I would love to get The dimensions of this machine I’m a Modder in the farming simulator community this machine might be my next project depending on if I can find all the right information
as soon as i saw this tractor i was like " omg i need it in FS22" haha. quite a challenge to mod tho.. the moving cabin , the vertical to horizontal folding, ability to change module.. Let me know if you have a github or a mean to follow your works, i'd be interested in testing it if you needs a tester :)
I am Caleb an aspiring farmer. My family owns Horning farms inc in South Dakota so i go there every year and last year the nexat harvester was harvesting there crops. it was an amazing experience to see it and i think it is a ground breaking invention. If you could in a future video can you please give there farm a shout out. Saw in person its amazing
As a Ukrainian, I can say that the funniest part of all this is the fact that it is completely made in Germany, in Ukraine it passes only field tests. Because it's more cost-effective. Funny.
@@denzzlinga Huh? never been to Australia, Canada USA? Average size farm in Germany is 450 acres, and in Alberta Canada 1168 acres. Although those 1168 acres aren't in one field, there will be a lot of fields that are 960 acres. (2 sections of 480 acres in a rectangle bordered by roads.) Maybe you were just joking?
@@alm7707 no his comment was spot on, this is a machine in its final testing phase, so where can a german manufacturer go with large enough fields in europe? right Ukraine or Russia, not even poland has fields of that scale as these two countries do so appropriately test a machine without incurring excessive transportation costs that doesn't justify what they aim to achieve during their test. his comment was not abt WHO has the largest fields which you tried to imply
Come to think of it, this format really makes sense. When you want to cover lots of width, the carrying vehicle and supporting machinery must be distributed along the width. You could even attach several of these in a train-like configuration and deploy them in parallel on the field. Transport longitudinally, work sideways. It really makes sense to me as the next step to make production more granular. You no longer need to stick implements on a single carrier vehicle, you will basically be purchasing "lengths" of carrier and implements.
Yes, but it doesnt change anything, it never ends. Price of these go so high, it doesnt benefit the and customer. Food costs the same - and/or keep climbing. It just another way, it moves the money flow, but in the and of the day in a big picture and a long run - it doesnt change anything what would matter. And after this it is new this and new that, it never ends. It these would change things, give people cheaper food/give farmers more money etc. Then it would be great - but they dont. Thats the bottom line unfortunately.
@@RoisinT2 how much cheaper do u want food to go? food has never been cheaper than it is today thanks to equipment and technical advancement like this! your comment is rather uninformed and ignorant to the standards we have achieved in terms food security and food prices than we have ever seen. if anyone benefits from it, it is THE CUSTOMER at the end of the day as they allow products to be offered cheaper to the end consumer. the next step for a lot of produce would be to hand it out for free, whereas most farmers barely can make ends needs today - because of people like you that can not have it ever cheap enough.....
@@rejiko if anyone here doesnt know shit what they are talking about, its you.. The excuse / selling speech of these has always been just that, nothing to do with my opinion on food prizes. I farm, so i know exatcly... This is why i said what i said. We dont get shit, but it still doesnt effect food prizes, and come to here youll see how cheap it is.. if milk litre is 1.45€ in shop, farmer gets 38-42c, for example, something aint right. It is with everything, it is the middle/everyone around whos taking the money, customers pay the prize farmers etc. role is to do the job. Again, these do not help. They only add costs. It is an illusion.. you dont see the whole picture. Its an never ending cycle, designed to make money for the big boys and corporates, not regular people.
Original combine design matched the input heads which were like 3m max, heads got stupidly wide (16m) and the combine unit itself stayed the same, it was only a matter of time.
Imo automating farm machinery isn't really a problem. The problem is that something always gets stuck, snaps, breaks so you always need someone around the machines.
@@noni-lx1it because it was new and untested. Many refused the idea, especially older generations. Not saying this will take off, but itll certainly be an interesting playout.
"first machine of it's kind" ok so we just going to ignore the old uni system that came out some time in the 1960s? And the Minneapolis Moline uni tractor before that?
I know you are watching this Kaleb. It is only thanks to you and Jeremy that I now watch tractor videos. Do you think Jeremy will buy one of these it would surely be better than his Lamborghini.
