Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @valentinius62
    @valentinius62 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    If it was so important for "national security", then the Federal Government could have paid for any raises asked for and ordered the company to comply with any other demands that the union had. Funny how these war measure things always come down on the unions and the workers and never the companies.

  • @frederickawampaga4496
    @frederickawampaga4496 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please can I get the concept of separation of powers in it??

  • @henriomoeje8741
    @henriomoeje8741 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Private property cannot be seized without express grant by the constitution or congress. Congress didn't declare war in the Korean conflict.

  • @kennethwolf2730
    @kennethwolf2730 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is Youngstown Sheet & Tube now? Gone! U. S. Steel? Gone? Mahoning valley decimated. Steel production. Gone! Work force, gone. Industry, gone.

  • @PseudoDao
    @PseudoDao ปีที่แล้ว

    This reminds me of the tic tok acts they are discussing in april of 2023.

  • @nickcline9570
    @nickcline9570 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Add sources!!!

  • @pamelee67
    @pamelee67 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im no fan of the Republican party but they were right with Taft Hartley

  • @keithliggins8545
    @keithliggins8545 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This case may have some impact on the current Trump Emergency.

    • @LoadPast
      @LoadPast 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would've if the supreme court actually had an ounce of integrity right now

    • @TheUltimateDestroyer
      @TheUltimateDestroyer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      *Biden