This one I think could be innocent.
If the evidence wasn't thrown away, let's do DNA tests.
Wanna' bet that stuff was tossed?
Once DNA testing was common, I'll get the detectives "lost" it.
Interrupting people is Piers' trade mark.
If he is innocent then he is also a victim...evidence is flimsy in this case
@@richardlawson6787 Not only flimsey, but rather absent,
The only truth that I heard him say that rolled of his tongue was there are people in here for worse crimes. I would truly like to know what is worse than killing a child in a psychopaths mind.
He's innocent
I didn't think that was a very good interview sorry
Such an underrated series. This and the one Piers did with women killers were both amazing
Also the one with Paris Bennett is incredibly chilling. He's the youngest and scariest of them all that Piers interviewed so far.
Agreed!! Hope this ch posts more of these! 👍✌️
Piers is a good interviewer !
We'll be uploading Killer Women with Piers Morgan soon 👀 So keep your eyes peeled!
@@ThanaBrunges-mx7ji Did you notice when he stood up after Henriquez had left he seemed to sigh deeply, maybe relax his shoulders? Must have been a REALLY stressful interview.
THE EYES OF A PERSON NEVER LIE. HES COLD, CALCULATED, EVIL, PERVERTED,
A few questions , completely offended him , when he turned his head to the left down . Searching for innocent answer .
Though Case 💔
That would count for the most of the popular western politicians!
@@polskikraj1 Think you're projecting
@@polskikraj1it's an obvious act. Like a child pretending they are sorry for something and looking for sympathy
@@polskikraj1 Piers or Alex?
I have been following you Pierce doing these interviews. It takes a special person to do something like this. You are doing an exceptional job. Just getting close to do an interview…scary enough as it is….is not an easy task. I hope this does not end up giving you nightmares as I can only listen to one here and there….don’t let the evil get to you and thank you for giving the ordinary folks a deeper look into the minds of these people.
I have never heard of this serial killer until now.
I learned of it first in a Netflix special in serial killers if I remember well.
I lived in NYC at the time, and I don't remember the case. Maybe they didn't want to spread fear to the 5 boroughs.
That arm crossing is mostly because the chair has no arm rest and he's a very heavy man. He's very uncomfortable sitting down like that.
He told you that? Who asked?
Plus, crossing his arms isn’t aggressive, it’s more of a guarded, closing yourself off, or comforting yourself gesture. Hands balled up in a fist and arms stretched out would be more of an aggressive, ready to fight stance.
Oh well
That’s very great observation.
Spot on observation! Sometimes a dog is a dog! The man cannot be comfortable in that tiny chair. I read a body language expert who said they always try to put the “person” in a physically uncomfortable interview position. They even talk about manipulating the temperature. The physical discomfort contributes to them making a mistake. You are sooo correct..
this series of interviews could be renamed "Piers Morgan Calls BS And Prisoners Storm Off Angrily"
😂😂😂😂haaa that’s what I’m saying such sensitive bish
Piers Morgan is a clown..
@@mrhappyfolger2721I suppose you're all for the killer.
I didnt see a prisoner ‘storming of agrily’🤔🙄
Just doesn't have the same ring to it.
I would have liked to hear the guy speak more. We watch these as a sort of character study, so listening. To their thought process is imperative to this.
Why is pier emotional? Allow the man to also speak and tell us why he thinks he is innocent maybe we can see through him some more.
The problem is every time he buts in to give his evidence that he is innocent he either goes on a rant about how no one ever lets him give his evidence, or he goes off on another tangent deflecting from the question/ issues being discussed. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. He had a whole trial that was about evidence & his rebuttals/ 'evidence'/excuses
@@Margaret-n5x He interrupted him constantly. The guy asked at the end if he could explain and Piers said the interview was over. I like Piers but this was terribly biased and not a truly journalistic interview.
@@DarlaAnne I agree that Piers seems to cut him off a lot, but I also suspect that the show is heavily edited because Henriquez says very little of substance & rants/ rambles/ deflects constantly.
It is also about control. Henriquez is trying to control the situation with protestations of innocence, corruption, everybody else is lying etc, classic control technique of narcissists/ sociopaths. Piers is trying to take control from him by shutting him down. It doesn't make for the best tv, but all the arguments & evidence of a 6 week trial won't fit into a 50 minute show that includes discussions with other people. I think the program mainly focuses on revealing his arrogant non-empathetic narcissistic personality & delusions, & highlights some particular lies & gaslighting.
@@Margaret-n5x I understand that. I started out watching this very much not liking the guy but it was still a fail on the part of Piers to not let him finish his sentences for whatever parts were kept in the interview.