@@Zero01k looking up bi-rotor combine. i can understand to much track. way to much track in a single run in length and width. that bi-rotor turns and half the track width tears off the top soil is what i am guessing.
Monster!! What is the % of recovery compared to other large scale machines in current production? What is the rate of harvest per acre/yeild? If it can compete with the big manufacturers, then bring it! It would be interesting to test this beast on some of the large wheat feilds in Canada, corn field of Wisconsin or Nebraska, maybe some cotton in Arizona, and maybe throw in swathing in New Mexico.
The concept here is quite interesting & is really a fresh approach, IMO. However, I'm not sure this version could keep up to the high end units from the incumbents. IE, the JD X9 can run a 16 row head at 10 mph in heavy corn (200-250 bu/ac) and process 7000 bushels/hr. This Nexat is only running at 4mph in lighter corn(~110bu/ac), albeit with a bit wider head. Not using a grain cart slows productivity down a lot as well. Perhaps as the concept is developed and refined, it will close the gap. It does appear to offer the potential of less capital investments in equipment and labour, which could be helpful.
@@thezoomguys385 That was my thoughts. I am not in the industry, however still have family and friends that farm and that just seemed slow and not as productive. Awesome idea though
@@thezoomguys385 didn't he say 12ton/ha? Wouldn't that be 6 ton/ac or 214ish bu/ac? I think canola or some of the more challenging crops would be interesting. It looks basically like a Gleaner threshing system.
@@jacoblandis4535It is, but it apparently splits the crop in two directions. You could argue it's the next step in the transverse rotor design. It can unload while still harvesting, but the grain cart has to make its own tracks rather than being in the traffic controlled system.
For very large western or midwestern American farms, this set up seems to be to be offering really strong competition to John Deere et al (meaning all American manufacturers of farming equipment) and I wonder if they are even aware this exists. This seems to be amazingly future oriented and I wonder if Deere is ready for this level of competition.
How would you pull it out? If you attach a chain to the back it'll pivot and you'll have to keep shifting side-to-side or use two tractors, one each end. Of course the farm got rid of those tractors because this does everything.
I don't get it, is it supposed to have less dry mass than a combine? The track spacing wouldn't seem relevant to compaction as long as the attachment width is the same.
Its using each track twice,so half as many compacted tracks in the field at the same machine width. Every single field operation uses those tracks year after year.
Looks expensive. If 17 meters is the biggest they got that is only 55 feet. There are already combines with 60 feet headers. It seems pretty slow going through the field. It would be interesting to see how many acres it could cut in a day vs a traditional combine.
Much bigger hopper. With Combining the limiting factor is hand-off to other grain carts or trailers - A bigger storage tank helps with needing less transports less often meaning less manpower, less transports less delays to empty and less Frenetic emptying.
I don't think speed is the goal yet. Everything about the design is about trying to maximize the benefits of a controlled traffic system. With that said, I think it could benefit from the combine module having two feeder houses as that is the apparent limiting factor for harvesting capacity.
I wonder if that's practical or theoretical capacity. When they showed it unloading there was a lot of unused space available but it looked like the dimensions (long and thin) made it very hard to actually use that space.
Nifty way to move it down the road. Other than that, it's just big & expensive with no highlighted technical breakthroughs. Essentially two traditional combines with one operator. I guess the other operator is looking for a job. This machine will plug badly in downed fields. Running too much material into that single center conveyer. Only to then redivide the material into two threshing paths. That's two 90 Degree turns which always plug up in a combine. It should have two conveyers feeding directly from the header into the two threshing paths. The operator is doing a lot of tweaking on that joystick. I would expect a machine this expensive to be more automated.
It's a neat idea but as a farmer on a farm with 10k acres it seems like there really isn't a reason to get one of these like yeah it can both spray, plant, and harvest, but here we spray during planting often at the same time the planters are going. We also do some spraying during harvest, it seems like I'd need three of these to replace two combines and a sprayer anyways.
