Why No One Is Sanctioning ROSATOM

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.พ. 2023
  • Join the VisualPolitik community and support us on Patreon: / visualpolitik
    Did you know that there is a Russian state-owned company that is active all over the world and has escaped sanctions? Did you know that this same company is the world leader when it comes to building nuclear reactors and also supplying nuclear fuel even to the United States? In this video we tell you all the details about the crown jewel of Vladimir Putin's Russian industrial fabric.

ความคิดเห็น • 863

  • @clm652
    @clm652 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    A Russian is on an airliner flying to the US. An American next to him asks “What brings you to the US?” The Russian replies “I’m studying the American approach to propaganda.” The American asks “What propaganda?” The Russian says, “Exactly.”

    • @bisratgetachew8286
      @bisratgetachew8286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      exactly🤣🤣

    • @daviddabo2682
      @daviddabo2682 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Per Putin: no one competes with USA when it comes to propaganda!

  • @YBentertainming
    @YBentertainming ปีที่แล้ว +586

    With the european energy market being screwed as it is, might aswel start from the ground up. In the Netherlands we're trying to completely switch from gas and oil to electric (heating / transportation), however the infrastructure is nowhere near the required capacity. Europe should've never turned its back on nuclear energy.

    • @pxcvkalih3237
      @pxcvkalih3237 ปีที่แล้ว

      why every body hate russian. ??? is russian about to invade every another region after russian?? i think there some reasoon russian do special operation military to ukraine. because its security since ukraine is sided to the west . and in my opinion as country bridge betwen west and european this country should make himselft neutral. but what in my opinion most terrifing is why there zelensky who is clown have been chosen to be president . its insane dude how ukraine people lack of sharp thinking. in this matter i think immanuel maccron word is true Nato is brain dead ( in my opinion its not just only the leader. but also the people.

    • @poodlescone9700
      @poodlescone9700 ปีที่แล้ว

      The greens wanted this because they were fearmongering on nuclear.

    • @rastislavsmolek8140
      @rastislavsmolek8140 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Yeah, I agree with it criminally bad decision to turn off nuclear when green alternatives have nowhere near the capacity we need. It's one thing to produce electricity for homes etc. and it's an entirely different matter to power the industry. In the age when a lot of people realize that exporting production of everything out of europe can have unwanted consequences.

    • @pappaflammyboi5799
      @pappaflammyboi5799 ปีที่แล้ว

      Talking to your average sophomoric physicist would have explained that pretty well. Politicians are ignorant wankers.

    • @chris0000924
      @chris0000924 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      You can always remove sanctions you know lol

  • @Obscurai
    @Obscurai ปีที่แล้ว +292

    It is now clear that energy independence in all its forms is and should always be a national priority for all nations. Globalization of energy is and will always be a national security risk for all countries engaged in outsourcing their energy needs.

    • @nekoJens
      @nekoJens ปีที่แล้ว

      Nobody can steal the sun and wind from you. Deployment of renewable capacity PER YEAR will soon be more than all nuclear power EVER built.

    • @bachelor3846
      @bachelor3846 ปีที่แล้ว

      For most countries it’s impossible to guarantee energy independence. It’s very expensive joy. Only giants like USA, Russia, China etc. can be really independent. All countries in the world can’t pay for building nuclear plants or similar energy production means.

    • @The_Dark_Lord-69
      @The_Dark_Lord-69 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol, this is what the pro-nuclear people have been saying for the past decade. Germany abandoned and scrapped its entire Nuclear Industry expertise in favour of reliance on Russian Gas and French nuclear Energy, 67% of the time when the sun is not shining or the wind is not blowing.

    • @Obscurai
      @Obscurai ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@The_Dark_Lord-69 As pointed out in this video, nuclear has a dependence on fissionable material from Russia, so energy independence is not achieved with nuclear power.

    • @hubbablahloo1843
      @hubbablahloo1843 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ​@@Obscurai only because everyone decided to stop refining nuclear fuels after the cold war. Plenty of Nuclear resources in Canada and USA only they have no refinement currently.

  • @DIYToPen
    @DIYToPen ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Couldn't tell if I was watching at 1.5x speed every time you were on camera. Slow down, take a breath, guy.

