Michael Horton: Is the Doctrine of Inerrancy Defensible?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • For centuries orthodox Christians have taught that the Holy Scriptures are inerrant. Skeptics, on the other hand, claim that this doctrine is meaningless, saying that the doctrine of inerrancy has died the death of a thousand qualifications. How should Christians respond? In this lecture, Dr. Michael Horton explains what inerrancy means and shows how and why it remains a defensible part of our confession.
    This message is from our 2010 National Conference, Tough Questions Christians Face: • Tough Questions Christ...
    Purchase this conference on DVD: www.ligonier.or...

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @spalding5198
    @spalding5198 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Much of this talk is off topic; this is josh McDowell and lee strobel material. He is not dealing with inerrancy and is avoiding the hard questions related thereto.

    • @johntobey1558
      @johntobey1558 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Chicago Statement and tge Theologians amd scholar's present should have been referenced for tge historically if tge movement. I fond Dr.James White more helpful on the topic of how the issue is defended and examined.

  • @Iamwrongbut
    @Iamwrongbut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is a great theological talk but doesn’t get into any hard texts. Here’s one to challenge people - is King Manasseh the primary reason for the exile because of his great sin and idolatry (see 2 Kings 21:9, 16, 23:26-27). Or did Manasseh actually repent and restore Yahweh worship in Israel according to 2 Chronicles 33:12-13, 16-17)?
    In Kings, Manasseh is the key reason the Babylonian exile occurs. In Chronicles, it’s the people and priests who were responsible for the exile (2 Chron 35:14-17), since Manasseh repented.
    How can both be true? How can God exile Judah for Manasseh’s sins (in Kings), even though he apparently repented of those sins (in Chronicles)!?!? And why would the author of Kings leave out Manasseh’s repentance? It seems like a HUGE detail to omit.

    • @spi1141
      @spi1141 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow you’re so enlightened. Perhaps if you listened again (Perhaps not.)
      You don’t get it do you?

    • @Iamwrongbut
      @Iamwrongbut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@spi1141 thanks for replying to my comment. I now see how they can be reconciled....

  • @jimijames7703
    @jimijames7703 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Four mins in and I’m concerned already