They highlighted a couple benefits. 1. Same tracks each pass meaning no other compaction from different width machines 2. Larger capacity than normal conventional farm equipment 3. 1 piece of equipment for all jobs 4. Quicker equipment chassis swaps 5. Remove controlled (seen in last scene) 6. Faster unload times on the auger. Its not many improvements, but it certainly has them. Any little bit helps. I'm sure the maintenance costs and parts make this machin impractical ATM, but noone knows what the future holds.
@@johnsundhagen324 that was my thought too. We'd need at least 2 to do both spring planting and tillage at the same time. It would have to be awfully efficient to get by with just 1.
Seems like it may still have problems in muddy conditions since the tracks would still run in the same path on one side. A conventional combine runs on a new track every pass.
And what kind of machine can we expect to come along side this for the unloading? That's a big hopper so bigger grain carts must also be made. Not efficient to run 3 tractors or more with todays gear.
I just rewrote your point ... Sorry about that , I had not read it . But yeah ... My point also . And further more ... Relying on ONE master drive for many tasks is asking for trouble at one point if it breaks down ... Like big time nightmare . Good day Rick ...
If you noticed it was working on ground that's as flat as a board and optimum conditions. Put it in soft ground, hills, stony fields storm damaged crops weeds, very dusty conditions etc and other less than ideal conditions then we'll see how good it does. Don't get me wrong it's huge step forward but the thing looks vulnerable and not very adaptable.
This would be used on very large open flat fields obviously. Plenty of those around in Russia, Eastern / Northern Europe, America, and so on. Where I live, you couldn't possibly drive it on public roads.
If it works and works well it will be a success. Some inaccuracies regarding existing machinery on this video . but will be interesting to see this machine evolve
Really neat doc, thank you for making it available! Little note: it's now just "Ukraine", "The Ukraine" was a soviet era title they wish not to hear if IIRC
As a Ukrainian, I can say that the funniest part of all this is the fact that it is completely made in Germany, in Ukraine it passes only field tests. Because it's more cost-effective. Funny.
@@NineteenNinetyFork The nomenclature The Ukraine has existed since the times when Ukraine had only 20% of the current territory and was assigned by the Russian Empire, it functioned as a buffer region, basically meaning The Frontier. Subsequently, the Empire added territories and the USSR did the same, culminating in the current borders, so it is false to attribute that designation to the USSR. Anyway, The Ukraine sounds a lot better.
Well they tried something different? I'm not sure if it's harder to change out an implement with a tractor or get the implements hauled to the field then change them out offset? Its something different thats for sure.
@@chadjustice8560 I was thinking the same thing. I will admit that a lot of North American farm machinery is quite complex but European and German equipment always seems much more complicated than necessary. I watched European farmers move into our area back in the 1980s and couldn’t help but wonder why they had to do everything so backwards. Efficiency didn’t seem to be a driving consideration of anything they did.
How many fiddly bits, how easy is it to do maintenance ? Are wear parts like Tires/belts inexpensive? What would the cost of ownership look like? (Ah good, found website.)
I'd like to see this thing directly compared with some John Deere combines so I can get an idea of just how much better this thing could be than what's currently available around the US
Nexat's fate is that of the Fendt Trisix: in a couple years, it'll be history. It doesn't bring anything new, it is not revolutionary (no matter how much they try to push it), it is not disruptive, it does not reinvent the wheel.
I'm not a hillbilly but I do like in the country and been around a few farms n see the cost of some of there equipment. This thing I'd love to know the cost to buy it run it repair it.. bet it's mind-blowing
Why not Canada and do testing on Mike Mitchel Faith hope farm. He tests equipment like no other. The acreage they farm is massive although no maize, mainly lentils chickpeas durum and odd bit of canola. Their equipment is massive too.
I would love to get The dimensions of this machine I’m a Modder in the farming simulator community this machine might be my next project depending on if I can find all the right information
I was hoping someone would see this and put it in FS22. You will really turn some heads if you can pull this off!
as soon as i saw this tractor i was like " omg i need it in FS22" haha. quite a challenge to mod tho.. the moving cabin , the vertical to horizontal folding, ability to change module.. Let me know if you have a github or a mean to follow your works, i'd be interested in testing it if you needs a tester :)
Yes, same! Would love to see a high quality version of this in FS22. It would be great exposure for the company
im waiting for it!