    • @Wolvieonepunch
      @Wolvieonepunch ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually part of the reason why I don't watch this channel as much as I would normally😂

    • @archiebrown331
      @archiebrown331 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree😂😂😂

  • @killpendos
    @killpendos 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Germany has a recession for the second quarter in a row, and Russia has economic growth. Here is your future without energy from Russia.

  •  ปีที่แล้ว +33

    South Africa must employ ROSATOM to quickly solve our energy crises.

    • @skp8748
      @skp8748 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep like just turkey just did

    • @1Know1tHurts
      @1Know1tHurts 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We are more than happy to help you, guys

    • @MrDomingo55
      @MrDomingo55 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@skp8748 And Egypt, India and Bangladesh

  • @stevederp9801
    @stevederp9801 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    My view is that Ukraine was pushing Russia too far. They absolutely can and should join the European Union. But NATO is a slap in the face to Russia and we all know that.
    Adding Ukraine to NATO is an existential threat to Russia and isn’t an acceptable situation for them. It’s like having Russia putting a military base with tanks, planes and ships Ireland and expecting England to just be ok with it. Or if China had a military base in Tijuana with aircraft carriers, submarines and planes. There is no way that America would ever accept that.

    • @sharonlavery7656
      @sharonlavery7656 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Finland has joined NATO, it's just paperwork left to do now, Russia has said nothing about invading Finland?
      Ukraine had asked to join NATO because of Russian aggression, 2014 invasion and the Crimea land grab
      War criminal Putin wanted a warm water port, he stole Crimea from Ukraine to get it
      And in 2014 Russia stole a lot of Ukraine's military equipment so he thought he could start a full scale invasion without any real fighting.
      He was so our of touch he thought he had a good military, hahaha, corruption screwed all of Russia
      Glory to Ukraine

  • @nizamuddinuddin8905
    @nizamuddinuddin8905 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    ROSATAM building one nuclear power plant in Bangladesh with a power generation capacity of 2400 MW. Thus sanction on Rosatam could cause Bangladesh's power sector significantly however being not sanctioned by western countries allows the company to build the power plant on time and it will help Bangladesh to get clean energy at a competitive price.

    • @karthikeyanm.v8381
      @karthikeyanm.v8381 ปีที่แล้ว

      How is nuclear energy clean

    • @jeromeace1282
      @jeromeace1282 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@karthikeyanm.v8381 Because all the waste it produces can easily be buried in a pit of concrete in the ground.
      As for reactors, they're actually quite safe if you design them right (people like to talk about the melt down in 2011, but that ignores the fact that it happened due to the backup generators being placed in the basement levels, and thus being doomed to flood, another nuclear reactor nearby did just fine).

    • @user-fn8jo2mo2d
      @user-fn8jo2mo2d 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@jeromeace1282most of that waste is not even a waste, since spent fuel rods can be re used in breeder reactors to get thorium. Which is another type of nuclear fuel!

    • @decide9266
      @decide9266 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jeromeace1282 отходы можно отдать Росатому, у них есть технология с помощью которой из отходов можно произвести топливо, это называется замкнутый цикл, не имеет аналогов в мире

    • @inferno9103
      @inferno9103 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-fn8jo2mo2d which is acitvely tested by Rosatom and the y building full cycle reactor

  • @Szabchen
    @Szabchen ปีที่แล้ว +79

    The nuclear powerplant in Paks is Hungary's only nuclear powerplant.It's 2 blocks provide Hungary's energysupply of 40~50% and they are quite old, they must be relativly soon shut down. Hungary already took a loan from Russia pre war to be able to build 2 new reactors instead of the old ones. Most of the preparation work is done, it received the permits and escavation started recently. If we cannot build those, we wont meet the stategic aim of decarbonisation, we might risk our countrys energy and economical stabilitiy

    • @dr.benjaminbird7631
      @dr.benjaminbird7631 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why did they go with a Russian reactor?

    • @MarvinWestmaas
      @MarvinWestmaas ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dr.benjaminbird7631 Orban likes putler. And they are used to Sovjet / Russian tech.

    • @coderentity2079
      @coderentity2079 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@dr.benjaminbird7631 It's the best for the buck. Also compatible with the existing one.

