Mod-01 Lec-17 Addition of Angular Momenta - I

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 38

  • @easyway122
    @easyway122 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I read in book but didn't understand properly but now I understand clearly after watching this lecture thank you very much mam explain very well

  • @paulcravero5447
    @paulcravero5447 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is the best explanation of angular momentum addition that I have ever seen. Prof Bala's derivation in clear and logical steps is remarkable and should be studied by all other lecturers on this subject.

  • @mathforphysics
    @mathforphysics 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is an excellent lecture. I'm reviewing this because I'm interested in Lie Algebra. There is a lot out there , but I've never seen this material covered this methodically.

  • @raymondreddington6317
    @raymondreddington6317 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really thank you so much, I am coming from a very education system and trapped in some higher studies, but you have helped me out of this dilemma, thank you very much professor.

  • @vaibhavpratap1041
    @vaibhavpratap1041 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm a MSc student at IIT Indore . These lectures are really simple to understand. Thank you for this lecture series ✨

    • @chiragsharma5624
      @chiragsharma5624 ปีที่แล้ว

      which book you use i think its undergraduate qm i need to study qm for q computing is this series enough and good iam from electronics

    • @vaibhavpratap1041
      @vaibhavpratap1041 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chiragsharma5624 In undergrd. we were following QM by D J Griffith and in Masters Morden QM by J J Sakurai . Zetllie is also good .There are the basic lectures with some applications. You will have to follow more stuff for quantum computing . You are from electronics , I think you are in undergrad. You should go for MSc physics or i-phd . You will have to go in a good institute where quantum computing is being thought .
      And you should try for different research areas also , some students become blind behind the hipe of some advanced topics .

  • @mimbekhouche4664
    @mimbekhouche4664 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    U 're a perfect prof❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @tayyabahaider3872
    @tayyabahaider3872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ma'am thank you so much.. such a marvelous understanding and experience of quantum mechanics

  • @rgbulusu
    @rgbulusu 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    excellent. outstanding. Really interesting.

  • @itsme.damini
    @itsme.damini 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much ma'am for making this video.....its clear me hw to calculate cg coefficients....

  • @abhijithkannan643
    @abhijithkannan643 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    very clearly taught and extremely helpful. Thank you ma'am

  • @dipikamondal6544
    @dipikamondal6544 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you ma'am. Everything about CG coefficients, are clear.

  • @iyadindia862
    @iyadindia862 ปีที่แล้ว

    51:32
    why there is no + or - 1 1/[root(2)] for I 1,0> like the way we considered for I 0,0>
    CAN ANYONE EXplain

  • @bsstudy760
    @bsstudy760 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks mam, this video show how much indian are intelligent. Proud to be an indian

  • @ArdeshirBanerjee
    @ArdeshirBanerjee 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't know why this is going over my head. Until now, it was all right.

  • @MuhammadAsif-nt7zv
    @MuhammadAsif-nt7zv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What do you ment by vectors under rotation?

  • @jatinderbirsingh3721
    @jatinderbirsingh3721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing !

  • @cricketparadise2614
    @cricketparadise2614 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot Ma'am 🙏

  • @rohitpandey9391
    @rohitpandey9391 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou mam 🙏🙏 I got what I couldn't get

  • @ranabasaran
    @ranabasaran 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much professor

  • @GauravSingh-yo7hz
    @GauravSingh-yo7hz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice lecture 👌👌👌👌👌

  • @physics706
    @physics706 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    fatima4275, the coefficients are called clebsch Gordon coefficients..

  • @teweteeh2090
    @teweteeh2090 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @mushtaq07sayyad
    @mushtaq07sayyad 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent lecture

  • @yogishreearabindapanda2293
    @yogishreearabindapanda2293 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow!!! amazing

  • @alishaanjum1108
    @alishaanjum1108 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why m not gettin it😶

  • @ashkaralam845
    @ashkaralam845 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks you Ma'am

  • @rizwanasindhi6633
    @rizwanasindhi6633 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why do we make set of those which commute with each other????

    • @shrinkhalasharma7058
      @shrinkhalasharma7058 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      because commuting observables share the same eigenket

  • @giridharvemula8283
    @giridharvemula8283 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 24min of this video am not able to understand bcz m1 is j1-1 and m2 is j2-1 but why she added j1-1 with j2 why not j1-1 with j2-1

  • @krishnanandrai442
    @krishnanandrai442 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice lecture

  • @mmajid09
    @mmajid09 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks ...

  • @sagarrawal8332
    @sagarrawal8332 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was looking for Winger Eckart theorem...Anyone up for help??

  • @fikrebekele7418
    @fikrebekele7418 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Conti.ou best

  • @MuhammadAsif-nt7zv
    @MuhammadAsif-nt7zv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What do you ment by vectors under rotation?

  • @jyotirmayeepani7939
    @jyotirmayeepani7939 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much professor