Are you going to try it if it works for all platforms?
I am Caleb an aspiring farmer. My family owns Horning farms inc in South Dakota so i go there every year and last year the nexat harvester was harvesting there crops. it was an amazing experience to see it and i think it is a ground breaking invention. If you could in a future video can you please give there farm a shout out. Saw in person its amazing
As a Ukrainian, I can say that the funniest part of all this is the fact that it is completely made in Germany, in Ukraine it passes only field tests. Because it's more cost-effective. Funny.
And you got much much larger fields then anywere in germany.
@@denzzlinga Huh? never been to Australia, Canada USA? Average size farm in Germany is 450 acres, and in Alberta Canada 1168 acres. Although those 1168 acres aren't in one field, there will be a lot of fields that are 960 acres. (2 sections of 480 acres in a rectangle bordered by roads.) Maybe you were just joking?
@@alm7707 no his comment was spot on, this is a machine in its final testing phase, so where can a german manufacturer go with large enough fields in europe? right Ukraine or Russia, not even poland has fields of that scale as these two countries do so appropriately test a machine without incurring excessive transportation costs that doesn't justify what they aim to achieve during their test. his comment was not abt WHO has the largest fields which you tried to imply
ha i thought from the title is was built or designed in ukraine. thanks for the clarification
@@denzzlinga larger but full of holes
Good but... how many russian tanks can it tow at the same time?
All of them, I hope
Come to think of it, this format really makes sense. When you want to cover lots of width, the carrying vehicle and supporting machinery must be distributed along the width. You could even attach several of these in a train-like configuration and deploy them in parallel on the field. Transport longitudinally, work sideways. It really makes sense to me as the next step to make production more granular. You no longer need to stick implements on a single carrier vehicle, you will basically be purchasing "lengths" of carrier and implements.
Yes, but it doesnt change anything, it never ends. Price of these go so high, it doesnt benefit the and customer. Food costs the same - and/or keep climbing. It just another way, it moves the money flow, but in the and of the day in a big picture and a long run - it doesnt change anything what would matter. And after this it is new this and new that, it never ends.
It these would change things, give people cheaper food/give farmers more money etc. Then it would be great - but they dont. Thats the bottom line unfortunately.
@@RoisinT2 how much cheaper do u want food to go? food has never been cheaper than it is today thanks to equipment and technical advancement like this! your comment is rather uninformed and ignorant to the standards we have achieved in terms food security and food prices than we have ever seen. if anyone benefits from it, it is THE CUSTOMER at the end of the day as they allow products to be offered cheaper to the end consumer. the next step for a lot of produce would be to hand it out for free, whereas most farmers barely can make ends needs today - because of people like you that can not have it ever cheap enough.....
@@rejiko if anyone here doesnt know shit what they are talking about, its you..
The excuse / selling speech of these has always been just that, nothing to do with my opinion on food prizes.
I farm, so i know exatcly... This is why i said what i said. We dont get shit, but it still doesnt effect food prizes, and come to here youll see how cheap it is.. if milk litre is 1.45€ in shop, farmer gets 38-42c, for example, something aint right. It is with everything, it is the middle/everyone around whos taking the money, customers pay the prize farmers etc. role is to do the job.
Again, these do not help. They only add costs. It is an illusion.. you dont see the whole picture. Its an never ending cycle, designed to make money for the big boys and corporates, not regular people.
Original combine design matched the input heads which were like 3m max, heads got stupidly wide (16m) and the combine unit itself stayed the same, it was only a matter of time.
@@rejiko food might be the cheapest ever, its also the worst ever.
*Truly an enormous machine, it's a game-changer.*
The word "monster" comes to mind. This strikes me as something much easier to automate than a traditional combine harvester.
Imo automating farm machinery isn't really a problem. The problem is that something always gets stuck, snaps, breaks so you always need someone around the machines.
@@noni-lx1it because it was new and untested. Many refused the idea, especially older generations. Not saying this will take off, but itll certainly be an interesting playout.
This video makes me want to start my own garden right away
"first machine of it's kind" ok so we just going to ignore the old uni system that came out some time in the 1960s? And the Minneapolis Moline uni tractor before that?
