REVIEW: Rolex Explorer 214270 39mm
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- This is a review of the Rolex 39mm 214270 Explorer. The watch features a 3132 movement and is one of the most over-looked models in the Rolex range.
Please consider a Patreon Pledge to help me create future content: / watchhobbyist
Also, if you see any Amazon links in this description, please use them for your purchase. It will cost you nothing more, but I will receive a small percentage to add to the running costs of the channel. Thanks!
Thanks for watching. Make sure you subscribe to the channel for notifications of new videos!
Instagram: @WatchHobbyist
Join Patreon here... / mxoopd
This watch is superb, whoever says the handles are too short has not seen it in person, they are the perfect size to “merge” with the white gold numbers, incredible. Now the Mk2 does the opposite and covers them. It is just perfect!
Opposed to what most people think, the watch worn by Sir Edmund Hillary during the ascent was not a Rolex but a Smiths watch. Sherpa Tenzing Norgay was indeed wearing a Rolex watch at the time he reached the summit -a gold bubble-back ref. 6305 given to him by Swiss climber Raymond Lambert.
I own this watch....It's the best Rolex I've ever had...Strong , simple , reliable and just beautiful.....
A good summary. I'm not a fan of the new version, so the mk1 is one of my favourite watches of all time
I have the exact same one and I prefer it to the newer one
Just bought this watch yesterday, I love it! After trying on many different models and variations of Rolex watches, this one stood out for me.
+Joe April Fantastic choice. All the watch you could ever need. Enjoy 👍
Joe April I just bought one as well. Love it already.
Might be the cleanest dial of all the Rolexes. Personally prefer nonluminescent numbers bc it goes better with the matt dial.
+grokker99 Me too, this the the version I like the most
Nice watch, I agree the hour hand could be slightly longer.
+Bob FromBrisbane Yeah it's just mm from perfection but still absolutely fine.
It’s a shorty.... so the hands are from the previous model.... the Mark II has longer and thicker maxi hands so if much better as well as lumped 3, 6 and 9
Numbers are white gold as are the hands and stick markers.
Nice review, you should keep it
This one is on my buy list for sure.
You'd never regret it Colin
+Watch Hobbyist Have you seen the new model of this with the longer hands?
Absolute Stunner !
Do you still own this watch? If so, could you give us an update on life with it please.
I have one of these and it's person lay my favourite Rolex. understated and less ubiquitous than the ever present submariner, more sporty that the day date, and less bling than the Daytona.
I totally agree. Lovely and understated.
Nice effort and a comfortable voice and review, however the bracelet on 214270 explorer is different to 116710 GMT (has a centre polished link) I believe.
+TF Caravan thanks, no I thought I mentioned same bracelet other than the PCLs? Anyway, identical but the explorer is totally brushed, so will show less wear. Really fantastic watch.
A stunning watch... I debated between this and the 114300. Opted for the 14300 as I fell in love with the modern styling and dynamic dial! Can i contact you about how much you'd like for this? Twitter perhaps?!
Where did you buy this E1?
This is the nicest one in my opinion.
the oyster perpetual was the everest watch , the explorer was brought out later as a tribute to the achievement.
Thanks for the info :-)
So true and it's ironic that the modern oyster perpetual 36 ref. 116000 is actually much more in line with what the original explorer was all about. I wish they would make it 36mm again.
Beautiful classic timepiece.
Spot on, 39mm is such a perfect size too
the only think I don't like is that the our an minutes hands are too shorts!
I like the Explorer between the two, in fact I bought one the late 2015. Now they changed it and you know I'm not happy but, I will not sell it to get the updated model. Do love the lume of the 2016 model.
I prefer the model you own over the current version. Not a fan of the "improvements"
Your kind trying to make me feel better. Damn model changes!
I got my information from Jomashop, your caliper wins this argument hands down! Sorry about that.
Great review - I am actually getting this watch at the end of the week so your review has helped me mull over the craving a little. I´ve been through almost the entire Rolex sports watch segment in my time, but I am looking very much forward to this, as I like the simplistic yet tough look of it.
A couple of things though I would like to comment on your review - the 3-6-9 are in fact white gold. And the sapphire crystal has no reflective coating what so ever - but with the matte dial, reflections are not so much of a problem ............... and if the light is wrong I guess you just turn your wrist slightly.
I´ve had the easylink bracelet on the Explorer II before, and it is just the perfect thing, when it is a hot day or you have been working out in some way - or maybe even at night when my wrists tend to expand a little (yes I do sleep with my watch on).