    • @dr.benjaminbird7631
      @dr.benjaminbird7631 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@coderentity2079 No, it's extremely short sighted. Russian hydrocarbons were best for the buck, now look at where central Europe is.

    • @dr.benjaminbird7631
      @dr.benjaminbird7631 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@coderentity2079 also there's no such thing as "compatible with the existing one" even reactors at the same plant are different from eachother. TMI unit 1 is has a slightly different layout in the basement than unit 2 and they were built within months of eachother by the same company.

  • @dragosstanciu9866
    @dragosstanciu9866 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Atoms must be used for peace, not war.

    • @tyrport
      @tyrport ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The ghost of President Eisenhower thanks you for quoting him. 😊

    • @Rambam1776
      @Rambam1776 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      What a perfectly useless statement.

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 ปีที่แล้ว

      Funny thing is, under Yeltson, Soviet bombs core were being reprocessed into reactor fuel. You CAN have weapons for war and still use them for peace once those bombs reach their "expiration date".

    • @mojewjewjew4420
      @mojewjewjew4420 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Naivety in its most pure form.

    • @Dino_Hunter_420
      @Dino_Hunter_420 ปีที่แล้ว

      Atoms came to existence so that things like us and other cellular organisms can roam the earth 😂 now we use them to kill one and another , the very thing that created us ….. to me scientist it’s like saying ohh all might drop down in our foes and kill them 🤣😂

  • @seankelly1291
    @seankelly1291 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I would love to ask you to make a similar video on the space program. Like how Russia ferries international astronauts to space. Thank you.

  • @filibus31
    @filibus31 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    lot of footages used in this video are from ITER (international fusion project), wich is not a nuclear power plant.

    • @matinprsd
      @matinprsd ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes and literally every 5 seconds had to be a new song mixed with random footage

    • @user-zm3zi5ox5l
      @user-zm3zi5ox5l 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      25% оборудования это росатом как раз

  • @friedricheberharter9191
    @friedricheberharter9191 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Diamonds and pipeline gas are also net sanctioned. But you are right, it'll be much more difficult to get alternatives to Rosatom.

  • @SoibT2166
    @SoibT2166 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    So basically no sanction if it hurt us.

  • @speckbacon9881
    @speckbacon9881 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    If you say "check this out" or "look at this" one more time...
    seriously i know why its done that way but id rather look at channels that dont treat their audience like children

  • @rickrys2729
    @rickrys2729 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    HALEU (high enrichment) fuel is an issue. DOE is partnering with Centrus to manufacture 16 advanced centrifuges for deployment at an enrichment facility in Piketon, Ohio. The new SMR from Terrapower is planning to use HAKEU fuel

  • @robertmyers6488
    @robertmyers6488 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Reduce their moral? That has more to do with its Zelensky foolishly attacking that same power plant. What are they to do leave it on and hope it doesn't melt down? Which do you prefer?

  • @gagandeepsinghPB02
    @gagandeepsinghPB02 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a Story Man! I am so high & loved it ❤❤

  • @jhutsebaut
    @jhutsebaut ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Centrus Energy (LEU) is a domestic enricher of uranium that is building a new enrichment plant. It plans to begin producing later this year.

  • @heinzbongwasser2715
    @heinzbongwasser2715 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Hope germany wakes up, nuclear is great

    • @keepitraw1
      @keepitraw1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We won’t, only if we suffer heavily.

    • @jordankristoff5406
      @jordankristoff5406 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nah sleep tight

    • @rug4565
      @rug4565 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wouldn't call it great considering the kind of waste it produces. But yeah, everything comes with its drawbacks. And Germany probably shouldn't have shut them all down so quickly and make itself dependent on Russia.

    • @Sigkete
      @Sigkete 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@keepitraw1Is the switch to coal and oil not enough?

    • @keepitraw1
      @keepitraw1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sigkete nah starvation is needed

  • @struziu7
    @struziu7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why would you speed up the video? It's clearly visible, and it has a significant toll on the watching experience. If I want to speed up something, I have the option to do so in settings.

  • @MrShadowjockey
    @MrShadowjockey ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The sound in the video seems a bit sped up, what's up with that?