I would have not know of that if you did not say anything, thanks!
these type of people think history starts with them that's why we repeat our failures over and over a simpler term to use is arrogance.
Can't help but think about an enormous rolling printer. 😃Amazing machine!
you could probably design an implement that works as a printer, and replace the grain tanks with ink/paint tanks =]
Revolutionizing the Combine, for sure...Hope it doesn't cost a billon $$$.
*Absolutely, this approach is ingenious. Distributing equipment width-wise and working sideways can maximize efficiency. Modular and versatile!* 🚜🌾
I know you are watching this Kaleb.
It is only thanks to you and Jeremy that I now watch tractor videos.
Do you think Jeremy will buy one of these it would surely be better than his Lamborghini.
Yeah this thing will start a revolution...watch all the others follow them. This is very clever, and is a game changer for efficiency.
Nobody followed in New Idea's UNI system footsteps, or the Bi-Rotor combine
@@Zero01k looking up bi-rotor combine. i can understand to much track. way to much track in a single run in length and width. that bi-rotor turns and half the track width tears off the top soil is what i am guessing.
Here is part 2 of the NEXAT: th-cam.com/video/4Iex9n22Fm8/w-d-xo.html
Amazing Germany built combine’s
Monster!! What is the % of recovery compared to other large scale machines in current production? What is the rate of harvest per acre/yeild? If it can compete with the big manufacturers, then bring it! It would be interesting to test this beast on some of the large wheat feilds in Canada, corn field of Wisconsin or Nebraska, maybe some cotton in Arizona, and maybe throw in swathing in New Mexico.
The concept here is quite interesting & is really a fresh approach, IMO. However, I'm not sure this version could keep up to the high end units from the incumbents. IE, the JD X9 can run a 16 row head at 10 mph in heavy corn (200-250 bu/ac) and process 7000 bushels/hr. This Nexat is only running at 4mph in lighter corn(~110bu/ac), albeit with a bit wider head. Not using a grain cart slows productivity down a lot as well. Perhaps as the concept is developed and refined, it will close the gap. It does appear to offer the potential of less capital investments in equipment and labour, which could be helpful.
@@thezoomguys385 That was my thoughts. I am not in the industry, however still have family and friends that farm and that just seemed slow and not as productive. Awesome idea though
@@thezoomguys385 didn't he say 12ton/ha? Wouldn't that be 6 ton/ac or 214ish bu/ac?
I think canola or some of the more challenging crops would be interesting. It looks basically like a Gleaner threshing system.
@@jacoblandis4535It is, but it apparently splits the crop in two directions. You could argue it's the next step in the transverse rotor design.
It can unload while still harvesting, but the grain cart has to make its own tracks rather than being in the traffic controlled system.
For very large western or midwestern American farms, this set up seems to be to be offering really strong competition to John Deere et al (meaning all American manufacturers of farming equipment) and I wonder if they are even aware this exists. This seems to be amazingly future oriented and I wonder if Deere is ready for this level of competition.
Sure Deere is aware. They will simply purchase one, copy it. Paint it green. Advertise it as their newest wonderful invention years in the making.
Deere can probably make this themselves. Lol, traditional combiners
If it ever starts gaining traction (pun not intended), JD will simply buy the company
@@OliCM3 you can only buy something when the owner is willing to sell it. If they just refuse the offer, they got to deal with the competition.
@@denzzlinga Enough money will buy you anything.
I live in the USA in craigville IN. I would love to try a unit!!! And have a field day to show them I got a 430ac. Field we could run it in,
I wonder where you hook on that machine to pull it out after it gets stuck
How would you pull this out of the mud if it got stuck!?
Probably in 3 peices.I still like my 9510 JD.
Sophisticated agricultural machines that big companies must have
А я всегда говорил что нужна именно платформа для различных целей, такой себе бюджетный вариант
Multi purpose
I HOPE ALL 🙏 PEOPLE WHO WORK ON THE LAND IN UKRAINE 🇺🇦 ARE SAFE 🇦🇺
Их уже едят черви
@@boynextdoor69 черви пожирают российских оккупантов, 170 тысяч нямки
@@boynextdoor69 как и твою мать)
I'm a farmer and have to say that's a bit much! Lol Interesting tho! I guess time will tell how such a build makes out! Thanks for sharing!