It left a lot of us wondering and kinda backfired as now I'm seeing quite a few comments wondering about his guilt.
This guy can be a total narcissist and yet not be guilty of the crimes. There's no physical evidence, only circumstantial which is pretty insane for a death penalty conviction. I really wanted to hear what he had to say.
This was definitely a "get him" interview than anything exploring all of the aspects of the case.
That boy has enough money on his “book” to eat lots of honeybuns.
Tacos and lots n lots of rice & beans
😂🤣😂
He should be called the donut killer 😂😂😂
He said women love him he must have many gfs.
😂😂😂@@stevetrivago
Piers interviews are about hearing from Piers. Interviewees are just props for him to hear himself talk.
Piers was told just let him talk, to bad he didn't listen
@JamesTaylor-ir4ou
If that's true then Piers has met his his match in Alejandro Enriquez!
@patriciamoed9244
*too
The interviews are the best. Rather just a doc series. Interviews are fascinating because for normal people we dont have that type of mindset. I have study a bit of psychology for nursing in college and i always wondered what turns people to do crazy stuff. Its interesting to just sorta understand why people do it. Not that any of this is okay and its horrible but interesting of the mind. Is it from childhood is it a mental illness you know. The mind is super fascinating and complex. How we store memories or how we learn.
One thing always difficult to explain is that the crimes stop after the arrest.
This was literally about to be my comment..2shay❤
It means they've caught the killer. 🙄
@lemongate4869 Not always!, an intelligent criminal may very well cease all his activities at the moment of someone's arrest to reinforce the idea that the killer has been caught.
@@TvshkaHummaI'm frightened that you've pondered this.
Is common sense really @@migbham1
I think piers should give more them more time to explain themselves
Ahahah.
Not likely, Piers only likes the sound of his own voice
Mr. Morgan likes to talk and talk and never alllows those he interviews to fair chances to express themselves
Piers has no tact at all… to a point of being insecure. I wonder why he’s so insecure
@@nomarussia5085 You're so right.... he seems so insured and he tries to make up for his insecurity by interrupting those who he interviews and cutting them off and when ever they say stop doing that he doubles down on it with further interruptions!
I would love to see this guy take a lie detector test and see the results......
Same
The real psycopaths can pass lie detector tests
Yes, good idea, to take a lie detectors test!!!
It's not a lie detector. It's measuring sweat, heart rate and breathing variations which will show when the person is stressed. They use another type of test for male predators that involves a device placed around the males p€n1s and detects movements when the predator is shown images at random and then a random child is shown and if the pred is attracted to her/him then his member will move. The better test is a voice stress analysis.
And for those who say lie detector tests or polygraphs are NOT allowed during a trial, are wrong, they can be admitted if both sides agree. That's how we know they work. If they didn't they wouldn't let them at all
May all of the Victims Rest in Peace.
That guy looks like if Seinfeld cast someone to play a Serial Killer.
No soup for you
Accurate
😆
Could this guy be innocent? Have they done anything regarding dna?
With all due respect the comment is no more gullible than yours.
You can't make up your mind from a Piers Morgan interview, by his own admission Piers only cares about the dead girls, when a journalists job is to be impartial and to gather facts on both sides.
Like many on here, I'm not saying he isn't lying, but for me there isn't enough evidence and I would also like to know about DNA
@@catlovely5438 Thank you. SO true.
This guy has been convicted, he may have been just really lucky, or really smart! If u study any other serial killers they usually are very bright,until they get caught!!
He new she had flowers on her pants .before the police did.he must have done it.
Monster....look at his eyes... Guilty AF
This case needs a deep dive
Why?
@maher.itorer I'm genuinely conflicted..He looks like a trademark narcissist, but in the same token there isn't much physical evidence to tie him to many of the cases. Having said that I think he's guilty as sin
@@frankiephenomanalI gotta disagree. it's because of cases like this that "circumstantial evidence" is a thing. with regard to circumstance, this case literally checks every box - and pierce allowed us all to see for certain how much of a liar henriquez truly is when faced with these "coincidences".
@@frankiephenomanal
I totally agree with you 💯
@@wallach-correllebeing accused of M*rder is a huge deal. It’s another life on the line. There should be hard evidence not circumstantial. Just my opinion. I too am conflicted, I’m not sure either way
Interviewing murderers from prison….. how 80’s. That’s some real cutting edge journalism Piers!