  • @_Alfa.Bravo_
    @_Alfa.Bravo_ ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do you smoke 2 packs a day or drink liters of coffee... ?

  • @ChelovegII
    @ChelovegII ปีที่แล้ว +17

    You finally learned how to pronounce "nuclear"

    • @reddixiecrat
      @reddixiecrat ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wish I could give this comment more likes. I can’t express how traumatic that pronunciation was to my ears 😂

    • @shryggur
      @shryggur ปีที่แล้ว

      Isn't the nucular guy the hairy one?

  • @milerale5286
    @milerale5286 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Germany imported more coal from Russia in 2022 then all previous years. Sanctions you say?

    • @dpt6849
      @dpt6849 ปีที่แล้ว

      And they allready had Helmuth Kohl for president😂

  • @jmonsted
    @jmonsted ปีที่แล้ว +130

    We should rapidly ramp up "domestic" (as in, NATO-sources at least) nuclear fuel sources. Greenland has quite a bit of uranium, apparently.

    • @chris0000924
      @chris0000924 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Hmm didn't an orange man run up and down about building domesticated industries before a few years ago? Must be my imagination

    • @timgooding2448
      @timgooding2448 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just grab uranium from Australia. They have plenty!

    • @ThebigJJ621
      @ThebigJJ621 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Unfortunately is not going to happen. NATO countries besides France and South Korea absolutely hate nuclear for some reason. Germany almost closed all of its nuclear power plants and here in the US, the state I am living in (California) we literary only have 1 operating nuclear plant.

    • @DimitarKapitanov
      @DimitarKapitanov ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ThebigJJ621 South Korea is no a "NATO country" :)

    • @davidtomczak8035
      @davidtomczak8035 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just import it from Australia et al

  • @bachelor3846
    @bachelor3846 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Rosatom is one of a few things today we can be proud of. Apart from its advances in nuclear plants construction and uranium enrichment during last years, it is also a leader of nuclear research. I’d apply for work in this company, if I had proper education. Rosatom has great potential. Europe won’t influence it much by any sanctions.

    • @vatanak8146
      @vatanak8146 ปีที่แล้ว

      do they hire many non russians??

    • @terencemalik6415
      @terencemalik6415 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@vatanak8146 We organized a college in Uzbekistan, and for 5 years were teaching Uzbek students, who will be operating the Rosatom reactors being built in Uzbekistan, paid by Uzbekistan. Smart approach...

    • @vatanak8146
      @vatanak8146 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@terencemalik6415 do many people from IT area get hired? I am getting a CS deegre and if they hired people of the area it would be great

    • @levismith7444
      @levismith7444 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well it’s easy to be the best in the business when you “recycle” all your nuclear waste by dumping it into the nearest lake or river

    • @terencemalik6415
      @terencemalik6415 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@levismith7444 You're mad

  • @josephlownes5138
    @josephlownes5138 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One reason is they own a uranium mine in Canada that the USA had to approve

  • @GlebShamal
    @GlebShamal ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @gmoneyx2837
    @gmoneyx2837 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Very enlightening and makes total sense as to why Russia would occupy and defend the plant in Ukraine. They are not trying to take over control of the plant.. they are trying to protect their control of the of plant 👍thanks!

  • @darthjarjar5309
    @darthjarjar5309 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is 1 of the best VisialPolitik thumbnails. Kudos to the artist.

  • @cookingonthego9422
    @cookingonthego9422 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, what do you know no one wants to dirty their hands with radioactive stuff.

  • @jackmoore1415
    @jackmoore1415 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you speed up the footage? talk & movement is too fast

  • @Onjii-ys5in
    @Onjii-ys5in 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I think that the EU and the US will need time to restore their nuclear energy (if they want to do this) and this time will be spent by Russia to stop depending on the sale of enriched uranium and Rosatom, so even if sanctions are imposed on it, it will not be at all it will affect Russia. moreover, the US and the EU are not the whole world, but only a small part of it.

  • @pierrec1590
    @pierrec1590 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does that mean that the nuclear powered subs, aircraft carriers, and cruisers would be fueled by Russian nuclear fuel?