Certainly a bit much and will steer many away for the time being. Time will tell as always
i used to think that about 25 ft cut combines!
@@brandoncaldwell95 indeed it will!
@@bens8919 haha you right, size is always expanding! But this is totally different build! Lol
I like how he opens up the segment by saying an exciting trip to Ukraine. I bet he never knew how much that phrase ever came to life
what if it gets stuck, would hate to pull this thing out.
How would you pull it out? If you attach a chain to the back it'll pivot and you'll have to keep shifting side-to-side or use two tractors, one each end. Of course the farm got rid of those tractors because this does everything.
Alright for flat open land, I seriously doubt it would work on undulating uneven ground unless they make a different model
"Oh, you will need the deluxe suspension option. Slight increase in cost though!"
Not designed for undulating ground though.
I done been everywhere but the electric chair and seen everything but the wind blow, except for this, it blew my mind at first sight.
I don't get it, is it supposed to have less dry mass than a combine? The track spacing wouldn't seem relevant to compaction as long as the attachment width is the same.
Its using each track twice,so half as many compacted tracks in the field at the same machine width. Every single field operation uses those tracks year after year.
@@lynwessel2471 Ohhhhhh, that makes way more sense. So effectively the same reduction in growing area as if the attachment width was double?
@@alexanderx33 Yes and the biggest benefit is 90+% of the field receives no soil compaction from machinery at all by using the same paths every time
Looks expensive. If 17 meters is the biggest they got that is only 55 feet. There are already combines with 60 feet headers. It seems pretty slow going through the field. It would be interesting to see how many acres it could cut in a day vs a traditional combine.
Much bigger hopper. With Combining the limiting factor is hand-off to other grain carts or trailers - A bigger storage tank helps with needing less transports less often meaning less manpower, less transports less delays to empty and less Frenetic emptying.
I don't think speed is the goal yet. Everything about the design is about trying to maximize the benefits of a controlled traffic system. With that said, I think it could benefit from the combine module having two feeder houses as that is the apparent limiting factor for harvesting capacity.
No mention of costs for purchase and maintenance... hmmm?
Wow this is a wet dream for Zack Johnson I bet !
What a beast !
Amazing technology! Thanks for the video.
Here is part 2 of the NEXAT story: th-cam.com/video/4Iex9n22Fm8/w-d-xo.html
*1021 Bushels in the harvesting module....thats 21 bushels more than a Tribine! Nexat is the worlds largest combine harvester!*
bushels?
It can be even bigger!
I wonder if that's practical or theoretical capacity. When they showed it unloading there was a lot of unused space available but it looked like the dimensions (long and thin) made it very hard to actually use that space.
@@ssi3262 Four pecks to a bushel.
Wow, this isn't clickbait, it's actually real
I've been wondering what the next step would look like in Combines. This is it!
What a MONSTER absolute perfection! Really well done
In this day and age, should it be fully electric??? On cable. And battery for transport
Electric power generated by using a diesel engine 🤣 ..... Or plugged into a thousand solar panels that takes a month to charge.
Nifty way to move it down the road. Other than that, it's just big & expensive with no highlighted technical breakthroughs. Essentially two traditional combines with one operator. I guess the other operator is looking for a job.
This machine will plug badly in downed fields. Running too much material into that single center conveyer. Only to then redivide the material into two threshing paths. That's two 90 Degree turns which always plug up in a combine. It should have two conveyers feeding directly from the header into the two threshing paths.
The operator is doing a lot of tweaking on that joystick. I would expect a machine this expensive to be more automated.
It's a neat idea but as a farmer on a farm with 10k acres it seems like there really isn't a reason to get one of these like yeah it can both spray, plant, and harvest, but here we spray during planting often at the same time the planters are going. We also do some spraying during harvest, it seems like I'd need three of these to replace two combines and a sprayer anyways.
They highlighted a couple benefits.