Why do an interview when you won’t let him talk.. shut up will you, the more he talks the more we find out what he’s done!!
he did talk. He says the police are liars and blames everyone for being wrong. Like a flat-earther who says all the scientists worldwide, and gov are all cooking up a big lie. If you let them get power in the conversation they will go on for hours and lay blame. There was a witness who saw him by his car where one of the body's was found who picked him out of a line up of men. He said he could never hurt a child but was convicted of scalding a little innocent boy's whole back from top to bottom while in his care prior.
I agree
Its no coincidence that he knew all the victims.. Either he's the worlds unluckiest guy or he's guilty af
He is guilty as fox’s and arrogant. Why is the victim in his wife clothing
@@spinrash6000 and how did he know what the babies under garments looked like 🤔 perv smh
How many people do you know?
@@kagzo2That's a silly argument. I'd be very concerned if a whole bunch of people I know are murdered.
Y’all do know the police lie all the time in Baltimore there is a police unit in prison for framing people search it not saying he innocent but police do lie n play mind games they just be wanting a conviction
His mother knew the truth
Thank goodness that he is locked away for ever. A real piece of work.
You think so, without any piece of real evidence ?
I am uncomfortable with this case because the evidence is not strong. There is a chance he is innocent.
I'm not saying he's innocent but I didn't hear a lot of actual, solid evidence.
i agree with 100 percent ! how did this guy get convicted
Agreed. I believe this man was wrongly convicted.
I've seen SO many interviews killers have a bad arrogance and persona about them that they just CANT hide!
This guy's I believe is innocent! He was the perfect convenient person in the 'neighbourhood' but killers don't dump bodies close to home!! Cops were SO PRESSURED due to this case and horrendous for corruption back in the Bronx in those days.
All will be brought to light some day.
God Knows 😊❤
Wouldn't it Make sense for the real killer to stop killing for awhile, at least in that area if they found another guy?
“Killers don’t dump bodies close to home” 😂 Ever hear of John Wayne Gacy?
He has an "on stage" personality. He puts on a performance. Monster
Yes, very obvious.
How
Yesssss I loveee this series! Ty for posting more of these serial killer interviews w Piers.. I find them incredibly interesting !
The fact he doesn’t want to talk about past events of abuse to a child, cheating and lying says a lot.
Prison has only made him more cunning and a more confidently skilled sociopath.
He pretty bad a lying. He clearly is delusional and expects others to believe his delusions
No. I think he was far better in the old videos. In this recent interview, he messed up a few times.
@@WheresWaldo05 like where?
We cannot rely on what we perceive of other people. This man seems to be in prison just because of what people think. The absolute truth is they have no strong evidence. Everyone just talking based on emotions. He could be the killer, but we need strong evidence to be sure
I DO NOT FIND THIS INTERVIEW COMFORTABLE TO WATCH. A lot of innocent people have been sent to prison. This man could be guilty or innocent, but it was not proven that he is guilty. I wonder how anyone feels comfortable listening to those detectives telling us what to think. They were under pressure to convict someone and this looks like terrible job from the police. Rhey should have done better.
If he weren’t guilty, he would’ve begged for interviews! PERIOD!
Although, What about DNA 🧬 🤔 YES? No?
Wasn’t available back then. But it is now. They could exhume the bodies or maybe they have evidence
That's exactly what I was thinking. Back then even if foreign fluids, hair etc was found on a body there was no DNA testing but many crimes have been solved since thanks to stored items and DNA testing
Oh really, Is that way Jodi Arias begged for interviews??? Go off🙄
I Think At The 7 Minute Mark Of The Interview. He Said There's A Lot Of Worse Crimes Than This. Then He Back Tracked And Said It's The Worse Crime. INTERESTING
After 40 years, I still find it hard to listen to law enforcement experts.
What the public fails to recognize, the motivation to solve any crime, is very high by any means.
The families dealing with these tragedies, my heart goes out too.
Cab drivers like police part of the landscape.
With so many coincidences, it's hard to look elsewhere.
Hopefully, they have the right guy.
Piers.....you never seize to disappoint.
And thats why a jury of our peers make the final call. Not just Law Enforcement. If Law Enforcement was the absolute decision maker, then I think we would be in trouble. With that said, the justice system isnt always perfect. The jury system is so important.
@@TwinRandoms oh okay. So if the police and jury aren't good enough, then what do you suppose we do?
@@TwinRandomsthis is not about law enforcement. The sicko knew all the victims
Juries consist of lay people, who can be easily manipulated by both lawyers and prosecutors. Or have prejudices and biases of their own.
Better would be a team of judges, who actually studied law. Those judges are checked by an independend group with judical knowledge, to see if they stick to procedure, handled evidence the right way and are unbiased towards the case to start with.
Judical trials always reminds me of drama series, but I guess it makes for good television.