NASA VS Elon Musk: NASA Lost, using any metric. These gentlemen are describing a new way of flushing your tax dollars down the toilet, don’t buy it. If the Musks of our world can’t do it, these bureaucrats with science degrees certainly can’t. Working for NASA? “Get a haircut and get a real job.”
@@nias2631 Well Musk does tend to give... While NASA just seems to take, and take... and take. So you see, Elon need not pay, comments like mine are profitable for all taxpayers to see. Thanks for the opportunity to rearticulate my point once again.
@@B0obJunior Is there a relevance? Of course there’s not. The taxpayers pay for both right? Also irrelevant. NASA is full of wasteful bureaucrats that produce little to nothing tangible for the multiple Billions they Receive… Musk: quite the contrary. Now that son, IS relevant.
You should really change your name. Helicity? Wtf are you thinking? And referring to the Fusion rockets as fusion guns It's going to make people think it's for war. I think you should be much more careful on how you approach your brand and your terminology
You are going to need much more funding. Wonderful concept. Good luck.
where were you when they announced fusion drive? absolutely amazing times to be alive
I've just been shown how The Expanse could be made real within a decade or so. Unreal.
If two people deserve knighthoods for contribution to science, it's Allan and Alice Bowman!
NASA VS Elon Musk: NASA Lost, using any metric.
These gentlemen are describing a new way of flushing your tax dollars down the toilet, don’t buy it.
If the Musks of our world can’t do it, these bureaucrats with science degrees certainly can’t.
Working for NASA? “Get a haircut and get a real job.”
How much is Musk paying you to post?
@@nias2631 Well Musk does tend to give... While NASA just seems to take, and take... and take.
So you see, Elon need not pay, comments like mine are profitable for all taxpayers to see.
Thanks for the opportunity to rearticulate my point once again.
@@4pharaoh You know NASA pays spaceX right? Of course you don't.
@@B0obJunior Is there a relevance? Of course there’s not.
The taxpayers pay for both right? Also irrelevant.
NASA is full of wasteful bureaucrats that produce little to nothing tangible for the multiple Billions they Receive…
Musk: quite the contrary. Now that son, IS relevant.
@@B0obJunior I think he does... SpaceX does the job far cheaper and on time compared to NASA and their friends like Lockheed and Boeing.
You should really change your name. Helicity? Wtf are you thinking? And referring to the Fusion rockets as fusion guns It's going to make people think it's for war. I think you should be much more careful on how you approach your brand and your terminology
No reverse gear, can't be helped.