1. Same tracks each pass meaning no other compaction from different width machines
2. Larger capacity than normal conventional farm equipment
3. 1 piece of equipment for all jobs
4. Quicker equipment chassis swaps
5. Remove controlled (seen in last scene)
6. Faster unload times on the auger.
Its not many improvements, but it certainly has them. Any little bit helps. I'm sure the maintenance costs and parts make this machin impractical ATM, but noone knows what the future holds.
@@johnsundhagen324 that was my thought too. We'd need at least 2 to do both spring planting and tillage at the same time. It would have to be awfully efficient to get by with just 1.
It’s basically set up for 1000 acre/ 500/hectare fields. How would you expect to do end rows with this thing
what happens when its wet conditions? oh wait you don't have a second tractor anymore. How and where do you drag it out from?
Width / height when folded for transportation?
Wider tracks for wet conditions?
Offload grain on the fly?
Fuel consumption rate?
Ok I've see it with a corn head but never a straight header why is that like can it not handle the bulk of the stem and head ?
th-cam.com/video/gh9gNbYAL3I/w-d-xo.htmlm34s
Can it tow a Russian Tank?
Seems like it may still have problems in muddy conditions since the tracks would still run in the same path on one side. A conventional combine runs on a new track every pass.
Yes, it certainly wont replace every other combine, but in some conditions and climates, it will dominate.
Things like this would only work in countries with massive open areas
This machine would not work at all on much of the farmland in the world.
@@manyamile410 ye
And what kind of machine can we expect to come along side this for the unloading? That's a big hopper so bigger grain carts must also be made. Not efficient to run 3 tractors or more with todays gear.
💪💪💪🤩AWESOME MACHINERY 😍😍😍😍😍
Nice work Ucrania 👏 !!.
Saludos desde las Américas .
Bad ass farm equipment. Love how this thing is adaptable. Hopefully their business model isn't owner antagonistic....
Hej finns det återförsäljare i Sverige??
Фантастична машина!!! Слава Україні !!!
СЛАВА БОГУ.
Героям слава!
Jeremy Clarkson: "Gimme!"
The rest of his farming staff and girlfriend: *shakes head signalling no in unison*
Really a massive machine, its a game change
Ok... works great on flat land, but how does it handle a hill...
There is plenty of horsepower. If you are looking at some scenes filmed with the disc you'll see the hilly terrain on some of the customers fields.
New Idea came out with the UNI System back in the 1960's. It never really took off.
I just rewrote your point ... Sorry about that , I had not read it . But yeah ... My point also . And further more ... Relying on ONE master drive for many tasks is asking for trouble at one point if it breaks down ... Like big time nightmare . Good day Rick ...
If you noticed it was working on ground that's as flat as a board and optimum conditions. Put it in soft ground, hills, stony fields storm damaged crops weeds, very dusty conditions etc and other less than ideal conditions then we'll see how good it does. Don't get me wrong it's huge step forward but the thing looks vulnerable and not very adaptable.
This would be used on very large open flat fields obviously. Plenty of those around in Russia, Eastern / Northern Europe, America, and so on. Where I live, you couldn't possibly drive it on public roads.
That is the majority of terrain in Ukraine, similar to Canada or Midwest USA. My cousins live in the area where it was filmed.
Really impressive
If it works and works well it will be a success. Some inaccuracies regarding existing machinery on this video . but will be interesting to see this machine evolve
Your comment is soo much better than mine
70 metre spray boom is impressive....
@Hello Dan how are you doing?
@@lydiaanderson7226 all good thanks
What scams are you up to?
Is this actually better?, i mean normal tractors maybe take half the width but seem faster, so im wondering where are the +'s
How many T72 can this thing pull?
that is the future I really love this machine have a good-sized has 👍🏻
What happens when you get one stuck in the mud or on terrain?
can this plant a bean. Just wanted to plant a single bean and saw this great idea to save time planting a single bean.
ممكن نعمل خطط نزرعة الصحار الكبير ندرس المحصول المقاوم للحرارة والبرد نزرمحاصيل في الشتاء بكميات ضخمة حتي لو قطن لانن لدين ارض شاسعة اكثر من اوكرانية
Impressive !
That thing is huge!!!!