  • @hotcamui
    @hotcamui 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My dear, you have and got not full information about RosAtom. Otherwise i missed it, but i think it should be main. In 2021 (every news agencies have lost it) Rosatom Corporation sterted to test new reactor, when worked fuel (or dumped fuelm or whatever you name it. the fuel that can't be used in production of energy again)/ Well RosAtom has created the reactor that can recycle that fuel once again, and then change rods and recycle again, and then again. and so on. It seems if that will be workink RosAtom will be capable to provide humanity with energy for next 3000 years with only stuff that was digged up, check RosAtom better

    • @aaroncosier735
      @aaroncosier735 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which reactor is that?
      The BN-800 is designed to use plutonium from decommissioned weapons. It can also use plutonium that has been separated from spent nuclear fuel, but that plutonium has to be refined to a similar degree. MOX fuels of this type are also used in the US. They are not a solution to nuclear waste as the used MOX fuel has greater disposal difficulties than ordinary UOX fuel. It is also much less easy to reprocess.
      The BN-800 most certainly cannot re-use the spent fuel from other reactors in any straightforward manner.
      You must be thinking of some other reactor type.

    • @doctoranimationda5491
      @doctoranimationda5491 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aaroncosier735it’s the salt reactor they made.

  • @shaneboardwell1060
    @shaneboardwell1060 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is commissioner Gordon doing on the thumbnail?

  • @silverhawkscape2677
    @silverhawkscape2677 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice use of Midjourney or Stable diffusion for your Thumbnails.

  • @hoots187
    @hoots187 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Syria sanctions have been placed on a 6 month moratorium after the earthquake
    So much for sanctions not hurting ordinary people.

  • @X_iCjay
    @X_iCjay ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Teeth whitening has made great strides in the last 5 years

  • @JT.Pilgrim
    @JT.Pilgrim ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can get all the required materials in Canada for nuclear.

    • @Solid_Snake88
      @Solid_Snake88 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too expensive to ship and extract, better to build EU chains

  • @jrocks6969
    @jrocks6969 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They should raise price

  • @82boulou
    @82boulou ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I just think that what the US and their allies are doing in General will no doubt give leverage to China in every single way .. Russia will adapt to this decoupling too and will be totally thrown into the Chinese sphere since it will have no interest at all with the west and the globe will fall into another cold war between 2 camps but this time it's not a communist one , It's a camp that can actually beat the west in the capitalistic game .. Way more countries around the world will fall into the Sino-Russian Camp with all the Chinese lucrative loans and efficient construction capacity and by time with aging Europe and the lack of Natural resources and the degradation of the industrial base due to higher production cost , the European economies will shrink and their influence around the globe will diminish which will in turn Weaken the western bloc influence in it's entirety ... In some years to come Europe first and the US shortly after will discover they've committed the greatest geopolitical mistake of their entire history by unnecessarily expanding NATO and isolating Russia .

    • @insomniacresurrected1000
      @insomniacresurrected1000 ปีที่แล้ว

      China has a larger economy than the EU. So Russia does not need the EU. Add other countries to the mix like India, Iran, some African and Latin American nations and you can bypass the EU totally. What does the EU offer Russia, Louis Vuitton? The Russians can get the later from Dubai and Hong Kong.

    • @User-jr7vf
      @User-jr7vf ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "by unnecessarily expanding NATO and isolating Russia"-----By isolating Russia, yes. Expanding NATO, no. Countries sorrounding Russia are showing interest in joining NATO. Some people talk like everybody is being forced into NATO against their will. With regards to isolating Russia, this is a decision made by the USA to its own benefit, and the Europeans fell for it, because their relation with the USA is like that of a master and a slave.

    • @whenuakitekid
      @whenuakitekid ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You’ve nailed it !

    • @jeromeace1282
      @jeromeace1282 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@User-jr7vf You somehow understand that NATO expansion is entirely willing yet somehow ignore why its happening.
      During the cold war it was an anti USSR alliance, but afterwards everyone decided they liked being able to save money on military spending by making it the USA's problem.
      Then came the post cold war members, those of the former warsaw pact who joined NATO because russia treated them how the USA treated south america, and ofc joining an opposing military alliance is just the natural thing to do in that case.

  •  ปีที่แล้ว

    Btw the cheapest, safest, cleanest and most eff nuclear is thorium (molten salt) - doesn't need enrichment, plentiful (~3x more than U-238 and 300x U-235).