+Peter Beck-Rasmussen That's great info, thanks Peter. I really hope you enjoy the watch, although I have no doubt you will :-)
Superb watch, now discontinued, classic for sure and a great investment
Thanks for the review. I hadn't considered this watch at all until I saw this. Was going for a sub. But now undecided!
+Paul Talbot You really couldn't go wrong with either, but the Explorer is a stunning watch, a lot less money, and seems to hold it's overall value better than any other Rolex this side of a D-Blue.
+Watch Hobbyist thanks for that. Really interested now! Could you tell me what I should be paying RRP £4300?
I know of one cheaper if you're seriously interested, so just direct-message me if you're interested
+Watch Hobbyist how do I do that?
+Paul Talbot If you click on my channel page, and then about I think you can find the contact details there, thanks
Want a prediction? The new (2016) model is not going to "get overlooked"...in fact, it's going to prove very popular.
Hope so. I bought the newest version with the lume on the 3,6,9 and longer hands a month ago.
Just so happen that when I went in the AD they had got 1 in that day. It is the perfect watch.
Never said what is the weight of Watches. Even the official Rolex website doesn't put this spec. at the model's page.
Good point, I'll try and integrate this in future
I wish they still made it in 36mm
Me too, maybe this week that will change, who knows. By the way I thought I had a fly on my screen thanks to your avatar! :-)
I have a 1950s Rolex explorer and it is my prized possession probably not worth that much financially though.
It's not always about the financial side. The sentimental watches are just as important, and I'm sure it's worth more than you think anyway.
oh
Great review :) I'm really taken by the 2016 model, I know it's not hugely different to this model but hey. May have to go treat myself!!
Thanks, I really wasn't a fan when I tried it out, but perhaps this will change over time. The Mk1 214270 as I guess it is now was more than perfect to my eye.
Freddie d'Alquen Yeah, I loved this watch but the short hands really bothered me so I got a 116710 GMT Master II instead. Now that they’ve replaced the hands on the 214270 Explorer so that it looks right, I’m buying one this fall.
i prefer the 39mm oyster perpetual -- same movement, prettier dial, hands are properly proportioned (the hands are too short on this explorer)
+NoxiousButtSpray The new watch is really nice, I agree, but the lack of easy link and the strangely coloured dials don't appeal to me anywhere as much.
+Watch Hobbyist yeah, it has way less lume too, if that's important to you
at what price range and where can you get it with msrp reduced? thanks
+Carlos Vasquez This watch is just over £4000GBP.
Now £5k 😫
I don’t understand you guys who buy a watch and are never sure if you’re going to keep it or flip it. What’s the point? Buy what you like by all means but wear the bloody thing,take the stickers off and get to know the piece on a personal level instead philosophical one. Too nice to keep it in the box,it’s a wonderful watch
Personal preference that's all, and a lot of money to lose if I end up disliking it
I never understand people who comment on social media, judging complete strangers for what they do with the watches they own.
Subbed. Good luck to you! Squale 1521 review next please.................just kidding.
Your dulcet Notts tones are a soothing relief from the most metrosexual man ever to call him self.........."The Guv'nor"
And please don't put adverts in the middle of your videos old boy. It's just not cricket is it.
+Mr.Chai Notts?! Now that's really not cricket. I'm from sunny Manchester. I do have a friend from Notts if that helps though. Thanks for subbing.
...you must invest in a better camera...this lack of focus is very tiring...
Lucas Karatzas are you going to buy it buddy?
Watch Hobbyist if I could I would. But since you have a channel I thought the min requirement is clear picture and sound ;)
Himalaya watch ≠ Rolex. It was a Smiths
There's a LOT of debate with evidence to suggest both Rolex and Smiths used
Both were taken
Datejust or air king over this any day.......
Really?
The airking is vile in my opinion and the Datejust is... meh 🤷🏻♂️ ten a penny, I've had 3 and wouldn't buy another. The explorer has an understated class to it that I really like.
Bla bla bla...put it on, put it on, put it on...
Booo black & white blurred wrist shot
Chill, this was an early video
Looks like a seiko..and the digits look like they belong on an LCD screen on a Casio..really bad font choice.
Bruv the new explorer for 2016 was announced in Baselworld by Rolex, please update this video!
Do you have one to lend me? By the way, I don't like it as much as the Mk1 :-)
Yep..Looks like they finally used up those surplus hands.
This watch is superb, whoever says the handles are too short has not seen it in person, they are the perfect size to “merge” with the white gold numbers, incredible. Now the Mk2 does the opposite and covers them. It is just perfect!