Really neat doc, thank you for making it available! Little note: it's now just "Ukraine", "The Ukraine" was a soviet era title they wish not to hear if IIRC
As a Ukrainian, I can say that the funniest part of all this is the fact that it is completely made in Germany, in Ukraine it passes only field tests. Because it's more cost-effective. Funny.
I like The ukraine
@@goodlife6277 cool opinion
@@NineteenNinetyFork The nomenclature The Ukraine has existed since the times when Ukraine had only 20% of the current territory and was assigned by the Russian Empire, it functioned as a buffer region, basically meaning The Frontier. Subsequently, the Empire added territories and the USSR did the same, culminating in the current borders, so it is false to attribute that designation to the USSR. Anyway, The Ukraine sounds a lot better.
@Smithy18 no it's not
how much does it approximately coast
So it’s basically a bigger version of the new idea unisystem?
Where does the grain or whatever your harvesting go?
How big would the other header be if it wasn’t for corn or sunflower cause you wouldn’t just keep a corn header on like they showed in video
Well...
th-cam.com/video/gh9gNbYAL3I/w-d-xo.htmlm1s
That's a nice rig
does it plough too
Most excellent video thanks
Great looking machine and a fantastic video. However, there is no country called "the Ukraine" (that's what Russia calls it)
It's just Ukraine. 👍👍
No, it's The Ukraine
@@goodlife6277 it S The FU
@@PUARockstar Just like your mother
Very nice drone chassis.
Yes, very exciting.kick off and play.. appreciate... look forward..
Boom bbcode..jm..
Wow! .... freaking amazing
I _really_ would like to be able to travel back to time to get a neolithic farmer, take him back to our time and show him this…
I would love to go back 40 years and show my father. He was a grain farmer in Australia up until the early 1980s.
Nice video my friend ❤❤❤❤
A very creative idea ❤❤❤❤
I look forward to seeing your designs. Congratulations on your journey forward🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
does vlad have his eye on all this farmland
Wow! That IS a HUGE machine!
Well they tried something different?
I'm not sure if it's harder to change out an implement with a tractor or get the implements hauled to the field then change them out offset?
Its something different thats for sure.
Oh man. They should try a pilot with Cornstar farms in the U.S. Good advertising
Much better video than the manufacturers.
Thought provoking machine, great video Jorn and Tammo
German engineering at it's best 👌
As in over complicated for no reason like everything else German?
@@chadjustice8560 dont forget unserviceable.
@@chadjustice8560 I was thinking the same thing. I will admit that a lot of North American farm machinery is quite complex but European and German equipment always seems much more complicated than necessary. I watched European farmers move into our area back in the 1980s and couldn’t help but wonder why they had to do everything so backwards. Efficiency didn’t seem to be a driving consideration of anything they did.
here we go with part 2 of the NEXAT story!
I love that machine
How many fiddly bits, how easy is it to do maintenance ? Are wear parts like Tires/belts inexpensive? What would the cost of ownership look like? (Ah good, found website.)
I'd like to see this thing directly compared with some John Deere combines so I can get an idea of just how much better this thing could be than what's currently available around the US
its a scam. look up ukraine corruption....
It's over 50% more productive in open field conditions. With twice the grain tank capacity
How can I demo this on my operation in America is this even out yet ?
Nexat's fate is that of the Fendt Trisix: in a couple years, it'll be history. It doesn't bring anything new, it is not revolutionary (no matter how much they try to push it), it is not disruptive, it does not reinvent the wheel.
Just like the Tribine, this will never catch on
I love watching this
What is he is saying here: @6:21
soil with minerals (good for plants)
I'm not a hillbilly but I do like in the country and been around a few farms n see the cost of some of there equipment.
This thing I'd love to know the cost to buy it run it repair it.. bet it's mind-blowing
Why not Canada and do testing on Mike Mitchel Faith hope farm. He tests equipment like no other. The acreage they farm is massive although no maize, mainly lentils chickpeas durum and odd bit of canola. Their equipment is massive too.
I might be wrong but it didn’t look like they had a Draper head for it. So not much mike could do with it other than a paper weight.
I think test location is the key; Ukraine is two hours away from Germany; or 12 hour drive.
Слава Україні , дякую за такі розробкі техніки
So, when is this coming to farming simulator?