Paris Nice 1992 - 07 Col d'Èze, Jean-François Bernard
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ก.ย. 2024
- Paris Nice 1992
7e étape, 2e secteur 15 mars Nice-Col d'Èze (clm) 12 km
1 Jean François Bernard (Banesto) FRA 22'15''
2 Tony Rominger (Clas - Cajastur) SUI 23''
3 Christophe Manin (R.M.O. - Mavic - Onet) FRA 57''
4 Julian Gorospe Artabe (Banesto) ESP 1'01''
5 Miguel Indurain (Banesto) ESP 1'10''
6 Jesus Montoya Alarcon (Amaya) ESP 1'21''
7 Jérôme Simon (Z - Lemond) FRA mt
8 Pascal Lance (Z - Lemond) FRA 1'38''
9 Rolf Gölz (Ariostea) ALL 1'41''
10 Eric Caritoux (R.M.O. - Mavic - Onet) FRA 1'45''
Paris-Nice 1992 est la 50e édition de Paris-Nice. La course cycliste s’est déroulée du 8 au 15 mars 1992. La course est gagnée par le Français Jean-François Bernard de l'équipe Banesto devant Tony Rominger (CLAS-Cajastur) et Miguel Indurain (Banesto).
Classification
1. Jean-François BERNARD (Fra) en 25h27'57"
2. Tony Rominger (Sui) à 34"
3. Miguel Indurain (Esp) à 1'17"
4. Jesus Montoya (Esp) à 1'46"
5. Christophe Manin (Fra) à 2'14"
6. Rolf Golz (All) à 2'38"
7. Jérôme Simon (Fra) à 3'14"
8. Julian Gorospe (Esp) à 3'17"
9. Oscar Vargas (Col) à 3'24"
10. Charly Mottet (Fra) à 3'29"
11. Giorgio Furlan (Ita) à 3'33"
12. Atle Kvalsvoll (Nor) à 4'03"
13. Eric Caritoux (Fra) à 4'09"
14. Jean-Cyril Robin (Fra) à 4'27"
15. Pascal Lance (Fra) à 4'32"
16. Richard Virenque (Fra) à 4'39"
17. Jean-Claude Colotti (Fra) à 5'01"
18. Robert Millar (Gbr) à 5'17"
19. Phil Anderson (Aus) à 5'20"
20. Luc Leblanc (Fra) à 6'12"
21. Paul Haghedooren (Bel) à 6'23"
22. Federico Garcia Melia (Esp) à 6'34"
23. Jim Van de Laer (Bel) à 6'48"
24. Adriano Baffi (Ita) à 6'57"
25. Dante Rezze (Fra) à 7'06"
That was just pure theatre!!
I was so glad to see Bernard win though. Though he was supposed to be cranky and difficult, it is nice to see talent shine, and he certainly had bucket-loads of talent. It was nice to see. Outstanding performance Jean-Francois!!
i often wonder if he hadnt flat on that stage of the '87 Tour de France , he would have won it all. Roche vs Bernard in the final TT, i got Bernard.
@@PanchoVillasTortilla You could have a point. His TT ability was phenomenal, absolutely, phenomenal, possibly the BEST ever. However after the day on Ventoux where he made a SUPREME effort, it left him weakened, just like any other rider. Roche and the boys knew this which is why they attacked him the day after Ventoux.
At the end of the day, mistakes and mishaps notwithstanding, it is the rider who has the most in the tank who wins a big stage race, and I don't see why Bernard couldn't have re-attacked in the following days, had he the reserves to do so.
I honestly think that in that tour (87) he was a second or third place rider who burnt out his candle when he did. That said, WHAT a stage to have won! - and he got 3rd overall as well. I'm Irish and delighted obviously to see Rochey win, but I totally saluted Jeff's efforts and sparkling talent, and privately remorsed his terribly bad luck with the Giro crash later in his career, which seemed to cap him off. I felt very bad for him, and for the cycling World in general. The cream of talent like his should get its few days in the sun.
@@Sionnach1601 well said and your points are taken….after the TT, he was up 2.5mim, without the flat I believe he would have controlled the damage from all the attacks to the point where the last TT would have been significant. I believe Bernard won that last TT and gained time on all the riders. The unwritten rule among the riders is never to attack a leader when he has crashed or flattened, but they did and for that reason I feel Bernard was robbed. That day he lost over 7minutes because of those factors. Not cool. His youth and inexperience as a leader hindered him from being more agggressive and attacking on subsequent stages. Roche and Delgado were leaders on their squads so they knew how to maneuver and attack because they were contenders in previous Tours. JFB was Hinaults heir but not totally ready. I honestly believe without the flat it would have been Roche vs Bernard last TT and as long as he was behind Roche no more than a minute, Bernard wins. The win, similar to Roche, would have been tactical not supremacy unlike Lemond and Hinault. On a side note , I would be curious to know what you thought of the doping accusations that both Roche and Delgado had years after that tour. Safe guess that EVERYONE is on something and some point but the champions get the scrutiny. Roche being a triple crown king that year and then almost disappearing is suspect to me. Man I could hours talking about this subject. Lol
11:55 Apparemment le coiffeur d'Indurain a passé l'hiver en prison !
Merci si tu as des videos de ce paris-nice en français ca serais super =)
Si Jean-François Bernard avait couru dans une autre équipe que Banesto, il aurait pu gagner le Tour de france cette année là. Car Indurain à 1 minute 10, quand même. Dans un Contre-La-Montre en côte. C'est un peu comme Kloden, qui gagna Paris-Nice et se sacrifia ensuite pour Ullrich au Tour.
Il avait les jambes, mais pas le tempérament, dommage, il aurait pu gagner plusieurs tours!
Jeff......c'était la classe !!
22:51 - 1990 record for Col d'Eze time trial by Jeff Bernard???
19:52 - 1989 by Stephen Roche....so, wtf?!?!
Plus Bradley Wiggins then in 2012, time of 19:12. So what is this commentator talking about?? Slightly different circuit perhaps??
Yes the stage was different. For example in 1989 it was a 10km stage. In 1992 (this video) it was 12km. In 2012 it was 9.6km.
@@TanteLeonieCombray And again, on bikes that weighed 3 kilos more, with no more than a 39x26 combo they were producing faster times. You new age weight weenies on your platic rigs hear that............?
@@death2pc I know. Completely agree with you.
I had at the age of 41 relaunched my own cycling efforts, completely renovated my 1973 Colnago (Columbus SL), weighed 9.5kg, cost about €400 in new parts etc, and I trained, trained, and trained. In a matter of 8 months I was equalling the best in the local club, all 10+ years younger than me.
Another 5 or 6 months later, with more tenacious training and proper eating, I was beating them. They had the best of the best of the best of modern gear. Bikes costing in total €5k+ with the super dish wheels, ugly black rims and spokes, the aero this and carbon that, all the razamataz everywhere throughout their bikes.
You should have seen how the hate started. It began with indifference, with some passing fleeting praise, but soon turned to sourness and eventually not saying hello to me. I continued to press and took a lot on Strava in our local areas, and also in the events.
I had to leave the club because of the animosity. You would think that somebody doing it with such minimalist equipment would be praised, but no.
I got a very nice CAAD12 at a good price and found about a 7% increase in overall, but still nothing to roar and shout about. The way these modern critics rail, one should think that I would have had AT LEAST a 200%+ increase in performance between the 70s steel, and the modern CAAD.
It's the engine, and the determination. Young fellas are only fooling themselves thinking that a new part is going to give them vaulting gains. They're deluded, and the retailer rubbing their hands in glee.