  • @normanarmslave5144
    @normanarmslave5144 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing story. the more I totally ignore this pathetic of a war at all

  • @NotEvenHereXx
    @NotEvenHereXx ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I had to check the playback speed, talking so fast

  • @FlamingBasketballClub
    @FlamingBasketballClub ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent thumbnail 😂

  • @doublehelix7880
    @doublehelix7880 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    A country that does not have own deposits of gas, oil, etc fuel cannot become "energy independent". This applies practically for all European ones with few exceptions. So the entire conflict is who will rule this market.

    • @SportZFan4L1fe
      @SportZFan4L1fe ปีที่แล้ว

      😂 Europe is a MINOR Market. It's literally imploding. China, ASEAN, AFRICA, MIDDLE EAST, SOUTH AMERICA, BRICS, makes European Market look like a Chihuahua standing beside a full grown Bull Elephant 🐘. In other words, Europe Needs Russia more than Russia needs Europe..

  • @ronhilton4294
    @ronhilton4294 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Turkey has some great fault lines perfect for nuclear power plants.

    • @ahmedmohamed-gx9xe
      @ahmedmohamed-gx9xe ปีที่แล้ว

      what do you mean?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

    • @ronhilton4294
      @ronhilton4294 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ahmedmohamed-gx9xe I'm being sarcastic. Earthquakes and nuclear power are just a bad idea

    • @ahmedmohamed-gx9xe
      @ahmedmohamed-gx9xe ปีที่แล้ว +2

      there's strike slip fault( horizontal displacement fault) in California yet it have big nuclear power plant.

    • @ronhilton4294
      @ronhilton4294 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ahmedmohamed-gx9xe I know. They run a huge risk no matter how strong they built it. Incidentally, Turkey has recently been adding hydro electric dams. Also a bad idea in siesmicly active zones. The wieght of the water can trigger earthquakes as Alberta is finding with thier site C dam.

    • @ahmedmohamed-gx9xe
      @ahmedmohamed-gx9xe ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ronhilton4294 Turkiye is industrialized state for that it needs a lot of electricity.
      so how do you suggest to to find that kind of electricity,

  • @lostpony4885
    @lostpony4885 ปีที่แล้ว

    @2 min proper containment vessel

  • @richardtheweaver4891
    @richardtheweaver4891 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    There's a whole lot of highly enriched uranium in those bombs. There's one part of the process easily done, and we have experience in converting nukes into fuel, so the quote about being able to start working on the issue by 2025 seems crazy slow. This is actual war, after all

  • @kaydim5921
    @kaydim5921 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think this company has made headway.

    • @Jock-mj4zd
      @Jock-mj4zd ปีที่แล้ว

      I picked up on that too. Lol. Guess he missed it in the edit.

  • @alexbuckle1085
    @alexbuckle1085 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm assuming they are also responsible for maintaining nuclear weapons and producing plutonium?

  • @EamonCoyle
    @EamonCoyle ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The UK government have said they are not concerned as they have Ross Kemp !!

  • @wesspence
    @wesspence ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude is tweekin'😂

  • @angeurbain6129
    @angeurbain6129 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The good question should be: why anybody should be sanctionning Rosatom ?

  • @neil7788
    @neil7788 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ahhhh, these inverted transitions are making me slightly nauseous, please restrict yourself to one or two axis's for a transition, not mirroring and then doing a side swipe/other transition. Could just be a mistake in editing? Nice vid otherwise. Too much movement with the mirrored y-axis every transition :(

  • @dataman6744
    @dataman6744 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Rosatom is not on par with anyone,,,its above all

  • @WelcomeToDERPLAND
    @WelcomeToDERPLAND ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does your voice sound slightly sped up?

  • @Kenneth_James
    @Kenneth_James ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh, so that's why we don't have more nuclear plants

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, fearmongering around 3-mile Island and Chernobyl created hysteria over nuclear power. Fukushima gave that same anti-nuke crowd a booster shot. That stands in stark contrast to the history of the US Navy's nuclear power porgram.

  • @josephhaokip7
    @josephhaokip7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I m always waiting for new episode from India♥

  • @mondlit
    @mondlit ปีที่แล้ว

    If i here you say "Ross-atom" one more time, I'll cut my ears off

  • @onurturhal6814
    @onurturhal6814 ปีที่แล้ว

    That image made with Aİ???

  • @d.a.i.i5836
    @d.a.i.i5836 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Holy f*** i didint no about uranium and rosatom

  • @Holuunderbeere
    @Holuunderbeere ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well germany had the means and the money for tapping into renewable energy sources but wasted it

  • @user-wz1qo1cn3i
    @user-wz1qo1cn3i 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think you should try Crest White Strips.

  • @98karlh
    @98karlh ปีที่แล้ว

    Those music breaks were rediculuos, cut them and you could cut your talking speed by 10% and still finish int he same time :)

  • @458Rx
    @458Rx ปีที่แล้ว

    Minute 5:00 on-wards, pretty large section of repeated audio.

  • @defencebangladesh4068
    @defencebangladesh4068 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rosatom is building Bangladesh's first nuclear power plant.

  • @DarkSnake49542
    @DarkSnake49542 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    EU will probably it the same way they did for other things : sanctions any new contracts (construction, providing nuclear materials) but leave those already done or in an advance states (lot of money spent already) un sanctioned.
    That way, EU can say it sanctionned Russia (for any future project with Russia) while leaving states with no other choice with their current contracts. (since Hungary and all states with Russian nuclear reactors can't change and choose another provider for compatibility issues and Hungary wants to block any sanctions unless it isn't concerned at all)

    • @Aryan-nv9kd
      @Aryan-nv9kd ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Aw, such a cute little US puppet.
      EU is adorable now. Once colonialists, now the colonized.

  • @user-wz1qo1cn3i
    @user-wz1qo1cn3i 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much of this was caused by bad management at Westinghouse and General Electric? Those 2 did a lot of the manufacturing and (what is left) of Westinghouse is owned by another company.

  • @vetar3372
    @vetar3372 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the accent

  • @TJIconer
    @TJIconer ปีที่แล้ว

    Source?.

  • @gringoviejo1935
    @gringoviejo1935 ปีที่แล้ว

    one solution, move to CANDU reactors which use unenriched uranium fuel despite proliferation risk allegations or,
    better solution, move to thorium cycle molten salt rectors (MSR) which are fueled with "waste" of other mining operations - MSR are reportedly much safer. Andrew Yang pushed this in his primary run.

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 ปีที่แล้ว

    For the US and Europe and other advanced allied nuclear power nations it's, "Buy from ROSATOM now while building up fissionable material and nuclear plant tech." This will permit them to wean off of ROSATOM's fuel supply in the near future.

    • @TimurSulutdinov
      @TimurSulutdinov 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      By this future all will be changed

  • @espanner97
    @espanner97 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rosatom is a part of ITER, so it cannot be replaced.

  • @matinprsd
    @matinprsd ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dude why do you have to randomly put a random new song every 5 seconds to unnecessarily hype shit up

  • @stevesoltysiak1161
    @stevesoltysiak1161 ปีที่แล้ว

    Reminds me of when Hellary Clinton sold off America’s Uranium One company to Putin:(

  • @jamesjohnston4160
    @jamesjohnston4160 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    USA had a nuclear power plant in 1951, actually. The Experimental Breeder Reactor I in Arco, Idaho.

  • @TheCJUN
    @TheCJUN ปีที่แล้ว

    What if Russia threatens to ban the exports of Rosatom to the West unless certain citera are meet.

  • @wei__yan
    @wei__yan ปีที่แล้ว

    Not now but soon...

  • @doriangrey4822
    @doriangrey4822 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Great insights! Never heard of ROSATOM until now! Frankly, asides germany, Russia is the most powerful force in europe. US & its sanctions can't tame the Kremlin to adopt a pro-west agenda. On the enrichment list, Russia & China account for more than half the global supply. Iran & North Korea have enrichment plants and are alloed with Russia & China.

    • @chris1806
      @chris1806 ปีที่แล้ว

      Europe should have never turned its back on Russia in order to satisfy the criminal anglosaxon clique that has messed up Europe by supporting a criminal Ukronazi regime!

  • @RonaldFleming-lo8eo
    @RonaldFleming-lo8eo ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this company is our humanity best at carbo neutral tech. why for sake of mankind. stop this company ? its the best humans have. forget Ukraine for a minute.
    This is the best we have
    ROSATOM

  • @SanalMG
    @SanalMG ปีที่แล้ว

    Putin's last card : nuclear bombs (not fuel)!

  • @eaphantom9214
    @eaphantom9214 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    06:59 - Bangladesh 🇧🇩 is on Russias 🇷🇺 nuclear R&D?

    • @cyrilsuperkonar3422
      @cyrilsuperkonar3422 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes Russia is building Bangladesh first nuclear reactors

  • @samiirlopez3050
    @samiirlopez3050 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    fam i love ur clips but just one thing whats up with ur teeth color ?

    • @theboxingbiker
      @theboxingbiker ปีที่แล้ว

      Smoking, Coffee and no brushing

  • @Aussie-Mocha
    @Aussie-Mocha ปีที่แล้ว

    So… where does Westinghouse Nuclear program fit in to all this ?
    Many don’t realise that Kyiv had agreed to allow Westinghouse to install a new system in to the Zaporizija nuclear plant that would increase the amount of power it was producing. Ironically, the day that program was set to begin was the day Russia invaded.

    • @AmurTiger
      @AmurTiger ปีที่แล้ว

      It doesn't. The AP-1000 nuclear reactor builds have been catastrophic failures. The fuel thing is far less of an issue one way or another then the ability to actually build a reactor on time and on budget. Russia, China and Korea are the competitors in that, nobody else is worth mentioning.
      If the west wants to change that they're going to have to put their bigboy pants on and actually build shit. A dozen GW of nuclear focused on a couple designs could likely get the western nuclear industry reasonably functional again, though likely still slower and more expensive then Rosatom but functional enough that those in the western camp will be able to commit to more then 1/2 reactors here and there.

  • @Paul_C
    @Paul_C ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A tiny remark. I Simon is not easy to replace, English is his language. However I can live with an American accent. What I can't get used to is the speed you are using. It isn't a competition, I watch something to learn from, however it needs to be at a speed understandable to people that might not able to translate at your speed. Slow down soon or loose viewers. It really is up to you.

  • @benji37
    @benji37 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The green party is the worst thing that happen to France energy

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 ปีที่แล้ว

      People don't realize that French politics has an anti-nuclear streak almost as bad as Germany.

    • @benji37
      @benji37 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@gregorymalchuk272 It is getting better for now, we need to see how it will evolve but the last 20 years where horrible

  • @sayedmahbub8933
    @sayedmahbub8933 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have a nuclear plant under construction of 2400MW. US sanction on Russian ships slowed our construction but it is expected to be operation in 2024.

  • @ateisme3752
    @ateisme3752 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fuel

  • @priceandpride
    @priceandpride ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve got the same fake tooth

  • @DailyFactDoze
    @DailyFactDoze ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone tell him to go see the dentist plz

  • @F2pplayer001
    @F2pplayer001 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't tell me you pick this topic from vintage they recently discussed this 🤔

  •  ปีที่แล้ว

    7.5 minute until he answered 😩

  • @petehoney1
    @petehoney1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the 'global economy' is the global economy .. the big question is the reason why the US at what ever the cost to everyone, will not ease back a bit on it's obsession with total dominance ..

  • @PowerOfGoedbuy
    @PowerOfGoedbuy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Author, thanks for the true story, but please tell about new nuclear stations that run on nuclear garbage and produce new nuclear fuel for old type nuclear stations that run on old generation types. Close cycle of using same fuel with no limits( no costs!!!!!) Checkmate!

  • @yuriandropov9462
    @yuriandropov9462 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is the americans compagnies are the state ones as McDonald's, Exxon, chevron..... Bcs when th us government urges tgem to quit any market lije russia , they do not think. They have juste to apply the order.

  • @pravindahiya719
    @pravindahiya719 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the EU wants 1) enriched Uranium to be present in EU ( for energy or weapons )
    2) EU does NOT want Uranium accumulation in Russia.
    buying it solves both the purposes.

  • @williamwilson6499
    @williamwilson6499 ปีที่แล้ว

    Realpolitik: A system of politics or principles based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations.